What is ur opinion? I ask question and got answer about chemical water quality by satellite, Excuse me, I have a question? I use equations for water quality like CU, Cr, NO2, NO3, BOD, COD... The question is here that I get this equation from Elsevier article. Satellites do not measure the chemical properties directly, so you cannot use such equations for water quality monitoring. Some water quality parameters are highly correlated with reflectances of light in different wavelengths, and thus you can build a regression model between satellite image bands and measured quality parameters (such as TSS) and use them to predict water quality😊
How you can use the term Volume monitoring while using sentinel 2 data? And actually you didn't do that in the video as well and you know better that volume calculation specifically for permanent water bodies without field work is impossible with normal RS data. Dont do that , I realy follow you but this kind of descieving tectics I dont like and specially in research ethichs. We should follow them. Thank you
What is ur opinion?
I ask question and got answer about chemical water quality by satellite,
Excuse me, I have a question? I use equations for water quality like CU, Cr, NO2, NO3, BOD, COD... The question is here that I get this equation from Elsevier article.
Satellites do not measure the chemical properties directly, so you cannot use such equations for water quality monitoring. Some water quality parameters are highly correlated with reflectances of light in different wavelengths, and thus you can build a regression model between satellite image bands and measured quality parameters (such as TSS) and use them to predict water quality😊
How you can use the term Volume monitoring while using sentinel 2 data?
And actually you didn't do that in the video as well and you know better that volume calculation specifically for permanent water bodies without field work is impossible with normal RS data.
Dont do that , I realy follow you but this kind of descieving tectics I dont like and specially in research ethichs.
We should follow them.
Thank you