Neve 1073DPA 2-channel Microphone Preamp

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 65

  • @sweetwater
    @sweetwater  4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    There's no sound like the 1073 sound! Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more premium Neve gear!

  • @phillipphillip367
    @phillipphillip367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Guys I had this mic pre,
    and I have to tell you a couple of important things.
    Unlike other units, 1073 dpa line inputs are transformerless! Also, instead of a full adjustment of the output volume, there is Trim, which goes down only to -10 dB. It can be a pain in the ass when you have a very hot mic and are trying not to overload your converters. This trim is often not sufficient to reduce the output volume. And if you want to drive input gain harder for "that mojo", this Trim is also pain in the ass. And this is the reason why I sold this preamp.. So keep that in mind!! If you want Ams, you better get 1073 Spx/DPX, with full output level control and transformers in the line inputs, or Bae and so on.

    • @phanosevangelou597
      @phanosevangelou597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But he said they have transformers

    • @phillipphillip367
      @phillipphillip367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@phanosevangelou597 this unit has only mic input transformer and output transformer, but there is NO line input transformer. Line input in this unit is transformerless. Of course, those people who advertise equipment will not be willing to tell you about this.

    • @phanosevangelou597
      @phanosevangelou597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phillipphillip367 forgive my ignorance ( still learning )so I want it for it’s mic line only input /transformers .. in
      That sense it’s ok and not lacking ?

    • @phillipphillip367
      @phillipphillip367 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@phanosevangelou597 If you are using microphone through
      mic input (how we always do it) You will be fine. Signal from the microphone goes through mic input transformer and output transformer. BUT! if you want to run your mixes / individual tracks from the DAW through the 1073 DPA line-in to colorize the sound, this won't work. Because 1073 Dpa is missing the line input transformer (the sound will be clean, without mojo)

    • @phanosevangelou597
      @phanosevangelou597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phillipphillip367 ahhh I see !! Thanks bro ..I guess I could use my Neve Shelford Channel to colorise tracks in that scenario 🤔But I see what you mean , for that money would have been nice to have line too

  • @OHHnoYOUdidntMAN
    @OHHnoYOUdidntMAN 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was used on the mix summing chain (for crunch) for Tame Impala's Currents

  • @yettielusive3370
    @yettielusive3370 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    And that’s as close to a perfect sounding electric guitar I’ve ever heard

  • @i.shadrin
    @i.shadrin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    57 + 122 combination - so prefect

  • @whistlemusic8572
    @whistlemusic8572 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice to see you plying guitar in your own environment, sounds great brother

  • @richcope387
    @richcope387 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    AMS Neve is the direct descendant of Neve Electronics. They have more right to make the modern 1073 than any of the cloners

  • @Theophanes68
    @Theophanes68 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds absolutely amazing, nice guitar performances!

  • @nickparas7170
    @nickparas7170 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just wondering if adding some red and blue Neve-style knobs to my existing gear will improve my sound.

  • @mickeymiguel2726
    @mickeymiguel2726 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mitch G. A very good teacher

  • @rocnroll0065
    @rocnroll0065 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Smooth with colorful breakup

  • @TheFarout69
    @TheFarout69 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't afford to watch this video. But that would look and sound great in my rack. I love that high quality transformer sound.

  • @poetparrot
    @poetparrot ปีที่แล้ว

    Can this be used for Podcasting with a Shure SM7B ?

  • @marianojefe1
    @marianojefe1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    posible record bass or guitar to line in? I need di box to this?

  • @learnerforever6933
    @learnerforever6933 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could you please explain what’s the difference between the 2 brands: AMS Neve & Rupert Neve Designs? I know each has a relation to Mr. Rupert Neve but I’m very confused why there are 2 companies now? Thanks 🙏🏼

    • @1stCorinthians2_14
      @1stCorinthians2_14 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The first one he founded and no longer has dealings with. RND he started and currently owns. Some of the RND designs are more transparent while some are that thicker sound more in line with the 1073 such as the Shelford Channel. Rupert Neve has started something like 18 companies including Focusrite!

    • @davemccall9594
      @davemccall9594 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      A good analogy might be how Leo Fender went from Fender to Music Man to G&L over the course of his career. Products at each company were largely designed by Leo Fender... just at different stages of his career and with different ideas and lessons learned. AMS Neve owns the original, classic designs and iterates on those. RND is where the current ideas are flowing from. One isn't necessarily better than the other... just different snapshots in time and different ideas.

    • @eman0828
      @eman0828 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rupert has started 3 different companies in his life time, Neve Electronics, Focusrite LLC and Rupert Neve Designs. RND is the current most recent company and the only company that offer genuine Rupert Neve designed equipment. The other two companies Rupert sold in the 80s which he has nothing to do with. He hasn't designed anything for Focusrite or Neve Electornics since he left. The modern AMS/Neve and Focusrite ISA shares very little of his oringal designs. They are just copies.

    • @JanusJanavas
      @JanusJanavas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      > The modern AMS/Neve and Focusrite ISA shares very little of his oringal designs. They are just copies.
      @@eman0828 How so? You can absolutely buy a classic 1073 console module from AMS Neve. Do you really think it shares very little of the original design?

  • @fr_reynolds5002
    @fr_reynolds5002 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does that mean, a mixing preamp?

  • @fernandoobregon3359
    @fernandoobregon3359 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So is theNeve DPA preamp better than the Neve SPX?

    • @bennettshapiro7711
      @bennettshapiro7711 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not if you expect transformers on the line inputs.

    • @JanusJanavas
      @JanusJanavas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      SPX is better; it has an EQ and a line input transformer. DPX is even better, as it is a two-channel version of SPX.

  • @NateJDrums
    @NateJDrums 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So good to see y'all carrying this brand. Now if I can just get my pennies together, will be good to go. 😜

  • @yackohoopy
    @yackohoopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do you have any idea how badly I want Neve anything, but I’ll never be able to afford it. 😞

    • @djRoyalTee
      @djRoyalTee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Says who? You have your whole life to make it happen! Say yes.

    • @BritoWorx
      @BritoWorx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Words are powerful speak what you desire to the universe and you WILL get it.

    • @yackohoopy
      @yackohoopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@djRoyalTee, I’m a working schlub. I live paycheck to paycheck. A $3,000 piece of musical brilliance is just not in the cards for me, but I do LOVE Neve consoles, preamps, EQ’s, and compressors. If I hit the lottery, then, yeah, but until then, it’s just a Dream

    • @djRoyalTee
      @djRoyalTee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@yackohoopy Your hard work will pay off. I remember I had a dream of owning barefoot monitors. I was unemployed and there were no opportunities. LSS, I now mix on Barefoot Monitors.

    • @oscarportillo4814
      @oscarportillo4814 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You never know, stay positive. It's a race but not a marathon. Save and save, eventually, you will get there, this clearly won't get outdated if we are still paying 3000 for gear that basically is from the 70s.
      I'm on the same boat as you, with Neve and other outboard gear.

  • @JanusJanavas
    @JanusJanavas 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No line-input transfomer though ...

  • @dimoscondos
    @dimoscondos 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sorry but for 2600 i can get myself 3 warm audio 273s, and i already have one, i used ams and rupert's 1073, they are in the same ball park, so much that the difference in price is not justified.
    Merry Christmas

    • @eman0828
      @eman0828 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Warm audio uses mostly lower end grade components hence its low price which probably isn't going to last 10 to 20+ years without a hardware failure. It's not considered high end. You pay more for the quality and craftsmanship. Although the AMS stuff is not real Neve stuff. Just copies that has little to do with Rupert Neve as he hasn't designed anything for Neve Electornics since he sold the company in the 80s. Same goes for Focusrite.

    • @dimoscondos
      @dimoscondos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eman0828 sorry to disappoint you but they all get parts from China, there are very few companies producing equipment that are hand built anymore, point to point and all made in USA or UK or Germany.So far all my cheaper equipment worked flawlessly even a behringer headphone amp. To my point. The difference in sound and quality is not what it used to be.

  • @FrancoContreras
    @FrancoContreras 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I gess that for 3.000 bucks it should sound good xD

    • @eman0828
      @eman0828 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it should be the same price as the Focusrite ISA two $899 given it's not original. Rupert Neve has nothing to do with the modern AMS/Neve and Focusrite stuff since he sold both companies in the late 80s. They are just copies and many of the so called classic stuff has changed dramatically that it shares very little I'm common from Ruperts oringal designs.

    • @053DAX
      @053DAX 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check BAE you can get with eq for a bit more.

  • @ryan.9023
    @ryan.9023 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the difference between AMS Neve and Rupert Neve Designs?

    • @1stCorinthians2_14
      @1stCorinthians2_14 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The first one he founded and no longer has dealings with. RND he started and currently owns. Some of the RND designs are more transparent while some are that thicker sound more in line with the 1073 such as the Shelford Channel.

    • @eman0828
      @eman0828 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just like Focusrite Rupert Neve has nothing to do with AMS/Neve. He may be the same man that founded both Focusrite and Neve Electornics but he hasn't designed anything for his two former companies since he sold them both off in the 80s. They are just copies. The modern ISA designs aren't the same as the original one 110. The only thing that's really left is the input transformers that Rupert specified. The rest of the design is totally different. All the AMS/Neve is the same way as very little of his oringal designs remains in the modern products. RND is one of the last companies left he started and is the only real genuine Neve designed outboard gear.

    • @i.shadrin
      @i.shadrin 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eman0828 i actually love AMS stuff

    • @eman0828
      @eman0828 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@i.shadrin I prefer BAE, RND when it comes to the 1073 and real Neve stuff. AMS is much like Focusrite that just makes copies but I also like Focusrite as well.

  • @dimitrisgakis9206
    @dimitrisgakis9206 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No instrument HiZ input... deal breaker

  • @senseiuglydapowerlifter5287
    @senseiuglydapowerlifter5287 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    K

  • @ChristopherczarSmith
    @ChristopherczarSmith 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm so tired of seeing neve pres and people claiming theirs sounds like the original. Go clone something else 🙄

    • @eman0828
      @eman0828 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well it's not a real Neve no way since Rupert Neve himself has nothing to do with AMS/Neve since he sold the company in the 80s. Same for Focusrite. He hasn't designed anything for neither of the two companies he founded since left them.

    • @oompapompaa6543
      @oompapompaa6543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well as they bought him out they bought in on his designs/technical expertise, no? It's being branded as a Neve with the claim to have the classic Neve sound... With the logic that it ain't real cause the founder ain't around then there ain't a whole lot of real products out there of anything classic is it?

    • @caminglis53
      @caminglis53 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eman0828if you know electronics they are exactly the same as a real original 1073 from the early 70S why?
      The components used are the same, - BJTs, circuits the only thing that’s different is relays - switch the gain steps which is not different in electronics result. The main thing that’s hard is have the same is the transformers, in this case head engineer sent the data sheet back out for reproduction by the same company.
      They improved the spec in low gain stage so there is more transparency but driven hard it’s a direct match to the original
      Having said that driven by a fader is how it was originally done…
      The main difference to talk about is the old cap design vs new cap design, old design was warmer (more blurry) new cap design more accurate (transparent) it’s actually more ideal to have the new version as you can do more with them, and it’s nicer to have warmth only coming from the saturation not from caps. No human is gonna sit there and tell the difference between good quality BJTs
      Clones form other companies other than Ams Neve don’t have acess to these transformers so that’s why theirs are different. If they change other parts that are cheaper same issue applies