This Water Engine Will DESTROY The Entire Car Industry!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 พ.ย. 2023
  • Imagine you could drive your car around all week without spending a single dime on gasoline. Well, that is becoming a reality by the day. One of the most popular car brands in the world has just made a groundbreaking innovation: cars that run on water. Experts have admitted that this technology has the potential to revolutionize the entire auto industry in ways you never imagined. What is the technology behind this groundbreaking innovation, and what car brand is responsible? How will this new invention affect the future of the car industry and the world at large?
    Subscribe Here ➡ / @voyagerspace
    For copyright contact ➡ / @voyagerspace
    #Voyager #Space
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 434

  • @OttoHunt
    @OttoHunt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Calling it a water engine is not accurate. It is a hydrogen engine. It takes a lot of energy (electricity) to get hydrogen from water.

    • @wilsjane
      @wilsjane 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Exactly and due to the efficiency losses, we will get back less than we put in.

    • @thedubwhisperer2157
      @thedubwhisperer2157 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@wilsjane Except on planet TH-cam, where entirely different laws of physics exist...

    • @jeffreykidwell3335
      @jeffreykidwell3335 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@wilsjane It's not about getting back more than you put in. It's about getting back what you need to propel a car. So long as the total cost to produce what you " need " is less than current cars costs to operate.

    • @MrAnonymousme10
      @MrAnonymousme10 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But it has great potential in future. It can solve future wars too. Like resources wars. If renewable energy became cheaper and scientists find a solution to harness tidal energy. Imagine a small country surrounded by ocean and has tidal energy plants and connected to Hydrogen producing plant near seas. That nation will be self sufficient. No more need for resources like fossil fuel that few nation has and fought war on it.

    • @lucusrose
      @lucusrose 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My question is, how pure does the water used have to be? Wouldn't impurities affect the efficiency of the gas production and create a coating on the processing surface that needs to be cleaned off?

  • @jayairBofR
    @jayairBofR 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Been around for 50 years, but in the past they killed the people who developed it.

    • @scottcarr3264
      @scottcarr3264 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Correct, Stanley Meyer it seems was Assassinated to Stop this getting to Market.

    • @timwolf5742
      @timwolf5742 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You didn't listen to @arthurlincoln220:
      Only one slight problem is producing the electrical power to separate the Hydrogen and Oxygen ,it would be a very heavy load on the engine just to run the generator for electrolysis which would also add extra weight to the vehicle.Its the age old dream of perpetual motion which can never exist.

  • @berndgrabitz
    @berndgrabitz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    a steam engine runs on water, but you need a stove too😊

  • @raulnieves6231
    @raulnieves6231 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

    They have this since the 60s

    • @LaganaFam
      @LaganaFam 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly lol I was like wtf is everyone blind to the cia seizures of these kinda breakthroughs to sustain the oil/gas companies

    • @jbrown3160
      @jbrown3160 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I want to say the 50's but facts for the 60's for sure & they was killed or either bought out for the invention SMH

    • @JustinJJHCS1
      @JustinJJHCS1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Inveters where first murdered then called insane then the governments made it national security threat.. now they have successfully made water a commodity they are rolling out technology that has been available since 1885.. this

    • @toddjensen692
      @toddjensen692 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ww2

    • @adamrandall5967
      @adamrandall5967 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Innovation just gets Literally Frogmarched by Corporate Militarisation, for example recently Mz. Eesha Khare’s ‘Flexible Capacitor’ 🚸⚠️
      The Utube “Version”, is presented to appear it’s not yet viable 🚸⚠️
      #rosakiore ☂️ 3:12

  • @clarencewhite1219
    @clarencewhite1219 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Did not find in news search. Please provide source documentation.

    • @wilsjane
      @wilsjane 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LMAO

  • @josemathew9087
    @josemathew9087 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Sodium in pellet form can be kept in plastic tubes. In a closed chamber, water can be sprayed over Sodium to produce Hydrogen to run engines or fuel cells. The effluent Sodium Hydroxide can eloctrolised to extract Sodium for further use. Sodium will act as energy carrier.

  • @MrDenniswoo
    @MrDenniswoo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This technology was existed long time ago, but the inventor was murdered.

    • @engineeringtheweirdguy2103
      @engineeringtheweirdguy2103 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It didn’t. And he wasn’t. Paranoia and nausea are both common symptoms of a stroke, which the autopsy revealed is what happened. It would have been more surprising if he hadn’t shouted “they poisoned me!”. There are many, easily accessible poisons out there that don’t have movie classic symptoms giving the victim time to not only realise but declare they’ve been poisoned. Apart from the fact no poison that generates vomiting are undetectable in an autopsy.

  • @boudewijnj.m.kegels5198
    @boudewijnj.m.kegels5198 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    You need energy to split the water (H2O) in H2 and O2 (2 H2O -> 2H2 + O2). And this proces of chemical analysis costs more energy than the synthesis that takes place in the combustion chamber delivers to drive the car. Tanking H2 on the other hand has the advantage you don't need additional batteries to fuel the analysis that has to take place on the water before it enters the cylinders. In stead of driving on water (H2O) you can better drive your car on the energy stored in the batteries that was meant for the water analysis: more efficient driving because there's no heat loss in the process of analysis, nor in the cylinders (after the synthesis that released the energy).

    • @user-rs5ip8qc4u
      @user-rs5ip8qc4u 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In other words ...this is the purpose of a battery?

    • @katkit4281
      @katkit4281 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@user-rs5ip8qc4u In other words you will get more milage by just hooking up the battery to the car directly than using the battery to split the water molecules and use the hydrogen to run the car.

    • @user-rs5ip8qc4u
      @user-rs5ip8qc4u 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @katkit4281 exactly what I said

    • @AwesomeBlackDude
      @AwesomeBlackDude 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@katkit4281it's bring us back to the diesel engines that can run off of cooking oil. 😅

    • @matterofrights2344
      @matterofrights2344 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure how much I would trust a person's criticism that doesn't know the difference between analysis and electrolysis.

  • @joeykkwong6781
    @joeykkwong6781 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    during electrolysis conversion of water into hydrogen and oxygen. would that cause corrosion to take place,, how would they deal with the corrosion issue caused by loss of electrons ? also both oxygen and hydrogen will be used in the combustion chamber, how will they allocate the correct mixture ratio of hydrogen to oxygen in the combustion chamber to generate water vapours?

  • @maalat
    @maalat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What if Toyota succeeds? Like Ford… not afraid to jump to another level and to really do something to eliminate massive carbon accumulation. The rest of the car manufacturers will follow and perhaps improve the design for water fuel.

  • @terryflint7557
    @terryflint7557 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Since you need high voltage electrolysis to generate hydrogen how would you start the car? Would you need to supply the electrolysis prior to ignition and if so how long would it take to generate enough hydrogen for initial ignition?

    • @gene4094
      @gene4094 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      There is another way to create hydrogen, from water splitting. This electrolysis reaction creates less energy than the energy it creates,thus is worthless. The use of a synthetic Perovskite, Bismuth Ferrite, this water Splitting process can generate hydrogen. This process requires an Photoelectrochemical of an infrared to ultraviolet refraction by a solar panel or artificial infrared light.

    • @verderriscursey
      @verderriscursey 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      You dont need a high voltage. You can do this with the car battery

    • @johnussss
      @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Stored energy (batteries) or stored fuel, whether conventional fuel such as petrol or stored hydrogen created during the previously, separating any residual water in the created hydrogen is a problem as it makes the stored hydrogen even more volatile, drying hydrogen created by water/electrolysis is a major cost to commercial creation of fuel hydrogen ... I'm not sure this video is real, looking for other references at the moment.

    • @verderriscursey
      @verderriscursey 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@johnussss u dont store the hydrogen nor need hydrogen stations. U make and use it in demand on the car

    • @johnussss
      @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@verderriscursey I specified it was a difficult thing to do, you didn't read the post I was replying to, nor did you understand my reply!

  • @agostinodibella9939
    @agostinodibella9939 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    If you have a tank filled with water, how would you keep it from freezing in the winter?

    • @nedmilburn
      @nedmilburn 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Antifreeze of a type that wouldn't affect electrolysis, and could afford it as a catalyst...? This is a cool idea but I'm not sure it's real because there's no references given...

    • @constantindespan403
      @constantindespan403 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wasn't Stanley Mayer?

    • @smedleyfarnsworth263
      @smedleyfarnsworth263 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Live somewhere warm perhaps?

    • @BoraHorzaGobuchul
      @BoraHorzaGobuchul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nedmilburnit's very likely those would interfere with hydrogen generation.

    • @BoraHorzaGobuchul
      @BoraHorzaGobuchul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@smedleyfarnsworth263if you check out winter temps across the globe, you might appreciate how ludicrous that suggestion is. Unless you're trolling, of course.

  • @emeliegonzales9318
    @emeliegonzales9318 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “And it runs on water, man!”

  • @markolson2466
    @markolson2466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m reminded of the “technology breakthrough in organic computer” a decade ago. Caught lots of investors with no return! When cracking water molecules is cheaper than gasoline we will be there.

  • @HappyPandaBear73
    @HappyPandaBear73 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating & extremely exciting!👍🙏🙂

  • @haleym16
    @haleym16 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the reason aliens invade earth just to steal water and head out lol

    • @MATTLINNFTW
      @MATTLINNFTW 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • @bobsherman7465
    @bobsherman7465 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I wonder how these cars will work in Michigan where I live. It's starting to get cold and pure water will begin to freeze at or below 32 degrees F. Will these cars run equally well on ice? ROLF 😃

    • @alexmanoj5855
      @alexmanoj5855 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YES IF THE FUEL TANK HAS SAME MATERIAL AND LAYER LIKE A THERMOSTEEL BOTTLE WHICH KEEPS DRINK HOT OR COLD NO MATTER HOW DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE IS IN ITS SURROUNDING

    • @bobsherman7465
      @bobsherman7465 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alexmanoj5855 Very funny. There is always some thermal conductivity across a thermal barrier. So, the fuel (water) will freeze if left long enough. Even if there was a perfect thermal insulator, the lines connecting the container to the outside world would conduct heat, eventually freezing the water.

    • @evangelgreek6864
      @evangelgreek6864 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      - "Antifreeze is a tinted liquid that you put (along with water) in your radiator to help regulate engine temperature. Its key ingredient is ethylene glycol, which lowers water's freezing point and raises its boiling point. This helps prevent the water in your radiator from freezing, boiling, or evaporating."
      - Aviation industry has different ways to prevent icing
      - Swiss engineers work on a similar project based on Sea (salty) Water.
      - Anyway even with mass production the car prices will be absurd !

    • @bobsherman7465
      @bobsherman7465 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@evangelgreek6864 I don't know if you watched the video, but at 7:40 it indicated that the proper fuel for such a car is "purified water." It even mentions distilled water. Salt or antifreeze are contaminants that make the water impure. As the car uses up the water through electrolysis (which separates the hydrogen and oxygen that comprised the water) the remaining water "fuel" becomes increasingly contaminated with the antifreeze or salt. These increasingly concentrated contaminants will slow the electrolysis process and may even damage the electrodes.

  • @arthurlincoln220
    @arthurlincoln220 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Only one slight problem is producing the electrical power to separate the Hydrogen and Oxygen ,it would be a very heavy load on the engine just to run the generator for electrolysis which would also add extra weight to the vehicle.Its the age old dream of perpetual motion which can never exist.

    • @MultimediaTV
      @MultimediaTV 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      See the Colombian system that is working already.

    • @routmaster38
      @routmaster38 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes it takes at least three units of electricity to make only one unit of hydrogen.

    • @galaxion62
      @galaxion62 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      If we use an accelerator to assist with the efficiency of the separation process, subsequent electrolysis current consumption has been seen to be reduced by up to two thirds. These engines are just around the corner, but both petroleum & EV producers are trying to deny & suppress water powered engines with utter desperation!.

    • @mikkolappalainen_
      @mikkolappalainen_ 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Alot of that is said, but then again, you can do electrolysis with a 9V battery worth 2€ and get fair amount of hydrogen in minute. Its not that far fetched that its workable in car. Probably once the engine starts running, it can be generator for loading the battery like in gasoline car

    • @SoggyRice-bc7kl
      @SoggyRice-bc7kl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It can be improved..imagination is better than knowledge

  • @k7iq
    @k7iq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great ! Where can I get one ? But what if it stops raining and I have no more water left ?

  • @savvyz.4155
    @savvyz.4155 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Rip Stanley Myers ❤💯🔒♾️✅

  • @jamesbrownjr4756
    @jamesbrownjr4756 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The "fat cats"......will never allow it. Unless they can charge you accordingly. Nothing will ever be free!

  • @markclemens5066
    @markclemens5066 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm ready for one . Make a v6 Truro for my 2022 Tacoma TDR offroad 4x4. Let's get it done I'll be demo truck .

  • @rockgonzales6870
    @rockgonzales6870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Great technolgy. I hope it will be made in mass production. In the whole world. This technology will great in our environment also in our pocket

  • @josemilian4167
    @josemilian4167 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    anyone have link to company website for toyota that shows "water car?" I can't find any.

  • @DrHarryT
    @DrHarryT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It uses more energy to break the molecular bonds of water into hydrogen and oxygen than you can get out of burning them back together. Entropy slaps you in the face every time.

  • @antoniotorres4840
    @antoniotorres4840 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The main question is where do they are getting the energy to separete the wather molecule? there is the real producer of energy and unles there is some kind of fision (atom destruction) is present water in water out? where the energy come out?

  • @johnussss
    @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    After an extensive search, I find "NOTHING" To back the claims in this video, Toyota have experimented with this idea but never made steps any further than those experiments.

  • @nestorportuguez8964
    @nestorportuguez8964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We had that prototype here in the Philippines several years ago..but the one discovered it had already died..and there is no more successor any more.

  • @frederickcaroca5448
    @frederickcaroca5448 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Water powered cars always come out and the creators always get murdered. I guess this person in the 1% 🤷‍♂️

  • @SH-ONE
    @SH-ONE 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic. A water engine is such a great idea and so much better than the outdated electric vehicles technology.

    • @MATTLINNFTW
      @MATTLINNFTW 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      OMG like i know right like soOoOo 2000 and LATE!

  • @davidvega8024
    @davidvega8024 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we already have a water hydrogen injector to power cars on water. its been around for years! I can`t wait till its in production.

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is this some sort of joke?

  • @dawnezone8491
    @dawnezone8491 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    and if this did eventuate...will it be water for cars and not for humans?

  • @invoker638
    @invoker638 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If its too expensive, we just build one. This is really old technology.

  • @glories2276
    @glories2276 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I will definetley buy one !

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Avoid being scammed.

  • @ronbishop4057
    @ronbishop4057 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The law of conservation of energy says that you cannot get more energy out of a system than inputted. However, there may be caveats. One idea is to use a very high frequency AC current to split the water. The current being in phase or a harmonic of the waters natural resonance, thus increasing the efficiency. Would it work?

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Clearly it doesn't or we would have had already water powered electric power plants instead of coal or even nuclear ones. You have to input more energy into hidrolisis than you will get back from it, it's just basic first law of thermodynamics. At this moment you need 2000g hydrogen to make 1000g of hydrogen.

    • @ronbishop4057
      @ronbishop4057 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zripas You have to ask, why was Stan Meyer murdered if his invention had no merit? I saw a video once, demonstrating the ability to rapidly split gallons of water with an amplifier. Such a method does not violate the laws of physics, it harnesses the ambient energy in the water, reducing the power input needed.

  • @paulosilva8200
    @paulosilva8200 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ha ha now that water is more expensive than petrol makes this doc funny😊

  • @logicman7028
    @logicman7028 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Governments PANIC!! How do we TAX it.

  • @chaymoua5094
    @chaymoua5094 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't wait until see and get one

    • @LouDeVere
      @LouDeVere 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well don't wait in this lifetime! It will come to nothing, trust me.

  • @scotts8684
    @scotts8684 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If this works it can also supply electricity to our homes. We will also need a device where we can distill water in sufficient amounts at home, both for the cars and home.

    • @robertdowner2328
      @robertdowner2328 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The thing about stuff like this that they clame will be a free fuel source government fingers will be in it finding a way to charge people, they would charge you a water bill higher rates, and mak people pay per gallon just like they did gas. it is a genius invention but they dont seem to understand they have to bypass corporate greed and the government.

  • @markwight2861
    @markwight2861 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    My dad said he knew a guy who made his car run on water in the 50's

    • @dragonballz2889
      @dragonballz2889 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      stanley meyer

    • @JamesWillis-yy5px
      @JamesWillis-yy5px 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep it's not that hard. The problem is the martials to do so, are super rare. Platinum. Making these cars, impossible to mass produce.

    • @johnussss
      @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Knew a guy who made a f250 truck partially fueled by hydrogen in the 80's, thing had 3 alternators.

  • @dubsydubs5234
    @dubsydubs5234 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where does it get the electricity to crack the water?

  • @alastairmacdowell9905
    @alastairmacdowell9905 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hard to know where to start with the errors and mis information.

  • @jerwinbuenconsejo7091
    @jerwinbuenconsejo7091 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Filipino inventor mr.dingle made first water engine introduce in Philippines government but they disregard it.

  • @jmeadowcroft6704
    @jmeadowcroft6704 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The announcer said the car gives off H twenty… Is that like H2O? Water? H twenty…

  • @armandolagunday3543
    @armandolagunday3543 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's the greatest invention ever

  • @daveedson8607
    @daveedson8607 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electric cars have high maintenance costs? You must live in a different universe than I do. My total maintenance costs for 2 year and 25K miles is zero.

  • @myname5068
    @myname5068 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How to power the electrolysis from charged battery? How to charge it and it destroy what it produce if the motor will do this maybe it's possible but not efficient no way this is going to happen technically or something missing from what have said

  • @MichaelKrick-tu8jk
    @MichaelKrick-tu8jk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much is stock selling for?

  • @yinyang9109
    @yinyang9109 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah, I believe it when it on my drive way.

  • @lucusrose
    @lucusrose 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How different is an LNG engine?

  • @o-dreng8778
    @o-dreng8778 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A sniper 2 miles away : 🤨

  • @MILITANTMONEY
    @MILITANTMONEY 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    my whole house would run off my car

  • @twiserchaki6029
    @twiserchaki6029 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So human will compete with Cars for water😂😂

  • @DudoDria
    @DudoDria 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If we "burn" H2O in time we must make H20 !! How !?

  • @jmc3367
    @jmc3367 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sooo......water engine is the term for marketing......it's hydrogen combustion.

  • @happycows
    @happycows 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Cars that run on water are not a new invention. 😂

    • @fly9wheel
      @fly9wheel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or a new fairy story !

  • @themestocleslasay-zm4kn
    @themestocleslasay-zm4kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope soon the water vihicle is available in the toyota market anywhere in this world to save the earth.

  • @davidraines368
    @davidraines368 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We are having water shortages and water cars will drink a lot of water. What is left when the Hydrogen or H2 is removed from Water or H2O

    • @carlthompson2385
      @carlthompson2385 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Strange as it may seem... the byproducts is emissions in the form of water vapor... and that goes right back into the atmosphere... forming clouds.. then it rains..filling reservoirs...with water..

  • @chrisreynolds6152
    @chrisreynolds6152 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If this happens, water prices are going to skyrocket. Body odor will be rampant. People will have to decide whether they want to wash their nuts, or drive to work.

  • @rathmam
    @rathmam 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is the hydrogen tank safe in the accidents?

    • @servanttoson
      @servanttoson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My thoughts precisely

    • @johnussss
      @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No hydrogen tank, go back and watch, hydrogen is created and used, the water is stored, according to this there are no pressure vessels.

  • @dogdooish
    @dogdooish 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I feel that it will have a method of using VERY high voltages, so maybe it'll need a good sized battery as well!

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So basically its a BEV which wastes energy on Hydrogen conversion?

  • @ViceCoin
    @ViceCoin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    US will beccome land of classic gasoline vehicles, with no auto manufacturers.

  • @tonyneil3944
    @tonyneil3944 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    oh it's a great idea but it's never going to destroy the car industry

  • @qabute
    @qabute 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't ever say "will destroy the car industry" and "recently discovered". Tsk!

  • @williamgary7891
    @williamgary7891 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The train 🚂 was the first water engine 🚂

    • @engineeringtheweirdguy2103
      @engineeringtheweirdguy2103 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They’re actually coal engines. Water is just the working fluid. Not the energy source. That would be like calling an excavator a hydraulic engine.

  • @Didda3
    @Didda3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Didn't the guy get killed after he invented a water powered engine many moons ago?

  • @johnburfield6818
    @johnburfield6818 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really hope the government allow production

    • @Johnny-um6sd
      @Johnny-um6sd 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You must be dreaming) oil companies will bribe our leaders ) an they have 100' s of billions) this technology will not see the light of day till 500 yrs from now)

  • @user-zc6ur8eq9g
    @user-zc6ur8eq9g 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When is this hydrogen combustion engine car being launched for the public in the market. Has Toyota given any time frame.

  • @richardmoore-ph7cp
    @richardmoore-ph7cp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about operating cold climates.

  • @edodukic7545
    @edodukic7545 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It runs on water man!

  • @user-hf8wd2cn7h
    @user-hf8wd2cn7h 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And also make me a big Truck 🚚 that runs with water 💧 😊

  • @tanchenghuat2056
    @tanchenghuat2056 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you have Toyota do not worry they being silent like others.

  • @tonac13
    @tonac13 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Not if the Car Industry destroys the developer first 🤷‍♂🤔

    • @maxwolf2726
      @maxwolf2726 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's not so much the car industry is more like the petroleum industry

    • @neilacrabtree1617
      @neilacrabtree1617 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right. Each time someone figures it out they die. It will never happen. No one wants to have this happen

  • @noleftturns
    @noleftturns 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Water (H2O) is a greenhouse gas that dwarfs CO2.

    • @johnussss
      @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What?

    • @jabeztadesse
      @jabeztadesse 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ???

  • @MonsterBatinator
    @MonsterBatinator 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An Australian man was the first to make an engin run souly on water, way before Myres, it wasn't for a car though...his invention was shelved and he was paid to keep his mouth shut...

    • @SogoTX
      @SogoTX 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now in the current era... they just KILL you... allegedly... ;)

  • @rebeccalee7186
    @rebeccalee7186 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hell water will become $5 a gallon

  • @nestorportuguez8964
    @nestorportuguez8964 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is what we are waiting for...when this should be produce? was this true?

  • @datmeme8967
    @datmeme8967 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine thinking it somehow takes less energy to turn water into hydrogen than the energy the hydrogen will make when you burn it.

  • @puddnjones9816
    @puddnjones9816 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If this ever did hit the market I would be interested getting one even though I normally despise Toyota.

    • @MaxAtLarge
      @MaxAtLarge 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I love Toyota and I hope this becomes a reality very soon!

    • @dufung3980
      @dufung3980 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No reason to despise toyota imho, they produce the lowest overall emission car in the world, the Prius. From mining to manufacturing to decommsioning, it's the least pollutive, even it's production factory is 50% solar.

  • @constantindespan403
    @constantindespan403 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wasn't Stanley Mayer?

  • @thomaswiker3471
    @thomaswiker3471 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the 70s the French government put a challenge to Auto maker's and Renault won that with a vehicle that got over a 100 mpg in overall rate not highway if you want to see a book by Hector Mackenzie-Wintle in Sutton's photographic history of transport

  • @odie9323
    @odie9323 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isn't hydrogen like helium and make your car float

    • @johnussss
      @johnussss 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no!

  • @justinharvey5696
    @justinharvey5696 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well now we know who did it

  • @colincrisp1592
    @colincrisp1592 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's been here for E.ver

  • @rlrothr
    @rlrothr 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Let’s hear about electrolysis?

  • @FrankLowe1949
    @FrankLowe1949 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ice roads or winter.😢

  • @b.bgyawali
    @b.bgyawali 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Water freezing point is 0 degrees Celsius. so i doubt will it be feasible for cold countries because in winters there temperatures hit less than -5 degree Celsius.

  • @vixenstar1
    @vixenstar1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They already unalived the man who invited this

  • @pressurizer1
    @pressurizer1 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Prototypes and schematics that can be critiqued and reviewed by anybody.

  • @urbanspaceman7183
    @urbanspaceman7183 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The car industry has NEVER been the number one polluter.

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And?

    • @urbanspaceman7183
      @urbanspaceman7183 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zripas And, he claims different. Try listening.

  • @richardhamilton8087
    @richardhamilton8087 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great News

  • @chitaegandalalake263
    @chitaegandalalake263 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ,,, naaa, here in my country we replace gasoline with tap water running the old engine.
    , we just put a "hydrogenator-device" with the carburetor.
    , it's a very old technology actually.

  • @MarkAllen-no4qv
    @MarkAllen-no4qv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Learned this in 9th grade chemistry class in the early 70s.

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      First law of thermodynamics?

    • @MarkAllen-no4qv
      @MarkAllen-no4qv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zripas Obviously the first law of thermodynamics is incorrect.. Water does split into hydrogen and oxygen which do burn. So there is obviously a relationship between mass and energy...

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MarkAllen-no4qv
      And that split requires what? Energy? Right? So you put in energy to split hydrogen and then use hydrogen to generate energy? Cool, sounds simple. What isn't simple is that you need 2000g of hydrogen to generate 1000g of hydrogen, yes, those numbers are not backwards. Do you see tiny issue relating to first law of thermodynamics?

    • @MarkAllen-no4qv
      @MarkAllen-no4qv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ZripasRegardless, the engine runs itself on water, proving my point.. Newtonian physics are obsolete in many respects. I do agree with the 2nd law seeing we live in a closed system...

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MarkAllen-no4qv
      Engine doesn't run on water.. Engine runs on hydrogen. You can have additional battery which could generate some amount of hydrogen from water, but it will run out quicker than it would if you simply used that same battery to run electric motor.
      Cars do not run on water, those run on hydrogen, and first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow for water engines to be reality.

  • @fly9wheel
    @fly9wheel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If it sounds too good to be true it usually is.

  • @boonraypipatchol7295
    @boonraypipatchol7295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They need breaking wind to mix with.

  • @user-hf8wd2cn7h
    @user-hf8wd2cn7h 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I want one 😊

  • @aaronsmith593
    @aaronsmith593 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's called hydrogen and oxygen that you can process out of water. An hydrogen engine can burn the hydrogen and oxygen from water catalyst or called a fuel cell.

  • @jliengkul
    @jliengkul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much water you have to carry with you to go 300-500 miles.

    • @Zripas
      @Zripas 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      None, because it doesn't work.

  • @johnadan3509
    @johnadan3509 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t know in Japan but in US Water is more expensive than gas 😁

  • @markrowland1366
    @markrowland1366 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    85% methane is available in Brazil and Australia. 10% is 84 Octane and cheaper.