At some point (I think in the mid to early 90's) they included San Jose and San Francisco in the same metro and they added some other areas too because that area is relatively dense. I think they way they did the metro area is what is considered the CSA or urban area today. Anyways, the metro population because of the density should be like 8 million. Basically the Chicago of the west.
I agree it’s weird to not put them together. If you live in Menlo Park, you’re counted here as “San Francisco” even if you work in Palo Alto, which is counted here as “San Jose.” Oakland and SF and San Jose are too close together to separate them.
They have to be economically linked to be one metro area. For Example: The vast majority of residents in Tarrant County (Fort Worth) commute into Dallas County for work.
San Antonio metro should break the top 20 within the next decade. With adjacent metro Austin which is just minutes away the region should rank in the top 10 with 5 million people.
@@user-hi8iz to become one CSA as by the census, the commuter shares between metro areas need to be 15%. The suburban cities in between(New Braunfels and San Marcos as the anchors of Comal and Hays Counties) will determine that future which is is quickly growing. It's still.a long way from now. At least 20 years out.
Minutes away? Even without traffic that is a 45 mile drive (from Slaughter exit in South Austin to edge of San Antonio), and like 80 miles center to center. Factor in the legendary traffic in each city and well, I guess 11,692 minutes is still “just minutes.” But with Kyle, Buda, San Marcos, and New Braunfels in between and all growing, yeah one day we will see the “San Austin Metropolitan Sprawl.”
He used 2019 numbers and now in 2022 I'm pretty sure both San Antonio and Austin have grown significantly. Same for Houston and Dallas/FW although I am not sure those rankings would change any since they are already in the Top 5. But guessing San Antonio as already higher on the list.
I had no clue that 90% + of the U.S. largest cities has a major body of water (river, lake, ocean) in their city limits. Guess just never thought about it.
@@WashingtonSoldiers21 Even this day our inland waterways give us a huge advantage. We have the best setup in the world in this space and it is still orders of magnitude cheaper even with modern transport tech.
Imagine how cool it would have been to connect close metropolitan areas with high speed rail. I'd definitely buy a ticket if it weren't for cost overruns.
Brightline East in a nutshell. Soon Miami and Orlando will be connected by high-speed rail. With plans to proceed to Tampa. Connecting the 3 largest metropolitan areas of Florida with each other.
They’ve been talking about a maglev train from DC to Baltimore for years. Just issues with not wanting to destroy the environment. If they could figure out a way to not disrupt wildlife.. it would connect DC/Baltimore/Philly/NYC/Boston.
A lot of US cities have big metros but small populations, for example the twin cities and atlanta both have metros over 3 million but the actual city limits of atlanta, minneapolis, and st. paul only have 3-400,000
Minneapolis-St. Paul is also the same metro area. It’s surely no coincidence that the population number is exactly the same. Check San Fran and Oakland as well. And Dallas Fort Worth.
I'll give you credit for showing Washington, D.C.'s real downton skyline, instead of the Capitol building, Washington Monument etc. that every other image centers on.
Yes true. If DC had a skyline (closest thing is Rosslyn in No Va.) Notice tho that the mall and monuments, museums, Wash Monument are not there? Google Earth drives me crazy with this. There are many cities that for some reason, parts are darkened, or there’s no 3D view. I’d love to look on some of the big skyscraper cities like Shanghai in 3D but, sorry.
Always wondered why Raleigh-Durham was split (they are closer to each other than either of the 3 or 4 duplex metros mentioned) and the actual metro area is much higher on the list…
It's for racial reasons. Durham historically has been a black city for many years while Raleigh is a white city. This is why both have never been linked together.
@@doctorx1924 No, this is not why, while durham has always been more diverse, both cities are still white by majority. Durham, especially during the 80s and 90s, was seen as a lower class city than Raleigh, they are also incredibly culturally different and have some minor rivalries. It's not racially motivated, it just wouldnt make any sense, they are too different.
The only way they can be considered together is if over 40% of the population from each city commute from one to the other. So you need 40% of people living in Raleigh to work in Durham, and vice-versa. Doesn't matter how close they are
Cities like NYC and Atlanta have a lot in their CSA definition (it takes 3.5-4 hours to drive from one edge of the CSA to the other edge in both cities)
Did you know if Orlando and Tampa/St. Pete merged with each other and annexing Lakeland/Winter Haven (Polk County) you get 6.58 million people. Passing Miami and approaching Houston in the process.
Same as if you merged Metro Boston with metro Hartford and Providence you’d have 6.72 million…and they are all about the same distance away from each other as Tampa to Lakeland.
Interesting how you think some cities are much bigger than others, but a big chunk of them are relatively close. Population really starts jumping in the top 15.
Really stupid to do the "A" and "B". Just call it Dallas/Fort Worth or Tampa/St Pete. Several Metro Areas have more than one major city in them. What's even more ridiculous is you you did that with several cities, but not New York/Jersey City/Newark.
Riiiight. Because everybody sings about New York/Jersey City/Newark, New York/Jersey City/Newark, It's my kind of place. Make your own video, see if anybody watches it.
used to live in Chattanooga TN. went to Atlanta all the time. never really thought of it being that large of a city. if you're talking Metro area though it does make sense, you have like Marietta and stuff so makes sense I guess. just surprised me
Atlanta proper (city limits) is a little over 1 million people. The other 5+ million are in the suburbs which traditionally has always been part of the metro area. These rankings look similar to the CSA’s which is more accurate and encompassing of the real metro areas.
They did.It is part of the Raleigh metro. Each and every town is not listed in metro area. It is akin to having issue that, for example, San Jose is not listed as San Jose-Santa Clara-Mountain View-Palo Alto-Sunnyvale. It is just San Jose. Sorry Durham was not specifically called out. Silly North Carolinians!
@@timothynelson8330 The US gov't names them, not Tar Heels. Durham is not in the US designated Raleigh metro area, but it is in the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill COMBINED metro area. You can likely look these things up.
This confuses me San Francisco San Jose and Oakland are all part of one metro area THE RANK IS BACKWARDS oakland bigger than sfo and San Jose yet having a population of 435k compared to 822k in San Francisco and 1.1 million in San Jose
#12 was divided to give perspective. The SF metro area includes SF, Oakland, Berkeley, Hayward, over throughout San Mateo County and inland parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.
Largest metro areas in the US by difference: •Single state: Greater Los Angeles (Los Angeles and Orange Counties only) •Bi-state: Greater Boston (notice that 2 southeastern counties of New Hampshire are part of the metro area) •Tri-state: Metropolitan New York City (Southeastern New York State, Northern New Jersey and Pike County PA only) •Quad state: Delaware Valley/Metropolitan Philadelphia (only quad state area in the US) (note that DC's area isn't quad state, but a tri-state area and DC itself is a fedarate and city, not a state) •Single county: San Diego County, CA (Metropolitan San Diego) •Bi-county: Greater Los Angeles (Los Angeles and Orange Counties only) •Tri-county: Metropolitan Miami (Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties only) •With two core cities: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex •With three core cities: Hampton Roads (ft. Virginia Beach, Norfolk and Newport News) •With the most counties: Metropolitan Atlanta (29 counties in Georgia form that metro area) Note: All metro areas in the US are based on counties.
NYC metro covers much of CT too, so four states, not three. Chicago metro would be largest with three different states as result, NYC #1 for four. Metro Philly not only four state
NY Metro includes Connecticut way more than it does PA. To include Pennsylvania in NYC Metro you have to stretch your imagination. Where, and how, is anything in PA considered even remotely the suburbs of NYC? That part of PA is all mountains and it's 80 miles from the city.
@@hyzercreek, Connecticut have 3 counties and each have different metro areas and are part of the CSA of NYC. The most populous and closest county in CT near NYC is Fairfield County, CT. You know, where Bridgeport, Danbury, and their suburbs are located. Fairfield County, CT is what I call Metropolitan Bridgeport and Danbury.
@@rippasix210 Yes. If you consider what’s considered the greater Los Angles metropolitan area from Riverside to OC to Ventura, the population is over 18 million
Too bad they’re going to run out of water in 20 years. Climate change is going to raise Hell with the Sun Belt pretty soon. That’s the problem with overbuilding in desert areas. Large scale sprawl is unsustainable in the long term.
They did combine them lol. They just did it in a way to show both Minneapolis and St Paul skylines. Same with Tampa Bay/St Petersburg and San Francisco and Oakland.
This would be easier to just read on a list. There's no explanation or even any dialogue beyond the name of the city. Followed by a few seconds of needless music and erial footage of the area.
This is not accurate, because really what you’re looking at are urban areas. For instance, San Jose is clearly part of the combined urban area of San Francisco and Oakland. And Cleveland is actually part of a larger combined urban area with Akron. These are just two examples.
CSAs tell the real story and change many of these cities up. Also in CSAs they put places like San Francisco/San Jose/Oakland, Boston/Providence and DC/Baltimore together giving San Francisco and DC around 10 million each and Boston over 8 million. Also like others saying Tampa/Orlando and San Antonio/Austin should be together to me then Cincinnati/Dayton should combine and hell maybe even Louisville/Lexington.
DC and Baltimore have to totally different metro areas, DC Metro does not operate in Baltimore, The only way you can get to Bmore from DC is by car or Amtrak, two totally different cultures
Exactly. If you read "news", they make it sound like it's a ghost town. I think just some areas of it have lost population. If it had kept going from where it was in the 50's it would be comparable to Chicago by now though.
That is in due to the fact while the city of Detroit itself continues to lose population, the suburbs of Detroit are still increasing slightly in population.
I live in NYC now. It’s amazingly fun. It is also quite hard to live here and takes years to fully settle down with a job you like and a good apartment and social circle. It’s worth it if you can put up with that.
These numbers are not correct, sorry. For example, the population of San Francisco proper is about 875,000, not 4.5 million; that would be for the entire bays Area including San Jose, Oakland, etc. San Jose is larger than San Francisco or Oakland.
@@jpt7342 No they aren’t; the San Francisco numbers he quotes would have to include both Oakland and San Jose to get that number, and then he also lists Oakland and San Jose separately, with Oakland also having the wrong “metro” population number. The 1.99M number for San Jose is also a bit too high but at least it’s closer and not double-counting the whole Bay Area.
@@juangilberto1979 According to the Wikipedia page for metropolitan statistical areas, San Jose is counted separately from SF-Oakland. This is in accordance with the census bureau. The entire Bay Area is counted together for combined statistical areas and a total of 9.7 million.
Don’t know why they always count San Jose and San Francisco as two separate metro areas. It would be similar to Dallas and Fort Worth
Agreed
At some point (I think in the mid to early 90's) they included San Jose and San Francisco in the same metro and they added some other areas too because that area is relatively dense. I think they way they did the metro area is what is considered the CSA or urban area today. Anyways, the metro population because of the density should be like 8 million. Basically the Chicago of the west.
What about adding a Oakland with them?
I agree it’s weird to not put them together. If you live in Menlo Park, you’re counted here as “San Francisco” even if you work in Palo Alto, which is counted here as “San Jose.” Oakland and SF and San Jose are too close together to separate them.
They have to be economically linked to be one metro area. For Example: The vast majority of residents in Tarrant County (Fort Worth) commute into Dallas County for work.
You can tell the difference between the urban cities and the car cultured cities.
When NYC/Chi-Town have gigantic and vast skyscrapers but is listed next to LA and Dallas/Houston
San Antonio metro should break the top 20 within the next decade. With adjacent metro Austin which is just minutes away the region should rank in the top 10 with 5 million people.
exactly san antonio and austin are growing fast enough to maybe one day share a metro population
@@user-hi8iz to become one CSA as by the census, the commuter shares between metro areas need to be 15%. The suburban cities in between(New Braunfels and San Marcos as the anchors of Comal and Hays Counties) will determine that future which is is quickly growing. It's still.a long way from now. At least 20 years out.
Minutes away? Even without traffic that is a 45 mile drive (from Slaughter exit in South Austin to edge of San Antonio), and like 80 miles center to center.
Factor in the legendary traffic in each city and well, I guess 11,692 minutes is still “just minutes.”
But with Kyle, Buda, San Marcos, and New Braunfels in between and all growing, yeah one day we will see the “San Austin Metropolitan Sprawl.”
Agreed, if the two cities start to share infrastructure and business development they couple easily become the new DFW.
He used 2019 numbers and now in 2022 I'm pretty sure both San Antonio and Austin have grown significantly. Same for Houston and Dallas/FW although I am not sure those rankings would change any since they are already in the Top 5. But guessing San Antonio as already higher on the list.
I had no clue that 90% + of the U.S. largest cities has a major body of water (river, lake, ocean) in their city limits. Guess just never thought about it.
Because alot of us cities was built before cars so the trade by boat so the city had to be close to water
@@WashingtonSoldiers21 Even this day our inland waterways give us a huge advantage. We have the best setup in the world in this space and it is still orders of magnitude cheaper even with modern transport tech.
If im not mistaken Atlanta is the only city on this list not founded on a river or coast and even it has the Chattahoochee nearby
@@WashingtonSoldiers21 Exactly, almost every major city in the world was built near a waterway.
@Mean Gene
My understanding is that Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa’s largest city is the only major city not built near any water way.
thats so cool how dallas-fort worth is the next biggest metro area besides the big 3 (ny, la, chi)
Imagine how cool it would have been to connect close metropolitan areas with high speed rail. I'd definitely buy a ticket if it weren't for cost overruns.
No
Brightline East in a nutshell. Soon Miami and Orlando will be connected by high-speed rail. With plans to proceed to Tampa. Connecting the 3 largest metropolitan areas of Florida with each other.
We’re building it from Houston to Dallas.
@@breadoflifefaiupu8992 yes. We’re making America great unlike y’all whiners
They’ve been talking about a maglev train from DC to Baltimore for years. Just issues with not wanting to destroy the environment. If they could figure out a way to not disrupt wildlife.. it would connect DC/Baltimore/Philly/NYC/Boston.
As a Canadian who has been to the Twin Cities many times I'm impressed to know that they're the 16th largest cities in the United States!
A lot of US cities have big metros but small populations, for example the twin cities and atlanta both have metros over 3 million but the actual city limits of atlanta, minneapolis, and st. paul only have 3-400,000
Minneapolis-St. Paul is also the same metro area. It’s surely no coincidence that the population number is exactly the same. Check San Fran and Oakland as well. And Dallas Fort Worth.
No kidding
I'll give you credit for showing Washington, D.C.'s real downton skyline, instead of the Capitol building, Washington Monument etc. that every other image centers on.
Yes true. If DC had a skyline (closest thing is Rosslyn in No Va.) Notice tho that the mall and monuments, museums, Wash Monument are not there? Google Earth drives me crazy with this. There are many cities that for some reason, parts are darkened, or there’s no 3D view. I’d love to look on some of the big skyscraper cities like Shanghai in 3D but, sorry.
Excellent work!👍
Salt Lake CIty should include Ogden and Provo which both have 600,000 people also. They're so interconnected.
Awesome panorama pics!
How come you didn’t do 37a Norfolk 37b Virginia Beach?
Always wondered why Raleigh-Durham was split (they are closer to each other than either of the 3 or 4 duplex metros mentioned) and the actual metro area is much higher on the list…
It's for racial reasons. Durham historically has been a black city for many years while Raleigh is a white city. This is why both have never been linked together.
@@doctorx1924 No, this is not why, while durham has always been more diverse, both cities are still white by majority. Durham, especially during the 80s and 90s, was seen as a lower class city than Raleigh, they are also incredibly culturally different and have some minor rivalries. It's not racially motivated, it just wouldnt make any sense, they are too different.
Same thing with New Haven-Hartford-Springfield
The only way they can be considered together is if over 40% of the population from each city commute from one to the other. So you need 40% of people living in Raleigh to work in Durham, and vice-versa. Doesn't matter how close they are
If you count SF as SF, San Jose and the East Bay, it's around 8 million, making it about 4th or 5th,
Combined Statistical Areas are different than metropolitan areas according to the Census Bureau.
didn’t realise Dallas was that big
Same for Akron Cleveland. I wonder why Dylan DFW chose MSA's instead of CMA's. The result woud be much different for many cities.
People underestimate how big the cleveland akron canton area actually is
Cities like NYC and Atlanta have a lot in their CSA definition (it takes 3.5-4 hours to drive from one edge of the CSA to the other edge in both cities)
The day San Antonio and Austin connect is the day we officially overpopulated
this is how I determine how big a city is
Did you know if Orlando and Tampa/St. Pete merged with each other and annexing Lakeland/Winter Haven (Polk County) you get 6.58 million people. Passing Miami and approaching Houston in the process.
Same as if you merged Metro Boston with metro Hartford and Providence you’d have 6.72 million…and they are all about the same distance away from each other as Tampa to Lakeland.
Too far apart.....
Interesting how you think some cities are much bigger than others, but a big chunk of them are relatively close. Population really starts jumping in the top 15.
Really stupid to do the "A" and "B". Just call it Dallas/Fort Worth or Tampa/St Pete. Several Metro Areas have more than one major city in them.
What's even more ridiculous is you you did that with several cities, but not New York/Jersey City/Newark.
Riiiight. Because everybody sings about New York/Jersey City/Newark, New York/Jersey City/Newark, It's my kind of place. Make your own video, see if anybody watches it.
Then again, we would have an NYC/NJ (Top 1), Bay Area (Top 5), DMV (Top 10), Tampa/StPete (Top 25)?
@@hermes-stanlvu4116 The compiler wanted to show Fort Worth and St Pete skylines. And Oakland. Quite an offensive decision, apparently. 😁
@@johnyoung1761 ehh, those areas are seen more as “twin cities” and Jersey City was partially shown in the NYC clip anyway
@@tomgeraci9886 I think that's my point, To Geraci. World is full of complainers and I'm gonna complain about that.
I'm guessing the Huntsville, AL MSA has displaced B'ham as of the 2020 census....
Let’s gooo Dallas!
used to live in Chattanooga TN. went to Atlanta all the time. never really thought of it being that large of a city. if you're talking Metro area though it does make sense, you have like Marietta and stuff so makes sense I guess. just surprised me
Hey man
Atlanta proper (city limits) is a little over 1 million people. The other 5+ million are in the suburbs which traditionally has always been part of the metro area. These rankings look similar to the CSA’s which is more accurate and encompassing of the real metro areas.
Why didn’t you do Durham as a part b with Raleigh?
It isn't included in the Raleigh Metro Area
They did.It is part of the Raleigh metro. Each and every town is not listed in metro area. It is akin to having issue that, for example, San Jose is not listed as San Jose-Santa Clara-Mountain View-Palo Alto-Sunnyvale. It is just San Jose. Sorry Durham was not specifically called out. Silly North Carolinians!
@@timothynelson8330 The US gov't names them, not Tar Heels. Durham is not in the US designated Raleigh metro area, but it is in the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill COMBINED metro area. You can likely look these things up.
I am surprised no city in NJ was on this list
Oh that’s easy. It’s because all NJ cities are a part of larger metro areas in neighboring states. Philadelphia and NYC generally dominate this.
Did you delete your other one? It had so many views.
Those highways in Dallas look horrific!
Why? Lol
If they listed Tombstone Arizona and included LA and NYC and everything in between it would have 340,000,000 in the Tombstone metro area.
Been to 34 of the 50....not too bad. Even my home city made the top 5
mbn compared my to life in OKC, 3 hours away from the DFW
44 of the 50 here.....I travel too much.
This confuses me San Francisco San Jose and Oakland are all part of one metro area THE RANK IS BACKWARDS oakland bigger than sfo and San Jose yet having a population of 435k compared to 822k in San Francisco and 1.1 million in San Jose
it’s metro area so not those numbers but the metro area should be that whole area, also san jose is just 1 mil and barely growing
#12 was divided to give perspective. The SF metro area includes SF, Oakland, Berkeley, Hayward, over throughout San Mateo County and inland parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.
Oaklands not bigger than San Jose.,....
Is Ft Lauderdale included in Miami??
I can't believe Nashville. I've lived 15 minutes from there 4 years and 20 years 45 minutes away. I hate/love it.
Largest metro areas in the US by difference:
•Single state: Greater Los Angeles (Los Angeles and Orange Counties only)
•Bi-state: Greater Boston (notice that 2 southeastern counties of New Hampshire are part of the metro area)
•Tri-state: Metropolitan New York City (Southeastern New York State, Northern New Jersey and Pike County PA only)
•Quad state: Delaware Valley/Metropolitan Philadelphia (only quad state area in the US) (note that DC's area isn't quad state, but a tri-state area and DC itself is a fedarate and city, not a state)
•Single county: San Diego County, CA (Metropolitan San Diego)
•Bi-county: Greater Los Angeles (Los Angeles and Orange Counties only)
•Tri-county: Metropolitan Miami (Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties only)
•With two core cities: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
•With three core cities: Hampton Roads (ft. Virginia Beach, Norfolk and Newport News)
•With the most counties: Metropolitan Atlanta (29 counties in Georgia form that metro area)
Note: All metro areas in the US are based on counties.
NYC metro covers much of CT too, so four states, not three. Chicago metro would be largest with three different states as result, NYC #1 for four. Metro Philly not only four state
NY Metro includes Connecticut way more than it does PA. To include Pennsylvania in NYC Metro you have to stretch your imagination. Where, and how, is anything in PA considered even remotely the suburbs of NYC? That part of PA is all mountains and it's 80 miles from the city.
I'm talking about metropolitan statistical areas, not combined statistical areas.
@@hyzercreek, Connecticut have 3 counties and each have different metro areas and are part of the CSA of NYC. The most populous and closest county in CT near NYC is Fairfield County, CT. You know, where Bridgeport, Danbury, and their suburbs are located. Fairfield County, CT is what I call Metropolitan Bridgeport and Danbury.
@@CrystalClearWith8BE Bridgeport is too small and Danbury is WAY too small to be metropolitan cities of their own. They are suburbs of NYC.
I live in Oakland! I love it!
Said no one ever
I’m from Oakland. It has gone downhill so much I didn’t recognize it when I went back. The political « leadership » there is absolutely terrible.
Seems like Riverside is the largest metro area not to have a pro sports team.
because its really an extension of the LA metro. 5 millon folks didnt move to the IE because of
Riverside
@@rippasix210
Yes. If you consider what’s considered the greater Los Angles metropolitan area from Riverside to OC to Ventura, the population is over 18 million
Riverside is the bedroom of the Los Angeles area.
I like the music
Really???
Good Job.
Phoenix is gonna be in the top 5 very soon too many people moving here from other states there's a lot of construction.
Yes, as long as there is air conditioning and the water supply holds out!
Too bad they’re going to run out of water in 20 years. Climate change is going to raise Hell with the Sun Belt pretty soon. That’s the problem with overbuilding in desert areas. Large scale sprawl is unsustainable in the long term.
I would combine Minneapolis with St.Paul because they are so close to each other
They did combine them lol. They just did it in a way to show both Minneapolis and St Paul skylines. Same with Tampa Bay/St Petersburg and San Francisco and Oakland.
Minneapolis/St Paul and Dallas/ Fort Worth should have been rolled into single cities. They are both single metropolitan areas.
They WERE combined (notice the populations were identical for the A and the B). The video just chose to give them two representatives.
It's literally called the DFW metropolex
They are very close to each other…
Los Angeles ❤
This would be easier to just read on a list. There's no explanation or even any dialogue beyond the name of the city. Followed by a few seconds of needless music and erial footage of the area.
St. Louis My hometown
Bro same
Used to live across the river in Belleville. I loved going to St. Louis!
My hometown is Los Angeles
Nice place to be from.
Raleigh and Durham need to be an A and B pair.
of course my city is 51 and didnt make it on the list
What city?
@@orereo2328
Boogerville indiana
You missed Tucson.
Name of catchy tune please? Never mind I found it. 🥰🥰🥰
This is not accurate, because really what you’re looking at are urban areas. For instance, San Jose is clearly part of the combined urban area of San Francisco and Oakland. And Cleveland is actually part of a larger combined urban area with Akron. These are just two examples.
If you combine SF, Oakland and SJ you get a huge metro area.
i think anything near the sf bay should count
@@snuuzii4614 yep
God freeways are so ugly
I loved this video.
They got Jacksonville wrong their not counting its 7 counties includst Augustine Jacksonville largest city in USA
How come the entire new York state has a population of 19 millions and you reporting it's only the city with that population 🤔
Atlanta
Aye ATL!!! ✊🏽
Dallas ft worth are DFW, why do separate? Is that your home town?
Bruh he put it in the same metro area, it’s just that he put the two in separate places (4a, 4b) to show the skylines of both cities
other possible titles for this video; 50 places to avoid, 50 places with high crime, 50 places i would nuke if i had 50 nukes.
CSAs tell the real story and change many of these cities up. Also in CSAs they put places like San Francisco/San Jose/Oakland, Boston/Providence and DC/Baltimore together giving San Francisco and DC around 10 million each and Boston over 8 million. Also like others saying Tampa/Orlando and San Antonio/Austin should be together to me then Cincinnati/Dayton should combine and hell maybe even Louisville/Lexington.
DC and Baltimore have to totally different metro areas, DC Metro does not operate in Baltimore, The only way you can get to Bmore from DC is by car or Amtrak, two totally different cultures
It's nice to live in a state that has less people than Detroit, wide open spaces
Tampa/ST Petersburg the same metro area
thats why its 18a and 18b
@@dyltack5349 I get it.i noticed you did the same for Dallas/fort worth
It’s odd that you call Dallas and Fort Worth bigger than Texas largest city Houston. It’s been the top 3 or 4 in our nation every since I remember…???
Houston the city has a higher population than Dallas or Fort Worth individually, but the DFW metroplex has more people than Houston.
@@breensprout Yes I know, but calling one or another larger is just crazy.
Because is larger, is a metro area, Houston’s metro area is not larger than DFW…
@@breensprout exactly!!!!!
I don't understand 4a and 4b on dallas and Fort worth
Didn't know the disowned Detroit has more people than the bottom 36 metro areas
Exactly. If you read "news", they make it sound like it's a ghost town. I think just some areas of it have lost population. If it had kept going from where it was in the 50's it would be comparable to Chicago by now though.
That is in due to the fact while the city of Detroit itself continues to lose population, the suburbs of Detroit are still increasing slightly in population.
It is actually known as the Detroit-Warren-Livonia statistical area.
@@jamesstein6727
The what area? It’s just metro Detroit... goes way beyond Livonia or warren.
Interesting
Jacksonville I’m cool with being the small big city
This survey is way off, maybe in the 1970s census reports.
i wanna be a part of it.......new york, new york
Don't believe the hype.
I live in NYC now. It’s amazingly fun. It is also quite hard to live here and takes years to fully settle down with a job you like and a good apartment and social circle. It’s worth it if you can put up with that.
These numbers are not correct, sorry. For example, the population of San Francisco proper is about 875,000, not 4.5 million; that would be for the entire bays Area including San Jose, Oakland, etc. San Jose is larger than San Francisco or Oakland.
The numbers are correct, sorry you don’t know how to read the description.
@@jpt7342 No they aren’t; the San Francisco numbers he quotes would have to include both Oakland and San Jose to get that number, and then he also lists Oakland and San Jose separately, with Oakland also having the wrong “metro” population number. The 1.99M number for San Jose is also a bit too high but at least it’s closer and not double-counting the whole Bay Area.
@@jalanbuck oakland is still part of sf in this metro. He just put it as a and b because it was to showcase both skylines
Good
I ❤️ new York,
Cincinnati/Dayton metro…3 million
This list has 54 cities- not 50. Faulty title.
How about tulsa
Not enough population to make top 50.
What about Tulsa? No one cares about Tulsa. That's why not enough people care to live there and it didn't make the list. TULSA
Does a bullet point list need to be a video?
Who would comment on a bullet list?
@@johnyoung1761Good point. Our conversation has produced more content than this video.
Tell us these cities area
Norfick?
I’ve lived here for 31 years, it’s either Norfick or Norfuck or Nawfuck.
If anyone says Norfoke, you know they’re not local.
Only two things come out of Oklahoma.
What? 🤔
This isn't metro areas, this is cities, there's a difference. Metro areas include all suburbs.
This is metro areas for example Houston has a population of 2.4 million but add all the suburbs and it’s 7 million
Don't be a dumb dumb. 🙄
I LOVE MY MIAMI GO MIAMI
yeah i guess im sad but oh well we need more cubans to come
@RENZO PEREZ okay cool
@RENZO PEREZ yeah ik but i really want miami to be first but there are not only cubans here
Miami has recently added a tech scene. Quite a few tech companies are relocating from SF & Silicon valley.
Well I be Damn my city (Richmond) is in the top 50
New York city makes every other place look like a country town!🤪😜
Dallas ❤️
You Américans can see China metro areas in you tube
Kauheeta
CT has two on the list - Hartford and NYC.
Yes Fairfield county CT is part of the New York City metropolitan area.
@@joez3706
That’s not fair... I demand a recount ☝🏻
I am GLAD that I don't live in ANY OF THESE people zoos
4:31 and 4:39 where my twin cities peeps at 🙄💅👑
Right here!
HOUSTON!!
pensei que as de minessota fossem uma so
I’d count the Bay Area as one metro area
NYC is fk huge. my city.
san jose all day
All of them looks the same
It is cgi, not actual pictures.
IE represent :D
texas bem ny tem 2 skylines em 1 so ilha
?
texas se saiu bem
Cool but not entirely accurate
It’s literally from the census bureau, how is it not accurate?
@@jpt7342 35, 12a and 12b should be all together and the population should be closer 7.5 rather than 6.7
@@juangilberto1979 According to the Wikipedia page for metropolitan statistical areas, San Jose is counted separately from SF-Oakland.
This is in accordance with the census bureau.
The entire Bay Area is counted together for combined statistical areas and a total of 9.7 million.
1 london
?
1 Tokyo
das menores so pittsburg causa impacto
👑🐎 liberty 🗽🗽 colombus inca empire 👑🐎 Roman catholic 👑🐎🚓🚨