I can EXPLAIN Microsoft Fabric with ONE WORD

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ค. 2024
  • Join this channel membership to get access to all the recorded bites as they become available:
    / @curbalen
    I can explain MS Fabric with one word.
    Pricing viceo here:
    • Understanding Microsof...
    Here you can download all the pbix files: curbal.com/donwload-center
    SUBSCRIBE to learn more about Power and Excel BI!
    / @curbalen
    Our PLAYLISTS:
    - Join our DAX Fridays! Series: goo.gl/FtUWUX
    - Power BI dashboards for beginners: goo.gl/9YzyDP
    - Power BI Tips & Tricks: goo.gl/H6kUbP
    - Power Bi and Google Analytics: goo.gl/ZNsY8l
    ☼☼☼☼☼☼☼☼☼☼
    POWER BI COURSES:
    Want to learn Power BI? How about you take one of our courses? Here you can find the available courses:
    curbal.com/courses-overview
    ☼☼☼☼☼☼☼☼☼☼
    ABOUT CURBAL:
    Website: www.curbal.com
    Contact us: www.curbal.com/contact
    QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? SUGGESTIONS? You’ll find me here:
    Linkedin ► goo.gl/3VW6Ky
    Mastodon ► @ruthpozuelo@techhub.social
    Twitter ► @curbalen
    Facebook ► goo.gl/bME2sB
    #CURBAL #SUBSCRIBE

ความคิดเห็น • 115

  • @boyinlove2k
    @boyinlove2k ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I really do love your independence @Curbal. Even though you are an MVP, you voice your opinions freely, whether they be supportive, critical or cautious. Keep up the great work!

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks! ☺️

  • @dicky4780
    @dicky4780 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Best fabric video so far, it cuts through the MS marketing hype and clearly states some important risks. I work for a small charitable organisation with 150 power bi users. For the last few weeks it has felt as if we will have to move to fabric but your video puts my mind at rest . Just good old SQL and power bi for us 😅

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds just right. Glad the video helped!

  • @michaelwu1555
    @michaelwu1555 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Great video! Unlike others that are promoting Fabric, it's great to hear different opinions in terms of what fabric will do for Power BI Developers.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks :)

  • @Phoenixspin
    @Phoenixspin ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ruth is throwing cold water on my dreams. She raised my hopes with her one word, "Convenient", but then she added another word, "Danger". Let's just make a new word, "Convenient-danger". A word that strikes terror in the heart of my IT manager.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Covenient danger 😂😂 It applies to so many things!!

  • @vijayk416
    @vijayk416 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really appreciate the candid and transparent thinking you provide here. The So-What implications really jump out.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Vijay :)

  • @andreadelpilarhuertas2291
    @andreadelpilarhuertas2291 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for expressing an opinion about this product in an honest and unbiased way

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks Andrea, I always try to be fair in my reviews :)

  • @mcnater
    @mcnater ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for this overview. I l ove how you always keep it real and lay it out as it is.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Nate :)

  • @stephaniecoffey2945
    @stephaniecoffey2945 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the overview and insights! I was excited when fabric was announced, and started experimenting immediately. Within minutes, I realized how expensive it could be, having worked with the combined elements separately in the past. It does open up the potential role of data engineer to developers who haven't had the experience or exposure to these tools previously though. This may be part of the marketing plan ;)

  • @pedja2518
    @pedja2518 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative and honest video, which is rare these days.
    Thank you!

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks 2 u!

  • @tiagolopes977
    @tiagolopes977 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, this was the best Fabric video that answer all my questions.

  • @hahuyhung5248
    @hahuyhung5248 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The cost will be high with "pay as you go" pricing model, and it is the option for big company. But actually, I doubt that even big company will use Fabric when they already have their own data warehouse in some where else.
    As a BI person, I don't see the benefit that I will get from Fabric because I do not use notebook, do not take care warehouse, so why I have to pay for this, just integrate Power BI with Power Automate and Power App would be enough.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If your organisation sets up oneLake you probably will use that, for the rest, we are in agreement :)

  • @mnhworkdev1652
    @mnhworkdev1652 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can a on-prem SQL server be set up as a shortcut by using a remote gateway? This would ensure that our data at rest would still be on-prem.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question… my guess would be only cloud services, but I could be wrong. Ask in the community to be sure!

  • @benhalicki9749
    @benhalicki9749 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fabric sounds promising. While I do wish Microsoft would slow down with the rebranding, I find the current data toolset so difficult to configure and administer that id rather not use them. Hopefully with one unified platform, this becomes a lot easier. Thanks for this video Ruth, always appreciate the time and effort you put in to bringing us up to speed :)

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Fabric has definitely done a great job to make those data engineering products easier to use :)

  • @antonzhong9970
    @antonzhong9970 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video... but now I'm intrigued to find out how horrible the data lake setup is.. just for comparison. Mind to inform which video it is ? Thanks.

  • @elrevesyelderecho
    @elrevesyelderecho ปีที่แล้ว +3

    17:40 IF the company is NOT already paying for any Premium license/Capacity it won't do it for Fabric.

  • @ThomasPaulsen
    @ThomasPaulsen ปีที่แล้ว

    what enterprise databases are the target group? Are we talking about Oracle/SAP data warehouse reporting? Should this replace Oracle Analytics Cloud (OAC) for example? Currently we use OAC extracts, upload the files to SharePoint in order to report via PBI.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      At the moment they have integration with Amazon S3. I am sure they will
      Extend that to other clouds.

  • @jeroendekk1
    @jeroendekk1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am very confused what pay as you go means.
    If I use more compute then my F sku allows. What will happen. Will I pay more? Or will it become slow. The second is accetable, the first will mean a lot of management and control is necessary.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      I havent tested the paid features yet, so I am not sure. On Google pay as you go means the more you pay literally for usage. I would assume here is the same but cant tell for sure.

  • @SpeedyWinds
    @SpeedyWinds 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice!

  • @chaz2jerry
    @chaz2jerry ปีที่แล้ว

    My understanding is that “pay as you go” here means you have option to pause the capacity any time and save cost, and the max cost is when keep capacity running 24/7, similar cost to P capacity at reserved pricing. For SMB the lower F tiers will work better. The extra cost with OneLake storage can still be an issue but generally lake storage is cheap.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My understanding too. You have to pause it, which is not an easy thing to do when you spin off all those products. I have used Google pay as you go products and they can get really expensive if you are not careful.

  • @hamishmaxa6509
    @hamishmaxa6509 ปีที่แล้ว

    So different points that touch the data (e.g. onedrive). Does this add an issue around data governance?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      You will definitely need to think through and plan ahead how to use and deploy Fabric.

  • @tyberiksen
    @tyberiksen 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Longtime viewer, first time commenting.
    Your content is incredible, thank you.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks 😃

  • @mnhworkdev1652
    @mnhworkdev1652 ปีที่แล้ว

    Genuine question, not sarcasm but if you have your cloud infrastructure in multiple cloud platforms ar'nt you doubling your attack surface and adding complexity?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      It is harder to attack two cloud services that just one?
      If you use only one cloud service you are completely exposed to their conditions. Minimum do a cloud and onprem in case you get in trouble with the cloud ! And different suppliers if you can.

  • @uniQue_XL
    @uniQue_XL ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Ruth for the great video.
    Could you please put the link for the Microsoft video you reffering to, on your video?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I checked and it seems to be there:
      Pricing viceo here:
      th-cam.com/video/6AAeV3bSMso/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=GuyinaCube

    • @uniQue_XL
      @uniQue_XL ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CurbalEN
      Thanka a lot!
      But I meant the other one. The one that the lady from microsoft explein about the Fabric platform.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh, here it is:
      m.th-cam.com/video/oxMUJT3p9f4/w-d-xo.html&vl=en

  • @joaorataoo
    @joaorataoo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Ruth,
    My congratulations on your video and the simple and transparent way you put your opinion.
    I'm glad that being MVP didn't cloud your analysis and independence. 👏👏👏👏👏
    As you mention, the goal of facilitating all data integration, necessarily has other motivations, as a private company this motivations are necessarily economic and domain.
    The price is effectively a black box, for now, and the surprises can be very unpleasant.
    The adoption of Microsoft Fabric by large companies will certainly lead to a large reduction in IT in these companies, and on the other hand, provide to these giant companies an even greater competitive advantage over smaller ones.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Lets see how the adoption goes, too early to tell !

  • @83Danielps
    @83Danielps ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @ivanmezev
    @ivanmezev ปีที่แล้ว

    I like what you said in the end: "Do not put all your eggs in one basket"

  • @BrianHurn
    @BrianHurn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If Microsoft executes on their SaaS vision for Fabric, I think it is certainly a step forward from PaaS solutions. Platform services require a sgnificant level of admin overhead, planning, and tracking, and the interfaces are clunky and difficult to learn (as you mentioned). The question isn't what the absolute cost of Fabric is, but what the total cost of ownership is compared to other solutions that can deliver a simlar level of performance, scalability, and end-user efficiency. According to the OneLake videos that Microsoft has produced, my sense is that OneLake will address some of the metadata, discoverability, and lineage concerns that you have.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fingers crossed they will!!

  • @GetResponsive
    @GetResponsive ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Ruth. I thought the choice for a F SKU would mean some capping. But if not that would change it. I want to know beforehand what my cost will be. A Fabric PPU would be great :-)

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      I can tell you 100% but pay as you go usually is pay by usage. Happy to retract if that is not the case :)

    • @dodgysuspect7103
      @dodgysuspect7103 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CurbalEN the pay as you go is capped, as long as you turn off auto scaling. It allows you to reduce costs by turning it off and paying only for the time it is on. Also apparently you can use fabric with power bi premium capacity with no change in cost, it is the same as F64 SKU, except you can’t turn it off. This is likely what the reserved pricing will look like but with lower tier options that don’t get power bi premium features.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      @dodgysuspect7103 Thanks!!

  • @brianferris1
    @brianferris1 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a new Data Architect who was last a Power BI Developer, I wish Fabric came out 3 years ago. The future is focused on Power BI

    • @brianferris1
      @brianferris1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Provisioning and connecting takes hours and months waiting for other things to be provisioned

  • @AnilAnvesh
    @AnilAnvesh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For large companies adapting new tools take years time. So, no need to panic about Microsoft Fabric at the moment. But Data Analyst and Data Engineer roles may merge in couple of years I guess. Also AI becoming good at Data Analysis is a concern for core Data Analysts, becuase anyone can do Data Analysis with simple prompts. This landscape will shift by 2025 I guess.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The skills required for both roles are fundamentally different, so I dont see a merge any time soon, but AI will definitely disrupt both roles.

  • @Trabant_Vishnya
    @Trabant_Vishnya ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still have problems with new ribbon design in PBI Service. It looks a way more complicated even for non-rookies. And that was for Fabric unification purposes...

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is more complicated.
      Distribute your reports through apps only and keep your business users away from Power BI service. Best practice imo.

  • @olemew
    @olemew 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:30 what's the name/link to your other video?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Here:
      m.th-cam.com/video/g73TwnjjTZw/w-d-xo.html

    • @olemew
      @olemew 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CurbalEN Thank you so much. Btw, we appreciate a lot your informed and honest take on new releases!!

  • @visheshjjain
    @visheshjjain ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Ruth,
    In the video you said something about connecting PBI to AWS.
    Do you know a way to get/connect to data stored in AWS S3 to PBI?
    Thank you!
    P.S. - Thank you for cautioning on how someone can quickly ramp up the Fabric bill!!!

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      They have a REST API
      docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/Welcome.html
      And 😂😂

  • @thomasivarsson1291
    @thomasivarsson1291 ปีที่แล้ว

    Det var mer än ett ord men tack för en jättebra genomgång. Det är DWH som är dyr och den borde man kunna ändra till vanlig Azure SQL Server.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ordet är ett, men förklaring av varför just den kräver några till :)

    • @thomasivarsson1291
      @thomasivarsson1291 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CurbalEN 💛 Väl spenderade 18-19 minuter.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tack 💛

  • @mondoburger1621
    @mondoburger1621 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Will you be covering fabric in more detail with use cases in future ?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not likely, but if something really cool pops up I will :)

  • @richardcroft3676
    @richardcroft3676 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On onelake, well we don’t just want one. We want different lakes for sensitive data segregation, security and archiving. I haven’t seen how that gets accommodated in fabric, but if it means onelake for analytics plus various other external lakes, well what’s the point.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, it maybe is a onelake for data engineering projects. Not sure either…

    • @BrianHurn
      @BrianHurn ปีที่แล้ว

      The solution is what Microsoft are calling domains within OneLake. You can see them described in the Microsoft Developers video titled "Eliminate data silos with OneLake the OneDrive for Data."

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, will watch that :)

  • @Baldur1005
    @Baldur1005 ปีที่แล้ว

    I mean the biggest for me is pricing model, which allows self service use the tools like spark notebook, Data Lake Gen 2, Synapse and Data Factory which allows to solve scenarios where Dataflows wheren't enough.
    Edit: Haven't watched till end of video. I didn't know it was Pay as you Go, I swear was thinking it was like Premium Capacity in PBI

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the pricing model is terrible. Pay as you go is impossible to plan or budget for, specially when it comes to data. You never know what you will consume at any given point in time.

    • @Baldur1005
      @Baldur1005 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CurbalEN I not sure I follow Adam said in that moment that PBI Premium got you covered th-cam.com/video/6AAeV3bSMso/w-d-xo.html

  • @pabeader1941
    @pabeader1941 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hype. That's the word.

  • @Carmen-ol7qj
    @Carmen-ol7qj ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it like an ERP?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, more like data engineering tools brought together

  • @Toddb2368
    @Toddb2368 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One word... 'Expensive'

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      It could be if you are no careful ….

  • @richardcroft3676
    @richardcroft3676 ปีที่แล้ว

    The outcome of companies adopting fabric is that PBI dev roles will get swallowed up by the data engineers/scientists. Visualisation is by far the easiest part of the whole BI function

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Or power bi engineers will swallow data engineers? It is the power bi platform you guys are stepping in ;)

    • @tighturs
      @tighturs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both ways are good news :)@@CurbalEN

  • @oscar3114mike
    @oscar3114mike ปีที่แล้ว

    me and my data engineer pal will build our own lakehouse with blackjack and hookers (read: APIs, Talend & Pentaho) 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Phoenixspin
    @Phoenixspin ปีที่แล้ว

    Seriously, some whistleblower says the US Government is in possession of alien spacecraft. I would like to get my hands on whatever they use for data analysis. I hope all the technology is open source so we won't have to pay these Microsoft Fabric prices.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      The 80s all over again!! 😂

  • @ImAzraa
    @ImAzraa ปีที่แล้ว

    Very generous explanation, really.
    I expected to be surprised but not like this, this is really unmanaged, kinda scares me, after watching your entire summary.
    Tbh, this is no substitute for proper integrations, having a proper data lake, and then build data lakehouse implementation, with purpose built warehouses.
    I DO NOT want to intake excel sources from my boneheaded sales users, nor do I want deal with files being directly placed from the desktop to the lake (operated by the same boneheaded users) when there are perfectly functional MS solutions to build integrations such as SSIS or Azure Functions (or their counterparts in Google Functions or AWS Lambda) or external platforms such as Fivetran, Celigo or Boomi, with external, better, datalakes (Snowflake, BigQuery)
    This is just lazy. Convenience is how you end up with unscalable, ungoverned models which do NOT contribute to forming proper data models for.. anything, really.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      Good point, data environment must be carefully planned. Letting anyone do everything will lead to chaos!

  • @harrisonsoares5242
    @harrisonsoares5242 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The way I see, Microsoft just combined a bunch of services into one place. It's convenient not revolutionary like some people are trying to sell. And you still gonna have to pay by the hour if you wanna use it.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is a big step for them, but not for the data world imo.

    • @Real28
      @Real28 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's some rebranding and refreshing (updating). Having it all under 1 roof is a big deal. You could do a lot of this now without it but also you'd spend a lot more time to get all of it working as close to as smooth.

  • @rvian4
    @rvian4 ปีที่แล้ว

    theres a little error in the title "farbric"

    • @banihas22
      @banihas22 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or is it 🧐 lol

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I fixed it :)

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂😂

  • @ChrisvanHasselt
    @ChrisvanHasselt ปีที่แล้ว

    It seems like a money vacuum - that giant sucking sound is your dollars going to Redmond.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you are not careful 😂😂

  • @holmengraa
    @holmengraa ปีที่แล้ว

    Convenience? Is the word convenience?

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is :)

  • @elrevesyelderecho
    @elrevesyelderecho ปีที่แล้ว

    13:00 agree with you.

  • @dilatedconciousness
    @dilatedconciousness ปีที่แล้ว

    An 18 minute video to explain it in ONE WORD 😂

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      It is the opposite, I explained one word in an 18 min video. 😉

  • @elrevesyelderecho
    @elrevesyelderecho ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Before start. In one word? But it needs a 19 minutes video to explain it

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good point, should have said summarise in one word! 😂

    • @elrevesyelderecho
      @elrevesyelderecho ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CurbalEN ❤️ Good review. Thanks. Microsoft has put too many marketing lights, sounds and whistles that when you step back to watch what they are offering it makes me feel like always: this is a new toy that the company won't afford.

  • @jacky_23
    @jacky_23 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Microsoft fabric really bringing value to a single user.. or is this all just about making money with Enterprise subscription.. typical Microsoft behavior... they are just going too fast.. building fear about AI😢 what do you think Ruth..

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      They have simplified the way you do data engineering for enterprises and create a new licensing model for that.
      When it comes to AI, they are going too fast with it without properly assessing the consequences. :(

  • @Phoenixspin
    @Phoenixspin ปีที่แล้ว

    You need to be extremely careful before you like people like me play around with this.

    • @CurbalEN
      @CurbalEN  ปีที่แล้ว

      We are twin souls, i would be extremely dangerous too 😂

  • @Wzxxx
    @Wzxxx ปีที่แล้ว

    Easier?? Honestly I hate MS products. 100000000 products without any real explanation. Almost all are duplicated etc, A huge confusion. No real manuals. Absolutely every MS product is a horror experience for me. Don't even talk about DAX...nightmare without any real MS manual.