Driverless tech sparks concerns in Austin | KVUE
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2023
- Driverless technology has been cruising the streets of Austin as companies test out autonomous vehicles. But new video is raising concerns about how the cars act.
STORY: www.kvue.com/article/news/loc...
Subscribe to our channel: th-cam.com/users/kvuetv?sub_...
KVUE is Austin's ABC affiliate station and has been delivering local news for Central Texans since 1971. Today it is owned by TEGNA, Inc., which reaches approximately one-third of all television households in America. www.kvue.com
Still driving way better than a lot of the drivers here in Houston
The true issue is that Texas doesn't provide its citizens with enough public transportation, but regardless AI is not where it should be with driver-less cars, it's so clear to see.
There’s no such thing as “driverless” technology. Everything in the world exists under human command.
For example, if your car gets a speeding ticket while it’s on cruise control, you can’t claim that the computer was at fault.
The the “Driverless” claim is designed to break human chains of command. That way the government can intervene directly, without having to consult local authorities. Washington D.C. can issue an arrest warrant, and then men in helicopters will pick you up.
This makes zero sense
I go for walks at night in this area of town. I had 11-14 or so of these cars pass by me. I felt surveilled. In 2020 and beyond, via face scanning temperature sensors and use of video chat they easily have a full database of everyone's face. They have a database of everyone's faces and voices; they can deep fake us if they want to control more. They can now track where we are if we go outside without our phone using these sentinels.
If it works 99.9% of the time, they could easily OFF anyone the government doesn't like via running you over or just put a turret or gun on top and call it a malfunction. The swerve into the bike lane is not an error. It is a feature.
These cars easily can zoom in on your face with those cameras to know who is where anytime they want.
Of course they run 10:30-5:30a. That's when the curfew will be in a socialist government new world order.
If you're out, they will know.
@@arpwcos2011 it does make sense. Sheriffs are local final say in law enforcement. It is probably a way to get around that.
There is tricky law regarding driving vs operating a motor vehicle and the terms used. He is not making something up. I have heard that before.
That car is gonna get jacked down there. Terrible idea.
This is what ChatGPT-3 said. Autonomous cars have the potential to improve road safety, reduce traffic congestion, and provide greater mobility to people who cannot drive, such as the elderly or disabled. They can also increase fuel efficiency and reduce emissions. Additionally, autonomous cars can free up time for people who would otherwise be driving, allowing them to use that time for other activities, such as work or leisure.
Ho no not !!! I don't want a car with not a driver !!!
Oh yeah, they talk about how many people are killed in car crashes but they never ever ever talk about how many people are killed in motorcycle crashes. And we never hear about self driving or riding motorcycles.
Swerving, riding in the bike lane. I want to see this traffic stop and the officers face. Does it know how to answer questions and show license, insurance and registration 🤔? 😆
I must’ve missed the notification on this… why is it that we need autonomous vehicles?
So some rich people, some of whom probably don't even live here, can get richer.
Productivity.
@@youtubewatcher4603 Waste of resources.
Because it's one step closer to having full automation when it comes to jobs. It's not just driverless cars and taxis it's anything that could be driven like a semi or a construction vehicle like a tractor or a bulldozer or something you don't need people to do that anymore. And I can't wait. I wish this was available where I live even if it was the same rate as an Uber I wouldn't have to deal with a driver who possibly could be sick.
@@jaimemunoz5920 My sarcasm didn’t require a literal answer. We don’t need autonomous vehicles. With automation comes more control over what you can and are allowed to do as a human being. You’re worried about getting sick in an Uber? That’s real classic.
I've ridden in those cars multiple times without any incidents. Felt pretty safe and smooth to me. They still have a lot of room for improvement, but they are getting better every day.
Wow they even localized the driving skills!
Will be for cruise needs to start launching to Roble taxi service in Austin they need to get things fixed first. But what I cannot wait for is for that same company to come here to Seattle to start doing testing hear that way people like me could start using that service just like I do Uber right now.
The company will probably take all of the profit that would have gone to the driver saving the rider maybe the cost of a tip that I would gladly pay at this point in the technology.
Why Austin ? Could of picked Dallas
They're coming. Announced it on the news a few days ago
We're are all the drivers going to work
Didn't y'all watch irobot? Or any other robot movie? We know how this ends… Yet were sprinting toward complete automated control.
When human drivers drive the bike lane no problem!
That’s dope. We need more of these
This guy on bicycle California transplant? He even following it and talking to it. Cyclists want to share the road right? Equal rights to the car to travel its own way. There is likely no law saying a car shall not enter a bike lane. The lane is marked to tell cyclists that is where they shall ride, and tell motor vehicles where to expect cyclists. If there was a cyclist or even a person standing there it would have avoided them. Theses cars are avoiding all the objects they are not supposed to come into contact with.
So it’s cool that he happened to observe these specific navigational fails bc obv they need to be adjusted but people in the comments losing it or acting like wElL tHeY gOnNa GeT jAcKeD … we’ve had autonomous cars in austin as far back as 2015 and they’ve had a huge variety of issues but for the most part they seem to still have less accidents than Austin’s human piloted cars….
The fact it could hit someone is just a minor inconvenience huh? Ok. Gotta break a few eggs, I mean, legs ... ?
Meanwhile just in 2021 austin had 435 car accidents involving pedestrians with 61% of
Those being fatal. I’ll take my chances with the robots
Austin is trash as a whole. The fact that robots and AI have to do the job of a human is a pretty big sign. But YoU’Ll tAkE YoUr chAnCeS wiTH rObOTs 👍🏼