@EvilEuropean the allies did 😅 lots of German civilians killed, lots of German women and children treated very badly. Also a lot of Nazis that did bad things didn't get prosecuted and America even put pressure on the brits to stop the trial of some nazis and succeeded.
@@malachytully5469The issue with this is the fact that jihadists are not remotely human by any stretch of the imagination.People worldwide must realise the quran is an intruction manual for the eradication of all opposition to islam by any means.
The guest at the end says “both sides must be held to account.” But that’s exactly the problem, the terrorists will only be held to account by the military forces.
So many legal experts, politicians and commentators that don’t have the remotest idea of what it means to serve as a member of the UK armed forces… and to be willing to put your own life on the line to protect the public. Why don’t we see politicians being prosecuted for giving the mandate to use lethal force if it isn’t warranted ?
2 Tier Justice How many PIRA terrorists were ""investigateda and iprosecuted " by the PIRA Army Council for shooting unarmed civilians police officers and soldiers?
The SAS do perfectly well against their targets within the law as it stands. They always went through the civilian legal process. All weapons were immediately handed in and forensically examined. They're the best trained soldiers in the world. We're lucky to have them. It's about time people who've never had a weapon fired at them learned to accept this and stopped opining from the comfort of their ignorance.
The British public has chosen. We want the SAS, under civilian oversight working within the law to apprehend terrorists and keep us safe. The hounding of our British soldiers is outrageous. It is perfectly okay if there is evidence to investigate soldiers but that has to be proportionate and with an understanding of the near impossible jobs we are asking them to do. Could it be that some so-called human rights lawyers care more about protecting the rights of the terrorists and more about making names for themselves than about applying sensible laws in a sensible way.
Imagine a football match where one team (let’s call this team SAS) plays by the rules and the other team (let’s call this team terrorist) doesn’t play by the rules, no matter how efficient, well trained & disciplined the SAS may be terrorism will never be eradicated because both teams aren’t competing on a level playing field. The only way to beat terrorism is to either operate outside the rules or create specific rules that are applicable for terrorism to beat them at their own game.
Yes agree times have change so the rule of engagement need to change. In the end terrorist organisations as you say operate under No rules so by that alone that is how they should be treated.
Absolutely ridiculous ! Some colleagues were under investigation for 12 years under the guise of the Abu Graibh enquiry. The odd thing was, of the 2 of them, neither were in the area at the time of the so called incident !!!!! Once the dodgy human rights lawyers had been outed for unethical/illegal practices, they were finally freed from persecution. Do the British public want their way of life defending, or not ?
I remember being at cub scouts and a ww2 soldier came in to talk to us. I asked why aren't you considered a criminal? Why didn't you get in trouble? And he explained that he was fighting because his country had asked him to do it. It was his job and his duty. I'm privileged to have been able to talk to him, and I'm so glad that I got that answer in my formative years, because I'm also privileged to have never had to fight myself because of the sacrifice of others. This discourse that makes what is a fundamental distinction for armed forces, up for debate is a bad idea. Yes the law needs to be clear, but comparing professional British troops to the I D F is a false equivalency. Shame on that last contributor. The world has only gotten riskier so it is quite suspicious this debate is being led in this direction right at this time.
The lady is talking out of her behind, Soldiers can disobey an order if he believes its contravening the law of armed conflict and human rights and they're taught exactly that.
Politicians have no right to speak about the actions on the battlefield. If they want to make those calls they should enlist and do so through proper chain of command. Then they can see just how clear those lines are on the battlefield
The University of York awards postgraduate qualifications to law students who research the careers of British Army veterans with a view to bringing charges against them for war crimes. Researchers are awarded grants to gather evidence from refugees who have been granted asylum in the UK and journalists. This research gives them credentials to embark on careers as Human Rights lawyers. How do I know? My daughter shared a house with a daughter of Tamil refugees at Uni, who was proud to tell me what her thesis involved: Researching the careers of two former SAS officers, including their operations in Aden and Northern Ireland before they joined the SAS and their careers as Private Military Contractors overseas after they had left the regiment. The world needs human rights, and HR lawyers, but what are seeing now is Lawfare, and not just against soldiers. I am bombarded with requests for donations to fund legal actions on environmental, DEI, privacy and immigration issues. I am beginning to think that they are self-righteously chasing not ambulances, but a gravy-train. Lawyers, eh? Who'd've thunk that?
The SAS are the best trained soldiers in the world, I absolutely trust their judgement, and am extremely grateful for their service. They should be extolled as the heroes they are not persecuted by pen pushers who have never done anything more dangerous than cross the street.
Politicians send soldiers to theaters of war all over the world. They do as they are ordered where every moment could be their last. Come back home and may face prosecution. What about some accountability for Politicians who don’t seem to understand, see or care at all about the consequences of the decisions they make.
The world’s a nasty place, thank god we have the SAS/SBS/SRS etc. They cannot fight pure evil in this world with their hands tied behind their back, in fear of prosecution after every engagement. This nation needs to start showing some gratitude and stand with our soldiers.
@@kurtgodel5236 The SAS are doing their job at cleaning up the worlds terrorists and they are told to go somewhere and do that so why should they then face consequences in the country that told them to do that?
People like these commentators, the metropolitan elite make me fume. People sleep peaceably in their beds at night, only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
From a soldier's perspective, it's not just the weight of duty, it's also the steady rhythm of the present that matters. So, to hold them accountable for actions taken during the chaos of war, when their understanding of their ability to even survive is based on their mental state of needing room to breathe (so to speak), to act, and to hope for their own survival (and that of their buddies).
Highly trained. Have exceptional judgement in all theatres and location of missions. Expert rescuers. Experts at target work. Never give up on a job. Britain is better for their services.
The interviewer isn't getting it at all, this guy hasn't said they are above the law, it's a process issue that's all. At no stage does the guy say that the SAS should be above the law. He's repeatedly said that they accept and have to work within the ECHR and the Geneva Convention!!!
ECHR states to protect Human Life. If they are a terrorist. They are a threat to many lives. The terrorist engineer could take far more lives than just one. That's in one singular attack!
12:54 The woman at the end was absolutely correct. Change the law if you think it's wrong, but follow the law at all times. Otherwise the concept of law means nothing and isn't worth having. An organised civilised society could not function effectively under such inoperable conditions. This reflects a fundamental principle of the rule of law, which is essential for maintaining order and justice in any society.
One of these people would survive a day of brisk skirmishing on Salisbury Plain, and a night out under the stars, with no sleeping bag. I think you know which one it is.
All sailors, soldiers and airmen need to have the basic laws of war and the other relevant conventions belted into them continually, especially those deployed. When l was an Australian naval officer some years ago now, l came within a single order of committing a war crime of engaging an innocent vessel in the Strait of Hormuz during the second Gulf War. l had to make the split second decision of an engage order or not based on the contact's profile We were so very close to the threshold of our rules of engagement, but thankfully in that moment l chose not to engage.and saved some civilian's lives. l am pretty proud of that by the way! That incident will be one of the things l will remember on my deathbed.
We are so lucky to have the SAS in our military. The best in the world. Politician (liars) trying to teach SAS soldiers how to deal with terrorism. LOL
The SAS must be answerable to the law - sorry - if war crimes in N Ireland, Afghanistan and Iraq are not to be repeated then there must be rules- the problem is that the terrorists are not always the targeted properly and there is duff or false intelligence that is being acted on: incidents have occurred where innocent civilians - have been wrongly or negligently identified as terrorists by defective intelligence in their own homes - this actually ends up acting as a recruitment sergeant for the benefit of the terrorists by manufacturing new outraged members of the public who end up adding to the ranks of the terrorists - outraged members of that public themselves join the ranks of terrorists because of the manifest injustice - this undermines the credibility the SAS and undermines the mission of restoring peace - inflaming the public by “wild west” cowboy chaotic, thoughtless engagement and summary execution will not result in achieving an end to terrorism it will just add to the new terrorist recruitment drive - ironically such covert ops end up being counter-productive and in the longer term devastating to the reputation and ultimate effectiveness of our Special and Regular Army Forces. Unfortunately, the price for having the fantastic special forces that we have are that they must be backed up by gold standard intelligence collection but ultimately if we are not to become like the tyrannical counties and oppressive regimes around the world then military excellence that exists must be underpinned by ethical ops and ultimately accountability and fair play - no matter that terrorists don’t abide by these rules as otherwise we slowly by “slippage” of standards become like the very lawless people that we are perusing - ironic and tragic as that may be. E.G. The present heroic decorated VC corporal of the Australian SAS who is now accused of rogue operations in Afghanistan.
The premise that a Drone is exempt from the rules of war and international law is ridiculous, if its illegal for a human operator on the ground its also illegal for a remote operated UAV
We went from tribes to villages to towns to city state to nation state, and the next logical step in social governance is a unified world before we leave earth, which is being tried right now.
On the other hand, there is often knowledge of the situation that the civilian leadership is aware of that a soldier is simply unaware of. And the debate over whether or not a certain action should be taken had ALREADY TAKEN PLACE by that ELECTED civilian leadership. To give a soldier the authority (or duty) to disobey an order based on his often limited knowledge of the overall scope, is LUDICROUS! I can give examples, if you like.
If there is a “moral mindset training” for military forces and police, not only will this help train or sensitize soldiers to the impact of their necessarily quick decisions, take the “best” decision in each instance during conflict, also the “maniacs” can be filtered out, and any PTSD may be much less following the participation in (armed) conflict - for the more conscious will the soldiers be and perhaps as a result less traumatized as a result of the decisions taken.
The investigation should take place at the time and if no issue wax found then the accountability should pass up the chain of command. If everyone was fine withbthe military actiobs at the time the responsibility should then pass to the politician who made the call.
I get rather annoyed by reference to Dresden being a war crime committed by the British - you forget the Americans continued the bombing the following day and it does not even gent mentioned! It is also a historical fact that the Russians asked us to bomb it as it was a significant centre of communications with significant factories contributing to the war effort. It was, of course completely untouched until that fateful night I have a friend whose parents were at the theatre in Dresden that night and who lived because they decided to leave for their farm immediately the bombs began to fall
I know its hard but special forces dont do things because there easy or id be doing it! We have to remain morally better than our enemies or what are we fighting for?
If you arrest the head of the terrorists and provide him with a lawyer, then in court it may turn out that the terrorist was sponsored by the USA. Therefore, the detention of such people must definitely be illegal.
You can engage in spec ops and follow respect basic human rights, claiming anything else is a false dichotomy. We can all chew gum and walk at the same time.
Dresden dies not mean that your SAS has the right to be Judge Jury and Executioner. The SAS were active in Gaza. The RAF were rargeting the Palestinian people and pointing out the areas that the bombs would be most effective.. methink the UK has lost its way years sgo.
All soldiers of all countries must be held accountable. The only exception is Israel. Its military can do whatever it wants because they are the sons of God. It is the new commandment that must be obeyed.
Well if you do not have a code conduct, you knoooow, what will happen, the animal mind, will begin acting on people, it has the mind of about a 7 year old, but it can take you over and you can go all down to living out on the open ground with two main thoughts, food qnd females, and they will doo alllll kinds of things in between. Bowey.
Imagine a football match where one team (let’s call this team SAS) plays by the rules and the other team (let’s call this team terrorist) doesn’t play by the rules, no matter how efficient, well trained & disciplined the SAS may be terrorism will never be eradicated because both teams aren’t competing on a level playing field. The only way to beat terrorism is to either operate outside the rules or create specific rules that are applicable for terrorism to beat them at their own game.
Too many people who have never served in the armed forces think that they have some ideas about combat. Sometimes you can find yourself fired upon by artillery using anything from phosphorus,anti personnel ( shrapnel) or ' cluster' munitions. Or very close range hand to hand fighting which might mean the one that is lucky with a knife. And some ' boffins ' think that they know better how to keep a cool head in such situations. My answer would be to pull the SAS out of the specialist arena and send in those Boffins!
Do TERRORISTS Respect Human Rights? NO. Its Ridiculous.
And if our troops don't respect human rights what makes them different from the terrorists.
During WW2, the Nazis did horrific actions but that didn’t mean the Allies did.
@EvilEuropean the allies did 😅 lots of German civilians killed, lots of German women and children treated very badly. Also a lot of Nazis that did bad things didn't get prosecuted and America even put pressure on the brits to stop the trial of some nazis and succeeded.
@@plagiarisedwordsI liked your comment and you are telling the Truth!!!
@@malachytully5469The issue with this is the fact that jihadists are not remotely human by any stretch of the imagination.People worldwide must realise the quran is an intruction manual for the eradication of all opposition to islam by any means.
The guest at the end says “both sides must be held to account.” But that’s exactly the problem, the terrorists will only be held to account by the military forces.
So many legal experts, politicians and commentators that don’t have the remotest idea of what it means to serve as a member of the UK armed forces… and to be willing to put your own life on the line to protect the public.
Why don’t we see politicians being prosecuted for giving the mandate to use lethal force if it isn’t warranted ?
I’m sure you’re not referring to Tony Blair?
He was made *Peace Envoy* for the Middle East! 😂
So true
They do a job to keep us safe
Very difficult to take prisoners when you’re working behind enemy lines. War is war, accept it is terrible or make it totally illegal.
2 Tier Justice
How many PIRA terrorists were ""investigateda and iprosecuted " by the PIRA Army Council for shooting unarmed civilians police officers and soldiers?
LOL cry more you sleepy dunce.
Are we no better than them, then?
how is that relevant?
LOL
The SAS do perfectly well against their targets within the law as it stands. They always went through the civilian legal process. All weapons were immediately handed in and forensically examined. They're the best trained soldiers in the world. We're lucky to have them.
It's about time people who've never had a weapon fired at them learned to accept this and stopped opining from the comfort of their ignorance.
The British public has chosen. We want the SAS, under civilian oversight working within the law to apprehend terrorists and keep us safe. The hounding of our British soldiers is outrageous. It is perfectly okay if there is evidence to investigate soldiers but that has to be proportionate and with an understanding of the near impossible jobs we are asking them to do. Could it be that some so-called human rights lawyers care more about protecting the rights of the terrorists and more about making names for themselves than about applying sensible laws in a sensible way.
Civvies should keep their noses out.
No, it could not. Lawyers have to defend people who have a reasonable case, regardless of their personal feelings.
If you unleash the dogs of war - you go all in - you don’t nanny over everything and bury them under myriad rules of engagement
@@justice6480 Inviting the opposition to do the same.
Imagine a football match where one team (let’s call this team SAS) plays by the rules and the other team (let’s call this team terrorist) doesn’t play by the rules, no matter how efficient, well trained & disciplined the SAS may be terrorism will never be eradicated because both teams aren’t competing on a level playing field. The only way to beat terrorism is to either operate outside the rules or create specific rules that are applicable for terrorism to beat them at their own game.
Yes agree times have change so the rule of engagement need to change. In the end terrorist organisations as you say operate under No rules so by that alone that is how they should be treated.
Absolutely ridiculous ! Some colleagues were under investigation for 12 years under the guise of the Abu Graibh enquiry. The odd thing was, of the 2 of them, neither were in the area at the time of the so called incident !!!!! Once the dodgy human rights lawyers had been outed for unethical/illegal practices, they were finally freed from persecution. Do the British public want their way of life defending, or not ?
I remember being at cub scouts and a ww2 soldier came in to talk to us. I asked why aren't you considered a criminal? Why didn't you get in trouble? And he explained that he was fighting because his country had asked him to do it. It was his job and his duty. I'm privileged to have been able to talk to him, and I'm so glad that I got that answer in my formative years, because I'm also privileged to have never had to fight myself because of the sacrifice of others.
This discourse that makes what is a fundamental distinction for armed forces, up for debate is a bad idea.
Yes the law needs to be clear, but comparing professional British troops to the I D F is a false equivalency. Shame on that last contributor.
The world has only gotten riskier so it is quite suspicious this debate is being led in this direction right at this time.
The lady is talking out of her behind, Soldiers can disobey an order if he believes its contravening the law of armed conflict and human rights and they're taught exactly that.
You sad child.
Politicians have no right to speak about the actions on the battlefield. If they want to make those calls they should enlist and do so through proper chain of command. Then they can see just how clear those lines are on the battlefield
The SAS and Armed forced have our full backing. Do whatever you need to do to regain control it's very simple
If the SAS want to tackle terrorism they don't need to go any further than our parliament.
The University of York awards postgraduate qualifications to law students who research the careers of British Army veterans with a view to bringing charges against them for war crimes. Researchers are awarded grants to gather evidence from refugees who have been granted asylum in the UK and journalists. This research gives them credentials to embark on careers as Human Rights lawyers.
How do I know? My daughter shared a house with a daughter of Tamil refugees at Uni, who was proud to tell me what her thesis involved:
Researching the careers of two former SAS officers, including their operations in Aden and Northern Ireland before they joined the SAS and their careers as Private Military Contractors overseas after they had left the regiment.
The world needs human rights, and HR lawyers, but what are seeing now is Lawfare, and not just against soldiers. I am bombarded with requests for donations to fund legal actions on environmental, DEI, privacy and immigration issues. I am beginning to think that they are self-righteously chasing not ambulances, but a gravy-train. Lawyers, eh? Who'd've thunk that?
I know one of the tutors sadly.
That gravy train wont pay itself!
The check of itself refugees turning on their hosts.
The SAS are the best trained soldiers in the world, I absolutely trust their judgement, and am extremely grateful for their service. They should be extolled as the heroes they are not persecuted by pen pushers who have never done anything more dangerous than cross the street.
Politicians send soldiers to theaters of war all over the world. They do as they are ordered where every moment could be their last. Come back home and may face prosecution. What about some accountability for Politicians who don’t seem to understand, see or care at all about the consequences of the decisions they make.
Who on earth would want to be a solder baeed on last lady's terms. Sure, she would be happy to go instead...
The world’s a nasty place, thank god we have the SAS/SBS/SRS etc. They cannot fight pure evil in this world with their hands tied behind their back, in fear of prosecution after every engagement. This nation needs to start showing some gratitude and stand with our soldiers.
Human rights laws should only apply to normal people not people who are looking to cause chaos and death
The SAS will be delighted to hear that.
@@kurtgodel5236 The SAS are doing their job at cleaning up the worlds terrorists and they are told to go somewhere and do that so why should they then face consequences in the country that told them to do that?
soldiers aren't juries or judges. they can't decide who has lost their human rights and who isnt
@@josephfoulger9628If you fight outside the rules of war, then you carnt expect to use it for your protection!
People like these commentators, the metropolitan elite make me fume. People sleep peaceably in their beds at night, only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
laws vs human nature , i'm not sure laws can ever win every time , the heat of the moment can take away our humanity .......
From a soldier's perspective, it's not just the weight of duty, it's also the steady rhythm of the present that matters.
So, to hold them accountable for actions taken during the chaos of war, when their understanding of their ability to even survive is based on their mental state of needing room to breathe (so to speak), to act, and to hope for their own survival (and that of their buddies).
The SAS just need to do the job they don’t Rupert and politicians telling them how to do the job
Highly trained. Have exceptional judgement in all theatres and location of missions. Expert rescuers. Experts at target work. Never give up on a job.
Britain is better for their services.
The interviewer isn't getting it at all, this guy hasn't said they are above the law, it's a process issue that's all. At no stage does the guy say that the SAS should be above the law. He's repeatedly said that they accept and have to work within the ECHR and the Geneva Convention!!!
Leave them to do what they are trained to do
Why are Soldiers being held Accountable For Having to do their Job that they have been Trained to do for Our Country
ECHR states to protect Human Life. If they are a terrorist. They are a threat to many lives. The terrorist engineer could take far more lives than just one. That's in one singular attack!
that woman is a dreamer
imo - no rules that the enemy doesn't also abide by - old adage - all's fair in love and war
12:54 The woman at the end was absolutely correct. Change the law if you think it's wrong, but follow the law at all times. Otherwise the concept of law means nothing and isn't worth having. An organised civilised society could not function effectively under such inoperable conditions. This reflects a fundamental principle of the rule of law, which is essential for maintaining order and justice in any society.
One of these people would survive a day of brisk skirmishing on Salisbury Plain, and a night out under the stars, with no sleeping bag.
I think you know which one it is.
One sas man as more guts and backbone than all the mps put together
Mr Pinkerton shows his distain for the audience / interviewer by not looking at the camera and folding his arms
Strange isn't it. Like he not comfortable showing his face. He always looks down.
When someone even mentions films about the SAS you know that what they say is not worth listening to.
All sailors, soldiers and airmen need to have the basic laws of war and the other relevant conventions belted into them continually, especially those deployed.
When l was an Australian naval officer some years ago now, l came within a single order of committing a war crime of engaging an innocent vessel in the Strait of Hormuz during the second Gulf War. l had to make the split second decision of an engage order or not based on the contact's profile We were so very close to the threshold of our rules of engagement, but thankfully in that moment l chose not to engage.and saved some civilian's lives. l am pretty proud of that by the way!
That incident will be one of the things l will remember on my deathbed.
The pen is mitier than the sword. Amazing what happens when your enemies get hold of the pen!
The British establishment actively uses terrorist proxies all the time. Sometimes the chickens come home to roost
We are so lucky to have the SAS in our military. The best in the world. Politician (liars) trying to teach SAS soldiers how to deal with terrorism. LOL
The SAS must be answerable to the law - sorry - if war crimes in N Ireland, Afghanistan and Iraq are not to be repeated then there must be rules- the problem is that the terrorists are not always the targeted properly and there is duff or false intelligence that is being acted on: incidents have occurred where innocent civilians - have been wrongly or negligently identified as terrorists by defective intelligence in their own homes - this actually ends up acting as a recruitment sergeant for the benefit of the terrorists by manufacturing new outraged members of the public who end up adding to the ranks of the terrorists - outraged members of that public themselves join the ranks of terrorists because of the manifest injustice - this undermines the credibility
the SAS and undermines the mission of restoring peace - inflaming the public by “wild west” cowboy chaotic, thoughtless engagement and summary execution will not result in achieving an end to terrorism it will just add to the new terrorist recruitment drive - ironically such covert ops end up being counter-productive and in the longer term devastating to the reputation and ultimate effectiveness of our Special and Regular Army Forces. Unfortunately, the price for having the fantastic special forces that we have are that they must be backed up by gold standard intelligence collection but ultimately if we are not to become like the tyrannical counties and oppressive regimes around the world then military excellence that exists must be underpinned by ethical ops and ultimately accountability and fair play - no matter that terrorists don’t abide by these rules as otherwise we slowly by “slippage” of
standards become like the very lawless people that we are perusing - ironic and tragic as that may be. E.G. The present heroic decorated VC corporal of the Australian SAS who is now accused of rogue operations in Afghanistan.
The SAS isn’t Hereford’s Private Army, able to do as they please! 😂
This seems to confuse two issues - soldiers in action and then subsequent detention and bail of any captured terrorists.
The law of armed conflict is pretty simple just use the phrase "it was my honest held belief" in court and you should be fine.
The premise that a Drone is exempt from the rules of war and international law is ridiculous, if its illegal for a human operator on the ground its also illegal for a remote operated UAV
We went from tribes to villages to towns to city state to nation state, and the next logical step in social governance is a unified world before we leave earth, which is being tried right now.
On the other hand, there is often knowledge of the situation that the civilian leadership is aware of that a soldier is simply unaware of. And the debate over whether or not a certain action should be taken had ALREADY TAKEN PLACE by that ELECTED civilian leadership. To give a soldier the authority (or duty) to disobey an order based on his often limited knowledge of the overall scope, is LUDICROUS!
I can give examples, if you like.
One word for this failure ECHR
Woman at the end forgets that terrorists forgo their human rights having descended to chimpanzee levels of behaviour
If there is a “moral mindset training” for military forces and police, not only will this help train or sensitize soldiers to the impact of their necessarily quick decisions, take the “best” decision in each instance during conflict, also the “maniacs” can be filtered out, and any PTSD may be much less following the participation in (armed) conflict - for the more conscious will the soldiers be and perhaps as a result less traumatized as a result of the decisions taken.
If we teach humanity that war is gay they’d be world peace over night. 😂
The investigation should take place at the time and if no issue wax found then the accountability should pass up the chain of command.
If everyone was fine withbthe military actiobs at the time the responsibility should then pass to the politician who made the call.
Absolutely ridiculous
Get out of the ECHR
I get rather annoyed by reference to Dresden being a war crime committed by the British - you forget the Americans continued the bombing the following day and it does not even gent mentioned! It is also a historical fact that the Russians asked us to bomb it as it was a significant centre of communications with significant factories contributing to the war effort. It was, of course completely untouched until that fateful night
I have a friend whose parents were at the theatre in Dresden that night and who lived because they decided to leave for their farm immediately the bombs began to fall
It's expressed as "Two Two SAS", not "Twenty Two...". Basics.
Is he looking out for ninjas? Keeps looking over his shoulders.
Its the end of the UK was we know it!
Use legal DISCRETION and not witch-hunts, simple
Why won't this guy look at us?
This woman living in larr larr land
I know its hard but special forces dont do things because there easy or id be doing it! We have to remain morally better than our enemies or what are we fighting for?
Tactical.
Not looking straight into the camera !
Edit . His body language says everything 😂.
Snake, do you think human rights can bloom, even on a battlefield?
Subtle burp
British army area waste of money and unfit for service. They cant stop 300.000 rubber boats per year.
Those who break moral law should live in fear forever. Those who've crossed the line, even decades ago, must face judgement.
If you arrest the head of the terrorists and provide him with a lawyer, then in court it may turn out that the terrorist was sponsored by the USA. Therefore, the detention of such people must definitely be illegal.
Bollack
She is talking about the moral duty of an israeli soldier. Ha Ha
He expects terrorists in his study scanning left and right all the time.
What a life.
"Why have we got our hands tied!?....sir." -Gaz, Call Of Duty Modern Warfare.
Unbelievable nonsense
You can engage in spec ops and follow respect basic human rights, claiming anything else is a false dichotomy. We can all chew gum and walk at the same time.
Water walker, you won't win a fight with one hand tied behind your back.
Armchair politics yet again.
Dresden dies not mean that your SAS has the right to be Judge Jury and Executioner.
The SAS were active in Gaza. The RAF were rargeting the Palestinian people and pointing out the areas that the bombs would be most effective.. methink the UK has lost its way years sgo.
And you know this because...?
😂
All soldiers of all countries must be held accountable. The only exception is Israel. Its military can do whatever it wants because they are the sons of God. It is the new commandment that must be obeyed.
Yawn
Yawn
get rid of the traitor Starmer
Go rouge boys 👍
SAS terrorists will be brought to justice one way or another.
Who dares wins 🎉
You want to fight them about it?
🤦♂️
Negative … Leftwing Terrorist
Well if you do not have a code conduct, you knoooow, what will happen, the animal mind, will begin acting on people, it has the mind of about a 7 year old, but it can take you over and you can go all down to living out on the open ground with two main thoughts, food qnd females, and they will doo alllll kinds of things in between. Bowey.
Imagine a football match where one team (let’s call this team SAS) plays by the rules and the other team (let’s call this team terrorist) doesn’t play by the rules, no matter how efficient, well trained & disciplined the SAS may be terrorism will never be eradicated because both teams aren’t competing on a level playing field. The only way to beat terrorism is to either operate outside the rules or create specific rules that are applicable for terrorism to beat them at their own game.
Too many people who have never served in the armed forces think that they have some ideas about combat.
Sometimes you can find yourself fired upon by artillery using anything from phosphorus,anti personnel ( shrapnel) or ' cluster' munitions.
Or very close range hand to hand fighting which might mean the one that is lucky with a knife.
And some ' boffins ' think that they know better how to keep a cool head in such situations.
My answer would be to pull the SAS out of the specialist arena and send in those Boffins!