This new information helps to confirm how complex our planet really is. Certainly much more complex than it was thought to be when I started my amateur studies in geology 60 years ago. Plate tectonics was in its infancy back then. Who would ever have thought there is an inner-inner core? What a fascinating time to be alive! Arthur Holmes would be absolutely blown aware.
Wait a minute! I can understand how the Journey to the Center of the Earth might be a little farfetched, however, Jules Verne’s adventures he describes in one of his masterpiece’s, The Mysterious Island, was just a work of fiction? There’s no way! I mean after all the world is flat🤭😜 😂🤣, jk
So very interesting that modern seismic instruments can now measure our planets internal "harmonic resonances" is amazing! That fact that the differences in the resonance frequencies can now reveal hidden inner structures of our home planet is simply astounding!
They can't slice open the planet to see if they are right they don't even a damaged planet to look at to see if they are close. They have no way of checking to see if their instruments are making the correct readings, how do they know if the instrument is reading wrong. They have no way to check it.
@@charlestaylor3195just because you don't understand how they check it doesn't mean nobody does. Consider studying seismology before pretending you know it's all wrong
"Shaped like some kind of donut." You can't leave us hanging like that... what kind of donut? Glazed... chocolate with rainbow sprinkles... that weird tractor wheel one... anything but Boston Cream....
@tsm688 a simple electric motor. Iron core surrounded by another metal when spun creates a charge. Not sure of any rate of rotation of course, just making an observation.
So... we may have some kind of toroidal electromagnet in the Earth's outer core, the current possibly driven by an interaction between core convection and differentiation of 'metals' between the outer core 'proper' and said torus. If such wild imaginings might be true, it would be interesting to try to model a differentiated terrestrial-type planet to see if this is something that might arise spontaneously or requires 'special' circumstances, such as being whacked by a 'Theia'.
Bullet into a coconut. I will have to rewatch Anton's two recent vids to confirm details, but to my memory at this time, he said results of studies put the Theia/moon deal in some doubt. I look at the donut like less dence detritus raising from the outer core like slag on my welding projects. Maybe the earth's spin pushing it out toward the equator to make it toroid.? I am a big fan of the Theia theory based on a proper cool mashup and lifegiving results basis. I hope I will follow the truth.
@@jamesphillips2285 the internet is a plus, but not mandatory. Precision timestamps are mandatory, for when it's time to crunch the numbers. Although, tossing in light elements in a model, that gave me an instant headache. Hell, water even goes beyond ultraweird in the middle mantle, the rest aren't gonna behave any saner deeper and hotter.
This channel and nature is so amazing! This pale blue dot not only includes everybody we’ve ever known but also a geodynamo that not only keeps us safe from the same thing that gives us life but also provides lightshows in doing so. Thanks for the daily reminder Anton!❤
Kind of gives credit to the Fermi paradox idea that we may be alone because it was an extreme sequence of Lucky events that allowed life to begin on this planet.
@@WayneBraack yeah the dynamo and maybe even stuff like plate tectonics is essential for life’s evolution, but as long as we only have ourselves as the only data point we can’t take the equation seriously. I think the biggest factors are the distances and in our case also the timescale. We were only sending out signals in the beginning of the electronics age and if we don’t unite as a people we won’e even move beyond Earth.
@@hurmzz It may also be necessary to host a relatively large moon, along with plate tectonics and the other Earth variables. Our Moon's effect on tides could have been necessary to mix ocean waters.
I bet you if you were to plug in the Central point point around which the moon and the Earth rotate which is just under the surface along that donut path, you would see something pretty cool. For a long time I believed that the moon's orbit of the Earth is responsible for stirring our mantle because we rotate through that center It's the one thing that we have that's different from Venus and Venus doesn't have a magnetosphere
I can just see Homer Simpson's reaction now (rolls his head back and drools.) But, seriously, I'm also reminded of Mary Tyler Moore's (as Laura Petrie) joke on "The Dick Van Dyke Show"--the reason for going to the center of the earth is to find out whether it's chewy or chocolate cream.
Seems pretty consistent with known physics, if we have a molten core, then it seems to reason that nature is granular in nature, so a transitions from solid to molten should exist.
@@TS-jm7jm indeed, they've also established novel phases of ice within the mantle. So yeah, things get beyond weird with pressure and temperature. I don't know of current models could even handle a belt of light elements being incorporated, they might need a complete re-write of the software!
This kind of thing is the reason why I’m studying geology. I personally think that if there’s anything in science that seems very simple, it’s probably because we don’t know a whole lot about it. It’s very exciting to be going into a field of study that just had a major breakthrough and is having a ton of new discoveries made in it.
Yup, colation, rotation and enthalpy are the primary functions to annalyse in all rotational bodies. Such dohnuts or (Shells) as my stuff predicts can be found in anything with a spin, mass and internal degrees of freedom. Nice Video Anton.. Cheers Mate..
@@craig7350 Yes but I would sort of expect the lines for the boundaries to extend radially from the center, not parallel to the equator. It's interesting.
Obviously a donut along the equator. Now think of atoms. Sure, Laguerre polynomials and spherical harmonics describe their clouds *perfectly*, but can there be a really deep & yet unseeable inner donut that determines the angular randomness?
It always drives me crazy when people say the core is "solid iron", while at the same time saying radioactive decay is what heats the earth. Like obviously the deepest part of the core is full of Uranium and other radioactive elements, just look at how much Uranium is in the Crust. It boggles my mind that this is never mentioned.
@@StuffandThings_ well either the core is kept rotating and molten by its radioactive elements or, its only a result of the collision with thea and we are constantly cooling from in out. However i'd like to point out every element past iron is made in a supernova, or collision of neutron stars. And we had tons of heavier elements on earths crust, and more should be in middle then in our crust. Our whole solar system has been bombarded with elements from things we never seen.
Hiya Anton, thanks so much for your videos, they are all so well done and very interesting. When you have time, can you review the astronomical research on Planet 9 and what it could be made of? There was some interesting speculation recently, that it could be a 'dark matter' planet? Is this possible?
THe core of the other planet, Thea, would have been mixed in with the mantle as it impacted earth, and any angular momentum transferred into the molten core of Thea, from earth's rotation, would have caused the iron core of the other planet to precipitate down onto the core layers of the earth's existing core, and that would explain the "inner carbonaceous material" that you postulated could have evaporated from our core, could have been instead, collected from Thea, not from earth bubbling it up as you surmised at 6:21 into the video. Great work Anton, I love catching your daily videos and learning something new.
Brilliant segment Anton.Petrov, thanks for sharing utterly exciting information. Mankind progresses forwards and new horizons open. If only we could all learn to live in peace and cooperation heh? Still, each tiny step towards a goal is a step closer. Thanks for the vid upload.
There were discussions in science, 20 or 30 years ago, about the idea/hypothesis of a nuclear-georeactor at the inner most part of the Earth's core. It also appeared in a science magazine of that time; probably New Scientist or Scientific American. It was deemed to be responsible for the heat generated from the core. I did not hear any of these words used in recent videos from this Y.T. source. This information may prove useful for people with sufficient time to research such matters in more depth.
Hmm. I thought we had evidence that our magnetic field has not always had stable poles. If the donut is there solely due to earth rotation I would imagine it has been that way through several variations on our magnetic field.
Hey there, i have been following you for some time. I really appreciate the content that youve been working on, many thanks! I just started playing the video, and ill keep watching. I think youll want to research Richard C Hoagland ET Hyperdimensional physics. The work of Stan Tenen from Meru Foundation is also super interesting, Geometric Metaphors of Life. Everything is interconnected... I think there might be some useful puzzlepieces for you in there. Peace
If it is concave on the inside it should also possess a tensor field effect. That harmonic tension field produces frequencies which may account for gravity magnetism etc...
Near the core centre the pressure is very high but zero gravitational forces. If the core is spinning the centrifugal forces will effect heavier elements more creating a ring like structure. The same centrifugal principle is used to seperate uranium isotopes for enrichment. Because gravity is neutral at the core centre, all atoms are essentially weightless, so the idea that lighter elements would float is not relevant. They have different mass but are almost totally weightless.
The basic premise to create a magnetosphere, whether around a planet or a star, requires a fluid that experiences convection, conduction, and rotation. When these conditions are present, a dynamo will spontaneously develop. Any one of those conditions not satisfied, no magnetosphere. It's actually much better understood than Anton suggests.
I very much appreciate your videos. They say that you should ignore the comments. But, only ignore the ignorant haters who are fishing for a reaction I say. Otherwise, I say, pay attention. Because some folks will have valid critiques and others will have valid accolades. I, good sir, give you accolades. I appreciate your straightforward curiosity into piercing the veil of reality. Please, I mean this earnestly, keep it up. I need it.
Hey @whatdamath I have a math problem: If i watched 3 of your videos every two days, given you upload a new video every day, how long would it take me to finish all of them?
Another piece of the puzzle to help us figure out why Mars and Venus don't have internal magnetic fields anymore, and yet Earth, Mercury and even Ganymede do.
Correct. Why claim anything until those questions are answered, because they play a vital and necessary part to their guess work. You have to have all the pieces to make the puzzle complete.
Gravitational imaging arrays using low cost but very sensitive gravitational sensors can use time of flight correlation to image regions anywhere inside the earth at high resolution. There are many desktop, even portable alternatives. Atomic clocks, gravity gradiometers, many kinds of gravimeters, some of the "quantum detectors" and more. Many groups can take advantage of multiple improvements in low noise amplifiers, ADCs, data engineering, machine learning and more. Plus better global sharing and integration of data from many source and very different types. These are "speed of light and gravity" signals, not seismic. And they can track in near real time the seismic signal, and after the fact from recordings. So it gives an independent look at what is going on. Mapping the interior of the earth by temperature, density, pressure, and then by elements, isotopes and molecular species means better benchmarks and constraints on models of everything going on inside the earth. More aggressive three axis, real time, high sampling rate measure of the magnetic and gravitational fields will mean a complementary model to view and make sense of the seismic datasets. Yes, the global open sharing of all geophysical, satellite, solar system, astrophysical, communication, and power system field data is happening and making it possible (by correlation and machine learning) to fill in the gaps, plan and very deliberately design new sensor arrays. Filed as (Global networks of low cost, three axis, time of flight gravimeters and gradiometers for 3D imaging of the Earth, atmosphere and oceans) Richard Collins The Internet Foundation
Hmmm. Going out on a limb beyond my expertise here, but if the magnetosphere is necessary for life, necessary to protect life from solar radiation and so on, and if the donut is both fundamental to the generation of the magnetosphere and a relic of the remnant of the collision with Theia, then wouldn't such an event potentially be a truly massive bottleneck for the Drake Equation / Great Filter? In other words, if such an event was necessary to create the conditions that create us, wouldn't the wild improbability of a repeat mean perhaps we are alone after all?
How can we possibly geo engineer this donut to possibly increase our fields strength, or should we leave it alone and go for a more topical type approach (upper-most atmosphere manipulation) to extend the range of our planets magnetosphere before it gets any lower. Yes, the breakdown of our field may be quite a ways out however if we wait till then it'll be to late if that makes sense.
If we look at magnetism via magnetohydrodynamics, it would be something of a consideration that the curl of the magnetic field, and the torque therein, on the locations perpendicular to poles of the magnetic field would wind up having different liquid-solid metal interface. So this curling force would cause different convection cells in a torus around the inner-core outer-core interface... Probably. Edit: TLDR, this one GRAD cross B = Mu_0 (J + Ɛ_0 (partial derivative of E with respect to t)
In regards to the innermost core, could there be a blackhole that has minimal enough mass to develop an accretion disk that wouldn't collapse and instead would continue to form a "shell" of sorts that could become a planet given enough time?
Its crazy how thin the crust we live on is. The volume of the core and the churning molten rock generating a manetic field that stops the life giving Sun from killing us is well beyond my comprehension 😄
Maybe the donut like structure influences Earth's space-time at the north and south pole? The Earth's poles experience time more slowly, and the rest of the donut latitudes proceed with much faster time since there is slightly more gravity. In theory, the polar ice caps of Earth (and Mars) are millions of years in the past relative to the equator. That is why they have large sheets of ice on them that existed millions of years ago along the Earth's ~more equatorial region during the ice age!? I'm wondering if the Earth's rotation could be just an effect of spacetime and this donut.
The more they discover how truly complex our planet is the more I believe chances other planets have all this going for them to sustain intelligent life is very slim
The coriolis effect would be applied to seismic waves too, right? Re the donut: is it possible it's a tidal effect from the moon? Does it line up with the moon's path? I'm assuming not. If there are lower pressure pockets in the mantle and outer core, they'd mess with the state of matter there, right? Making the mantle molten and the outer core solid, maybe? Weird to think about. I wish I'd paid more attention during physics.
As mass shifts from the surface toward the core, the rotational velocity of the earth will increase, causing the calendar to increase by one part in 72 or 5 days.
The chunks appear to line up with Africa, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Not sure if there's a deeper relationship but I wouldn't be surprised if the chunks were having an influence on the crust.
I watched another astronomy related video recently, it mentioned inner cores of planets.. although clearly I didn't retain much information from the video though... 😆 So - question.. Is it true that Earth's inner core moves in an unusual or atypical way compared to other planets? Like, it spins slowly counter to what's expected? Is that because we were impacted by another proto-planet that broke off a chunk that became the moon?
Any thoughts on the increasingly popular idea of a cyclical 12000 year solar cycle that greatly impacts earth and causes major changes? Would love you to make a video talking about it whatever your opinion on the matter is!
Catastrophism is enough to get Anton shut down by his peers as they hate this fact and call us kooks. They only accept that things happen very very slowly and Lord forbid any cyclical catastrophic timeline as it means they need to redo geology and lots of natural sciences. Peers are punks.
Catastrophism is enough to get Anton shut down by his peers as they hate this fact and call us kooks. They only accept that things happen very very slowly and Lord forbid any cyclical catastrophic timeline as it means they need to redo geology and lots of natural sciences. Peers are punks.
@@jedahn It's only bad for his career if it's true and he says it is true but if it is the truth it will come out faster the more people talk about it and soon it won't be taboo. I have no opinion on it being a true theory or not I just would like more discourse because there is a lot of research and evidence
pretty sure this was explained in at least three movies where the entire human race may or may not have survived but if the donut changes shape that would give some understanding maybe to why magnetic poles flip around sometimes
i had a theory probably a decade ago that supposed the magnetic field was caused by the core being a hollow cylinder magnet moving across the field lines of the suns own magnetic field, with the movement generating electric fields, in turn causing more magnetic fields to form. its wild to think a theory i had during second year engineering is turning out to have some potential. after watching some of the early microgravity experiments using water, alkaseltzer and tea leaves it made me wonder if this might even be a property of all planets formed by coalescing dust and debris. if the field is spinning there will be rotational forces counteracting the attraction of gravity meaning the center of that spinning cloud would have less density that the ring that would form where gravity and that rotational force of its spin would condense heavier elements. this all came about from pondering the hollow earth theory and its plausibility.
Hi Anton, may i ask what country you are from? have followed you for years, and been wondering :) thank you, you wonderful person, for making great interesting content! greetings from Denmark
Because of the gravitational force of the Moon that causes the Earth to take more of an elliptical shape as opposed to the spherical shape that we often see Earth represented as, could this tie into the explanation for why this 'donut' shape structure exists? Maybe because of the difference in distance to the core caused by this gravitational 'squeeze'?? (Please do not bite my head off, I am not a scientist or physicist and so my understanding of all of this is pretty primitive as is my lexicon of the correct terms to use... I'm just a casual layman with a curiosity is all. Have a great weekend!)
Couldn't these lighter elements simply be there because a magnet requires poles, and therefore, that they just happened to go against both poles, therefore ending up as a donut shape?
Convection donut 🎉 Within a sphere da Pacha Mama , so is it her belly hoop ? Like equatorial plane? Where is the hole axis, towards the poles? Interacts with rotation and magnetism undoubtedly, mind-blowing.
So, did the ''other'' planet merge with Earth, or do the other planet cover earth? Which planet was heavier, which lighter, or how did the merged forms of BOTH smaller planets not immerge consistently (By being fluidic, merging forms). Different heat's (That should have became similar over time) different compositions, internal flows or whatever?
Honest question. Given the metals of higher density, gold, tungston, lead etc., . Seems they would "settle" in a molten state, wouldn't the core have at least a high concentration of these metals?
There is no gravity in the core, so density does not matter all that much. Entropy probably plays a bigger role and it tends to disperse things around in an equal amount.
Dad, scientists said there is donuts under the ground.. Maggie, I'm going to get a shovel out of the garage and a duff beer from the fridge. I'll be with you Right away... duh
Mmmmm.... Donut... 🤤🤤🤤
Mmmmm, free goo
Mmmmm....Planetsized Donut homer voice 😂
Doh!
Mmmmm…burger
Sprinkles are a must have!
My son asked for that to be law
This new information helps to confirm how complex our planet really is. Certainly much more complex than it was thought to be when I started my amateur studies in geology 60 years ago. Plate tectonics was in its infancy back then. Who would ever have thought there is an inner-inner core? What a fascinating time to be alive! Arthur Holmes would be absolutely blown aware.
bruh its a donut inside the earth
So Journey to the Center of the Earth by Jules Verne was not a true story? 😒
@@johnbox271 No. But Verne's geological descriptions are wonderful and well within the geological knowledge of his time.
Wait a minute! I can understand how the Journey to the Center of the Earth might be a little farfetched, however, Jules Verne’s adventures he describes in one of his masterpiece’s, The Mysterious Island, was just a work of fiction?
There’s no way!
I mean after all the world is flat🤭😜 😂🤣, jk
Yes, Arthur Holmes's text was still being used ten years later; 50 years ago. I should know "Principles of Physical Geology".
So very interesting that modern seismic instruments can now measure our planets internal "harmonic resonances" is amazing! That fact that the differences in the resonance frequencies can now reveal hidden inner structures of our home planet is simply astounding!
They can't slice open the planet to see if they are right they don't even a damaged planet to look at to see if they are close. They have no way of checking to see if their instruments are making the correct readings, how do they know if the instrument is reading wrong. They have no way to check it.
@@charlestaylor3195just because you don't understand how they check it doesn't mean nobody does. Consider studying seismology before pretending you know it's all wrong
Indeed!
sounds like some hippy mumbo jumbo
Anton you inspire and uplift us viewers so so much. If you read this please just know you’re doing such amazing things and you are loved!
"Shaped like some kind of donut."
You can't leave us hanging like that... what kind of donut? Glazed... chocolate with rainbow sprinkles... that weird tractor wheel one... anything but Boston Cream....
We can probably rule out Bavarian Cream and Jelly as well... We're making progress.
Please be caramel
Don't you dare insult the Boston Cream, you filthy animal! 😆
I will not stand for this Boston cream slander
Maybe a kruller!
Hey Anton. Really glad you read refereed journals (and other of your sources) to disburse so much reliable information. What a breath of fresh air.
The graphics make it look like an actual simplified motor.
That in itself would explain the magnetoshere. 😊
what kind of motor?
@tsm688 a simple electric motor.
Iron core surrounded by another metal when spun creates a charge.
Not sure of any rate of rotation of course, just making an observation.
@@adrianjameSASbury that is not how a motor works...
@@adrianjameSASbury You described a generator. Electric motor is basically the inverse of that. You apply current to get it to turn.
@@SlowMonoxideI stand corrected, I was simply making an observation. 😜
Well that explains why Galactus is so keen to devour the Earth in particular.
??? Who is Galactus and should I be worried?
I just bought a house.
He's basically a life insurance agent but was an American cop previously.
So... we may have some kind of toroidal electromagnet in the Earth's outer core, the current possibly driven by an interaction between core convection and differentiation of 'metals' between the outer core 'proper' and said torus.
If such wild imaginings might be true, it would be interesting to try to model a differentiated terrestrial-type planet to see if this is something that might arise spontaneously or requires 'special' circumstances, such as being whacked by a 'Theia'.
Bullet into a coconut. I will have to rewatch Anton's two recent vids to confirm details, but to my memory at this time, he said results of studies put the Theia/moon deal in some doubt. I look at the donut like less dence detritus raising from the outer core like slag on my welding projects. Maybe the earth's spin pushing it out toward the equator to make it toroid.? I am a big fan of the Theia theory based on a proper cool mashup and lifegiving results basis. I hope I will follow the truth.
The very accurate time reference that has been available for a number of decades now makes detailed seismographic analysis, like this, possible.
Also: all these seismographs being connected to the Internet.
@@jamesphillips2285 the internet is a plus, but not mandatory. Precision timestamps are mandatory, for when it's time to crunch the numbers.
Although, tossing in light elements in a model, that gave me an instant headache. Hell, water even goes beyond ultraweird in the middle mantle, the rest aren't gonna behave any saner deeper and hotter.
Those Magratheans really know how to make custom planets don’t they 🤔😉😬
Gotta watch out for those extras thrown in to pad the bill. The mice got cheated.
I just made the same comment, you beat me by a couple day.
This channel and nature is so amazing! This pale blue dot not only includes everybody we’ve ever known but also a geodynamo that not only keeps us safe from the same thing that gives us life but also provides lightshows in doing so. Thanks for the daily reminder Anton!❤
Kind of gives credit to the Fermi paradox idea that we may be alone because it was an extreme sequence of Lucky events that allowed life to begin on this planet.
@@WayneBraack yeah the dynamo and maybe even stuff like plate tectonics is essential for life’s evolution, but as long as we only have ourselves as the only data point we can’t take the equation seriously. I think the biggest factors are the distances and in our case also the timescale. We were only sending out signals in the beginning of the electronics age and if we don’t unite as a people we won’e even move beyond Earth.
@@hurmzz It may also be necessary to host a relatively large moon, along with plate tectonics and the other Earth variables. Our Moon's effect on tides could have been necessary to mix ocean waters.
So cool. Thank you for sharing these discoveries!
Антоха красавчик, всегда в курсе последних новостей науки!
wonderful video as always, thank you!
I bet you if you were to plug in the Central point point around which the moon and the Earth rotate which is just under the surface along that donut path, you would see something pretty cool. For a long time I believed that the moon's orbit of the Earth is responsible for stirring our mantle because we rotate through that center It's the one thing that we have that's different from Venus and Venus doesn't have a magnetosphere
I can just see Homer Simpson's reaction now (rolls his head back and drools.) But, seriously, I'm also reminded of Mary Tyler Moore's (as Laura Petrie) joke on "The Dick Van Dyke Show"--the reason for going to the center of the earth is to find out whether it's chewy or chocolate cream.
Good one!
Always something interesting on this channel. Thank you so much, Anton.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 🤘🙃
Thanks!
Seems pretty consistent with known physics, if we have a molten core, then it seems to reason that nature is granular in nature, so a transitions from solid to molten should exist.
Great, now my wife's gonna know where I've been hiding the donuts. Thanks a lot, science.
it isnt consistent, not at thst depth and temperature, not for the length of time continents are thought to take to reach those depths
@@TS-jm7jm indeed, they've also established novel phases of ice within the mantle. So yeah, things get beyond weird with pressure and temperature.
I don't know of current models could even handle a belt of light elements being incorporated, they might need a complete re-write of the software!
I love your videos, I love even more that this video can be minimised. Does TH-cam decide which videos do that?
Forbidden donut we can never eat 😢
Galactus enters chat.
At least we have a moon made of cheese that we can one day consume...
I ate it
Chill out Homer!
Emm forbidden donuts 🤤
This kind of thing is the reason why I’m studying geology. I personally think that if there’s anything in science that seems very simple, it’s probably because we don’t know a whole lot about it. It’s very exciting to be going into a field of study that just had a major breakthrough and is having a ton of new discoveries made in it.
Wouldn’t this be a “napkin ring” shape?
Yup, colation, rotation and enthalpy are the primary functions to annalyse in all rotational bodies. Such dohnuts or (Shells) as my stuff predicts can be found in anything with a spin, mass and internal degrees of freedom. Nice Video Anton.. Cheers Mate..
Anton = GOAT
Interesting to know about this, thanks 👍❤
Seems reasonable that a spinning fluid would take more of a disc (donut) type shape.
@@craig7350 Yes but I would sort of expect the lines for the boundaries to extend radially from the center, not parallel to the equator. It's interesting.
Obviously a donut along the equator. Now think of atoms. Sure, Laguerre polynomials and spherical harmonics describe their clouds *perfectly*, but can there be a really deep & yet unseeable inner donut that determines the angular randomness?
@@GEMSofGOD_com Is there angular randomness to describe?
Kinda like that ride at the fair that spins fast an every Flys up against the wall lol
@@GEMSofGOD_com Was there an angular randomness that needs describing?
Thank You, Wonderful Anton 👍👍👍👍
It always drives me crazy when people say the core is "solid iron", while at the same time saying radioactive decay is what heats the earth. Like obviously the deepest part of the core is full of Uranium and other radioactive elements, just look at how much Uranium is in the Crust. It boggles my mind that this is never mentioned.
I assume pressure kept it solid.
Because the density doesn't match up. If it were uranium it would have shown in seismic data. On top of that uranium is not magnetic in any way
There's certainly a lot of uranium and other heavy metals down there, but its still mostly iron and some nickel
There are all manner of heavy elements inside the Earth, they just aren’t significant in quantity compared with iron and nickel.
@@StuffandThings_ well either the core is kept rotating and molten by its radioactive elements or, its only a result of the collision with thea and we are constantly cooling from in out. However i'd like to point out every element past iron is made in a supernova, or collision of neutron stars. And we had tons of heavier elements on earths crust, and more should be in middle then in our crust. Our whole solar system has been bombarded with elements from things we never seen.
I like how Antonio channel started as teaching us physics and math, now he does science news
Hiya Anton, thanks so much for your videos, they are all so well done and very interesting. When you have time, can you review the astronomical research on Planet 9 and what it could be made of? There was some interesting speculation recently, that it could be a 'dark matter' planet? Is this possible?
THe core of the other planet, Thea, would have been mixed in with the mantle as it impacted earth, and any angular momentum transferred into the molten core of Thea, from earth's rotation, would have caused the iron core of the other planet to precipitate down onto the core layers of the earth's existing core, and that would explain the "inner carbonaceous material" that you postulated could have evaporated from our core, could have been instead, collected from Thea, not from earth bubbling it up as you surmised at 6:21 into the video. Great work Anton, I love catching your daily videos and learning something new.
Brilliant segment Anton.Petrov, thanks for sharing utterly exciting information. Mankind progresses forwards and new horizons open. If only we could all learn to live in peace and cooperation heh?
Still, each tiny step towards a goal is a step closer.
Thanks for the vid upload.
Babe wake up. Anton said there are donuts in the Earth!!
😂
Why is your babe always sleeping?
@@28th_St_Airasking the more important questions 😂
There were discussions in science, 20 or 30 years ago, about the idea/hypothesis of a nuclear-georeactor at the inner most part of the Earth's core. It also appeared in a science magazine of that time; probably New Scientist or Scientific American. It was deemed to be responsible for the heat generated from the core. I did not hear any of these words used in recent videos from this Y.T. source. This information may prove useful for people with sufficient time to research such matters in more depth.
I read that article and found it very interesting. Surely there are radioactive elements down there decaying...
I think heat from nuclear decay is supposed to be the primary reason the inside of the earth is hot.
@@harrietharlow9929 about 50% of heat in the earth comes from radioactive decay, the other 50% is heat from the formation of the earth.
@@barryon8706 : That has been my understanding from decades ago and more recently.
Until you can slice open the earth, or even another planet, it's just guess work.
Love you Anton
Hmm. I thought we had evidence that our magnetic field has not always had stable poles. If the donut is there solely due to earth rotation I would imagine it has been that way through several variations on our magnetic field.
Hey there, i have been following you for some time.
I really appreciate the content that youve been working on, many thanks!
I just started playing the video, and ill keep watching.
I think youll want to research Richard C Hoagland ET Hyperdimensional physics.
The work of Stan Tenen from Meru Foundation is also super interesting, Geometric Metaphors of Life.
Everything is interconnected...
I think there might be some useful puzzlepieces for you in there.
Peace
If it is concave on the inside it should also possess a tensor field effect. That harmonic tension field produces frequencies which may account for gravity magnetism etc...
Near the core centre the pressure is very high but zero gravitational forces. If the core is spinning the centrifugal forces will effect heavier elements more creating a ring like structure. The same centrifugal principle is used to seperate uranium isotopes for enrichment. Because gravity is neutral at the core centre, all atoms are essentially weightless, so the idea that lighter elements would float is not relevant. They have different mass but are almost totally weightless.
Our magnetic field generator. In effect this permits life to develop and thrive here. Along with the Ozone layer life on land can be.
Thank you.
Crazy! Almost as if there weren't any secrets we could possibly have been a bit further along in scientific discoveries
The basic premise to create a magnetosphere, whether around a planet or a star, requires a fluid that experiences convection, conduction, and rotation. When these conditions are present, a dynamo will spontaneously develop. Any one of those conditions not satisfied, no magnetosphere. It's actually much better understood than Anton suggests.
I very much appreciate your videos. They say that you should ignore the comments. But, only ignore the ignorant haters who are fishing for a reaction I say. Otherwise, I say, pay attention. Because some folks will have valid critiques and others will have valid accolades. I, good sir, give you accolades. I appreciate your straightforward curiosity into piercing the veil of reality. Please, I mean this earnestly, keep it up. I need it.
Fascinating. I wonder if the movement of the outer core has anything to do with the position of this formation.
Fascinating Captain, Shields up and at maximum. She is a big space ship our wonderful Earth.
Earth is a cruel bitch that murders thousands of her crew everyday.
Hey @whatdamath I have a math problem: If i watched 3 of your videos every two days, given you upload a new video every day, how long would it take me to finish all of them?
Damn it's amazing what just having data enables with our modern intuition for physical bodies
Another piece of the puzzle to help us figure out why Mars and Venus don't have internal magnetic fields anymore, and yet Earth, Mercury and even Ganymede do.
Correct. Why claim anything until those questions are answered, because they play a vital and necessary part to their guess work. You have to have all the pieces to make the puzzle complete.
Makes sense, orbital movement isn't perfect so internal donut flow seems nice
Thank you
Gravitational imaging arrays using low cost but very sensitive gravitational sensors can use time of flight correlation to image regions anywhere inside the earth at high resolution. There are many desktop, even portable alternatives. Atomic clocks, gravity gradiometers, many kinds of gravimeters, some of the "quantum detectors" and more. Many groups can take advantage of multiple improvements in low noise amplifiers, ADCs, data engineering, machine learning and more. Plus better global sharing and integration of data from many source and very different types.
These are "speed of light and gravity" signals, not seismic. And they can track in near real time the seismic signal, and after the fact from recordings. So it gives an independent look at what is going on. Mapping the interior of the earth by temperature, density, pressure, and then by elements, isotopes and molecular species means better benchmarks and constraints on models of everything going on inside the earth. More aggressive three axis, real time, high sampling rate measure of the magnetic and gravitational fields will mean a complementary model to view and make sense of the seismic datasets.
Yes, the global open sharing of all geophysical, satellite, solar system, astrophysical, communication, and power system field data is happening and making it possible (by correlation and machine learning) to fill in the gaps, plan and very deliberately design new sensor arrays.
Filed as (Global networks of low cost, three axis, time of flight gravimeters and gradiometers for 3D imaging of the Earth, atmosphere and oceans)
Richard Collins The Internet Foundation
Looks more like a brass compression ring (sleeve fitting). Or a big belt.
Such a gentleman, thank you
Best channel on youtube!
Hmmm. Going out on a limb beyond my expertise here, but if the magnetosphere is necessary for life, necessary to protect life from solar radiation and so on, and if the donut is both fundamental to the generation of the magnetosphere and a relic of the remnant of the collision with Theia, then wouldn't such an event potentially be a truly massive bottleneck for the Drake Equation / Great Filter? In other words, if such an event was necessary to create the conditions that create us, wouldn't the wild improbability of a repeat mean perhaps we are alone after all?
Thank you sir 🙏
spiral shaped vortices with fluid iron passing between them seem not too dissimilar to coil and magnet in an electro motor
Loved it
Glaze or sprinkles?
This is the most informative channel on anything,I have my grand kids watch every post. We need more likes and subscribers!!❤❤❤🧑💻🧑🚀
Thx junior.
How can we possibly geo engineer this donut to possibly increase our fields strength, or should we leave it alone and go for a more topical type approach (upper-most atmosphere manipulation) to extend the range of our planets magnetosphere before it gets any lower. Yes, the breakdown of our field may be quite a ways out however if we wait till then it'll be to late if that makes sense.
If we look at magnetism via magnetohydrodynamics, it would be something of a consideration that the curl of the magnetic field, and the torque therein, on the locations perpendicular to poles of the magnetic field would wind up having different liquid-solid metal interface. So this curling force would cause different convection cells in a torus around the inner-core outer-core interface...
Probably.
Edit: TLDR, this one
GRAD cross B = Mu_0 (J + Ɛ_0 (partial derivative of E with respect to t)
Oh, so kind of like a centrifugal effect inside the planet slinging certain elements to the outside, forming a sort of donut
In regards to the innermost core, could there be a blackhole that has minimal enough mass to develop an accretion disk that wouldn't collapse and instead would continue to form a "shell" of sorts that could become a planet given enough time?
Its crazy how thin the crust we live on is. The volume of the core and the churning molten rock generating a manetic field that stops the life giving Sun from killing us is well beyond my comprehension 😄
Maybe the donut like structure influences Earth's space-time at the north and south pole? The Earth's poles experience time more slowly, and the rest of the donut latitudes proceed with much faster time since there is slightly more gravity. In theory, the polar ice caps of Earth (and Mars) are millions of years in the past relative to the equator. That is why they have large sheets of ice on them that existed millions of years ago along the Earth's ~more equatorial region during the ice age!?
I'm wondering if the Earth's rotation could be just an effect of spacetime and this donut.
The more they discover how truly complex our planet is the more I believe chances other planets have all this going for them to sustain intelligent life is very slim
This is a top ten Aton video 👍
Well, if the donut is essentially silicon dioxide if it were cooled down, that's an electrical insulator. Not sure if it still is in a molten state.
One of many proofs of earth being a donut shape
The coriolis effect would be applied to seismic waves too, right? Re the donut: is it possible it's a tidal effect from the moon? Does it line up with the moon's path? I'm assuming not.
If there are lower pressure pockets in the mantle and outer core, they'd mess with the state of matter there, right? Making the mantle molten and the outer core solid, maybe? Weird to think about. I wish I'd paid more attention during physics.
As mass shifts from the surface toward the core, the rotational velocity of the earth will increase, causing the calendar to increase by one part in 72 or 5 days.
These findings make me wonder about how this connects to the Rare Earth Hypothesis.
It's the shielding plates around Unicron's central reactor.
The chunks appear to line up with Africa, the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Not sure if there's a deeper relationship but I wouldn't be surprised if the chunks were having an influence on the crust.
I watched another astronomy related video recently, it mentioned inner cores of planets.. although clearly I didn't retain much information from the video though... 😆
So - question.. Is it true that Earth's inner core moves in an unusual or atypical way compared to other planets? Like, it spins slowly counter to what's expected? Is that because we were impacted by another proto-planet that broke off a chunk that became the moon?
The donut is a stator and the core is a rotor, thus creating our north and south poles 😶🌫️🤯
The earth is a generator
Inner and outer core are the windings
Motor windings*
Any thoughts on the increasingly popular idea of a cyclical 12000 year solar cycle that greatly impacts earth and causes major changes? Would love you to make a video talking about it whatever your opinion on the matter is!
Catastrophism is enough to get Anton shut down by his peers as they hate this fact and call us kooks.
They only accept that things happen very very slowly and Lord forbid any cyclical catastrophic timeline as it means they need to redo geology and lots of natural sciences.
Peers are punks.
Catastrophism is enough to get Anton shut down by his peers as they hate this fact and call us kooks.
They only accept that things happen very very slowly and Lord forbid any cyclical catastrophic timeline as it means they need to redo geology and lots of natural sciences.
Peers are punks.
I believe that's still heresy and asking Anton to talk about it risks his career.
@@jedahn😂
@@jedahn It's only bad for his career if it's true and he says it is true but if it is the truth it will come out faster the more people talk about it and soon it won't be taboo. I have no opinion on it being a true theory or not I just would like more discourse because there is a lot of research and evidence
Looks like centrifugal differentiation to me. Lighter materials are slowly thrown outwards to form the donut shape.
I've always wanted a red lava lamp only to find I'm living on one.
That's the magnetic torus surrounding the singularity at the center. :)
pretty sure this was explained in at least three movies where the entire human race may or may not have survived
but if the donut changes shape that would give some understanding maybe to why magnetic poles flip around sometimes
This is the first time I've seen anton smile
Donut earth believers are gonna go crazy over this
i had a theory probably a decade ago that supposed the magnetic field was caused by the core being a hollow cylinder magnet moving across the field lines of the suns own magnetic field, with the movement generating electric fields, in turn causing more magnetic fields to form. its wild to think a theory i had during second year engineering is turning out to have some potential. after watching some of the early microgravity experiments using water, alkaseltzer and tea leaves it made me wonder if this might even be a property of all planets formed by coalescing dust and debris. if the field is spinning there will be rotational forces counteracting the attraction of gravity meaning the center of that spinning cloud would have less density that the ring that would form where gravity and that rotational force of its spin would condense heavier elements. this all came about from pondering the hollow earth theory and its plausibility.
our own magnetic field is 65,000 times more powerful than the sun's at this distance. sorry
The location near benham rise of Philippine sea? The opening is the deepest sea in Marianas?
Hi Anton, may i ask what country you are from? have followed you for years, and been wondering :)
thank you, you wonderful person, for making great interesting content!
greetings from Denmark
He's Canadian
Because of the gravitational force of the Moon that causes the Earth to take more of an elliptical shape as opposed to the spherical shape that we often see Earth represented as, could this tie into the explanation for why this 'donut' shape structure exists? Maybe because of the difference in distance to the core caused by this gravitational 'squeeze'?? (Please do not bite my head off, I am not a scientist or physicist and so my understanding of all of this is pretty primitive as is my lexicon of the correct terms to use... I'm just a casual layman with a curiosity is all. Have a great weekend!)
Couldn't these lighter elements simply be there because a magnet requires poles, and therefore, that they just happened to go against both poles, therefore ending up as a donut shape?
Great, now my wife's gonna know where I've been hiding the donuts. Thanks a lot, science.
Convection donut 🎉
Within a sphere da
Pacha Mama , so is it her belly hoop ? Like equatorial plane? Where is the hole axis, towards the poles?
Interacts with rotation and magnetism undoubtedly, mind-blowing.
So, did the ''other'' planet merge with Earth, or do the other planet cover earth? Which planet was heavier, which lighter, or how did the merged forms of BOTH smaller planets not immerge consistently (By being fluidic, merging forms). Different heat's (That should have became similar over time) different compositions, internal flows or whatever?
The impact remelted the surface of the earth, resulting in a silicate rich crust
Honest question. Given the metals of higher density, gold, tungston, lead etc., . Seems they would "settle" in a molten state, wouldn't the core have at least a high concentration of these metals?
There is no gravity in the core, so density does not matter all that much. Entropy probably plays a bigger role and it tends to disperse things around in an equal amount.
@@OneLine122 appreciate the straight answer, thx
Dad, scientists said there is donuts under the ground..
Maggie, I'm going to get a shovel out of the garage and a duff beer from the fridge. I'll be with you Right away... duh
Earth is a very unique planet. Why am I not surprised !
All planets are unique, we just understand our own better. It's not even the most unique planet in the solar system, Saturn is.