Michel Foucault, Technologies of The Self | Four Types of Technologies | Philosophy Core Concepts
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Get Foucault's Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth - amzn.to/2XqxdsH
Support my work here - / sadler
Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordp...
Take classes with me - reasonio.teach...
This is a video in my new Core Concepts series -- designed to provide students and lifelong learners a brief discussion focused on one main concept from a classic philosophical text and thinker.
This Core Concept video focuses on Michel Foucault's short piece "Technologies of the Self", and discusses specifically the four types of technology he distinguishes early on in the work - those of production, sign-systems, power, and the self.
If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/...
If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Foucault's thought and works - click here: reasonio.wordp...
You can find the text I am using for this sequence on Foucault's Technologies of the Self here - amzn.to/2XqxdsH
My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
#Foucault #technology #philosophy
(Amazon links are associate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases)
Keen to see more Foucault videos!
Well, there are more lined up to be produced and released
Thank you so much you really broke everything down for me. I was so confused on what he meant now I have clarity. You helped me complete my humanities class I now have an A.
Nice. Glad it was helpful
I'm so happy to have found this dude. Very glad you are still with us and teaching
Glad you enjoy the videos!
had to do a double take when I saw you uploaded a video on Foucault. Exciting.
Looking forward to whatever more you have planned!
I cover a wide range. Released some other Foucault from another class last summer to Patreon supporters
Yes sir Deleuze lectures would do a lot of help plz
Cool - then commission them
Thank you!
You're welcome!
I always felt that the mind is so often cruel to the body as a technology of self in my experience. I try to reverse the programming my quieting my mind when it tries to judge my body for doing what it needs to do, such as sleeping when I need to sleep rather than forcing a deadline. then when the body is given first consideration, my mind is later on more effective.
Wish Foucault would've used the term ‘systems’ instead of ‘technologies’ I understand his work was all pre-digital era, but it's hard not to think of tech, when using that term generically today. Systems, seems to me, is a broader yet simpler use of language as a descriptor.
But IDK maybe that's just me
I’m sure you can handle him using a term. If you can’t, maybe don’t complain about it here
Philosophers will often use a term that fits their conception of a thing, rather than the normal use of the term. So "technologies" (I think) is meant to imply that it's a tool for doing something, but that it's also been designed itself.
So within the "technology" metaphor, a screwdriver is a tool that does a thing, and someone designed the screwdriver. It's both created and a creator.
Unpacking the metaphor, the self is an entity that does things in the world, and something that we constantly redesign and edit. That same for language, or politics, education, and so on.
0:48 ... Patreon Subscriber Hyperlink
Thank you for this video!! Helped me with my last minute essay a lot!!
nice video!
Thanks
Reminds me of Burke's four fundamental tropes of rhetoric. They're all linked together in their figurative quality but have defined structures to them as well. The beginning where you were describing what is meant by 'matrices of practical reason' reminded me about the kind of classifications and distinctions that go into tropes. Obviously "modern" tropes very much have that cultural experience of subjugation tied to them as well.
Yes, there's many different "fours" out there, I suppose
it takes me a lot of effort to read Foucault, this is so helpful! Thank you from Taiwan!
You're welcome!
Hi Dr Sadler, I recently got Otto Rank Art and Artist. If you’ve already read it, can you please do a book review on it?
You can certainly commission videos, if you want to pay for my resource of time
@@GregoryBSadler can I get a link with more information?
@@OpenHearthur No, since I don’t have that as something linked to. You can email me at greg at ReasonIO dot com, and I can send you the standard commissions fee chart.
Relatively few potential commissioners choose to do that once they find out what it costs, though
Studying for my PhD in sociology and got told to read up on technologies... Baffling at first, but this video has been very helpful!! Thanks a lot ❤
You might watch the whole set on Foucault's piece then
I like thinking and people who are thinking
Thank you so much for this video - really helpful. I just have one question if that's okay? Please can you explain, 'in what way is Foucault's work on power elliptical?'
No idea what you mean by "elliptical".
I don't tend to have much to say to questions about someone's entire work here in TH-cam
how do I cite this?
th-cam.com/video/kSnxvnrCHLw/w-d-xo.html
INTERESTED TO SEE VIDEOS ON ANCIENT PHILOSPHERS LIKE PLATO, SOCRATES AND DIOGENES CAN YOU PLEASE POST THESE VIDEOS TOO
Stop using all caps. And start using your brain, and searching for what you're asking for, before asking for what's already there
@@GregoryBSadler Yeah i found them and ae really useful
Cool!
I love your videos
Glad to read it!
Valuable lecture Sir, thank you, hope you discuss the shift of the Humanism stance towards the Dataism one
I will discuss the text. That's not in that text, so no
That's quite helpful too
@@musclesforher1052 Hopefully so!