I think I struck gold when I discovered these lectures. Really excited as I'm about to watch all your videos Professor Ali. You are a marvelous teacher
Hi professor Ali. I'm chatting from Brazil. I'm graduated in Electrical Engineering and often I revise some content in order to keep knowledge fresh in my head. I had some great professor in university, but I've never seen classes like yours. The more I watch you videos, the more I'm sure about that. Thank you for such awesome videos. Best regards
Such a brilliant instructor. Unbelievable how good you are at explaining things. Sir, could you please also do a course in electromagnetic theory or upload the videos of it if you have?
You are very kind. Currently, I am not planning to teach EM in the next year or so (although I would like to one day). I will keep you posted if something changes.
Absolutely brilliant series of lectures. Having graduated 20+ years ago, this comprehensive "brush-up" is far exceeding my expectations.. the holistic view on the matter and for once actually starting from the maxwell equations and really building in steps from there: fantastic. Easy your heart out netflix, these lectures are my new binge series. Equal to the best set of math classes when i was at university that started with a single line on the board, then a zero was added, and it evolved from there to all these nasty complex things over a period of 2 years. This is how stuff - any stuff - should be taught. My utmost respect to you sir!
Thank you so mcuh for sharing such high quality lectures to the public! Do you have any intention of offering a MOOC in the future? If you do, that'll be the first Verified Certificate I'd get!
Hi Ali, as you correctly explained when there is varying magnetic flux then E field is not conservative hence no potential is defined. However, when circuits with inductors are analyzed we implicitly use KVL. Inductors produce varying magnetic field so the potential measured would depend on probing points. Am i missing something?
because of the fact that the current gets provided at a terminal of minute magnitude and a relatively larger amount of gets flow among the other terminals and that is the current which matters. In retrospect what actually happened was that the device generated more current than what it gets supplied
I think I struck gold when I discovered these lectures. Really excited as I'm about to watch all your videos Professor Ali. You are a marvelous teacher
Thank you. You are very kind.
Dr. Hajimiri, I'm a physics major at Penn (Philadelphia), going through these lectures has been an adventure, thank you!
Time Stamps:
0:00 = Review
6:32 = Passivity, Activity
17:33 = Reactivity
27:42 = Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
33:53 = Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
43:15 = Ideal Sources
Hi professor Ali. I'm chatting from Brazil. I'm graduated in Electrical Engineering and often I revise some content in order to keep knowledge fresh in my head. I had some great professor in university, but I've never seen classes like yours. The more I watch you videos, the more I'm sure about that. Thank you for such awesome videos. Best regards
Sir , students fall in love with the subject because ur teaching skills and attitude is excellent... Great work sir
this way of think a parallel voltages sources, i think was one of the most exiting moments of my life.. this teacher is a artist
Thank you, Sir. I bow down to your patience to hear from your students & passion to teach.
Such a brilliant instructor. Unbelievable how good you are at explaining things. Sir, could you please also do a course in electromagnetic theory or upload the videos of it if you have?
You are very kind. Currently, I am not planning to teach EM in the next year or so (although I would like to one day). I will keep you posted if something changes.
Absolutely brilliant series of lectures. Having graduated 20+ years ago, this comprehensive "brush-up" is far exceeding my expectations..
the holistic view on the matter and for once actually starting from the maxwell equations and really building in steps from there: fantastic. Easy your heart out netflix, these lectures are my new binge series.
Equal to the best set of math classes when i was at university that started with a single line on the board, then a zero was added, and it evolved from there to all these nasty complex things over a period of 2 years.
This is how stuff - any stuff - should be taught. My utmost respect to you sir!
Thank you Mr. Hajimiri. This is treasure right before me. Intend to complete all! Thanks a ton! :)
Awesome!
بنازم آقا علی❤️
Thank you so mcuh for sharing such high quality lectures to the public! Do you have any intention of offering a MOOC in the future? If you do, that'll be the first Verified Certificate I'd get!
Can anyone tell me that which book did he recommend on Networks and Circuit analysis during the course ? Any Response would be very helpful. Thanks.
Love from india sir❤️
Kindly , Can you say which reference that you work with ?
How 🤔 ❓
.
.
.
.
.
How you're superb 👌
thank you sir🥰
Hi Ali, as you correctly explained when there is varying magnetic flux then E field is not conservative hence no potential is defined. However, when circuits with inductors are analyzed we implicitly use KVL. Inductors produce varying magnetic field so the potential measured would depend on probing points. Am i missing something?
I didn't understand the final answer for the two ideal voltage sources in parallel.Sir could you please answer.
It is a mathematical impossibility. Putting two ideal voltage sources in parallel is like writing 3=5!
@@AliHajimiriChannel Thank you Sir
Sir, can you please explain why transistors are active elements. TIA.
because of the fact that the current gets provided at a terminal of minute magnitude and a relatively larger amount of gets flow among the other terminals and that is the current which matters. In retrospect what actually happened was that the device generated more current than what it gets supplied
which microphone are u using?
lavalier microphone :) for example from rode.
Could you add subtitle for deaf person ? Thank you.