AMCA's DSI intake Ready | Why DSI? why not previous one like F22?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • The in-house CFD code NUMBERS is used for evaluating the performance of the intake. The solver NUMBERS is a structured in-house code which solves the Euler and the Navier-Stokes equations in the compressible flow regime. The turbulence models implemented in the code are Baldwin-Lomax, Spalart-Allmaras /1/ and Menter SST /2/ models. The viscous derivatives are calculated by the least -square method. The equations can be solved by predictor-corrector MacCormack scheme, central-difference Jameson scheme /3/ and upwind H-CUSP scheme
    ===================================================
    WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN
    Most of the pictures clip or BGM included in the Video Belongs to their Respected Owners and we do not claim rights...but under this,👇 we are using them 🙏
    ===================================================
    DISCLAIMER: UNDER SECTION 107 OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT 1976, ALLOWANCE IS MADE FOR "FAIR USE" FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING, SCHOLARSHIP, AND RESEARCH. FAIR USE IS A USE PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT STATUTE THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INFRINGING. NON-PROFIT, EDUCATIONAL OR PERSONAL USE TIPS THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF FAIR USE.
    Facebook ► / indiatubedesk
    Twitter 1 ► / indiatubedesk
    Twitter 2 ► / amitraaz
    ˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍˍ
    SOURCE► #DefenceDecode
    Video: NIKHIL, AFRL
    BGM: Akash Gandhi (Eye of Glory)
    Reference: Research gate, Jane's fail, HAL manual
    ====================================================
    THANKS FOR WATCHING,
    PLEASE LIKE SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO THE DEFENCE DECODE
    ====================================================

ความคิดเห็น • 349

  • @nicku21negi
    @nicku21negi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Fluid dynamics is a very complex subject.
    However, nicely explained.

    • @Amitraaz
      @Amitraaz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I didn't even triad to explain FD here, it's one of my favourite subjects, I restrained my self to go into details at various point, ppl call it boring, otherwise i was in a mood to explain the whole boundary layer concept, and what a stream line and turbuce flow does to the intake air😄😃

    • @souravdutta1377
      @souravdutta1377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Amitraaz where and how can I learn about FD ?? Please tell me. 🙂

    • @souravdutta1377
      @souravdutta1377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Amitraaz and is it your 2nd and back up channel ??

  • @RahulYadav-nk6wp
    @RahulYadav-nk6wp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    DSI intake is an essential component. Its good to know about OPRDs. There's always tradeoff between using DSI and not using it. Another great video. F22 was designed to go WVR first, but switch to BVR if needed. The USAF required another jet to fill the gaps of F22, a jet than complement it and help in BVR. F35 has a single engine producing a dry thrust of 128KN. It's a significantly larger engine but it is still slow. Thus you would need a DSI. F22 can reach confidentially estimated mach numbers up to 2.6. At such speeds, you need a larger intake and since its a twin engine jet, DSI will only hinder its speed at High Bypass. Its designed to go fast, but yes DSI would help in expelling the intake air at high speeds too. Thus AMCA design uses best of both world technologies

  • @abhishukla6588
    @abhishukla6588 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    दूसरे जहाँ सिर्फ कथा करते है, आप विज्ञान भी परोसते है । अच्छा एप्रोच...👍👌💐

  • @vivekpallikona8094
    @vivekpallikona8094 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Wow, what is your qualification? Your very good at heat transfer and fluid dynamics,I appreciate your work 😍.

    • @pranavrastogi458
      @pranavrastogi458 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He is a researcher and own some patent

    • @SuputraBharathi
      @SuputraBharathi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pranavrastogi458 what's his name ? How to contact him ?

    • @Dino_551
      @Dino_551 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SuputraBharathi
      His name is Amit R Kashyap.
      I don't know how to contact him but he may reply you on Twitter.

    • @eliteevildarkness5830
      @eliteevildarkness5830 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is a space Engineer

    • @chandigarhspotter2345
      @chandigarhspotter2345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bhai apne mechanical engineer hain...😌

  • @abhishekchoudhary928
    @abhishekchoudhary928 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bro you are actually utilising the lockdown period well. Keep up the good work. Subscribed

  • @santanuroy9101
    @santanuroy9101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Until India develops own aircraft engines, India will be forced to depend on other nations. India must not give up. India must keep on working on indigenous engine and if possible buy engine technology in lieu of huge defense deals. India must learn from Japan.

    • @shaileshkumar6010
      @shaileshkumar6010 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think kaveri engine was completed,right?

    • @PPSRHD
      @PPSRHD 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shaileshkumar6010 nah man. It's a joke among the people who work in the defence field.😂

    • @shaileshkumar6010
      @shaileshkumar6010 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gaming Zone with GOD hmm,I think if india takes help with France,it would be completed,since they are one of the leading defense manufacturers from a long time,so they definitely know and if possible,for radars and other technical equipment we can take Israel's help(if we can't do it alone)since they are leading in smart technology.

    • @PPSRHD
      @PPSRHD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Gaming Zone with GOD only time will tell my dude. The Indian military does not have that much faith in the Government run industries. They take too long to develop and when they do deliver it's sub parr. Allowing private companies to compete with Agencies like DRDO will greatly benefit the forces.

    • @PPSRHD
      @PPSRHD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Gaming Zone with GOD you just prove my. it took DRDO god knows how many years to develop an engine which is not even functional for its proposed function

  • @iamward0g
    @iamward0g 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    India should set up public fund for research and development on kaveri engine 😁😁😁 like if you will donate

  • @golubhaicpmishra
    @golubhaicpmishra 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Gazab bhai.....
    A
    You always surprise with a depth study of new things coming up...
    Now i stay assure not to study from my own end, coz i know you will come up with that😊

  • @abhinavnayan4829
    @abhinavnayan4829 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The way u explain the difficult engineering term in a very simply way is amazing

  • @shivamparmar7526
    @shivamparmar7526 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those who thinks that , without engine it is nothing ! Just check the Whole Tejas programme ! Tejas was delayed due to a continuous design phase & not a fixed design . Engine supply from General Electrics was on time, but due to changes in design led to delay of the programme . Although engine is necessary ! But completing & finalising & fixing a design is a major step towards development of a fighter jet ! & After this design & RCS testing we are just left with work of engine Development & we will surely build our own Indigenous Engine .

  • @roshantagade743
    @roshantagade743 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Make video on Japanese Jet Engine xf 91 made within 10 year with dry trust of 108Kn.

    • @saneshubham50
      @saneshubham50 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Not 10 years it took them 23 years, design and development started in 1995 and 1st prototype of engine was delivered in 2018 on top of that Japanese had an experience of building Low pressure components for High bypass ratio turbo fan engines for commercial airliners in collaboration with General Electric, Pratt & Witney & Rolls Royce where as we have never worked on any jet engine be it low bypass or high bypass be it in collaboration or solo, Japans partnership in defense technology with the west all these years have helped them a lot to acquire know how of defense tech, we were busy being Soviets puppet at that time who hardly ever transferred any technology to us or set up any joint venture to produce defense hardware in India, comparing Japan who has access to high tech western tech with India is like comparing apple's with oranges however we too need to have our indigenous jet engine there's no question about it.

    • @maheshshah7570
      @maheshshah7570 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks

    • @doom2000000
      @doom2000000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Technologically India is now a member of elitest group of technologically most advanced countries. India produces cutting edge space products with highest level of technology at cheapest possible price. Such level of precision and prefection is not seen in our western counterparts.
      As our drdo chief Dr G Satish reddy always makes it clear that India is self reliant and has become strong in area of missile technology, radar technology, sonars, electronic warfare systems, displays and guns. Our tejas is way ahead in terms of technology when compared to any chiense or russian jet. Russian technology is third grade but cheap while chiense weapons are expensive paper weight copied from russia. Many many more futurstic weapons are being developed by drdo. One of them being laser weapon. Drdo has already developed a 250kw laser weapon which is undergoing testing. And is being taken to more advanced level. India deployed its laser weapon to protect trump during his India visit. China doesnt even have an anti icbm defense system. While Indias anti icbm defense system is way ahead of american thaad. Today no country in the world can sneeze in direction of India let alone harbour the thoughts of attacking us. Even though china had s400 yet they chickned out of doklam. There are many examples where american weapons have been found wanting.

    • @leaderbad1548
      @leaderbad1548 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@doom2000000 wow......do they pay you for writing all that bs?

    • @doom2000000
      @doom2000000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@leaderbad1548 its hard facts. Better get used to it.

  • @rajanothayothkarat7832
    @rajanothayothkarat7832 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very interesting and informative presentation. PL. keep us enjightened on such things.

  • @christopherrobin9472
    @christopherrobin9472 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can y'all put English subtitles that would help thank you very much!

  • @sdas7731
    @sdas7731 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An easy to understand perspective on inlet design. Thank you Amit.

  • @vishalnayak3966
    @vishalnayak3966 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for beautifully explaining the concept

  • @kamalbhullar5035
    @kamalbhullar5035 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well described. DSI K Kyi article dekhe but kaafi chize aapki video ne clear kr di

  • @erwinrommel9137
    @erwinrommel9137 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    AMCA needs 5th gen indigenous engine that can supercruise without afterburner.
    And Does the problem related Air intake on LSP fixed ?

    • @voiceofreason3101
      @voiceofreason3101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah in that case we won’t even get the aircraft by 2050

  • @Witcher1989
    @Witcher1989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    So they used f 35 technique, AMCA looks like hybrid of f 22 and f 35..

    • @RahulYadav-nk6wp
      @RahulYadav-nk6wp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It is, but frontal nose cone aspect are elongated more. It's nose cone is larger in comparison to the two. Meaning we can fit a larger AESA radar with higher number of TR modules and still be able to fit more sensors. It also helps is generating lift at low speeds and reduce air drag much better than F35 as per initial study done by ADA.

    • @Witcher1989
      @Witcher1989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RahulYadav-nk6wp larger AESA radar needs a powerful engine...

    • @mihirsrivastava1113
      @mihirsrivastava1113 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Witcher1989 that why we r using F-414 EPE Engine which produces 118 KN of thrust for AMCA

    • @Witcher1989
      @Witcher1989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mihirsrivastava1113 let's hope AMCA doesn't face the same fate as Tejas

    • @mihirsrivastava1113
      @mihirsrivastava1113 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Witcher1989 well AMCA will not face the issue bro

  • @yashrajbajpai3779
    @yashrajbajpai3779 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir aap hi Ek Aise ho jinko pure basic knowledge he Jis topic per aap videos banate Ho bake to sab paper reading kr dete hein

  • @anshkalia2543
    @anshkalia2543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    sir, how does the su-57 cope up with this problem?
    and in the past, soviet jets like the mig-31 could achieve speeds upto mach 3. Did they use the same concept?

    • @firestarter9784
      @firestarter9784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Su-57 has ramps + front looking LERX

    • @RahulYadav-nk6wp
      @RahulYadav-nk6wp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@firestarter9784 LERX are used mostly for low speeding, sustaining high alpha at subsonic speeds or lower and can be used as air breaks. Yes could divert air away form air intakes, but it does nothing much than that. RAMPS, yes they do help channeling air away during high bypass requirements when achieving higher mach numbers.

    • @dipayansaha4101
      @dipayansaha4101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RahulYadav-nk6wp what is the range of su30 mki radar

    • @firestarter9784
      @firestarter9784 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RahulYadav-nk6wp then you hav'nt seen the LERX of su-57

    • @riteshguleria3557
      @riteshguleria3557 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      dipayan saha 400 km

  • @rancho0071
    @rancho0071 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got some questions.... Please answer kardijiya......
    WHY AMCA??? Why not AHCA (Advance heavy weight combat Aircraft)
    If you are spending in Stealth then why not make a Heavy weight Aircraft with Long range and better weapon package?
    F-22 can carry 8 internal missiles and AMCA only 4?
    AMCA Having a very week BVR Missile compared to F-22 and F-35?
    AMCA Have less range than F-22.
    (It makes no sense to use Stealth fighter near you border only, if it cannot even go deep in enemy territory where actual defence are installed.
    If it will come to China we will not even be able to make a dent in their main land.)
    I know you might argue that we never plan on hitting Main land China, we will only defend our Border and etc.etc.
    But my question if you are spending money than your weapon should have the capability to take out your enemy entirely.
    If you will do it or not will depend on Army and the National policy.
    In this times when war rarely happens, we must focus on superior technology rather than human Skills, which will be rarely be tested in Air Combat.
    Design wise (Even though not finalised) it’s so much inferior to F-22 or F-35?
    And there is no comparison of Engines. (Very inferior engines used in AMCA)
    What’s the point of making stealth fighter if it cannot even maintain a standard set by F-22 10 Year's back?
    For India maybe we should have focused on suppressing enemy defence system rather than stealth.
    I am only stating my genuine concern hope you can find answers to these question.
    And hope fully our AMCA will have at least better Stealth than Su-57. Because pretty sure it will be inferior to F-22 when it comes to stealth.
    (I So much wish that my concerns are proven wrong by DRDO and Companies getting involved in this Future project of India)

  • @detectivesroy
    @detectivesroy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Ab to yeh ek hybrid jet lag raha Hain F-22 & f-35 ka

    • @Harsh12-l6b
      @Harsh12-l6b 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      F22 jaisa hona chahiyae

    • @piyushjoshi01
      @piyushjoshi01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ye sirf representative images hai. Actual design model 2020 ke end me ya 2021 ke start tak reveal hoga

    • @detectivesroy
      @detectivesroy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@piyushjoshi01 defense decode ne post ki hai, kuch to similarities hoga

  • @rangpo8935
    @rangpo8935 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can we collaborate with Japanese IHI corporation to make a engine. Japan is very underated friend of India. XF5 engine can become a base for the development of our own engine! To counter Chinese power, if India and Japan collaborates it would be beneficial for both the companies!

  • @AshishKumar-vx4ii
    @AshishKumar-vx4ii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love your analysis. Very technical

  • @omkarraut9318
    @omkarraut9318 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video nice scientific knowledge

  • @defenceupdatesindia6306
    @defenceupdatesindia6306 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can u make a vedio on the comparision between AMCA AND F22

  • @RetrowaveUniverse
    @RetrowaveUniverse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Defence Decode, what if we make the bump with flexible composites? hmmmm...... then we can make the DSI intakes work for different Mach values.

  • @ravimusic8665
    @ravimusic8665 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your work is indeed pretty amazing.

  • @77ronghosh
    @77ronghosh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good technical explanation.

  • @mr.mindreader5523
    @mr.mindreader5523 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How can an aircraft have a fixed air intake, since air density varies with altitude even within specified service sceling..?

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the bump is designed purposely, which generate shockwave and slow down the air. However there is some limits on speed.

  • @raipawan02
    @raipawan02 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, Boundary layer- technical sound description

  • @vasu0806
    @vasu0806 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent information

  • @jungleowl
    @jungleowl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super. Nice explanation with graphics for easy understanding. Tks. But sir a common man will not be so inclined to go through thus technicality. But appreciate your efforts to make this video. Jai Hind.

  • @Jaspreetsingh-cj7yr
    @Jaspreetsingh-cj7yr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    NICE VIDEO BRO

  • @amarpadwal7261
    @amarpadwal7261 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice informative Vdo 👌👌👍👍👍

  • @praveenrajable
    @praveenrajable 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice

  • @harikrishnanks9366
    @harikrishnanks9366 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please compare the RCS of AMCA with f 35 and f22

  • @stupidburp
    @stupidburp 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    DSI is light and simple but efficiency is limited to certain speeds. F-22 uses a different type in order to have greater efficiency at high speed.

  • @vasantnaik4723
    @vasantnaik4723 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting and informative vedio.
    Sir why kaveri engine is not successful. If kaveri programme fail then we we make purvown jet engine for aircraft

  • @adeshkarve1008
    @adeshkarve1008 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Amit for reverting to my question on previous video..

  • @bcp6086
    @bcp6086 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about difference in air density. How would it's variation affect the aircraft

  • @ratnaker25
    @ratnaker25 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liked it man.... You are good..... if possible, Please help us know how rafale were better option than tejas.... Apart of single and dual jet engine.....

  • @Akshay-np5zq
    @Akshay-np5zq 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow wt a knowledge...!!! Explanation too gud...this subject is your interest of area

  • @pakairforceali7747
    @pakairforceali7747 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both hi bahtaeen
    Boht achi video hai

  • @yugalsharan
    @yugalsharan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you make a video on Japanese Jet Engine ? We don't have much info available on it right now, Amit. Thanks for sharing so much technical info on AMCA.

  • @loopbloke
    @loopbloke 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Range of infrared sensors, information integration, and radar range can over take such limitations.

  • @kittu.artandcraft
    @kittu.artandcraft 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice information bro

  • @vinaydrm9953
    @vinaydrm9953 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Bhai itna analysis app aeronautics padhee ho kya...
    AHCA ka Koi plan hai

  • @maheshshah7570
    @maheshshah7570 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    India must work on engine, radar, and missile technology for the success of the any fighter plane .thanks.

    • @subhajitsikdar6184
      @subhajitsikdar6184 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      India is already mastered in radars nd missiles...bt engine is nt upto mark...😔😔😔..hope india will do it one day....

    • @doom2000000
      @doom2000000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Technologically India is now a member of elitest group of technologically most advanced countries. India produces cutting edge space products with highest level of technology at cheapest possible price. Such level of precision and prefection is not seen in our western counterparts.
      As our drdo chief Dr G Satish reddy always makes it clear that India is self reliant and has become strong in area of missile technology, radar technology, sonars, electronic warfare systems, displays and guns. Our tejas is way ahead in terms of technology when compared to any chiense or russian jet. Russian technology is third grade but cheap while chiense weapons are expensive paper weight copied from russia. Many many more futurstic weapons are being developed by drdo. One of them being laser weapon. Drdo has already developed a 250kw laser weapon which is undergoing testing. And is being taken to more advanced level. India deployed its laser weapon to protect trump during his India visit. China doesnt even have an anti icbm defense system. While Indias anti icbm defense system is way ahead of american thaad. Today no country in the world can sneeze in direction of India let alone harbour the thoughts of attacking us. Even though china had s400 yet they chickned out of doklam. There are many examples where american weapons have been found wanting.

    • @PomegranateChocolate
      @PomegranateChocolate 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.unz.com/akarlin/science-production/

    • @PomegranateChocolate
      @PomegranateChocolate 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@doom2000000 "Technologically India is now a member of elitest group of technologically most advanced countries."
      Who told you that?! Modi? India is a shithole. Even Saudi Arabia outperforms India in terms of scientific output:
      www.unz.com/akarlin/science-production/

    • @doom2000000
      @doom2000000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@PomegranateChocolate Better get used to facts clown. Another example. Ceo of google, microsoft, adobe, ibm and many more companies are all Indians. Indian brain power forms dna of biggest tech companies in the world. Indian sillicon valley generates more than 160 billion dollars yearly.
      I know facts hurt your mental stability.

  • @Shri_KashiVishvanath
    @Shri_KashiVishvanath 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some how you helping to our enemies to counter our technology

    • @lastperfectman
      @lastperfectman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right he is mad. He doesn't know that Pakistan China is there.

    • @lastperfectman
      @lastperfectman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Flowasky brown ok

  • @arijitsaha557
    @arijitsaha557 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very much informative

  • @manansheth3084
    @manansheth3084 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It depends on engine then...

  • @jitmanyukohli2887
    @jitmanyukohli2887 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai, mast knowledge hai aapko♥️♥️

  • @Electronics61
    @Electronics61 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @saiecorp5646
    @saiecorp5646 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice video and very helpful information.

  • @pradyumnapatra1356
    @pradyumnapatra1356 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanations 👌👍

  • @swarnimsingh2272
    @swarnimsingh2272 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir AMCA looks like J 31. How it is different from J 31 in it's design?

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      both are similar copy cats………

  • @pawanvarma5773
    @pawanvarma5773 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir u r ultimate

  • @prabhatpanday4144
    @prabhatpanday4144 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amitji namaskar. You explain very well all the technical details. How much percentage did India achieved in the jet engine. Will we succeed in a short time or is it going to take longer.

  • @Luckypatil15
    @Luckypatil15 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it possible to have adjustable single bump like ramp acuated through spring loaded assembly

  • @himanshusinghmewar3061
    @himanshusinghmewar3061 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amca kaa speed kya hoga ...or yaa kinthay fit per fly kra gaa

  • @RahulYadav-nk6wp
    @RahulYadav-nk6wp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question? Why our AMCA has no smooth surface like extremely flat design at the Top, core section of F22, I assume it due to reducing drag?

    • @piyushjoshi01
      @piyushjoshi01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Design to be revealed by end 2020. These are just representative images

  • @balu18bala
    @balu18bala 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When can we see AMCA from drawing board to final bird?

    • @raycms7655
      @raycms7655 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      AMCA Ioc aircraft after 2025

  • @blackpigeon4743
    @blackpigeon4743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I personally like this step

  • @vigneshanand3348
    @vigneshanand3348 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Air intake design dictates up to which Mach number , inlet flow can be decelerated without flow instability .

  • @abhilash3931
    @abhilash3931 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    U deserve more n more subscribers bro..bcs ur videos r awsm .. n jai hind

  • @videovideo7652
    @videovideo7652 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir you well knowledge aeronautical and physic ...
    You may be join DRDO or GTR

  • @narendraattri5910
    @narendraattri5910 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jai hind I don't have much knowledge about air-intake but the air intake which a Rafael aircraft have I mean to say if we have the same air intake plus 98 n thrust we have almost equal to both the engines of Rafael aircraft only thing after burner power is less than Rafael for that engine power we are looking at new Kaveri engine which are producing 52 n thrust each can we try this engine on jaguar aircraft as airframes are available with iaf as we have purchased second hand aircraft I means Rafael aircraft electronic equipment and warfare have the qualities and importance on one place but it's climbing rate is really impressive that is to 304 m per second which is a very imp point comparatively to other aircraft can we produce such an aircraft which can have this type of climbing rate in future.

  • @Rocky_Rocks
    @Rocky_Rocks 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If add Subs, You will reach more audience. Good Work.

  • @akapriyanshusinghdev
    @akapriyanshusinghdev 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MAKE VIDEO ON RADAR OBSERVENT MATERIAL😎

  • @dinesharora7837
    @dinesharora7837 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation.

  • @tejabhadu2822
    @tejabhadu2822 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great knowledge bro, keep it up

  • @suvadipchakraborty9356
    @suvadipchakraborty9356 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your awesome content.

  • @roopraimanraj8010
    @roopraimanraj8010 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the final design of amca many different designs pictures of amca r floating I'm confused what is final design? please reply thanks

  • @Rushline
    @Rushline 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simple FI vs CARBORATOR

  • @vishwanathp5407
    @vishwanathp5407 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    VERY GOOD AND DETAILED INFORMATION 👌👍👏😀.
    C-5 GALAXY KO HINDUSTAN 🚩🙏KYON NAHI KHAREEDA !!?? IS KE UPAR EK VIDRO BANAYIYE PLEASE 🙏.
    JAI MODI JI 😎🚩🙏.
    JAI HIND 🚩💪.

  • @benimadhav420
    @benimadhav420 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You deserve more subscriber🖐🏼

  • @RishiKumar-qq2gg
    @RishiKumar-qq2gg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai I think you work in an aerospace industry.Your knowledge is far more.

  • @sonikankur
    @sonikankur 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amit g Namashkar... What about multiple intakes? which open at different air requirements ... This will also reduce radar signature!! These can be in shape of tubes infused in body starting from nose section to engine... Im not a engineering guy but out of curiosity!!

  • @Robin-ku8sl
    @Robin-ku8sl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    AMCA should have speed of 2.25 Mach at high altitude, with any type of air inlet...

  • @chinusharma8459
    @chinusharma8459 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice News for Amca

  • @vishalvishal-yt5us
    @vishalvishal-yt5us 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir ji.

  • @ketanraut7457
    @ketanraut7457 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any latest updates on super sukhoi stealth coating . And any update on Sukhoi T-60 pigeon .

  • @vikrant7424
    @vikrant7424 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So it is final that we will be using DSI intakes like f35....tht means our amca will also be able to achieve very high AOA similar to f35...bt that also depends on the sharpness of our design.

    • @deathtocommies4797
      @deathtocommies4797 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      F35 mein nhi hai dsi intake

    • @vikrant7424
      @vikrant7424 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @RANJANA GUPTA yes...upto 50 degree

  • @indianwolf007
    @indianwolf007 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do we want to save money and take more risk with limiting the max speed or sending more vibrations to the engine ?

  • @amvedin
    @amvedin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, please tell us how does SU 30 MKI solves this problem. I have a feeling that the Russians do not use actuators but I may be completely wrong. Please throw some light on this.

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      su30 mki, like f 14 and f15 , use ajustable intakes

    • @souravdutta1377
      @souravdutta1377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yixinmei5854 are you from China ??

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@souravdutta1377 That’s right dude.

    • @yixinmei5854
      @yixinmei5854 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@souravdutta1377 If you are interested in DSI , asking Chinese may be a good choice.

    • @souravdutta1377
      @souravdutta1377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yixinmei5854 may be.
      Actually not many Chinese do positive or healthy comments like you. I saw many of them comments hated and I remembered their TH-cam name also. Once I just commented in a Chinese travel video nd and said that it is very good nd acknowledge-able. Even the video & channel guy like it but suddenly some Chinese people started bulshting at reply. It gone even few days....in 20017. Even after also I didn't see much Chinese viewer does positive comments...u can count thrir numbers on finger. That's why I was curious. 🙂

  • @vikaschandila9924
    @vikaschandila9924 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why the engine outlet is not covered just like in f22? It may increase RCS.

  • @devrajbishtdevubisht5344
    @devrajbishtdevubisht5344 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kiya bat sir good job

  • @1989livewire
    @1989livewire 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If tejas's air intakes are not upto the mark then as per the pictures online mk2 has the same intake , we cud have/shud have designed it as DSI. What is ur take on this?

  • @amitSingh-je8vh
    @amitSingh-je8vh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro Amit you must join Indian Defense Technology Sevices to contribute your knowledge in indian defense technology

  • @bhanusinghasarkar8388
    @bhanusinghasarkar8388 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Engine for AMCA plz make vedio

  • @goulunmate9667
    @goulunmate9667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I cnt wait..

  • @ranjitsingh-qt4cg
    @ranjitsingh-qt4cg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is su 57 is good option then mmrca 2 ???

  • @rajatsharma267
    @rajatsharma267 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bhai....f-22 me horizontal stabilizer kun laga h. or vo concept AMCA me use kun nhi kiya h.

  • @mohantybb
    @mohantybb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always check the progress of AMCA and TEJAS .i m just curious whether is this the world-class aircraft? , better maneuver compare to F22 and Sukhoi 35 ?.is this the best composite material used better stealth than other stealth aircraft available ?

    • @doom2000000
      @doom2000000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Su 57 is a million moons away from being a 5th gen fighter jet.
      Russian technology is third grade but cheap while chienese weapons are expensive paper weight copied from russia. Hardly anyone buys russian arm these days as they are unreliable and require a lot of constant service. China is only customer with a lot of money.
      As our drdo chief Dr G Satish reddy always makes it clear that India is self reliant and has become strong in area of missile technology, radar technology, sonars, electronic warfare systems, displays and guns. Our tejas is way ahead in terms of technology when compared to any chiense or russian jet. Tejas rcs is 0.5m2 and tejas mark 1a will have even lesser rcs. While sukhoi rcs is 5m2.. sukhoi will be easily detected by radars at very long. This is just one example of how superiority of tejas.

  • @shivshankarsingh2769
    @shivshankarsingh2769 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which fighter jet is India buying for MMRCA .114jet are about to buy .

  • @kunalpratapsingh8957
    @kunalpratapsingh8957 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Waah good explanation...🙌

  • @rajeshsethi8208
    @rajeshsethi8208 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice 👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌

  • @romeykumar7200
    @romeykumar7200 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bhai g I don't understand all this but pls suggest something which helps our engineers to build world's best aircraft

  • @manna4u977
    @manna4u977 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pls make a video.of engine exhaust, is it like F22?