A big advantage spacex has is the number of engines they produce. Factory production is inherently more reliable. But, the frequency of production also means processes are continuous and refined at a faster rate than infrequent large engine production.
It helps a lot with development, because each engine is essentially disposable until it's actually relied upon for a mission. Pop media likes to make a big deal out of engine explosions, because they're dramatic, but it's fine for an engine to explode during testing when the engine isn't a precious one-off prototype hand-crafted by master fabricators for years.
I really didn't expect to see a private endeavour to develop a space programme in my lifetime. I'm blown away. If someone told me this is where we'd be 10 or 15 years ago I would have just laughed. Just incredible.
@@voldemarvaglaots6690 Did you listen to the video? Because if you did you'd know that's not true. Nasa has nothing like these engines and the Russians even said so smugly because they didn't know about space X's engines. They thought the US would have to use broomsticks and laughed about it when they announced they were cutting the US off from their engines. If you're going to give credit you need to give more credit to the Russians than NASA. That's where the knowledge started for these super engines. A great deal of research and testing went into what they have today. Nothing about it is from NASA. Give credit where it's due. Space X has made some incredible progress that nobody else in the world has been able to make. Artemis illustrates this. It's more of a cash cow of corruption than a rocket. That's obvious. It is still using 1960s era rocket technology. You can't give NASA credit for someone else's achievements when NASA isn't even using it. If NASA were smart they'd incorporate space x's engines on something new and get away from the Artemis project. You could say it's a product of Space X. They'd be using Space X's knowledge.
If this is all NASA then why have they not used it instead of constantly redesigning them to the spending millions? BTW, Musk has stated all designs are open source to all.
The first and most important reason for the reduction in the size of the nozzle was the increased cost of one of materials (niobium?) used in making it. The rest are secondary benefits.
THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS WITH ME. I'M SO GLAD THAT ELON MUSK AND SPACE-X IS ONE OF THE BEST AERO SPACE COMPANIES IN THE WORLD. THANK YOU SPACE-X I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT OTHER INNOVATIONS SPACE-X COMES UP WITH.
I learn a lot from your channel. The detail and the time you spend in detailing the subject you decide that day is priceless. In this case the detail on the Merlin Engine. All the way down to the turbine speed of the pump. That's Great. Thank You for covering the Raptor Engine. I was wondering about that yesterday. You always come though with what I was wondering and beyond. Thank You Very Much. Keep it up! I hope everyone else appreciating the effort you put into your teaching program. It's Great being in your classroom. It's mind blowing how much they have learned from the old Mercury, Gemini, Apollo days. I can't wait to see what you have next.
More clickbait claptrap from Alpha Teck. The only shocking thing here is how he manages to string out a couple of simple facts that have been widely known for months to over 28 minutes.
You're wrong. It's good engineering info, written in a very calm Asian style and voiced in a very cool American accent. Clickbait, sure, but not claptrap. It's legit. It would make sense if you had studied engineering.
Nice job, but there's some technical details wrong in there. You said the Merlin 1D has 1.7 million pounds of thrust, that is no where near correct. Maybe you meant the total thrust from all 9 of them on the Falcon 9. And the RS-25 Space Shuttle engine does not have 2 combustion chambers! That would be the engine you mentioned just before it, the RD-180. Keep up the good work though and maybe just check a few more facts.
I remember the Redstone rocket which fascinated me even more than dinosaurs in childhood. I've followed rocketry and aerospace closely ever sice. Alpha, you guys do a great job! I love the detailed discussion of engine design and the power of continuous improvement. Keep up the good work.
You sound knowledgeable and then drop bits that show you are NOT at all paying attention. When you said that Falcon 9 rockets can be used up to 10 times is one of those moments. You failed to keep up because right now the leading booster has flown 16 times and the next leading booster has 15 flights while SpaceX is saying that they now expect to be able to get 20 flights out of each booster.
Lol, I always get suspicious when a video's title says some country is shocked. You don't think Russia knew all about the Merlin engine? How could any of that be shocking? I get the quest for views but get real.
Jammed with superlatives, this video might serve as a promotional to attract venture capital. Even so, the technical explanations were remarkably clear and well-stated. Your efforts are appreciated-- we subscribed.
Elon / NASA / US Spaceforce should name the 100th flight of a rocket fitted with a SpaceX engine rather than a Russian engine "Broomstick 100" - lol - In yo face Russia!
I am Russian and I am disappointed. I never heard here what exactly should shock us =( We recently tested our new RD-171MV, a four-chamber engine with a thrust of 800 tons - at the moment, this is the most powerful rocket engine in existence. It was created for the new Soyuz-5 rocket. We are also working on the methane engine RD-0169 for the Soyuz-7 - it will be an analogue of the F9, but of the middle class. Work is also underway on the Krylo-SV light launch vehicle. It will be a rocket with a reusable first stage, which has a folding wing. After separation, she sits down like an airplane. We have also been working on the Zeus nuclear tug for many years. So don't worry about us, we're fine =)
Is SpaceX with 6 vacuum raptors on spaceship & central sea level raptors maybe aiming to virtual aerospike. If you think a bit, aim 6 vacuum raptors toward center & use center sea level to create aerospike effect... so creating cone shape virtual exhaust and get some efficiency there as well.
Your right! Russia, and the rest of the world, is SHOCKED at how ALPHA TECH creates its scripts. At least three old scripts clearly were unstapled , thrown in the air, and read as the pages were picked off the floor. At least there wasn't any Delta 5 used in this effort although telling us an RS25 engine has two combustion chamber is an interesting alternative fact. No wonder the Space Shuttle had problems. All pictures clearly show it flew with just 1 1/2 engines. How Humiliating!
Is SpaceX still developing and expanding the Merlin or simply reacting to issues found and fixing them? We always hear about Elon, and he does deserve our praise and admiration. But I was glad you told us about Tom Mueller and his contributions to the Merlin's success. I'm sure that there are a lot of other #2s, true rocket scientists, who don't get the attention that they deserve.
I have been looking forward to seeing a computer create and printed Rocket-assembly, with alot less parts and tubing on it ! The day is finally here, that we can fly..in a Computer designed/invented and printed, rocket ! And, we are able to tell the Computer, to improve upon that design . And then improve the next one too. If we do this, we WILL reach what ever we are working towards....😊👍🏻
You do know that some of us have been following the spece programs from the 1960's, so a lot of what you are presenting as "new" are merely recycled and updated old systems. Technology improves, so old ideas that were not truly feasible due to lack of materials that met the actual conditions found during use, can be retried with newer materials 40-50 years later.
Look at all those carbon emission! Will Elon bring Tesla into Space X and finally give us electric/battery space travel? Now that would surely rock the Russians! They would be sooo jealous!
is SpaceX wants to achieve greatness, then they need to show out with the best would you be the later models and knows probably the Raptors three would be a good place to start. They have more experience building Raptors and it has been streamlined. They can always throttle down a little bit and takeoff so they don’t screw up the pad again. I know his idea is that we won’t have much water on the moon or mars, but the moon is super easy to get off of they could use Chi thrusters of the shot to get off that and there’s much more water on Mars definitely enough to make a deluge system which would also think in the atmosphere! Plus spin prime cash should probably just be vented since it is 40 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. Therefore warming the planet up and creating a thicker atmosphere CO2 is important if you want to get plants growing, which is needed for US! as well as an effective biome, including fungus at some point and carrion eaters herbivores and predators. al gore suggest cows…… good to eat, and them farts man!😱🤪😂😂💯
MERLINS are Great Engines ... Proven Performance to Space & Return. RAPTORS Have Tested Very Well BUT Proven TO-ORBIT & RETURN performance is TO-BE-DETERMINED.
TO ME: ELON MUSK IS.....THE MAN OF THE MINUTE....MAN OF THE HOUR....MAN OF THE DAY....MAN OF THE WEEK....MAN OF THE MONTH.... MAN OF THE YEAR....MAN OF THE DECADE....AND HE WILL BE THE MAN OF THE CENTURY....I LOVE HOW THIS MAN ONLY KNOWS HOW TO MOVE FORWARD....BECAUSE WHEN SOMETHING FAILS....HE LEARNS FORM IT.....FIXES IT....AND THEN...YOU ONLY SEE THIS MAN MOVE STRAIGHT AHEAD.....ALL I SEE HERE....IS ONE MAN WHO WANTS TO ALWAYS DO THE BEST HE CAN.....AND HE DOES IT...
Amusing how Raptor iterations have just cruised past BE-4 in every respect. It's much lighter and with a way smaller form factor and yet is now significantly more powerful. Bozos must despair at times.
this is great to have Raptor and Merlin engines in progress. Could one or both engines be refitting into our moth ball space shuttle and reuse then again with minimum changes and better twin external booster engines power with methane and O2 gas instead of the solid booster rocket engines.. Use of space shuttle to build up new NASA space center where it may be able to have a gas station type for refueling starship and future Dreamliner starship. Contact me if i am wrong or right about this dream in using new engines for the space shuttle and future Starship Dreamliner ships. this is my idea ....
They didn’t shock Russia, it was that Russia miscalculated on desperate the USA was to return to Space with a domestically made engine and rocket to prevent Russia from having a monopoly, with pricing, on Space Travel.
Great video as always, I like learning more about space tech. I'm wondering why the falcon legs deploy like that and how they work, is there like an hydraulic inside the rocket that goes outward? And why did they do it that direction and not extend from the bottom? Is it like a failsafe air-brake that can be used somehow?
As a politically neutral observer, you can see the rhetoric on both sides of the topic. Each one is jabbing at the other while paying no attention to the other's jabs. Grow up! While I like to see the development of space travel and exploration, the idea of colonizing Mars as a kind of "Noah's Ark" to keep mankind from being wiped out by a mass extinction is poppycock.
Imagine how much further we'd have been in space exploration if NASA had stuck to robotic vehicles and leave manned exploration to private enterprise. NASA is still dumping rockets into the ocean after use! How long would it have taken NASA and the legacy aerospace industry to figure out how to safely land and quickly reuse rockets the way Space X has? The Shuttle was a friggen vanity project that stifled most private industry efforts.
Does this guy understand that space x is basically using the blueprint of korolev in Russia during the soviet time to develop the Raptors, merlin engines? Musk himself praised the soviet space program , the Rd70 engines, N1, Mk3. This guy posting this video is ignorant at best or misleading on this topic
Q, why does Elon Musk not invest en develop Professor John Searl of SEG MAGNETICS Magnetic Generator instead of wasting money on fossil feul engins, they flew beyond comprehension in the 1960,s and generated vast kw's of energy back then but we still messing with fossil feul engines. Just imagine the space and weight one can save, with having a magnetic powered spacecraft, no feul, no combustion, negative ion powered, sine waves, no friction, no heat
Congratulations SpaceX team!!!!❤❤❤❤
These are some of the best SpaceX videos I have seen.
The mindset "fail early and often" pays off.
A big advantage spacex has is the number of engines they produce. Factory production is inherently more reliable. But, the frequency of production also means processes are continuous and refined at a faster rate than infrequent large engine production.
44
😊😊😊😊
It helps a lot with development, because each engine is essentially disposable until it's actually relied upon for a mission. Pop media likes to make a big deal out of engine explosions, because they're dramatic, but it's fine for an engine to explode during testing when the engine isn't a precious one-off prototype hand-crafted by master fabricators for years.
I think the biggest advantage is reusability. You can examine engines after every flight.
Excellent video. SpaceX has impressed me more than any other technical endeavor.
I really didn't expect to see a private endeavour to develop a space programme in my lifetime. I'm blown away. If someone told me this is where we'd be 10 or 15 years ago I would have just laughed. Just incredible.
This "project" is all NASA product. All patents are from it, knowledge too.
@@voldemarvaglaots6690 Did you listen to the video? Because if you did you'd know that's not true. Nasa has nothing like these engines and the Russians even said so smugly because they didn't know about space X's engines. They thought the US would have to use broomsticks and laughed about it when they announced they were cutting the US off from their engines.
If you're going to give credit you need to give more credit to the Russians than NASA. That's where the knowledge started for these super engines. A great deal of research and testing went into what they have today. Nothing about it is from NASA.
Give credit where it's due. Space X has made some incredible progress that nobody else in the world has been able to make. Artemis illustrates this. It's more of a cash cow of corruption than a rocket. That's obvious. It is still using 1960s era rocket technology. You can't give NASA credit for someone else's achievements when NASA isn't even using it. If NASA were smart they'd incorporate space x's engines on something new and get away from the Artemis project. You could say it's a product of Space X. They'd be using Space X's knowledge.
If this is all NASA then why have they not used it instead of constantly redesigning them to the spending millions? BTW, Musk has stated all designs are open source to all.
The Falcon 9... aka "America's Broomstick"!😂
I admire what SpaceX has achieved and all, but a few minutes into this video and it feels like I'm watching a SpaceX infomercial.
What a fabulous explanation about state of art and cutting edge technology of SPACE X engines
Excellent stuff bro, keep up your awesome work
The amazing thing is that the engine can withstand. The compression forces between the load and thrust.
The first and most important reason for the reduction in the size of the nozzle was the increased cost of one of materials (niobium?) used in making it. The rest are secondary benefits.
is that similar to Unobtainium?
@@ken-mb5cp only in price
THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS WITH ME. I'M SO GLAD THAT ELON MUSK AND SPACE-X IS ONE OF THE BEST AERO SPACE COMPANIES IN THE WORLD. THANK YOU SPACE-X I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT OTHER INNOVATIONS SPACE-X COMES UP WITH.
First class presentation! Thank you!!!
I learn a lot from your channel. The detail and the time you spend in detailing the subject you decide that day is priceless. In this case the detail on the Merlin Engine. All the way down to the turbine speed of the pump. That's Great. Thank You for covering the Raptor Engine. I was wondering about that yesterday. You always come though with what I was wondering and beyond. Thank You Very Much. Keep it up! I hope everyone else appreciating the effort you put into your teaching program. It's Great being in your classroom. It's mind blowing how much they have learned from the old Mercury, Gemini, Apollo days. I can't wait to see what you have next.
More clickbait claptrap from Alpha Teck. The only shocking thing here is how he manages to string out a couple of simple facts that have been widely known for months to over 28 minutes.
Excellent resource and well presented.
Its all ai generated anymore
Agree. Him and so many others....it does your head in
Thanks for the warning. Moving on.
You're wrong. It's good engineering info, written in a very calm Asian style and voiced in a very cool American accent.
Clickbait, sure, but not claptrap. It's legit. It would make sense if you had studied engineering.
What gets me is how did the dove survive flying so close to the fire from the rocket .
Nice job, but there's some technical details wrong in there. You said the Merlin 1D has 1.7 million pounds of thrust, that is no where near correct. Maybe you meant the total thrust from all 9 of them on the Falcon 9. And the RS-25 Space Shuttle engine does not have 2 combustion chambers! That would be the engine you mentioned just before it, the RD-180. Keep up the good work though and maybe just check a few more facts.
I remember the Redstone rocket which fascinated me even more than dinosaurs in childhood. I've followed rocketry and aerospace closely ever sice. Alpha, you guys do a great job! I love the detailed discussion of engine design and the power of continuous improvement. Keep up the good work.
What do you do with the second stage? Does it stay in space, is it recovered, can anything be used again, besides the first stage..!!
After Elon's many flubs with Tesla's that can't be used in the US economy it is good to see Spacex's many engineering successes.
You sound knowledgeable and then drop bits that show you are NOT at all paying attention. When you said that Falcon 9 rockets can be used up to 10 times is one of those moments. You failed to keep up because right now the leading booster has flown 16 times and the next leading booster has 15 flights while SpaceX is saying that they now expect to be able to get 20 flights out of each booster.
Excelent video and explanation. Thanks for the detailed and well done description .
Congratulations.
So Wise , Thank You . Continuse improvement is good
Great stuff !
really hard to believe how far engins have come, still it's an earthy engine, the best is yet to come
Especially considering the Merlin engine was first used in Spitfires! 🙂
I can't remember this level of clickbait and sensationalist rhetoric before. Are we really stooping to this now? Used to be a cool channel, RIP.
Not much you can do when nothing much is going down at SpaceX, just twiddling their thumbs over the FAA reports and the reliability of Raptor.
Fact check you stats before publishing. The raptor Vac nozzle diameter is not 4 meters. 20:49 mark.
Lol, I always get suspicious when a video's title says some country is shocked. You don't think Russia knew all about the Merlin engine? How could any of that be shocking? I get the quest for views but get real.
Jammed with superlatives, this video might serve as a promotional to attract
venture capital.
Even so, the technical explanations were remarkably clear and well-stated.
Your efforts are appreciated-- we subscribed.
Elon / NASA / US Spaceforce should name the 100th flight of a rocket fitted with a SpaceX engine rather than a Russian engine "Broomstick 100" - lol - In yo face Russia!
I am Russian and I am disappointed. I never heard here what exactly should shock us =(
We recently tested our new RD-171MV, a four-chamber engine with a thrust of 800 tons - at the moment, this is the most powerful rocket engine in existence. It was created for the new Soyuz-5 rocket.
We are also working on the methane engine RD-0169 for the Soyuz-7 - it will be an analogue of the F9, but of the middle class.
Work is also underway on the Krylo-SV light launch vehicle. It will be a rocket with a reusable first stage, which has a folding wing. After separation, she sits down like an airplane.
We have also been working on the Zeus nuclear tug for many years. So don't worry about us, we're fine =)
Кацапоид вернись в палату и прими таблетки
Merlin is a obsolete open cycle engine and Raptor is a unreliable RD-270 copy
clearly clickbait and recycled material from months ago...
watch out for toy drones from Ukraine
Не надо нас успокаивать😂
Орёл тоже строится😂с Володей Роскосмосу пиздец😅
Too bad the thumbnail doesn't say: " Channel Over."
Yesterday your video said the raptor was junk. Now you're postings more click bait.
Is SpaceX with 6 vacuum raptors on spaceship & central sea level raptors maybe aiming to virtual aerospike. If you think a bit, aim 6 vacuum raptors toward center & use center sea level to create aerospike effect... so creating cone shape virtual exhaust and get some efficiency there as well.
I'm going back to plowing my farm with horses because they are cheaper than tractors. Thanks for the advice Space X.
Do as i say- not as i do
Stop ploughing and use chemicals- stop chemicals because you are poisoning us. Ring a bell?
@@charliepyle1626 HAHAHA LOL
Yes plz keep more videos of the wall not scheduled
Your right! Russia, and the rest of the world, is SHOCKED at how ALPHA TECH creates its scripts. At least three old scripts clearly were unstapled , thrown in the air, and read as the pages were picked off the floor. At least there wasn't any Delta 5 used in this effort although telling us an RS25 engine has two combustion chamber is an interesting alternative fact. No wonder the Space Shuttle had problems. All pictures clearly show it flew with just 1 1/2 engines. How Humiliating!
Tom Mueller is interesting. You should do a story on him.
Why not put some Merlin engines with smaller tanks, weight payload capacity by adding them to the Starship. Just a thought.
I FOUND THIS EXCELENT VID , JUST TECNICOL ENOUGH !!!
Some more SpaceX hype.
0:50 because Merlin is Magic...😅❤
The Animinations are Awesome.
Because he steels them from all the YT artists.
Is SpaceX still developing and expanding the Merlin or simply reacting to issues found and fixing them?
We always hear about Elon, and he does deserve our praise and admiration. But I was glad you told us about Tom Mueller and his contributions to the Merlin's success. I'm sure that there are a lot of other #2s, true rocket scientists, who don't get the attention that they deserve.
Elon Deserves no such thing tbh. This channel sims too hard for him as well. Content is good, but the simping should be a lot less.
"We always hear about Elon, and he does deserve our praise and admiration.". Another Elon lickspittle.
@@linaori I disagree with your opinion about Elon but do agree that Alphatech does need to broaden its content. It is too SpaceX oriented.
I have been looking forward to seeing a computer create and printed Rocket-assembly, with alot less parts and tubing on it ! The day is finally here, that we can fly..in a Computer designed/invented and printed, rocket ! And, we are able to tell the Computer, to improve upon that design . And then improve the next one too. If we do this, we WILL reach what ever we are working towards....😊👍🏻
The Falcon 9 is the king 👑 of the skies and outer space. Go Falcon 9.
This in not 5 days old ! Falcon rockets are getting closer to 150 succesful launches ! Recycling old news !
That's because that thing is already there SpaceX have work to do
Very interesting an informative thanks, Michael
Checkout Elon always finds a way to make it better stronger and more economical hes the man!!!
The narrator sounds like Mercer Frey.
good instructors for chainice in next month they will do betar version..
OMG ! ... Like a broken record .........
Tut Tu Ice Cream Ban Phai (Tu Wei) Isaan🇹🇭🙏Everyone who helped to create a new system this time, thank you.😊
You do know that some of us have been following the spece programs from the 1960's, so a lot of what you are presenting as "new" are merely recycled and updated old systems. Technology improves, so old ideas that were not truly feasible due to lack of materials that met the actual conditions found during use, can be retried with newer materials 40-50 years later.
Look at all those carbon emission! Will Elon bring Tesla into Space X and finally give us electric/battery space travel? Now that would surely rock the Russians! They would be sooo jealous!
is SpaceX wants to achieve greatness, then they need to show out with the best would you be the later models and knows probably the Raptors three would be a good place to start. They have more experience building Raptors and it has been streamlined. They can always throttle down a little bit and takeoff so they don’t screw up the pad again. I know his idea is that we won’t have much water on the moon or mars, but the moon is super easy to get off of they could use Chi thrusters of the shot to get off that and there’s much more water on Mars definitely enough to make a deluge system which would also think in the atmosphere! Plus spin prime cash should probably just be vented since it is 40 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. Therefore warming the planet up and creating a thicker atmosphere CO2 is important if you want to get plants growing, which is needed for US! as well as an effective biome, including fungus at some point and carrion eaters herbivores and predators. al gore suggest cows…… good to eat, and them farts man!😱🤪😂😂💯
have come to expect something more than old news clickbait; what's up
not one shocked Russian documented.
MERLINS are Great Engines ... Proven Performance to Space & Return. RAPTORS Have Tested Very Well BUT Proven TO-ORBIT & RETURN performance is TO-BE-DETERMINED.
At 13:04 statement Under $1,000 Per Ton is misspoken. That would be 50 cents per pound. Elon is ambitious, but not crazy. ;-)
Actually, they completed 56 launches since the most recent one was just last night.
TO ME: ELON MUSK IS.....THE MAN OF THE MINUTE....MAN OF THE HOUR....MAN OF THE DAY....MAN OF THE WEEK....MAN OF THE MONTH.... MAN OF THE YEAR....MAN OF THE DECADE....AND HE WILL BE THE MAN OF THE CENTURY....I LOVE HOW THIS MAN ONLY KNOWS HOW TO MOVE FORWARD....BECAUSE WHEN SOMETHING FAILS....HE LEARNS FORM IT.....FIXES IT....AND THEN...YOU ONLY SEE THIS MAN MOVE STRAIGHT AHEAD.....ALL I SEE HERE....IS ONE MAN WHO WANTS TO ALWAYS DO THE BEST HE CAN.....AND HE DOES IT...
Amusing how Raptor iterations have just cruised past BE-4 in every respect. It's much lighter and with a way smaller form factor and yet is now significantly more powerful. Bozos must despair at times.
this is great to have Raptor and Merlin engines in progress. Could one or both engines be refitting into our moth ball space shuttle and reuse then again with minimum changes and better twin external booster engines power with methane and O2 gas instead of the solid booster rocket engines.. Use of space shuttle to build up new NASA space center where it may be able to have a gas station type for refueling starship and future Dreamliner starship. Contact me if i am wrong or right about this dream in using new engines for the space shuttle and future Starship Dreamliner ships. this is my idea ....
They didn’t shock Russia, it was that Russia miscalculated on desperate the USA was to return to Space with a domestically made engine and rocket to prevent Russia from having a monopoly, with pricing, on Space Travel.
Great video as always, I like learning more about space tech. I'm wondering why the falcon legs deploy like that and how they work, is there like an hydraulic inside the rocket that goes outward? And why did they do it that direction and not extend from the bottom? Is it like a failsafe air-brake that can be used somehow?
maybe create a new design…… a smaller pump with more strength, he could call it the “chicken hawk”seriously, have you seen that little guy??!!
As a politically neutral observer, you can see the rhetoric on both sides of the topic. Each one is jabbing at the other while paying no attention to the other's jabs.
Grow up!
While I like to see the development of space travel and exploration, the idea of colonizing Mars as a kind of "Noah's Ark" to keep mankind from being wiped out by a mass extinction is poppycock.
Where is it and how is it flight proven? Potential yes, proven absolutely not!
I DON'T KNOW WHY I FEEL LIKE THIS VIDEO IS JUST THE SAME INFORMATION IN OTHER VIDEOS. IS THE SAME SHIT, JUST TO MAKE US ENTER.
So that's what Putin meant when he appeared on TV last night saying "I'm shocked at what SpaceX just did with the Raptor and Merlin engines".
How do you know the government is lying to you!!!
Because they are allowing more spaceships 🚀
😂😂😂😂😂
Wake up!!!
lol at > 'GAME-OVER'
Elon musk and space x all together and Gorgeous and Right🇺🇸🦋
Imagine how much further we'd have been in space exploration if NASA had stuck to robotic vehicles and leave manned exploration to private enterprise. NASA is still dumping rockets into the ocean after use! How long would it have taken NASA and the legacy aerospace industry to figure out how to safely land and quickly reuse rockets the way Space X has? The Shuttle was a friggen vanity project that stifled most private industry efforts.
Russia built closed cycle methane oxygen engines 40 years ago. As usual SpaceX has stolen and used Russian designs .😮
And for the most failures don't forget And for the most costly project ever in spand I won't be China in Russia.
The engine is not ready. Who was shocked after that?
Алексей я тебя жду надохлсс❤❤ поговорить чтобы ехать вместе в Германию посмотрим сколько там
Does this guy understand that space x is basically using the blueprint of korolev in Russia during the soviet time to develop the Raptors, merlin engines? Musk himself praised the soviet space program , the Rd70 engines, N1, Mk3. This guy posting this video is ignorant at best or misleading on this topic
Nothing new to justify the claim in the title, and very poorly worded nonsense content even for what it is - presumably all generated by Chat GPT.
Elon built a better "broomstick"!
I hope this information is a scam ,because the Chinese will have Merlin rocket engines next week.
Stop with those clickbait titles
It just make me not want to see your videos
Q, why does Elon Musk not invest en develop Professor John Searl of SEG MAGNETICS Magnetic Generator instead of wasting money on fossil feul engins, they flew beyond comprehension in the 1960,s and generated vast kw's of energy back then but we still messing with fossil feul engines. Just imagine the space and weight one can save, with having a magnetic powered spacecraft, no feul, no combustion, negative ion powered, sine waves, no friction, no heat
Don't you know the Russians regret not getting more involved with Elon when he wanted to buy a Russian ICBM. Hahaha....karma.
Посмотреть дом и купить квартиру машину тебе бмв ❤❤
Did they made 100 successful commercial launches in a row? When SpaceX complete, check stats of Roscosmos!
👏🏽
Unsubscribe
Stail
Of course you've learned by now that any video that has "GAME OVER" in the title is pure BS?
LMFAO "shocked" wow everything "shocks" Russia SHOCK must the channels favorite word! Its a click bait word
The video was good. Your points are small.
Russian dont give a f***
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️💪🙏👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍