Awesome. For some reason, I feel like I could watch armored vehicles drive around and shoot all day. You know how some people feel relaxed from looking at a waterfall or something? Armored vehicles have that effect on me.
For a APC, this upgrade will turn it into a mini-tank of sorts. While it doesn't have the thick armor or the big cannon of a tank, it's light weight, fast, and that 30mm cannon will hit hard, augmented by that 7.62mm PKM (mostly for Anti-personal and unarmored vehicles to save on 30mm ammo)
Infra-red needs an IR illuminator. Thermal imagers are more passive and doesn't give away the vehicle position. Either way, both would still be good on it. Thanks for the comment on this nice video. PeAcE oUt.
Because of the immense pressure and velocity, the skull would literally explode on impact. If it hits the body (upper torso in example), i believe everything would just be crushed and torn and maybe ripped out.
And actualy of cource ground pressure isn`t all for better offroad performance. Sadly but tracks can`t alter its rotation speed and power while for example MZKT-7922 can change it on every wheel as so as alter pressure in every single wheel as it is needed In addition to much larger clearance - it makes wheeled chassis MUCH better on soft soil with many hills and obstacles
BTR was infantry carrier which role was and is to cover infantry from firearms and shrapnel - and it is succesful in it`s role - plus configuration of bottom and wheels providing protection against mines more than some of MBTs dude - and BTR can move even without 2 wheels on each side. As so as is can swim at 10km/h while Stryker can`t at all. And upgraded with this turret it have firepower even greater that your precious Bradley
I think amongst all the "big gun" fitted APCs, the CV90-120 would be the most successful. The interchangeability of parts with other CV-90s is a big plus. I have also heard that the Swedish is developing a high penetration 40mm round, able to tackle MBT armor.
Dude they aren`t converted to IFV - they are STILL APC - thats the case. And sadly for M2 Bradley which IS IFV - those BTR-60 and 80 with new turret have A LOT more firepower that Bradley with it`s slow firing 25mm cannon. Russian IFV is BMP-3 - which have firepower comparable to modern MBTs, can swim and can be droped airborne with crews already inside. Also BMP-3 and BMD-4 carry 5 troopers
Soo .... Where do I buy one? Turret and all .... I can imagine driving this shit everyday her "HONEY, CAN YOU PICK UP THE KIDS?" me "Sure thing babe" 10 minutes later me "Oh you were bullied again? And the principle didn't do anything? Oh dear, we must tell those ruffians how we feel" kid "okay daddy, can I use it this time?" me "sure thing" After a couple thousand rounds, in addition to running through the walls of the school me "I hope you feel better kiddo" kid "Yep! I sure do dad! You're the best!" Cue silly 70's sitcom theme music and laugh track
***** Very unlikely, but i did some math and it costed around 4000€ to bring it in Italy. Not sure about countries outside Europe, but the guys seemed to be quite honest and professional. www (dot) mortarinvestments (dot) eu
I wonder,does this model still have 2x GAZ 53 engines,which are tuned, a Supe-MAZ engine (tuned KaMAZ engine) or anything new.I dare to say,does it have the JAMZ-238HD as the mammoth truck Kraz and the mobile artillery "Gvozdika"
aiming in similar cases ins't essential requirement as in case the 30 m canon fires it will be already engaging a tank or another APC not regular personnel
Held more men? Except for the the 60, the rest held 7 men...... a full squad in some countries, but less still. How's the space inside? And do you know why they chose to put the engine in the back?
Afghanistan and Chechnya showed that KPVT is good, but yet not enough to effectively suppress typical reinforced guerilla ambush positions in mountains or urban environment.
Banish these thoughts from your head. They're absolute rubbish. There is no similarity at all, not even aesthetically, save for the fact that both have 8 wheels.
@cuteshadowKIA BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew. However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war. Analog Stryker - BTR-90.
And actualy BTR-60 BARELY can be penetrated by 12,7 - and it was desighed to protect troops from firearms and shrapnel on the first place. And with new turret it can provide SIGNIFICANT firesupport. APC is not MBT - it has completely different purpose and you cant raise its protection forever not damaging its main functionality
True. I really wish the US army has adopted the M8 Buford instead - tracked, heavier armored (Titanium) and simply looks better. I believe the project is still alive - now renamed Thunderbolt AGS and fitted with a shortened auto-loading 120mm gun.
@vgotnofingers BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew. However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war. Analog Stryker - BTR-90.
Actualy - nope BTR have more road clearance, alterable wheel pressure, independent torsion suspension and diffential system for every wheel. That stuff allows BTR travel where even some tracked vehicles can`t go. Also that system more reliable eacy to maintain and have MUCH greater lifespan - tracks need to be replaced after each 2000-3000 km and they expencive
well the BTR was also made to be an amphibious vehicle, so i'd think they're want it too hold as many people as possible, it wasn't commonly used as that, but i know for a fact that there weren't alot of amphibious vehicles so you'd want to get as many in one as possible. Another reason, is that the BTR was created very soon after WW2, and even at post WW2, halftracks were still used, and the BTR's complete idea was off of them, and most Halftracks carry about 15 people. standardization i guess
Although I'm sure it would probably add to the weight, is there a version of this turret that can mount one or more antitank missiles in addition to the other armament? If it could, that'd be perfect. It would have suitable armament for most types of engagements.
It can be done with carbon fiber and plastics saving a lot of weight, using a cad softwares and a cam software could easily be recreated and simulated prior to manufacturing.
Most Russian trucks and machines use petrol,because they are intended to use in extreme conditions,like in Siberia,which is very cold.GAZ-53 truck for example,can start easily,even in -30 degrees,if the carburetor is tuned just right.
What is it about Russian weapon videos and music ? Almost all Russian military videos have more annoying music than sound from the motor/weapons. I am not interested in the music. Let me hear the motor and weapon systems. Are they more deadly with the head banging music?
Pantsir-S1 is better than any laser. Lasers has many limitations on weather, landscape, powersources e t c. Lasers good in space - but in athmosphere they sometimes useless as deadlyweapons.
There is very little improvement in terms of survivability; anything bigger than 7.62mm can penetrate the hull, and the petrol engine will caught fire easily if anything happen, that is why most military vehicle around the world utilizing diesel fuel. Anyway I am impressed with the firepower, it has been improved significantly. Although for me the original 14.5mm KPVT is powerful enough for such class of vehicle, at least the KPVT can penetrate the LAV (without module add-on armour).
Top quality? What do you mean? Better build? I don't know about that, but because you have to climb on the side of the vehicle to get in, you are a sitting duck for the enemy. It's just a hassle. It carries 16, which I love, but getting in and out is just a hassle.
Yes I think the M8 buford is a better all around vehicle, probably even better than the Sprut, btw the 120mm gun fitte on the thunderbolt is a low recoil 120mm and 55 calibers gun, the same as the leopard 2A6, AND LONGER THAN THE ONE FITTED ON THE M1 ABRAMS TANKS!!!, lastly some BTR-90 had been experimantally fitted with a BMP-3 turret, worse "big gun", but a 30mm auto-cannon to boot...
from a long time i want to buy a BTR-60 and to make with electricity engine but now this guys know what they are doing i really want to see the price for these upgrades
Awesome. For some reason, I feel like I could watch armored vehicles drive around and shoot all day. You know how some people feel relaxed from looking at a waterfall or something? Armored vehicles have that effect on me.
Would make one hell of a zombie/apocalypse survival vehicle. That's why I have 2 of the basic BDRM-2 vehicles in 1/35th scale.
How many people can sit in it?
deadfrontier240 Israel’s a country that commits more human right crimes then anyone less
You see what I have in my dayz base
@@lukedontknow9283 more than china?
Orbital Drop ok maybe they more like 7th
One of the best BTR vids i have seen.
Always impressed how quiet some of those are ,they can sneak up right on ya
Just put 4 Kornets on BRDM tower and you have a nice little tank hunter
Ehm... the 9P148 is producing from 1974
they exist, known as the brdm-2 spandrel and has 5 konkurs (sadly not kornets) atgms mounted on the top
And put som thermal vision and ERA
Holy Crap that Rate of Fire.
1:46 what a picture.
Crazy how easy these things get blown into tiny bits
1) yes it's 30 mm Gryazev-Shipunov's GSh-30 gun.
2) BTR-80A - is NBC-protected vehicle of course, it's just a standard for Soviet-Russian army.
its gun named 2A42
For a APC, this upgrade will turn it into a mini-tank of sorts. While it doesn't have the thick armor or the big cannon of a tank, it's light weight, fast, and that 30mm cannon will hit hard, augmented by that 7.62mm PKM (mostly for Anti-personal and unarmored vehicles to save on 30mm ammo)
best place ever to fire any weapons is definitely in a forest! love that echo after every round
Infra-red needs an IR illuminator. Thermal imagers are more passive and doesn't give away the vehicle position. Either way, both would still be good on it. Thanks for the comment on this nice video. PeAcE oUt.
@Guynumber7
A 23 mm auto-cannon , based on the re-barreled KPVT.
Love the new updated ones, that some serious firepower they've been given, now it's just waiting for them to mount an even larger gun on it.
Such an easy and effective upgrade. New diesel, some slat armor, and that thing is CE all over again
Because of the immense pressure and velocity, the skull would literally explode on impact. If it hits the body (upper torso in example), i believe everything would just be crushed and torn and maybe ripped out.
And actualy of cource ground pressure isn`t all for better offroad performance. Sadly but tracks can`t alter its rotation speed and power
while for example MZKT-7922 can change it on every wheel as so as alter pressure in every single wheel as it is needed
In addition to much larger clearance - it makes wheeled chassis MUCH better on soft soil with many hills and obstacles
BTR was infantry carrier which role was and is to cover infantry from firearms and shrapnel - and it is succesful in it`s role - plus configuration of bottom and wheels providing protection against mines more than some of MBTs dude - and BTR can move even without 2 wheels on each side. As so as is can swim at 10km/h while Stryker can`t at all. And upgraded with this turret it have firepower even greater that your precious Bradley
the freakin recoil from the main cannon pushed the entire apc backward! damn thats power!!!
Wow that thing has guns to engage almost every type of target.
I think amongst all the "big gun" fitted APCs, the CV90-120 would be the most successful. The interchangeability of parts with other CV-90s is a big plus. I have also heard that the Swedish is developing a high penetration 40mm round, able to tackle MBT armor.
What country upgraded that BTR-60?
It doesn't change the fact that while undeniably cool, these things are deathtraps when facing anyone armed with something more than small arms.
war is a big circle, there's always something that can take the other thing out.
Nice. Love the smoke!
When it fired the smoke I was expecting lag. Then I realized this isn't ARMA2
@ lol
Dude they aren`t converted to IFV - they are STILL APC - thats the case. And sadly for M2 Bradley which IS IFV - those BTR-60 and 80 with new turret have A LOT more firepower that Bradley with it`s slow firing 25mm cannon.
Russian IFV is BMP-3 - which have firepower comparable to modern MBTs, can swim and can be droped airborne with crews already inside. Also BMP-3 and BMD-4 carry 5 troopers
Brdm 2 is my favourite tank model 😍
BRDM-2 is not a tank
Soo .... Where do I buy one?
Turret and all ....
I can imagine driving this shit everyday
her "HONEY, CAN YOU PICK UP THE KIDS?"
me "Sure thing babe"
10 minutes later
me "Oh you were bullied again? And the principle didn't do anything? Oh dear, we must tell those ruffians how we feel"
kid "okay daddy, can I use it this time?"
me "sure thing"
After a couple thousand rounds, in addition to running through the walls of the school
me "I hope you feel better kiddo"
kid "Yep! I sure do dad! You're the best!"
Cue silly 70's sitcom theme music and laugh track
I seen a few pictures of civilians in Russia owing them for everyday use.
You can actually buy the vehicle from the Czech Republic for like, 9000 dollars.
***** Very unlikely, but i did some math and it costed around 4000€ to bring it in Italy. Not sure about countries outside Europe, but the guys seemed to be quite honest and professional.
www (dot) mortarinvestments (dot) eu
If you shot a building with this it would probably fall over.
Cool
Nice video, really love the brutal look and awesome design of russian vehicles and weapons 8D
Am I the only one who likes BTRs more than regular tanks
no
I like bdrm 2s
I wonder,does this model still have 2x GAZ 53 engines,which are tuned, a Supe-MAZ engine (tuned KaMAZ engine) or anything new.I dare to say,does it have the JAMZ-238HD as the mammoth truck Kraz and the mobile artillery "Gvozdika"
aiming in similar cases ins't essential requirement as in case the 30 m canon fires it will be already engaging a tank or another APC not regular personnel
Modern turret mounted on top of a vehicle so thinly armored that your average Eastern European village drunk can put his fist through it by accident.
i like the 30 mm cannon, how many rounds does the grenade launcher carry ?
Wow this is a pretty good Weapon for Troop protection.
Fantastic video! Very well done.
damn the gun's recoil nearly throws the entire BTR backwards
Actualy this video presents not exactly modified BTR-60
it is presentation of TURRET
this turret can be used as upgrade for all BTR series
Cool! Is the destructive firepower from the main cannon powerful enough to dent and blow up other tanks and vehicles?
Tanks no, some APCs and IFVs yes.
@psifactor12 The diameter of the barrel is the same, but the case that holds the propellant isn't, the projectile isn't and the gun itself isn't.
Remember, pick up your brass before leaving the range...
@Starr8492DS
No problem. Russia in the complex system of marking weapons, often different weapons and equipment assigned to the same indexes.
@alongthebluff Yes,two tuned GAZ-53 V8 engines.Although petrol,they can start very well under cold conditions and like the AK47,quite reliable.
Held more men? Except for the the 60, the rest held 7 men...... a full squad in some countries, but less still. How's the space inside? And do you know why they chose to put the engine in the back?
I came here to see BRDM shooting, I had no idea it had mounted grenade launcher, what nation uses that addition? Good vid, rare to see it firing.
It’s not a grenade launcher, it’s an auto cannon
@@polskabalaclava the smoke grenade launcher i meeant
Afghanistan and Chechnya showed that KPVT is good, but yet not enough to effectively suppress typical reinforced guerilla ambush positions in mountains or urban environment.
I think that 30mm gun is not GSh-30 is 2A42
2А82
The gsh-30 is used in the Mig-29 and the sukhoi's right
I just had this thought of BTR-60 series design beign inspired by WWII German Sdkfz 234/2 "Puma". The similarity is undeniable.
Banish these thoughts from your head. They're absolute rubbish. There is no similarity at all, not even aesthetically, save for the fact that both have 8 wheels.
at 1:07 is that the 23mm or the 14.5mm KPVT?
Maybe this is just me being a little stupid but is that a BTR 60PB (or 60) Hull with a BTR 82A Turret and a BMP 2 gun...?
That’s a BTR 60 hull
@cuteshadowKIA BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew.
However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war.
Analog Stryker - BTR-90.
How is vo do people by prodigy playing in the bg and not been demonitised
That is a scary beast.
And actualy BTR-60 BARELY can be penetrated by 12,7 - and it was desighed to protect troops from firearms and shrapnel on the first place.
And with new turret it can provide SIGNIFICANT firesupport.
APC is not MBT - it has completely different purpose and you cant raise its protection forever not damaging its main functionality
"Voodoo people" is a great track of course, but "Invader must die!" is much more suitable for this video ;)
-sir there is an enemy ifv there
-there was
True. I really wish the US army has adopted the M8 Buford instead - tracked, heavier armored (Titanium) and simply looks better. I believe the project is still alive - now renamed Thunderbolt AGS and fitted with a shortened auto-loading 120mm gun.
on bmp whats with 2 guns? also use the btr for aa work of helos or that just zsu
HOw are the sights on that awesome turret? Infra-red or thermal? Cool vid.
@vgotnofingers BTR is an analogue of the M-113. He gives the M-113 capacity and security of the crew.
However, superior to patency. Since it is easier to M-113. In the event of war with Russia M-113 would have just got stuck on Russian roads. And in the mountains of Afghanistan or Chechnya heavy M-113 would turn on the first corner. In addition, M-113 does not have the protection of radiation. It is unclear how the Americans planned to use it in case of nuclear war.
Analog Stryker - BTR-90.
What kind of engine upgrade was done? I know they initially came with twin air cooled petrol V6 engines. Did it get a diesel v8?
+Chris Butler One diesel V6 YaMZ-236NE - 230 HP, 882 Nm
That has to be better than the twin v6's that came in them originally what only able to run up to 194 HP paired?
vanilla BTR-60 engines - 2 petrol straight 6-cylinders GAZ-40P. Total engines power - 180HP, 422Nm
I thought they were twin v6? Could the BTR 90 power plant fit in this?
BTR-60 - 2 petrol R6, BTR-70 - 2 petrol V8, BTR-80 - 1 diesel V8, BTR-90 - 1 disel boxer 6 cilindrs
Actualy - nope
BTR have more road clearance, alterable wheel pressure, independent torsion suspension and diffential system for every wheel. That stuff allows BTR travel where even some tracked vehicles can`t go. Also that system more reliable eacy to maintain and have MUCH greater lifespan - tracks need to be replaced after each 2000-3000 km and they expencive
well the BTR was also made to be an amphibious vehicle, so i'd think they're want it too hold as many people as possible, it wasn't commonly used as that, but i know for a fact that there weren't alot of amphibious vehicles so you'd want to get as many in one as possible.
Another reason, is that the BTR was created very soon after WW2, and even at post WW2, halftracks were still used, and the BTR's complete idea was off of them, and most Halftracks carry about 15 people. standardization i guess
is that 30 ml cannon on the btr and is a nbc vechile
3 weapon system in 1 turret is a very good idea.
Terrible idea. The fewer, the better.
This model of BTR-60 still using two petrol engines?
"Kliver" makes a nice shots, these machines look mean with new equipment.
Actualy it is 2A42 30mm autocannon
Is this the standard backside of the BTR-60 or is this enlarged for a new engin?
Although I'm sure it would probably add to the weight, is there a version of this turret that can mount one or more antitank missiles in addition to the other armament? If it could, that'd be perfect. It would have suitable armament for most types of engagements.
It can be done with carbon fiber and plastics saving a lot of weight, using a cad softwares and a cam software could easily be recreated and simulated prior to manufacturing.
@Cennedi A single stryker is most likely better than a single BTR, but the same could be said about single german and russian WWII tanks.
an automatic grenade launcher is always nice to have!
Most Russian trucks and machines use petrol,because they are intended to use in extreme conditions,like in Siberia,which is very cold.GAZ-53 truck for example,can start easily,even in -30 degrees,if the carburetor is tuned just right.
thats pretty sick
What is it about Russian weapon videos and music ? Almost all Russian military videos have more annoying music than sound from the motor/weapons. I am not interested in the music. Let me hear the motor and weapon systems. Are they more deadly with the head banging music?
I love the sound of the gun
OMG, that is 14.5mm of devastating power. The .50 caliber is 12.7mm.
Pantsir-S1 is better than any laser. Lasers has many limitations on weather, landscape, powersources e t c. Lasers good in space - but in athmosphere they sometimes useless as deadlyweapons.
There is very little improvement in terms of survivability; anything bigger than 7.62mm can penetrate the hull, and the petrol engine will caught fire easily if anything happen, that is why most military vehicle around the world utilizing diesel fuel.
Anyway I am impressed with the firepower, it has been improved significantly. Although for me the original 14.5mm KPVT is powerful enough for such class of vehicle, at least the KPVT can penetrate the LAV (without module add-on armour).
The GSh-30 look no different from the 2A42.
you know, the all round perfect city vehicle when you get ambushed by the cartel...
Top quality? What do you mean? Better build?
I don't know about that, but because you have to climb on the side of the vehicle to get in, you are a sitting duck for the enemy. It's just a hassle. It carries 16, which I love, but getting in and out is just a hassle.
No they are probably using LAV-III or Stryker...very weaker than BTR series, for transport, but better for the electronic devices
Yes I think the M8 buford is a better all around vehicle, probably even better than the Sprut, btw the 120mm gun fitte on the thunderbolt is a low recoil 120mm and 55 calibers gun, the same as the leopard 2A6, AND LONGER THAN THE ONE FITTED ON THE M1 ABRAMS TANKS!!!,
lastly some BTR-90 had been experimantally fitted with a BMP-3 turret, worse "big gun", but a 30mm auto-cannon to boot...
SHIT! The gun is the shit man! its moving a 10 ton vehicle slightly backwards when firing, awesome!
They scared the crap out of me 35 years ago - I'm glad the USA has the Javelin.
am i the only one that knows thats a BTR-80A at the start?
Tell me - is M1 have good offroad performance?
It's Blyatiful comrade
music name: The Prodigy - Voodoo People
романтично ... цветочки, лютики :)
from a long time i want to buy a BTR-60 and to make with electricity engine but now this guys know what they are doing i really want to see the price for these upgrades
atvbtr.ru/catalog/Osnovnoj_razdel_73.html
Yea good luck zombies !
They are built to different roles. For example, a Stryker MGS can kill the BTR miles away.
Not if the BTR is carrying fagot, malyutka, Kornet or konkurs
rounds per minute?
Awesome.
You'd be safer inside than outside from shrapnel. Outside you'd have limbs blown off and your body ripped apart.