Citizens United v. F.E.C. AP Gov (OLD)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
  • Watch the new and improved Citizens United v. F.E.C. video here!
    • AP Gov | Citizens Unit...
    Check out the AP Gov Ultimate Review Packet: www.ultimatere...
    Tik Tok @ LaMoneyProductions

ความคิดเห็น • 53

  • @aaronkintzer3943
    @aaronkintzer3943 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    I feel like every supreme court ruling like these are just them saying "i mean yeah i guess technicallyyyyyyy" "yeah that sounds about right" "Well if we use the definition of ____ it technically means hes all good" "i mean fair enoughhhhhh"

  • @xThanya
    @xThanya 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Thank you for all these videos! I'm doing last-minute studying and binge-watching everything. My ap test is 4 days and I'm feeling a little better about the court cases so thank you so much!

    • @vecvecvec
      @vecvecvec 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      same lmao,, gl on the test!!

    • @xThanya
      @xThanya 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@vecvecvec Thanks, you too!

  • @isotaan
    @isotaan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    There's an important turning point that this video doesn't mention:
    At oral arguments, the government's attorney stepped in front of the Supreme Court and said that the government could ban the publication of political books. That was the turning point in this case. It caused a backlash among conservatives on the Court, which in turn led to the conservatives wanting to strike down BCRA. It caused the case to be re-argued the following year, and it concluded with big parts of BCRA struck down.

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That's true. He was responding directly to a question from a Justice, though. It was an tactical question and the attorney took the bait and walked right into the trap.

    • @isotaan
      @isotaan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@CareyLaManna There is a saying: You can't win a case at oral arguments, but you can always lose one. The Deputy Solicitor General certainly lost Citizens United that day.

  • @autumnpalmer8654
    @autumnpalmer8654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    i have an exam on this tmr so thank you!

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I got you, ms jackson, wooooo!

    • @autumnpalmer8654
      @autumnpalmer8654 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Saisidharth Seyyadri aw hey sai

    • @movalex9713
      @movalex9713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      did you pass?

  • @daniellalopez8528
    @daniellalopez8528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Learning more everyday!

  • @alexadeus9616
    @alexadeus9616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Never really knew fully about this case, but it’s really interesting! thank you !

  • @alexandracurtu1012
    @alexandracurtu1012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Got the AP exam tomorrow, I'm binging all your document/court case videos rn!!

    • @helenavila8656
      @helenavila8656 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what'd u get?

    • @alexandracurtu1012
      @alexandracurtu1012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@helenavila8656 a 5! These videos are extremely helpful definitely reccomend

  • @jonboxleitner7354
    @jonboxleitner7354 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Saying it's "not about free speech" doesn't make it "not about free speech."

  • @sifabutcher380
    @sifabutcher380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Look forward to these!

  • @Milan-ld7rs
    @Milan-ld7rs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2:20 damn thats some foreshadowing

  • @robhommy
    @robhommy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This was on my yt suggested page what’s up lamoney

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ayy what up kid. Load management forever

  • @sarahlerner276
    @sarahlerner276 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So helpful!!

  • @jennakleinman2988
    @jennakleinman2988 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Best form of review no doubt

  • @natebirdsong3134
    @natebirdsong3134 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Video Lamoney!

  • @condeandrew5745
    @condeandrew5745 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    liking your new beard!

  • @lashaundawatson6977
    @lashaundawatson6977 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    post notifications stay on 🙏

  • @ashleycorrea5585
    @ashleycorrea5585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    such a helpful video to review content quickly

  • @jacobhoang8754
    @jacobhoang8754 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another amazing video like usual

  • @carolinamartin98
    @carolinamartin98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    well explained

  • @zacharymarks1196
    @zacharymarks1196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quality Content!

  • @janinedowns391
    @janinedowns391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great video!

  • @nicolasgiovine6642
    @nicolasgiovine6642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ok now this is epic

  • @bryannaramirez1917
    @bryannaramirez1917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you!!

  • @jasmeenfajardo-lopez8382
    @jasmeenfajardo-lopez8382 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I peep the lost series in the bottom right :)

  • @aldovega8961
    @aldovega8961 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Free Yak

  • @clari13
    @clari13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice

  • @supersonic2778
    @supersonic2778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    BCRA time

  • @williamkern6842
    @williamkern6842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yo LaMonney would you say this applies or connects to any other cases??

    • @CareyLaManna
      @CareyLaManna  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can connect it to other speech or campaign finance cases. A few famous campaign finance cases: Buckley v Valeo, McCutheon v. FEC, McConnell v. FEC are just three that immediately come to mind

  • @diegoochoa6475
    @diegoochoa6475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    godly content

  • @juliashipman6533
    @juliashipman6533 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the review content

  • @zoeyvarela7127
    @zoeyvarela7127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍

  • @mayomonkey1639
    @mayomonkey1639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Movies condemning Republicans good. Movies condemning Democrats bad.

    • @MaddieMadness
      @MaddieMadness 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're actually simple enough to fall for the D v R trap. LMAO
      You probably support a party. hahahahahaha
      No such thing as a smart republican or a smart democrat supporter!

    • @angelaa7445
      @angelaa7445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Individual film maker vs corporation
      This isn’t about who is being criticized, it’s about who is doing the criticism

  • @jessicaha1100
    @jessicaha1100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    epic

  • @andresgaravito2444
    @andresgaravito2444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Citizens United 1 - 0 Hillary Clinton

  • @AdamSmith-gs2dv
    @AdamSmith-gs2dv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The court ruled right in this case. Come on guys if they ruled the other way the government could limit group political speech and do you really want that? Yes it has the negative side effect of corps being considered groups of people and thus they have free speech rights (ie the ability to spend money on ads) but is the other way any better? That the government can limit a groups right to free speech? That's sounds awful and something nations like China does. Remember this ruling doesn't just apply to corps it applies to ALL groups such as Labor Unions and Joe and Jane's campaign association. Sorry for the rant I just HATE how this ruling is viewed as "corps are people hurr durr" and people don't look at the broader question being asked

  • @miriamgoodwin7380
    @miriamgoodwin7380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome video !