Hello. I got some new insights from the lecture. But I got a few questions. 1. Like if RMSD is not a perfect metric to analyse equilibration because it gives an inadequate impression of the 'potential wells' in which the system maybe present, then what would be the correct metrics to understand equilibration? 2. For example, if radius of gyration is also dependent on the position of atoms then how is it much different from RMSD when it comes to measuring stability? Is it a more closer representation of the real potential energy surfaces than RMSD??
Hello. I got some new insights from the lecture. But I got a few questions.
1. Like if RMSD is not a perfect metric to analyse equilibration because it gives an inadequate impression of the 'potential wells' in which the system maybe present, then what would be the correct metrics to understand equilibration?
2. For example, if radius of gyration is also dependent on the position of atoms then how is it much different from RMSD when it comes to measuring stability? Is it a more closer representation of the real potential energy surfaces than RMSD??