Just How Powerful is AGM-65 Maverick Missile
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2019
- The AGM-65 Maverick is a precision-attack missile for the air, naval and marine forces of 30 countries. Maverick is certified for use on more than 25 aircraft, including helicopters, fighters, attack and patrol aircraft. More than 69,000 missiles have been produced to date, and more than 6,000 have been used in combat, with 93 percent accuracy.
Maverick configurations are based on three seekers - television, infrared and laser - and two warhead sizes. The missile’s guidance software provides attack capability around-the-clock against fixed high-value targets, high-speed moving and maneuvering armored vehicles, ships and fast boats, and targets of opportunity. Targets of opportunity provide all-altitude point-and-shoot flexibility ideally suited for time-critical strike in urban close air support and maritime operations.
Other videos you might like:
5 Reasons The Marine Corps is The Future Of U.S. Ground Combat ► • 5 Reasons Why the U.S....
why the US Air Force Might Need More F-35s ► • Here's why the U.S. Ai...
5 Lethal US Weapons of War RUSSIA Wished It Had ► • 5 Lethal US Weapons of...
5 Reasons the U.S. Military Will Make You DEAD ► • Wanna Fight AMERICA? 5...
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► th-cam.com/users/USMilitaryN...
Thank you so much for always supporting US - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[UNCUT] ฝันรักห้วงนิทรา | EP.11 (3/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4oyX6CnuonM/mqdefault.jpg)
Nice use of DCS world for the demo.
I loaded these weapons on F4's during the cold war, back then it was top secret, no pictures or talk off the work area about this bad boy..
Wow
Scott Revell noice
Thank you for your service sir.
The cold war? Wasn't put into service until 1972
@@slobama
The Cold War lasted from 1947 to 1991.
Wait wait, there’s a missile that’s effective against big tanks of fuel? What wonders will our scientists come up with next?
Solar planes
Shooting Marine to the moon
I've fired a lot of Mavericks in my time . . . while playing iF-16, Janes USAF, and F-22 Lightning 3.
Liar, f22 lightning 3 didn't have Mavericks. It had wonderful nukes instead.
So, what is the upper limit to the number of Mavericks that should be carried on a mission? Do you tend to run out of fuel before you run out of missiles?
There was a planned, but never produced (due to the end of the Cold War) heavily modified version that essentially changed it into a small cruise missile: Tacit Rainbow. It switched out the solid fuel engine for an air-breathing turbojet engine. The seeker was changed to home in on enemy radar signals, and it would have carried a spherical blast fragmentation warhead. It had a long loiter capability, so when launched, the aircraft could leave, or engage another target. That way if the enemy radar operators detected a launch and shut down their emitters, the missile would go into standby loiter mode, and wait for them to be turned back on, then home in. Worked perfectly in the lab and testing, but, again, end of the cold war = no more bucks.
AGM-136A
Definitely one of my favourite weapons, known from the U.S. armament. And can be launched from one of the best CAS carriers - the magnificent A-10!
People say the A-10 was ugly, when I sort of a 10 it was beautiful and then when I learned what she was capable of oh, I fell in love, with the warthog
Brings back the memories at RAF Bentwaters when we had to do the inspections on all AGM-65s we had in inventory. I was present when we had D model guidance upgrade with laser capability which lead to the development of the laser guided bombs. The bombs are actually cheaper and will do the same job without the propulsion.
How did you enjoy serving there?
Worked with Agm 65A in1982/84 ,USAFE.
Enjoyed your video and gave it a Thumbs Up
I had to rewind when DCS appeared. So odd seeing my flight sim outside the normal gaming channels.
What's d.c.s.?
BandoCommando EastSideTrue313 the greatest mil sim and its free
@@jacobsmith4453 I'll check it out my man I appreciate you answering back! Thank u!!!!♡
@@detroitfettyghost8492 ever wanted to fly, a fighter (like f14/15/16/18) or cas like the a10a/c, as realistic as possible? digital combat simulator is the only game that achieves that
takes a shitton of time to learn and master just one of the planes but its worth
and the above mentioned jets arent even all su25/27/29, the jf17, mirage2000, a couple of helos i think, the harrier.
in addition to that you have the most in depth sam and ground vehicle variety on the ground to back all of that up
@@julianviefers6703 Thank you so much! I might have to look into it, sounds like a real challenge but very fun when mastered!
Sam Wilson is the greatest narrator ever! I hate when I start watching something and hear robot-voice, I liked and subscribed as a thank you for not doing that!
Yeah dude i wish they would ban all those stupid waste of server space channels.
You would never hear a British narrator sounding remotely like him.
Very reliable missile. Always hits the target. We are obtaining new missiles every week.
I received a class on close support aircraft, and the munitions they carried. We saw a video of the testing of the Maverick. It hit a M-48 series tank. It spread that 48 all over the place. The instructor told us that the Maverick contained no explosives, and the only thing on the target was hydraulic fluid, oil, and fuel.
Allen Mitchell if it was a dummy, test round.
Good to hear human narration! well done!
Worked great against a building across the Tigris River in Baghdad. We called in an Airstrike on said building due to a sniper pinning us down. Navy F/A-18 came in and took out the building, using the Maverick. Needless to say, no more sniper.😊
Very american approach: "Sir, there is enemy in that city" "What city?" "Nevermind, it's gone"
It's been around a long time !! And still relevant !!
@museack Lol, Yes he is !!
Never give up the cannon on the A10, never
Not a Canon it's a 7 barreled Vulcan Gatling gun
@museack as an aircraft weapon systems specialist for 6 years we never called it a cannon kind of like this is my rifle this is my gun this is for fighting this is for fun
@@brenttate9299
It is a rotary cannon.
Su 25 is much better
@museack well I guess if you have children you are. Just because the news media and everybody else is called at the wrong thing doesn't make it right. Here's an example here's an item that has changed name three times in my lifetime. When Henry Ford first produced it he called it a circuit breaker then it became known as points now today you better tell that Parts person a contact set so which is correct
Finally a vid that’s not exactly 10 mins
Well at least we got to see the missile destroy something. I love this guys voice the narrator he is fantastic. Go USA
Yes. Lively, crisp voice.
It would be quite effective against an enemy that has a warning for radar missiles if you used it against them from above for things like choppers. I'd imagine the IR one would be best for it. A-10s used to use the IR maverick to find targets at night because it can see better than just NOD. It was really used for scuds.
The prevalence of IR guided missiles in Air-to-Air combat has caused various nations to develop something called MAWS - Missile Approach Warning System. This forms the avionics package for most new military aircraft, alongside the more traditional RDR (Radar warning receiver). To a pilot, an incoming missile is as much of a threat if it's fired from another aircraft, or from the ground (SAMs or MANPADs). I guess, technically, the AAM could be a slightly greater threat, as the missile would have the added energy from the aircraft. Although, the SAMs (though NOT the MANPADs) would have the advantage of not being limited in size, due to the launch platform and could thus have more powerful rockets, thus giving the missile more energy than an aircraft flying at MACH 2.
So I guess we're back to where we started - To a pilot, an incoming missile is as great a threat regardless of whether it's deployed from an incoming aircraft or from the ground. The MAWS device doesn't discriminate; It warns the pilot of ANY incoming missiles, regardless of whether they're AAMs or SAMs or even MANPAD missiles. I don't know this for certain, however, I would expect that this MAWS could be used by ground targets, to protect them from incoming AMGs. I DO know that APSs are supposed to be able to specifically defeat incoming missiles. The Russian Active Protection System (Arena-E and Afganit) is supposed to be able to defeat incoming threats (ie - missiles) with velocities of up to 3km/s. The Maverick missile is specifically named as a threat that it's capable of defeating.
Alternatively, Israel's Trophy APS doesn't have a maximum-intercept-velocity listed, however, it DOES boast a 100% successful intercept rate in all combat environments that it's been used in, over the last 14 years. This is BAD NEWS for wimpy AMGs, like the Hellfire missile and its wimpy 9kg warhead. However, the Maverick missile has a 60kg/ 140kg warhead and an APS defence would still detonate that warhead, albeit prematurely. Nevertheless, those being protected by the APS would need to be shielded from the large explosion created by the 140kg warhead. Tank crews would be reasonably safe. SAM crews inside an armoured, windowless cab would be safe. Anyone outside would be toast or red mist. Similarly, the AGM-88 HARM missile would be almost useless against SAMs protected by an APS and the 50kg warhead of the HARM wouldn't be enough to err... harm any of the crew or equipment (assuming a successful intercept). At least the Maverick missile and its hefty 140kg warhead would result in modest damage to equipment and the 'removal' of any unprotected personnel even after being successfully intercepted by an APS.
In summary, the AGM-65 kicks arse, it fucks arse and it looks for MORE arse!!! Lesser missiles are only good against the farmers of 3rd world nations, but Maverick missiles are good for anyone!!
@@Raz.C "In summary, the AGM-65 kicks arse, it fucks arse and it looks for MORE arse!!! Lesser missiles are only good against the farmers of 3rd world nations, but Maverick missiles are good for anyone!!" - In summary agm-65 maverick is retarded missile.
just watched the Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre and wanted to know about this monster Missile
Some of the info seems to have been lifted right from Wiki for this weapon, word for word. Or was it the other way around?
This video is as exciting as a training film.
Maverick was a genuinely revolutionary weapon in the 1970s and it remains effective in its later variants. However, your assertion that it is “normally carried on a three round cluster” is manifestly untrue (please note there aren’t any shots of one in the video). The A-10 can carry such a launcher, but rarely does in practice. It also suffers from being rather large and heavy in comparison to more modern weapons like Brimstone, which really is carried in triplets.
Actually we had the 3 round launchers...what a PIA to load and reload ( top off)...and the loaders hated them too. So very glad to see them go.
We had them for the F4E. (122FW. Blacksnakes )
Loading these on f/a 18’s is pretty fun. Annoying to download though but only cause I wanted the pilot to go blow some shit up.
(Active duty Navy AO over here lol)
They are usually never used on the 3 Rd.rack, The real world isn't a Tamiya model Lol, just one on a pylon is the norm !!
@Aerospace Exploration the a10s use the lighter version in up to triple racks, the heavier versions will be single mount
my favourite AG-missile
That's one powerful spitball
What happened to Maverick C?
God I love the A-10...such a great support plane. GO HAWGS.
Some old aircraft pictured here. F-20 Tigershark and the F-16XL (the one showing the underside with 6 Mavericks), both of which didn't go in to production.
Steve Turner Was checking the comments just to see if anyone else noticed the F-16XL
I liked the human voice. Good video
Very interesting video.
this fighter looks beautiful
Probably the rarest jet in the world! If i'm not mistaken it;s an F-16 XL variant (02:34)
My favorite air to ground missile
good job
GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES AND GOD BLESS THE U.S. MILITARY 💒🎄👍👏👏
Thank you.
@blue heeler And you live in fucking North korea i suppose?
Cool 😎
@New World Disorder child what?
museack How about you get off TH-cam, you sound like a racist, oh wait you are one.
I bet that thing makes a loud bang.
Damn, just damn.
DCS is becoming very popular to the point it's now used for military aircraft footage
Is this a joke?
@@mariolisa2832 if it wasn’t, what are you gonna do?
I think this is the missile with delayed fuse penetrator heavy warhead variant....I could be wrong though
It's like maverick awesome as hell
How about bristone missile
No telling how many soviet tanks and BMPs I destroyed playing "A10 Tank Buster", (or something like that anyway) using Mavericks back in the 90's. Weapon of choice on Hogs in the day. Don't know how well they could knock out a tank in real life, but rarely, if ever, failed to in the game.
technolgy is good i bealive the us is there to protect all pepole 👍
@Ivana Notyers thank you dreams are real
So we just going to ignore that at 3:21 the missile hits in front of the target instead of on the target?
...still, a KILL shot!
I wasnt aware they still used these.
Doesn’t mention F-18s use them, shows an F-18 using them..
Showed a harrier and an f20 also, and used to carry them on the A7s, along with British typhoon and desault rafele
How it works?
3:20 that poor M901 :C
My mom used to build those at hughes back in the 80s.
@museack actually those are the ones that were made with love.
i love the Maverick missile!
What size in pounds is each missile warhead explosive size?
They have 2 sizes of warheads. 136lbs. And 300lbs.
museack no it’s not
Awsome
Hey I recognize that Spang missile shop! IYAAYAS
Just rename it to AMG-65 and it will not only be powerful but luxurious too.
Lol good one
Maverick C was my favourite....
AGM'S here:Some types can destroy almost a small town.
Agm's in cod mw2: *targets its own company and himself*
Price:Check your fire!
I don’t follow…
So, how powerful is it then?
Was notorious during the Iran-Iraq War ... Iraqi crews would abandon their vehicles at the mere sight/sound of an F-4E coming low over the horizon.
Just realized it's the Wikipedia article word by word. Still cool :)
Nice to see the US Military News are playing DCS World :D
3:04 LOL
5:53 Phil air force FA-50 😊
moayed adal Cool observation, I wonder if they will use it as an anti ship missile...
@@omarlagasca7487 yes, last june 25 they did an exercise live firing near the Spratlys. The footage will be shown on July 1, PAF's anniversary.
Philippine Air Force FA-50’s demonstrated its capability to fire this missile & hit a ship successfully.
Last I heard the Maverick was replaced by some other missile
Just how powerful is the maverick missile? Ask Qassem Soleimani. Sweet dreams General.
That was a couple hellfire RX9s. Basically a missile with fucking katanas attached to them.
Weather it was a couple of Hellfire missiles or Maverick missiles that deciced to take out a couple of jihadis on a cool fall evening. At this point what difference does it make?
Huawei is a criminal organization. Any super power has the capability to kill an unarmed people in the third countries. What a shame of USA
@Huawei is a criminal organization. he got his virgins, but they all look like Woopie Goldberg.
The solamander was blown to pieces biggest part found was a tooth
so when will iceman get a missile named after him?
the light warhead weighs 126lbs in a shaped charge. compared to the agm-114 hellfire that has a 20lb warhead its 5xs more powerful and the agm-114 is considered to be able to kill any MBT in the world so if a 20lb shaped charge can do that then the 126lb warhead is probably like 5 amg-114s at once. so its very powerful and thats not even considering the 300lb warhead.
Fun Fact: This is the missile that made an appearance in Man Of Steel at the end of Smallville battle
So what is the major differences between the Maverick and the hellfire missiles?
From what I know they are a lot the same... But you can just look it up and see for yourself
they are different missiles. AGM 114 vs 65
@@tektkite7255
hi T K...
'
who is a word - THEY -
@@thesirmaddog8209
hi T S...
'
who is THEY
@@bestamerica your mom
Which GPU are they using?
Depends on the model. The video covers that.
A bit outdated if you have to choose missile on time , proximity or impact ..that should be available from within the aircraft. If the guidance system for sea is the same it may also mean it is not sea skimming..and that is really bad. They do a job but you dont want to rely on what was planned beforehand without possibilities to take initiative..no conflict works that way.
Hypersonic maverick rockets is what they should build
"Launch and Leave?" lol, it's called "Fire and Forget." Geez..
It says Launch and Leave in the Technical Order though.
Does the US still operate conventional gravity bombs?
Great, informative video. At 3:34 the F20? Lovely, brilliant aircraft but never made it into service (only 3 ever produced). Doesn't add to credibility to show unadopted aircraft using the missile.
VERY!
Very cool video. But why are half of the ground crew fat (hog bodies)?
Taco Tuesday is now a worldwide phenomenon? ;)
Sometimes I wonder how are all these information "de-classified" for the public. Guys who have been in the vault should know...
Quite disappointed with the title. I expected to find some badass moves - like crazy things getting blown up here and there
Let's see a damage and explosion video
You just went to wiki and read the text out!
'
that great AGM-65 Maverick...
keep up american company must makeing many more better AGM-65 to AGM-100 mavericks
Impressive computerized voice I’ve never heard it before
I think it’s an actual person, if its a computer, it’s very very good.
It's a guy! SAM WILSON is da name♡
zırhlı araçlar için biraz büyük bi bomba....güzel görünüyor
The missile knows where it is because it knows where it is not
The missiles doesn't care where it or where the target is. It just wants to be where the target is........and the Maverick is usually pretty good at doing that.
We used it against ISIS in Marawi, Philippines outfitted into FA50
Will the Maverick still fire if we're on the ground?!?!?!
its a good missile but getting outdated, you should make a video on the agm-158
i mean from what im seeing the JASSM is just a cruise missile. not every job can be solved with a cruise missile, nor does it need to be. sometimes a maverick is really all you need.
@@PatrickRatman the 65 has problems and is old, jdams are more effective in that way, and it doesnt matter if it is a cruise as it still gets the mission done, the 65 still has great uses but is slowly getting replaced
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
AV-8B Harriers also fired this weapon in the movie True Lies
Is this the missile that Harriers use to take out the bridge in True Lies?
The Maverick top speed is classified
60 mph.
715mph or 1,150kph. No it’s not classified
Maverick the best,🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻👍🏽🦅🦅🦅
Never seen a F-16XL carrying AMRAAMs.
Wonder just how jealous goose will be????
Yeah