Supreme Court makes landmark ruling on presidential immunity as part of Trump case
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- Nicole Sganga reports on the landmark presidential immunity ruling by the Supreme Court.
Read more: www.cbsnews.co...
Website: kpix.com/
TH-cam: / cbssanfrancisco
Facebook: / cbssanfrancisco
Instagram: / kpixtv
Twitter: / kpixtv
This isnt good. Im for a smaller government and less government power. This is leaning towards monarchy. Against everything i stand for as a conservative. The gop has gone too far. This is exactly how it becomes fascism.
A little late for smaller government, FDR changed that during the depression. History is very important tool when making fool hardy decisions
Why is Trump trying to get presidential immunity again?
If this was reversed, we would be charging Obama for airstriking a US citizen
You have no idea what you're talking about. This literally protects our government from tyranny.
You lefties are so incompetent it scary !!! The President has the SAME immunities as the rest of congressmen genius !!! WHY SHOULD HE NOT ??? Ed*0^$
Them granting immunity for Trump also grants immunity for our current president. Biden has been given authority to break the law himself.
Thing is hes not the PResident, hes the resident who stole an election
The democrats devious plan ONCE AGAIN, BACKFIRED😂😂😂😂!!!
biden can send seal team six on trump now
🧐The crooked 🤬put them in place for his sht! Thomas BOUGHT and PAID FOR!
Sotomayor needs to comprehend the language a little better. The court is talking about official conduct as President. Keyword being "Official conduct" not any conduct,..."official".
The Supreme Court has no balls.
The SCOTUS cited in closing arguments of the presidential immunities case that Jack Smith was illegally appointed for prosecution of a political opponent.
According to the constitution the General Attorney must use the "offices of law" to create a special council. Merrick Garland didn't do exactly that, he did NOT go through the legislature to create that special council. Instead he appointed a private citizen himself, which is illegal under the constitution according to article 2 section 2 clause 2.
This just keeps getting better by the minute.
Yup…just heard about that. Just goes to show the dems are after Trump.
Garland needs to be held responsible. He is part of the machine. He needs to resign.
"And he (Biden) used the opportunity to take a shot at his rival, Donald Trump" KPIX, you have framed the story as a political horse race, not about what that decision means to the future of our country.
D party is sooo incompetent...
Hooray!!🎉🎉🎉🎉🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
😂🎉
What happened on 1/6? Biden really doesn't understand the ruling.
Thank Jesus for King Trump, only Donald should be above the law, Amen
First v🎉🎉
What a joke this is😢
Way don't close with house fox this problem right new this country it going down to poor in future?
Thank the Cheif Justices for holding up The US Constitution Republic & our Bill of Rights!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂❤
Republican appoints judges are in the rich kings pocket
I think they know a lot more about the constitution than you do.
@@Sadie896 think they are paid off by so of then good old boys boats vacations ect
Terrible
Trump 2024
Lol
😊
The court needs banned
We don't need to ban them, they are the only thing that keeps the Demorcrats from destroying the whole political system.
😂😂😂😂 mmmkay
Long live King JOE!!!