Then one day the owner of ODM retired and the company was sold to an investment consortium that determined profits could be significantly increased by relocating manufacturing to China ...
@@jerkjerkington3874 It was Reagan deregulation crusade, that destroyed all anti trust law protections, leading to the increased monopolization of everything you see around you.
@@screamingphoenix8113 So by "unregulated" you mean "slightly less regulated than it used to be." And of course that's ignoring the fact that stock exchanges like NYSE and NASDAQ are granted government sanctioned monopolies over the stock market by virtue of the fact that nobody else could possibly meet the government's standards for licensing, or the fact that limited liability corporations themselves a form of undeserved legal immunity granted by the government. Essentially, what happens is that the government manipulates the market until its cronies can form a monopoly, and then every once in a while it makes a big show of taking some particularly unpopular monopoly down a peg while all the cronies slip out the back door and move on to the next scam. And then it all gets blamed on the free market, because clearly the problem was that peons like us have too much freedom. Obviously government manipulation was never the problem, right?
It is never too late to get started. It really isn’t. You’ll be kicking back and happy you went through the first few steps in a short few months. Once you have a base, of course, it’s great to keep learning. But it only gets easier :(
Started at 25 now I’m 30 I saved and invested all my money for 5 years besides bills and have no fun in life and still don’t have 100K. IDK how you people do it I’m about to give up and actually enjoy my life.
I believe it’s called (trading) when speculation is involved not gambling Real investing are owning true shares of stock on real businesses with great cashflows with real products and services Investing is such a beautiful thing when studied truly on the concept. Too much corruption confuses the average investor that’s the sad part
Keep in mind that in general the government was more compitent back then as well, or at least The challenges and pitfalls that it faced it was better equipped to deal with than those it faces currently.
@@MishaFlower Bro last time I checked America never had it's own version of Tianamen Square. While yes it is true corruption and greed has had it's influence within America's government since it's inception... We don't outright butcher people for their interests. At least, we didn't use to. Nowadays it does seem like a definite possibility, given how one sided the government is now. Edit: Guess I was wrong, this was an actual thing. (And apparently this isn't important enough to teach in most history classes.)
Ahhh, yes. The days when every company was expected to make a profit and distribute a portion of that said profit in the form of a dividend. Simpler times.
I miss when dividend stocks were common. Felt like you actually got something from the company growing instead of just playing a zero sum game against your fellow investors, so some rich CEO can sell his private shares when they want a new yacht.
You’re right, zombie companies shouldn’t be allowed. Borrowing money has been too easy the last few decades from banking deregulation. We don’t really have capitalism anymore if losers can keep their doors open.
This is just the system advancing. You’d be an utter fool to believe that these assholes‘ ultimate goal was to pay any kind of if not an ever increasing dividend to you for our money
Dividends are the kiss of death and guarantee the stock will never go anywhere.... You want to invest in businesses that put those profits back into the business for future growth
@@toomanydiscs1056 yeah ofc, you want to "invest" in stocks that are guaranteed to never bring you any fucking return unless some other asshole is willing to pay you more than you paid. genius.
I've just begun learning about value investing, and I've found that many good stocks are undervalued despite their intrinsic value. If you had quarter of a million to create a strong portfolio, which stock would you choose for better returns?
I believe a solid portfolio should include three key components: ETFs for diversification, dividend stocks for steady cash flow, and top tech stocks. Given your budget, it’s a smart move to consult a fiduciary advisor for professional guidance.
I agree with you. As an early investor in NVDA, AVGO, ANSS, and PLTR, my financial advisor's advice was incredibly helpful. Over the past 7 years, she has helped me find stocks that did 10x multiple times. With her help, I've grown my portfolio to over a million dollars.
I'm trying to find a certified one to boost my investments/portfolio, but it's tough online. Can I get a ref from you, since you know about this stuff?
She goes by ‘’DIANA CASTEEL LYNCH a renowned figure in the financial industry with years decades of experience. I'd suggest you research her further on the web.
Glad to have stumbled upon this, curiously inputted her on the web, easily spotted her consulting page and was able to schedule a call session. Ive seen commentary about advisers but not this phenomenal
When I was at school at lunch break there was some sort of public class where you could just walk in and learn stuff for an hour while you eat, I'd have much rather learn all about how our finances worked and stuff like that instead of dead monarchs and why they have slanted faces
Some of the non-tech that I think are positioned to go really up are Home Depot, Delta Airlines, Pool Corp, etc. I have set aside almost $200k for that. I want to know if my projections are right based on technical observations. Any suggestions?
Would recommend a banking company like JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, or WellsFargo. Having a diverse portfolio is key; that being said, Intel and AMD are great stocks to keep an eye on.
As a former broker and current advisor, I can confirm this is accurate, although extremely simplified. There are a LOT more steps involved, and many more facets of the industry. Some key things to point out are that not all common stock issues dividends. Growth stocks reinvest those dividends in an attempt to further grow the company. Large cap stocks are more likely to issue dividends than small or mid cap stocks. Also, they neglected to mention how the exchange makes money on an agency transaction, like the one described for the round lot of ODM. Since the transaction was made on an agency basis between two brokers, a markup was not charged, but rather a sales commission would be. Only in a principle transaction where the broker/market maker owns the stock will a markup (spread) be charged. If a company is going to issue new stock, the board of directors needs to vote on it, and a new filing needs to be made with the SEC. The initial offering made by ODM was described as either a pink sheet (OTC) listing or a private placement. If the former, the secondary offering would not be subject to the same scrutiny and regulatory requirements as the primary offering. No new prospectus would need to be issued to new buyers, for example. In a private placement, the secondary offering would be the company’s IPO.
I think most people are willing to go through another Great Depression in order to cut off China and give our kids a better chance without needing a college degree
@@zacharymogel9500 the difference then and now is then the stockbrokers committed suicide and the market got oversight when now our government bailed all of the companies out and left everyone else to dry.
Hopefully, people know that this video is about a process that no longer exists and no longer takes place. The video only approximates the theory that was in place in the 1980s and earlier, and actually was more complex. Now, the process for most corporate participants (in particular the financing of public corporations) entails other aspects of finance not mentioned here. All of modern stock listings in the U.S. are digitally transacted, contrary to the methods promoted in the video. However, the process of corporate fundraising has changed radically over the last 20-30 years - quite contrary to the presentation in this video (which was probably made in the 1950s or 1960s). The process for trading stocks was not created for common “investors” to transact in, but was modified and redesigned exclusively for the professional trader. You should buy a book on the mechanics of markets before you invest, just so you have a perfunctory understanding of how things work. Otherwise, this video is very misleading for prospective, inexperienced investors.
Dude, you fucking NAILED IT!!! I teach to the new investor and have echoed EXACTLY WHAT YOU'VE STATED. Godbless you, continue to spread the word. I like the video, but it is NOT ACCURATELY REFLECTING THE FINANCIAL MARKETS OF THIS PERIOD...
Anyone with half of a brain should know this is an old 60's film to interest the average Joe to want to invest. But people don't have common sense anymore. They've never seen Gun Smoke, I dream of Jeanie or others like it. You made a very accurate statement and I agree. However, the video did say at the end to get more detailed information before investing. But sometimes with beginners, since things are so complex now, it's good to get back to the basics. True we don't have ticker tapes anymore and much of the Wall ST mania is handled electronically but the same theory and mechanics of it all continue to work the similarly. The problem is that today, people are more dishonest than they were 100 years ago (not to say they weren't dishonest) and with the expedience of media and internet, news flows much more quickly and people don't take the time to do their research (or due diligence as so commonly referred to) and jump right in and end up losing and wondering why. True fact: Everyone WILL lose money in the stock market! Never the less, great statement and I say take the video for face value and not over analyze it. Maybe if everyone could get back to basics the world wouldn't be so difficult.
Yeah. I'm no expert, but this cartoon obviously portrays the theory of the benefits of investing. No corruption in this ideal cartoon and everything is nice...but what about 1929 or the crashes in the 70s with little gas or the 80s when local businesses got screwed? I'm probably repeating some others but it's clear this isn't perfect.
Before diving in into stock market, study and understand the market with a trading simulator before diving in with real cash. it's really helpful. However, my portfolio has been stalling this year. I have approximately $150k stagnant in my reserve that needs growth, any suggestions to grow my portfolio will be highly appreciated.
The market is volatile at this time. I will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
Very true , I diversified my $400K portfolio across multiple market with the aid of an investment advisor, I have been able to generate over $900k in net profit across high dividend yield stocks, ETF and bonds in few months.
Thanks for sharing, I just looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an e-mail shortly.
I can’t fathom how that would even work today with fraud so rampant. They could make buy and sell orders with no I.D except claiming to be somebody on the phone. They had a higher trust society back then.
The real secret of building wealth is by having multiple streams of income, that's includes both online and offline investments. If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep,you are fated to die working.
Great content ,The Stock market is still a fantastic tool for building wealth , however, so it's wise to consider investing even if you don't have much money to spare.
depend on the type of share either common or preferred share; preferred stock are paid a specific amount agreed at the moment it was bought it will never be less or more if you stock is for 10$ that's what you will get. On the other hand common stock are more like been part of the company between you and the other owners it is decided how the dividends will be used, in other word common stock varys. Sometime for the sake of the company it might be decided to use it to invest on improving the company, other times the company has made so little profit that after paying all its necessity their is no or very little money to be able to pay you or the others; other time the company might have as example 200 millions on dividends and you own 25% of the stock and 100% of the dividend will be split between investors; so you have earned 50 millions in a shot! and suddenly next time their is a crisis and the company has 500 dollars dividend and you get 125$ (if they even choose to split that); so as you see their is benefit and risks one will provide a solid secure amount the other will be more risky but might give you 1000% or more profit all the sudden.
Blazerelf Thank you for that, great and enlightening answer!! If you don't mind, here's a few more: How do you affect how a company makes more money as an investor? I can understand an expert going in, buying 30% shares, turning his "trick", the company runs better and they make more money - if that is even legal. But how about stock traders? Those who don't know anything about what the company does - How do they make money on stocks? Is that a misconception? I mean, in order to buy stocks at the right moment, you must know something about the business' logistics, right? You can't just look at the profit graph all day through, to me that just seems like gambling! Also, why do the leader board of a company choose to pay out dividends to stock owners, and just not take everything for themselves? What good do small time stock owners do for a company? If I own 1 stock at 10$ in a 1 million stock company, why would they even bother paying out? Do the amount they pay have to be split evenly to all stock holders? I highly appreciate your time.
yeah is definitely legal warren buffet is rich because of this, he invest in other companys and sell share for more or get alot of money from them; he is pretty elder he bought decades ago shares of company like Coca-cola, Gaico, banks and other known business when they were kind of small and look how big they are now so he got big too; but he has also lost loook for example Lehman brothers that went bankrupt he had share their and that was a lost, their is nothing wrong with that you have to have a good eye and the video said it, the company swears their financial info is true, the investors look at that info to determine if your company is worth spending their money on. Nothing illegal on that. Stockholders make money by commission; my teacher use to tell me investor are like grand leagues because you must have a lot of money to be at that level but that doesn't mean you are a pro at investing in shares; stockholder is that person you hire to advice you in how to do so he is like a lawyer that know more about the system and tells you whats is best for your money andafter a decision is taken he is also who makes the investment or purchase; some people trust their stock holder enough to allow them to invest their money without even asking them; their commission depend a lot of how big is the investment and the results from it. Prevously you said they dont known nothing about the company, definetly they dont and they dont need to, they need is numbers; the financial informarmation is not a day to day graph is a annual or semestral information; you can follow the tendencies of a company also their is different type of tables and graphs to determine different info; it is not as simple as you might think where ag uy looks at a graph and sees the company made alot of money this year and you conclude is good. Let me give a simple example: you are a stock holder and your client wishes to invest in common stocks and the company shows that after he pays all its bills and accounts it has 500 millions which sound like alot, but common invertor gets paid last so you still need to see how much the preffered get, boom! it shows they get a unchangable mandatory amount of 300 million in total so now their is remaining 200 mill for all the coomon inv, still you have to know how many are they and what % in the share you would posses? let says he was interest on a 20% that means he can profit 40 mil which is great still. But as a professional you find a problem an account showing the company borrowed 200 millions, based on that you can conclude the company would have not make profit for the common investor if not becasue of the borrowing, you look back and see how many time the company has borrowed money and deduce how much does the company depend on debts, their is also something called financial indicators which are equations you can use to calculate diffent factor 9of a company as how indebted how much profit is really from sells, how much % in averageinvestor make. So as you see their is a lot of tools a stock broker or anybody can use to determine their risk, mathematics, number don't lie you just need to be well educated. Stills as you said the investor is gambling because nobody can predict perfectly when will that company fall; apple coulod fall tomorow and the numbers did not say so, another global financial crisis mayt happen tomorow you never know; but the numbers can help you reduce the falure probabilitys
123TauruZ321 you last questions said ¿why do the leader board of a company choose to pay out dividends to stock owners, and just not take everything for themselves? I believe you refer to why the leaders pay share owners, the reason is because the leaders ARE THE SHARE OWNERS if you bough common share you are one of those guys sitting their taking decision on how will you all be paid (unless you have preffered share in that case you must always get paid as established and not paying them would be as not paying an employer, which is illegal), depending in how much shares you got it determines how much your vote weights in the board of directors; sometimes they choose to not pay the full amount the company has made in dividends becasue they feel investing it on improving the company or as a saving is better; its like in the government where their is an assembly, suggestion are given for new laws or decision and votes are counted for a resolution What good do small time stock owners do for a company? If I own 1 stock at 10$ in a 1 million stock company, why would they even bother paying out? Do the amount they pay have to be split evenly to all stock holders? JAJA i remember I asked this to my teacher, as I said before he wold me investors like "major leagues" people who can afford huge investment, almost nobody buys 1 share. Anyways Lets say someone did, yes they would have to pay me my % anyways although it is extremely small lol; but it is a bad idea because buying that share costed me money since you had to pay commission to the stock holder and it is usually about 40$ or less per transaction also the amount you might get from dividend might be too small example 100,000 share you buy one and the company is splitting 5million you have earned 50$, minus any fees, taxes or whatever you will be charged, notice your profit is way lower than all the money you made on that small share, he i have link with more details www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/143.asp
Thank you so much man, highly appreciated! It is a very interesting "game", or line of work. Could listen to it for hours. I am at a crossroads in life now, where I am trying to choose a new education, at age 30. Thinking of taking a degree in economics and marketing, just to see what sticks or not. I need big responsibility in order to get out of bed. Been working in the building industry most of my adult life and I know 100%, you don't ever have a chance at getting rich from that ^^ But in the world of paper and stocks, you do have a chance. I work hard, am very honest and have good ethics. I am also good at spotting liars and keeping them at bay. I want to give it a shot. What do you think? Thank you again!! :-) :-) Great link too!
Actually his job used to be pretty risky. You have to identify which stocks will yield the highest earnings. Also make sure you don't lose your clients' money. This job required a lot of skill, intuition, and research.
@@Galdenberry_Lamphuck 1. coal miners have a certain guaranteed income, brokers do not. 2. Skilled vs unskilled labor. Anyone can be a coal miner, but not anyone can be a broker. Therefore, it makes sense skilled laborers get paid more.
@@Sonyim414 It used to be a high-risk-high-reward job wjere you needed to be smart to succeed, now it's too often about market manipulation and scamming suckers out of their money.
They did until OBM realized they could have higher profit margins and larger dividends if they moved their operations overseas. So the shareholders ousted the founder of the company and the board moved the operation to China.
I would expect to find at this point, at least three to five specific tracks of deviation emanating from each particular partition of investments in all realms. Particularly, the investment banking political interface mode. The pharmaceutical industries interface nexus with the regulatory bodies and the CIA and also the nexus between all media and all elecitve bodies.. That means at the initial point of primary level inferface. That projects into at least 40 potential pathways in wihch various derivitive types of corruption can be currently generating... The major types of corruption are, hierachical, policy based, direct proffitting. Endanger the public prolfit and political leverage.... It almost requires a specific set of exppertise in order for one to be abke to authentically confront this octapus... But the task must be done, for to not do so will create a wide spread breakdown on multiple levels for the entire civilzation... Thats not hyperbolic, thats actual..
Old Skool! Great, classic animation and very informative. This seems quite old, although I am guessing this is the same way things are happening - just faster and on a bigger scale. Thanks.
I came for the stock market education and I left with the existential dread of just how ravenous capitalistic consumerism can get when left unchecked. 10/10
I also have a question. Initially if a company enters the stock exchange to due the need of money, why does it still stay on the stock market when it is financial sounds and is prosperous?
financially sound its not because of profit it's because of public money but as you said company even can buy it's own stocks from stock market whenever it wants even it can delisted from stock exchange if it holds 90 % of its own stock ;)
simple, because the industry is always growing. you saw how the small business went from making a few drums to making dozens of drums, but soon more customers demanded more business so he expanded again. this keeps happening as the industries keep growing and growing, and new and better services are made. so they still need more capital from stock sales to fund it
The owners of the shares can then sell them to others at any time, as happened in the cartoon. To leave the stock market would require a buyback of those stocks freely traded by the stockholders every day.
@@fatpotatoe6039 not to mention, when a corporation gets large enough it isn't just one person at the top calling the shots, there's a board of directors they have to answer to, and they all have a stake in the company as well. it's far harder for one person to make major changes that way, so the company is more stable
Indeed, after a certain number of dividends, the stock/share should be closed as paid out with profit and thereafter the company should issue new shares. Leave the workers and their salaries alone.
This did answer one thing I have wondered about for ages. I never knew simply owning the stock gave dividends. What little i heard always made it sound like the only way to make money in stocks was to sell them for more then you bought them for. If my dearly departed grandfather is to be believed he sold the founder of PepsiCo some of his first soda fountains. He didn't have enough money to pay him there but offered him a 10% share of the company. But dear old grandpa just said he could pay him later, which he did. But now seeing this I know the dividends from PepsiCo stocks would have made my family rich enough that i and my brothers would have never needed to work.
Damnnnn, there are no better simple explanation than this one, I've got the overview, now I could read some books about basic stock/cryptocurrency investment without being totally blind. Thank you so muchhh!!!!
It grinds my gears seeing that analogy they use for college. Objects on a conveyor belt line. Treating students like objects which do not think for themselves. They go to college without asking why. And leave thinking they’re doing the right thing. They thought they knew what they were doing, but they didn’t.
Except it has nothing to do with quality of product. These days, it’s more common to have a crappy product or service and have the CEO and board make $50,000,000 apiece while the customer suffers, then the board cashes out when they go out of business.
Man, they used to explain stuff so much better. I’ve watched numerous modern TH-cam on how stocks work and this explained it best. I also like the old black and white videos explaining horsepower, transmissions, stuff like that
Well, that's probably because it's a lot more complicated than this video now. Thats like watching a video about an ancient single celled organism and being like "well gee, I've been studying this whole big human physiology textbook for a year. What a waste of time that was! Should have just watched the 5 minutes prokaryote video and then applied for med school"
Then next day, a SHF decided that they should short ODM, 200%+ shorted. Cut to next scene where fisherman is able to sell easily, but cowboy can't buy because the BUY button was turned off.
As long as you check a companies financial statements and price to earnings ratio, you will run lower risk. I created my portfolio about 3 weeks ago with a quarter in British equity, yet Brexit hasn't had a catastrophic impact on my portfolio. It fell by 6% in two days because I had municipal bonds to cancel out losses, however it has almost recovered back to breakeven at only -1%. It has recovered in just 2 or 3 days. Stocks are grand if you are careful.
A door True, but I don't feel that just having cheaper prices is enough, as there are several factors that bring that price back up from import tax to a higher min wage for the employees at distribution level. The only marginally cheaper price doesn't make up for the fact that the jobs most readily available still don't make enough to buy the marginally cheaper products. See company's don't lose money if they can help it, they'll just raise their profit margin if thye know peps will buy the thing.
Where's the part when vulture capital interests buys the company, forces the company to take on a massive amount of extra debt, and then the company goes bankrupt and it's assorted pieces are sold off?
You’re thinking about it from the nowaday progressive. However, from the classical liberal, this meant jobs taking care of families, new inventions to make life easier, useful products that improve our quality of life. It’s about weighing the costs and benefits, and we should do something that provides the most benefit to society. Traditionally, we have said that improving our quality of life, making useful inventions, and providing jobs to provide for families is greater weight than smoke stacks belching fire and brimstone into the air. The nowaday progressive equate that with the world ending, though, so of course if something literally ends the world, it is heavier weight than increasing our quality of life, jobs taking care of families, and so on and so forth. If the word is literally ending, that’s the heaviest thing. The question becomes to what extent is having this factory damaging the earth, and what is the likelihood that those impacts will be severe/extreme/or world ending? Is the chance for the world to have a higher temperature or is the world as a matter of fact, literally coming from an end? What is the likelihood of that? Which is more significant, the improvements of quality of life that we all enjoy, the products that we all enjoy, the technology that makes us incredibly in tune with society all together at once, the jobs providing for billions of families or the likelihood that the harm will be great (world ending ). This is the question we have to weigh. I don’t think we should be ignoring the earth and her environment, since God has called us to be good stewards of this earth and the wonderful nature that is given to us. We should conserve it, I am an Eagle Scout, and I love nature. I’ve raised horses all my life and enjoy fishing and growing wheat. We can certainly be concerned with environment. But we should absolutely not get rid of the great things that these smoke stacks give us. A better way of life, and easier way to live, jobs and provision for our loved ones. These are all incredible things. I enjoy eating cereal, it’s my favorite breakfast. However did you know the cereal that was grown with wheat was made with nitrogen implants into the soil so that we could have an efficient crop yield? That nitrogen was produced for the entire country in nitrogen plants, such as the one outside my hometown. The nitrogen plant, called the Koch plant, provides 10% of all the nitrogen in the USA. And it provides HUNDREDS of jobs for families in my community. The Koch plant is involved throughout our community as well, sponsoring events, and giving back to the community in ways that make me enjoy having them in our lives. They provide meaningful support to local youth sports teams, a foundation to build a community around, and tons of nitrogen so you and I can enjoy cereal for breakfast everyday. To say that the Koch plant is evil, or harming society is incredibly wrong. They provide meaningful interactions and support for thousands, even millions through their nitrogen. To say that they should be discontinued is wrong and incorrect. What about the people it would affect? This is also not a conjectural harm, a “it might maybe happen, but we don’t know how bad” harm, like the world ending - this is a guaranteed harm. If the Koch plant shuts down, we now lose 10% if the nitrogen in the USA, and we instead will ship it in from overseas like China (who literally does not care about polluting the world. China and India produce far more pollution and have a much greater material effect on the state of the environment than the USA, but this is not talked about) So we will be losing the ability to grow good wheat, and eat good cereal, or we will lose our jobs and devastate our communities, while allowing an outside country to do the pollution for us (they won’t make nitrogen in an eco-friendly way). So the harms are great, but the harm of the world ending is conjectural. In society, it’s all about union. The fact that we are United makes us incredibly strong. The industrial worker makes nitrogen, the farmer makes wheat, you and I eat cereal, and we work at our jobs to provide a service or whatever we do for the industrial worker. We are all connected, United we stand. If we remove the industrial worker, society cannot function. I am confident that over time and research, we can find a way to make our industries better and more eco-friendly, while still efficient. I am not a scientist, but we have developed and come so far, I know we can discover ways to make less-pollutant factories, while still make the products and services that you and I enjoy. I’m confident in this, I know society can achieve this. But we should not rush to take out our industries and businesses because try at IS how progress happens. It is how diseases are cured, through science and research, funded by businesses and taxes that government collects from businesses. Smoke stacks are where the products and improvements to our better life are made. We should be thankful that we benefit from them everyday. And we should also seek to improve them, so they emit less smoke. I have no science, but imagine if they churned out a great product that society enjoys and belched out water instead of smoke and fire and brimstone. That would be great, but we don’t have that technology yet. 30 years ago, they had no smart phones, and I’ve lived to see that. 100 years ago there wasn’t commercial air travel which we all enjoy to see friends and relatives. 200 years ago they had no running water in our houses. In my lifetime, I thoroughly look forward to maybe seeing our industries make useful things for society while being more eco-friendly. That would be a dream come true. But regardless, I think we can all take some time to be thankful and appreciate the improvements to our modern lives and progress as a society that they have brought. Sincerely, A.J.S.
You're really not though bro lol looking at the NASDAQ chart is like looking at a lot of circles with me holding a square talking about I can make it fit
This feels like that explanation from the south park episode. "steal underpants." 1. Collect Underpants 2. ???? 3. Profit. Everything makes sense right up until they talk about the profits building railroads, which I assume comes from the cut taken by the brokers, but isn't actually explained in the cartoon.
With a good investment plan that ensures steady incomes without any doubts I am prepared for a well organized retirement. I started investing in stocks 3 years ago and so far with help, I am making a good yield on my dividend.
@Eleanor Woodbead like I stated, I've been putting aside money into stocks and with the assistance of a seasoned-trade analyst, Levi Clemans, who is under a licensed broker. He has been the backbone of my trades. Making a substantial amount of profit, I just renew my investment.
This is great. I’ve come across several comments on Clemans. As a noob, I’d want nothing more than to expert help even if I hope to pay for it. Thanks for looking out for others!
It’s safe to say that Levi is indeed God sent after a series of payouts. I have no concerns about investing more, he flatly turned down my gift token and asked me to give it to charity saying, “God has honored me with everything I need, be His servant and help the less fortunate”.
Then one day the owner of ODM retired and the company was sold to an investment consortium that determined profits could be significantly increased by relocating manufacturing to China ...
Lmao !
Or just more automated in the US
@E. W. I suppose if you define "unrestricted" as "heavily regulated and manipulated by government restrictions", then yes.
@@jerkjerkington3874 It was Reagan deregulation crusade, that destroyed all anti trust law protections, leading to the increased monopolization of everything you see around you.
@@screamingphoenix8113 So by "unregulated" you mean "slightly less regulated than it used to be." And of course that's ignoring the fact that stock exchanges like NYSE and NASDAQ are granted government sanctioned monopolies over the stock market by virtue of the fact that nobody else could possibly meet the government's standards for licensing, or the fact that limited liability corporations themselves a form of undeserved legal immunity granted by the government.
Essentially, what happens is that the government manipulates the market until its cronies can form a monopoly, and then every once in a while it makes a big show of taking some particularly unpopular monopoly down a peg while all the cronies slip out the back door and move on to the next scam. And then it all gets blamed on the free market, because clearly the problem was that peons like us have too much freedom. Obviously government manipulation was never the problem, right?
i literally studied how stocks work and this taught me way quicker.
alot of these old educational videos are like this.
@@SPACEHARICE reminds me of conjunction function!
@@anthonyamaya9644 conjunction junction
@@carldalord what your function
@@iaaz6772 hooking up words and phrases and clauses
I am a beginner, taking baby steps gingerly, I am glad I have come across this video!
Me too!! I’m 52 and just starting this journey. I feel so behind!
It is never too late to get started. It really isn’t. You’ll be kicking back and happy you went through the first few steps in a short few months. Once you have a base, of course, it’s great to keep learning. But it only gets easier :(
Started at 25 now I’m 30 I saved and invested all my money for 5 years besides bills and have no fun in life and still don’t have 100K. IDK how you people do it I’m about to give up and actually enjoy my life.
Stocks are just a fancy way to gamble your money away and like all gambling houses, they’ve got it fixed for themselves.
I believe it’s called (trading) when speculation is involved not gambling Real investing are owning true shares of stock on real businesses with great cashflows with real products and services Investing is such a beautiful thing when studied truly on the concept. Too much corruption confuses the average investor that’s the sad part
I love how intimidating the US gov is treated in this
Based AnCap video?!?!?!
Its not inaccurate
Probably a liberal leaning video
Keep in mind that in general the government was more compitent back then as well, or at least The challenges and pitfalls that it faced it was better equipped to deal with than those it faces currently.
Anytime the Federales show up, it's bad news
"the investment banker decides to help our friend"
And that's how this turned from education, to pure fantasy.
If only our friend had millions of dollars to just buy the investor banker to help him
@@Zeviak he did... "hey I need money to expand my business to meet the demand and will share in the profits gained by doing so."
Same.
As soon as he mentioned the BANKS I paused and I quit watching. Annnnddd I'm gonna give this video a thumbs down.
@@Zeviak Yes, a small business loan from Dad in the amount of a million dollars...
@@analyticalhabitrails9857 oooo, say it ain't so! Not a thumbs down from analytical habitrails!
“They must be profitable to be listed”
Me: *Sees wework and Nikola listed on the exchange* “Yes, only the highest quality”
This was before the days of charlatans getting taxpayer kickbacks.
@@matthew8153 eh, i think charlatans were always there. Probably its the free tax money.
I think it used to be like that, now too much greed.
the Rivian IPO. Ah yes a quality 120B company.
Rivian
Rip, those high school and college students getting turned into cars, refrigerators, etc
HAHAH , spit my coffee
Their sacrifice is appreciated.
And that horsey turned into tractor 🚜
better than turning into an hamburger at Mcdonald or Burger King, haha
I love the sarcastic humor of you north-americans 😂
I laughed so hard when i saw the "Honesty is the best policy" poster in the NY Stock Exchange
Before the days of big corporations and politicians sharing beds that was true.
NY Politicians are known for their honesty
OK, couldn't say that with a straight face...
@@matthew8153 and when was that exactly? Back when the national guard murdered people for trying to unionize?
@@MishaFlower
Don’t make things up.
@@MishaFlower Bro last time I checked America never had it's own version of Tianamen Square.
While yes it is true corruption and greed has had it's influence within America's government since it's inception... We don't outright butcher people for their interests.
At least, we didn't use to.
Nowadays it does seem like a definite possibility, given how one sided the government is now.
Edit: Guess I was wrong, this was an actual thing.
(And apparently this isn't important enough to teach in most history classes.)
Ahhh, yes. The days when every company was expected to make a profit and distribute a portion of that said profit in the form of a dividend. Simpler times.
I miss when dividend stocks were common. Felt like you actually got something from the company growing instead of just playing a zero sum game against your fellow investors, so some rich CEO can sell his private shares when they want a new yacht.
You’re right, zombie companies shouldn’t be allowed. Borrowing money has been too easy the last few decades from banking deregulation. We don’t really have capitalism anymore if losers can keep their doors open.
This is just the system advancing. You’d be an utter fool to believe that these assholes‘ ultimate goal was to pay any kind of if not an ever increasing dividend to you for our money
Dividends are the kiss of death and guarantee the stock will never go anywhere.... You want to invest in businesses that put those profits back into the business for future growth
@@toomanydiscs1056 yeah ofc, you want to "invest" in stocks that are guaranteed to never bring you any fucking return unless some other asshole is willing to pay you more than you paid. genius.
I love how the narrator hesitates before saying “Necessities” as the stockholder buys a really stupid looking hat.
Surprisingly funny for an educational video
More like a very expensive hat
haaaaaats
Also only woman on the whole thing 😅
@@unluckychamp9831 3:53 I dunno man, that seems like a woman to me.
I learned more in nine minutes about adult life than I did from 1-12 grade.
yeww
It doesn't help that they are simplifying things, and outright wrong about others.
Gooblygoo56 ' yeah school really sucks
Gooblygoo56 ' me too like the simplicity
Me too liked the simplicity
It gives me life that people are still watching knowledgeable things like this on TH-cam.
"Must have track record of good management and sales" several years later.... NKLA --> "This Truck Drives" as it rolls down hill
they used a different program to get listed on the New York Stock Exchange. a hint that something was not right with this company.
@@johnhumphrey9953 Was it SPAC?
@@mllrdnl yes
Lmao
@@mllrdnl whats SPAC?
They had him stripped down, tied up, and branded. That's at least half as terrifying as I figured the process would be.
*should
Expected an anguished scream as he was being probed
Now they probably do more things to you from the back.
I've just begun learning about value investing, and I've found that many good stocks are undervalued despite their intrinsic value. If you had quarter of a million to create a strong portfolio, which stock would you choose for better returns?
I believe a solid portfolio should include three key components: ETFs for diversification, dividend stocks for steady cash flow, and top tech stocks. Given your budget, it’s a smart move to consult a fiduciary advisor for professional guidance.
I agree with you. As an early investor in NVDA, AVGO, ANSS, and PLTR, my financial advisor's advice was incredibly helpful. Over the past 7 years, she has helped me find stocks that did 10x multiple times. With her help, I've grown my portfolio to over a million dollars.
I'm trying to find a certified one to boost my investments/portfolio, but it's tough online. Can I get a ref from you, since you know about this stuff?
She goes by ‘’DIANA CASTEEL LYNCH a renowned figure in the financial industry with years decades of experience. I'd suggest you research her further on the web.
Glad to have stumbled upon this, curiously inputted her on the web, easily spotted her consulting page and was able to schedule a call session. Ive seen commentary about advisers but not this phenomenal
if only our education system taught us like this.
+olivia hembrom COMMON CORE
olivia hembrom... You miss, are a gem.
they mostly teach you how to be good employed
Yeah.
Yeah sadly schools teach their students how to be minimum wage rats racers.
wow classic cartoons are so effective.. and that great narrating voice
Why do all narrators from this time period sound the same?!
@@Boringspy because of audio qaulity at the time probably. But they don’t all sound the same
@@Boringspy accent
@@Boringspy It was a desirable fake accent that narrators trained to develop.
It’s “the voice”
I love how they used the ability to produce tanks and artillery in wartime as a bonus
I actually understand now! Goodbye, books! Hello, technicolor!
Nicolas Stanko IKR
Hey there the process has been given how you can raise more capital from public domain is that senerio same in other Juriduction??
Nicolas Stanko when I was a kid, I called it “teachincolor.”
When I was at school at lunch break there was some sort of public class where you could just walk in and learn stuff for an hour while you eat, I'd have much rather learn all about how our finances worked and stuff like that instead of dead monarchs and why they have slanted faces
Why do they have slanted faces ? I wanna know that more than why I'm poor and big banks owe the world
Slanted faces? Go on.
@@usagiwerd6664 just inbreeding and bad food
Honestly, that doesn’t sound like that bad of a class to take.
You know, reducing the whole subject of history to dead monarchs is a bit rude.
Some of the non-tech that I think are positioned to go really up are Home Depot, Delta Airlines, Pool Corp, etc. I have set aside almost $200k for that. I want to know if my projections are right based on technical observations. Any suggestions?
Would recommend a banking company like JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, or WellsFargo. Having a diverse portfolio is key; that being said, Intel and AMD are great stocks to keep an eye on.
Haha I love the buyer/ gunslinger @5:45. That's how you handle your business with your broker!
Yeah! No.
@@woomath6076 yeah.
Very well-done educational cartoon. I always knew that cartoon is best suited for educational purposes, not just entertainment.
Why not both?
@@kyleplatter8954 have you seen modern day comedy? It's a horrible combination.
Hitler also has this perspective
@@yellowbasementrecords651 Damn, daddy Adolf also breathed AIR, a horrible practice still used by billions of people world wide
@@mahmud7645 yes indoctrinating the youth is very nice I agree
As a former broker and current advisor, I can confirm this is accurate, although extremely simplified. There are a LOT more steps involved, and many more facets of the industry. Some key things to point out are that not all common stock issues dividends. Growth stocks reinvest those dividends in an attempt to further grow the company. Large cap stocks are more likely to issue dividends than small or mid cap stocks.
Also, they neglected to mention how the exchange makes money on an agency transaction, like the one described for the round lot of ODM. Since the transaction was made on an agency basis between two brokers, a markup was not charged, but rather a sales commission would be. Only in a principle transaction where the broker/market maker owns the stock will a markup (spread) be charged.
If a company is going to issue new stock, the board of directors needs to vote on it, and a new filing needs to be made with the SEC. The initial offering made by ODM was described as either a pink sheet (OTC) listing or a private placement. If the former, the secondary offering would not be subject to the same scrutiny and regulatory requirements as the primary offering. No new prospectus would need to be issued to new buyers, for example. In a private placement, the secondary offering would be the company’s IPO.
You're right, and also the amount of due diligence between all these steps... Nightmare 😁
The company needs a law department
1955 was a simpler time... ;-)
This comment should be pinned.
tl;dr i don't take the advice of societal vampires
8:18 you can see the exact moment that the system fails in a globalized market.
Omg your right
I think most people are willing to go through another Great Depression in order to cut off China and give our kids a better chance without needing a college degree
@@zombieranger3410 I was 4 years old during the 2008 recession which is kinda like the Great Depression 2.0
@@zacharymogel9500 the difference then and now is then the stockbrokers committed suicide and the market got oversight when now our government bailed all of the companies out and left everyone else to dry.
I like how the young people pipe or of college obey unskilled labor
Hopefully, people know that this video is about a process that no longer exists and no longer takes place. The video only approximates the theory that was in place in the 1980s and earlier, and actually was more complex. Now, the process for most corporate participants (in particular the financing of public corporations) entails other aspects of finance not mentioned here. All of modern stock listings in the U.S. are digitally transacted, contrary to the methods promoted in the video. However, the process of corporate fundraising has changed radically over the last 20-30 years - quite contrary to the presentation in this video (which was probably made in the 1950s or 1960s). The process for trading stocks was not created for common “investors” to transact in, but was modified and redesigned exclusively for the professional trader. You should buy a book on the mechanics of markets before you invest, just so you have a perfunctory understanding of how things work. Otherwise, this video is very misleading for prospective, inexperienced investors.
Dude, you fucking NAILED IT!!! I teach to the new investor and have echoed EXACTLY WHAT YOU'VE STATED. Godbless you, continue to spread the word. I like the video, but it is NOT ACCURATELY REFLECTING THE FINANCIAL MARKETS OF THIS PERIOD...
Anyone with half of a brain should know this is an old 60's film to interest the average Joe to want to invest. But people don't have common sense anymore. They've never seen Gun Smoke, I dream of Jeanie or others like it. You made a very accurate statement and I agree. However, the video did say at the end to get more detailed information before investing. But sometimes with beginners, since things are so complex now, it's good to get back to the basics. True we don't have ticker tapes anymore and much of the Wall ST mania is handled electronically but the same theory and mechanics of it all continue to work the similarly. The problem is that today, people are more dishonest than they were 100 years ago (not to say they weren't dishonest) and with the expedience of media and internet, news flows much more quickly and people don't take the time to do their research (or due diligence as so commonly referred to) and jump right in and end up losing and wondering why. True fact: Everyone WILL lose money in the stock market! Never the less, great statement and I say take the video for face value and not over analyze it. Maybe if everyone could get back to basics the world wouldn't be so difficult.
Your words are boring. Make a neat updated cartoon to explain
Yeah. I'm no expert, but this cartoon obviously portrays the theory of the benefits of investing. No corruption in this ideal cartoon and everything is nice...but what about 1929 or the crashes in the 70s with little gas or the 80s when local businesses got screwed? I'm probably repeating some others but it's clear this isn't perfect.
That's well said. I was getting the same feeling. Now, it's not the same as before
Before diving in into stock market, study and understand the market with a trading simulator before diving in with real cash. it's really helpful. However, my portfolio has been stalling this year. I have approximately $150k stagnant in my reserve that needs growth, any suggestions to grow my portfolio will be highly appreciated.
The market is volatile at this time. I will suggest you get yourself a financial-advisor that can provide you with entry and exit points on the shares/ETF you focus on.
Very true , I diversified my $400K portfolio across multiple market with the aid of an investment advisor, I have been able to generate over $900k in net profit across high dividend yield stocks, ETF and bonds in few months.
Please can you leave the info of your investment advisor here? I’m in dire need for one.
I work with “Diana Casteel Lynch” I understand what it's like to see your portfolio going down. I hope the performance improves.
Thanks for sharing, I just looked her up on the web and I would say she really has an impressive background in investing. I will write her an e-mail shortly.
6:30 thank god this is all done electronically now
Thank god! Now they can just block the buy button!
I can’t fathom how that would even work today with fraud so rampant. They could make buy and sell orders with no I.D except claiming to be somebody on the phone. They had a higher trust society back then.
I watched this first in 2012 or 11 2020 I became a stock trader
Very simple and clear
How?
Most people venture into investments to be a millionaire, meanwhile I just want to be debt free
That's very practical and smart goal, a wise man once said do everything you can to get outta debt, one of his tips to getting rich
Just do the right thing by trading with an expert,
Trust me you will be a millionaire and debt free
The real secret of building wealth is by having multiple streams of income, that's includes both online and offline investments. If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep,you are fated to die working.
It will be wise to invest into crypto
Most people don't invest due to ignorance
dont u just love cartoon help videos
We Were Once Kings 109 likes
so loving it
the heavy quotation marks around necessities of life. on point
I wish cartoons like this were still made. It summarizes a boat load of information in an intriguing manner.
For educational purposes, this is a first class of value!
I think this is best way to explain such subjects...
Great content ,The Stock market is still a fantastic tool for building wealth , however, so it's wise to consider investing even if you don't have much money to spare.
I suggest Dr Romero pieto.
His telegram handle 👇.
As ConsultRomeropieto.
Best trading video watched so far for the day.
After months of profitless trading i have come to a point where I can trade and make profit all thanks to you Mr pieto.
This is my first introduction to stocks, and boy am I glad that this is what I watched to learn.
Sadly it's outdated
@@azathoththe3rd In a sense, it's not. Stocks are still physical, there's just a number of layers of abstraction with IoT stock exchanges.
Nice to see YELP stock on the NYSE ticker tape in 1957. Definitely ahead of their time.
I‘m currently having a class on corporate law and history and this was actually really helpful.
Who is here in 2024?
❤
Me
Why isn't TJT in " the clink" 34 counts of FRAUD!
Us
☝️
I have a question. How much of the profits is a company legally committed to pay to its stock owners?
depend on the type of share either common or preferred share; preferred stock are paid a specific amount agreed at the moment it was bought it will never be less or more if you stock is for 10$ that's what you will get. On the other hand common stock are more like been part of the company between you and the other owners it is decided how the dividends will be used, in other word common stock varys. Sometime for the sake of the company it might be decided to use it to invest on improving the company, other times the company has made so little profit that after paying all its necessity their is no or very little money to be able to pay you or the others; other time the company might have as example 200 millions on dividends and you own 25% of the stock and 100% of the dividend will be split between investors; so you have earned 50 millions in a shot! and suddenly next time their is a crisis and the company has 500 dollars dividend and you get 125$ (if they even choose to split that); so as you see their is benefit and risks one will provide a solid secure amount the other will be more risky but might give you 1000% or more profit all the sudden.
Blazerelf Thank you for that, great and enlightening answer!! If you don't mind, here's a few more: How do you affect how a company makes more money as an investor? I can understand an expert going in, buying 30% shares, turning his "trick", the company runs better and they make more money - if that is even legal. But how about stock traders? Those who don't know anything about what the company does - How do they make money on stocks? Is that a misconception? I mean, in order to buy stocks at the right moment, you must know something about the business' logistics, right? You can't just look at the profit graph all day through, to me that just seems like gambling! Also, why do the leader board of a company choose to pay out dividends to stock owners, and just not take everything for themselves? What good do small time stock owners do for a company? If I own 1 stock at 10$ in a 1 million stock company, why would they even bother paying out? Do the amount they pay have to be split evenly to all stock holders? I highly appreciate your time.
yeah is definitely legal warren buffet is rich because of this, he invest in other companys and sell share for more or get alot of money from them; he is pretty elder he bought decades ago shares of company like Coca-cola, Gaico, banks and other known business when they were kind of small and look how big they are now so he got big too; but he has also lost loook for example Lehman brothers that went bankrupt he had share their and that was a lost, their is nothing wrong with that you have to have a good eye and the video said it, the company swears their financial info is true, the investors look at that info to determine if your company is worth spending their money on. Nothing illegal on that.
Stockholders make money by commission; my teacher use to tell me investor are like grand leagues because you must have a lot of money to be at that level but that doesn't mean you are a pro at investing in shares; stockholder is that person you hire to advice you in how to do so he is like a lawyer that know more about the system and tells you whats is best for your money andafter a decision is taken he is also who makes the investment or purchase; some people trust their stock holder enough to allow them to invest their money without even asking them; their commission depend a lot of how big is the investment and the results from it.
Prevously you said they dont known nothing about the company, definetly they dont and they dont need to, they need is numbers; the financial informarmation is not a day to day graph is a annual or semestral information; you can follow the tendencies of a company also their is different type of tables and graphs to determine different info; it is not as simple as you might think where ag uy looks at a graph and sees the company made alot of money this year and you conclude is good. Let me give a simple example: you are a stock holder and your client wishes to invest in common stocks and the company shows that after he pays all its bills and accounts it has 500 millions which sound like alot, but common invertor gets paid last so you still need to see how much the preffered get, boom! it shows they get a unchangable mandatory amount of 300 million in total so now their is remaining 200 mill for all the coomon inv, still you have to know how many are they and what % in the share you would posses? let says he was interest on a 20% that means he can profit 40 mil which is great still. But as a professional you find a problem an account showing the company borrowed 200 millions, based on that you can conclude the company would have not make profit for the common investor if not becasue of the borrowing, you look back and see how many time the company has borrowed money and deduce how much does the company depend on debts, their is also something called financial indicators which are equations you can use to calculate diffent factor 9of a company as how indebted how much profit is really from sells, how much % in averageinvestor make.
So as you see their is a lot of tools a stock broker or anybody can use to determine their risk, mathematics, number don't lie you just need to be well educated. Stills as you said the investor is gambling because nobody can predict perfectly when will that company fall; apple coulod fall tomorow and the numbers did not say so, another global financial crisis mayt happen tomorow you never know; but the numbers can help you reduce the falure probabilitys
123TauruZ321
you last questions said ¿why do the leader board of a company choose to pay out dividends to stock owners, and just not take everything for themselves?
I believe you refer to why the leaders pay share owners, the reason is because the leaders ARE THE SHARE OWNERS if you bough common share you are one of those guys sitting their taking decision on how will you all be paid (unless you have preffered share in that case you must always get paid as established and not paying them would be as not paying an employer, which is illegal), depending in how much shares you got it determines how much your vote weights in the board of directors; sometimes they choose to not pay the full amount the company has made in dividends becasue they feel investing it on improving the company or as a saving is better; its like in the government where their is an assembly, suggestion are given for new laws or decision and votes are counted for a resolution
What good do small time stock owners do for a company? If I own 1 stock at 10$ in a 1 million stock company, why would they even bother paying out? Do the amount they pay have to be split evenly to all stock holders? JAJA i remember I asked this to my teacher, as I said before he wold me investors like "major leagues" people who can afford huge investment, almost nobody buys 1 share. Anyways Lets say someone did, yes they would have to pay me my % anyways although it is extremely small lol; but it is a bad idea because buying that share costed me money since you had to pay commission to the stock holder and it is usually about 40$ or less per transaction also the amount you might get from dividend might be too small example 100,000 share you buy one and the company is splitting 5million you have earned 50$, minus any fees, taxes or whatever you will be charged, notice your profit is way lower than all the money you made on that small share, he i have link with more details www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/143.asp
Thank you so much man, highly appreciated! It is a very interesting "game", or line of work. Could listen to it for hours. I am at a crossroads in life now, where I am trying to choose a new education, at age 30. Thinking of taking a degree in economics and marketing, just to see what sticks or not. I need big responsibility in order to get out of bed. Been working in the building industry most of my adult life and I know 100%, you don't ever have a chance at getting rich from that ^^ But in the world of paper and stocks, you do have a chance. I work hard, am very honest and have good ethics. I am also good at spotting liars and keeping them at bay. I want to give it a shot. What do you think? Thank you again!! :-) :-) Great link too!
The first time I fully understand about stock market after more than 25 years of thinking about how it works
“Broad distribution of shares” does not seem to be a requirement these days
What do you mean?
It is a old video
It is to be listed on a stock market, not to be incorporated. That’s one thing which hasn’t changed over the years.
ah back before the classic "not financial advise" days
As a science student I understood almost nothing of stock and share markets. This animation just made my concept a lot better.
Stock broker.
A man who does literally no work but makes more than the people who make everything he needs to survive.
Actually his job used to be pretty risky. You have to identify which stocks will yield the highest earnings. Also make sure you don't lose your clients' money. This job required a lot of skill, intuition, and research.
@@Sonyim414
"Im glad my job isn't so risky"
-Coal miner 2000 feet below the surface
@@Galdenberry_Lamphuck 1. coal miners have a certain guaranteed income, brokers do not. 2. Skilled vs unskilled labor. Anyone can be a coal miner, but not anyone can be a broker. Therefore, it makes sense skilled laborers get paid more.
@@Sonyim414 I guarantee a stock broker would not last a week in a coal mine. They don't have the lobes for it.
@@Sonyim414 It used to be a high-risk-high-reward job wjere you needed to be smart to succeed, now it's too often about market manipulation and scamming suckers out of their money.
I have to say, this was much easier to digest and understand than the other explanations I've heard
It's so pleasant to see these made purely to be informative with no 'earwigging' manipulation.
If only things really did work this way.
Lol they did when Colorado was full of fucking six shootin cowboys. It still gets the gist of it. Things have just gotten, a liiittle bit strange.
They did until OBM realized they could have higher profit margins and larger dividends if they moved their operations overseas. So the shareholders ousted the founder of the company and the board moved the operation to China.
,s z g
I would expect to find at this point, at least three to five specific tracks of deviation emanating from each particular partition of investments in all realms. Particularly, the investment banking political interface mode. The pharmaceutical industries interface nexus with the regulatory bodies and the CIA and also the nexus between all media and all elecitve bodies..
That means at the initial point of primary level inferface. That projects into at least 40 potential pathways in wihch various derivitive types of corruption can be currently generating... The major types of corruption are, hierachical, policy based, direct proffitting. Endanger the public prolfit and political leverage.... It almost requires a specific set of exppertise in order for one to be abke to authentically confront this octapus... But the task must be done, for to not do so will create a wide spread breakdown on multiple levels for the entire civilzation... Thats not hyperbolic, thats actual..
kant what do you mean ? It's worse now ?
How interesting the cartoon cuts right before discussing Any risks in Share Trading.
Great cartoon. Stuff like this really deserves more appreciation because the charm makes the education last in your mind longer.
Never have j ever seen a more honest depiction of American manufacturing being used as a means for the military industry.
Chilling…
The best way to explain the stocks ever ❤️❤️❤️
so this is how it works my word... I can't wait to take my first baby steps in this world of business. im still in my 20's
At 4:10 the receptionist’s face just starts bouncing for no reason 😂
she's chewing gum.
@@LJdaentertainerno way she usin that amount of muscle and movement to chew gum thats an alien 💀
I feel like I learned so much and absolutely nothing at the same time
This covers basics more than a webinar
Old Skool! Great, classic animation and very informative.
This seems quite old, although I am guessing this is the same way things are happening - just faster and on a bigger scale. Thanks.
I came for the stock market education and I left with the existential dread of just how ravenous capitalistic consumerism can get when left unchecked. 10/10
You commies are unbearable. Capitalism isn't evil every system is flawed, Capitalism just seems to work the best.
*soviet national anthem intensifies*
@@ericisedgy3446 *our* capitalism
Crony capitilism isn't capitalism
Wow no one cares bud
It's amazing how I know every word in the intro and outro
I also have a question. Initially if a company enters the stock exchange to due the need of money, why does it still stay on the stock market when it is financial sounds and is prosperous?
financially sound its not because of profit it's because of public money but as you said company even can buy it's own stocks from stock market whenever it wants even it can delisted from stock exchange if it holds 90 % of its own stock ;)
g0ds0n123 why use your money when you can gamble with other peoples money.
simple, because the industry is always growing. you saw how the small business went from making a few drums to making dozens of drums, but soon more customers demanded more business so he expanded again. this keeps happening as the industries keep growing and growing, and new and better services are made. so they still need more capital from stock sales to fund it
The owners of the shares can then sell them to others at any time, as happened in the cartoon. To leave the stock market would require a buyback of those stocks freely traded by the stockholders every day.
@@fatpotatoe6039 not to mention, when a corporation gets large enough it isn't just one person at the top calling the shots, there's a board of directors they have to answer to, and they all have a stake in the company as well. it's far harder for one person to make major changes that way, so the company is more stable
Who is here in end of 2024? 1:02
Me
Me
6 days later 👋
Basically go to supreme court or court registry go to bank investment and then get security and exchange to read the info then judge.
@1:33 not anymore...
And how are those dividends paid out? Stealing from those workers actually working to produce the goods.
Indeed, after a certain number of dividends, the stock/share should be closed as paid out with profit and thereafter the company should issue new shares.
Leave the workers and their salaries alone.
@@tehCOMMAOr at least to also give them shares as a long term reward for their labour.
I already knew 90% of this but I got an absolute kick out of it. 😃
Imma show this video to my kids whenever i have them.. This is gem to begin the knowledge
Was this like actually created back in the 69s or something, or simply made to reflect on that period? It looks incredibly authentic.
lol. 69s.
Its even older than that...1952. "What Makes Us Tick" 1952 New York Stock Exchange production.
@@itrthho wow. Bet Buffett watched this video back then
@@itrthho How do you even know that?
@@itrthho It's not an independent source of information, but still a nice bit of animation and pro-stock market propaganda.
This did answer one thing I have wondered about for ages. I never knew simply owning the stock gave dividends. What little i heard always made it sound like the only way to make money in stocks was to sell them for more then you bought them for.
If my dearly departed grandfather is to be believed he sold the founder of PepsiCo some of his first soda fountains. He didn't have enough money to pay him there but offered him a 10% share of the company. But dear old grandpa just said he could pay him later, which he did. But now seeing this I know the dividends from PepsiCo stocks would have made my family rich enough that i and my brothers would have never needed to work.
Damnnnn, there are no better simple explanation than this one, I've got the overview, now I could read some books about basic stock/cryptocurrency investment without being totally blind. Thank you so muchhh!!!!
7:53 Communications 😂 That’s great
This is how I always enjoyed being educated without knowing just entertained just like when the teacher had us watch a video was the best
Ur gay bro. On god.
It grinds my gears seeing that analogy they use for college.
Objects on a conveyor belt line. Treating students like objects which do not think for themselves. They go to college without asking why. And leave thinking they’re doing the right thing. They thought they knew what they were doing, but they didn’t.
why schools don´t teach this way? if something is fun to learn you pay more attention and it´s easier to catch.
Except it has nothing to do with quality of product. These days, it’s more common to have a crappy product or service and have the CEO and board make $50,000,000 apiece while the customer suffers, then the board cashes out when they go out of business.
I love this video. I’m doing a stock market game for my class and we watched thus video!
This is great. I learned SO much from this. And the animation is simply adorable! A really awesome video!!!
I've watched this video in my financial class. Thanks, it really helped.
I love how idealistic these educational videos were. 👍
Man, they used to explain stuff so much better. I’ve watched numerous modern TH-cam on how stocks work and this explained it best. I also like the old black and white videos explaining horsepower, transmissions, stuff like that
Well, that's probably because it's a lot more complicated than this video now.
Thats like watching a video about an ancient single celled organism and being like "well gee, I've been studying this whole big human physiology textbook for a year. What a waste of time that was! Should have just watched the 5 minutes prokaryote video and then applied for med school"
@@JJ-iu5hl for me it does help to get a simpler understanding first though
@@dipsyteletubbie802 The point is, it's not accurate. You can make it as simple as you want, but if the materials just isn't correct, it's worthless.
The joke at 8:00 was pretty risquée for elementary school.
This should be required viewing at every school
amusing, entertaining, educational...!
Then next day, a SHF decided that they should short ODM, 200%+ shorted. Cut to next scene where fisherman is able to sell easily, but cowboy can't buy because the BUY button was turned off.
Bruh its 11:04 at night and im still watching this it went from honda crx modded cars to how stocks work back to back
As long as you check a companies financial statements and price to earnings ratio, you will run lower risk. I created my portfolio about 3 weeks ago with a quarter in British equity, yet Brexit hasn't had a catastrophic impact on my portfolio. It fell by 6% in two days because I had municipal bonds to cancel out losses, however it has almost recovered back to breakeven at only -1%. It has recovered in just 2 or 3 days. Stocks are grand if you are careful.
How is it going now?
What about now?
Lmao “I created my portfolio 3 weeks ago and it hasn’t collapsed yet” no shit buddy, ya gotta give it time
Where is the lesson about pump and dump schemes?
Wall street Wolf?
Can’t believe this video is 12 years old. Straight to the point. Cartoon illustrations made more clear.
Now the IPOs come before the corporations have any revenue.
And then major outsourcing happens.
that produces great wealth
+awsomeguy001 outsourcing produces great a
wealth?
+awsomeguy001 for who exactly?
It creates jobs for Chinese people and cheaper prices for us!
A door True, but I don't feel that just having cheaper prices is enough, as there are several factors that bring that price back up from import tax to a higher min wage for the employees at distribution level. The only marginally cheaper price doesn't make up for the fact that the jobs most readily available still don't make enough to buy the marginally cheaper products. See company's don't lose money if they can help it, they'll just raise their profit margin if thye know peps will buy the thing.
Where's the part when vulture capital interests buys the company, forces the company to take on a massive amount of extra debt, and then the company goes bankrupt and it's assorted pieces are sold off?
I love how they literally put pollution (smoke stacks) in so many scenes as a measure of increased improvement and progress.
You’re thinking about it from the nowaday progressive. However, from the classical liberal, this meant jobs taking care of families, new inventions to make life easier, useful products that improve our quality of life.
It’s about weighing the costs and benefits, and we should do something that provides the most benefit to society.
Traditionally, we have said that improving our quality of life, making useful inventions, and providing jobs to provide for families is greater weight than smoke stacks belching fire and brimstone into the air.
The nowaday progressive equate that with the world ending, though, so of course if something literally ends the world, it is heavier weight than increasing our quality of life, jobs taking care of families, and so on and so forth.
If the word is literally ending, that’s the heaviest thing. The question becomes to what extent is having this factory damaging the earth, and what is the likelihood that those impacts will be severe/extreme/or world ending? Is the chance for the world to have a higher temperature or is the world as a matter of fact, literally coming from an end? What is the likelihood of that? Which is more significant, the improvements of quality of life that we all enjoy, the products that we all enjoy, the technology that makes us incredibly in tune with society all together at once, the jobs providing for billions of families or the likelihood that the harm will be great (world ending ).
This is the question we have to weigh. I don’t think we should be ignoring the earth and her environment, since God has called us to be good stewards of this earth and the wonderful nature that is given to us. We should conserve it, I am an Eagle Scout, and I love nature. I’ve raised horses all my life and enjoy fishing and growing wheat. We can certainly be concerned with environment. But we should absolutely not get rid of the great things that these smoke stacks give us.
A better way of life, and easier way to live, jobs and provision for our loved ones. These are all incredible things. I enjoy eating cereal, it’s my favorite breakfast.
However did you know the cereal that was grown with wheat was made with nitrogen implants into the soil so that we could have an efficient crop yield? That nitrogen was produced for the entire country in nitrogen plants, such as the one outside my hometown.
The nitrogen plant, called the Koch plant, provides 10% of all the nitrogen in the USA. And it provides HUNDREDS of jobs for families in my community. The Koch plant is involved throughout our community as well, sponsoring events, and giving back to the community in ways that make me enjoy having them in our lives. They provide meaningful support to local youth sports teams, a foundation to build a community around, and tons of nitrogen so you and I can enjoy cereal for breakfast everyday.
To say that the Koch plant is evil, or harming society is incredibly wrong. They provide meaningful interactions and support for thousands, even millions through their nitrogen.
To say that they should be discontinued is wrong and incorrect. What about the people it would affect? This is also not a conjectural harm, a “it might maybe happen, but we don’t know how bad” harm, like the world ending - this is a guaranteed harm. If the Koch plant shuts down, we now lose 10% if the nitrogen in the USA, and we instead will ship it in from overseas like China (who literally does not care about polluting the world. China and India produce far more pollution and have a much greater material effect on the state of the environment than the USA, but this is not talked about)
So we will be losing the ability to grow good wheat, and eat good cereal, or we will lose our jobs and devastate our communities, while allowing an outside country to do the pollution for us (they won’t make nitrogen in an eco-friendly way).
So the harms are great, but the harm of the world ending is conjectural.
In society, it’s all about union. The fact that we are United makes us incredibly strong. The industrial worker makes nitrogen, the farmer makes wheat, you and I eat cereal, and we work at our jobs to provide a service or whatever we do for the industrial worker. We are all connected, United we stand.
If we remove the industrial worker, society cannot function. I am confident that over time and research, we can find a way to make our industries better and more eco-friendly, while still efficient. I am not a scientist, but we have developed and come so far, I know we can discover ways to make less-pollutant factories, while still make the products and services that you and I enjoy. I’m confident in this, I know society can achieve this.
But we should not rush to take out our industries and businesses because try at IS how progress happens. It is how diseases are cured, through science and research, funded by businesses and taxes that government collects from businesses.
Smoke stacks are where the products and improvements to our better life are made. We should be thankful that we benefit from them everyday. And we should also seek to improve them, so they emit less smoke. I have no science, but imagine if they churned out a great product that society enjoys and belched out water instead of smoke and fire and brimstone. That would be great, but we don’t have that technology yet. 30 years ago, they had no smart phones, and I’ve lived to see that. 100 years ago there wasn’t commercial air travel which we all enjoy to see friends and relatives.
200 years ago they had no running water in our houses.
In my lifetime, I thoroughly look forward to maybe seeing our industries make useful things for society while being more eco-friendly. That would be a dream come true. But regardless, I think we can all take some time to be thankful and appreciate the improvements to our modern lives and progress as a society that they have brought. Sincerely,
A.J.S.
Woah I kinda get it know…
Wow, this taught me more than a class did.
Guess I’m just really dumb lol
You're really not though bro lol looking at the NASDAQ chart is like looking at a lot of circles with me holding a square talking about I can make it fit
@@phantomsoldier87
Jesus Christ, lol
Well hopefully I keep on learning more on this scary ass lecture lmao
This feels like that explanation from the south park episode. "steal underpants."
1. Collect Underpants
2. ????
3. Profit.
Everything makes sense right up until they talk about the profits building railroads, which I assume comes from the cut taken by the brokers, but isn't actually explained in the cartoon.
I like how this is drawn and animated for some reason, it really stands out to me.
This is interesting stuff to know. I just saw the Big Short, and I can't believe that those people got away with all that stuff.
Punishment will be according to the law… that’s a good one!😂😂😂😂😂
With a good investment plan that ensures steady incomes without any doubts I am prepared for a well organized retirement. I started investing in stocks 3 years ago and so far with help, I am making a good yield on my dividend.
@Eleanor Woodbead like I stated, I've been putting aside money into stocks and with the assistance of a seasoned-trade analyst, Levi Clemans, who is under a licensed broker. He has been the backbone of my trades. Making a substantial amount of profit, I just renew my investment.
@Eleanor Woodbead Leviclemans(a)Gmai
Lcom...Is he taking commissions for trades? Yes, I’m I still making money in the process? Hell yes!
This is great. I’ve come across several comments on Clemans. As a noob, I’d want nothing more than to expert help even if I hope to pay for it. Thanks for looking out for others!
It’s safe to say that Levi is indeed God sent after a series of payouts. I have no concerns about investing more, he flatly turned down my gift token and asked me to give it to charity saying, “God has honored me with everything I need, be His servant and help the less fortunate”.
Clemans has been known to do rapes
Then another bank dumps the stock and the corp is going bankrupt, despite working 24/7 and selling millions of products with profit.
I watched this in high school. We were taught about this & other topics on financial literacy.
I own many shares of our future. and I still feel it's bleak.