If AI plus an average employee equals a great employee, why would I hire a great employee who is more expensive? If I have four salespeople who spend 75 percent of their time selling and 25 percent doing paperwork and I can get AI to do the paperwork, why shouldn't I fire the worst salesperson and let the other three spend all of their time selling? I think AI will take over some jobs. I don't think it will be fast. I think it will be by attrition. As people leave they simply won't be replaced. Anyway, thanks for the thought provoking video. I am not a bot. At least not yet.
If AI plus an average employee equals a great employee, why would I hire a great employee who is more expensive? If I have four salespeople who spend 75 percent of their time selling and 25 percent doing paperwork and I can get AI to do the paperwork, why shouldn't I fire the worst salesperson and let the other three spend all of their time selling? I think AI will take over some jobs. I don't think it will be fast. I think it will be by attrition. As people leave they simply won't be replaced. Anyway, thanks for the thought provoking video. I am not a bot. At least not yet.