Many years later I still cannot believe this attorney allowed his client to incriminate himself in such monumental fashion. The way Sandusky paused when talked about kids at one point in the interview gave me the impression he was getting sexually excited just thinking about past encounters.
I LOVE this dude, whoever he is! He's so absolutely outraged by the entire situation and it really comes through in the visual. He can speak for me ANYtime.
+Daniel Dougan What? You mean the same bob costas who talks about gun control during the sunday night football halftime show? Guess you love his figure skating coverage. Only costas can tell you about American society when you just want to watch a fucking game.
Yes, and I agree with him about gun control. Sometimes we have to look at what happens in the sports world in broader context. I'm sorry you want to turn off your brain while watching football. I don't. That sort of attitude is part of what helped Jerry Sandusky get away with his crimes. Bob is great at baseball play-by-play in particular.
Daniel Dougan Bob Costas is complete garbage. He is too stupid to make 60 minutes so he forces it during football half-time. His Brazil coverage was a disgrace. He's never been a stones through away from a Hilton and he's lecturing about the poverty and corruption of a third world country when they are competing for international sports.
pronkb000 He was not wrong about stating that Brazil's government is corrupt. It wasn't the time or place. He is also not an authority on these issues whether it be gun control, Redskins name, or third world policy. Taking his opinion as legitimate is a logical fallacy (appeal to celebrity). He's a sports journalist.
@modelleg I agree. You can hear the hopelessness in his voice. He has absolutely no energy to even defend his actions because he knows he's so sick and so wrong. He's like a serial killer who gets sloppy because they want to get caught.
How is he out on bail? The judge who let him out on bail volunteers at his charity. Also, he lives practically next door to an elementary school. Insane.
@10:19 Costas' point is so true (just because Sandusky didn't go after EVERY kid doesn't place him in the clear). I would add that child molesters particularly are predators who learn how to "read" their victims, figuring out which ones can be controlled and manipulated and which ones will talk if touched. Sandusky simply knew what he could get away with--and I can't believe his lawyer doesn't know this, as well.
His wife says that he treated her well and was a good father. Regardless of what happened, Sandusky has some mental conditions that made him awkward at times but excellent at knowing how a football field works & how to coach players. Notice how he responds. Most criminals would’ve denied everything but his brain has him responding in ways that sounds strange. The media convicted him and we all believed that a young grad student coach witnessed Sandusky raping a young child in the shower so all of us screamed for Sandusky’s death. You can look up the grand jury testimony yourself and the person who testified. Then look at what he actually said in 2001. None of the four men who were part of Penn State’s leadership would have ever covered up a child rape for any reason let alone to protect PSU. Someday this scandal will be a study in media ethics where mainstream media scrambled to be among those condemning because they had no fear of being sued. Seriously, you can find the truth about how the allegations were made & it’s scary how our media manipulated our trust. Regardless of guilt, Sandusky was convicted before he could ever get to trial.
Win Rosie That’s a good question. In a perfect world people wouldn’t find one perceived flaw to make a big deal about a statue. But in that climate itje statue was going to constantly be a target for individuals & even groups who claimed that it caused them pain. Having lived near PSU & also in a state that once flew the Confederate flag over its state house where some saw it as symbol of history & others as hate, I felt that if it didn’t represent everyone that it shouldn’t be on Govt property. Same for the statue. Some day the Sandusky Scandal will be studied like other cases in history. They are going to find out that the facts alleged to the Paterno & the other 3 administrators was vastly different than the grand jury testimony. The grand jury investigators might have been well meaning but they prepared those who testified so they thought that they were helping the criminal justice system to take the next step in investigating potential criminal acts. They thought by explaining that they received info almost a decade earlier that only in hindsight when added to the currently available info could be used to investigate. But The person who actually gave them the information in 2001 was really worried about his own neck because he had allegedly sent pictures of his genitalia to a PSU student who was not his wife. He had great motivation to be perceived as very helpful and necessary to the investigation so suddenly he changed his story to say that he told those Paterno & the others that he witnessed a little boy being raped. Of course it made him look bad too & he tried to change his story again. But the media ran with that & suddenly grown men are supposed to have covered for an evil predator caught in the act. The supposed victim was almost 14 then, not a little boy, who later became a marine (Sandusky was at his wedding). There is no one among us who would see something like that and not call the police immediately nor have something like that reported to us when we were in a position of authority and not dial 911 immediately. That was the media hook that generated the outrage as well as clicks, views & ratings. But as long as a statue is a source of pain for ppl, even if only due to their perceptions, then taking it down was appropriate, especially when considering that there is undoubtedly students in that university population who at one time or another might have been sexually abused or assaulted. For them, seeing the statue of a man that they erroneously believed enabled another perpetrator may be truly painful.
What on earth was Amendola thinking letting him do that interview? Was he just being grossly incompetent so Jerry Sandusky could appeal his conviction later on the grounds that he did not have adequate counsel?
Classic case. He has long ago re-defined molestation as horseplay and any number of other innocent terms. The language has become more important than the morality, as it allows him to escape into a safe room in his head where he's always kind Jerry horseplaying with the kids. He is probably bewildered as to why (in his terms) people are being so accusatory.
Furthermore Sandusky may as well start negotiating for the coolest possible spot in hell. Also if it was my son or daughter he molested and threatened if they told, trust and believe their would be chicken/fish frying and people crying at his funeral!!!
Sandusky says, "I'm innocent of the THOSE charges". the best question to follow up would have been, "Are you guilty of other charges not yet revealed?" I would love to hear that answer.
Saying the word "those" is another classic liar move. It's a further distancing word between himself and the charges, by choosing not to say "the charges" and instead say "those charges." It's like Bill Clinton's "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
The problem with these cases, is that most intelligent people follow current events. Most have seen this on the news in some context. That most likely gives the defending attorney cause to cry "prejudice" to these people being jurors. Thus, the jury pool is reduced to a majority of people who are more uninformed, more uneducated people. That's good for the defense. Another thought is that they may be playing at the "inadequate counsel" angle to get a guilty verdict overturned at the end.
"Are you sexually attracted to young boys?" "Am I sexually attracted to underaged boys---sexually attracted... you know i enjoy young people. i love to be around them. i... but no, i'm not sexually attracted to young boys." yeaaah we wanted a "no" there, just a no would have done
@friendsofjeremy The coach had a separate locker room and shower, but insisted on using the players' shower. Not only that, he purposefully touched naked children in the shower. Sharing a communal shower is one thing if an individual maintains a respectful distance. Purposefully seeking contact, especially with young children, is creepy.
I still try to understand Sandusky's response when he said, "I didn't go around seeking out every young person for sexual needs that I've helped. There were many that I didn't have...I hardly had any contact with that I've helped in many ways." To me, this was an admission of his guilt that he's had sexual relations with some of those kids while not with others, which is still a crime.
in a society where people look the other way while a crime is being committed to their fellowmen, it's no fun at all. in a society where people (drug, alcohol, child pornography & prostitution lords) benefit from other people's crimes (child abuse & pedophilia leading to drug & alcohol abuse (for the victims)), it's a mad world ...
Horsing around in the shower? Is that what you call it? Well, Jerry, where you'll hopefully be going, there's alot of horsing around the shower. You're going to love it.
PenguinProseMedia if you see something and you don't know what to do you go to the one person you trust more than anyone for Mike it was his father and his father told him go to Joe because he is the most trusted man in state college and paterno did absolutely nothing mcquerry didn't want to ruin Penn State football paterno didn't want to ruin all he built curley didn't want to ruin Penn State football and Shultz didn't want to ruin an otherwise great university they all did the wrong thing I think paterno is a good guy but not did he dropped the ball and now his legacy is this
@MrFaisel34 You are correct, but also in university police protocol is an effort to "tone-down" enforcement to save the lives and careers of the students. Many of the shenanigans that go on in college could be seen as much more serious crimes in normal life. I know it sounds silly, but that's how it works. Sandusky of course is not a student, but still prone to shenanigans.
I watched the interview. Sandusky shot himself in the foot during the interview. Not doing the interview might not have saved him from jail, but might have made it a wee bit harder (3% harder) for prosecutors to try the case.
Sandusky is now in jail, and will likely spend the rest of his life there. This is not the end of the prosecution: The cover-up will probably go all the way to Harrisburg and the Governor's office. It will come out that the current Governor and at least his two most recent predecessors will be charged with obstruction of justice and likely go to jail as well.
At first blush, it looks like Sandusky and his lawyer are stupid to allow him to do this interview. However, now that anyone who has seen this interview believes even more that he is guilty, his lawyer can now claim that he can't get a fair trial.
duh, Sandusky's out on bail cause it's the "good ole boys club" and the Judge is a life member of the club. Don't need to read anymore into it than that! The better questioning would be to confront the Judge (post trial) and force feed him that same question Bob Costas. "Why was Sandusky allowed bail, pre trial?? Helloooo!
@enferno00 Yes, he did. The University Police Department officers are FULL FLEDGED policemen and women. The head of the University Police Department is a FULL FLEDGED policeman/woman. They can shoot you and arrest you just like any city police officer. The main difference is their jurisdiction is the campus, but they are connected to the city police officers. They are not campus security guards like most people outside of Pennsylvania seem to think.
it was very weird how he had a hard time with the sexual attractive question. one thing I will say is that showering with a kid like that would not be quite as weird as showering with some strange neighbor at your house. A locker room and after workouts and so forth is different. That being said, this guy should be in prison. Just wanted to point out the difference from a football player's point of view.
Maybe it is a tradition at Penn State for coaches to shower with young boys. Those European soccer players come out in the beginning of games each won with a little boy. Then they play soccer and fall down in the grass and start crying like little babies. What a sport.
The attorney made the right move having Sandusky do the interview. He's already been convicted in the court of public opinion, so he had to gamble and speak out. The problem is that Sandusky completely bombed in the interview. When asked if he's sexually attracted to young boys, the immediate answer should've been 'No' w/o any equivocation.
Not a football fan at all, dont care if they outlawed football and boxing tomorow. I understand that a kid who gets brain damage for life might be worse off then a kid who gets molested, but it depends on the indivisual and the situation. The significant difference is that any person with average intelligence KNOWS the inherent physical risk in football, NOT the sexual risk of child molestation.
@ranchgoddess i refuse to judge based on what i know. i pray it didnt happen. p,laying devils advocate, he may have been pausing in regards to lawsuits...also...psychopaths can lie convincingly...
@TheAthena999 Hes not helping his case your right but even so, where is the solid evidence. Are we to believe 40+ people kept quiet this long? 40 kids nontheless? ever try keeping 1 kid quiet? Not only that, are we to believe the parents knew nothing. So that 40 kids plus 2 parents each, thats 120 people kept quiet. Alot! Only time will tell, but unless or until i see solid evidence, hes innocent.
@enferno00 And you can't see why? Do you really believe that the University Police Department and the State College police are independent of the University? Let me be the first to tell you they are not. My friend has first hand experience of this and I have witnessed this at another large Pennsylvania University (UPENN). This is only the case with large rich Universities that bring in lots of Sports or Research cash.
Gerry Sandusky is free and has a nice job as the voice of the Baltimore Ravens. Jerry Sandusky, however is still in prison being Bubba's playmate...as he should be.
Bible says that in order to be forgiven, you have to repent, that is, be full of remorse, sorrow, regret, guilt, and to cry out to Jesus Christ, admitting your guilt and begging for forgiveness. Then it's up to God to forgive you, you cannot command his forgiveness, you can only ask for it.
Here in America it is innocent until proven guilty. Not the other way around. Just figured i would teach you so called "Americans" a small fact. Not saying i dont think he did it, but nobody has the right to judge without proof. And i havent seen shit.
Are Catholic Priests Jewish too? Why tie religion to these awful acts? What happened is horrible and there's is no logic to what you are saying. I'm sorry if you were molested as a child and you have tremendous anger inside. Take care!
@pistachio0891 Dan Patrick is a self important robot. I wonder what he sounds like in real life when he's not using his anchor man voice and pretending to care about things.
As bad as Sandusky is, to use this interview in a "sweeps week" type tease is absolutely vile and despicable...Bob Costas is the lowest of the low, to use this to boost ratings and re-vitalize his pathetic career.
Many years later I still cannot believe this attorney allowed his client to incriminate himself in such monumental fashion. The way Sandusky paused when talked about kids at one point in the interview gave me the impression he was getting sexually excited just thinking about past encounters.
There's an old saying. If you let someone talk long enough, they'll tell on themselves
Let Sandusky talk for 2 minutes freely and you can hear more evidence that he is guilty of child molestation. Unbelievable.
All I can say is what a sick bastard…I appreciate Dan showing his passion and anger for this situation.
I LOVE this dude, whoever he is! He's so absolutely outraged by the entire situation and it really comes through in the visual. He can speak for me ANYtime.
Dan Patrick a great personality in any radio/news aspect. Great Man
@@stephensullivan1879 And I've never seen him so angry, about anything. This case obvious had a deep personal resonance with him. Why, I do not know.
He’s Dan Patrick…..sports broadcasting legend…..now you know…..
Whenever Bob Costas talks, I have to listen. He's totally unflappable and, unlike a lot of people in the sports world, actually sounds educated.
+Daniel Dougan What? You mean the same bob costas who talks about gun control during the sunday night football halftime show? Guess you love his figure skating coverage. Only costas can tell you about American society when you just want to watch a fucking game.
Yes, and I agree with him about gun control. Sometimes we have to look at what happens in the sports world in broader context.
I'm sorry you want to turn off your brain while watching football. I don't.
That sort of attitude is part of what helped Jerry Sandusky get away with his crimes.
Bob is great at baseball play-by-play in particular.
Daniel Dougan Bob Costas is complete garbage. He is too stupid to make 60 minutes so he forces it during football half-time.
His Brazil coverage was a disgrace. He's never been a stones through away from a Hilton and he's lecturing about the poverty and corruption of a third world country when they are competing for international sports.
What was he wrong about regarding Brazil, exactly?
pronkb000
He was not wrong about stating that Brazil's government is corrupt. It wasn't the time or place. He is also not an authority on these issues whether it be gun control, Redskins name, or third world policy. Taking his opinion as legitimate is a logical fallacy (appeal to celebrity). He's a sports journalist.
Costas = Brilliant
Patrick = Brilliant
Sandusky = Guilty
Dan is right, his voice is extremely creepy, and Bob Costas is a great interviewer
"I touched their leg..."
"looking back i shouldn't of showered with those kids" ahahahah CLASSIC...
Trading guilt.
@modelleg I agree. You can hear the hopelessness in his voice.
He has absolutely no energy to even defend his actions because he knows he's so sick and so wrong.
He's like a serial killer who gets sloppy because they want to get caught.
How is he out on bail? The judge who let him out on bail volunteers at his charity. Also, he lives practically next door to an elementary school. Insane.
@10:19 Costas' point is so true (just because Sandusky didn't go after EVERY kid doesn't place him in the clear). I would add that child molesters particularly are predators who learn how to "read" their victims, figuring out which ones can be controlled and manipulated and which ones will talk if touched. Sandusky simply knew what he could get away with--and I can't believe his lawyer doesn't know this, as well.
Back when someone saying "There will be an interview that will move the story along," actually meant it.
"Rhythmic slap, slap, slapping sounds!"
Costas did a great job.
In full detail I would like to know how Jerry treated his wife...
His wife says that he treated her well and was a good father. Regardless of what happened, Sandusky has some mental conditions that made him awkward at times but excellent at knowing how a football field works & how to coach players. Notice how he responds. Most criminals would’ve denied everything but his brain has him responding in ways that sounds strange. The media convicted him and we all believed that a young grad student coach witnessed Sandusky raping a young child in the shower so all of us screamed for Sandusky’s death. You can look up the grand jury testimony yourself and the person who testified. Then look at what he actually said in 2001. None of the four men who were part of Penn State’s leadership would have ever covered up a child rape for any reason let alone to protect PSU. Someday this scandal will be a study in media ethics where mainstream media scrambled to be among those condemning because they had no fear of being sued. Seriously, you can find the truth about how the allegations were made & it’s scary how our media manipulated our trust. Regardless of guilt, Sandusky was convicted before he could ever get to trial.
How do you feel about Joe's statue being taken down?
Win Rosie That’s a good question. In a perfect world people wouldn’t find one perceived flaw to make a big deal about a statue. But in that climate itje statue was going to constantly be a target for individuals & even groups who claimed that it caused them pain. Having lived near PSU & also in a state that once flew the Confederate flag over its state house where some saw it as symbol of history & others as hate, I felt that if it didn’t represent everyone that it shouldn’t be on Govt property. Same for the statue.
Some day the Sandusky Scandal will be studied like other cases in history. They are going to find out that the facts alleged to the Paterno & the other 3 administrators was vastly different than the grand jury testimony. The grand jury investigators might have been well meaning but they prepared those who testified so they thought that they were helping the criminal justice system to take the next step in investigating potential criminal acts. They thought by explaining that they received info almost a decade earlier that only in hindsight when added to the currently available info could be used to investigate. But The person who actually gave them the information in 2001 was really worried about his own neck because he had allegedly sent pictures of his genitalia to a PSU student who was not his wife. He had great motivation to be perceived as very helpful and necessary to the investigation so suddenly he changed his story to say that he told those Paterno & the others that he witnessed a little boy being raped. Of course it made him look bad too & he tried to change his story again. But the media ran with that & suddenly grown men are supposed to have covered for an evil predator caught in the act. The supposed victim was almost 14 then, not a little boy, who later became a marine (Sandusky was at his wedding).
There is no one among us who would see something like that and not call the police immediately nor have something like that reported to us when we were in a position of authority and not dial 911 immediately. That was the media hook that generated the outrage as well as clicks, views & ratings. But as long as a statue is a source of pain for ppl, even if only due to their perceptions, then taking it down was appropriate, especially when considering that there is undoubtedly students in that university population who at one time or another might have been sexually abused or assaulted. For them, seeing the statue of a man that they erroneously believed enabled another perpetrator may be truly painful.
She still loves him and thinks he's innocent.
Ignoring
What on earth was Amendola thinking letting him do that interview? Was he just being grossly incompetent so Jerry Sandusky could appeal his conviction later on the grounds that he did not have adequate counsel?
he let the monster go down
It was so satisfying seeing Bob Costas rip Sandusky to shreds.
Two interviewers interviewing each other about their interviews.
"We got Sandusky." -Bob Costas
I see a huge payout of hush money to all the accusers, case closed and sealed forever! The games must go on, the money must continue to roll in!
Costas is GREAT.
Classic case. He has long ago re-defined molestation as horseplay and any number of other innocent terms. The language has become more important than the morality, as it allows him to escape into a safe room in his head where he's always kind Jerry horseplaying with the kids. He is probably bewildered as to why (in his terms) people are being so accusatory.
Furthermore Sandusky may as well start negotiating for the coolest possible spot in hell. Also if it was my son or daughter he molested and threatened if they told, trust and believe their would be chicken/fish frying and people crying at his funeral!!!
Yes, just because you think it is unforgivable doesn't make it so.
Sandusky says, "I'm innocent of the THOSE charges". the best question to follow up would have been, "Are you guilty of other charges not yet revealed?" I would love to hear that answer.
Saying the word "those" is another classic liar move. It's a further distancing word between himself and the charges, by choosing not to say "the charges" and instead say "those charges." It's like Bill Clinton's "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
He’s so so so guilty.
The problem with these cases, is that most intelligent people follow current events. Most have seen this on the news in some context. That most likely gives the defending attorney cause to cry "prejudice" to these people being jurors. Thus, the jury pool is reduced to a majority of people who are more uninformed, more uneducated people. That's good for the defense.
Another thought is that they may be playing at the "inadequate counsel" angle to get a guilty verdict overturned at the end.
"Are you sexually attracted to young boys?"
"Am I sexually attracted to underaged boys---sexually attracted... you know i enjoy young people. i love to be around them. i... but no, i'm not sexually attracted to young boys."
yeaaah we wanted a "no" there, just a no would have done
@friendsofjeremy
The coach had a separate locker room and shower, but insisted on using the players' shower. Not only that, he purposefully touched naked children in the shower. Sharing a communal shower is one thing if an individual maintains a respectful distance. Purposefully seeking contact, especially with young children, is creepy.
fuck the fire, where theres this much smoke theres an inferno!
I still try to understand Sandusky's response when he said, "I didn't go around seeking out every young person for sexual needs that I've helped. There were many that I didn't have...I hardly had any contact with that I've helped in many ways." To me, this was an admission of his guilt that he's had sexual relations with some of those kids while not with others, which is still a crime.
He wasn't 6 months ago when that comment was posted
in a society where people look the other way while a crime is being committed to their fellowmen, it's no fun at all. in a society where people (drug, alcohol, child pornography & prostitution lords) benefit from other people's crimes (child abuse & pedophilia leading to drug & alcohol abuse (for the victims)), it's a mad world ...
Horsing around in the shower? Is that what you call it? Well, Jerry, where you'll hopefully be going, there's alot of horsing around the shower. You're going to love it.
I'd love to ask McQueary how many other felonies he's witnessed and just walked away and called his daddy instead of alerting the police.
PenguinProseMedia if you see something and you don't know what to do you go to the one person you trust more than anyone for Mike it was his father and his father told him go to Joe because he is the most trusted man in state college and paterno did absolutely nothing mcquerry didn't want to ruin Penn State football paterno didn't want to ruin all he built curley didn't want to ruin Penn State football and Shultz didn't want to ruin an otherwise great university they all did the wrong thing I think paterno is a good guy but not did he dropped the ball and now his legacy is this
Mcquery is as guilty as sandusky!!!!! How he kept out of trouble I don't understand
Jerry Sandusky Interview on Rock Center with Bob Costas (Full) ,,,,,,,,,
couldn't agree more with dan patrick... put him IN JAIL
@MrFaisel34
You are correct, but also in university police protocol is an effort to "tone-down" enforcement to save the lives and careers of the students. Many of the shenanigans that go on in college could be seen as much more serious crimes in normal life. I know it sounds silly, but that's how it works. Sandusky of course is not a student, but still prone to shenanigans.
Yes, Scary Movie with a little Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood thrown in...Good memory ;- )
Wow this is great. DP is great Bob is even better.
I watched the interview.
Sandusky shot himself in the foot during the interview.
Not doing the interview might not have saved him from jail, but might have made it a wee bit harder (3% harder) for prosecutors to try the case.
Sandusky is now in jail, and will likely spend the rest of his life there.
This is not the end of the prosecution: The cover-up will probably go all the way to Harrisburg and the Governor's office. It will come out that the current Governor and at least his two most recent predecessors will be charged with obstruction of justice and likely go to jail as well.
At first blush, it looks like Sandusky and his lawyer are stupid to allow him to do this interview. However, now that anyone who has seen this interview believes even more that he is guilty, his lawyer can now claim that he can't get a fair trial.
duh, Sandusky's out on bail cause it's the "good ole boys club" and the Judge is a life member of the club. Don't need to read anymore into it than that! The better questioning would be to confront the Judge (post trial) and force feed him that same question Bob Costas. "Why was Sandusky allowed bail, pre trial?? Helloooo!
@enferno00
Yes, he did. The University Police Department officers are FULL FLEDGED policemen and women. The head of the University Police Department is a FULL FLEDGED policeman/woman. They can shoot you and arrest you just like any city police officer. The main difference is their jurisdiction is the campus, but they are connected to the city police officers.
They are not campus security guards like most people outside of Pennsylvania seem to think.
What a different world it was before this
Proving once again DP is the best in sports radio.
bob costas: zero fucks given
im english does horsing around mean bum play
@f1471in3r thanks ,we dont use that phrase over here
She would pollute the water system.
I shower with my schnauzer-just sayin'. hey, I want to conserve water
im sure he'd admire you for that
it was very weird how he had a hard time with the sexual attractive question.
one thing I will say is that showering with a kid like that would not be quite as weird as showering with some strange neighbor at your house. A locker room and after workouts and so forth is different.
That being said, this guy should be in prison. Just wanted to point out the difference from a football player's point of view.
jerry sandusky we should go to to chuckie cheese and go ham
Shit man, that was Marv Albert, Costas has never done anything of that sort.
Maybe it is a tradition at Penn State for coaches to shower with young boys. Those European soccer players come out in the beginning of games each won with a little boy. Then they play soccer and fall down in the grass and start crying like little babies. What a sport.
You sir, are a professional troll.
The attorney made the right move having Sandusky do the interview. He's already been convicted in the court of public opinion, so he had to gamble and speak out. The problem is that Sandusky completely bombed in the interview. When asked if he's sexually attracted to young boys, the immediate answer should've been 'No' w/o any equivocation.
He knows 100% what a pedophile is. He just doesn't want to assign himself that title.
"Hello Loser" - Bob Costas
@tarhen12
He didn't. It was the psychopath Sandusky's decision.
how many times does the interviewer want him to say he was in the shower with the victim. I'ts almost like o forget it B)
thats what i was thinking of! i love the south central movie with the waynes brothers :)
Not a football fan at all, dont care if they outlawed football and boxing tomorow. I understand that a kid who gets brain damage for life might be worse off then a kid who gets molested, but it depends on the indivisual and the situation. The significant difference is that any person with average intelligence KNOWS the inherent physical risk in football, NOT the sexual risk of child molestation.
@ranchgoddess i refuse to judge based on what i know. i pray it didnt happen. p,laying devils advocate, he may have been pausing in regards to lawsuits...also...psychopaths can lie convincingly...
So you think guys like Adolf Hitler, Ted Bundy and Josef Fritzl deserve to be in Heaven just because they said "sorry" ? That's a revolting thought
Bob Costas forget to mention Jesse Owens and Carl Lewis greatest ever even if today they wouldn't qualify even for high school trials.
I wish Sandusky played with a horse!!!!
Yep.
This guy will get off he is rich and white - No way in America he gets what he deserves
sickening
@TheAthena999 Hes not helping his case your right but even so, where is the solid evidence. Are we to believe 40+ people kept quiet this long? 40 kids nontheless? ever try keeping 1 kid quiet? Not only that, are we to believe the parents knew nothing. So that 40 kids plus 2 parents each, thats 120 people kept quiet. Alot! Only time will tell, but unless or until i see solid evidence, hes innocent.
WTF???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@the5thYearSeniors So says Dr. the5thYearSeniors
@enferno00
And you can't see why? Do you really believe that the University Police Department and the State College police are independent of the University? Let me be the first to tell you they are not. My friend has first hand experience of this and I have witnessed this at another large Pennsylvania University (UPENN).
This is only the case with large rich Universities that bring in lots of Sports or Research cash.
@mnichols2011
Dan Patrick is the man, you kidding me?
damn costas is a pro
@Pauly69s
Marriage is legal with parental permission.
scary movie?
Gerry Sandusky is free and has a nice job as the voice of the Baltimore Ravens. Jerry Sandusky, however is still in prison being Bubba's playmate...as he should be.
agreed
mom is going to be mad hurry up
Jesus doesn't care what the sin is. As long as you ask for forgiveness you shall receive it.
Shut the fuck up bible thumper.
You're so gullible
Bible says that in order to be forgiven, you have to repent, that is, be full of remorse, sorrow, regret, guilt, and to cry out to Jesus Christ, admitting your guilt and begging for forgiveness. Then it's up to God to forgive you, you cannot command his forgiveness, you can only ask for it.
@shuart24 right, so pretty much exactly what I said just in more detail.
@MrJerrySandusky Like the sarcasm...GTFOH!!!!!
@mnichols2011 No its only you.
Delicious
You are a sick man
Here in America it is innocent until proven guilty. Not the other way around. Just figured i would teach you so called "Americans" a small fact. Not saying i dont think he did it, but nobody has the right to judge without proof. And i havent seen shit.
@jamescs1969
Isn't it because of the U.S. debt they own. lol
@MrJerrySandusky LLS
why isnt this guy in jail ?
Are Catholic Priests Jewish too? Why tie religion to these awful acts? What happened is horrible and there's is no logic to what you are saying. I'm sorry if you were molested as a child and you have tremendous anger inside.
Take care!
@pistachio0891 Dan Patrick is a self important robot. I wonder what he sounds like in real life when he's not using his anchor man voice and pretending to care about things.
FREE GERRY SANDUSKY!!!!
As bad as Sandusky is, to use this interview in a "sweeps week" type tease is absolutely vile and despicable...Bob Costas is the lowest of the low, to use this to boost ratings and re-vitalize his pathetic career.
Ridiculous.
Jerry has already been forgiven Jesus. He is forgiven for all of his sins.