It is a great explanation. The conceptual issue not broached is that we are talking about banks. In a banking model the borrowed money used to boost the ROE is actually deposits, considered a liability of the bank. Depositors are investors, though most folks who put money in a bank don't know it. In investment banking the depositors are typically institutional investors or the super rich, and they think of themselves--or should--as investors.
I wish you were my Financial Management tutor at university, I've been taught more in ten minutes than in an hour seminar. Great vids, keep them coming!
A return achieved on a mix of debt and equity is not properly a return on equity. For the avoidance of confusion, it is probably better to confine the use of the term strictly to the return achieved on shareholder's equity. Return on capital can be used to describe the return achieved on debt and equity.
Certainly an accurate calculation of ROE can help predict the outcome of an investment (ROI) especially with an experienced Broker or management. I feel this has been a contributing factor to my increase in ROI since I started investing with the right team.
For me Portfolio management helps me articulate the right span to trade,either long term or short term,and the securities to Invest in for a greater chance at profit making.
I've heard of account management and what it entails, but never given it a try,so I would like to know what are the agreement that should be met? Is there a commission price? And can I Participate from here?
Quick question, and I'm a bit new to this - but are corporate loans like your 970k example provided with an expectation to pay back some of the capital as well, or do banks providely these happily on interest-only terms? The reason I ask is that you mentioned that the interest itself is tax deductable (and presumably is a cost against revenue) - but does the capital repayment get accounted for in the same way? If not, it'd be interesting to know how much this impacts the true profit figure & ROE
Don't quite understand it. ROE=net income/equity. Net income is already after interest payment, isn't it? EBIT-Interest-tax=net income (p.a.t). So why does a big interest expense matter for ROE, since it is after interest profit, not before?
@@keno9964 Not necessarily. The presenter was including all sources of capital - both debt and equity - in the "E" of ROE when he should really have only been including equity.
One important thing to be mentioned additionally, is that the cost of debt has to be low.... High cost of debt aka interest charges, will be unable to assist in this type of financial engineering as the debt costs would itself eat up into the net profitability margin of the company.
This great to know. The question is, where can we see this information on individual companies ? Is it from balance sheets ? It would be great to see you working this out on a real example having got hold of a company's data.
Custard the Cat yes you answered the question yourself. The parameters used in calculating ROE can be found on balance sheets of financial statements. Also you can find ROE of companies in financial databases such as OSIRIS and FAME
It's a little dodgy this stuff of return on equity. I mean, if the company has too many liabilities, the ROE will be high because there is too little equity. I rather using return on assets in combination with assets to equity. The first is the efficiency compared to the real investment used in a business, and the second is a measure of how much the company has in comparison of how much it owes.
Well, high roe with tolerable roa may indicate what company expands really fast using debt. You may assume grow will only accelerate after company get rid of their debt, so it's a good long term investment
you talk about profit and then say return on investment.the profit a company makes has no bearing on stockholders return if they pay a dividend that lowers the stock price which is NOT a return,that is a loss.
It is a great explanation. The conceptual issue not broached is that we are talking about banks. In a banking model the borrowed money used to boost the ROE is actually deposits, considered a liability of the bank. Depositors are investors, though most folks who put money in a bank don't know it. In investment banking the depositors are typically institutional investors or the super rich, and they think of themselves--or should--as investors.
I really would love to use an expletive here, this tutorial is effing brilliant. You're giving us gold Tim...keep it up old bean!
Even though i have never been to UK, but i found your vidoes are pretty relevent to huge ranges of audience all over the world
I wish you were my Financial Management tutor at university, I've been taught more in ten minutes than in an hour seminar. Great vids, keep them coming!
Simple and clear explanations
Cheers , great video - talking my accountancy exams and this drills home the use of ratios! Will be tuning into the next vid.
What an excellent teacher, excellent! Very enjoyful videos too!
Tks for ur guidance
Well, yours are the most informative. Period.
It has been several years, but you knowledge still is helping lots of amateur investors. Hope you're safe and alright. c:
Thanks Tim. Literally learn so much about investment from your videos
A return achieved on a mix of debt and equity is not properly a return on equity. For the avoidance of confusion, it is probably better to confine the use of the term strictly to the return achieved on shareholder's equity. Return on capital can be used to describe the return achieved on debt and equity.
You are great teacher.
Good Work Tim ! ! ! ! !
Excellent as always. Thank you!
These vids are great. Thanks so much. Making studying the IMC a lot easier!
excellent Vid, keep up with the good work, really enjoyed
08:25 For solvency, Debt / Equity is 32% ( 10x over , 2.5 - 3 the normal limit ) But, thanks for the other math explanation
Great vids, keep them coming!.....EXCELLENT
this guy is amazing thank you so much
Sir you are just great. Thank you so much.
Very well explained!
I like this guy, well spoken and well knowledgeable.
Brilliant video's thanks!
Excellent video
i love this guy
Totally understood
Excellent!
Thank you for your teachings, please keep on.
thanks great videos
Excellent. I wish you were my university lecturer.
BTW, really like your videos :)
Please do differentiate between Return on Capital Employed) with ROE (Return on Equity). There IS confusion here. Thanks
Certainly an accurate calculation of ROE can help predict the outcome of an investment (ROI) especially with an experienced Broker or management. I feel this has been a contributing factor to my increase in ROI since I started investing with the right team.
Most definitely.
For me Portfolio management helps me articulate the right span to trade,either long term or short term,and the securities to Invest in for a greater chance at profit making.
Hello Alex.
Am from Vietnam,and it's been quite a struggle for me manoeuvring the foreign exchange market, there are a lot of things I don't know.
I've heard of account management and what it entails, but never given it a try,so I would like to know what are the agreement that should be met? Is there a commission price? And can I Participate from here?
Hi.. can you please do a video of ROIC? there are many versions out there. Thanks
cheers mate
Quick question, and I'm a bit new to this - but are corporate loans like your 970k example provided with an expectation to pay back some of the capital as well, or do banks providely these happily on interest-only terms? The reason I ask is that you mentioned that the interest itself is tax deductable (and presumably is a cost against revenue) - but does the capital repayment get accounted for in the same way? If not, it'd be interesting to know how much this impacts the true profit figure & ROE
Don't quite understand it. ROE=net income/equity. Net income is already after interest payment, isn't it? EBIT-Interest-tax=net income (p.a.t). So why does a big interest expense matter for ROE, since it is after interest profit, not before?
I had heard the speaker mention Net Assets not Net Income.
Exactly
Aren't you conflating the term of ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) with ROE (Return on Equity)?
I too thought the same , because interest is always deducted to calculate profit after tax .
@@keno9964 Not necessarily. The presenter was including all sources of capital - both debt and equity - in the "E" of ROE when he should really have only been including equity.
theres another way to undertand it. the smallest the equitty, (even if theres a lot of doubt) the biggest the effect.
Why have you not had any recent videos?
He works for Killik & Co now, he’s still doing videos on their channel!
One important thing to be mentioned additionally, is that the cost of debt has to be low.... High cost of debt aka interest charges, will be unable to assist in this type of financial engineering as the debt costs would itself eat up into the net profitability margin of the company.
This great to know. The question is, where can we see this information on individual companies ? Is it from balance sheets ? It would be great to see you working this out on a real example having got hold of a company's data.
Custard the Cat yes you answered the question yourself. The parameters used in calculating ROE can be found on balance sheets of financial statements. Also you can find ROE of companies in financial databases such as OSIRIS and FAME
In an example in the latter part of the video, will the amount of 31200 be the equity of next year?
Nice
is this the same as return on shareholders funds ?
Thank you sir, clear explanation.
great
ur right, for every one pound share holders invest they get back 153 poounds
Hi Im greateful for a response pls! - is sirius minerals PLC an example of good or bad debt for the next 1-2 decades?..
You should invest in the Galactic Mining Corporation instead.
impressed with that calculation of 4% of £970k
Legend
Wat is the denomanator when calculating ROE. Is it total capital employed or is it equity employed. U seem to b using total capital as the denomanator
i also get confused on this part.
So is the return on equity in this example 104%?
What is the difference between ROI and ROE? Isn't equity just equivalent to investment?
Very interesting videos and easy explanations, but I wish you have Russian accent instead of British:)
A+!!! ROE without knowing debt management effectiveness is of little value.
there is no return on a stock,y dont you mention this?
If my lecturer explains such as this I would have no problem with attendance...
So buy companies with zero debt and high RoE....is it?
Great video but technically anything multiplied by 100% is itself since 100% is 1
Hey there! Can i get your channel? It seems you don't use it anymore?
"bang for the bucks good" way to explain
It's a little dodgy this stuff of return on equity. I mean, if the company has too many liabilities, the ROE will be high because there is too little equity. I rather using return on assets in combination with assets to equity. The first is the efficiency compared to the real investment used in a business, and the second is a measure of how much the company has in comparison of how much it owes.
Well, high roe with tolerable roa may indicate what company expands really fast using debt. You may assume grow will only accelerate after company get rid of their debt, so it's a good long term investment
I dont get english when you plane me
If they make a loss, the whole equity is wiped out.
Sup, have you wondered this program called the Intellitus Cash System? (Google it). My uncle says it makes people lots of cold hard cash.
I see you look like Steven Job
shareholders do not get any of the profit,what the hell are you talking about?
r on e is rubbish.
you talk about profit and then say return on investment.the profit a company makes has no bearing on
stockholders return if they pay a dividend that lowers the stock price which is NOT a return,that is a loss.
The British make excellent teachers. I will have my children schooled in Great Britain.
Please don't generalize on just one individual. Not every single lecturer or teacher in the UK educates like this speaker.
no
equity is on b/s