Murderer or Loyal Uncle? History Documentary & Facial Reconstructions | Royalty Now
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
- Go to our sponsor betterhelp.com/royaltynow for 10% off your first month of therapy with BetterHelp and get matched with a therapist who will listen and help.
Full Wars of the Roses history: • The True Story That Be...
0:00 Early Life
5:47 George’s Betrayal
7:26 Coming to Power
19:11 What Happened to the Princes?
21:38 What did Richard & the Princes Look Like?
25:13 Re-creations Revealed
Find us here:
Instagram: @Royalty_Now_
RoyaltyNowStudios.com
The story of Richard III and the Princes in the Tower is one of the notorious mysteries in English history. Was Richard a tyrant who killed his nephews, or an innocent, believing he was simply the best candidate to take the throne? Today, we’ll walk you through Richard’s history, as well as go over some theories of what happened to the princes.
I wanted to make a re-creation of Richard, who we have more information on. But, I also wanted to give the boys a face, even though source material for their appearances is next to none.
Let’s start with Richard - there are no portraits of Richard surviving today that were made in his own lifetime. However, unlike the princes, researchers have located the lost body of Richard III, which allowed us to get a glimpse of the real man that we don’t get with other monarchs.
Phillipa Langley is the founder of the Richard III society and the main driving force behind the amazing discovery of Richard’s body under a parking lot in Leicester in 2012. This allowed researchers to learn more about Richard’s true appearance, and settle some long-held disputes.
Through genetic analysis, the University of Leicester team determined that he had a 96% chance of having blue eyes, and a 77% chance of having blonde hair, at least in childhood.
This allowed them to tell which portrait of Richard was the most accurate, and it seems to be the earliest version found - this arched portrait made about 30-40 years after his death shows Richard with light eyes and medium-brown hair. This portrait is widely thought to have been copied from one made during his lifetime.
Before the discovery of his body, part of Richard’s legacy had been that he was an evil hunchback with a withered arm - this was mostly spread by Thomas More, who was only 8 years old when Richard died, and was a biased source who had a vested interest in making the Tudor line look more secure.
The researchers found that Richard did have pretty severe scoliosis - in real life this would cause a slight asymmetry, with the left shoulder being held higher than the right. But nothing so severe that it would cause a hunchback or a withered arm, like the rumors spread after his death.
The researchers also found that his bones were quite delicate, which matches up with contemporary accounts that he was a small man, who was surprisingly good in battle despite appearing feminine, in their words.
On the skeleton, there are 8 minor wounds from various weapons and 2 fatal blows at the base of the skull, which aligns with the accounts that he died in the middle of a group of attackers after being de-horsed in battle.
Craniofacial expert Caroline Wilkinson worked on a 3D model of Richard III, which I’ll also reference in my re-creation. In my depiction I’m going to try and kind of thread the needle between the most accurate portrait, and the forensic reconstruction, since the two do have some differences.
Now, let’s talk about the Princes - and this is where it gets more difficult.
For young Edward V, at do have one likeness - this one, from an illuminated manuscript translated by Edward’s guardian and uncle, Anthony Woodville. There is also this stained glass depiction, made after Edward’s death in the 1500s (sparkypus.com/2020/12/26/a-po....
And of course numerous artistic depictions and portraits from centuries much later: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
So, what we do know is this: Edward V was a blonde boy of twelve, and that’s about it. It’s reasonable to guess that his younger brother Richard, who was 9 at the time, might look similar to him.
I’ve made some fully artistic depictions of the boys based on the single portrait we have, as well as the features of their relatives.
Some common York facial characteristics were these narrow eyes, solid jaw with strong chin, long straight nose, and medium to small lips. Their parents are both brown or hazel-eyed, so it’s likely they were as well. I’ve essentially borrowed some features from each parent.
So, while the Richard III re-creation is fully grounded in reality, the re-creations of the boys are just artistic, and meant to honor their memory.
This video creation and final image are ©Royalty Now. - บันเทิง
Thank you all so much for watching! Go to our sponsor betterhelp.com/royaltynow for 10% off your first month of therapy with BetterHelp and get matched with a therapist who will listen and help.
Oh you're a Cyclone! That's cool. I'm a Hawkeye.
What a beautiful and talented lady you are my dear 😍. Love from India.
There is a burial effigy of Edward and Elizabeth's daughter (Elizabeth of York) which might have been based on her death mask. She was the mother of Henry VIII. Maybe you can cover her next.
Could you do a video on Jeanne-Antoinette Poisson or as she is more famously known as Madame de Pompadour and how she went from Mistress to advisor to the French King Louis XV
You simply have no idea ideas what you’re talking about.
My heart breaks for these two young, innocent boys! What a tragic end! 😭
We don’t know how they ended. The evidence shows it was not in the Tower.
@@nbenefiel What evidence are you talking about? The only evidence I saw was two young skeletons found in the stairwell. Did we watch the same video?
Then where ?
@@roses7017, the skeletons have been pretty much ruled out. The location where they have been discovered, isn't really compatible with the idea that they are the remains of the two boys which have been hidden away quickly. They were buried far too deeply for being relics of the late Middle Ages, and it would not have been possible to dig such a deep hole without anyone wondering what was going on there. And if the princes have been killed, it would've been much easier to get rid of the bodies if the boys were killed outside of the Tower. But even if the skeletons are the remains of the two kids, this doesn't tell us who killed them, when it happened and who gave the order!
@@lawrencejames8011 ??
I am never disappointed. Your narration, the details, the music and of course your recreations. Fantastic! Thank you!
Thank you very much!
👍👍👍
Without faces, these little kids were no more than a passing footnote or a tragic ghost story. What you did was make them real to us, which makes them matter. Though it's been hundreds of years since they died, these children once had people who must've loved them. It's so painful to hear how unfairly they were robbed of their lives. Thank you for doing this for them 🙏You may have made fully artistic interpretations based on as much information as you could gather, but still you gave these boys their dignity back. This is one of the reasons why I love your channel so much. Keep up the amazing work!
I burst into tears seeing the boys come to life. It's so easy to relegate them to another ghost story, another tragedy of history, but to see two clear products of their parents just makes their story so sickeningly real. Richard is so easy to paint as The Bad Guy, and he absolutely was, but seeing him here, seeing the smile, it breaks my heart that such a devoted brother could turn into a monster, because whether directly or indirectly, those boys died because of him. History became horribly, horribly real in this one. I feel like I just watched an unnecessarily gruesome true crime documentary.
Yes, it is a heart breaking tale. Richard was devoted to his brother and I think would have been a good protector had the Woodvilles worked with him rather than hiding his brothers death from him. So preventable had Edward IV let Richard raise his heir and they would have forged a working relationship. I don’t excuse Richard’s probable guilt - whether direct or through Buckingham - but in his mind he was protecting his wife and child, he thought the Woodvilles would destroy him and his family and take their lands. I wonder how many parents, when choosing between saving their own child or saving a niece or nephew, would choose differently to Richard.
This one also made me feel very emotional. Seeing the two young princes come to life. So sad!
me too, its so sad, those poor boys.
So true! So sad!
There’s no evidence they were murdered.
Breathtaking work! It’s eerie to see Richard III looking so handsome. But your recreation is so realistic given the sources, I just never saw it before.
The beautiful princes, as you see them, are such a realistic blend of their parents, it brings a tear. And even after hundreds of years, a prayer for this family, entrapped in the tragedies of power, like many of Ancient Rome. Thank you for a fascinating presentation!
The Richard re-creation shares a lot of similarities with Edward IV, it looks great. It’s so emotional seeing the boys with “real” faces.
It's not surprising that Edward IV and Richard have somewhat similar faces. They are brothers 😊
That was the most realistic painting of a monarch I’ve ever seen. It was remarkably close to reality.
Wow, this is amazing. Your work is magnificent. I think this might be one of my favorite re-creations from you (alongside Helena of Troy, Anne Boleyn and the emperess Livia).
I was never a fan of the blond depictions of Richard III but this nails it perfectly. And I think it's the most plausible hair color for Richard since it's so common that blond children end up with light/medium brown hair, and also matches with the other portraits that portray him with slightly darker hair as well. It's interesting that his eyes ended up kinda similar to Aneurin Barnard's eyes (I got familiar with his story through The White Queen tv show).
Thank you! I agree, I don’t see him in my mind as being a light blonde (of course it’s possible), I see him as a light brown. Glad you enjoyed it!
I thought of Aneurin as well!
Richard was supposed to have dark brown hair, like his father.
I'm not sure if it's just my own weird taste, but your version of Richard is very handsome. 😅 The eyes are mesmerizing, very sad... I do feel sympathy for the lack of medical knowledge of his conditions, and the lack of empathy that brought to him.
And lord knows he wouldn't be the first royalty to kill his own kin for the throne. Why his actions are "special", to make him the "evil hunchback of England", I have no idea. The power of Tudor propaganda, I guess.
Thank you for this video! Absolutely loved it. ❤
Shakespeare's depiction of him didn't help his reputation through history either. I agree, he is very handsome.
He lost his son and his wife within a year. I think he was very sad.
@@nbenefielit was also have been seen as punishment from God for those who believed he had murdered his nephews. Bosworth was his Hail Mary & he lost. They would’ve had to prize that crown out of his cold dead hands it’s the only way he was ever giving it up! There’s no way he was ever going to be held accountable for the nefarious circumstances that lead to him becoming king. If he had no hand in killing those boys he was the unluckiest medieval king ever
I have scoliosis, and I always hated the fact people demonised Richard III for that. Made me feel really self-conscious tbh.
Anyway, amazing reconstruction and great historitcal retelling as always!
Exactly! They shouldn't demonize him for his supposed appearance, but for the most likely fact that he killed off his two nephews when his brother, who had so much trust in him, hoped he would raise like his own but only the opposite occured.
Shakespeare’s Richard III is great art but contains not a shred of historical truth. Blatant Tudor propaganda
It is sad just how uneducated, ignorant and foolish people were back then. It's really ridiculous to us now that they actually believed some of the the things they did because we are much more advanced and wiser to know better now . Don't let it bother you Roxanewolfie because it's coming from a less evolved and enlightened time when most people couldn't even read or write so they could easily be ruled by fear and superstition.
I agree, people with disabilities or deformities are still the bad ones. The evil was not Richard, the new evidence says the contrary
@@cisio64123i have to say I disagree. Many people were highly educated. Of course many people were not, but the nature of propaganda is not any different then, then it is today. Richard’s Scoliosis did not stop him from riding, fighting and leading an army. Plenty of fear and superstition can be observed in people living today.
I think your facial reconstruction of Richard III is excellent and much truer to his portrait than the previous reconstruction done over his skeleton was. Also you did did a great job with his possible smile, I think your image was very realistic based on his facial structure.
It seems far more likely that Richard had them killed. There would always be far too many who would rally behind the princes and neither he or his throne would be secure as long as they lived. Richard had absolutely nothing to gain and far too much to lose to allow them to live . He simply couldn't have taken the chance in sparing them.
I dont know. The Ottoman Empire dealt with princes similar by just locking them up in towers and letting them degenerate and live like vegetables. No one can rallye behind long forgotten and locked up vegetables. With all the intrigues and coups happening all over the place there are just so many interested parties.
@@kleinerprinz99 Actually that is not entirely true. The Ottoman Empire had a more infamous code of a new Sultan ordering the deaths of his brothers immediately upon his ascension to the throne so they couldn't be a threat to him. Few Sultan's would spare their brothers as they knew the price could be their own death by the very sibling they had spared. The Sultan's were also infamous in ordering the death's of their own son's if they seemed to be becoming too popular and gaining enough support to potentially oust them. Mary Queen of Scots famously had to be executed by Elizabeth I because she posed a threat to her with plots being hatched in her name even though Mary was imprisoned . If a figure is known to be alive at all and there is great reward to be had then there can still be forces who will rally to their cause. In this case with his nephews having so strong claim to the throne there would be even more people willing to risk the chance of placing one of his nephews on the throne for the reward and power they could receive for their loyalty if successful.
Except if you look at the timeline, there is a startling lack of uprisings in favor of the princes. There was, however, an uprising in favor of a man whose claim to the throne was through their sister, giving the princes a better claim.
The vegetable thing is pretty much what Henry vii did to Clarence's son Edward of Warwick!
@@redemptivepeteyes he did. Agreed and it worked
This has been a fascinating video and I love the recreations of Richard and the Prince's faces. I've always had an interest in the history of the Plantagenets and Tudors. Your depiction of Richard III makes me think he was probably an approachable man. By all accounts, in the time he was on the throne England was prosperous and a good place to live (shame it's not much like this now).
Wow! Your representation of what Richard III looked like is eerily close to the appearance of actor, Richard Armitage, who was named after the monarch and has said he's always wanted to play Richard III.
I've been waiting for this episode!! I visited the Tower of London in February and it was so eerie to walk through the area where the two boys were held. The scratches/writing on the wall is haunting.
I’ve been doing a fair amount of research on the graffiti on the walls of the Tower. Most of it seems to be in the Beauchamp tower, the earliest being made by Robert Dudley, later Earl of Leicester, friend of Elizabeth I. I could not find anything earlier than that.
Richard III looks fantastic! And thank you for giving the young princes their faces - extraordinary!
Assuming what has happened… is so risky cause no facts proves the truth, lack of evidences.
Amazing work , thank you 🐝
The new evidence is out there, this video is great but without the audio. It has to be updated
Thank you for this. I read somewhere after Richard III's remains were found in the car park that the actors Benedict Cumberbatch and Richard Armitage were distantly related to RIII through one of his sisters. Your recreation of Richard's face resembles Mr. Armitage.
The recreation of the Princes is beautiful. I hope they are at peace wherever they are today.
It Would Also Be Great To Have A Recreation Of King Richard 3rd's Wife Anne (Neville) - There's A Lovely Stained Glass Picture Of Her In Cardiff Castle 🏰
He only had one wife, Anne Neville. Not three wives.
@borleyboo5613 they meant Richard *the* third's wife when they said "Richard 3rd's wife"
Amazing video! Loved how eloquently it's been narrated and presented. Your recreations are truly mesmerising, history comes alive with your beautiful work. Thank you so much. Much love from the UK 🙏🏻🇬🇧
Thank you so much! ❤️
Under Richard III. it seems there was always war and rumors of war. Not a particularly good time to be alive in England.
💯❣
I love your videos and look forward to every one!
I love seeing historical figures brought to life. Thank you.
I love this channel. It's perfect to come home after a long day to listen to someone with absolutely calming and realxing voice educate you while also offering more information that isn't normally discussed and then we get a bonus of the facial reconstructions of these lost historically life changing people. Thank you for being one of my biggest stress relievers after dealing with complete chaos at work. ❤
Ah, this is so nice to hear. Thank you so sincerely. We are so glad you’re enjoying the videos ❤️
@RoyaltyNowStudios It's the truth. It relaxes me so much while also covering some of the more interesting people and parts of history that I'm obsessed with. Also, could you do a video on Jeanne-Antoinette Poisson or as she is more famously known as Madame de Pompadour and how she went from Mistress to advisor to the French King Louis XV.
Seeing these historical figures smile always brings a tear to my eye. In that moment they become flesh and blood human beings, not just descriptions in some dusty history book.
I’ll be teaching Richard the III in my 7th grade theatre class, and we’re talking about theatre as propaganda, using this is an example. I’ll be showing this in my class for sure!!
Just so you know, Phillipa Langley isn't the founder of the Richard III Society. It was founded in 1924 by a surgeon called Saxon Barton. She is a member though.
a 2 seconds google search would reveal that. Kind of puts into question the validity of the information that this channel puts forward.
Wonderful reconstruction!!! Honestly, when his face appeared I sort of gasped and geared up. He looked EXACTLY how I imagined! I don’t know enough of history to say yea or nay of him killing his nephews, but it seems a disadvantage to him if they were killed. Henry Tudor had the most to lose. Again, wonderful job. All your videos are amazing.
I believe that they were killed by Buckingham on the orders of Margaret Beaufort, Richard did say that buckingham betrayed him in the worst possible manner and after his execution, Maggy B comes out and says that Buckingham died bcs he supported her son, which was total BS bcs he had a much better direct claim to the throne and he was quite rich, so why would he support a nobody from a bastardized line? Maggy B. could have convinced Buckingham to seize power and that they would support him, so in one swift swoop she eliminates the princes, buckingham and Richard´s credibility. If true, this would be a truly machiavelian move and I believe 100% they were capable of that and more
I completely agree with you!!
Whenever people argue that Richard III did not have the boys in the Tower killed, I ask a simple question: what would Richard have to gain from leaving them alive? Not only would England be divided between York and Lancaster, but it would then be split between those who believe Edward V was the rightful king, and those who believed that he was too young and thus Richard was more suitable
What would he have to gain by first declaring them illegitimate and then killing them? As protector, he could have had each one killed over the course of months and then he's king. So why bother declaring them bastards? Richard had a long history of using the law to get what he wanted, and he was doing that in this case. Keeping them alive lent legitimacy to the claim that he was always the rightful king. And if he HAD killed them, why not produce bodies? Richard probably knew that his brother had had Henry VI unalived and called in a broken heart via a smashed skull. No bodies wouldn't have done him any good. It doesn't make sense that he would kill them without proof.
@sdl1ishappy if Richard had delivered their bodies and announced that he had killed them, then the exact same people who would have risen up against him in support of Edward V's reign would have risen up against him for murdering who they saw as the true king. "Why bother declaring them bastards" to make his overthrow of Edward V legitimate. There's no way the people wpuld have supported Richard overthrowing Edward V if Edward V was not declared illegitimate. I'm not claiming that Richard III was the devil like Shakespeare portrayed him to be. But there is no way he didn't order those boys' deaths
@@fabulouschild2005 Exactly ! He had them be deemed illegitimate to secure his claim and likely had them killed to keep it.
@@fabulouschild2005 That’s if they were even killed ? . Richards sister Margaret of Burgundy has expenses for the princes in 1484 on her rolls . Not saying they were not but Margaret did not have any other princes in her care . It’s at least worth considering .
she could have made the payment not knowing that they were dead. They were DEFINITELY killed. People of that status didn't just disappear back then
I've read one source which proposed that Richard was not responsible as he'd had them declared bastards, but that Henry Tudor needed them.legitimate but dead. There are lots of options.
'Declaring' the princes bastards was meaningless with the backing of canon and common law.
Wow. The facial reconstruction on Richard III, he looked so handsome and his nephews also looked amazing each taking after their parents.
The breakfast for the children was probably for Richard’s son, Edward of Middleham, and George’s son and daughter, Edward,of Warwick and his sister Margaret who later became Countess of Salisbury and was executed by HenryVIII at the age of 82.
The War of the Roses video was epic (sorry Andre who had to compile information and edit the video) and I’m happy to see the next part of the conflict.
Thank you!!
Just found this channel! OBSESSED❤
Thank you and welcome to the channel ❤️❤️
Richard had the most to gain by their deaths. Every step he took with respect to his nephews, after Edward IV's death would suggest a nefarious purpose. As always, your presentation was excellent and so are your facial re-creations. You have a wonderful talent of bringing historical characters to life through your work. Thank you so much for sharing them with us.
Richard had nothing to gain by their deaths, certainly not by the secrecy of whatever happened to them.
@@nbenefiel He had a throne to gain by their deaths.
@@RavensonngThe boys were alive after Richard’s coronation. He already had the throne although there is no evidence he wanted it. Richard strongly disliked London. He rarely went there. He was most comfortable in the North, which he ruled with responsibility and kindness. They loved him. I suggest you read what gather city of York released the day after Bosworth.
@@nbenefiel You may be correct. There is no proof that he killed the princes. However, throughout history the struggle for power has lead to the execution of many rulers. Why did Bolingbroke kill Richard II, he had the throne already. Why did the French revolutionaries kill Louis, Marie Antoinette and the little Dauphin? Why was the entire Romanov family killed after the Russian Revolution? England's Charles I for that matter? There are too many instances to name them all. The fact is that these deposed monarchs and heirs presented a threat to the "new" reign or order. They needed to be eliminated. In the case of Richard III, although he had the throne already, the princes still represented a threat. Armies could be raised on their behalf as long as they were alive so yes, Richard had a motive to kill his nephews. Why the delay in the coronation? Why declaring them illegitimate? Why the insistence in separating the younger heir from his mother and family. There are many smoking guns pointed to Richard. Of course none of this can be proven thus far. However, homicide investigators would classify Richard as a person of interest.
@@Ravensonng If they dead why did Henry 7 have Perkin buried in a cemetery reserved for royalty?
There's a bit of Rufus Sewell in the new depiction of Richard III and I'm not mad at it. Beautiful work as always.
What a wonderful episode! You give such dignity and thought to everyone you portray. I can't tell you how much I, and my young daughters, enjoy your work. We so look forward to everything you do. 😊
It breaks my heart when children get caught up in these horrible fights for power. How scary for them....and terrifying for their mother. 😢
I enjoy the history you bring to each of your subjects, I love the depiction of Richard lll but most of all your recreation of the boys with side by side creations of their parents. Your work is GENIUS 😎
Thank you!! I wasn’t sure how people would feel about a purely artistic version of the boys, but I really enjoyed giving them a face and smiles. It humanizes them!
@@RoyaltyNowStudios......
I think they are magnificent portrait recreations.
@@RoyaltyNowStudiosyou can really see both of the parents in the boys! Fantastically done, yet again
I always love when you upload!!!!❤
Thank you ❤️ hope you enjoyed this one!
Beautifully done, as always!
Love the work you do. I put your recreations of Edward 4, Richard 3, and the princes side by side, and, yeah, you can see the family resemblance. What happened to the princes in the tower is a great mystery, and I hope that Charles 3 will agree to forensic exams of those remains.
I doubt that KCIII can afford to do a DNA testing. As I recall, they had some trouble with one Royal's DNA test, because a later wife had a pregnancy with someone else.
What if the skeletons were found to be royal, but not related to present monarchy.
It would put the entire monarchy in jeopardy.
I don’t think royal permission would be needed to exhume and test Perkin Warbeck.
I love starting off my weekends with your videos!
Thank you Becca! This was wonderful! I tear up on every one of these!
Thank you for making these with so much love and care, as always
Outstanding Documentary, Thank You!✨
Good historical videos thank you for having these available for free
Beautiful work, as always.
Your rendition of these old paintings and stories are so incredible. I feel as if I can touch history, almost.
I literally cried when your recreation of the princes smiled. Their story is so heartbreaking.
The recreations of these famous figures always gives me the chills, I just love seeing history come to life before my very eyes, your details of the lives of these people down to the physical attributes of their faces and bodies is truly astounding, keep up the good work.
Brilliant video. thank you!
Wow! Excellent work, thank you.
i love how u tell the stories as it is said and how u give many different rummors even and then facts laid out for our own self to think which is true and how as a history buff as i am u give them justic in all ur videos and thats the way it should be and then u bring them to life giving a wow feeling and that they was in fact real people same as us and u didnt on this one but most u even say and here they are today time and bringing up to date its always gives me goosebumps and i think that if any of them seen what u do they would be in awe as well thank u for doing this its so great
The recreation of Richard 111 was amazing. Such a beautiful video.
They said that during the reconstruction, that the staircase the princes were found under was from older than the 1400s and so that the skeletons found were before the 15th century or more. I wander what would had happened if the Woodvilles had carried out the late king’s wishes and waited until the boy came of age instead of looking like a power grab and trying to leave out Richard. Elizabeth and her brother had already gone for the treasury upon Edward’s death ordering a ship to carry the money, then Elizabeth took out more money upon Elizabeth’s brother’s arrest. Buckingham was married to a Woodville sister to make it more confusing. Lord Stanley’s heir was married to the sister of Elizabeth Woodville and his stepson was Henry Tudor and more confusions. Phillipa Langley, who found Richard the III’s grave, has a book coming out this month or the next on what they found concerning the Princes in the Tower
It maybe wasn’t the fear of one so young ruling, but the elder Woodvilles ruling instead, in controlling the future boy king and ignoring the will of Edward the IV in rushing the coronation to next month instead of at least two years and attemptedly leaving the appointed protector out from the beginning and raiding the treasury before Richard met up with the prince’s party, having supposed to have met up with the prince.
He had multiple nephews and was raising the orphaned children of his late brother George and named one of his nephews his heir upon the passing of the son Edward. His history in court is of compassion for the common people and was often called a merciful lord that in a way that was used to take advantage of him and jump him
The skeletons were found in 1674 buried 10 feet deep under a massive ancient stone stairway built in 1097 which was being removed. The Tower site has been inhabited since well before the Romans. Many skeletons have been found there. It is extremely unlikely that the skeletons n Westminster belonged to the princes. I like your post. You’ve done your homework.
@@nbenefiel, you are right about the skeletons. Whatever really happened to the boys, they have not been buried under that staircase.
I don't know if Richard has given out the order to kill them or not. We will probably never know for sure. But while Shakespeare's play "Richard lll" is undeniably a great play, it's also a great example of political propaganda. We have to remember that the first Tudor king Henry Vll, who also had an excellent motive for making the princes disappear - if they were still alive - was Elisabeth's grandfather! These turbulent times were still fresh in everybody's mind, and Elisabeth wanted a nice piece of Tudor propaganda 😉
@@sabineb.5616 Many, many years ago, when I was working on my MPhil theses and my doctoral dissertation, I spent most summers in London. I always considered my interest in RichardIII as a hobby. I spent most of my days at the Public Records Office and the British Museum reading room. When I was tired of translating my early Irish annals, I looked up stuff on Richard. I was taught that account rolls were very reliable sources of information. I saw the entries in Richard’s accounts of purchases for “the Lord Bastard” and “the son of EdwardIV”. This was not a new discovery, but I wanted to see them for myself. They certainly indicated that the boys were alive. There is also an entry in the account rolls of Margaret of Burgundy of money allocated for “ the raising of Yorkist heirs”. We know what happened to all but two of the Yorkist heirs. I think young Edward eventually died from the jaw abscess Dr Argentine was treating him for and that young Richard was executed by Perkin Warbeck.
Really well done, thankyou!
your recreations are magnificent!
Thanks so much for another super amazing video! I hope this channel grows into the millions of subscribers.
Every time I watch one of your videos I get goosebumps. The history is amazing and the recreations are phenomenal. I always feel a connection with the person being recreated. I teared up a bit when I saw the boys. So sad and tragic. Always look forward to your videos.
Simply amazing recreations
When I saw your Richard’s reconstruction immediately I remember the White Queen serie, because Aneurin Barnard was a perfect Richard, very similar to real Richard 😊
You have the most soothing voice I’ve ever heard. Keep up the good work!
What a wonderful depiction of Richard III & Nephews.
Thank you. Well presented
Beautiful work in re-creation and informative story telling, as always.
Thank you ❤️
Loved it, thanks.☮️
Wow! That was so good!
LOVE your work! Thank you! ❤
I love your recreations. They are sooooooo realistic
Absolutely amazing ..
I adore your videos. The history, imagery and of course the recreations. I would love to know where you find the music that accompanies your fantastic storytelling.
Done so quickly after the War of the Roses video this was just as excellent and the physical depictions were exquisite. Lastly, your voice is perfect for narration.
Excellent video. Thanks
Amazing
Excellent! Thank you...❤
OMG! AMAZING!!
this was excellent, I really loved seeing your reconstruction, it seems very plausible that he looks like that. Those poor boys tho..the whole thing was a tragedy
Man, I bet you're such a great person to have long conversations with. I LOVE history and I'm the only one besides my Dad in my entire family and friends that does, so when I talk about anything history related, they look at me like I'm the most boring person, lol. I only have my dad but it would be nice to talk to someone else for a change, lol.
Amazing.
Love history great narration 👏🏻
I loved the artistic pictures...not to mention the information...I remember when King Richard III was discovered...it was very exciting! :)
Your work is fantastic, I really love your chanal ❤
One of my fave youtube channel ❤
Is it my imagination or does Edward V have a slight likeness to Prince William of today? I mean I can kind of see it? Great job! I absolutely love your videos and recreations. You make it simple and intriguing to understand such complex narratives and people! You’ve actually helped me understand the timeline better than ever before! Thank you!
Such an excellent video! This is indeed a magnificent part of history, one of the greatest true tales of good overcoming a child murdering greedy tyrant.
After watching a ton of your videos, I've finally subscribed! I'm commenting here, belatedly, because your recostruction of Richard III looks a lot like Aneurin Barnard, who portrayed Richard in the TV series "The White Queen". I'm a Ricardian, but I'm open to the idea that he may have done bad things to survive. Much love!
I like many who watched this shed tears when the reconstruction of the boys came on the screen ... Just heartbreaking what happened to them, you gave them beautiful, sweet faces... ❤
Very nice representation and recreation of the faces!
I am a Richardian, who believes that Richard lll was not like Shakespeare's famous villain: the real Richard did good and also a few bad things. He wasn't a psychopath who enjoyed to be a villain. But he was a man of his time, and he had indeed a good motive and also the opportunity to get rid of the princes. He might've convinced himself that it was a necessary evil because not everyone would accept the validity of his titulus regius, and the Woodvilles were a quarrelsome lot. Another bloody succession war would cost many more lives than just the lives of two kids. That sounds very callous, but it's probably true.
It's also true that after Richard's death Henry Tudor had an even stronger motive to get rid of the kids than Richard, because - unlike Richard who had declared that his nephews were illegitimate and therefore not in line for the throne - Henry accepted them and their sister, whom he would marry later, as legitimate children of King Edward IV and Elisabeth Woodville. But if Richard's titulus regius was invalid, the older boy Edward was the undisputed crown prince, and if he was dead, his younger brother would be the next in line for the throne. There would've been no room for an outsider like Henry Tudor! But at the time when the boys had started to disappear, Henry didn't have the opportunity to harm the princes. However, it's very sad to contemplate this, but the kids might've never had a great chance to survive these turbulent times. If the princes would've still been alive and well in the Tower after Richard had been killed on the battlefield, Henry Tudor wouldn't just have had a much stronger motive but also the opportunity to get rid of the boys. It's very interesting btw that for some reason Henry never accused Richard of having been responsible for the murder of his nephews, although Henry was very eager to destroy Richard's reputation completely. It’s also interesting that Henry seemed to consider some claimants, who came forward many years later, to be dangerous, even if he didn't openly admit it. He genuinely didn't seem to know what had become of the princes! Could this be a hint that Henry Tudor had nothing to do with the disappearance of the princes? Who knows...
I have never been aware of the discovery of Richard's note which said that children would be expected to arrive at a certain date. It's intriguing for sure - but it doesn't prove anything, and maybe Richard just wanted to get the boys killed outside of the Tower because that would facilitate the disposal of the bodies - but it's also possible that our assumption that these royal families were totally ruthless and wouldn't hesitate to destroy each other without second thoughts in order to gain or hang on to a position of power, isn't correct. Richard had been very close to his older brother, and his devotion seems to have been genuine. Isn't it possible that he knew that the boys could become a problem, and that it would be wise to get rid of them, but that Richard couldn't bring himself to go through with the plan of killing them. The last regent of the Tudor dynasty, Elisabeth l hesitated a long time before she finally ordered the execution of her imprisoned cousin Mary, Queen of Scotland. And Elisabeth felt very guilty for the rest of her life, although she never even knew Mary personally! Isn't it possible that Richard might've decided that there were other ways to deal with the problem than killing two innocent boys who were the children of his brother? Have the princes been quietly sent away in order to be raised anonymously somewhere abroad? Richard would've known full well that this could cause problems in the long run. But maybe, Richard believed that he just needed a few years of peace in order to stabilize his reign and win the full acceptance of his people. And if one of the boys should really decide to re-surface as an adult, the titulus regius would still be legit, and King Richard lll would've the right to crush him as a traitor. Richard wasn't known to be a coward, and he might have been willing to accept a certain amount of risk, if he didn't kill the boys. We simply don't know Richard well enough, and therefore we will probably never know for sure what really happened to the princes.
Love this. Richard was obviously very handsom. Nice smile. Boys very handsom. No surprises there with such beautiful parents.
Nice video!😲
Your recreation of Richard III is wonderful. It looks more realistic than the bust you based your recreation on.
Obsessed with this entire channel
Thank you ❤️❤️❤️
#Wow !!! Thank you for bringing history back to life .. Its easy to forget that the people in books ,we read were really real people not fiction.....You do such a beautiful job telling us their story and showing us the people they really were and giving them a voice and a face 😍.... #Thank you !!! ❤❤❤❤❤
Very interesting.
What a beautiful tribute to those boys and Princes. I truly love your videos!
I could watch your videos all day. I find them so fascinating and your story-telling eloquent and intriguing. Beautiful work as always. I'd like to think the princes were raised in secret and lived a happy life, but I believe their existence was too risky for Richard and sadly, he probably had them killed.
We know the boys outlived Richard’s coronation. He had no reason to kill his nephews. There is no evidence Richard conspired to take the throne. Before the announcement at the Privy Counsel, Richard was busy arranging young Edward’s coronation, mainly funding it out of his own pocket as the Woodville’s had stolen EdwardIV’s treasury.
It was practically part of the job description to get rid of claimants to the throne. Richards father tried unsuccessfully to remove Henry vi, his son Edward did usurp him successfully. Richard successfully usurped Edward v then Tudor successfully usurped Richard iii. I think they were ALL men of their time but soooo many ppl seem to think Richard was some exception. Highly unlikely
I would rather believe that the princes were spared and Richard III had them sent away and made sure they were well cared for throughout their lives. There have been a couple of speculative theories in regards to what happened to Edward V. One of them was in regard to a young 15 year boy named John Evens who shows up out of nowhere in a village called Coldridge and lived in a manor with a man named Thomas Grey who was the half brother King Edward IV. People speculated that it was indeed Edward V. He died in 1511 at the age of 41. Great Video as always.
Edward suffered from a serious abscess of the jaw. He was being treated by Dr.Argentine, it probably killed him.
The recreation of the boys. So adorable ❤
So glad to see the face behind the voice! You guys are the best. Thank you for showing historical art and telling artful history 🎉
Thank you!
OOHHHH the historical drama!