the girl wasnt even looking she didnt know where her hand was and on top of that the standford girl was holding onto her arm so she couldnt move it anyway
so everybody gonna ignore the fact that both players had her arms locked turning away otay, brinks lucky they got in between you would have seen your first k.o. in womans basketball and brinks knew it just look at her on sidelines looking over scared and shook 😂
@@archsciontrismegistus4194 yeee, hollingshed after she got booted from the wnba, is now playing in Puerto Rico while brink is a millionaire and got drafted 2nd overall.
If I was Brink and watched film the next day, and saw that none of my teammates came to my defense and let the other team surround me, i would have been extremely pissed
Exactly. I watched this several times just to be sure that NO ONE from Stanford came to her support. No one…Not fight, but just pull her away or stand between or something!
Because the more players that get involved in a confrontation, even as "peacemakers," the more likely the officials decide to send a few to the showers. 1 or 2 teammates of 1 player trying to settle things down may be tolerated, but having 3 or 4 players from both teams getting into the fray exponentially increases the chances of the officials handing out multiple technicals & ejections.
NCAA rules are strict. Leaving the bench is an ejection. Confronting the other girls might have escalated it into a brawl. Stanford is just dominant, and other teams will get frustrated.
@@jazzyj6640 if you’re defending the Colorado player, you’re entitled to your wrong opinion. She got the ball stolen and tried to grab and push the other girls face like a thug.
@@danduran4981 no she didn't. You just don't like stanford. Whomever you're a fan of...standord owns them. Just cuz you wish she backed down doesn't mean she did. Lameo
Both were intentional. Both show poor sportsmanship. Neither action was part of the play so both should have been tossed. Just because a player does something foolish doesn't mean you get a pass to retaliate.
@@tysinKO What are you talking about? If someone got their dirty ass hand in my face for that long when I obviously got the ball from you, imma react the same way. That is disrespectful
@@qhosten I can slow it down for you. Both actions are fouls. I don't care how you would react while playing. Both actions ( hand in face and throwing the ball at another player) are poor sportsmanship as well. So I hope I was able to slow it down for you little buddy.
@@tysinKO nah throwing the ball was under reacting. She straight up was pushing her face for awhile and then shoved near the end. Throwing a basketball is no where near the same.
@@courtneyvaughn2334 it is the same. Both players assaulted each other. Both actions were not during the play. The ball would not have been in the other girls face if it wasnt thrown intentionally by the other girl. So yes both actions are assaults. Throwing the ball is more cowardly because she had ample opportunity to do the same hands to the face but she decided the ball should be used as a weapon.
Brink is also physically tougher than she appears to be. Look at the international game against Japan and China where she literally bodyslams her opponents without even trying
@@jazzyj6640 let's not pretend we don't know why this statement was made. Also note why Bruno's response was made. I can promise you neither care about women's basketball or any other kind of basketball.
For a minute there, it reminded of the face hugger from the movie Alien. Yes, that was a bit much of a reaction from Hollingshed for the tie up with Brink.
@@MooreCEJr She came in when things got heated but she clearly turned towards Brink after the ball was thrown. It's right there in slow motion and in real time.
Ii think Hollingshed should probably been tossed, because she initiated and would not stop (she even fouled Hull) and then the two Colorado players rushing on Brink was also a problem. Brink shouldn’t have retaliated, but what was her other option, especially when the other two players rushed her, it could have ended much worse. I’m glad that they didn’t kick Brink out, a double tech was probably to help diffuse the situation, which I think it did.
@@e-man5654 I’m glad that neither of them got tossed, that seems excessive. Two star players getting ejected during a conference tournament, especially since Hollingshed is a super senior, wouldn’t have served anyone. I think the refs did the right thing, the rest of the game was clean, and the dirty stuff that was occurring stopped, and the rest of the game wasn’t tainted by a bad call. Calmer heads prevailed.
Refs were more concerned with their ability to get another games paycheck than calling out an asshole as an asshole. Toss #21 and see how many more times she brings her tube on the court.
I'm with you, Amy. The shove in Brink's face was completely intentional and was an aggressive, non-basketball attack. Hollingshed should have been tossed and perhaps have been banned from the next game. This was a physical attack to the face/head of another player. Brink did nothing to deserve such an attack. Brink should receive a T, but honestly.....most every player on either team would have responded in the same way if not in an even more aggressive manner.
Instead of surrounding Brink and ganging up on her, they should’ve gone to Hollingshed to calm her down. It’s crazy how many don’t even try to help compose their teammates and instigate more problems onto the court. It’s just astounding.
Boy the refs got that wrong number 21 shoved her in the face hard almost knocking her to the ground and she shoved the other player in the back as well she should’ve been tossed iand somebody should’ve got free throw’s !🤣
If anything they both should have been tossed from the game. The palm to the face and throwing the ball at the player. Both of those things are electable offense. But they decided to keep both in the game.
Best replay is 1:52. #22 steals the ball from #21, causing #21’s right arm to land on #24’s right arm, which then goes into #21’s face, who then takes it out on #24 by putting her hand in her face, who then retaliates by throwing the ball.
Stinger296 You have the best observation in the comment section I have read. I agree, none of it was intentional. #21 from Co and #24 from Stanford had their eyes closed for most of it.
WHERE *TF* were Binks *teammates,* damn it. Binks didnt start this, yet the initial aggressor's teammates immediately jumped in, and hemmed Binks up, while Binks teammates stood idly by, from a distance. Again, WTF.
Honestly she deserved it and you got to let the opposition know you don’t play that shit. And glad #22 reacted letting them know that shit won’t fly. A face doesn’t feel anything like a ball.
It's a double tech. If you throw the ball at someone (no matter the circumstances), that's automatically a tech if not toss from the game. At the end of the day, they both did something so a double tech was issued.
I tend to agree with you, Ernest. Yeah, maybe Brink should not have retaliated, but when you are attacked like that, it's almost impossible to not react. In fact, if you don't react, you end up giving the dirty player a definite advantage. The dirty player has to receive a message, "Hey, we don't put up with that kind of crap. If you attack us, we give it back!"
@@e-man5654 Bull. The shove to the face was FAR more egregious than the ball to the shoulder from 8” away. 21 should’ve been out and they could’ve assessed MAYBE a personal foul to 22. These were officials who didn’t want to take a firm stand.
@@rkylebritt They don't measure how egregious the incidents are. The fact is they both did something. A personal foul is a basketball play. It's something that happens during the play. Any action taken place after the whistle has been blown will be at least a technical foul. Throwing the basketball at someone is not a basketball play neither is a shove in the face. That's why it's a double tech. To think otherwise is someone that doesn't know much about basketball. They took a stand by following the NCAA rule book.
@@e-man5654 You’re right on the distinction between PF, TF, and F1/2. I misspoke on that. I know plenty about basketball. Played for 20 years, been coaching for 15. Officials can and HAVE used the egregiousness of an action to assess the level of penalty. Let me rephrase to a more accurate penalty: yes, they are both “technical fouls.” The shove to the face should’ve received a double technical and ejection while the retaliation should’ve been assessed with a single technical foul. I’ve had players of mine in similar situations. Had a player (against me) fall to the ground in a scrum for the ball. One of my players grabbed his ankle and twisted it (quite intentionally, we have it on video and had to submit it for review from our conference). When this happened, the opposing player kind of kicked to get my player off. Our opponent (the “kicker”) was assessed a single technical for the kick and the “twister” (my guy) was assessed a double tech and ejection. The officials were right on top of it and explained why the fouls were similar, but different. We shot 2 technical free throws for the kick, they shot 4 for the double tech. Was it “by the book”? Guess not. Was it the right thing in my eyes? You bet. My player also sat a few games after this.
@@jakedineen2612 I think you are blind boy! The stanford player was backing up. She was surrounded by 3 Colorado players and would have gotten her you know what kicked.
Terrible call! They look at the video, they know what happened and still settle on blaming both of them! Outrageous! Hollingshed should have been ejected for such a dirty play. Not punishing that behavior encourages it. Shame on her and the cowardly referees.
Brink didn't even get supported from her teammates 😕... Colorado #1 player should have got tech for getting in Brink face...I'm pretty sure she saw her teammate facepalm Brink... neither fan of either team but basketball fan in general..
Come March Madness, if you follow Stanford, the saying goes "No More Stanford Nice Girls" meaning they'll get gritty and tough since the games mean more.
@@michaelwall2304 i don't care what u think or how you feel about it.🙄 I'm my own person and I stand for up for myself. I always have. I get kicked out of the game, OH WELL. Get some balls.
@@TV-ob1if You don't defend yourself by throwing ball at someone especially when there are already players in between them. Definitely not the way to go in any sports.
@@e-man5654 no physical altercation is advisable in basketball but when it’s time it’s time. Fk that chick from Colorado. She knows who she’s fkn wit now doesn’t she
The announcers need their heads examined. She did'nt know she was shoving her hand in the stanford players face ? really? DQ the one player and technical foul on the other. The stanford player had a right to protect herself.
Honestly, bad calls! Hollingshed physically assaulted palming her face and push off out of frustration, no elbows were given. Brink retaliated by throwing the ball. Without video a double tech is fine. With the video you can clearly see the aggression that triggered a retaliation (and honestly it could very likely have been a punch, that would have been understandable). With video referring Hollingshed out, Blink tech. Thus, bad call.
Brink is no pushover. Hollingshed is cocky and arrogant. Ive noticed that since they beat Stanford awhile ago. Noticed it again the night before they played Stanford this time. Good ball player but all that was not necessary. She has some maturing.to do. As for the heat...Dont judge a book by its cover. You just can't push everybody around. Point blank period. Its.not always what it looks like. Stanford has always been poised. But there's a hidden beast in the most innocent, with a weak appearance. We won't even go there.
This is a recurring theme in our society. These people are always violently attacking people that aren't them. That's why no one wants to live by them.
but yet shmooolie houses them and will make them wear a suit and tie and ask 'How High?' when you say 'Jump'...You have a bowler, a bowling ball, and ivory pins.
Based on this video alone, and not knowing if anything happened between Hollingshed and Brink beforehand, I have to say Hollingshed's style of play makes her a good fit for the WNBA.
The girl was pissed because Brink straight up embarrassed her by TAKING the ball like a boss! It's about right, can't control the ball or her emotions! She should have been an ejection! Next thing you know, Brink will be labeled a racist because she took the ball!
why does the person retaliating to a blatant foul get a foul called on them as well... you are allowed to throw the ball at people.. you can throw it at them as hard as you want.. if you lose your dribble, you can bounce the ball off the opposing players face if you want. If you're inbounding you can bounce it off the opposing player to bring the ball in.
Colorado whoever she is thinks she’s all of a sudden she’s a victim. GET OUT OF HERE! Dude DJing is distracting the crowd like crazy, “my baby ebony girl didn’t do nothing”.
Refs blew this call! Great steal by Brink. Then she clamps the arm and turns. Colorado player definite intentional foul.....Brink should have received Technical for throwing the ball. Free throws and the Stanford Ball out of bounds!
SHE DESERVED THAT, how you push someones face and expect them to not get mad smh
the girl wasnt even looking she didnt know where her hand was and on top of that the standford girl was holding onto her arm so she couldnt move it anyway
@@idek256 put your hand on your face does that feel like a foot what are you talking about.
@@idek256 fr anymore bs excuse 🤣 😒 I'm sure she didn't know her feet was on the ground either go sit in the conner with the dunce cap
@@idek256 oh she knew where she put her funky hand at
Not one elbow hit her
I love that she stood up for herself
Her teammates are a DISGRACE for not standing up for her
@@giffysstiffy8874giffytuckthat’s why I wrote what I did
Moment was not that serious. No fight as was broken up already.
I don’t blame her for throwing the ball, she held on to her face a long time.
100% that face hold was fully intentional
I give so much credit to Brinks for just throwing the basketball. I admit I may have of done worse in that situation.
so everybody gonna ignore the fact that both players had her arms locked turning away otay, brinks lucky they got in between you would have seen your first k.o. in womans basketball and brinks knew it just look at her on sidelines looking over scared and shook 😂
h😂
@@archsciontrismegistus4194 yeee, hollingshed after she got booted from the wnba, is now playing in Puerto Rico while brink is a millionaire and got drafted 2nd overall.
Her feelings was hurt because Brink was stronger than she looked..love her intensity.
She got her ball taken and got mad
I loveeee brink!!🤗🤗
No that is a crime. Bet if rolls reversed you would be the first screaming white privilege.
At first I thought Brink was at fault, but you don't put your hand one someone's face for 5 seconds and not expect them to retaliate.
You don't put hands on someone's face period without some kind of retaliation!😂 Colorado player was wrong for doing that!
@@kjburkley2367 accidents happen, keeping her hand there was intentional.
The ugly weaker one just felt embarrassed next to the beautiful, smarter stronger one. Let’s face it CU not exactly a ticket to the top in life
Stevens v Hollinshed = Beauty v Beast
She put her hand in Brinks face TWICE !
If I was Brink and watched film the next day, and saw that none of my teammates came to my defense and let the other team surround me, i would have been extremely pissed
exactly
Exactly. I watched this several times just to be sure that NO ONE from Stanford came to her support. No one…Not fight, but just pull her away or stand between or something!
100 💯. I would of bench 4 other players for not playing as a team!
Brink should have transferred the next day. NOBODY HAS HER BACK? Gone girl.
Because the more players that get involved in a confrontation, even as "peacemakers," the more likely the officials decide to send a few to the showers. 1 or 2 teammates of 1 player trying to settle things down may be tolerated, but having 3 or 4 players from both teams getting into the fray exponentially increases the chances of the officials handing out multiple technicals & ejections.
What's up with all the Stanford teammates just standing around? Don't let the other team surround your Teammate.
That’s what I was wondering…smh!!
Right! They didn't want any smoke. Smh. Who won?
NCAA rules are strict. Leaving the bench is an ejection. Confronting the other girls might have escalated it into a brawl.
Stanford is just dominant, and other teams will get frustrated.
They can’t swim.
They're women that's why.
Total intentional contact to the head. Unbelievable the Colorado player wasn’t tossed.
Black Lives Matter
Reparations. Lol
Cause she's black
Fairness=racism
colorado is a dirty team
They never play fair
Colorado player should've been tossed. That was way over the line.
She shouldn’t have.
Both players should be ejected
@@jazzyj6640 if you’re defending the Colorado player, you’re entitled to your wrong opinion. She got the ball stolen and tried to grab and push the other girls face like a thug.
@@carloszugzwang6267 you’re right. We are ALL entitled to our OWN opinion. Thank you 😊
She just raised that way, prbly without a daddy
This year's tournament is showing some of these young women's true colors.
Yes black
Blacktivity
i think a lot of people in brinks position would’ve thrown hands, props to her
Yup.
You're probably right, but it wouldn't hurt for the young ladies to learn a few boxing movies, just in case. Regards, Denis Berte' USMC
I would have 😩🤣
WELL PLAYED, Cameron Brink, VERY WELL PLAYED. Ya just can't take a hand to the face at this level and let it slide.
Been a fan of Brink but when she threw that ball and Hollingshed got in her face and she didn't back down, I became even more of a fan👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Yeah I kind of think she backed down or at least backed away.
@@danduran4981 no she didn't. You just don't like stanford. Whomever you're a fan of...standord owns them. Just cuz you wish she backed down doesn't mean she did. Lameo
Too bad the ball didnt hit the face tho 🤣
White lives matter!
Coon
I'm glad she stood up for herself
Hands to the face automatically ejection. Throwing the ball at someone was a reaction should be a technical foul but hands to face was intentional.
Both were intentional. Both show poor sportsmanship. Neither action was part of the play so both should have been tossed. Just because a player does something foolish doesn't mean you get a pass to retaliate.
@@tysinKO What are you talking about? If someone got their dirty ass hand in my face for that long when I obviously got the ball from you, imma react the same way. That is disrespectful
@@qhosten I can slow it down for you. Both actions are fouls. I don't care how you would react while playing. Both actions ( hand in face and throwing the ball at another player) are poor sportsmanship as well. So I hope I was able to slow it down for you little buddy.
@@tysinKO nah throwing the ball was under reacting. She straight up was pushing her face for awhile and then shoved near the end. Throwing a basketball is no where near the same.
@@courtneyvaughn2334 it is the same. Both players assaulted each other. Both actions were not during the play. The ball would not have been in the other girls face if it wasnt thrown intentionally by the other girl. So yes both actions are assaults. Throwing the ball is more cowardly because she had ample opportunity to do the same hands to the face but she decided the ball should be used as a weapon.
Way to stand up for yourself! You can't let someone disrespect you like that.
Brink need some new teammates nobody ran up for her
That part!
You could either say that or that they are highly disciplined. But if it was me I'd want my team backing me regardless.
You play ball as a team and fight harder for your team mates!!!!!
They’re chicks. They don’t understand honor
This is Stanford.
Brink said don't let the braids and the baby face fool you lol
The Vikings were using braids long before it became popular. 😉
Brink is also physically tougher than she appears to be. Look at the international game against Japan and China where she literally bodyslams her opponents without even trying
Angel Face, Ms. Brink is not a push over... she is not a skinny white girl... but tough and has played enough biggs to handle her self!!!!
Wait, what does skinny white girl have to do with anything? I hope you’re not insinuating that white, skinny girls are push overs. 🤔
@@jazzyj6640 I hope ur not actually bothered by some youtube comment supporting a woman baller.
@@jazzyj6640 let's not pretend we don't know why this statement was made. Also note why Bruno's response was made. I can promise you neither care about women's basketball or any other kind of basketball.
@jaay teee if you don't know its because you choose to not know. Ask Brunofc why he called her Angelface.
@@thegoat6325 why you mad bout some shit from 4 months ago? gomd
For a minute there, it reminded of the face hugger from the movie Alien. Yes, that was a bit much of a reaction from Hollingshed for the tie up with Brink.
#1 on Colorado really gon act like her teammate did nothing wrong! 🤡🤡
I didn't see it that way. Seems like she tried to be a barrier between the two once Brink threw the ball.
@@Tigerkem You're funny. You can't be a barrier after the effect... she was jumping in the fray along with the other Colorado player.
@@MooreCEJr She came in when things got heated but she clearly turned towards Brink after the ball was thrown. It's right there in slow motion and in real time.
You don't put your hands in someone's face and get no reactions.... brink has a right to defend herself...
She was being a barrier. Watch the entire video
Those “fouls” were anything but equal. 21 should’ve watched the rest of the game from the bus.
Ii think Hollingshed should probably been tossed, because she initiated and would not stop (she even fouled Hull) and then the two Colorado players rushing on Brink was also a problem. Brink shouldn’t have retaliated, but what was her other option, especially when the other two players rushed her, it could have ended much worse. I’m glad that they didn’t kick Brink out, a double tech was probably to help diffuse the situation, which I think it did.
They both should have been tossed if anything. But they have a double tech. In most instances, throwing the ball at someone would get you tossed.
@@e-man5654 I’m glad that neither of them got tossed, that seems excessive. Two star players getting ejected during a conference tournament, especially since Hollingshed is a super senior, wouldn’t have served anyone. I think the refs did the right thing, the rest of the game was clean, and the dirty stuff that was occurring stopped, and the rest of the game wasn’t tainted by a bad call. Calmer heads prevailed.
Refs were more concerned with their ability to get another games paycheck than calling out an asshole as an asshole. Toss #21 and see how many more times she brings her tube on the court.
I'm with you, Amy. The shove in Brink's face was completely intentional and was an aggressive, non-basketball attack.
Hollingshed should have been tossed and perhaps have been banned from the next game. This was a physical attack to the face/head of another player. Brink did nothing to deserve such an attack.
Brink should receive a T, but honestly.....most every player on either team would have responded in the same way if not in an even more aggressive manner.
@@pteddie6965 they both should have been ejected! No suspension for that.
Glad 22 stuck up for herself. 21 thought she would just take it. She was wrong
She had every right to be upset when that girl hit her in the face. Don't hit someone then expect them not to get mad
Hollingshed needs to check herself. Way out of line.
If anything, they would have toss both of them.
How she was mugged if this was on the streets that's agrevatted assault
@@javontedonuts1034 wrong
Instead of surrounding Brink and ganging up on her, they should’ve gone to Hollingshed to calm her down. It’s crazy how many don’t even try to help compose their teammates and instigate more problems onto the court. It’s just astounding.
Boy the refs got that wrong number 21 shoved her in the face hard almost knocking her to the ground and she shoved the other player in the back as well she should’ve been tossed iand somebody should’ve got free throw’s !🤣
If anything they both should have been tossed from the game. The palm to the face and throwing the ball at the player. Both of those things are electable offense. But they decided to keep both in the game.
I'm blind, I'm def, I wants be a ref!
Good on 22 for wanting all of the smoke as a face palm has no place on the court🙌🏾
Was it not looked over correctly? That's a F2/disqualifying, it's an aggressive intentional non-ball play
We don’t have any decent zebras, they are all doodoo…
3 blind mice at all times in the Pac12
Best replay is 1:52. #22 steals the ball from #21, causing #21’s right arm to land on #24’s right arm, which then goes into #21’s face, who then takes it out on #24 by putting her hand in her face, who then retaliates by throwing the ball.
Stinger296 You have the best observation in the comment section I have read. I agree, none of it was intentional. #21 from Co and #24 from Stanford had their eyes closed for most of it.
WHERE *TF* were Binks *teammates,* damn it.
Binks didnt start this, yet the initial aggressor's teammates immediately jumped in, and hemmed Binks up, while Binks teammates stood idly by, from a distance. Again, WTF.
Honestly she deserved it and you got to let the opposition know you don’t play that shit. And glad #22 reacted letting them know that shit won’t fly. A face doesn’t feel anything like a ball.
Yeah, Green overreacted and actually was the flagrant. White reacted appropriately. To me, no double tech. Tech on Green only.
It's a double tech. If you throw the ball at someone (no matter the circumstances), that's automatically a tech if not toss from the game. At the end of the day, they both did something so a double tech was issued.
I tend to agree with you, Ernest. Yeah, maybe Brink should not have retaliated, but when you are attacked like that, it's almost impossible to not react. In fact, if you don't react, you end up giving the dirty player a definite advantage. The dirty player has to receive a message, "Hey, we don't put up with that kind of crap. If you attack us, we give it back!"
@@e-man5654 Bull. The shove to the face was FAR more egregious than the ball to the shoulder from 8” away. 21 should’ve been out and they could’ve assessed MAYBE a personal foul to 22. These were officials who didn’t want to take a firm stand.
@@rkylebritt They don't measure how egregious the incidents are. The fact is they both did something. A personal foul is a basketball play. It's something that happens during the play. Any action taken place after the whistle has been blown will be at least a technical foul. Throwing the basketball at someone is not a basketball play neither is a shove in the face. That's why it's a double tech. To think otherwise is someone that doesn't know much about basketball. They took a stand by following the NCAA rule book.
@@e-man5654 You’re right on the distinction between PF, TF, and F1/2. I misspoke on that.
I know plenty about basketball. Played for 20 years, been coaching for 15. Officials can and HAVE used the egregiousness of an action to assess the level of penalty.
Let me rephrase to a more accurate penalty: yes, they are both “technical fouls.” The shove to the face should’ve received a double technical and ejection while the retaliation should’ve been assessed with a single technical foul.
I’ve had players of mine in similar situations. Had a player (against me) fall to the ground in a scrum for the ball. One of my players grabbed his ankle and twisted it (quite intentionally, we have it on video and had to submit it for review from our conference). When this happened, the opposing player kind of kicked to get my player off. Our opponent (the “kicker”) was assessed a single technical for the kick and the “twister” (my guy) was assessed a double tech and ejection. The officials were right on top of it and explained why the fouls were similar, but different. We shot 2 technical free throws for the kick, they shot 4 for the double tech.
Was it “by the book”? Guess not. Was it the right thing in my eyes? You bet. My player also sat a few games after this.
Cameron was ready to take them all at once 😂😂😂
No she wasn’t, did you watch the same video/game? 😂 She wasn’t ready or about that action 😂
@@TheReddee1987 what’s sad her teammates didn’t even step up for, but them Colorado girls were right there.
@@TheReddee1987 boy you blind? She stood her ground to all those clowns. If her team would of had her back she Colorado would of taken 2 Ls in one day
@@jakedineen2612 I think you are blind boy! The stanford player was backing up. She was surrounded by 3 Colorado players and would have gotten her you know what kicked.
@@danduran4981 ok. I won't argue with someone with special needs. My parents raised me better.
Love the toughness! Great double down too!
Terrible call! They look at the video, they know what happened and still settle on blaming both of them! Outrageous! Hollingshed should have been ejected for such a dirty play. Not punishing that behavior encourages it. Shame on her and the cowardly referees.
On a positive note: No wigs or weaves were snatched.
"We don't want to see that????"
Honey, that was the most exciting part of the game.
This is basketball, not MMA.
Grow up - its basketball not prison ball
Brink is a baddie can't wait to see her in the WNBA. 👍
Bad call, it should've been flagrant foul on Hollingshed for retaliation. Can't believe the Refs missed that, which was pretty obvious on replay.
it was camerons fault so they got it right
@@ryanciani3324 no it wasn't clueless kid,, and colorado is a dirty team
yes it was. watch again
I don't know about anyone else but I'm digging the musical interlude interlude background!!🎵🎵🎶
how is the Colorado player gonna come up to Brink like that knowing it's their teammate's fault clowns those two
They were absolute clowns.
Tribal mentality
Chick was lucky Brink didn’t throw it right at her face.
Brink didn't even get supported from her teammates 😕... Colorado #1 player should have got tech for getting in Brink face...I'm pretty sure she saw her teammate facepalm Brink... neither fan of either team but basketball fan in general..
I agree. That's what surprised me too. In any sport teammates usually get close and try to take up for each other.😊
Let's just call it what it is..... she was mad that Brink stole the ball from her (without foul) and she threw a tantrum in her anger :P
I didn't think Brink would do anything like this. Wow Stanford has some guts after all.🤗
Come March Madness, if you follow Stanford, the saying goes "No More Stanford Nice Girls" meaning they'll get gritty and tough since the games mean more.
Just because they are polite and have SATs that b*itch slap Colorado and many other big basketball schools, doesn’t mean they don’t have guts
Kind off surprising that the women's basketball has more physical violence than the men's.
She literally facepalmed her.. Human Instinct..retaliate. I would have done the exact same thing fuck the game.
Then you should get kicked out of “the game”
@@michaelwall2304 i don't care what u think or how you feel about it.🙄 I'm my own person and I stand for up for myself. I always have. I get kicked out of the game, OH WELL. Get some balls.
@@michaelwall2304 yea okay mIchAeL🤡
Then both should have been kicked out of the game, not just the retaliation.
Biggest pet peeve is when my own teammates don’t stick up for me and don’t help.
Brink said, I see you’ve chosen death!
Dirty on 21's part
#21, that was a whole lotta steppin up to the plate only to find no body is holding you back so the brakes got applied pretty quickly. LOL
Number 21 should have been ejected from the game.
So should Brink for throwing the ball at someone. Throwing the ball at someone is never acceptable no matter the situation.
@@e-man5654 sure it is to defend yourself. 21 ejected. Brink play on 👍🏽
@@TV-ob1if You don't defend yourself by throwing ball at someone especially when there are already players in between them. Definitely not the way to go in any sports.
@@e-man5654 no physical altercation is advisable in basketball but when it’s time it’s time. Fk that chick from Colorado. She knows who she’s fkn wit now doesn’t she
@@e-man5654she got good aims
Skank acted like she didn’t claw machine 22’s face
Hollingshed should get a free ride in an elevator with Ray Rice for that move.
The announcers need their heads examined. She did'nt know she was shoving her hand in the stanford players face ? really? DQ the one player and technical foul on the other. The stanford player had a right to protect herself.
Let's go Brink! ❤
She got injured 😢
Honestly, bad calls!
Hollingshed physically assaulted palming her face and push off out of frustration, no elbows were given.
Brink retaliated by throwing the ball.
Without video a double tech is fine.
With the video you can clearly see the aggression that triggered a retaliation (and honestly it could very likely have been a punch, that would have been understandable).
With video referring Hollingshed out, Blink tech. Thus, bad call.
She pushed her in the face TWICE. Not an accident.
Hollingshet should play for Juwan Howard or that psycho women's coach at LSU.
21's starting shit and still mad at a retaliation😂🤣😭
That call sucked.
Super Cauc not taking any crap from that hoodlum - keep standing up - be proud of who and what you are !!!
😂STFU Dude. She wouldn't give you the time of day!
I want a malice at the palace with women. If every wnba game ended that way I would be a season ticket holder.
LOL! You sound like Don King!
hellingshid is TERRIBLE. She held on to and pushed Cameron's face. Pathetic...
Nobody on Stanford bout that action😂
No, they're about sending folks home. Colorado got that ass beat.
@@nottoomuch87 for the third time this season too!
Brink is no pushover. Hollingshed is cocky and arrogant. Ive noticed that since they beat Stanford awhile ago. Noticed it again the night before they played Stanford this time. Good ball player but all that was not necessary. She has some maturing.to do. As for the heat...Dont judge a book by its cover. You just can't push everybody around. Point blank period. Its.not always what it looks like. Stanford has always been poised. But there's a hidden beast in the most innocent, with a weak appearance. We won't even go there.
no cause they winning
Neither are u typing on youtube🙄🙄🙄
Good for Brink. Didn't let UC player get away with it.
She had every right to throw that ball,dude was asking for a flagrant two,not a bb play at all.
GOTTA PROTECT THE PRIVILEGED BASKETBALL IS ALL THEY HAVE .
Awful officiating
The music while they waited 😂
Caitlin Clark is the greatest college womens basketball player EVER 🇺🇲
Maybe Hollingshed will learn how to play basketball one day.
lol at the face diapers 🤣🤣
brink goated
This is a recurring theme in our society. These people are always violently attacking people that aren't them. That's why no one wants to live by them.
but yet shmooolie houses them and will make them wear a suit and tie and ask 'How High?' when you say 'Jump'...You have a bowler, a bowling ball, and ivory pins.
African is jealous of Brink’s skills and beauty
Yep. She is a bitter black woman
Fake skills, Brinks boyfriend is black. 😂
@@kendellellington3010nope the dude who sexually assaulted her was though.
Who would have thought women's basketball was so much better to watch... the passion and intensity!!
Not a brink fan, but that retaliatory ball toss should have been to the face.
Based on this video alone, and not knowing if anything happened between Hollingshed and Brink beforehand, I have to say Hollingshed's style of play makes her a good fit for the WNBA.
The girl was pissed because Brink straight up embarrassed her by TAKING the ball like a boss! It's about right, can't control the ball or her emotions! She should have been an ejection! Next thing you know, Brink will be labeled a racist because she took the ball!
Larry Bird vs Bill Lambeer moment
Looked like a clean play until the hand to the face.
T flagrant...ejection
why does the person retaliating to a blatant foul get a foul called on them as well... you are allowed to throw the ball at people.. you can throw it at them as hard as you want.. if you lose your dribble, you can bounce the ball off the opposing players face if you want. If you're inbounding you can bounce it off the opposing player to bring the ball in.
Colorado pulled the same violence when Iowa beat them in the Elite 8.
Brink is my favorite out of all the rookies!! She will be one of the best!! Calling it now!!
2 wrongs don't make a right
Brink ain't gonna let shyt ride.
Check out the score 14-10 almost half way into the 2nd quarter. Thrilling 🙄
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
hollingshed just mad brink ripped that ball off her with authority
If the foul wasn't called on palm to the face . The refs didn't care . If the refs don't protect you. Then protect yourself.
Colorado whoever she is thinks she’s all of a sudden she’s a victim. GET OUT OF HERE!
Dude DJing is distracting the crowd like crazy, “my baby ebony girl didn’t do nothing”.
Her conduct was out of control....the whole team should've been DISQUALIFIED....
"Are you talking to me?"
"Considering the fact that I just fired the ball at you, yeah, I am talking to you."
"You dont wanna see that" I clicked on the video just for that.
Good for brink.
Brink took the ball fair and square. A great basketball play a steal.
Chicken shit call, #21 should have been sent to the showers.
Refs blew this call! Great steal by Brink. Then she clamps the arm and turns. Colorado player definite intentional foul.....Brink should have received Technical for throwing the ball. Free throws and the Stanford Ball out of bounds!