Wasn't being weak with his teammates lol fair play ball was done not anyone's fault but that keeper that it went in. That bounce was nutty but still not their problem
@Alek Wolf the ball had gone out of play for an injury, normally a team will play the ball to the opponents. Which this guy tried and the ball bounced over the opposition keeper
@Alek Wolf If I remember correctly there was some kind of injury. Lillestrøm stopped playing. That resulted in a drop. Mjelde was supposed to play it to the opponent keeper. The wind took the ball and Brann scored.
Now imagine this happened in the knockout stages of the Champions League, where one of the goals gets an away goal. That would really mess things up :O
No, he played a difficult high ball back. If his intention was to give the ball back for fair play, he failed miserably. His own team was pissed at him if you actually watch the video. None of this is FIFA-enforced, it was all legal play, and just the players deciding what they should do.
@@banger2998 sorry not sorry, the player who kicked it back got his whole team mad at him. It was careless, if not malicious. But so what, it's all legal, and his team decided to give a goal back. If it was obviously the GK's fault they wouldn't have done that, Period.
+Jake Muller i imagine he get's a clean sheet bonus. I can imagine he'd be a bit pissed off about being forced to lose out on that. I hope the player who scored covered his loss if no more goals were conceded.
+Ken Loves Brissy it's not that the opponents were angry. They had to play it after injury and possession's supposed to go back to the other side. The kick is just a form of courtesy and scoring from that point goes against the point of the ball kick.
He clearly wasn't trying to score when he kicked the ball to the goalie. Nobody bounces a ball that far out and thinks they'll be scoring with a shot from that far out. Just a shit goalie that let in a bad goal trying to save face.
I think the object of the "fair goal" was to allow the other team to try to score with only the goalie trying to stop it, not the whole team. Still I don't agree with them doing that though.
Ffollies The goalie(Piotr Lechiewski) didn't agree with the whole fair-play idea, so he actually tried to prevent it from being a goal(which he said in a interview after the game).
first goal is from a fair play kick for yellow team but accidentally the goal keeper miss the catch. It's a legal goal, yes. But the captain of red team cannot accept it as a goal (maybe because it's from a fairplay kick) but the ref still announced it as a goal. That's why the red team let the yellow team score a free goal to equalized with them. (sorry for my bad english)
"fair play" happens after a player is injured. The 1st goal was meant to be a sportsmanlike kick to hand the ball over, and accidentally scored. So they let them get even.
John Walsh-Wadlegger I know what fair play is, but in the video the keeper tries to save the ball. Clearly it was in play and it should count as a goal and the other team should not be given the free goal.
BforBewbies Of course it was in-play. But they just gave back the ball to the other team, it wasn't the intention to score a goal. The goalkeeper was trying to catch the ball, in order to continue play.
MSGhazarian It was in play and did count. No one said they HAD to let the yellow team score, the team in red chose to let their opponents score as they had accidentally beaten a goalkeeper who wasn't expecting a shot.
im glad they chose fair play, i dislike the anger to the unfortunate scorer also, he didnt mean for it, you could see that on his face, he was embarrsed
For example, a player is down with a injury and the player that has the ball, plays it out of bounds to stop the match, and let the injured player get help. When the game starts again, it’s the other teams ball. But it would be considered fair play to give the ball back to the team that had possesion. Usually with a long pass to the keeper, so the play «resets».
What would happen if the away goal rules were in play? For example, if these two teams have already played a scoreless draw at the home stadium of the yellow team and this was the 2nd leg... the "fair play goal" could mean the red team is out of the competition.
If it was a cup competition, and away goal rules were in play, this would probably not have happened. Perhaps the home team (LSK) would get 2 goals and the away team (Brann) would get 1
First of all everyone understood it was a kick back, meaning the ball real wasn't in play according to the players and its meant to sportsmanship at work. I don't think the goalie was expecting such a bounce and I don't that was easy shot to defend even if it was a actually shot or if the goalie put his full effort into defending it. My point is that it was unexpected an I think the right action was done.
The first keeper had the chance to stop the ball which he failed.. so the 2nd keeper, to be fair was given an opportunity to stop the ball too.. so I guess theres nothing wrong with that..
The human psychology is quite interesting here. Even though they've been told to just stand still and let the other team score 2 defenders still try to block, 1 sprints back a bit and the keeper still tries to save it.
The one that sprint back i think was bc the guy in yellow disrespected them kicking the ball to their body, knowing they wouldnt react. So i think guy in red got pissed at this ant sprinted back
@@arm0ur_099 he might have done that to not give the other yellow player an assist, better to have as little impact on people betting on the game and such as possible.
allowing a team to score, even out of respect should not be permitted. I mean it ruins a chance at a clean sheet which fucks up both fantasy points and bets placed. There is far to much money at stake to worry about erasing a stupid mistake the opposition made.
sam phillips clearly not for these players, only for greedy, selfish, disrespectful humans beings like you. I support their decision, while it may be one not many would choose they wanted to keep the game fair as they did not feel they deserved that goal so they wanted to keep it even as if it didn't happen.
@@Frostgaming335 the team in red was giving the ball to the team in yellow. This happens, for example, when a player gets injured mid game and the opposite team throws the ball out so he can be attended. The fair thing to do once the match continues is to hand the ball back to them, usually (if not always) to their goalkeeper. So team in red returns ball to team in yellow in a fair play action but score accidentally. So they let themselves get scored to make up for that accidental goal
Regardless of whose mistake it was,they are one team and they play as such.When your rival returns the ball to you as a gesture of fair play, this act shouldn't result into a goal and if it did as in this case, drastic measures must be taken or else shame would haunt those who manipulated and trampled upon the Fair Play code that makes this game a great game.
No, the fair play was when the guy kicked back the ball, but fpr the pver cpnfodense pf the pther goalkeeper ended in a goal. Edot: i didnt realized im replying to a 7 years old comment hshahahhsdjfdksndnfn
I don't know what the complaints are about, he played the ball back to the keeper, it bounced outside the penalty area, it's not like he was putting pressure on the keeper on the back pass, simply poor play from the keeper. That being said, should you allow them to score a goal in response to the accident, yes, the entire situation happened because of an injury in the first place, so you want to return the game to its original state. But there can't be any complaints from the keeper or team after that back pass scored, the goalkeeper simply took a back approach to the ball and he is where the blame lies.
A goal keeper has right let NO ball shoot in ! Do Not insult him! That was an accident and you have to accept it! Do not look for fair with insulting others ! Wrong !
Where's the fair play here? - The goal keeper sucked. The team mates of his, should get angry with him, instead of having pissed of with the scorer. It's a bullshit for the team that scores, to let opponent player to score back, as it's the opponent goalkeeper's stupidity at all. - OK, the players let opponent to score. But why not the goalkeeper? Appearantly the goal keeper really strieved for not receiving the goal. What would happen if he could save it? In overall, the worst and idiot fair play of all times I've ever seen. Full of insincerity.
I'm not sure if the goalkeeper was trying to stop him from scoring,maybe just giving him a challenge or warming up,...cause if he was,he would have been SO stupid!
It is kinda funny, cause at the end, they didn't give the ball back to the other team. they were giving the ball back, but made a goal, let them make a goal and kept the ball with kick off. that's one way for looking fair but not being fair. :)
idiot. There was a foul which you dont see, when the guy booted the ball to the keeper in the first few seconds, thats what he was doing, returning the ball to the other team, but instead, it went over the keeper and went in, thats why the red team let the other team score straight from kick off to make it fair, read the title!
No Chris, the goalie does pretty badly, but he was not expecting a shot, he was well outside his area, because the player was just passing him the ball to restart the game in a sporting way, not because he was out of position, the opposition realise that they have been given an unfair advantage, due to their oppositions sporting treatment of an injury, so they return the goal.
All those people saying that the goalkeeper is crap, it looks pretty windy and many goalkeepers can be done with the bounce. it bounces a few yards a way and manages to pick up a lot of speed and fly over his head. Keeper barely to blame
That goalie should be disciplined. When the Captain of the team makes a decision, the team has to listen. I am glad he failed. All he achieved was make a dick out of himself.
For people who don't get the "fairplay" thing. An example. If a player recieves a head knock in play then the referee is obliged to stop the game to allow treatment, in the old days the game would resume with a drop ball (the ref drops the ball between 2 opposing players who then have to wait for the ball to hit the ground or "bounce" before the aforementioned players attempt to go for the ball each having a 50/50 chance of winning it) As these drop balls are very rarely contested anymore the referee drops the ball and the team who had the injury usually kicks the ball upfield to the opposing goalkeeper, hence the fairplay part, only it kind of went wrong...
Additional, if it is not a head knock then the referee is not obliged to stop the game, but the opposing team can play the ball out for a throw in so there is a break in play and the player can get treatment as what probably happened here, however it is only manners or fairplay you do not recieve an advantage with the resulting throw in and is usually played back to the goalkeeper to start play again.
Oh shit, am I the first getting this recommended after years? Also fuck conceding a goal because of the keeper's mistake. They fair played when they gave the ball away in the first place
I mean if you're the goalkeeper that lets the first goal in. Thats on you, not the bloke in red - either try control it before the ball bounces or stay on your line and let the ball come to you. Made the bloke in red look like an asshole when it was all the goalkeepers fault he put himself in no mans land.
So the goalkeeper sucks and it's the player's fault? I say that ball was pretty easy to catch, i do not believe the player could have made that on purpose, to kick the ball, calculating where it would hit on the ground so it would lob the keeper.... :S ? If the keeper was on the goal he would have easly got the ball, no drama.
the other team didnt deserve that, it was clearly not on purpose and if they have the lip to go and argue with the guy who scored it when he clearly was telling the truth they shouldn't had let them score
Someone enlighten me lol. I’m no football enthusiast. The red team scored in a fair way though. So why did they let the yellow team score for free? (except for the gk tho xd)
They kicked the ball out because of an injured player and he was only suppose to pass it back to them as they do in football, and accidently scored so in the name of fair play they gave them a goal too.
Because the back pass wasn’t an unguarded goal, so I’m tipping the agreement was, “you can go past our defensive, but you have to beat the keeper legitimately”. I love watching this sort of stuff. It’s great for sport.
its still fairplay and they didnt really try to prevent. and they shouldnt even let them score a free goal, it was the goalkeepers fault, the red guy just gave him the ball
It effects the goalkeepers stats. I don't know if you guys realize that. They get commendation for every clean sheet game they play, and they are also receive commendation for whoever has the most clean sheets at the end of the season.
Would be hilarious if the guy on the yellow team ripped off his shirt and did a crazy celebration after scoring that
That comment shows you haven't got the smallest idea about football
😂😂😂😂
Or the red team guy.
@@esticaandres3169 the comment shows how much of a idiot you are
@@esticaandres3169 whatcha gonna do when hulkamania runs wild on you, brother?
Funny how everybody on the red team just agreed on doing nothing, and the goalkeeper is just like "Guys? Where are you guys when I need you!" :D
Funny ?
Or normal
+Aza'gorod the Nightbringer Clean sheet bonus?
+Levi Jaeger It was 3-2 already. No clean sheet.
Because the first goal is the yellow's goalkeeper mistakes
So the second goal, i think the red's keeper was able to save the ball
Because the first keeper tried to save the first shot. It would only be fair of second one tries too.
why did the keeper try to save it though
Chill out bro it’s football who calls opposite sides enemies
Because you have to be a mad man to become a goalkeeper in the first place
Don't think he agreed with the rest of his team to let them score
Wasn't being weak with his teammates lol fair play ball was done not anyone's fault but that keeper that it went in. That bounce was nutty but still not their problem
To not be accused of breaking fair play rules. Letting the opponent score can put you in trouble
imagine how much the keeper would have been hated if he actually saved the shot!!!
The players at Brann said that if the Keeper saved it, they would let them try again, because they didn't want to have 1-0 because of that.
JonnTheOne
@Alek Wolf the ball had gone out of play for an injury, normally a team will play the ball to the opponents. Which this guy tried and the ball bounced over the opposition keeper
@Alek Wolf If I remember correctly there was some kind of injury. Lillestrøm stopped playing. That resulted in a drop. Mjelde was supposed to play it to the opponent keeper. The wind took the ball and Brann scored.
@Jamal Blaze I really dont
I like how he goes "my bad, my bad. I'm just that good, nothing i could do about it"
You missed a "do" in your sentence,but I see what u mean
The keeper who disagreed to let that goal go in was like :- Hey hey my clean sheet is not a joke bruh.
It is not a disagree by GK. It was a 1 on 1 like the previous play that resulted in a goal
He had already conceded 2 😂
Now imagine this happened in the knockout stages of the Champions League, where one of the goals gets an away goal. That would really mess things up :O
The referee could just disallow the goal
@@kalumola5557 it doesn't break any rules tho, he can't disallow it
@@gianvitorodia but he can say it was a foul
@@kalumola5557 where’s the foul?
@@sentientsaladstudios6326 fr wtf is this dude on🤣
That striker’s like: “Let me tell you about the time I dribbled all 11 players from kick off and score.”
🤣
Its not his fault, he kicked the ball to the other team and the goalie failed to catch it.
No, he played a difficult high ball back. If his intention was to give the ball back for fair play, he failed miserably. His own team was pissed at him if you actually watch the video. None of this is FIFA-enforced, it was all legal play, and just the players deciding what they should do.
@@banger2998 sorry not sorry, the player who kicked it back got his whole team mad at him. It was careless, if not malicious. But so what, it's all legal, and his team decided to give a goal back. If it was obviously the GK's fault they wouldn't have done that, Period.
@@banger2998 no.
The kicker's whole team disagrees with you, your use of CAPITAL LETTERS don't save your weak argument.
@@banger2998 you speak like a child, I don't argue with kids. g/l to ya.
GK in green: "There goes my chance to earn a cleansheet"
it stant 3-2
He had already conceded, so no.
Are you a boy called Aidan but your middle name is Jane?
@@MF_JONES sadly my parents gave me a boy name
@@aidanjanemcintosh6919 interesting but you're a Muslim right?
I like that even though no one was marking him, he still managed to deflect it against an opponent.
professionals.
Norwegian league bro.....really bad
its so weird to see players just standing around while the op has the ball. its like time froze or something
thats the point....? they gave the other team to score free goal.
I know, it just looks weird is what im saying
When you play FIFA on beginner
"Op"
ahahahaha. just look at this fan at 1:52 =))))))))
In the changing rooms after the game the teammates hang both goalkeepers
GBStanley44488 o
Yo chill
Bad day?
poor goalkeeper, is the only one to disagree lol
+Jake Muller hes a poor piece of shit
+Jake Muller i imagine he get's a clean sheet bonus. I can imagine he'd be a bit pissed off about being forced to lose out on that. I hope the player who scored covered his loss if no more goals were conceded.
+paddym27 It was 3-2 at that point so the clean sheet was already gone.
+Ken Loves Brissy it's not that the opponents were angry. They had to play it after injury and possession's supposed to go back to the other side. The kick is just a form of courtesy and scoring from that point goes against the point of the ball kick.
He clearly wasn't trying to score when he kicked the ball to the goalie. Nobody bounces a ball that far out and thinks they'll be scoring with a shot from that far out. Just a shit goalie that let in a bad goal trying to save face.
why did the goalie try to catch the ball? he didnt agree with the fair play goal, did he?
I think the object of the "fair goal" was to allow the other team to try to score with only the goalie trying to stop it, not the whole team. Still I don't agree with them doing that though.
Ffollies The goalie(Piotr Lechiewski) didn't agree with the whole fair-play idea, so he actually tried to prevent it from being a goal(which he said in a interview after the game).
Ander Galeatxe because of his record
triXXareN did the red team win the game?
Johirul1993 Yes, 4-3
Funny that the goalkeeper was still like "Don't worry guys, I got it" :D
first goal is from a fair play kick for yellow team but accidentally the goal keeper miss the catch. It's a legal goal, yes. But the captain of red team cannot accept it as a goal (maybe because it's from a fairplay kick) but the ref still announced it as a goal. That's why the red team let the yellow team score a free goal to equalized with them. (sorry for my bad english)
You got it
Hello captain obvious
Thanks for explaining, I'm blind.
The ref had to announce it as goal.
Thank you for explaining! I didn't quite understand.
So am i the only one who's getting this recommended after 9 years🤔
Nope
Why was the other team allowed a free goal? If the keeper sucks and cant keep the ball out, that's his fault.
"fair play" happens after a player is injured. The 1st goal was meant to be a sportsmanlike kick to hand the ball over, and accidentally scored. So they let them get even.
John Walsh-Wadlegger I know what fair play is, but in the video the keeper tries to save the ball. Clearly it was in play and it should count as a goal and the other team should not be given the free goal.
BforBewbies Of course it was in-play. But they just gave back the ball to the other team, it wasn't the intention to score a goal. The goalkeeper was trying to catch the ball, in order to continue play.
MSGhazarian It was in play and did count. No one said they HAD to let the yellow team score, the team in red chose to let their opponents score as they had accidentally beaten a goalkeeper who wasn't expecting a shot.
Dosnt matter. The red team won 5-2
Kickoff glitch!
The funny part is when the keeper (in green) actually tried to save it when the guy ran through but he scored, bet he felt a right mug
im glad they chose fair play, i dislike the anger to the unfortunate scorer also, he didnt mean for it, you could see that on his face, he was embarrsed
Can you explain the situation? Why did all these things happen and What exactly was going on?
For example, a player is down with a injury and the player that has the ball, plays it out of bounds to stop the match, and let the injured player get help.
When the game starts again, it’s the other teams ball. But it would be considered fair play to give the ball back to the team that had possesion. Usually with a long pass to the keeper, so the play «resets».
*"..and finally, they live happily ever after."*
in 2nd Norwegian division...
Fair Play Goal of the CENTURY
Fair Play Goal of the HISTORY :-P
no, that was the goal against ajax...
Keeper miscalculated that bounce it had, and it was a pretty impressive bounce.
shouldn't have let them score - was the keepers fault - love how the second keeper tried to save it - guess he had 1-0 on his coupon
If you read the desc. it was already 4-2 ^_^
Such a shitty way to win a game. Doing this was the in the spirit of the game
@@kingsley3208 you can't say the opponents having a shit keeper isn't in the spirit of the game.
@@arronshepp91 i don't see it that way, and the team didn't either. Was a freak goal, and to let that ruin the rest of the game would have been worse.
What would happen if the away goal rules were in play?
For example, if these two teams have already played a scoreless draw at the home stadium of the yellow team and this was the 2nd leg... the "fair play goal" could mean the red team is out of the competition.
If it was a cup competition, and away goal rules were in play, this would probably not have happened. Perhaps the home team (LSK) would get 2 goals and the away team (Brann) would get 1
Vegard Bratteng brann vant lol
that would be really complicated
ybk360 yet another reason why the away goals rule sucked. They invented it to confirm Barca wining the CL IN 2009 because they would've been out
strongraycool44 :D are u stupid?
First of all everyone understood it was a kick back, meaning the ball real wasn't in play according to the players and its meant to sportsmanship at work. I don't think the goalie was expecting such a bounce and I don't that was easy shot to defend even if it was a actually shot or if the goalie put his full effort into defending it. My point is that it was unexpected an I think the right action was done.
I wanted to see the reactions if the goalkeeper stopped te ball
hahhaha I love how the goalkeeper of the red team is trying to save the situation and tries to save the goal :DD
i love how he rushs like hell to score that goal even though nobody is defending
Keeper was charging in to save🤣
The first keeper had the chance to stop the ball which he failed.. so the 2nd keeper, to be fair was given an opportunity to stop the ball too.. so I guess theres nothing wrong with that..
The human psychology is quite interesting here. Even though they've been told to just stand still and let the other team score 2 defenders still try to block, 1 sprints back a bit and the keeper still tries to save it.
The one that sprint back i think was bc the guy in yellow disrespected them kicking the ball to their body, knowing they wouldnt react. So i think guy in red got pissed at this ant sprinted back
@@arm0ur_099 he might have done that to not give the other yellow player an assist, better to have as little impact on people betting on the game and such as possible.
0:17 "No autographs please, maybe later"
lol why is the keeper trying to save it.
allowing a team to score, even out of respect should not be permitted. I mean it ruins a chance at a clean sheet which fucks up both fantasy points and bets placed. There is far to much money at stake to worry about erasing a stupid mistake the opposition made.
What u`re talking about has nothing to do with the true meaning of sports and fair play.
Professional sport is not the true meaning of sport and fair play.
As soon as money comes into the equation that becomes the ruling motive.
sam phillips clearly not for these players, only for greedy, selfish, disrespectful humans beings like you. I support their decision, while it may be one not many would choose they wanted to keep the game fair as they did not feel they deserved that goal so they wanted to keep it even as if it didn't happen.
its tippeligean 1 out of 2 billion bets are for that league
The last thing the teams should worry about is the gamblers.
greatest thing i have ever seen, it takes a man to decide to do something like that. well done captain
Goalkeeper Klaas-Jan Huntelaar?
The orange keeper looks kind of like him, yeah :-)
Oh shit......
Awesome fair play! that's real football.
Why they let to score yellow team?
@@Frostgaming335 the team in red was giving the ball to the team in yellow. This happens, for example, when a player gets injured mid game and the opposite team throws the ball out so he can be attended. The fair thing to do once the match continues is to hand the ball back to them, usually (if not always) to their goalkeeper. So team in red returns ball to team in yellow in a fair play action but score accidentally. So they let themselves get scored to make up for that accidental goal
@@arm0ur_099 ah okay :D
thanks
@@Frostgaming335 ; )
Why did they let them score? It was goalkeeper mistake. Red player fairly gave him the ball.
You don't know what you're talking about
The Code ...that's why
Regardless of whose mistake it was,they are one team and they play as such.When your rival returns the ball to you as a gesture of fair play, this act shouldn't result into a goal and if it did as in this case, drastic measures must be taken or else shame would haunt those who manipulated and trampled upon the Fair Play code that makes this game a great game.
Windows Sux
this act shouldn't result into a goal - yes, and it shouldn't be a goal. Was it my fault that goalkeeper fucked up? No. Questions?
lastbeer It's One team regardless whose fault it was .
Thank you TH-cam for recommending Norwegian Tippeliga football.
The other teams keeper isn't included in any team meetings
This is the most amazing thing I saw in football. Except goalkeeper of Brann, everyone should be applaused
No, the fair play was when the guy kicked back the ball, but fpr the pver cpnfodense pf the pther goalkeeper ended in a goal.
Edot: i didnt realized im replying to a 7 years old comment hshahahhsdjfdksndnfn
@@pak3ton did u have a stroke while writing that?
@@amirkhan-fp7qc maybe
I don't know what the complaints are about, he played the ball back to the keeper, it bounced outside the penalty area, it's not like he was putting pressure on the keeper on the back pass, simply poor play from the keeper.
That being said, should you allow them to score a goal in response to the accident, yes, the entire situation happened because of an injury in the first place, so you want to return the game to its original state. But there can't be any complaints from the keeper or team after that back pass scored, the goalkeeper simply took a back approach to the ball and he is where the blame lies.
like he planned for it to bounce over the keepers head..
I know right
A goal keeper has right let NO ball shoot in ! Do Not insult him! That was an accident and you have to accept it! Do not look for fair with insulting others ! Wrong !
Goalie is to blame for not being paying attention to how far he was off his line.
He still was struggling to dribble past static players
Where's the fair play here?
- The goal keeper sucked. The team mates of his, should get angry with him, instead of having pissed of with the scorer. It's a bullshit for the team that scores, to let opponent player to score back, as it's the opponent goalkeeper's stupidity at all.
- OK, the players let opponent to score. But why not the goalkeeper? Appearantly the goal keeper really strieved for not receiving the goal. What would happen if he could save it?
In overall, the worst and idiot fair play of all times I've ever seen. Full of insincerity.
Instead of making all this drama, why didnt they just cancel the accidental goal.
for what reason would they cancel it. it was a legitimate goal
It's not rules of the game to kick the ball back to the opposition, it's only common practice and respect.
it was legit goal, but its like sucker punching someone in boxing. so other team just let him score for free.
I'm not sure if the goalkeeper was trying to stop him from scoring,maybe just giving him a challenge or warming up,...cause if he was,he would have been SO stupid!
Big teams will never do this kind of fair play. They forget about humanity
Leeds and Aston Villa did this a few years ago, it's one of the most viewed football videos on TH-cam?
PSG aren't the only big team in this world
@@dringypie maybe he meant big as in Madrid, Barca, Bayern big not just any top 5 league club. Idk tho until OP replies
because that'd be really dumb, why would they give the enemy team a goal when the gk made a mistake
Who came here after Arsenal's goal against Man U last night 👀
Lame. It’s not the other teams fault that their goalie lacks depth perception.
No fair play to gk XD
great goal messi
lol
Fair Match of the Year!! The award is delivered!! :)
It is kinda funny, cause at the end, they didn't give the ball back to the other team.
they were giving the ball back, but made a goal, let them make a goal and kept the ball with kick off. that's one way for looking fair but not being fair. :)
I like how the keeper's all "naaah, fuck that, no way"
its goalkeeper's fault.
Wtf are they doing, high level football... not.
idiot. There was a foul which you dont see, when the guy booted the ball to the keeper in the first few seconds, thats what he was doing, returning the ball to the other team, but instead, it went over the keeper and went in, thats why the red team let the other team score straight from kick off to make it fair, read the title!
and way the fuck are watching a video of a football match if you dont even understand the rules of football, you fuck wit!
***** Theres no rule saying they have to let them score though
***** No but it was an act of fair play. Read the title knobhead.
Superettan
People like this makes the game even more beautiful :')
No Chris, the goalie does pretty badly, but he was not expecting a shot, he was well outside his area, because the player was just passing him the ball to restart the game in a sporting way, not because he was out of position, the opposition realise that they have been given an unfair advantage, due to their oppositions sporting treatment of an injury, so they return the goal.
All those people saying that the goalkeeper is crap, it looks pretty windy and many goalkeepers can be done with the bounce. it bounces a few yards a way and manages to pick up a lot of speed and fly over his head. Keeper barely to blame
i mean... the 1 st goal... the goalkeeper sucks A LOT!!!!
Haha, thats true, he played at my team (IN my city) and he made so much more mistakes
+Montserrad Manzo i agree. its easy to say
That goalie should be disciplined. When the Captain of the team makes a decision, the team has to listen. I am glad he failed. All he achieved was make a dick out of himself.
that goal keeping error...but the captain had good leaderships,show his character.....
For people who don't get the "fairplay" thing. An example. If a player recieves a head knock in play then the referee is obliged to stop the game to allow treatment, in the old days the game would resume with a drop ball (the ref drops the ball between 2 opposing players who then have to wait for the ball to hit the ground or "bounce" before the aforementioned players attempt to go for the ball each having a 50/50 chance of winning it) As these drop balls are very rarely contested anymore the referee drops the ball and the team who had the injury usually kicks the ball upfield to the opposing goalkeeper, hence the fairplay part, only it kind of went wrong...
Additional, if it is not a head knock then the referee is not obliged to stop the game, but the opposing team can play the ball out for a throw in so there is a break in play and the player can get treatment as what probably happened here, however it is only manners or fairplay you do not recieve an advantage with the resulting throw in and is usually played back to the goalkeeper to start play again.
Oh shit, am I the first getting this recommended after years?
Also fuck conceding a goal because of the keeper's mistake. They fair played when they gave the ball away in the first place
Acaba de pasar la misma wea aquí en Chile contra Bolivia 💀💀💀 (bueno casi, porque Bolivia la metió por cuenta propia)
Couldn't the red team be denied the goal? It is the yellow team's goalkeeper's mistake but the red team's goalkeeper shouldn't be punished for it.
I mean if you're the goalkeeper that lets the first goal in. Thats on you, not the bloke in red - either try control it before the ball bounces or stay on your line and let the ball come to you. Made the bloke in red look like an asshole when it was all the goalkeepers fault he put himself in no mans land.
hahah hes so happy he scored
So the goalkeeper sucks and it's the player's fault?
I say that ball was pretty easy to catch, i do not believe the player could have made that on purpose, to kick the ball, calculating where it would hit on the ground so it would lob the keeper.... :S ?
If the keeper was on the goal he would have easly got the ball, no drama.
that was unfair. and stupid for the players to let them do that
the other team didnt deserve that, it was clearly not on purpose and if they have the lip to go and argue with the guy who scored it when he clearly was telling the truth they shouldn't had let them score
Haha this is awesome, the players worked it out fairly. I like how the keeper tried to stop it.
Hmm they shouldn't have let the team score, bescuse the first goal is the keeper's fault
Why did they do that
Simply that was a goal, he had not cheated !!
I don't get the purpose
it would be funny if the guy in the yellow missed the goal and went over the bar
Someone enlighten me lol. I’m no football enthusiast. The red team scored in a fair way though. So why did they let the yellow team score for free? (except for the gk tho xd)
They kicked the ball out because of an injured player and he was only suppose to pass it back to them as they do in football, and accidently scored so in the name of fair play they gave them a goal too.
@@basquat76 oh i see. Now everything makes sense lol. Thanks for the reply dude!
Is this a game of FIFA with all the sliders put into your favour? The keeper was to blame for the first one. The defence for the second.
i don't see the point. the referee just simply blow out the first goal and re-kick a freekick then everything is solved. waste of time
+Ambrose Ho it wasn't a freekick.
I wished the other team missed that would have been hilarious
Because the back pass wasn’t an unguarded goal, so I’m tipping the agreement was, “you can go past our defensive, but you have to beat the keeper legitimately”. I love watching this sort of stuff. It’s great for sport.
Eminem : Look, If You had one shoot?
No. Goal scorer should not have shot the ball with so fast speed at fair play.
They should have a backup goalkeeper if he was injured.... That goal was fair and square
Obviously someone didn't tell the goalie! lol
personally I prefer Ajax' fair play. It's not a fair play to me, if the keeper still tries to catch the ball.
The goalkeeper had a clean sheet bonus, and if the result was 1-0, well thats the reason why he tryed to stop it.
The defender and the keeper didn't want to fair play.
0:50 The look of " fuck, i need a new goal keeper"
the goal keeper was not spirit of fair play game.
it wasn't really fair play because a defender and the goal keeper tried to prevent the goal
its still fairplay and they didnt really try to prevent.
and they shouldnt even let them score a free goal, it was the goalkeepers fault, the red guy just gave him the ball
So one bullshit moment led to another bullshit moment. You play to the rules not etiquette.
Agreed.
It effects the goalkeepers stats. I don't know if you guys realize that. They get commendation for every clean sheet game they play, and they are also receive commendation for whoever has the most clean sheets at the end of the season.
The goalkeeper wanted a clean sheet I think.
The keeper didn't get the memo.