Seismic Analysis (Single Point Response Spectrum analysis) of Vertical Frame Structure, Part-2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @HYDENMANOJM
    @HYDENMANOJM หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you for your informative video, upload video for numerical ways to do seismic analysis

  • @sidibomma15
    @sidibomma15 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation sir

  • @ciciinfant2121
    @ciciinfant2121 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your video Sir. Could you please display a video for the base isolation of the same above structure?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome. We will check if feasible. Base isolation is vast topic.

  • @kashifsalman2653
    @kashifsalman2653 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the informative video. I would like to know how the directional acceleration is higher at the lower floor and it goes on decreasing along the height of the structure?

  • @unpredictable2man
    @unpredictable2man 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for sharing.
    Will you explain how to get frequency domain for input as Time history does not work here

  • @vahidamjadi9507
    @vahidamjadi9507 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for informative video.is it possible to combine static structural results with response spectrum?using pre-stressed setting does not seem to sum up the results (VM stress).

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can combine results after getting solution of two different analysis. Check this tutorial, th-cam.com/video/2oLs7ES0hJc/w-d-xo.html

  • @JearlJearl
    @JearlJearl ปีที่แล้ว

    sir please make a video on how to draw geometry in design modeler or discovery

  • @nishanthg4705
    @nishanthg4705 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to evaluate the stresses developed after response spectrum analysis ?
    You told in the process flow that these stresses must be included, where should it be included ?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, these seismic stresses need to exctract and compare with allowable stresses or yeild limit of the material.

  • @zilurrehmaan
    @zilurrehmaan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why to add Point Mass?
    Please explain the reason and methodology to add Point Mass in the simulation.

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Point mass is used to attach the mass in the system. The mounting equipment which are not required to model can be idealized using point mass.

  • @KanwaljeetJaura
    @KanwaljeetJaura 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We need to give only point mass or we can also provide uniform mass of components to be placed on structure?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      On point mass you need to define weight of the equipment's.

  • @sovankardolui5818
    @sovankardolui5818 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    sir from where did you acquired the seismic data

  • @krittikaag
    @krittikaag 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Sir, could you elaborate or share any document on calculation of the acceleration with respect to the frequency; that you have used as an input for the response spectrum in ansys at 17:11 in the video. Your help will be of great importance to my research - Thank you

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, I had assumed acceleration Vs frequency data for explaination of video. You can refer any relavant standard or will get from manufacturer of the respective equipment based on seismic zone.

    • @krittikaag
      @krittikaag 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@graspengineering9249 Thank you replying. However, the results of my hand calculations as per IS 1893 are different as compared to the simulation on ansys, Though I have input the acceleration values as given in IS and put in a scale factor of 9806.6 (my model is in mm), I have turned on large deflections and perform using SRSS method. It will be helpful if you could also share the possible reasons for this great deviation between the results, (Does that have to do with the mass and stiffness matrix in Ansys)?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@krittikaag Hello , First please check the natural frequency from modal analysis & with hand calculations. Also check mass participation is more than 90 % or not.

    • @krittikaag
      @krittikaag 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 Thank you for being so responsive. It is strange but the model is working for a building with 2 degree of freedom, my calculations are matching ansys output. However, the frequency and displacement is not matching for 3 DOF using the same setup and same calculation procedure. Ansys is giving a frequency (mode 1) of 14,5Hz and calculation shows 10Hz. Thus, displacement as per ansys is 2,9mm and hand calculation is 6,9mm (The mass participation is 93% in the ansys model). Is there anything else that I could adjust? or could there be another reason for such deviation?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@krittikaag, for simple structure like yours, it should match natural frequency. Displacement in modal analysis is virtual displacement hence not worries. Check material details & try to match with simple frequency formula.

  • @konderuanil
    @konderuanil 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    how can we perform same analysis in APDL ( I mean coupling analysis). Please make video on APDL coupling analysis. Thanks

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can refer video of APDL in description link for coupling analysis.

  • @chanhaw5558
    @chanhaw5558 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I get the information regarding the structural dimension, material properties and any other details as I would like to rerun the simulation to make comparison as my practice purpose. Thank you

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We did assumptions on dimension for explaining the seismic analysis. So please do assumption at your end and let us know if you are facing any difficulties. thanks

  • @SJr9869
    @SJr9869 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello there, are the acceleration values already given when uploading the data for the response spectrum ? Or we need to calculate them?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, we assume the acceleration values for simulation purpose. In actual, you should get this spectrum values from respective geography zonal area.

    • @SJr9869
      @SJr9869 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 thank you so much !

  • @rajshekhar6120
    @rajshekhar6120 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to made
    this geometry exacltly

  • @rohangraikar5382
    @rohangraikar5382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    SIR please give me some guidelines regarding structural analysis using base isolation in ansys

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Structural analysis using base isolation in FEA is depends on so many factors and their modeling/idealization is difficult task. It depends on selection on appropriate base isolation, uses & load types, etc. Will upload video on base isolation selection guidelines. You can also refer video for base modeling in ansys: th-cam.com/video/pihYx0a3t-4/w-d-xo.html

    • @rohangraikar5382
      @rohangraikar5382 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 ok sir

  • @pritamkumarpatel9629
    @pritamkumarpatel9629 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can u pls explain how we will extract the forces on the supports?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can use APDL script for forces and moment extraction like *get,my_fsumx_event_DW_Left_1_Z,fsum,0,item,fx ....you can repeat this for all forces and moments by changing, fx, fy, fz, mx, my, mz.

  • @hansenm6910
    @hansenm6910 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir, is it possible to increase the allowable data points for response spectrum (sprs)? The ansys limit is 100points.

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is difficult to enter more than 100 points. You need to filter the data points in excel and use envelope of spectrum values. Remove the repetitive data Frequncy vs accn data. We will upload blogpost on same on our blog soon.

  • @sanjaykumaryadav3186
    @sanjaykumaryadav3186 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Frequency are closely spaced meaning that while taking data frequently the acceleration changes. If acceleration changes after more cycle than it is far spaced am I right

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please kindly check first part, We had mentioned closely & separated frequency details. Generally modes with closed freq. is function of damping ration & if damping ratio is less than 2%, closely spaced frequency means which are within 10% of each other.

  • @МихаилПоликарпов-ф4м
    @МихаилПоликарпов-ф4м 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cant find Beam results (stress,bending moment,normal force etc.) in Response Spectrum, please,help me,where are they?

  • @МихаилПоликарпов-ф4м
    @МихаилПоликарпов-ф4м 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello,1.Сan you perform the response spectrum analysis in APDL using GUI?
    2.Can you explain how to perform beam results in Response Spectrum Analysis?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Okay

    • @rajanarjunsharma6612
      @rajanarjunsharma6612 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      hi.. How did you perform response spectrun analysis in APDL using GUI? can you please share with me......

    • @МихаилПоликарпов-ф4м
      @МихаилПоликарпов-ф4м 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rajanarjunsharma6612 I have s successfull solution of this Problem. Example of My script:
      /NOPR ! Suppress printing of UNDO process
      /PMACRO ! Echo following commands to log
      !FINISH ! Make sure we are at BEGIN level
      /CLEAR,NOSTART ! Clear model since no SAVE found
      ! WE SUGGEST YOU REMOVE THIS LINE AND THE FOLLOWING STARTUP LINES
      /input,menust,tmp,''
      /GRA,POWER
      /GST,ON
      /PLO,INFO,3
      /GRO,CURL,ON
      /CPLANE,1
      /REPLOT,RESIZE
      WPSTYLE,,,,,,,,0
      /PREP7
      !*
      ET,1,BEAM189
      !*
      ET,2,MASS21
      !*
      ET,3,MASS21
      !*
      KEYOPT,2,1,0
      KEYOPT,2,2,0
      KEYOPT,2,3,2
      !*
      KEYOPT,3,1,0
      KEYOPT,3,2,0
      KEYOPT,3,3,2
      !*
      !*
      R,1,100,
      !*
      !*
      R,2,200,
      !*
      !*
      !*
      !*
      MPTEMP,,,,,,,,
      MPTEMP,1,0
      MPDATA,EX,1,,2e11
      MPDATA,PRXY,1,,0.3
      MPTEMP,,,,,,,,
      MPTEMP,1,0
      MPDATA,DENS,1,,1e-07
      SECTYPE, 1, BEAM, ASEC, , 0
      SECOFFSET, CENT
      SECDATA,2.242e-03,4e-07,0,4e-07,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0
      K, ,,,,
      K, ,,2,,
      K, ,2,2,,
      LSTR, 1, 2
      LSTR, 2, 3
      TYPE, 1
      MAT, 1
      REAL, 1
      ESYS, 0
      SECNUM, 1
      LESIZE,ALL,0.1, , , , , , ,1

      LMESH,ALL
      TYPE, 2
      REAL, 1

      E, 2
      REAL, 2

      E, 42

      ANTYPE,2
      !*
      !*
      MODOPT,LANB,2
      EQSLV,SPAR
      MXPAND,2,,,YES
      LUMPM,0
      PSTRES,0
      !*
      MODOPT,LANB,2,0,0, ,OFF
      FINISH
      /SOL
      DK,1, ,0, ,0,ALL, , , , , ,
      DL,ALL, ,UZ,0
      /STATUS,SOLU
      SOLVE
      /OUT,SCRATCH
      *GET,MODC_1,MODE,1,MCOEF
      *GET,MODC_2,MODE,2,MCOEF
      *GET,PFAC_1,MODE,1,PFACT
      *GET,PFAC_2,MODE,2,PFACT
      FINISH
      /OUT,SCRATCH
      /SOLUTION
      ANTYPE,SPECTRUM ! PERFORM SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
      SPOPT,SPRS,2,1,1 ! SINGLE POINT RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
      CQC,0.001,DISP, ,
      SVTYPE,3 ! DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE SPECTRUM
      DMPRAT,0.02
      FREQ,0.874,2.683,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

      SV,0,0.1053,0.034,
      SED,1,0,0
      OUTPR,NSOL,ALL
      OUTRES,ALL,ALL
      SOLVE
      FINISH
      /POST1
      /INPUT,,mcom
      !*
      /EFACET,1
      PLNSOL, U,X, 0,1.0

  • @tyrian007
    @tyrian007 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can we do fatigue analysis in this module?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes you can

    • @tyrian007
      @tyrian007 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 can you send a pic or guide me to the fatigue tool option?

  • @bastianren
    @bastianren 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Sir, if i use Rose combination method, ¿ don't i need to define damping parameters (alfa,beta and damping ratio)?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, for CQC method only you will need to define damping parameters. While if you have damping parameters, you can use for ROSE method too.

    • @bastianren
      @bastianren 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 Sorry sir, ¿then Dont i need damping parameters for rose combination methods?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bastianren Damping Parameter is assumptions based on Equipment & loads. If you don't have then okay, it will be more conservative analysis approach.

  • @Ramkumar-cr8yk
    @Ramkumar-cr8yk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you send the project wbpz file

  • @puppallamuralikrishna8743
    @puppallamuralikrishna8743 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear sir , I have some doubts in seismic analysis , I am trying to do directional combination for seismic analysis, how I can combine three directions. Please help on this. Thanks in advance.

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, You can apply in three direction like X, Y & Z axis respective directions. Spectrum is nothing but seismic response in single or multiple axes. Based on spectrum you can select combination like ROSE, CQC, SRSS as mentioned in introduction video.

    • @puppallamuralikrishna8743
      @puppallamuralikrishna8743 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 Thanks for your response, I am trying to do load combination. For example I am trying to do load combination for Dead Weight load case , Design pressure and Seismic load (x+y+z). Please explain how we can do by using APDL commands in workbench.

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can apply dead load, pressure loads and perform static analysis & then do pre-stress modal and then do response spectrum connected with modal analysis.

    • @puppallamuralikrishna8743
      @puppallamuralikrishna8743 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 Thanks you for your help

  • @nomaansiddiqui700
    @nomaansiddiqui700 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir which software is this

  • @sabiharekha
    @sabiharekha 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    If we want to take the real earthquake data, there is time history data but no frequency data. how can we do that?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello & Greetings ! You need to convert time domain into frequency domain.

    • @sabiharekha
      @sabiharekha 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@graspengineering9249 can you help me to do this? Can you give me a video? I need urgently for my research work.please..

    • @kandamurugesan143
      @kandamurugesan143 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sabiharekha hi ..did you get the answer for your query . because i am having the same question like how to convert the frequency domain. as per my understanding .. frequency is 1/T (time ) .. we can calculate the frequency value from the time domain value .. please suggest if you get any other way..

    • @unpredictable2man
      @unpredictable2man 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kandamurugesan143 ......did you get the answer

  • @onurerdogan4020
    @onurerdogan4020 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is the point mass value 100 kg?

    • @graspengineering9249
      @graspengineering9249  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      In relastic frame may have some components, which we assumed by point mass. It is used for explanation purpose.