@@d_00 It would be nice to get some credit, but don’t worry about needing to re upload the video. Pinning this comment and anding something in the description should be fine 👍 Edit: mattbatwings did also contribute, but it looks like the version of the circuit without his modifications.
@@ECanDo Ok, done it! I also credited Sloimay for the original comparator design, as I got the latter from a Matt video where he said it was from Sloimay. I can't find where I got that information though, so I can't be sure, sorry about that. Also, about the technical aspects of the comparator, I don't remember if I fixed it in the dikc-8 but it doesn't work for inputs 1 and 0, or 0 and 1, depending on how you build it, it says that 0 = 1 because the bottom XOR's redstone signal doesn't go up to the top. To fix this I separated the comparison for the top bit and the other bits, however I don't know if you knew about this issue, I don't remember Matt talking about it.
@@d_00 Awesome, thank you very much! In regards to the technical aspects, the original design was just meant to check for A > B, without any check for A == B. After approaching Matt with my design, for the video in question, he made the comment that it could also be used for the A == B, with a little bit of rewiring for the bottom bit. The version shown in the video is that version, with the extra wiring for that bottom bit. TLDR; Yes the signal strength was a known issue, and it was fixed. Thanks for bringing it up though! :)
@@creativecraft_mc I did use carpet mod but it's still slow on my potato lol About copper bulbs, I think using them will make the CPU slower: - 1.18+ is more laggy because of the increased world height - More complex behaviour, which surely means lag, and I don't really think I need a compact t-flip-flop when the computer is so big already - Not MCHPRS compatible (I know my CPU isn't but I'm working on it
This is amazing! However i think some improvements can be made, clock speed is pretty slow, and you would have to restructuralize the CPU to get it higher. You inspired me to make computational redstone again.
I'm glad I inspired you! As I said somewhere else in the comments, I am working on a much better version of this computer, upgrading pretty much everything. For example reading the registers is 6 times faster, and I added recursion...
Dude you are such a genius, it takes so much effort to build something like this, I've been trying to build a computer too but it takes a lot of work and I only have ROM and RAM. I liked and subbed. You are underrated. 😊
You deserve my sub. It very epic. 2 years ago i was a minecraft youtuber i making working gian flying machine. Today i make more awesome build in my channel if you want to see. GG for your computer ! You have my respect bro
You're doing a great job, and you have undeservedly few subscribers. Honestly, I couldn't do that. At the moment I am making a calculator in Minecraft (not an adder). So it's very interesting to me
Super cool pc, but I suggest that since your footage lags quite a bit, for you to slow down the camera speed to half, and then speed the footage 2x for twice the frames, if it works that way
Thanks! It does work this way, and I think that for the cinematic views I will use replay mod. However for the second part of the video it's gonna get really annoying to record at half the speed...
Man, How do people make computers in minecraft? I can kinda understand how some of the components work separately, like each part of ALU, but it still baffles me how people can put it all together into one coherent computer, especially not without making it massive and wasting a ton of space. The most advanced thing I've built using vanilla redstone is a moon phase calculator, which is basically just taking any decimal number then modulating it by 8. The input is done via 3 books on a pedestal, numbers repeat at 200 so a 4th pedestal is not needed. It doesn't need any ram, the only rom needed is the graphical rom for the display, and it just needs a couple of full adders for the calculation, nothing fancy. Input -> adders -> 3 to 8 decoder -> graphics rom -> screen, it's all linear, nothing going back into itself or any earlier components, that's the one thing that I just can't wrap my head around yet
The part where you link everything indeed is the most challenging one for me, because even if everything works separately you will have a LOT of issues with timings and stuff. I just gave up on speed at some point for this CPU, because I didn't plan ahead enough and it became a huge mess. For other CPUs I'm trying to plan ahead much more, but also focus more on speed, which is almost like a new challenge because the timings are even tighter and there's no room for anything, especially once you try to pipeline stuff. If you're trying to make a big fat cpu or something like that, I think your moon phase calculator is a good first step, helping you understand the fundamentals of computational redstone. But when you're ready, dive deep into making a complex and intelligent machine, which is something even Mattbatwings couldn't really explain in my opinion, since you have to practice this skill that depends highly on the context you're in. Good luck!
can you build a giant pc with 128-8 bit integer registers and 32 boolean registers and using as little repeaters, comparators, torches and pistons as possible so it can run anything?
fun fact, if you don't use repeaters, you have to use torches, or comparators, plus you need to have torches to make logic gates, and if you don't use any of those then you have to deal with the fact that redstone dust is very laggy... I don't think increasing the number of registers helps with improving the computer, you would have to add ram. If you take other cpus for example, like ones created by sammyuri or mod punchtree, among others, they can run a lot of things, but certainly not anything: minecraft cpus are limited by their size and speed.
@@d_00 you can make most things using pistons: since pistons instantly extend you can use it as a replacement for repeaters, they don't retract instantly though. for comparators, I get it. There is no faster way, as a hopper clock to count a containers content is far slower than just a comparator. It is also harder to do subtraction and a > b without comparators, for obvious reasons. You don't want to have to create 30 adders (yes, you need that many) for a simple xor gate. You can create most logic gates using pistons to replace repeaters: In AND you can make the pistons block a redstone line when extended, and then inverting the output using a piston that pushes the restone block away from the circuit when powered (otherwise NAND gate) In OR you don't need any components, except for if you want a NOR gate, then you can invert it using pistons In XOR there is pretty much no better solution than the 2-comparator design you use So the logic gates problem is "debunked" Onto the next one: You mention the redstone dust is pretty laggy, but that's really only your pc/laptop. I recommend going to any company close to where you live, like tech companies, school, enz. and ask if they have any leftover pcs; It got me out of the same struggle You said that it wouldn't help a lot to add more registers, but It really does, since you mention you need more memory to run heavy programs, but you don't need more memory, you need more registers. As a programming hobbyist (I think you are too looking at the compiler, nice job) I know that 16 variables are certainly not enough. I challenge you.
@@danielgeerds6382 Addressing the different points you mentioned: - I thought you wanted me to use as few pistons as possible? To me it seems like you want me to use them as replacement for other components, even though they are bigger, slower, laggier, less convenient to use in circuits - actually, it's the opposite: pistons retract instantly (in terms of cutting or linking power sources to other elements) but have a delay in the extension. plus, this is an odd game tick delay, which makes it harder to use in computational redstone - pistons are not MCHPR-compatible, meaning you can't accelerate the game that efficiently - redstone dust is notoriously laggy, not just on my computer. this has been a problem for many years, you should check out various tests people have made. you can litterally crash servers with some redstone dust.
@@d_00 You're right about the pistons, I thought it was the opposide :) For the redstone, well my redstone pc doesn't lag at tick speed 80, and looking at the recording, it seems like it is your pc, but still, try to make a very good pc that is still very fast, i'm curious to what the limit is
@@danielgeerds6382 I know my recording setup is trash, but redstone dust is laggier than other components on every setup (except for maybe non-vanilla servers like mchpr), it's just about relative performance, not absolute. For the actual limit, you can go up to 5Hz ""easily"", although with very niche things you could go up to 10Hz. Interesting question though...
um I don't think it would be feasible, since we often use redstone-only mechanics and not only logic gates. I think with an algorithm like backtracking to brute force placing the logic gates you would be able to create a schematic, but it would be very slow and inefficient.
pro tip: slow down the game while showing how it works and then just speed it up in the video editor. iused this trick when my game runned at 10 fps in some of my own showcases
Yeah, I figured it could be done but I didn't go for it... playing on a server should increase the recording performances for later, but thanks for the idea!
I use it to redirect redstone dust. For example, if you have a line of redstone dusts with a block+torch at the end, but to the side, you can change the block supporting the torch to a target block to maybe invert the signal when the line is powered. This dust-redirecting behavior can also be exploited to create 0-tick mechanisms, and for that I recommend watching Squibble's landmines videos.
it's a solid block which means if a redstone torch is on it and redstone powers the block, it will invert the torch. target blocks have the added function of redstone always pointing towards them, so it helps compact the circuit.
@@nikstere4871 hmm just click on the .zip file, it's named "DIKC-8 (by yt.com-@D_00).zip" and not "world download" so maybe that's why you didn't find it, but you just have to unzip it.
Cool! I recently made a cpu too, mine is also 8 bit. And is pipelined, and is 0.75hz. I only spent an hour or so on it, so could improve it. But good build. Sadly my cpu is a bit too fast, that i cant use it (im on mobile) so yeeeeee. Its like 7 ticks so pretty fast.
how did you do it only working on it for 1 hour? Seems you just copy-pasted other ppl's work, maybe you have a lot of experience on this subject, or the whole thing is only like a repeater clock lol. But if what you're saying is true, great job! But what do you mean when you're saying it's too fast for mobile? But again, the DIKC-8 is only a prototype, much better computer coming soon!
@@d_00 um I didn't copy paste anything, I just have alot of knowledge on this subject cause I learn it in my free time. And ye, it basically lags my phone (I play on phone) so I can't really use it. Theoretically I could use it to run simple games like snake, battleship, and 4 dot at a reasonable pace. But um I really just meant to say at the start is if U need any help I could help you. I'm currently working on a QR code generator, but I still need to understand error correction and reed Solomons equations to finish it. But im not even in high school so I don't understand anything.
@@barberdrake Ok, nice then! Sorry for suggesting random things about your knowledge. It just seemed to me that it was impossible to create such a computer (are you talking about the BDC1?) in such a small period of time. I assume that you meant that putting different parts together took 1 hour? I believe you also spent time designing and thinking about the different parts too, right? Anyway if I need help I sure will ask you. However, java and bedrock redstone are different, even in computational redstone...
@@d_00 yes I was talking about the BDC1, it took about an 1hour to build and design. But I'm a fast REDSTONE apparently. Plus I used world edit and structure blocks to speed stuff up.
@@d_00 what does 2048 bits or 256 bytes (I prefer 256 bytes but tbh doesn’t matter cuz means same thing) I feel like 2048 bits is like saying your 72 inches when your 6 foot same thing but i don’t know
@@zealotoffire3833 it is the same thing, but bigger numbers are more impressive lol and also even though instructions are exactly 2 bytes long, in practice they are cut in weird ways which make them more 16 bits than 2 bytes if you get what I mean
What do you mean by "very slow but compatible"? From what I understand about MCHPRS it doesn't matter, only your computer needs to fit in a 256x256 space? P.S.: Saturn v2.0 is cooool I'm trying to make the DIKC-8 II cleaner
@@steviousmusic that's one issue I need to fix, I'm using the same design for the dikc-8 II. Do you know of a rom design that could be used instead? I can't find anything online, however I should try asking the ORE server
@@d_00 yes, there are 2 2block/bit designs that are currently very popular. Also please focus on clock speed for dikc-8 II, 91t is very slow for a minecraft cpu :)
Didn't have a proper mic back there (I still don't) Google translation, I hope it makes sense: У меня там не было подходящего микрофона (до сих пор нет)
That is a really nice compare circuit!
I should know, I helped make it
Oh wow, thanks man! I don't think I credited you, I think you would want that changed?
@@d_00 It would be nice to get some credit, but don’t worry about needing to re upload the video. Pinning this comment and anding something in the description should be fine 👍
Edit: mattbatwings did also contribute, but it looks like the version of the circuit without his modifications.
@@ECanDo Ok, done it!
I also credited Sloimay for the original comparator design, as I got the latter from a Matt video where he said it was from Sloimay. I can't find where I got that information though, so I can't be sure, sorry about that.
Also, about the technical aspects of the comparator, I don't remember if I fixed it in the dikc-8 but it doesn't work for inputs 1 and 0, or 0 and 1, depending on how you build it, it says that 0 = 1 because the bottom XOR's redstone signal doesn't go up to the top. To fix this I separated the comparison for the top bit and the other bits, however I don't know if you knew about this issue, I don't remember Matt talking about it.
@@d_00 Awesome, thank you very much!
In regards to the technical aspects, the original design was just meant to check for A > B, without any check for A == B. After approaching Matt with my design, for the video in question, he made the comment that it could also be used for the A == B, with a little bit of rewiring for the bottom bit. The version shown in the video is that version, with the extra wiring for that bottom bit.
TLDR; Yes the signal strength was a known issue, and it was fixed. Thanks for bringing it up though! :)
god bless your work man. when you said "random mess that hopefully works" i felt that
lol looking back what a mess
Pretty big mistake that I only just noticed: 91-tick is 0.11Hz, and not 0.011Hz...
try use carpet mod and copper bulbs in your next cpu
also if its less laggy you can accelarate /tick more
@@creativecraft_mc I did use carpet mod but it's still slow on my potato lol
About copper bulbs, I think using them will make the CPU slower:
- 1.18+ is more laggy because of the increased world height
- More complex behaviour, which surely means lag, and I don't really think I need a compact t-flip-flop when the computer is so big already
- Not MCHPRS compatible (I know my CPU isn't but I'm working on it
What song is this i forgot
@@mcpenng I think I put them in the video, at the start
This is amazing! However i think some improvements can be made, clock speed is pretty slow, and you would have to restructuralize the CPU to get it higher. You inspired me to make computational redstone again.
I'm glad I inspired you! As I said somewhere else in the comments, I am working on a much better version of this computer, upgrading pretty much everything. For example reading the registers is 6 times faster, and I added recursion...
Dude you are such a genius, it takes so much effort to build something like this, I've been trying to build a computer too but it takes a lot of work and I only have ROM and RAM. I liked and subbed. You are underrated. 😊
If you managed to even start building one, surely you will succeed. You are underrated too.
@@d_00 🙂 thank you
You're a big inspiration for me!
Great work! You've got lots of potential in computational redstone. Excited to see what you make next!
You deserve my sub. It very epic. 2 years ago i was a minecraft youtuber i making working gian flying machine. Today i make more awesome build in my channel if you want to see. GG for your computer ! You have my respect bro
Thanks! I'll definitely check out your channel, looks interesting!
You're doing a great job, and you have undeservedly few subscribers. Honestly, I couldn't do that. At the moment I am making a calculator in Minecraft (not an adder). So it's very interesting to me
I'm glad it's useful to you! I hope this CPU (and the upcoming one) will be as inspiring for other people, this is my goal!
@@d_00 hm... where I can found your discord account? Or... Are there any other ways to contact you? I would like to talk)
@@RimYTT Sure! My discord is also d_00
@@d_00 ok)
@@d_00 I've send
random mess that hopefully work is mandatory
Super cool pc, but I suggest that since your footage lags quite a bit, for you to slow down the camera speed to half, and then speed the footage 2x for twice the frames, if it works that way
Thanks!
It does work this way, and I think that for the cinematic views I will use replay mod. However for the second part of the video it's gonna get really annoying to record at half the speed...
@@d_00 yeah, I meant for the cinematics, as those can easily be made 2x and double your frames
@@giovannicesaramorim9adigan961 ok. and with replay mod you can "record" at a fixed X fps, so that will make it even better
I'm the 100th subscriber and I'm happy about it
I'm happy too!
I’m so important that I got my own special mention lol
Also thanks for the awesome vid I’m building a computer myself ;)
@@user-zl2ju1ck7m Nice! I'm also building another computer myself ;)
Man, How do people make computers in minecraft?
I can kinda understand how some of the components work separately, like each part of ALU, but it still baffles me how people can put it all together into one coherent computer, especially not without making it massive and wasting a ton of space.
The most advanced thing I've built using vanilla redstone is a moon phase calculator, which is basically just taking any decimal number then modulating it by 8. The input is done via 3 books on a pedestal, numbers repeat at 200 so a 4th pedestal is not needed.
It doesn't need any ram, the only rom needed is the graphical rom for the display, and it just needs a couple of full adders for the calculation, nothing fancy.
Input -> adders -> 3 to 8 decoder -> graphics rom -> screen, it's all linear, nothing going back into itself or any earlier components, that's the one thing that I just can't wrap my head around yet
The part where you link everything indeed is the most challenging one for me, because even if everything works separately you will have a LOT of issues with timings and stuff. I just gave up on speed at some point for this CPU, because I didn't plan ahead enough and it became a huge mess. For other CPUs I'm trying to plan ahead much more, but also focus more on speed, which is almost like a new challenge because the timings are even tighter and there's no room for anything, especially once you try to pipeline stuff. If you're trying to make a big fat cpu or something like that, I think your moon phase calculator is a good first step, helping you understand the fundamentals of computational redstone. But when you're ready, dive deep into making a complex and intelligent machine, which is something even Mattbatwings couldn't really explain in my opinion, since you have to practice this skill that depends highly on the context you're in. Good luck!
"1 letter from ban" ahh name
Now, how's the project DIKC-8 II with the prospect of the cop-flop in mind?
hmm I'm still in 1.17 cuz potato + don't really need more than 1.7 redstone
and it's called a Crafty Copper Counter
No is the copper flopper, a one block t-flip flop
@@Moai_rocc hmmmm I guess so but what's the point of compacting a t-flip-flop when you don't really use it + look at the size of the CPU
Wow this computer is awensome🎉❤
Thanks, but it's a mere prototype compared to the computer that I'm working on...
The most amazing thing that I have ever seen In my life!
T'es vraiment un crack
I SUBBED AND LIKED
hope you also like tetris
I do
@@d_00 That's impossible to build.
@@mrkun5905 survival when
can you build a giant pc with 128-8 bit integer registers and 32 boolean registers and using as little repeaters, comparators, torches and pistons as possible so it can run anything?
fun fact, if you don't use repeaters, you have to use torches, or comparators, plus you need to have torches to make logic gates, and if you don't use any of those then you have to deal with the fact that redstone dust is very laggy...
I don't think increasing the number of registers helps with improving the computer, you would have to add ram. If you take other cpus for example, like ones created by sammyuri or mod punchtree, among others, they can run a lot of things, but certainly not anything: minecraft cpus are limited by their size and speed.
@@d_00 you can make most things using pistons:
since pistons instantly extend you can use it as a replacement for repeaters, they don't retract instantly though.
for comparators, I get it. There is no faster way, as a hopper clock to count a containers content is far slower than just a comparator.
It is also harder to do subtraction and a > b without comparators, for obvious reasons. You don't want to have to create 30 adders (yes, you need that many) for a simple xor gate.
You can create most logic gates using pistons to replace repeaters:
In AND you can make the pistons block a redstone line when extended, and then inverting the output using a piston that pushes the restone block away from the circuit when powered (otherwise NAND gate)
In OR you don't need any components, except for if you want a NOR gate, then you can invert it using pistons
In XOR there is pretty much no better solution than the 2-comparator design you use
So the logic gates problem is "debunked"
Onto the next one: You mention the redstone dust is pretty laggy, but that's really only your pc/laptop. I recommend going to any company close to where you live, like tech companies, school, enz. and ask if they have any leftover pcs; It got me out of the same struggle
You said that it wouldn't help a lot to add more registers, but It really does, since you mention you need more memory to run heavy programs, but you don't need more memory, you need more registers.
As a programming hobbyist (I think you are too looking at the compiler, nice job) I know that 16 variables are certainly not enough.
I challenge you.
@@danielgeerds6382 Addressing the different points you mentioned:
- I thought you wanted me to use as few pistons as possible? To me it seems like you want me to use them as replacement for other components, even though they are bigger, slower, laggier, less convenient to use in circuits
- actually, it's the opposite: pistons retract instantly (in terms of cutting or linking power sources to other elements) but have a delay in the extension. plus, this is an odd game tick delay, which makes it harder to use in computational redstone
- pistons are not MCHPR-compatible, meaning you can't accelerate the game that efficiently
- redstone dust is notoriously laggy, not just on my computer. this has been a problem for many years, you should check out various tests people have made. you can litterally crash servers with some redstone dust.
@@d_00 You're right about the pistons, I thought it was the opposide :) For the redstone, well my redstone pc doesn't lag at tick speed 80, and looking at the recording, it seems like it is your pc, but still, try to make a very good pc that is still very fast, i'm curious to what the limit is
@@danielgeerds6382 I know my recording setup is trash, but redstone dust is laggier than other components on every setup (except for maybe non-vanilla servers like mchpr), it's just about relative performance, not absolute.
For the actual limit, you can go up to 5Hz ""easily"", although with very niche things you could go up to 10Hz. Interesting question though...
incredible
Cool cpu :)
Thanks!
there must be someway to use something like circuit verse and then convert the file you designed to minecraft
um I don't think it would be feasible, since we often use redstone-only mechanics and not only logic gates. I think with an algorithm like backtracking to brute force placing the logic gates you would be able to create a schematic, but it would be very slow and inefficient.
also having trouble with making the assembler and compiler work
@@Player56TF2 Sorry about that, can you explain in more detail here? github.com/d-002/dikc-8/issues
pro tip: slow down the game while showing how it works and then just speed it up in the video editor. iused this trick when my game runned at 10 fps in some of my own showcases
Yeah, I figured it could be done but I didn't go for it... playing on a server should increase the recording performances for later, but thanks for the idea!
@@d_00 :D
OMG YOUR AMAZING
are there world files anywhere?
There's a litematic in the GitHub page, and I recently added a world download there too.
what is the song
I think they are displayed in the intro.
thanks@@d_00
Why do you put a target block in redstone mechanisms?
I use it to redirect redstone dust. For example, if you have a line of redstone dusts with a block+torch at the end, but to the side, you can change the block supporting the torch to a target block to maybe invert the signal when the line is powered.
This dust-redirecting behavior can also be exploited to create 0-tick mechanisms, and for that I recommend watching Squibble's landmines videos.
it's a solid block which means if a redstone torch is on it and redstone powers the block, it will invert the torch. target blocks have the added function of redstone always pointing towards them, so it helps compact the circuit.
When comes the World-Download??
It's already in the GitHub: github.com/d-002/dikc-8
@@d_00 I dont find it there!
@@nikstere4871 hmm just click on the .zip file, it's named "DIKC-8 (by yt.com-@D_00).zip" and not "world download" so maybe that's why you didn't find it, but you just have to unzip it.
@@d_00 Oh yeah, thank you!
@@nikstere4871 glad you found it
Nice, Tha compactness is very sexy, although that is a pretty slow clock speed. haw many ticks are each instruction (ideally, without the clock)
Ummm I didn't really know how to use pipelining when I made this computer, so an instruction is like 50 ticks
Cool! I recently made a cpu too, mine is also 8 bit. And is pipelined, and is 0.75hz. I only spent an hour or so on it, so could improve it. But good build. Sadly my cpu is a bit too fast, that i cant use it (im on mobile) so yeeeeee. Its like 7 ticks so pretty fast.
how did you do it only working on it for 1 hour? Seems you just copy-pasted other ppl's work, maybe you have a lot of experience on this subject, or the whole thing is only like a repeater clock lol. But if what you're saying is true, great job! But what do you mean when you're saying it's too fast for mobile?
But again, the DIKC-8 is only a prototype, much better computer coming soon!
@@d_00 um I didn't copy paste anything, I just have alot of knowledge on this subject cause I learn it in my free time. And ye, it basically lags my phone (I play on phone) so I can't really use it. Theoretically I could use it to run simple games like snake, battleship, and 4 dot at a reasonable pace. But um I really just meant to say at the start is if U need any help I could help you. I'm currently working on a QR code generator, but I still need to understand error correction and reed Solomons equations to finish it. But im not even in high school so I don't understand anything.
@@barberdrake Ok, nice then! Sorry for suggesting random things about your knowledge. It just seemed to me that it was impossible to create such a computer (are you talking about the BDC1?) in such a small period of time. I assume that you meant that putting different parts together took 1 hour? I believe you also spent time designing and thinking about the different parts too, right?
Anyway if I need help I sure will ask you. However, java and bedrock redstone are different, even in computational redstone...
@@d_00 yes I was talking about the BDC1, it took about an 1hour to build and design. But I'm a fast REDSTONE apparently. Plus I used world edit and structure blocks to speed stuff up.
@@d_00oh and do U have a discord?
Can it run doom?
I don't think so lol
it doesn't have enough memory, but I think the DIKC-8 2 theoretically can (transfer data+program through I/O ports)
@@d_00i mean it could be possible but at very low fps. Very cool pc setup btw
Why is it called dikc
It's said in the video: D_00's Incredible Keyboardless CPU
you could have said 256 bytes instead of 2048 bits but u do you
it sounds better
@@d_00 what does 2048 bits or 256 bytes (I prefer 256 bytes but tbh doesn’t matter cuz means same thing) I feel like 2048 bits is like saying your 72 inches when your 6 foot same thing but i don’t know
@@zealotoffire3833 it is the same thing, but bigger numbers are more impressive lol
and also even though instructions are exactly 2 bytes long, in practice they are cut in weird ways which make them more 16 bits than 2 bytes if you get what I mean
Replace K with C and C with K in the name and see what you get
wiat
i ddint notiec
this is crazy impressive
nice but too slow, you can make the clock very slow BUT MCHPRS compatible
What do you mean by "very slow but compatible"? From what I understand about MCHPRS it doesn't matter, only your computer needs to fit in a 256x256 space?
P.S.: Saturn v2.0 is cooool I'm trying to make the DIKC-8 II cleaner
its not it got loads of observers
@@steviousmusic that's one issue I need to fix, I'm using the same design for the dikc-8 II. Do you know of a rom design that could be used instead? I can't find anything online, however I should try asking the ORE server
@@d_00 yes, there are 2 2block/bit designs that are currently very popular. Also please focus on clock speed for dikc-8 II, 91t is very slow for a minecraft cpu :)
@@d_00 also if you wanna see my cpu, you can head on ore, join build server (/build) and then warp using /warp miniCAPPUS_v1
FLASH WARNING edit: pin me
oh sorry, when exactly in the video?
Стоит тебе побольше говорить.
Didn't have a proper mic back there (I still don't)
Google translation, I hope it makes sense: У меня там не было подходящего микрофона (до сих пор нет)
e
rush
I love the DIKC (It's not what you think)
what do you think I'm thinking?
@@d_00 Ehmm forget
Can we appreciate how much effort he puts in his videos? ❤