Top 8 US Forces Player ist F*CKING OP! | COH3 | Afrikakorps | 4vs4 | No Commentary

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
  • 🟠 Save up to 90% on Games! www.instant-ga... *
    🔵 Write something nice for better karma :)
    ····················································································
    TH-cam-Tags
    #companyofheroes #companyofheroes3 #companyofheroes3gameplay
    ····················································································
    Transparency
    All links marked with * are so-called affiliate links. This means that if you buy something there (of course nobody has to), the linking party (in this case me) earns a few cents without it costing you more. As an example, the partner then earns a little less from the product.

ความคิดเห็น • 59

  • @caseysehon5696
    @caseysehon5696 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I have become much better at builds and unit management after watching a lot of your videos. Thanks dude

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks for the praise! glad that the videos have helped you! :)

  • @FriesX7
    @FriesX7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    18:43 MVP Ketten Escape

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      they can be really annoying^^

  • @magnusberge
    @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    09:18 what a beautiful combined arms attack by the enemy here, you could have prevented alot of your losses by respecting that this plane is now scouting your armys, location but you just sit there and let him take positions against you and blow you up, this is the power scouting

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes, he did a good job. i still have to work on my scouting.

  • @Prince-Of-Persia
    @Prince-Of-Persia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bro you were F*CKING OP LOL just look at the damage dealt at the end :D 19:05 only here moving them forward rather than sides was really risky 0-0

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks. yes, but that's primarily due to the flack. it just causes damage without end.

  • @Prince-Of-Persia
    @Prince-Of-Persia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    22:33 poor pink player didn't know where to go LOL

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      haha yes that was funny :) was a bit tight^^

  • @magnusberge
    @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    01:45 Remember that Units cant be suppressed by beeing in Green Cover, you could have put your soldiers BEHIND the Half-Track to give them Green Cover OR you could have put them inside the Half-Track so they can stil shoot out and not get suppressed

    • @naksachaisaejane1982
      @naksachaisaejane1982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Units can be suppressed in green cover. It's just so hard that one HMG won't do it.

    • @magnusberge
      @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@naksachaisaejane1982 hm have you tested this or just seen in happend ingame? beacuse if just 1 model is not in heavy cover then the entire squad is suppressed, maybe the 2nd MG was at a diffrent angle so it caught a model in the open?

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ok ok

    • @poonstangable
      @poonstangable 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes very useful to pick up your squad being suppressed and move them behind the mg

    • @naksachaisaejane1982
      @naksachaisaejane1982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@magnusbergeI'm fairly certain that'd be the case if the suppression modifier isn't 0 in normal green cover. It isn't 0 in CoH2, at least.
      Also, I think the suppression doesn't work on squad when they have just 1 member out of cover like CoH2. It just makes that one member to die much easier.

  • @poonstangable
    @poonstangable 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    DAK still seems pretty weird to play. i have been off and on with this game since launch waiting for patches etc.
    Your only AT options are jaegers or AT guns. Against brits mortars, AT guns are less effective so its like shit what do cuz jaegers only ok and take forever to get them out.
    no good artillery option like nebelwerfer to counter the turtle; tho i havent played much with the field guns but seems like their range is lacking
    thing with DAK is you always feel like your outnumbered no matter what cuz everything is like 1.5 times as expensive to get. tech and units
    i have noticed that the pgrens are SUPER good when upgraded with +1 model and mg34 but its pretty expensive to get to and basically u sacrifice getting out another 1-2 squads for it
    the mortar trucks are so meh and die so easy. the AA halftrack shot for the whole duration of 2 spy planes and couldnt shoot down either. US AA would shoot that shit down in 2 sec
    DAK vehicles get countered by just 1 or 2 AT guns with not many good options to take them out when you have 2-3 less infantry squads to push and shit tier indirect fire options
    DAK is so weird of a faction imo and difficult to figure out and just less overall effective than other factions it feels like
    Anyone with more DAK experience care to give their input?

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes i think dak is the most difficult faction. especially because of the initial vehicles that break down so quickly. but dak is also super fun once you've gained a few rounds of experience.

    • @strategist6962
      @strategist6962 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I couldn't disagree more. DAK has the highest winrates and has an easy counter to everything right now. They do struggle in late game without the tank call ins but that's fair considering how strong they are in early, mid, and very late game.

  • @magnusberge
    @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    10:10 Why do you have 3x anti-tank guns when you have seen zero vehicles at this point but we have seen tons of infantry, you really need to see what the enemy is building and try to counter it a bit (from the start of the match we saw 3 planes go inn so we knew that it would be airborn heavy infantry focus)

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i have lost to stuarts before (i think 2 times)^^

    • @magnusberge
      @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Achilles-Gaming So you played with the strategi of a prevous match instead of seeing what was happening right infront of you in this match, gota find a better balance ;)

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@magnusberge 🤔

    • @fredg7296
      @fredg7296 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just passing thru.
      @magnusberge you do have a point that the AT guns contribute nothing on an all-infantry force. But at the same time, battlefield conditions doesn't always stay the same throughout the game. There will be always a possibility that the opponents would use light vehicles (LVs) or tanks to catch someone off-guard after a long-winded infantry combat.
      I think the saying "better to be prepared for something that may never happen than prepare nothing at all" applies here.
      Frankly, I prefer Panzerjagers and then prepare AT guns when tanks do appear, with the former still capable of anti-infantry at some extent and the flexibility of dealing LVs diving from an unexpected direction.

    • @magnusberge
      @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fredg7296 yes, but you prepare 1 AT gun not 3

  • @naksachaisaejane1982
    @naksachaisaejane1982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I personally want to see you play brits commando. I watched plenty of videos and very rarely they are air-sea group. I want to see you giving it a spin.

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i put it on the to do list. but so far no good games came out :(

  • @magnusberge
    @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    14:14 So you entire army is anti-tank units and "mortar" units vs a enemy force of 99% infantry, so you build even more "mortars" ?? dude, re-orgenize and get anti infantry at this point, your doing nothing but letting this guy walk all over you. These mortar attacks are doing "nothing" beacuse you dont have any units to follow up on the space they create, so the enemy just heals up again and you just wasted ammo and time, when a enemy moves cuz of mortars or airstrikes etc. they give up there good position and space, space that you can now move inn to take from them and gain ressourses and better positions, but you dont do this

    • @icemanUH
      @icemanUH 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They won a game 99% of others would have lost. And if all your mates are heavy on anti inf, but don't have strong anti tank, you will pay also the price.

    • @magnusberge
      @magnusberge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@icemanUH yea but you dont lean this heavy into 1 counter strategi when there is zero information that its needed, get 1 sure, then build more if you se the enemy build more tanks etc. They won where 99% would have lost sure but he also put himself into that losing situvation in the 1st place

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      hard to say. yes maybe more infantry would have been better. i wasn't alone down there. my flak was also still there. the problem is usually that i lose to mass tanks in the late game. and on the elo there are always mass tanks. i wanted to deny that directly. but yes there is always room for improvement.

    • @rinkydinkis5134
      @rinkydinkis5134 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      why do you always post like 4 separate criticisms on each video? do you type them while watching before even finishing the video?

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rinkydinkis5134 thanks @rinkydinkis5134. yes he does. that's ok. he helps me find weaknesses in my gameplay (sometimes it sucks^^) but he only means well.

  • @Prince-Of-Persia
    @Prince-Of-Persia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I bet some of these people here trying to teach you how to play cannot survive 10 minutes in these type of games

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i don't know. i'm always happy about constructive criticism.

  • @mocha8sugar
    @mocha8sugar 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    good game.

  • @nl4770
    @nl4770 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For high elo, you guys sure do clump your shit together. Fun watch!

  • @ABC-nw2tj
    @ABC-nw2tj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    first :)

    • @FISH-cl6sx
      @FISH-cl6sx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yeses

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      GG & thanks for the subscription! :)

    • @ABC-nw2tj
      @ABC-nw2tj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Achilles-Gaming

  • @IlOssoIl
    @IlOssoIl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please bro learn to play properly. Control your units normally, retreat in time and don’t stand in one place.

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I try it^^ is not always so easy :)

    • @IlOssoIl
      @IlOssoIl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Achilles-Gaming I ask with good intentions. You always need to have 4 infantry detachments, 2 engineers, 1-2 anti-tank units depending on the situation, and then see for yourself.

    • @Prince-Of-Persia
      @Prince-Of-Persia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Achilles is a gold player mate ,I think he knows how to play properly as I played with him few times ,easy to comment and criticize without being in a game full of challengers just look at the end damage dealt by him against those challengers

    • @IlOssoIl
      @IlOssoIl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Prince-Of-Persia Believe me, I’m not just giving advice from the outside, but as a player of a fairly high level. I proceed from the motives of improving his game and nothing more.

    • @rinkydinkis5134
      @rinkydinkis5134 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you really didnt provide much advice to improve. a bronze player could have given the insight you have provided here.@@IlOssoIl

  • @FISH-cl6sx
    @FISH-cl6sx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    NOOOO ROMEL I WANT MORE WERMACHT GAMEPLAY!!!

  • @kietay6505
    @kietay6505 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    high ELO and 4v4 in the same sentence is an oxymoron. Only bad players play team game mode.

    • @strategist6962
      @strategist6962 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sure buddy

    • @Prince-Of-Persia
      @Prince-Of-Persia 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I see some 1vs1 legends that not good in team games , its like you saying football players or basketball players and other players in team games are bad because they dont play solo !!!!!

    • @rinkydinkis5134
      @rinkydinkis5134 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      those guys had 70% winrates in all modes including 1v1.

    • @kietay6505
      @kietay6505 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rinkydinkis5134 Damn this game must have a tiny player base for someone so bad to have a win rate like that.

    • @Achilles-Gaming
      @Achilles-Gaming  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you have to take a look at the stats of the players. some of them are challengers in all 4 areas. winning stats 70%+...