@user-even-duller-brain because, it's common for people to confuse anything that "Launches a projectile with electromagnetisim" for a "railgun." I think "railgun" is a more popular word because of its military connotations. And the word somehow subjectively sounds "tougher" than "coilgun." Obviously, in a railgun, the projectile actually shorts current between the rail, and Lorentz forces and the incredibly violent arc propel the projectile. Where a coilgun is essentially a toroidal electromagnet, forming a solenoid with a free moving core, and ideally, current ceases before the coil tries to pull the solenoid-core/projectile back in. It is a lot like how the Doom video game created generations of people thinking that an electrically driven multi-barrel rotary machinegun, a "Gatling" is called a "Chain Gun." Perhaps because they think the barrels fire sequentially in a chain. When an actual "Chain Gun" is something like the Bushmaster line of medium caliber (somewhere around 20-30mm) automatic cannons, like found on the US Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle or the chin turret of an AH-64 Apache helicopter. And the Bushmaster is called a Chain Gun because the bolt & feed mechanism is literally formed & connected and driven like a few enormous links of a bicycle or motorcycle drive-chain. And "Chain Gun" just tries to become a more universal term, because it sounds "tough." Maybe like "beating on something with a heavy chain." 🤔
@@tempjadhoif the fuse burns before the coil is sufficiently charged it won't impart as much energy as it might have. A bigger fuse will take longer to burn so it will transfer more to the projectile. If the fuse burns too slow however, it will do the exact opposite and want to hold the bearing in the center of the coil and not slingshot it out.
at 1:43 till 1:44 if u play the video using" , " key and "." key you can see the coil get tighter right when the spark happens and at 2:10 to 2:11 the coil guns moves back like it has recoil
It's a fascinating topic to discuss, because so mamy mechanical & physics principles are involved. Rifling a coilgun would have a good chance to get the projectile stuck in the bore, at least not without an enormous amount of force. And one coil alone is inefficient, and cannot usually accelerate the projectile much faster on its own, no matter how big or powerful its made. One has to stage a sequence of coils, each one providing acceleration in perfect sequence & timing faster and faster, usually with digital electronics & LED's making "light gates" with a photo-sensor of some sort. In an actual gunpowder firearm, and the relatively soft copper & lead of the bullet actually press-fits itself into the rifling grooves. There are obviously .177 bb's that are steel, and those airguns are rifled, but it mainly works because the bb is so tiny and light. A bigger projectile from a coilgun wouldn't pick up much, if any spin that way. And the bore contact needed only slows the projectile down through friction, unlike an airgun or firearm, where that friction also provides a seal, and gets more work out of the expanding gas, which overcomes the friction in a useful trade-off. Fins and aerodynamic drag stabilization is a better idea, but still complicated. There's certainly a ton of 12 & 20ga non-spinning shotgun hunting slugs that work on the principle. However, with a coilgun, there's some limitations. You need ferrous metals for the projectile, or at least a significant amount, so the magnetic forces in the coil will make it will move. This means you need a longer projectile than a lead one to get the desired mass. And the longer rod-like projectile is better at being moved by the magnetic force in the coil too. The problem is getting useful fins on a projectile that cannot be wider than its body in the bore. Fins that taper within the diameter of the body can work, sort of like the elongated tip of a Phillips screwdriver, but unlike visibly protruding fins like a more traditional arrow or ricket shape, they do so poorly. Backwards flip-out "knife fins" like the tail of a little mini RPG grenade would work, but be insanely complex to make. It's possible to configure the coils and projectile to impart spin through magnetic forces along with the main driving force pulling the projectile forwards, but that's very difficult & complex too.
Make this with a ten metre diameter hole and the length of the coil in a circle with a diameter of at least 100km. A payload 'packet' could be accelerated around and around, sufficient number of times, until the packet payload had orbital velocity... It would be a very cheap, effective, efficient - method of launching things from Earth into Space. The circle of coils of wire built below ground with a divert tube at 45 degrees (use a mountain) to get more elevation. I have been describing this for decades but no one seems to be interested in the ability to launch many tonnes into orbit for just the cost of a little electric current!
"A little" electric current which would be enough to power entire cities for a single launch doesn't seem very cost effective, even less so given the insane infrastructure needed to properly have it launched. You're pretty much describing an open-ended mass accelerator. Not particle accelerator, mind you, but MASS accelerator. Go take a peek at what the LHC cost and multiply that hundredfold, at least. It's just not viable, and this idea has been pitched before to no avail due to energy and budget constraints. Engineering is the art of adjusting to constraints and making the most of what's available. And that includes costs of all types, be it energetic or monetary.
@@MRNDESO-ps7bz ⚠️ God has said in the Quran: 🔵 { O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous - ( 2:21 ) 🔴 [He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him]. ( 2:22 ) 🔵 And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. ( 2:23 ) 🔴 But if you do not - and you will never be able to - then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.( 2:24 ) 🔵 And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, "This is what we were provided with before." And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally. ( 2:25 ) ⚠️ Quran
@@r5a773 Основная средняя школа Класс естествознания Образование: Земная гравитация хорошо! Если ракета запускается с поверхности Земли, ей необходимо достичь скорости не менее 7,9 километров в секунду (4,9 миль в секунду), чтобы достичь космоса. Эта скорость 7,9 километров в секунду известна как орбитальная скорость. Для запуска с достижением земной гравитации Ну, иначе говоря, скорость убегания составляет 11,8 км/с... «Скорость убегания» - это баллистическое требование, поэтому, если вы стреляете пулей с поверхности Земли, по крайней мере, если она не летит от Земли Со скоростью 11,8 км/с он будет постоянно замедляться под действием земной гравитации (почти постоянное отрицательное ускорение) и никогда не покинет земную гравитацию.
Hmmm... besides providing a useful current cutoff that stops the coil from trying to pull the projectile back in, I wonder if the explosive foil fuse... it provides a fast rise-time spike in voltage/current as well, that makes the coil more efficient? 🤔
Edit: nvm this comment is wrong Original comment: You should not wind your coil backwards, it decreases your strength. When starting a new layer, wind to the start once, and start winding forward again. When you wind backwards, it cancels out, making it the strength of only 1 layer with increased resistance.
единственно верное решение поставить в центре тот самый контролёр! который будет говорить объекту , тут середина. все довольно просто, катушка в виде песочных часов.
The fuse is there to quickly kill the electromagnet. When the projectectile is "behind" the coil and the magnet is activated, it's being accelerated in the correct direction - down the barrel. However, if the magnet were left on the whole time, as the projectile passed the center of the coil, it would start to be pulled backwards and ultimately stopped in the barrel rather than flying out and striking the target. You can see them demonstrate this at the beginning of the video. Switching is one of the issues with coilguns. Theoretically, they have some big advantages over railguns. In practice, however, the challenge of being able to quickly and precisely power up/down the sections of a multi-stage coilgun is a major headache that's limited their speed thus far.
I like the aluminum foil fuse, however, a "spark gap" switch/or fuse may allow for even more power, and briefer circuit connect time (I'm sure there is a more accurate phrase for this).
@@quellenathanar and the reason behind using dc is? I'm trying to make a working model on it , basically a small and safe railgun model for school , but I'm pretty confused with currents , I don't want to destroy my school's circuit 🙂
Like to ask questions, magnetic Games How many turns of coul on how many diameter (mm) of iiron core (Hole) Voltage applied? If you can also, it draws up to how many amp? What's the length of the coil core with layers? Many thanks From Nigeria New in electronics
Some time ago I was trying to make something like this, but I wanted to use Arduino-controlled relays. Alas, I was unable to suppress the back current (tried various diodes, no avail), it was baking the relays as they start opening open.
They don't discharge instantly, and you should always use resistors. The fuse blows before they discharge. If it didn't, the bearing would sit in the center of the coil and go no where.
The capacitors are connected in series, which means the voltage is twice that stated on the capacitor body. In the video he uses two 63v capacitor, 63v + 63v = 126v maks. more voltage = more power.
@@tioagustian71 in this case, yes, it is more power, but more voltage just means the power is released faster. if you have one capacitor and another with the same capacity but at a higher voltage, it's the same amount of power, it's just released faster
Bello e molto ben fatto, l'unica cosa che migliorerei è l'ancoraggio dell'avvolgimento, si vede chiaramente che l'avvolgimento indietreggia e questo fa diminuire, anche se di poco, la velocità del proiettile. Si potrebbe migliorare ancora cercando il punto "perfetto" dove posizionare il proiettile, facendo varie prove anche variando il "fusibile" così da trovare il miglio compromesso 🙂 Bel lavoro!
Grazie. Ti assicuro che per trovare questa configurazione ho dovuto fa molti test sia sulla posizione del proiettile che sulle dimensioni del fusibile. Non dico di aver trovato la configurazione perfetta ma di test ne ho fatti un centinaio. Minime variazioni producono grandi differenze nel risultato.
Railguns are more efficient, they use repelling force instead of attracting force, which allows them to use all of the coil's power instead of just half.
I calculated, and the whole setup used 99 joules of electricity per fire. The maximum kinetic energy of the bullet was only 0.5 joules, yielding an energy conversion efficiency of an embarrassing 0.5%.
Instead of wrapping the coil wire back and forth, try a single coil, then wrap a completely different coil on top, then a third, ect. Run the coils in parallel. This will increase the acceleration as the current will flow through all coils simultaneously and in only one direction. With the demonstrated setup, the magnetic field travels forward, but then backwards, acting as a damper. Additionally, coils in parallel reduce the overal resistance, allowing more current to flow. More current means stronger magnetic field.
@MagneticGamesIT you can also overlaping the individual coils but will need a more complex timing sequence for initialization. This would require separate capacitor banks for each coil as well.
Not trying to sound some type of way but you very obviously misunderstand the right hand rule and how to wrap a coil. Also, if you're referring to flyback in the coil, that's still a magnetic field and will still attract the bearing, it's not a magnet he's shooting.
@LittleXtra I am aware of tge right hand rule, and I do understand that the direction of force generated by the magnetic field is perpendicular to the direction of electron flow. I understand that winding the coil back and forth does generate force in one direction. However, the flow of current is not instantaneous throughout the entire length of the coil. At initial energization, the electrons start flowing at one end and the magnetic field propagated accordingly. The magnetic field moves up and down the coil when it is wrapped back and forth. The direction of force will be in the same direction, but some of the generated force will be wasted as the projectile moves in one direction and the propagation of the magnetic field moves in the opposite direction. Think of it like blowing compressed air into a tube with a ping pong ball in it.The ball starts close to you air nozzle, you turn on the air and as the ball starts moving, you move the air nozzle down the tube right behind the ball, then you bring the nozzle back to it's starting position while the air is still flowing. The force generated by the air was always in one direction, but on the return path, the distance between the source of force and the projectile grows. This reduces the amount of force applied to the projectile.
Amazing very amazing and dangerous experiment... But you achieve all the goals successfully...Congratulations 🎉 Best of luck ❤
The aluminum foil fuse is a pretty clever solution to avoid expensive and complicated semiconductor setup
99.99% of people using MOSFET, 555, raspberry, lrdm transistor, etc. Then this guy : 1$ cooking foil
Lol lol lol lol
never seen a coilgun* (wops) that uses a fuse to interrupt te currwent. it's beautiful.
Coil gun, rail gun works is diferent.
Thats a coil gun, not a rail gun
bruh, it literally says in the video title "powerful COILGUN"
Sir when you said railgun i now got confused...can i ask why you said railgun?
@user-even-duller-brain because, it's common for people to confuse anything that "Launches a projectile with electromagnetisim" for a "railgun."
I think "railgun" is a more popular word because of its military connotations. And the word somehow subjectively sounds "tougher" than "coilgun."
Obviously, in a railgun, the projectile actually shorts current between the rail, and Lorentz forces and the incredibly violent arc propel the projectile. Where a coilgun is essentially a toroidal electromagnet, forming a solenoid with a free moving core, and ideally, current ceases before the coil tries to pull the solenoid-core/projectile back in.
It is a lot like how the Doom video game created generations of people thinking that an electrically driven multi-barrel rotary machinegun, a "Gatling" is called a "Chain Gun." Perhaps because they think the barrels fire sequentially in a chain.
When an actual "Chain Gun" is something like the Bushmaster line of medium caliber (somewhere around 20-30mm) automatic cannons, like found on the US Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle or the chin turret of an AH-64 Apache helicopter.
And the Bushmaster is called a Chain Gun because the bolt & feed mechanism is literally formed & connected and driven like a few enormous links of a bicycle or motorcycle drive-chain.
And "Chain Gun" just tries to become a more universal term, because it sounds "tough." Maybe like "beating on something with a heavy chain." 🤔
The title of this video should be:
How to build a futuristic home defense platform on a shoestring budget.
I dunno, those caps look expensive
Excellent build and slo-mo camera work! Satisfactory marksmanship. 😉🤣✌️😎
love the foil fuse
I would've liked seeing you vary the thickness of the sacrificial aluminum strip. Could've optimized energy transfer to the projectile that way.
Why don't you do it?
@@RickGrimes807 because I don't have a bank of supercapacitors and powersupply to do this
Hi would you like to explain how you could do that.
@@tempjadhoif the fuse burns before the coil is sufficiently charged it won't impart as much energy as it might have. A bigger fuse will take longer to burn so it will transfer more to the projectile. If the fuse burns too slow however, it will do the exact opposite and want to hold the bearing in the center of the coil and not slingshot it out.
Many thanks for your efforts sharing this.
at 1:43 till 1:44 if u play the video using" , " key and "." key you can see the coil get tighter right when the spark happens
and at 2:10 to 2:11 the coil guns moves back like it has recoil
New idea: Magnetic artillery
Adding some rifling in the bore and fins for the projectile would up the game 😌
It's a fascinating topic to discuss, because so mamy mechanical & physics principles are involved.
Rifling a coilgun would have a good chance to get the projectile stuck in the bore, at least not without an enormous amount of force. And one coil alone is inefficient, and cannot usually accelerate the projectile much faster on its own, no matter how big or powerful its made. One has to stage a sequence of coils, each one providing acceleration in perfect sequence & timing faster and faster, usually with digital electronics & LED's making "light gates" with a photo-sensor of some sort.
In an actual gunpowder firearm, and the relatively soft copper & lead of the bullet actually press-fits itself into the rifling grooves. There are obviously .177 bb's that are steel, and those airguns are rifled, but it mainly works because the bb is so tiny and light. A bigger projectile from a coilgun wouldn't pick up much, if any spin that way. And the bore contact needed only slows the projectile down through friction, unlike an airgun or firearm, where that friction also provides a seal, and gets more work out of the expanding gas, which overcomes the friction in a useful trade-off.
Fins and aerodynamic drag stabilization is a better idea, but still complicated. There's certainly a ton of 12 & 20ga non-spinning shotgun hunting slugs that work on the principle.
However, with a coilgun, there's some limitations. You need ferrous metals for the projectile, or at least a significant amount, so the magnetic forces in the coil will make it will move.
This means you need a longer projectile than a lead one to get the desired mass. And the longer rod-like projectile is better at being moved by the magnetic force in the coil too.
The problem is getting useful fins on a projectile that cannot be wider than its body in the bore. Fins that taper within the diameter of the body can work, sort of like the elongated tip of a Phillips screwdriver, but unlike visibly protruding fins like a more traditional arrow or ricket shape, they do so poorly.
Backwards flip-out "knife fins" like the tail of a little mini RPG grenade would work, but be insanely complex to make.
It's possible to configure the coils and projectile to impart spin through magnetic forces along with the main driving force pulling the projectile forwards, but that's very difficult & complex too.
What an amazing comment and set of insights!
how to murder someone with magnets
very nice video, i was not expecting that the coilgun will really working, but it is really working 👍😀👍👌😂
pourquoi avoir fait le choix de mettre les condensateurs en série, ne délivrent t-ils pas plus de courant en étant en parallèle ?
Merci pour la vidéo
high voltage is needed to reduce the resistance
at 0:36… how can be current passing trough the wire of there’s not any power source?
This one aint a toy but a real weapon
35mph 8mm steel ball might bruise a squirrel. That’s about it
@@ZombieSlayerBO2bro not everyone's skin is made of tungsten
May I know the list of materials that you used? Thank you!
Make this with a ten metre diameter hole and the length of the coil in a circle with a diameter of at least 100km.
A payload 'packet' could be accelerated around and around, sufficient number of times, until the packet payload had orbital velocity...
It would be a very cheap, effective, efficient - method of launching things from Earth into Space.
The circle of coils of wire built below ground with a divert tube at 45 degrees (use a mountain) to get more elevation.
I have been describing this for decades but no one seems to be interested in the ability to launch many tonnes into orbit for just the cost of a little electric current!
😂😂😂👍👍👍👍
"A little" electric current which would be enough to power entire cities for a single launch doesn't seem very cost effective, even less so given the insane infrastructure needed to properly have it launched. You're pretty much describing an open-ended mass accelerator. Not particle accelerator, mind you, but MASS accelerator. Go take a peek at what the LHC cost and multiply that hundredfold, at least. It's just not viable, and this idea has been pitched before to no avail due to energy and budget constraints.
Engineering is the art of adjusting to constraints and making the most of what's available. And that includes costs of all types, be it energetic or monetary.
@@MRNDESO-ps7bz ⚠️ God has said in the Quran:
🔵 { O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous - ( 2:21 )
🔴 [He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him]. ( 2:22 )
🔵 And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful. ( 2:23 )
🔴 But if you do not - and you will never be able to - then fear the Fire, whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the disbelievers.( 2:24 )
🔵 And give good tidings to those who believe and do righteous deeds that they will have gardens [in Paradise] beneath which rivers flow. Whenever they are provided with a provision of fruit therefrom, they will say, "This is what we were provided with before." And it is given to them in likeness. And they will have therein purified spouses, and they will abide therein eternally. ( 2:25 )
⚠️ Quran
А в космосе ты как ловить будешь???
@@r5a773
Основная средняя школа Класс естествознания Образование:
Земная гравитация хорошо!
Если ракета запускается с поверхности Земли, ей необходимо достичь скорости не менее 7,9 километров в секунду (4,9 миль в секунду), чтобы достичь космоса. Эта скорость 7,9 километров в секунду известна как орбитальная скорость.
Для запуска с достижением земной гравитации Ну, иначе говоря, скорость убегания составляет 11,8 км/с... «Скорость убегания» - это баллистическое требование, поэтому, если вы стреляете пулей с поверхности Земли, по крайней мере, если она не летит от Земли Со скоростью 11,8 км/с он будет постоянно замедляться под действием земной гравитации (почти постоянное отрицательное ускорение) и никогда не покинет земную гравитацию.
Hmmm... besides providing a useful current cutoff that stops the coil from trying to pull the projectile back in, I wonder if the explosive foil fuse... it provides a fast rise-time spike in voltage/current as well, that makes the coil more efficient? 🤔
Can you please give the exact measurements ???
How many times we can use the gun, after charging the capacitors once?
I had to recharge the capacitors every time to always have the same behavior and current.
Edit: nvm this comment is wrong
Original comment:
You should not wind your coil backwards, it decreases your strength. When starting a new layer, wind to the start once, and start winding forward again. When you wind backwards, it cancels out, making it the strength of only 1 layer with increased resistance.
It doesn't the magnetic field still points in the same direction, do the right hand rule
@@burhan8795 o
Welp ig I wasted so much time and effort winding coils like that ima change all my electromagnets now
NO
@@bitonic589i think its called solenoid right hand rule
@@elfyviera4035 yeah I thought the coil direction changing polarity also applied to the layers in the electromagnet
What is the material of the plate you have used 0:38
コイルガンって設計することが意外と難しいんですよ
大きいコンデンサ（青い円筒形のやつ）と、コンデンサ容量と弾体の大きさに見合った適切な大きさのコイル、大電流を少ないロスでオンオフできるスイッチング素子などを用意して、それらを完璧に発動させることがとてつもなく難しい。
さらに引き込み型コイルガンの場合、弾体を発射するときにコイルに電流が流れっぱなしだとブレーキになって初速が爆下がりするから弾体がコイルの中央を通過するまでにどうにかして電源を遮断しないといけない。この人はそれをアルミホイルでやってるのが素晴らしいアイデア。
この装置すごいですよ。作ろうとして諦めたことある僕がいうから間違いない。
Thanks ... To find the right configuration I made about a hundred attempts
единственно верное решение поставить в центре тот самый контролёр! который будет говорить объекту , тут середина.
все довольно просто, катушка в виде песочных часов.
Does the fuse have to burn to generate energy?
The fuse is there to quickly kill the electromagnet. When the projectectile is "behind" the coil and the magnet is activated, it's being accelerated in the correct direction - down the barrel. However, if the magnet were left on the whole time, as the projectile passed the center of the coil, it would start to be pulled backwards and ultimately stopped in the barrel rather than flying out and striking the target. You can see them demonstrate this at the beginning of the video.
Switching is one of the issues with coilguns. Theoretically, they have some big advantages over railguns. In practice, however, the challenge of being able to quickly and precisely power up/down the sections of a multi-stage coilgun is a major headache that's limited their speed thus far.
@@Eviel1n Thank you vary much. 🙏🌹❤️
Have you tried it with higher voltage capacitor instead?
I like the aluminum foil fuse, however, a "spark gap" switch/or fuse may allow for even more power, and briefer circuit connect time (I'm sure there is a more accurate phrase for this).
Spark Gap is the correct term.
@@TheLurker-XYZ Thanks.
Can you tell me please that the used electricity in circuit is AC current or DC current...?
@@uttu_tri I'm gonna have to say DC.
@@quellenathanar and the reason behind using dc is? I'm trying to make a working model on it , basically a small and safe railgun model for school , but I'm pretty confused with currents , I don't want to destroy my school's circuit 🙂
Like to ask questions, magnetic Games
How many turns of coul on how many diameter (mm) of iiron core (Hole)
Voltage applied?
If you can also, it draws up to how many amp?
What's the length of the coil core with layers?
Many thanks
From Nigeria
New in electronics
I used 1kg of copper wire 1.5 mm
Increíble como se vaporiza el aluminio 😮
You are smart 🤯🤯🤯
This idea was literally amazing ! i will try it out too
Very cool project!👍👍
Can you tell me where you got these tools? I want to try this experiment.
Please reply to my question
You can also use the magnetic field from big coil to brake the circuit.
Time to get a cyber truck. Mount a large one of these and I've got myself a gauss hog 👊😎
why Cs in series and not in parallel?
Amazing very amazing . ongratulations 🎉 Best of luck ❤
とにかく穴をあけたい時に便利ですね👍
Me encanta 👍👍👍👍👍
Can It Throw Projectiles As Small As 3mm Nails?
Sure
Some time ago I was trying to make something like this, but I wanted to use Arduino-controlled relays. Alas, I was unable to suppress the back current (tried various diodes, no avail), it was baking the relays as they start opening open.
Use a high current, low voltage MOSFET.
Genial ❤❤❤
Thanks bro ❤❤❤
Why not try using relay high amp
lmao. my guy made a deadly weapon, not knowing it's a deadly weapon
Are the foils acting as fuse?
con este invento podré lanzar un Nokia 3310 al espacio y destruir con el planetas.
capacitors discharge instantly, why need a fuse?
They don't discharge instantly, and you should always use resistors. The fuse blows before they discharge. If it didn't, the bearing would sit in the center of the coil and go no where.
Could someone explain why are the two capacitors needed?
do you know why capacitors exist?
it's so a lot of power can be released at once
The capacitors are connected in series, which means the voltage is twice that stated on the capacitor body. In the video he uses two 63v capacitor, 63v + 63v = 126v maks. more voltage = more power.
@@tioagustian71 in this case, yes, it is more power, but more voltage just means the power is released faster. if you have one capacitor and another with the same capacity but at a higher voltage, it's the same amount of power, it's just released faster
Cool 😃
Can you do the same with a spark gap?
Instead of cans experiment with meat, also it would be interesting to see different sizes of coils and its force
amazing💖👍
❤❤ Do PLEASE 🙏🥺 BUILD A GENERATOR WITH A Similar setup. To power a drill n lights😊😊😊😊
Hii sir I can automate this using embedded technology
10 milionów subskrypcji i lajków
how much watt it consumes for 1 hit
can
Hey ! What camera are you using to get such slow motion?
A Sony rx 100
فكره حلوه ❤
Linear synchronous motor
This is my graduation project in several stages
Increase volts, amps and sharpness of bullets
It will become more lethal
There was a good missed chance to shout "LORENTZ FORCE, GO!" while pulling the lever 😔😔😔
Простенькая электромагнитная Гаусс пушка😁
The author of the video, how many joules does the projectile of this cannon have? Thank you in advance
Wow.. Brilliant 🎉
i bet the coil is the limiting factor, the 1f cap can dish out 3,600A , the wire on the coil is thin and probably can't carry 10amps,
But over that really short time the energy lost to heat would be pretty low
@shlushe1050 and what does that have to do with what i said? sounds like you're answering someone else's comment about heat loss 😂
Nice.
Bring it to Fallout 4 mods 👍
Nice project, where did you buy your copper wire and what gauge was it?
brother why you want to know 💀
Is that some kind of capacitor to the right of the switch? Edit no it seems more like a fuse.
What is it?
the aluminium foil acts as a fuse, the blue ones are the capacitors
Таак, ну это только гладкоствольное. А какая мощность нарезного такого "ружья"?...
with a 30lb bow i can do more damage to a sheet of foam at 30m. But as an experiment - very interesting, good work
I can use a gun at 100m, what exactly is your point? 🤣
WOW! Awesome 👍 One of these days you'll get snatched off the street by the men in black 😆
Ртуть жидкая+киноварь порошек+золото+ медь+ магнит и разряд от зажигалки пьезовой.
Fire in the hole 🗣️🔥🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🔥🗣️🔥🔥
Thanks
Now I can take a bank
لو سمحت اشرح كيفية تركيب التجربة بالتفصيل
Great! 😡 Now the TSA is not going to let me bring magnets on the airplane! 😅😅
Nice
You should use a water melon with the linear accelerator mass
Mis respetos
так теперь это оружие? магнитно электронное? электромагнитное?
nice!
Now find a way to compact it all together into a gun
Due to the unstable structure of the electric coil as a cannon, a lot of energy is lost.
Bello e molto ben fatto, l'unica cosa che migliorerei è l'ancoraggio dell'avvolgimento, si vede chiaramente che l'avvolgimento indietreggia e questo fa diminuire, anche se di poco, la velocità del proiettile. Si potrebbe migliorare ancora cercando il punto "perfetto" dove posizionare il proiettile, facendo varie prove anche variando il "fusibile" così da trovare il miglio compromesso 🙂
Bel lavoro!
Grazie. Ti assicuro che per trovare questa configurazione ho dovuto fa molti test sia sulla posizione del proiettile che sulle dimensioni del fusibile. Non dico di aver trovato la configurazione perfetta ma di test ne ho fatti un centinaio. Minime variazioni producono grandi differenze nel risultato.
brilliant job
You got to tie the launcher down. Youre losing power on the kick back? 1000 fps is insane.
Amazing
This could be the gun used in the future but more compact
where gun fire now silenced (which cause mass shooting harder to notice)
Railguns are more efficient, they use repelling force instead of attracting force, which allows them to use all of the coil's power instead of just half.
Fiko sto video.
👌👍
Don’t show this to da opps 🤫🤫🤫
Сделать многоступенчатый, тогда будет вообще оружие!
I calculated, and the whole setup used 99 joules of electricity per fire. The maximum kinetic energy of the bullet was only 0.5 joules, yielding an energy conversion efficiency of an embarrassing 0.5%.
That's why railguns are used. Also, it's a gun not a transformer.
Адронный коллайдер так же работает вроде
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
🤔Well… There’s no “fire” in _that_ “arm”! 😏…
👍👌
Instead of wrapping the coil wire back and forth, try a single coil, then wrap a completely different coil on top, then a third, ect. Run the coils in parallel.
This will increase the acceleration as the current will flow through all coils simultaneously and in only one direction.
With the demonstrated setup, the magnetic field travels forward, but then backwards, acting as a damper.
Additionally, coils in parallel reduce the overal resistance, allowing more current to flow. More current means stronger magnetic field.
Thanks for the tip
@MagneticGamesIT you can also overlaping the individual coils but will need a more complex timing sequence for initialization. This would require separate capacitor banks for each coil as well.
Not trying to sound some type of way but you very obviously misunderstand the right hand rule and how to wrap a coil.
Also, if you're referring to flyback in the coil, that's still a magnetic field and will still attract the bearing, it's not a magnet he's shooting.
@LittleXtra I am aware of tge right hand rule, and I do understand that the direction of force generated by the magnetic field is perpendicular to the direction of electron flow.
I understand that winding the coil back and forth does generate force in one direction. However, the flow of current is not instantaneous throughout the entire length of the coil. At initial energization, the electrons start flowing at one end and the magnetic field propagated accordingly. The magnetic field moves up and down the coil when it is wrapped back and forth. The direction of force will be in the same direction, but some of the generated force will be wasted as the projectile moves in one direction and the propagation of the magnetic field moves in the opposite direction.
Think of it like blowing compressed air into a tube with a ping pong ball in it.The ball starts close to you air nozzle, you turn on the air and as the ball starts moving, you move the air nozzle down the tube right behind the ball, then you bring the nozzle back to it's starting position while the air is still flowing. The force generated by the air was always in one direction, but on the return path, the distance between the source of force and the projectile grows. This reduces the amount of force applied to the projectile.