How does it make you feel to know Fasusi literally signed with ou because he would sit at Texas for a year or 2. How does that make truly make you feel?
I think 16 is because it’s only 17 players plus not sure Fasusi was factored. Venables said they have 80+ players that are Freshman or Sophomores so not gonna be much room with the 105 players cap.
@@williebates3398 well it has something to do with it. The more players you have the higher your points. Every team a head of us has 20+ players. Oregon is killing it tho with 4 5 stars.
@DredNeck45 lmfao, so Oklahoma should be way down in ranking based solely on the number of recruits? Then why is South Carolina with 24 players signed ranked right behind Oklahoma? There are several good programs behind Oklahoma with more recruits my guy.
@ that’s not what I meant. Each player contributes points based on their ranking. So if we would have signed 10 more players we would have a much higher ranking. It’s not an average score it’s an accumulative score. This wasn’t an excuse for Oklahoma being low it was just an observation on past rankings being higher.
The community note on that tweet. 🤣
Hell yea man 😂😂😂😂😂
Work and build....don't forget that steak...
How does it make you feel to know Fasusi literally signed with ou because he would sit at Texas for a year or 2. How does that make truly make you feel?
@@corypeacock556 feels good. Real good
I think 16 is because it’s only 17 players plus not sure Fasusi was factored. Venables said they have 80+ players that are Freshman or Sophomores so not gonna be much room with the 105 players cap.
It's with Fasusi, Oklahoma stalled at the 16th best class. It doesn't have anything to do with just 17 signed.
@@williebates3398 well it has something to do with it. The more players you have the higher your points. Every team a head of us has 20+ players. Oregon is killing it tho with 4 5 stars.
@DredNeck45 lmfao, so Oklahoma should be way down in ranking based solely on the number of recruits? Then why is South Carolina with 24 players signed ranked right behind Oklahoma? There are several good programs behind Oklahoma with more recruits my guy.
@ that’s not what I meant. Each player contributes points based on their ranking. So if we would have signed 10 more players we would have a much higher ranking. It’s not an average score it’s an accumulative score. This wasn’t an excuse for Oklahoma being low it was just an observation on past rankings being higher.