Sennheiser MKH 416 vs. Sennheiser MKE 600

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
  • This is a comparison of two Sennheiser shotgun microphones, the MKH 416 and MKE 600. Enjoy!
    MKE 600 (Amazon) ► amzn.to/1NYiGc9
    MKE 600 (B&H) ► bhpho.to/2cYmoIc
    MKH 416 (Amazon) ► amzn.to/1NYiJoi
    MKH 416 (B&H) ► bhpho.to/2cOIAne
    Mic stand ► amzn.to/2abgtxl
    Shock mount ► amzn.to/29VVugW
    ------
    Get a FREE 30-days of Amazon Prime ► goo.gl/ErUOgC
    ------
    Gear ► tomasvillegas.c...
    ------
    Twitter ► / tomas_villegas
    Google+ ► google.com/+Tom...
    Instagram ► / tomas_villegas
    ------
    Music ►
    Cool Intro - Stings by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (creativecommon...)
    Source: incompetech.com...
    Artist: incompetech.com/

ความคิดเห็น • 303

  • @artysanmobile
    @artysanmobile 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    A very important distinction is that the MKH line uses an RF polarized diaphragm which offers almost complete immunity to moisture problems. It can sit in the rain, which happens far too often with short guns as they are often used for audience pickup. Similar conditions can bring a DC polarized diaphragm mic, such as the MKE mics, to its knees in a minute.

  • @NoahHerman
    @NoahHerman 7 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    I can definitely tell that the MKH416 sounds much richer, and is the clear winner here. However the MKE600 is a close contender. And since I'm on a budget I'm going to pick one up. Wonderful review, subscribed :)

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thank you for stopping in! Glad this helped.

    • @frankiedogturner1516
      @frankiedogturner1516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How can you hear the difference?

    • @BrendanEvan
      @BrendanEvan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@frankiedogturner1516 416 sounds more natural and full to me. MKE600 sounds like you stepped into a slightly smaller room.

    • @michaelrmarak5597
      @michaelrmarak5597 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @NoahHerman ! True, MKH416 is more richer normally. While MKE600 is little dull normally. If you record with modern quality recorder, MKE600 is even better. Reasons for the problem as you said, is: MKE600 has lower gain; while MKH416 has higher. But, if you correct the gain from a modern recorder, you will see richer sound from MKE500. In fact I love MKE600 above MKH416. My Zoom and Yamaha recorders, in combination, give beautiful sound from MKE600. I feel MKH416 is dull compare to MKE600.
      This techniques I learned from Neuman vocal Microphones: TLM102 vs U87 Ai vs TLM106. TLM102 also gives the same beauty out like U87 Ai. This is the reason, I don't consider MKE600 as a low grade mic. Difference is in your hand and experiences.

  • @Dave2D
    @Dave2D 8 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    nice video man. Was interested in both of these

    • @tinashekupfuwa
      @tinashekupfuwa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you were researching for the youtube channel.am I wrong?

    • @samhenderson1684
      @samhenderson1684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow dave is here can’t believe

    • @ezekielakande5501
      @ezekielakande5501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So which did you end up getting?

    • @reckerproduction9468
      @reckerproduction9468 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dave2D being here means this channel is legit

  • @commenter9703
    @commenter9703 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    As everyone said, the 416 is no doubt a cleaner sounding mic. However, the 600 is exceptionally close for just 1/3 of the price, a great value for sure.

    • @readytochop2462
      @readytochop2462 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've had both they're certainly excellent in their own category pricewise.Just sold my 600 to a friend and splurged on the 416. No regrets. Gonna probably have this for a long time.

  • @annekedebruyn7797
    @annekedebruyn7797 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The MKE600 sounds like the 416 without the low end.

    • @Matthew_Raymond
      @Matthew_Raymond 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Basically. I think the MKH 416 has slightly more detail as well, but that’s to be expected give the fact that they’re entirely different classes of microphones at different price points.

  • @Naviral
    @Naviral 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey semper fi brother! This was the exact comparison I was looking for. Funny that its so many years later.

  • @CaptD06
    @CaptD06 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great video Dude, you set a high standard for what a review should be,,clear, concise and to the point.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching Daniel, much appreciated.

  • @kipling1957
    @kipling1957 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The 416 really grabs the voice and is full sounding - this is my preference if price was no object. The 600 sounds thinner somehow, yea, but nice that it can be battery powered. You mentioned that the 416 needs a recorder. The issue is that it needs phantom, which could come from a small mixer, like Juice-link, Beachtek, MixPre-D etc (not necessarily a recorder). I think you know that - I'm just clarifying for anyone that might not. Great little comparison. Thanks for putting it up.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Appreciate the feedback, thank you for taking the time to comment.

  • @HippieMagic
    @HippieMagic ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I went with the 600 for flexibility. My camcorder could easily work with the 416 but my other cameras would be better served by the 600. After looking through all the different options in the $300 range for camera mics it seems like the 600 comes out on top in most of the comparisons.
    I will probably get a 416 at some point, they do sound great, but the 600 seems like the best all around option right now.

  • @TheRetroFuture
    @TheRetroFuture 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent video! I went with the 600. Thank you!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great choice. Thanks for the comment 🤝

  • @canoopsy
    @canoopsy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing video Tomas! Really solid comparison of the two mics

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Canoopsy thank you my friend!

  • @blazingdan
    @blazingdan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Good video. That 600 is just soo good at that price point. Blows the 1, 2 and 4 Rodes away in my opinion. The 416 is clearly a premium product, but the 600 is still so good and so versatile.

  • @DavidHarry
    @DavidHarry 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is an excellent review and demonstration of both mics. I'm especially impressed by the fact that you give the 600 a totally unbiased test. I use a bunch of Sennheisers and although I don't have the 600, I wouldn't think twice about using it for serious dialogue in certain scenarios after listening to your review.
    I bet if you had have done this as a blind test that many people wouldn't have been able to tell what mic was what. That's not to say that the 416 isn't a better mic in most ways, which I think would become more evident when recording dialogue from a distance in a more testing environment, plus it's also built like a tank. But you've proven just how good a lower cost shotgun can be.
    The one point you made very clear about the 600, which is something that can't be overlook or understated, is its self powering ability. Outside of a well equipped shoot, most people simply won't be using a phantom preamp, camera with phantom or external phantom recorder. You simply can't beat plugging a self powered mic straight into a camera for simplicity and ease of use, as long as the camera has an OK mic input. This is where the 600 is a real winner.
    Again, excellent video. Thank you.
    Cheers, Dave.

  • @BrendanEvan
    @BrendanEvan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    MKH416 just sounds perfect IMO

  • @grahamtobias902
    @grahamtobias902 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks Tomas, I've used the 416 a lot at work and it is great but I didn't pay for that! The MKE 600 really does sound good too for the price.

  • @RoySFord
    @RoySFord 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love this comparison between these two. I bought the MKE600 because my budget was short of the MKH416 mic. I've been using the mic mainly for Voice Overs. With in a month I was able to recoup my investment into the MKE600. Thanks!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They're both great mics and you can't lose buying either. Thanks for the comment.

  • @JamesonsTravels
    @JamesonsTravels 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good work devil dog. Keep getting after it. New audio nut here.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the comment. 🤝

  • @harrypehkonen
    @harrypehkonen 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Exactly what I was looking for! Thanks for doing the off-axis samples.

  • @panmaew
    @panmaew 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Besides sounding fuller, the MKH 416 clearly has more sensitivity as well (assuming the gain level is equal which seems to be the case).

  • @petermeier1910
    @petermeier1910 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, great review, thanks! One little note, though.... even semi professional video cameras can handle both mics because they have 48 volts phantom power mic inputs.

  • @PaulMDiaz
    @PaulMDiaz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great job! Just picked up the 600 for $250

  • @michaelsilvey1230
    @michaelsilvey1230 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video, thanks.. ya a bit late to this party. Just a comment to those who have said "i can't hardly tell the difference" ...going with the 600. Although Tomas made if very clear, different mics, 416 is superior..etc.... what you don't see (er..hear) is this is a controlled easy to record environment.... if you get into more challenges, noisy outdoors, concrete hallways, etc......the 416 will provide you with usable audio everytime... there is a reason it costs 3x. Just trying to help! :)

  • @ytsejam58
    @ytsejam58 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I learned that the MKH 416 are the mics the Game Grumps use to record audio. Probably why I love listening to their show so much. They have two of them for both hosts. I am looking to get one to do audio for a friend of mine who makes videos. But $1000 is a lot to drop on my smaller budget. Especially with all the accessories I need to get with it. The pole, the blimp, and the coat.

  • @storyfrontier
    @storyfrontier 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    would have been useful to hear them side-by-side, one after the other. So we can A, B the differences more clearly. Maybe i missed when you did it, but other than that, thanks for the review.

  • @ww1www
    @ww1www 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I watched (and listened to) a zlllion comparisons and reviews. The Rode NTG3 always made me cross all other shotgun mikes out of my list. Until I heard the MKH416... and then I found the MKE600. I have to admit I cannot hear that much of a difference between these two. So negligible difference in sound quality that made it clear to me that the MKE600 is what I need for my non-pro usage. I only tried it indoors yet, and it sounds fantastic to my untrained ears. Thanks for the review, it helped me a lot.

  • @BenPatrik
    @BenPatrik 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Still relevant in 2024! I’m getting the 416 because of this video. Yes, it’s a lot more expensive and I’ll need a blimp, pole, and field recorder and my bank account will hate me, but it’s worth it for that low end and sensitivity

  • @caseyholford
    @caseyholford 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great video. I own a 416 myself and love it but was just putting a field kit together for work and opted to get 2x MKE 600s for their versatility. You've shown here that the voice quality is also really good for the price!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad this helped you in some way. Thanks for the comment.

  • @JoshuaStancea
    @JoshuaStancea 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    416 is hotter, slightly more depth. Other than that, very similar sound

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed, that's why I love it so much.

  • @BrianEason_DoingitwithGod
    @BrianEason_DoingitwithGod 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MKH-416 does sound fuller compared to the MKE 600. But the difference can be fixed in post with the proper mixing. I would love to have the MKH-416 but I think I'm going to go with the MKE-600 and see what I get running it into my Zoom F8N. Thank you!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 600 is an amazing microphone.

  • @MatthewChenDirector
    @MatthewChenDirector 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think the “depth” has to do more with a difference in the microphones sensitivity. The 416 is a more sensitive microphone and it seems like there is an obvious change in volume during the change over. If you increase the volume during the 600 portion they sound very similar

    • @antdx316
      @antdx316 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      so if you move it closer and/or increase the gain then they would sound the same?

  • @snazzy
    @snazzy 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice sounding mics. Interested to see how my modded Rode will sound. Decided not to go with a shotgun mic since most audio buffs say shotguns are a no-no indoors; however, since it's a directional condenser, I'm worried I'll have to sound treat my room quite a bit more. The sound is way more natural, however. Great video, Tomas.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      My audio guy says different, shotguns are great for indoors as long as you're okay with room noise. Making shotgun mics really good for recording bands and stuff playing together. I did no sound treatment to my space and I'm really happy with the results. Thanks for stopping by Quinn, have fun at CVS!

    • @marcrestorations492
      @marcrestorations492 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      As long as the rooms sound treated then it's fine. Really depends on what your using it for. Same with speakers. Changes alot with what your rooms is.

  • @PremierReviewer
    @PremierReviewer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man I would like to get my hands on these both :) another informative video man👍

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks bro, I appreciate the love!

  • @DesertCookie
    @DesertCookie 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    To connect the MKE 600 to a camera with only a 3.5mm input you can use the Sennheiser KA 600. There even is a KA 600i that exposes a TRRS connection instead of TRS and thus allows for direct connection with phones and such. At around 20€ both of these adapters are about half the price Rode asks for their XLR to 3.5mm adapters.

  • @dasi66
    @dasi66 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Re: condenser mics and 48volt power: One should note that the 416 can be plugged directly into cameras that supply 48volt mic power. There probably are not any DSLR cameras that provide 48volt mic power... But there are audio input devices available for DSLR cameras that do supply 48volt mic power. One should also that the 416 has been in use for decades , and there are many older models that use 12volt "T" power.
    They are not going to work unless you have a "T" slower supply- (in case you're looking at buying an older mic).

  • @BravingTheOutDoors
    @BravingTheOutDoors 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm from England and the price difference is quite high.
    Roughly £800 for the 416 (though you can find it for £680 second hand) and £250 for the 600.
    My favourite mic (which I don't own!!!) is the 416. I honestly think it's the best mic in the world. I've worked with many Neumann U87's and I honestly prefer the 416.
    Unfortunately the 600 just doesn't sound the same at all. As you said, it's a great mic and it is flexible and for what it is and how it works it's great for the price but for vocals only I prefer the Blue Spark which is even half the price of the 600.
    This is a good review but I wish you've made sample to sample comparison because that would make it even better.

  • @RobLevel
    @RobLevel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making this my g

  • @HeathcliffBlair
    @HeathcliffBlair 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice video. Thanks. I'm pretty late to the game here, but I might advise that if you use post EQing, you may get the 600 to within 90% of the 416 if you boost the lows/low-mids, cut the upper mids, and boost the highs all by between 3 and 5 db. Experiment! I have neither mic actually, BUT I just tried those EQ settings on the sound of this video - so it's not exactly scientific, but an interesting result. Cheers. 🙂

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for commenting and watching 🤝

  • @stevenswancoat1150
    @stevenswancoat1150 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A couple things... One, when you were recording the two mics, I have to agree the 418 sounds more full. Take a look at the audio meter behind you (him), on the 416 its constantly going over the threshold bar and almost into the red. If you look at the 600 it barley makes it to the bar. Also this video and many more should have more outdoor testing of mics, also with and without the blimp and in wind. (Now I and I am not an audio guy) but most on quiet indoor sets will go with a condenser mic, obviously there are exceptions, however indoor testing may become a mute point for these shotgun mics. With that all said, This video and a few others led me to get the 600 over the 416. The real decision maker for me was I shoot on gh4. Now although i would use external pre-amp w xlr attached, its gives me that flexibility in a tight situation to record great audio direct into the GH4. Question now is it worth it to get both?

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I still have and use both. They are both awesome mics.

  • @chapstyleusa476
    @chapstyleusa476 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    man i ve watched tons of videos about them but yours is the one that really helped to make the right choice!

  • @ratt57
    @ratt57 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Tomas, I know this was shot in 2016, but thanks for it! I have the 600 and have been debating on upgrading to the 416... after watching your review, I think I'm better just keeping what I have!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like both of these mics and still use them to this day. I love my 416 tho and would definitely pick it over the 600. 👍

  • @AtomicusPrime
    @AtomicusPrime 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy crap, a clean room in a microphone review/comparison. You rock just for that! Thanks for review.

  • @petestyles8911
    @petestyles8911 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video, I have just ordered a 416 looking forward to get it now!

  • @randomperson65
    @randomperson65 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the main difference should be in maximum recording distance. If you are filmmaker and shoot outdoors, you need to place your mic further, so your sound recording field should be more narrow, and probably 416 suits better for this situation. Unfortunately this test can not answer this question.

  • @ajryangameaudio
    @ajryangameaudio 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Tomas, looking at both of these so this helps so much!

  • @biscuitranchproductions4946
    @biscuitranchproductions4946 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just got an MKE-600 last week. Fantastic microphone!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a great microphone.

    • @biscuitranchproductions4946
      @biscuitranchproductions4946 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TomasVillegas Agreed, used it on a Zoom meeting. I can tell it is going to get a lot of use!

  • @Tnilge
    @Tnilge 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    3 years late but this vid sold me on the mke 600. thanks for a great review!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the awesome comment 🤝

    • @zackpercellvo7923
      @zackpercellvo7923 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you still liking the 600? I'm seriously considering it.

  • @REFITSTUDIOS
    @REFITSTUDIOS 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    416 has the edge in quality but 600 has the portability w/ the battery. personally own the 600 and I'm loving it :)

  • @armchairpilot7641
    @armchairpilot7641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man the 416 sounds so rich. What a great microphone. But for about $700 less, the MKE 600 is a STEAL. definitely not as rich/full as the 416, but nothing a little EQ in post can't fix! ;) Great review. Would love to own both.

  • @ojbravo
    @ojbravo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tomas!!! Doing some research on MKE 600 when I found this video... Great work! You're no joke! Thanks bro.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Omar Bravo hopefully this helped, good to see you around!

    • @JoshuaStancea
      @JoshuaStancea 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      This video was the reason I went with the 600

  • @michaelforras
    @michaelforras 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Semper Fi brother! Great video! MSG 07’-10’!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Semper Fidelis, 2005-2008👍

  • @JasenRitt
    @JasenRitt 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really awesome Review Tomas.. There is considerable difference between the two mics.. Both mics are fantastic!! Great video as always

  • @lhumoureur3642
    @lhumoureur3642 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this video, I dont speak great English well but I understand the explanation of the microphone, thank you.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching, glad it helped.

  • @pauldefaire
    @pauldefaire 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jeez, the 600 sounds really thin in comparison. Nice video!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree. Thanks for the comment 🤝

  • @Chasjazzez
    @Chasjazzez 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The MKE 600 sounds on it's own very good, but after listening to the MKH416 it sounds very nasal.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 416 is unbeatable in my own opinion.

    • @Chasjazzez
      @Chasjazzez 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TomasVillegas Yes, I did a lot of study... But I will buy the MKH416

    • @DRcozmo-km9er
      @DRcozmo-km9er 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You nailed the expression

  • @simon.vespers
    @simon.vespers 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    he looks like G-Eazy lol ! Great video btw

  • @SophieGotraceMusic
    @SophieGotraceMusic 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks you for helping me choose the best microphone for my vlogs. I will let you know once I get it.

  • @lucem14
    @lucem14 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, thanks for this video! What do you think about the ME66+K6 vs MKE600? I'm confuse because the ME66+K6 is more expensive than MKE600 and I have the impression that the MKE600 have a better quality ..

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not sure never used the ME66. I can say I still use the MKE600 on all of my projects where I need to use a shotgun mic outside of the studio.

  • @IntheDAW
    @IntheDAW 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really am supersized at the quality of the 600

  • @rosselur
    @rosselur 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    every once in a while when i google mics, i come across "compeer"-guy. awesome.

  • @sojournerfornow
    @sojournerfornow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sennheiser was way head of you. The MKH416T features a battery box with LF rolloff... this was the standard film sound set up when Nagras ruled. Easily converted to 48 phantom with an inline XLR adapter. This has been my setup for decades, and I still have yet to find a mic that's better for many VO assignments and instrument tracks. And you can buy the T on the used market for quite a bit less than the U version...

  • @junecrisfrye
    @junecrisfrye 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree the MKE-600 is budget friendly close a little to 416. I could not find really different on both of two. much better if real world action so it can really find the difference. anyway a good way to introduce these microphone's

  • @TWESHELLSHOCKR
    @TWESHELLSHOCKR 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just by adding some compression and eq you can match the 416 with the 600 in post. Just make sure you really have some dope plug ins.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct. The 600 is really great 👍

    • @TWESHELLSHOCKR
      @TWESHELLSHOCKR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TomasVillegas It blew me away on the quality it pulled off. Combined with the Tascam DR-70D 4track audio recorder

  • @pitbox6497
    @pitbox6497 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's impressive. The 416 is over £700 right now, and the 600 is £200... and I very nearly couldn't tell the difference. Whatever the difference is, it's not worth an extra £500 to me!

    • @Yer_Da_
      @Yer_Da_ 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      There a lot less lower mid and bass in the 600, probably due to its wider polar pattern - the 416 will benefit from proximity effect with it's tighter polar pattern, emphasising bass frequencies. I'm impressed with the 600 though.

  • @yoshiakiimahori
    @yoshiakiimahori 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @rokcomt
    @rokcomt 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The MKH416 polar patter in super-cardioid/lobar...

  • @itry1178
    @itry1178 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video, are you able to do over the head (Out of Camera View) shots? So we can hear what it sounds like when the microphone isn't view-able to the camera.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +I Try pretty much all of my videos after this are with the 416 or 600.

  • @darrelking6647
    @darrelking6647 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 600 (which I have) is thinner but probably the more accurate of the two. While I might use the 416 for voiceovers, the 600 is probably the best for all around use.
    Thanks for this video, yes it was very useful.

  • @9i31df3fgf2d
    @9i31df3fgf2d 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would love to hear your thoughts on the differences in noise floor, and handling noise.

  • @nepomukism
    @nepomukism 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not really sure what you mean by "Its Phantom powered SO you NEED an external recorder". Regarding cameras, every professional digital cinema camera supports phantom power. Apart from that, professional film audio recording is always an external recorders to be independent on where the mic and the recorder stands in the field. So if you refer to semi professional equipment you should mention that. The Sennheiser MKH 416 is film set standard. And phantom powered microphones tend to grab more detail.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      DSLR and mirror less do not provide power is what I was talking toward.

  • @Verichai
    @Verichai 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Phenomenal review. Short, informative and clear. Thanks.

  • @ntd2776
    @ntd2776 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work, as always, Tomas!

  • @bettonektp2379
    @bettonektp2379 ปีที่แล้ว

    im listening trough my Apollo twin X interface and trough my ATH-M50X headphones and damn boy u can definitely hear the difference in the lows.The MKH-416 is definitely better.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's still my favorite microphone. 👊

  • @UzairSipra
    @UzairSipra 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish if you could show a comparison on-location, outdoor with dslr. still appreciate for the video. thanks.

  • @c2aus319
    @c2aus319 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i was living a lie using this mic from the side like a podcast mic ;))))
    love you man
    keep on crushing!

  • @SolidBrixStudios
    @SolidBrixStudios 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much!

  • @thestingyham1188
    @thestingyham1188 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you have the low cut filter on the 600 at the time? It sure sounded like it.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe I did. This was filmed a long time ago.

  • @ChrisRuggiero
    @ChrisRuggiero 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good comparison. Thanks for making this

  • @woolyimage
    @woolyimage 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just bought a 600 for my camcorder ( which has phantom power) but considering a 416 for boom work.

  • @johannjacobdedios7636
    @johannjacobdedios7636 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I connect the mke 600 to my rodecaster pro, would I pull off the sound of the 416 by add the effects?

  • @thenannymoh
    @thenannymoh 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! this really helps my buying decision!

  • @brentsands6188
    @brentsands6188 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question. When you say the MKH 416 needs and external recorder to go mobile. I will be using a Zoom H4n to plug in the mic. Will that be enough for the 416 or do I need another device for power???

  • @robwasnj
    @robwasnj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Solid comparison, I was hoping the 600 sounded just as good but it definitely does not. I guess you do get what you pay for.

  • @TechFit360
    @TechFit360 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always enjoy your videos man! The MKE 600 would be just find! (within my Budget) Thumbs up!!!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 600 is a legitimate mic, I love both of them. Thanks man!

  • @skuitert9993
    @skuitert9993 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for all the great reviews Tomas! I'm interested in whether you prefer using sennheiser shotgun microphone like the mkh416/mke600 or a Sennheiser AVX Lavalier system which you reviewed earlier for general use. I'll be getting either the shotgun or the avx, which do you recommend?

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Wizzy Videos I use both pretty frequently. They both have their use cases, and it's all dependent on the environment. I will say the MKE-600 is a really great all around mic.

  • @JoeCastellon
    @JoeCastellon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I might get the MKE 600 soon, but I'm still torn between this and the AT 897

  • @GinGinster
    @GinGinster 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I absolutely loved this video, keep it up.

  • @Jarhead6
    @Jarhead6 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    great vid man!

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Jarhead6 thanks brother! Happy new year!

    • @Jarhead6
      @Jarhead6 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tomas Villegas Happy New Year!

  • @91darko
    @91darko 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are there any sound/voice distortions from 40-50cm away and 30 degrees axis on Sennheiser MKH 416?

  • @ameeromedia5883
    @ameeromedia5883 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent, straight to the point!

  • @soldermecold7456
    @soldermecold7456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Appreciate the video… would be nice to see a more active A B A B A B comparison to get some back to back samples :)

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the suggestion 👍

  • @gnomehanslan1430
    @gnomehanslan1430 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ofcourse the 416 wins, but quite a few people don't understand the value in which the MKE 600 gives. I mean, if you think about it, if you're upgrading from, lets say, a $100-200 shotgun mic, the MKE 600 is one of the few clear upgrades over it, honestly... its just that the upgrade for that is the MKH 416 until its beaten by another shotgun mic.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely. The MKE 600 is a great value.

  • @Paul2koo
    @Paul2koo 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. So I have the Zoom H4N Pro and right now I'm getting my gear ready before next year to do my first ever serious short film. So the question is, what do you recommend for the best dialog shot gun microphone? The MKH 416 or the MKE 600? Both microphone's sound amazing, but I wanna make sure I get the most bang for my buck. Any Info would help.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The 416 is my favorite microphone and is my go to for almost all my projects.

  • @africanhistory
    @africanhistory 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have never understood what is so special about the MKH 416 , sounds like part of the mid is missing.

  • @153grover
    @153grover 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    MKE 600 keeps looking better and better. For the price it's a great one to get.

    • @TomasVillegas
      @TomasVillegas  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes the 600 is an awesome microphone.

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That's a great price

  • @premiumparis
    @premiumparis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone tried the ME66/K6 ? How does it compare to the MKE600 ? I think it’s a bit of a step up ?! Because I can’t seems to find a MKE600 used at a good price but I did find some ME66 with K6 for less ...

  • @danieltx7066
    @danieltx7066 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a pair of hyper corduroy pants… gotta drop the gain when i enter the room.
    thanks for the review, but please check your 2-5kHz levels. this audio hurt some.

  • @FindingTrueFreedom
    @FindingTrueFreedom 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 416 sounds beautiful!

  • @kingkapowable
    @kingkapowable 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally got a 416 after a few years on the 600. For me it's chalk and cheese! 416 is the cheese! :-)

  • @ThisHandleIsInteresting
    @ThisHandleIsInteresting 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would the 600 also be great for voice over? Does it share the same audio muscularity in bringing presence to male voices as the 416 does for vo work?

    • @Gojanel
      @Gojanel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.