HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Can't wait to drive mine when it gets here! Seen all the reviews there are on TH-cam on the XC60 and Kudos to you Volvo to improving this car year after year addressing issues!
Design is making great now. When making a car, design, performance, and durability to avoid breakdowns are the most important things. I hope to become number 1 among car brands.
Beautifully designed. Really like the 360 degree camera. Also the connected feature to let other Volvo drivers know of driving conditions ahead amazing. 👍🏻
I have my D4 R-Design since three years now and am about to release a new order for the ’22 Inscription T6 Recharge. This is the first car I will be buying twice 😋 Well done Volvo...
@@mwh.0074 It doesn't work that way. No one will give you nothing. You need to work like a slave until you have money to buy one. Maybe in 25 years or so you'll have one. So start now, from today on and save every penny you can. Good luck.
@@VolvoCars HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Very nice looking car. I liked the presentation and the way she is naturally interacting with the car. The only thing that threw me a bit off is when she was demoing the google assistant interaction is obvious that something didn't went well with the continuous flow of the video (maybe google assistant didn't understand the command ?). It's visible from the inconsistency of the time displayed on the dashboard. It jumped from 11:24 back to 11:22 and then forward again.
Any chance of reintroducing the XC70? I have two and can’t break myself in selling the older one. It’s a 2012, and the other is a 2015.5. Best car ever.
Volvo the best feature I like the most is the feature which is on the side view mirrors GREAT JOB Volvo, Love your creativity : ) and I am waiting for an XC90 fully hybrid : ) for my family
I own the previous generation. It's a very good car and i'm glad to see 30% more EV range and the Google UI in this upgrade but please make it a BEV soon and give it at least 400km range (EPA, not WLTP). This would be the ultimate car and you would have my money for an update.
Why lose the exhaust tips in the rear bumper on the 2022 , the design was spot on at the rear they look fabulous on the road and on our driveway lol , but this new rear bumper just lacks something
@@Darren_Nicola i have the T8, for me i like it because it's a sleeper car. 420 horses in a socker mum car. Having hidden pipes would just make it perfect. But it's a matter of taste of course.
@@experimental_av has that one got the chrome tips , I just like the look , I get what you are saying , I think once we all go electric I will soon forget the exhausts 😉
@@Darren_Nicola yeah it got the chrome bits around the exhausts. Maybe I dislike the look a bit because everyone nowadays has aftermarket bumpers with fake double exhausts
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Hi Graeme, the global industry is impacted by the shortage of semiconductors. Unfortunately, the semiconductor situation is very volatile and can cause delays. Please stay in contact with your local Volvo retailer for the latest updates.
Hello, we are glad to hear that you are interested in our hybrid cars! Feel free to read more about our plug-in hybrids and mild hybrids here: www.volvocars.com/intl.
I'd like to know if Volvo will offer an upgradable version? For example, in 8 years, when battery technology will improve, will we be able to just upgrade the battery pack? Get more autonomy by just upgrading the battery? Isn't it the main reasons for "ecological" cars?? Buy less... Buy longer... buy better??? I currently have a Ford C-Max Energi 2013. To battery pack is at 15% of what it was. The car still is in great condition, but.... I don't have anymore electric autonomy... And I can't even upgrade the battery pack!!
No doubt a beautiful mid sized Plug in Hybrid SUV. I had actually planned on a test drive of this very vehicle tomorrow. However the cost of it is simply too much. I really do like the features and the powerful engine along with the Hybrid system which gives it plenty of power. I simply can't see spending over $60k on it.
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Now we have to talk to Google like to our friend? "Hey google, can you switch yourself OFF?" )) I drive Volvo (XC90), I love it, but I don't like when computers decide what I have to do )
It’s a smart car where you have to swipe left and right to switch between changing FM station and then swiping back to see which station you’re on. UI design failure.
I'm in a Volvo family and I love our Volvo but every Volvo owner with the automatic boot lid knows that the foot opening really couldn't have been done in one take. Never works on the first try
I want to tell you to fix the shortcomings if you want a real car brand to become number 1. If so, then the old days are better. When everything is perfect, you can sell the car, but most cars have too many minor breakdowns. The car that made it perfect will be number one. Any brand should keep this. It may not just go into the future. I have to go back to the past and start from the beginning You may. It is certain that the gear rod is better than the button type. Electricity is better when the car door is opened, but the car key is better when the power is turned off. Electricity is better only when the door is opened
Mind blowing that you still continue making these fossil cars presented as something green. STOP! Power from braking back into the 48V battery? You would need a 400V system to recuperate all the energy from breaking. You might do 10% with this car.
Well a nice car without GPS because the system from Google is not working, you can not set to use even your data and of course there is no Apple Car or Android Auto... My recommendation, look for another car or wait, because we are buying cars that they don't work
They stopped development of their combustion engines several years ago. Battery electric is taking over because they are more efficient, silent, low to no service, stronger (no need of a gear box). And range is increasing as prices are falling so we will soon be at breaking point where BEVs are cheaper to produce. There is no turning back.
Got to watch a lot of XC 60 Model Year 2022 owner review videos .. seems like, Volvo has removed Drive mode selection wheel, removed Pilot Assist invocation from the steering, Four Zone Climate control not working if the front AC vents are not working, Music controls on the steering wheel not able to stop / pause the music ... these are some of the know issues !! Truley disappointed. Why on earth Volvo release such a buggy product to market ?
Obviously you don’t know that the creation and disposal of all of those batteries is more harmful to the environment than just a gas engine. Ty Vulvo for not KARENg about our environment…
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too. 1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries : if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object). The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications. (Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times). 4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries : The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2. But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments. Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : 4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses. Conclusion : Equal. 4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy) Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%. Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%. Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio. 4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy) Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Conclusion : Equal. 4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process : Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small. Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH. That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages 4.5/ Lifespan : Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span. Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.6/ Influence of environment temperature : Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures. Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.7/ Charging time : Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes. But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. 4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules : Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy. But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy. Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win. FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS. Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Wait there’s not lot of space .. rear seats are not adjustable plus no worth to spend $80000 , understand the safety but literally no worth to spend this much. I was very excited to drive this car but when I figured out that the rear space is not enough to sit and even not adjustable though. Please improve this features rather than giving worthless ones.. no hate but i am very disappointed 😢
all modern Volvo cars is beautiful :)
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Best automobile marketing informational video I've seen yet. Love the spokesperson, lighting and camera work. Excellent work.
The improvment of the built-in smart system is amazing! Would get my own Volvo car in the future. Love Volvo♥
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Great presentation- very Volvo. Telling us the things we actually want to know! Would love to see more presentations with this host
Can't wait to drive mine when it gets here! Seen all the reviews there are on TH-cam on the XC60 and Kudos to you Volvo to improving this car year after year addressing issues!
Hi Christopher, congratulations on your new XC60 when it arrives!
Love your accent and volvo 😍
Fabuloso Volvo ❤😮
Thank you! What Volvo XC60 feature is your favourite? /Millie
The music at the end is awesome!
Most important thing, 3:33 : yes you can fit a cameraman in the trunk, and close it, it fits.
Woww.. What a SUV it is 😘.
I’m glad to work for Volvo Cars (India)
Your blessed I wish I can work for volvo
I'm glad you have jobs too
Design is making great now. When making a car, design, performance, and durability to avoid breakdowns are the most important things. I hope to become number 1 among car brands.
Wonderful 😍
You gave us the infomations we needed to hear. Tanhks a lot!
Beautifully designed. Really like the 360 degree camera. Also the connected feature to let other Volvo drivers know of driving conditions ahead amazing. 👍🏻
We are glad to hear that you like it!
Truly impressive - so very proud to be an investor in Volvo.
fantastic presentation, I would like to have a job like you have :) Volvo ❤
Awaiting for this car in india 😘
Beutifull new color, Looks realy good on the Polestar Engineered
its gonna be fast on Polestar Engineered
I have my D4 R-Design since three years now and am about to release a new order for the ’22 Inscription T6 Recharge. This is the first car I will be buying twice 😋
Well done Volvo...
We are happy to hear this, Alexander! Congratulations on the new car when it arrives.
Volvo for Life 🙏❤️👍 thanks for you 💪💪💪 your the wonderful and beautiful family 😍😍😍😍🤩
Thank you for your support!
Amazing! My dream is all about Volvo. Hope I’ll get one in my life🤩
We are glad to hear that you are a Volvo fan and hope you join the Volvo family one day!
@@VolvoCars I surely will!!! But why don’t you guys give a giveaway?😃
@@mwh.0074 It doesn't work that way. No one will give you nothing.
You need to work like a slave until you have money to buy one. Maybe in 25 years or so you'll have one. So start now, from today on and save every penny you can. Good luck.
@@VolvoCars HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Very nice looking car. I liked the presentation and the way she is naturally interacting with the car. The only thing that threw me a bit off is when she was demoing the google assistant interaction is obvious that something didn't went well with the continuous flow of the video (maybe google assistant didn't understand the command ?). It's visible from the inconsistency of the time displayed on the dashboard. It jumped from 11:24 back to 11:22 and then forward again.
Any chance of reintroducing the XC70? I have two and can’t break myself in selling the older one. It’s a 2012, and the other is a 2015.5. Best car ever.
Go Go Volvo! Number 1 safety brand car! Volvo cars are great! Good luck! All the best dear Volvo!
We appreciate your support!
FAAAAABBBUUULLOOUUSSS presentation Volvo
I was just saying how Volvo should have a move-up warning like Subaru and here you are doing it. #ilovevolvo
Let’s see 2022 xc90, seeing how xc60 is done that’d be most likely my next car.
Volvo the best feature I like the most is the feature which is on the side view mirrors GREAT JOB Volvo, Love your creativity : ) and I am waiting for an XC90 fully hybrid : ) for my family
Beautiful car, wonderful 😀
Beauty to watch waiting to buy as it launches in INDIA
I own the previous generation. It's a very good car and i'm glad to see 30% more EV range and the Google UI in this upgrade but please make it a BEV soon and give it at least 400km range (EPA, not WLTP). This would be the ultimate car and you would have my money for an update.
Why lose the exhaust tips in the rear bumper on the 2022 , the design was spot on at the rear they look fabulous on the road and on our driveway lol , but this new rear bumper just lacks something
Wow i didn't notice. Now i like it even more :)
@@experimental_av if you own one you would definitely know it looks rubbish without them 🙂
@@Darren_Nicola i have the T8, for me i like it because it's a sleeper car. 420 horses in a socker mum car. Having hidden pipes would just make it perfect. But it's a matter of taste of course.
@@experimental_av has that one got the chrome tips , I just like the look , I get what you are saying , I think once we all go electric I will soon forget the exhausts 😉
@@Darren_Nicola yeah it got the chrome bits around the exhausts. Maybe I dislike the look a bit because everyone nowadays has aftermarket bumpers with fake double exhausts
Will this new UI be available as an update to existing Volvos? I have a 2021 xc40
Hi Adam, the new Android-based system can unfortunately not be retrofitted to existing models.
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
I have ordered a B5 petrol. Will get it in July 🥰
Hi Danne, congratulations on the new car when it arrives!
thank you very much.It's my fifth factory new volvo.Located in the family my uncle had 45 factory new volvo and his son about 25 .❤️
i have had my new xc60 my22 for 2 days.which car loves it.😍🥰😘😇
I have the Inscription XC60 and I love my Volvo
We are glad to hear that you are enjoying your XC60!
Nice looking car 👍👋🇬🇧
Your welcome
Be great if you could actually get one! Ordered one in march for delivery in September then delayed till October and now told January at the earliest!
Hi Graeme, the global industry is impacted by the shortage of semiconductors. Unfortunately, the semiconductor situation is very volatile and can cause delays. Please stay in contact with your local Volvo retailer for the latest updates.
Just been told it’ll now be February 😭
I love Volvo cars it's really amazing and mind blowing || Mostly I love volvo car average || Volvo XC90 It's my dream car || Volvo is great.
Thank you for the support!
would be great to have more info on the comparison between hybrid types!
Hello, we are glad to hear that you are interested in our hybrid cars! Feel free to read more about our plug-in hybrids and mild hybrids here: www.volvocars.com/intl.
Very impressive
Car of my dream
What do you love the most about the Volvo XC60? /Niamh
Waiting for my 2022 unit to get delivered
🎉😢 I l❤ve Volvo cars I fond of..
Explained 👌
I am have Volvo xc60 and this is beatiful car and on Volvo first safety
나의 꿈의 자동차…
다음 인생에 타보자…
I'd like to know if Volvo will offer an upgradable version? For example, in 8 years, when battery technology will improve, will we be able to just upgrade the battery pack? Get more autonomy by just upgrading the battery? Isn't it the main reasons for "ecological" cars?? Buy less... Buy longer... buy better??? I currently have a Ford C-Max Energi 2013. To battery pack is at 15% of what it was. The car still is in great condition, but.... I don't have anymore electric autonomy... And I can't even upgrade the battery pack!!
No doubt a beautiful mid sized Plug in Hybrid SUV. I had actually planned on a test drive of this very vehicle tomorrow. However the cost of it is simply too much. I really do like the features and the powerful engine along with the Hybrid system which gives it plenty of power. I simply can't see spending over $60k on it.
You can get a t6 for 40k
Volvo is very safety and cool car,good luck Volvo.😁😁😁
Thank you for your support!
I like the V90 the most!
I don't like the changes in the XC60 FL model.
❤
🤍 /Niamh
Great Car 2022
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Me : Dear God .. I would like to travel
God : Get a Volvo Car and then go
Did you cancel Drive Mode Selector and Start/Stop setting?
You can change the drive mode via settings in the center display.
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Now we have to talk to Google like to our friend? "Hey google, can you switch yourself OFF?" ))
I drive Volvo (XC90), I love it, but I don't like when computers decide what I have to do )
If they really wanted to make it environmentally friendly, they would have made rhe internal combustion engine E85.
Nice❤
What do you love most about it? /Jade
what this color name ?
8:35 Where have I heard that song recently? What is it?
The song is Genesis by Justice!
@@VolvoCars Thanks Volvo Cars
It’s a smart car where you have to swipe left and right to switch between changing FM station and then swiping back to see which station you’re on. UI design failure.
Ahahahah ….Justice??!? FRENCH music 🤗 la classe!!
Where is V60 D3?
Wht i like u dnt sell in India
best safest cars
once i grow up i'll only buy volvo
volvo is the reson for safty revolution
I'm in a Volvo family and I love our Volvo but every Volvo owner with the automatic boot lid knows that the foot opening really couldn't have been done in one take. Never works on the first try
It worked every time I tried it on a Polestar 2, so they might have improved it. :)
I think every car is the same😂
Only 50km?? Are you joking???
So now volvo started to develop concierge service to compete BMW.
I want to tell you to fix the shortcomings if you want a real car brand to become number 1. If so, then the old days are better. When everything is perfect, you can sell the car, but most cars have too many minor breakdowns. The car that made it perfect will be number one. Any brand should keep this. It may not just go into the future. I have to go back to the past and start from the beginning You may. It is certain that the gear rod is better than the button type. Electricity is better when the car door is opened, but the car key is better when the power is turned off. Electricity is better only when the door is opened
Mind blowing that you still continue making these fossil cars presented as something green. STOP! Power from braking back into the 48V battery? You would need a 400V system to recuperate all the energy from breaking. You might do 10% with this car.
So true!!!
It is not a 48 volt system
@@dobrien757 The mild hybrid is 48V.
volvo please make a volvo sports car
🎉
🤍 /Niamh
Please bring the plug in hybrid in India. Mild hybrid of xc60 launched now, maybe this will launch after 5 years
..... Why do you do this volvo? 😭
Well a nice car without GPS because the system from Google is not working, you can not set to use even your data and of course there is no Apple Car or Android Auto... My recommendation, look for another car or wait, because we are buying cars that they don't work
And please, DON'T stop to make petrol engines (modern and hybrid ones), otherwise in some time you will lose these technologies!
They stopped development of their combustion engines several years ago. Battery electric is taking over because they are more efficient, silent, low to no service, stronger (no need of a gear box). And range is increasing as prices are falling so we will soon be at breaking point where BEVs are cheaper to produce. There is no turning back.
Got to watch a lot of XC 60 Model Year 2022 owner review videos .. seems like, Volvo has removed Drive mode selection wheel, removed Pilot Assist invocation from the steering, Four Zone Climate control not working if the front AC vents are not working, Music controls on the steering wheel not able to stop / pause the music ... these are some of the know issues !! Truley disappointed. Why on earth Volvo release such a buggy product to market ?
Hire a professional host next time
This car only manufacturing by billionaire
Volvo
So snob
Obviously you don’t know that the creation and disposal of all of those batteries is more harmful to the environment than just a gas engine. Ty Vulvo for not KARENg about our environment…
Let's ignore all people who have died and will die from the polution from all combustion engines.
@@sweetbon76 you mean car accidents? Or is this some twisted screeching liberal offshoot of feelings vs facts? Please be specific.
Volvo wouldn't have been this great if not Geely China owning them #MadeInChina2025 #BeltAndRoad 🇨🇳
HYDROGEN AS BATTERIES : HYDROGEN BATTERIES. Electric vehicles must switch to use hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries.
People often think about hydrogen as fuel, but many forget that hydrogen is not only a fuel, but also very good battery, too.
1/ The fundamental science dictates essential truth of all chemical batteries :
if a chemical energy storing mechanism is charged as quickly as producing hydrogen, then this mechanism PRACTICALLY CANNOT HAVE BETTER ENERGY CONVERSION RATIO THAN ELECTROLYSIS PROCESS. Besides, it is possible to setup and adjust electrolysis reaction speed (for example slow down speed) to reach energy conversion ratio of electrolysis better than any chemical batteries. The best one of all possible chemical batteries in AEROBIC earth conditions is HYDROGEN BATTERY. All revolutions of chemical batteries, lithium batteries, LFP batteries, LTO batteries, graphene batteries .. are for reaching to the features of hydrogen batteries.
2/ New concept : hydrogen battery = (fuel cell + hydrogen storage object).
The most simple hydrogen battery = 1 fuel cell + 1 compressed hydrogen balloon 300bar, can easily beat best lithium batteries by all features : more capacity, more power, less weight, forever lifespand, no degradation, charging in 5 minutes, same or better energy conversion ratio, but just noremarkable bigger volume sized than lithium batteries.
3/ So just equip electric vehicles with hydrogen batteries instead of chemical batteries. And equip hydrogen filling stations with mobile electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+ bar on site from electrical outlets. Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations (hydrogen battery charging stations) can run electrolysers from electrical outlets to produce liquid hydrogen on site, to avoid suddenly leap change requirements for big number of already existing current liquid hydrogen cars in the markets. But liquid hydrogen has low energy conversion ratio. For now and near future, compressed hydrogen (produced on site) is more versatile for various applications.
(Additionally envisagedly, owners of ANY SMALL COMPRESSED HYDROGEN MOBILITY VEHICLES/ROBOTS/DEVICES can buy small mobile household electrolysers to recharge hydrogen batteries at home at night/any times).
4/ Example and comparison : hydrogen cars vs battery cars, hydrogen batteries vs chemical batteries :
The old approach sets high H2 cost because : they pay for making H2, then they pay much for converting H2 to liquid H2, then they pay much for transporting liquid H2 by trucks (complex safety trucks, and very small weight of liquid H2 on every trucks), then thay pay for keeping cryogen conditions to store liquid H2.
But in new approach of ‘electrolysing hydrogen filling station” : you use electricity from electrical outlets at electrolysing hydrogen filling stations to run electrolysers to produce compressed hydrogen 300+bar on site. So you pay only for electricity and water ofcourse. No other fees. No complex cryogen equipments.
Compare : hydrogen batteries vs lithium batteries in the approach of “electrolysing hydrogen filling station” :
4.1/ Grid transmission loss : hydrogen battery charging and lithium battery charging onsite cause same grid transmission losses.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.2/ Energy conversion ratio in charging : (electric energy -> chemical energy)
Electrolysers in quick mode (very high electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio about 70%. Lithium batteries quick charging has energy conversion ratio about 60-70%.
Electrolysers in slow mode (small electrolysis reaction speed) have energy conversion ratio 90%. Lithium batteries slow charging has energy conversion ratio 90%.
Conclusion : electrolysers win, because of the ability of flexible modes of scheduling and functioning to reach higher energy conversion ratio.
4.3/ Energy conversion ratio in performance : (chemical energy -> electric energy)
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 75+% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 70-% in mode of intensive power performance (when require delivering much walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Fuel cell has energy conversion ratio about 85+% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat. Lithium batteries have energy conversion ratio about 95-% in mode of nointensive power performance (when require delivering less walt/seconds), energy loss in form of heat.
Conclusion : Equal.
4.4/ Energy loss in energy packing compressing process :
Hydrogen battery using compressed H2 300bar cause about 3-5% energy loss for compression. But hydrogen battery weight is very small.
Lithium battery loses 0 energy in compression. But lithium battery weight IS INHERENTLY HIGH.
That means you always need to transport noneccessary lithium battery heavy weights on your vehicles every seconds. -> The higher power category, the higher loss with lithium batteries. The longer range, the higher loss with lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win with big advantages
4.5/ Lifespan :
Hydrogen batteries have practically forever life span.
Lithium batteries have lifespan about 3 years. Some good ones have 5 years. Other modern modified lithium batteries have more lifespan but smaller capacities. But all of them degrade every year.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.6/ Influence of environment temperature :
Hydrogen batteries never fear environment temperatures.
Lithium batteries fear environment temperature. Even in some seasons you can not or your ineffectively use lithium batteries.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.7/ Charging time :
Hydrogen batteries : load compressed Hydrogen 300+bar or exchange compressed hydrogen canisters 300 bar in 3-5 minutes.
But you must waste minimal 30 minutes for nofull charging lithium batteries, and often you must waste some money for paying some unnecessary things in fool waiting times too. -> waste time + waste money.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
4.8/ Synchronyze with grid supplying schedules :
Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can easily pick up flexible schedules to run electrolysers in tandem with grid supplying schedules. So Electrolysing hydrogen filling stations can pick up right hours of day for incentives electrical tarif. Nets of electrolysing hydrogen filling stations ideally use intermitten clean energy/renewable energy.
But electric charging stations can not pick up times. High power electric charging stations terribly conflict with intermitten shedules of clean energy/renewable energy. The more higher power electric charging station in quick charging mode, the more terribly it conflicts with intermitten energy supply schedules of clean energy/renewable energy.
Conclusion : hydrogen batteries win.
FINAL NATURE TRUTH VERDICT : HYDROGEN CARS WIN MANYFOLD AGAINST BATTERY CARS.
Just need to make right approach, and right choice
Wait there’s not lot of space .. rear seats are not adjustable plus no worth to spend $80000 , understand the safety but literally no worth to spend this much. I was very excited to drive this car but when I figured out that the rear space is not enough to sit and even not adjustable though. Please improve this features rather than giving worthless ones..
no hate but i am very disappointed 😢
I fell in love with XC60❤️🔥🤍
Just I’m watching videos about this car and decline calls or messages😅 All I’m thinking is XC❤️🔥
❤