Heidegger, The Eyes of the Gods

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @JohannesNiederhauser
    @JohannesNiederhauser  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Enrol here halkyonacademy.teachable.com/p/heidegger-on-being-and-death

  • @zacharycurrie3708
    @zacharycurrie3708 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm astonished to hear such a knowledgable discussion about Heidegger's thought on TH-cam! Thank you!

    • @JohannesNiederhauser
      @JohannesNiederhauser  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you very much indeed. There’s quite a bit more on Heidegger on my channel

  • @filipsmit5497
    @filipsmit5497 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This hit home. Johannes, you expanded language into the realms of bliss and in so doing shone light in my most intense and deepest felt experiences, rare and brief as they were. Thank you ~ Filip

  • @222bookwriter
    @222bookwriter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Made warm by the blood and flesh human being through deep insight, love, wisdom and intelligence. Hopefully. Just takes a time to get there through the wastelands of the meaning crisis.

  • @travisedwards8299
    @travisedwards8299 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful
    Greetings from Australia

  • @jantomiska
    @jantomiska 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really enjoyed this talk!

  • @davidshawver9303
    @davidshawver9303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent!

  • @doublenegation7923
    @doublenegation7923 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hello! I would like to know whether the course will touch on the temporal-spatial character of the ‘withdrawal’ of Beyng. (Heidegger claims, more than once, that the clearing of concealment is in fact the transporting-captivating of ‘Time-Space’.)

  • @Larrypint
    @Larrypint 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    In Heideggers Ontology method God wasn't a higher personified being. Gott, God, Goda comes from Indo-European persian roots "Chodā" Chod(self)/Chodā = "become self" but it goes beyond and behind the term "ego"
    It's still in the persian language as
    Chodā hāfiz and it means in his Etymological origin literally "find Self guard know by heart”. Islamic Sufi mysticism has this metaphysical meaning partially included in his teachings but in orthodox Islam it changed to " God protect you" and hafiz (guard or memorizer) became someone who knows the quran literally in Arabic word by word.
    Heidegger often used the term
    "Seinsverständnis" /"Being-Understanding"
    I recommend "being and time" a real masterpiece.
    "Language is the house of being. Man dwells in their dwelling. The thinkers are the guardians of this dwelling. Their waking is the accomplishment of the openness of being, insofar as they bring it to language through their saying and preserve it in language"
    So a specific language brings a specific excess to being.

  • @bennyharvey703
    @bennyharvey703 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lev Shestov he is very be

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 ปีที่แล้ว

    first, the complete loss ... then the repercussions of that ... and much later all tidings again may return

  • @amrelshafei206
    @amrelshafei206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why gods? Why not one indivisible God?

    • @JohannesNiederhauser
      @JohannesNiederhauser  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      God is dead

    • @amrelshafei206
      @amrelshafei206 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JohannesNiederhauser Nietzsche was talking about the Christian world. Perhaps it would be beneficial to get familiar with other views. For example, God is pretty alive in the Muslim world. I just wanted to raise this idea with you and I really appreciate and benefit from your work. You might like rene guenon's Crisis of the Modern World.

    • @JohannesNiederhauser
      @JohannesNiederhauser  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes and Heidegger stands in that same tradition. Simply to move to other views would amount to pastiche or kitsch. We do not live in a metaphysical supermarket where we can just browse for other viewpoints. That yields only more confusion as a result. In fact, other experiences of being can only open up to us if we are open to the truth of our own situation.

    • @amrelshafei206
      @amrelshafei206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JohannesNiederhauser I agree with you that the world unfolds starting from our own specific standpoint. But it isn't a metaphysical supermarket, it is the world as will and representation. It is the perspectivism of Nietzsche. We are all talking about the same thing, one elephant in the room. One ring to rule them all!! Guenon elaborates more on that.

    • @JohannesNiederhauser
      @JohannesNiederhauser  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nietzsche is not Schopenhauer.

  • @jpmisterioman
    @jpmisterioman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Debate Jay Dyer