Quest Shaman Evolution & Fleshshaper Sleeper OP? | Saviors of Uldum | Hearthstone

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ส.ค. 2019
  • Turns out my list was kinda bad so achieving the win rate I had with such a handicap is kind of impressive, right?
    Deck Code: AAECAaoIBu/3AqCAA7mZA72ZA4SnA+GoAwycAt4F7/ECtJEDipQDxpkDpaEDu6UDz6UD1KUD1aUD+aUDAA==
    ········································­········································­····
    WATCH MORE HEARTHSTONE!
    • Constructed: bit.ly/TrumpMoreStandard
    • Arena: bit.ly/TrumpMoreArena
    • Highlights: bit.ly/TrumpHighlights
    • Dungeon runs: bit.ly/DungeonTrump
    • Tavern brawl: bit.ly/TrumpMoreBrawl
    • Tournaments: bit.ly/TrumpTournament
    • Deck teachings: bit.ly/TrumpTeach1
    • Basic teachings: bit.ly/TrumpTeach2
    ········································­········································­····
    FOLLOW TRUMP!
    💗 Subscribe: bit.ly/ValueTown
    💗 Twitch: / trumpsc
    💗 Facebook: / trumpsc
    💗 Twitter: / trumpsc
    ········································­········································­····
    MUSIC
    Frequently used music by Kevin MacLeod
    incompetech.com/music/royalty...
    ········································­········································­····
    ‣ Edited by: jnZaneHD
    ‣ Contact: jnzanehd@gmail.com
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 252

  • @weebvile7965
    @weebvile7965 5 ปีที่แล้ว +559

    2013: 4/7 on turn 3 is OP.
    2019: two 7/8's with Taunt on turn 5 is a strong play.

    • @kokofisher
      @kokofisher 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      well, realistic in terms of human progression as well...back 500 years ago muskets were OP...look at what we have now

    • @oDWreckz
      @oDWreckz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +135

      @@kokofisher we now have gays

    • @Misterzen87
      @Misterzen87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      @@oDWreckz are you trying to say that gays are superior weapons to muskets? Do they outfit shame the enemies into defeat?

    • @spysideways7824
      @spysideways7824 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@oDWreckz lol 😂

    • @MountainSnowInc
      @MountainSnowInc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Misterzen87 I certainly hope so. 😊

  • @mrmac2340
    @mrmac2340 5 ปีที่แล้ว +215

    2:57
    "I guess we'll waste the Rush."
    "I will NOT be RUSHED!"

  • @AICHeadBanger
    @AICHeadBanger 5 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    Tess Greymane: "You have no idea what I'm capable of!"
    *crickets chirping*

    • @candy-ass4915
      @candy-ass4915 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      imagine if amalgam was still in play. value value

    • @TimoRutanen
      @TimoRutanen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep, still no idea!

  • @projectx5154
    @projectx5154 5 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    First opponent's name: NeverAgain
    Second opponent's name: SnipedAgain
    I see a pattern

  • @mcducknorris9167
    @mcducknorris9167 5 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    i told him, the actual madman was trying to give questing explorer 1 star

  • @hanthony
    @hanthony 5 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    It's simple... I play Barnes, shadowstep him, play Barnes again

    • @Devinblox726
      @Devinblox726 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Is that a darkmane reference?

    • @pedrof4458
      @pedrof4458 5 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      And summon the 🅱️ancient One!

    • @Kryptnyt
      @Kryptnyt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pedrof4458 We kill the 🅱️atman

    • @Adirbal
      @Adirbal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@pedrof4458 Gruul's only weakness

    • @tood7614
      @tood7614 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The ancient one is giving lots of blood today!!

  • @MechaKnightz
    @MechaKnightz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    I've never laughed so much at a Trump video as when he said "wait, that's illegal" after seeing Gruul die

    • @carterlist5766
      @carterlist5766 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      GRUUL, NOOOOOOO

    • @phoenix6890
      @phoenix6890 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You're a fool to think you're as strong as gruul

    • @Taigon15
      @Taigon15 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I found it entertaining that someone sent him a message saying lol... as he said it.

  • @Gothstana
    @Gothstana 5 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Ah yes, Mogu, the sleeper card that is..
    *checks notes*
    .. run in every single Quest Shaman list.

    • @JCDGAMING01
      @JCDGAMING01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Trist in Sox I think the emphasis wasn’t on running mogu, but instead in NOT running mutate

    • @backseatsamurai
      @backseatsamurai 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      as of 3 days ago only....the Trump effect! now its everywhere.

  • @MeatyCatLegs
    @MeatyCatLegs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    8:00 With captions on. Trump has quite a skill.

    • @CorpseMarine
      @CorpseMarine 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I dont understand how youtube could think that was the word he said

    • @MS31459
      @MS31459 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lul

    • @tood7614
      @tood7614 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Demonitized

    • @Redhotquagmire
      @Redhotquagmire 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      "...would be pretty nice".
      Get your minds out of the gutter, ya penises. Lol

  • @audreygirard1411
    @audreygirard1411 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I think shaman might be damaging the man, this expansion. He's being converted into a being of pure value.

    • @Redhotquagmire
      @Redhotquagmire 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you sure you didn't mean...
      ...evolving? :D

  • @2ndCel
    @2ndCel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    "Poorly performing cards"
    Woah, woah, woah... you're telling me that Bog Slosher's not a good card??

  • @jacobcosta387
    @jacobcosta387 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Turn 2 4/7 vs. Turn 4 8/8
    Nice

  • @HighLanderPonyYT
    @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How do you beat this deck? It's absolutely insane.
    Ok, I tried going 99% face against it and ended up winning. Could've been just me highrolling and them lowrolling though.

  • @davidemaj5683
    @davidemaj5683 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Siamat - x2 battle cry? (turn 9 VS rogue)
    Does it work?

  • @fizzleqt
    @fizzleqt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    like the only channel i actually watch the outro on

  • @streepken1543
    @streepken1543 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    love the end theme song so much!

  • @MadManMad
    @MadManMad 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    well almost 20 games in so far with this deck . and never have i even once drawn questing explorer before my quest was finished.

  • @Luskus
    @Luskus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where does this “the madman” clip come from?

    • @Luskus
      @Luskus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Costel Coaie well yeah, but is it not a soundbite from a different vid?

  • @Sj-bp8dx
    @Sj-bp8dx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Title: Quest Shaman Evolution & Fleshshaper Sleeper OP?
    Start of the video: "But I found that the winrate of mutate isn't very high so I think Mogu Fleshshaper is good AS IS without mutate"

    • @baqua8749
      @baqua8749 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Trump though lowly of that card that's why he's called a madman

    • @dcsddsify
      @dcsddsify 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      he means that the deck evolved

    • @Avatarbee
      @Avatarbee 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      you can still use lackys to evolve so mutate might be unneccesary

    • @vaalesha2278
      @vaalesha2278 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      He's not talking about the mechanic evolution, he's talking about how his Quest Shaman deck has evolved into a different form.

  • @Robbie1okay
    @Robbie1okay 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just want to know what that ending song is, pretty sure it isn't on the kevin macleod royalty free site and if it is it'd be nice to at least give the title

    • @giantsquid5636
      @giantsquid5636 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      m.th-cam.com/video/lMhpHgqIQdQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @Robbie1okay
      @Robbie1okay 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, I don't really watch any hearthstone stuff other than trump and trolden's vids and both used the song without giving a link so I had no idea where it came from.

  • @HelloHello3401
    @HelloHello3401 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're not running big slosher in this deck, but why does it double buff the minion it returns when used with heart of vir'naal? Surely it cant return the minion to your hand twice so it should not buff it twice?

  • @PerfectCel7
    @PerfectCel7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    disappointed Sludge Slurper doesn't burp twice when it's Battlecry triggers twice

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thankfully it doesn't overload twice when it's battlecry triggers twice.

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arnowisp6244 Why would it though? You aren't playing the card twice.

  • @netiora
    @netiora 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Trump: "Value, value, value, value, value"
    wise words....

  • @Ryniano
    @Ryniano 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Am i the only one whos dying to know what card the 2 behind his chair is

  • @Chocl8215
    @Chocl8215 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    24:25 Visions of egg, therefore be wary of value.

  • @Miklaous
    @Miklaous 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How good is hex in this?

  • @lolroco
    @lolroco 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The hand man!

  • @Begeru
    @Begeru 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who thought that Mogu Fleshaper was bad? Like if a 3 mana 3/3 Rush sees play why wouldn't it be?

  • @starmstrong2062
    @starmstrong2062 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mogu and the 3 1/1's that cost 3 are welcome additions to wild evolve shaman.

  • @pub795
    @pub795 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love when he starts talking in Value

  • @hanselmanryanjames
    @hanselmanryanjames 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does Ancestral Spirit stack? Didn't get an answer

    • @JohnJohnson-vq7ze
      @JohnJohnson-vq7ze 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does stack, but if you're referring to the part at 6:30, the reason Trump says it "does work" is because casts The Storm Bringer before Ancestral Spirit, which is good because transformation removes enchantments like Ancestral Spirit, but then he realizes that if he uses the double battlecry hero power before he plays the Horror, it will cast Stormbringer -> Ancestral Spirit -> 2nd Stormbringer which removes the first Ancestral Spirit ->2nd Ancestral Spirit. Playing that Horror with the hero power wouldn't really be any different from playing it without the hero power.

    • @theecrunchytaco5501
      @theecrunchytaco5501 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, if you cast ancestral spirit onto something twice, when it dies, two copies of it will happen

  • @0A01amir
    @0A01amir 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Single card quest shaman is also a great control deck, think about having +5 aladin guy.

  • @TheAnthery
    @TheAnthery 5 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Trump hates Questing Explorer so irrationally just because everyone else jumped on a bandwagon for it.

    • @Red-sv5fu
      @Red-sv5fu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I mean there are a lot of decks out there that shouldn’t be running questing explorer. Like Druid, shaman or rogue because they complete their quest really fast and then it becomes a river croc

    • @Ghostonm
      @Ghostonm 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Red-sv5fu But we just saw Trump saying that Shamans should run it, since the win rate for it is very high

    • @matthew8789
      @matthew8789 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I mean I can agree with running it in shaman because it can help with quest completion and is a river croc at worst (u dont need value in that deck) however it's best played on turn 2 and guess what druid wants to do on turn 2, not use 2 mana so I think it's bad in druid for sure

    • @DeH0810
      @DeH0810 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The good thing about quest explorer (in this deck) is that the battlecry doesn't activate with shudderwock, when a lot of times you're close to fatigue. If you manage to draw before finishing the quest, of course

    • @TheNegronomicon
      @TheNegronomicon 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's an amazing early game card and even just being a 2/3 that does nothing is not the worst thing to play because at that point you should be ahead since your quest is complete.

  • @ysdrJYTEFADJYF
    @ysdrJYTEFADJYF 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think walking fountain is a really insane card atm, almost zilíax level good

    • @lemuelharing4137
      @lemuelharing4137 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Liked just because of the Singed profile pic

  • @raymondtang9228
    @raymondtang9228 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    yea someone help me too i've been trouble beating any control warrior with this deck or any other quest shaman deck (if they have Archivist Elysiana)

  • @Providenza
    @Providenza 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thoughts on running bloodlust as an extra win condition? This deck is able to play wide very easily with lackeys and you can very quickly put 20+ face damage up if they have even a single turn they don't clear. Also found twilight drake can be interesting to mess with a typically runs 15+ health with the double battlecry.

    • @paulsutton7204
      @paulsutton7204 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought the same and tried it, it isa good idea in principle but I haven't had the right conditions often enough. Always the chance with Vulp, Hag & Lackey to pull it.

  • @BenCarnage
    @BenCarnage 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mutate is rarely, but sometimes, a dead card, but sometimes it wins games by itself. My average results with it are pretty good. Besides my hand is often really full, so having the low cost spell often costs me nothing. I also skip Barista. It is super rare that I am in a situation where I would use her at all. Walking Fountain seems a bit slow in this deck, I already have 3 high costs that are super dead in opening hand. Also I found healing to very rarely be relevant beyond lifedrinker. I don't need to outvalue warrior, I usually just kill him before it gets to that point since I can refill my board and make a swampqueen derp combo that sticks sooner or later. I only run one questing, since it is a dead draw in the late game and I use a tech card instead. Either hungry crab or weapon removal (currently hungry crab) since one of the few decks that was able to overpower me a bit too often was murloc when my discovers were bad. Love quest shaman. A lot of skill needed to play it well. Some turns you rope out unless you pick super fast :D

    • @BenCarnage
      @BenCarnage 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @UC4DTHeKf_RgxBQob3shamSQ works if you draw mc-tech and get good steals, preferably while you have a board. Besides, quest shamans run murlocs as well as a few other decks, giving some good tempo. Some games I eat a sludge, sometimes with double battlecries and get a 5/6, which is fair for the low cost or I just fit the crab to fill my curve and complete the quest. It's a cheap battlecry, so it's always ok in the early game just to complete the quest. Turn 5 murloc spell can get pretty nasty if they have a good early game.

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lotsa skill? To me it seemed like they just play on curve, put two and two together removal wise and win with insane card advantage.

    • @BenCarnage
      @BenCarnage 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HighLanderPonyYT Sure, you can sometimes just curve out without much thought and win. But there's a lot of discover and in some version even some random card generation. There may be many solutions to any board state and many reasonable options from discover. It is also a bit tricky some turns to properly calculate costs and damge. You also play very differently depending on your opponent. You're a defensive/control deck vs murloc pal, quest pal, zoo. An aggro/zoo deck against some control/combo decks. A value/otk deck against control warriors. All your discovers and value plays shift around heavily as well as how you treat your minions.
      You don't need skill to play the deck, but to play it well you definitely do.

  • @aedraxis3011
    @aedraxis3011 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I cut Barista and one walking Fountain for 2 Bog Slosher - even more value ;)

  • @DenkiRay
    @DenkiRay 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a surprise, who would have expected Beaming Sidekick to not be a good card except on zoo (or when someone for some reason decide to play arena)?

  • @pitic6555
    @pitic6555 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    all gangsta until evil totem starts making value

  • @spysideways7824
    @spysideways7824 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    2nd victory was insane !

  • @gecgoodpasi1654
    @gecgoodpasi1654 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The warrior matchup stats are from the dumbo take 10 fresh cards card 😑 dont remeber her name atm but i played warrior a couple of times it basicly automaticlly goes to fatigue because both are so good at clearing boards (well there is maybe a magicly barista out but i wouldnt count on it as it needs alot of handspace)

  • @Redhotquagmire
    @Redhotquagmire 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:30 you went from NeverAgain to SnipedAgain.
    ...I guess it happened again. Lol

  • @ward7721
    @ward7721 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My two first time evolving flesh aper I got hirek

  • @SabuuTheLutalo
    @SabuuTheLutalo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think he had lethal at 24:50. If he used hero power and wasp then traded a 1/1 for more board space it would do 12 burst. With the 7 damage on board that would make 19 damage which would kill him.

    • @SabuuTheLutalo
      @SabuuTheLutalo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markussteiner8951 oh yea u right woops

  • @mrooaoo1175
    @mrooaoo1175 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So Shaman or Druid? !

  • @blakearius
    @blakearius 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I cheated out akali and it drew me mogu - 2 cost 7/8 with rush..

  • @robertlefeaux
    @robertlefeaux 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I get questing explorer in unusually large percentage of my opening hands, feels like 50% or more

    • @Alucula
      @Alucula 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is that unusual? If you're playing two in a quest deck and mulling for it, every card you see is at worst 2 out of 29 to be questing, and you're seeing 2 starting cards + 2 mulligan cards + 2 draw steps for 6 chances to find a questing by turn 2, and that's on the play.

    • @robertlefeaux
      @robertlefeaux 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Alucula I dont mull for it specifically. There's several 2-cost cards total but this one seems to show up the most by a large margin.

    • @Simon-ow6td
      @Simon-ow6td 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If my math hasn't completely rotted away:
      On the play, if you mull anything but quest or adventurer, you have a ~38% chance to have it by turn 2 (6 cards looked at), and on the draw that chance is 48% (8 cards looked at).
      If nothing is up with the card (and I doubt it) you should have a ~48% chanse of drawing at least one of two cards in your first 8 cards looked at (based on you running a quest).

    • @TimoRutanen
      @TimoRutanen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "Feels like" means it's the selective memory bias. You remember the times you had it, but not so much the times you didn't. This happens more with cards that you don't NEED to win. If you immediately lost the game where you didn't have it, you'd remember not having it a lot more.

    • @robertlefeaux
      @robertlefeaux 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TimoRutanen Thanks for the psychology lesson. If it weren't for you I never would have known the difference between "definitely is" and "feels like".

  • @Viddaric
    @Viddaric 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    13:37 he is speaking the language of gods.

    • @Busketroll
      @Busketroll 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      VALLEY, VALLEY, VALUE

  • @Stand_By_For_Mind_Control
    @Stand_By_For_Mind_Control 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How fitting that guy's name being 'sniped again'.

  • @corneliussmith5875
    @corneliussmith5875 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just beat a worrier deck just now. This deck is so much fun.

  • @OriginalKarasu
    @OriginalKarasu 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y do i have all cards and cant pass rank 5??? :)

    • @lollopollqo2240
      @lollopollqo2240 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe you are bad at the game, or maybe you are really unlucky. Or maybe you are just trolling

  • @Mene0
    @Mene0 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A version that I "refined"

  • @dcb289
    @dcb289 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GRUUL
    *THAT’S IMPOSSIBLEEEEEE*

  • @MasterOfInfinity
    @MasterOfInfinity 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Replacement for Lynchen?

    • @FunkyDexter
      @FunkyDexter 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      InfinityMaster bog slosher. I think you could even run 2 cutting one questing explorer (which even I am not crazy about)

  • @Xevo234
    @Xevo234 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    dont you think that novice engineers in this deck are a bit overkill? This deck creates so much cards itself and drawing too much with shudderwock may cause quicker fatigue

  • @onjimana
    @onjimana 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jens are you asking me or telling me with the title?

  • @gubazoltan99
    @gubazoltan99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just spent about 6k dust crafting the previous deck
    Trump in his new video: Well the original deck was not good lmfao

    • @backseatsamurai
      @backseatsamurai 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and thats why you should learn to make your own decks and stop copying everyone else. thats the biggest problem with HS imo. the meta is settled in days cuz evryone just copy and paste nowadays,.not me. i like to get value from my collection of cards....i use them even if some are bad..lol

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@backseatsamurai Nah, netdecking is fine, just wait longer for a more settled meta.

    • @SonicMegaKing
      @SonicMegaKing 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HighLanderPonyYT Netdecking is why this game becomes boring two weeks after every expansion.

  • @TheFuzzician
    @TheFuzzician 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    isn't Shudderwock a bit overkill? Anytime I had it in my hand, i was never in any danger of running low on value.

    • @CrazyRhinoceros
      @CrazyRhinoceros 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Fuzzician if you want to lose mirror by default you can not run it

    • @jakubskonieczny5750
      @jakubskonieczny5750 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's strange because when I play against shamans they always out of cards and beat me with shudderwock ;p

    • @TheFuzzician
      @TheFuzzician 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jakubskonieczny5750 You guys must have a different build than I do. I use the 3/3 that bounces a card back and gives it +2/2. With that, you can double up on the Horrors, or stuff like the 1/1 that summons a 5/5. Even stuff like Sludge Slurper get a lot of mileage in the deck.

    • @jakubskonieczny5750
      @jakubskonieczny5750 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheFuzzician I don't have the deck, I hate it because it does unfair stuff and completing quest is way to easy with lackys. But when I play against them I try to pressure them as hard as possible (not even with aggro deck) I'm close to winning because they have like 2-3 cards and below 15 hp and than they shudderwock and I lose because after that I never seen shaman losing.

    • @jakubskonieczny5750
      @jakubskonieczny5750 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheFuzzician But you might be right, maybe my opponents don't run these cards and they run out of value. Still I would definitly run shudder, it just too good to not be played.

  • @MrSnoozo
    @MrSnoozo 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tried out this deck, ½ way through i swapped one of the mogu for zephrys... if i remember right, i went 9-12 @ Rank 10 on EU. my auto loss scenario was pretty much shaman mirror'ish decks, or control warrior (for god sake, 20+ min pr game.... zZzzZz)

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The fact that running Zephrys in a non singleton deck isn't a bad move goes to show how powerful he is.

  • @CamaradaArdi
    @CamaradaArdi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Control warrior indeed outvalues quest shaman. I know right? Egregious!

  • @undyingentropy6736
    @undyingentropy6736 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I find that quest shaman functions a lot better as a burn deck with the fire ele version, I personally cut a Mutate for an earthquake for murloc paladin's early nomi if they get the nuts, or to just clean a board in general, all burn goes face and gg
    ### Fire Earthquake
    # Class: Shaman
    # Format: Standard
    # Year of the Dragon
    #
    # 1x (0) Mutate
    # 1x (1) Corrupt the Waters
    # 2x (1) Sludge Slurper
    # 2x (2) EVIL Cable Rat
    # 2x (2) EVIL Totem
    # 2x (2) Novice Engineer
    # 2x (2) Questing Explorer
    # 2x (2) Sandstorm Elemental
    # 2x (3) Bog Slosher
    # 2x (3) Mind Control Tech
    # 2x (3) Weaponized Wasp
    # 2x (4) Lifedrinker
    # 2x (5) Former Champ
    # 2x (6) Fire Elemental
    # 1x (7) Earthquake
    # 2x (7) Mogu Fleshshaper
    # 1x (9) Shudderwock
    #
    AAECAfe5AgTv9wK0lwOQpwPhqAMNvQGcAt4F7/ECi4UDq4wDtJEDxpkDu6UDz6UD1KUD1aUD+aUDAA==
    #
    # To use this deck, copy it to your clipboard and create a new deck in Hearthstone

    • @MrSabotax
      @MrSabotax 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you wanna face dmg you could use that new crocolisk for 8 mana, which turns into pyroblast with heropower

  • @TheKodaPup72
    @TheKodaPup72 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    good job hearthstone trump

  • @theodorerojas8906
    @theodorerojas8906 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does Siamat work with druid quest?

    • @Baconator4579
      @Baconator4579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ?

    • @Baconator4579
      @Baconator4579 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Theodore Rojas oh I don’t know

    • @gloomylobster111
      @gloomylobster111 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wardruid Loti works with Quest Druid so I assume Siamat is no different

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, it doesn't say Choose One in its text.

  • @MissAshley42
    @MissAshley42 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mayor is _IN._

  • @kingragnar647
    @kingragnar647 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you really hate Questing Explorer that much? Yeah in some quest decks it's not that great but in others such as Rogue and Mage it's pretty good. Plus its 2/3 for 2, arent those good stats for a 2 drop?

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thing is it's in a weird spot for shaman since you finish the quest so quickly that its just a 2/3 for 2.
      For other classes where the quest isn't done. It's good.
      Even then it's in a weird spot were you run it in a quest deck but becomes a dead 2/3 when you finish the quest. ( Which you will because it's a quest deck.)

  • @freewareplayer
    @freewareplayer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is noone running a copy of Bloodlust in a deck that ends up having lots of tokens on board in a lot of cases?

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't need it when you're gonna burn them with battlecries anyway.

  • @michaelling6451
    @michaelling6451 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    lol the captions at 8:00

  • @gizel4376
    @gizel4376 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    this quest is stupidly OP, i open it in a pack, and decide to make a deck without crafting a single card, i just add a bunch of random battlecry minion and it work

  • @DuanJB
    @DuanJB 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow new meta deck shaman....great
    New meta quest control warrior shaman

  • @tkell31
    @tkell31 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That rogue deck was...interesting...

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was a pirate rougue deck. You can find the list online. It's sadly a tier 3.

  • @ianisz2178
    @ianisz2178 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    12:23 casually heals for 23

  • @dujeroso4067
    @dujeroso4067 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    But does agro just rekts u?

    • @ethanhopper2467
      @ethanhopper2467 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've played the deck quite a bit. Lackeys and Sandstorm Elemental help a lot in the early game, I haven't had much trouble with aggro

    • @dujeroso4067
      @dujeroso4067 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ethanhopper2467 guess its just my luck then lol

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only if your draw is horrible. (Speaking from the aggro side.)

  • @yakojjy
    @yakojjy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I stopped running Questing Adventurer. It basically becomes a dead useless card in your deck after turn 4. No need to draw anyway. Quest Shaman has so much value coming in regardless.

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Explorer

    • @CrypticSilhouett
      @CrypticSilhouett 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shaman can most definitely use more value on the early bits of the game. Card draw is good. Card draw that furthers your quest on a battlecry that doesn't trigger off shudderwok when you're worried about fatigue by that point against warrior is a VERY big deal.

    • @yakojjy
      @yakojjy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CrypticSilhouett Yeah but Shaman doesn't need the value through draw. Between Lackeys and all the discover stuff my hand is usually chock full all game. I got Warrior covered I just shoved an Archivist in my deck. :D
      Right now my main problems are big summon mage and quest paladin. Started to experiment with Plague of Murlocs as a mass devolve. Not much else you can do when Pally starts cloning those eggs and dragon mech death rattles.

  • @hurotiz
    @hurotiz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found that you don’t need to include spells in quest shaman, between discover a spell lackeys, vulpera scoundrels and arcane dynamo. I generate my own win conditions and board clears. I would rather every single card in the deck generate value in some way than topdeck another hex when I need a minion. I find I tend to have a lot of boards filled with 1/1s and other low creatures so being able to consistently pull a bloodlust with arcane dynamo has won me many games without sacrificing deck-space with useless filler. Do not turn all your monsters into legendaries. Octowhatsit will destroy you by drawing your entire deck 😂. The hero power makes this possible, discovering additional spells and minions every turn is insane value.

  • @acancaacanca926
    @acancaacanca926 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You really have to be something special to think questing explorer is anything but amazing tbh.

  • @gimmedattutorial
    @gimmedattutorial 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would replace the mc tech, you used it a grand total of one time in all of these games, including against aggro. Amazing deck otherwise!

  • @xana3790
    @xana3790 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine dropping togwaggle without a lackey

  • @5sssnakeee3
    @5sssnakeee3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dont sleep on Frostlord! 5 minions on the board (which is easy to achieve) makes him a 12/12 after the quest is complete.

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or just go for Sea giant.

    • @5sssnakeee3
      @5sssnakeee3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arnowisp6244 Sea giant cant become a 16/16

    • @5sssnakeee3
      @5sssnakeee3 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arnowisp6244 ya I guess the 0 mana thing is some insane value as well

    • @gloomylobster111
      @gloomylobster111 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@5sssnakeee3 But it's an 8/8 by default that's cost can be reduced

  • @glebgrits1143
    @glebgrits1143 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does Trump think that building a value quest rogue isn't the right way to do it? I've had some experience with it and it's mediocre against aggro, but it pretty easily outvalues literally all decks in the late game(toss a togwaggle's scheme and combo with tess to make infinite board floods). It's not that slow either.

  • @patriciabernal8254
    @patriciabernal8254 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    New sub!!! 💖💖

  • @paulsutton7204
    @paulsutton7204 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't get my butt off rank 10 with this deck... my fault not the decks :(

  • @ethanhopper2467
    @ethanhopper2467 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think your version is actually too value heavy. I've been playing the mutate version with no hagatha or lynchen and I still have no trouble at all winning against control while being much better at stablizing the board.

    • @baqua8749
      @baqua8749 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What!?!? You find enough value without them? I don't use them too but I feel like you need more value against control

    • @ressult943
      @ressult943 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Control warrior still out value everything^^

    • @baqua8749
      @baqua8749 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ressult943there are I think 3-4 decks that counter warrior but they are weak against other deck

  • @chanokchonthongkrue5300
    @chanokchonthongkrue5300 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much value would the card have to have to actually be able to make trump say that's too much value lmao

  • @krauser3806
    @krauser3806 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    His last second plays really grinds my gears.

  • @berncastell
    @berncastell 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck needs at least 1 lightning storm, imposible to win vs murloc paly without it

    • @jeremiahschmidt6399
      @jeremiahschmidt6399 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not an unwinnable matchup by any means, but it relies on some luck without it. Getting the quest completed by the time they drop the Tip the Scales lets you counter with hero power + Sandstorm Elemental to clear 80% of the board and then mop up with any minions you'd left on the board. Alternatively, getting some spell lackeys early on lets you discover aoe which has won me several matches against them. Lastly, hero power + 1 or 2 mind control techs can be a strong counter to Tip the Scales as well, once again mopping up with any leftover minions you had from their Prismatic Lens turn. Mogu Fleshshaper is also great to help mop up the Tip the Scales turns since he's a 0 mana play into that board.
      So all in all, the lightning storm is a bit more reliable for clearing Tip the Scales, but as long as you can get an early quest completion you'll have several other options available. And winrates drastically improve if they don't get Prismatic Lens on 4. If Murloc Paladin becomes a huge deck in the meta, it might be worth teching the lightning storm, but until then I'm happy with my other options.

    • @berncastell
      @berncastell 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jeremiahschmidt6399 I agree 100%, the problem is when they get it on turn 5 and your quest is at 4 or 5, they still had board from past turns, thats why i think is not a bad keep for the deck

    • @jeremiahschmidt6399
      @jeremiahschmidt6399 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Usually I find if they're getting it on 5, I've got the board. They'd have had to cast Prismatic Lens on 4 which gives you time to gain tempo and take the board. That said, if you get a slow start and can't catch up then the lightning storm could certainly be a life saver.

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I play Tip Pally, doubled Sandstorm fks me hard.

  • @swim2themooon
    @swim2themooon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    quest shaman and hagatha is just kazakus with bran change my mind

  • @alexkok5748
    @alexkok5748 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I know its early into the expansion, but quest shaman seems blatantly overpowered

  • @FafliXx
    @FafliXx 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    He only managed to defeat your Gruul because it wasn't golden.

  • @Nivek5101
    @Nivek5101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anybody else feel like all decks are run with 5-6 legendaries this season and as a casual player its just not possible to get one top tier deck?

    • @arnowisp6244
      @arnowisp6244 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Last expansion token druid was tier one and unless you were present or had an account during the free snip-snap giveaway you had a very cheap tier one deck.

    • @jakubskonieczny5750
      @jakubskonieczny5750 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I had the same feeling. I have 3 decks right now: Quest Rogue (only Tess required), Quest Priest (Can do with only quest and rares) and Quest Paladin (legendary spell, Tyrion which is classic i guess everybody has). Now I look at like highlander hunter or sandwich mage and it blows my mind the number of legendaries any good deck requirs.
      Also I would like to recommand (if you don't have) replacing Siamat with 8 mana neutral 3/15 which kills smalls things multiple times. Less flexible but deals against aggro and that's the main concern because in value these control decks are just fine.

    • @paulsutton7204
      @paulsutton7204 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Shaman deck with the highest winrate on HSreplay only has one legendary. 61% Shaman Murloc w/ Scargil. HERE: hsreplay.net/decks/#maxDustCost=0&sortBy=winrate&playerClasses=SHAMAN

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea, even aggro decks can have 3-4 leggos, 2-4 epics, and some rares in them nowadays. Before, you could run decks with 1-2 rares and nothing rarer. It's crazy.

    • @HighLanderPonyYT
      @HighLanderPonyYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jakubskonieczny5750 Batterhead. Once a mage got it off Conjurer's... Vs my aggro... Fk this game sometimes. ResidentSleeper

  • @zhongzhenpronouncedassciss7060
    @zhongzhenpronouncedassciss7060 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Trump thinking a 2 mana 2/3 that draws a card being overrated is one of the weirdest and therefore - Trumpiest move ever.

    • @EpixGaminginc
      @EpixGaminginc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Some quests are completed too fast. I don't want to play a 2 2/3.

    • @Begeru
      @Begeru 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      it's bad if you finish the quest

  • @ashoka9306
    @ashoka9306 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    questing explorer will be the card that everybody will make fun of trump for misrating it

  • @William-Stewart
    @William-Stewart 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    LoL I made this deck xD like with my own brain and I consider myself to be a measly peasant at rank 18. though I prefer the shaman 3/3 that returns a minion to your hand and adds +2+2 for double battelcry on Lackeys

  • @PagingDoctorGuy
    @PagingDoctorGuy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still stand by playing highlander shaman for the next long while since they ruined any chance of elemental shaman... you know... the fucking reason a shaman exists... for elemental synergy
    (cries in frost lich jaina)

  • @leonardomilions4008
    @leonardomilions4008 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh man, he is so greed

  • @regaleagle8152
    @regaleagle8152 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nah i fimg against aggro mutate is key

  • @leftovermakeover2597
    @leftovermakeover2597 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Trump make it a singleton! it's worth it !

  • @010THEMASTER
    @010THEMASTER 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Call this deck "pem pem shaman"

  • @atlas6538
    @atlas6538 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That first priest played very poorly. He should not have blade master circle. Just blade master would have been fine. Quest shaman has very few ways to kill it t3. Wasting both circle like that is an easy way to lose.

  • @juanvalenzuela2020
    @juanvalenzuela2020 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Eighty-fifth