Oddball Postwar Lionel trains 6464-1 Western Pacific boxcars. Factory Errors and Rejects.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ม.ค. 2024
  • A look at some oddball Lionel 6464-1 postwar Western Pacific boxcars, Included are Factory errors and rejects that are fun to collect. Part of the Rare and unusual Lionel trains shown on this channel.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @johnandrus3901
    @johnandrus3901 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A very nice, informational video. The 6464 series was brought out because of the other manufacturers, especially AMT, producing O gauge cars that were scale or close to scale, compared to the Lionel offerings. They didn't quite match the AMT cars for scale size, but were close and were very nicely detailed. They did the same with the Super Speedliners, because of AMT's streamlined O gauge passenger cars, which Lionel didn't offer. I have a few of the 6464 cars, some original and some the reissues. They are good looking cars. Keep up the excellent videos.

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the comments and support. Yeah, Lionel was a little late to the party with these cars, but when they did, I like what they did. There is a reason they are highly collected. I have many more oddballs to show over the next few years. Glad you enjoyed it. Brian.

  • @markkilgore938
    @markkilgore938 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The unstamped car has staple end trucks. This had to be super early production because staple end trucks were discontinued prior to 1953. Very interesting and informative.

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, the unstamped car is a factory reject shell and appears to have been put together post factory. Thanks for the comment and support. Brian.

  • @TooManyHobbiesJeremy
    @TooManyHobbiesJeremy 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Great to see some nice examples. Thanks for the video.

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah, the 6464-1 has numerous variations and oddballs, fun to collect. Thanks.Brian

  • @raysrails2164
    @raysrails2164 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful video, I just started collecting the 6464 series .

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the comment. Love the 6464 cars and so much cool stuff out there. Keep in touch and maybe we can meet up at York and talk trains. Brian.

  • @stevenmiller5696
    @stevenmiller5696 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice presentation! Thanks

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Appreciate the comment. Neat cars for sure. Thanks. Brian

  • @SOU6900
    @SOU6900 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I got my first 6464 coming in the mail tomorrow.

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Congratulations, Love the series and really fun to collect. Project roar is working on a new 6464 book due out in 2025, keep an eye out for it. Enjoy. Brian

  • @NPFIlms-LionelTrains
    @NPFIlms-LionelTrains 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You should do Factory errors for MPC Lionel! I've got a Rio Grande boxcar that's missing a black stripe on one side.

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the comment. This channel does mostly focus on Postwar Lionel. There are definitely some cool MPC factory errors and reject out there!. I have some really cool postwar ones to share including some incredible Rio Grande boxcar errors coming in future episodes. Brian.

  • @FailureatRetirement
    @FailureatRetirement 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Neat cars. I’m used to seeing the WP cars with a feather on the side. Did those come out later?

    • @BriansTrainRoom
      @BriansTrainRoom  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, the 6464-1 is a Western Pacific boxcar as shown. The 6464-100 is a Western Pacific as well, but with a silver body and a yellow feather across the side. It came out a year later. Thanks. Brian.

    • @FailureatRetirement
      @FailureatRetirement 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Okay , that makes sense because those are the ones I’m used to seeing. Thanks @@BriansTrainRoom