Not if he has seen how Rodrigo Santoro usually looks like, and the chances are, he has watched the "300" behind the scenes, as well as interviews with the cast.
The Floating Pen in 2001 was so memorable that in the sequel 2010 they had another scene with a floating pen, but, they couldn't get it to stick to glass reliably and ended up compositing in a pen in post.
The floating pen always bothered me because its path through the cabin space is so clearly circular around a center point, unlike in reality where it would float linearly. The pen could spin on axis but that isn’t what we see and it just hurts because they could have put the pen in the center of the disc and moved the whole sheet in one direction and it would look even more amazing and accurate. It was still a pure piece of magic for 1968 and an iconic scene. The attention to detail of Floyd’s hand floating in space does look so eerily realistic and the care the stewardess uses in going down the cabin like she’s only steady because of her Velcro shoes and hands... purely beautiful.
@@CharlieQuartz When seen in the theater if you look closely when the stewardess takes the pen there is a small smudge of glue just barely visible on the glass.
CinemaTyler did a pretty much unbeatable series on the production of 2001. It details more than just the effects, but you can find the parts you want pretty easily. Highly recommend watching the whole thing. Episode one: th-cam.com/video/AgNyCluIRhA/w-d-xo.html
I literally just watched 2001 yesterday, and was in awe and disbelief that how did Kubrick pull off that kinda vfx in 1968! Thank you so much. After all the explanations, it's even more mind boggling. Kubrick was a genius!
Not only did he recognize that Rodrigo Santoro was Xerxes, but that guy was so unrecognizable as Xerxes that he was cast in the sequel as a completely different character. Also Westworld
Please do: "Alien Covenant" - Michael Fassbender playing a flute with himself and: "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" - the scene when he tries to fill the shell with water. I don't know if it was a difficult effect to make, but it tricks my mind in such a weird way, I'm always transfixed while watching it.
Good suggestions - I remember watching Prince in the theatre and that scene gave me the chills... It was so eerie. Then of course, the inferi come and it goes to another level.
It's both incredible and also kind of sad that after all these decades 2001 still stands up so well. I only saw it a few years ago and was blown away by it and I genuinely believe that wasn't just because of how long ago it was made. Keep up the great work guys. Peace.
It'd also be cool if they looked at the initial pirates reveal, with the pirates working the ship as the camera pans. I think it might be one continuous shot, but I might be misremembering it.
You guys should definitely react to the cgi in Disney’s “Dinosaur” from 2000. They have a really interesting mix of practical sets and effects with the dinosaurs obviously being entirely cg. Especially the scene when they’re running from the meteor towards the beginning. You can tell it’s a practical miniature with real explosions but they have the cg dinosaur comped in and it’s really interesting. I’d love to see it in a future video. It was one of my favorite films as a kid and I’m just now rewatching it on Disney+ because nostalgia.
Harry potter prisoner of azkaban : Boggart introduction scene. The camera goes through the mirror seamlessly. I really like that scene and would like your take on it.
Replying to my own garbage for a second here to remind everyone that this movie was filmed in 1968. Remember the special effects from most projects back then? Star Trek, a television show that was almost always under-budget, still looked halfway _decent_ most of the time when it came to the space scenes (specifically), but this movie just straight-up changed the game. _2001: A Space Odyssey_ wasn't just ahead of its time, it was ahead of films that would come out almost 20 years later. That's completely bananas.
Stanley Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he actually invented a wormhole generator and sent an astronaut through it to obtain that footage. The astronaut's dead now, but still...great, great movie.
I've always thought that The World's End and Scott Pilgrim have some of the most impressive CGI I've ever seen. It's so seamless that you genuinely don't know what was done practically and what was CG, and all the effects hold up so perfectly. It's incredible.
@@MC-ew7sc Notice they were on the Corridor site there, not here. It was a subtle plug to try to get people to go over there, if you didn't notice that, lol.
Deathbrewer Ah damn. Didn’t realize they had a site, but that makes sense. Sadly I can’t watch it in 4K on my iPad and I’d much rather watch it on my TV in 4K, but I don’t see a way to cast or share it. Do you know if there’s a way to do that?
MrJagermeister it’s possible to buy a cable that hooks up hdmi to the iPad, depends on the tv but you can use Bluetooth, I’d suggest googling how to do it with your specific tv
You should do the skeletons from Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl next. I watched the movie a couple days ago and I think the VFX is pretty solid.
For the most part, yes. There are a few CG shots in the movie that look a little wonky and goofy here and there. But for me, the most incredible effect of that movie was that out of the film's 600 VFX shots, I think a quarter or almost half of those shots were used to digitally paint out modern sail boats from the backgrounds. I'm being serious.
-> The set was 38 feet (12 m) in diameter. -> the target g-force need to jog proberly without constantly loosing traction should be somewhere between the 0.38 on mars and the 1.0 on earth. Let's pick 0.6 g for now. Now using SpinCalc, an an artificial-gravity calculator, this would mean the angular velocity (this is the spin rate) would be 9.45 rotations/minute or 1 rotation every 6.3 seconds! *According to SpinCalc this would mean the value is too high for comfort since your tangential velocity would be over 13 miles per hour. It instead recommends a diameter of about at least 130 feet (40m) to reach the comfort zone, where little or no adaptation would be needed.* you can play around with these numbers over at -> artificial-gravity dot com/sw/SpinCalc/
According to that site your original number are in a range where it might work after a lengthy adaptation and I don't think that would necessarily be a completely blocker for a mission like this if say cost goes up sufficiently quickly with size! And that's with your 0.6g requirement which might be much too high.. or not! The available rotational data is at best "conflicting" but at least we have some, for gravity requirement we pretty much have NO data beyond "0g is bad long-term, 1g is fine". But in the movie they have rotational infrastructure in space and moon bases so they should have much better idea on the safe range. If the required gravity is 0.46g or less this brings the rotation into a range where all parameter is into "some sources think at least some people would be fine without lengthy adaptation", and for this mission we can assume both careful selection of persons for rotational tolerance and a long adaptation period! We also don't know if they planned to rotate the wheel at the same speed at the destination so it's possible only the two pilots are ultra-hardy and carefully adapted and the mission is planned with say half the gravity while the scientists where awake. I'm not sure I'd be willing to completely rule out even 0.8g in a 12m wheel completely, again, not enough data. OTOH, some sources claim it's supposed to be rotating at 3 mph which leads to 0.015g at 12m! That we can rule out, he can't possibly run like that in gravity anywhere near that low and increasing the size reduces the gravity even further due to using mph as measurement, without spending time to analyze how he's running I think it's clear it's not micro-gravity at least and I think likely at least double the moons gravity. Without actual analysis I'm not sure if we can rule out say 0.45g.
@@Torbjorn.Lindgren true, I was taking into account that you can clearly see that he is not getting mad air with every step and has no trouble getting a good grip with every step. You can't run but merely bounce awkwardly on the moon and possibly on Mars too. That's why I picked 0.6 for starters. Good addition!
@@unreal2236 I think you mean This Is The End? Yeh both those movies came out the same year. The similarities begin and end there. Unfortunately The World's End came out after and its box office was damaged by people thinking they were similar films. Such a shame as The Worlds End is the better movie and is just as good as the previous two entries in the Cornetto Trilogy.
Not a fan of power rangers dont make fun of me I only saw the pilot episode of mmpr and hated it when I was 9 in 1993 the mmpr movie didn't understand it when I was 12 in 1996 on fox and the sequel on fox too in 1998 i Didn't understand that film either i would agree with you about the effects though🤯
Turbo didn't have much in the way of CGI. Especially when it came to the mecha stuff. That was all miniantures for the combination sequence and a dude in a suit for the mecha fight itself. The 1995 Power Rangers movie had a load of CGI though. That's the one that really looks bad. There's a shot of the cockpit and the camera zooms out to outside the mecha and as it does that the aspect ratio of the rangers in the cockpit changes mid zoom.
There's a shot in Tim Burton's Sleepy Hollow that still holds up pretty well. At the end of the movie when the horseman gets thrown his head back. Pretty good skin/flesh restructuring cgi for 1999.
If you're talking about where Wren says that you would get nauseous or dizzy inside of a Von Braun Rotating Space Station, then no you wouldn't because you need gravity in order to affect your inner ear, without it your body doesnt feel the constant pull in one direction while your body changes orientation. There are videos of Astronauts in the I.S.S. where one will tuck into a ball while the other spins them both vertically and horizontally and they cant even tell. Now they do say that you might feel something if your eyes are open and you're spinning that fast. But jogging in a giant wheel would be fine.
Thank you guys for the great and fun content you constantly provide! As for other material to react to, the Amazon Prime tv show "The Boys" has lots of, what I think, great VFX effects. Cheers!
I think there are a few things that need to be considered. Firstly, the rotating spaceship isn't also fighting the pull of gravity in another direction like the fairground ride. Secondly, they aren't necessarily trying to simulate full Earth gravity in a spaceship anymore that it's necessary to provide full sea level atmospheric pressure, so the rate of rotation may not be as extreme as you imagine it to be. Also, a midway ride doesn't give you any time to acclimate or adjust to the effect like an extended space voyage would, kind of like getting your sea legs on a ship.
Wren : Explains about the side effects of G force on a human body! Niko : Why are you looking at us?😂 The same which happens in schools while taking seminars and that one guy explains everything! 😂
Sure, but you're paying a unionized staff of cameraman and lighting techs and whoever moves the painted frame (grips?) in the background the whole time. The rendering may need babysitting, but not to the same degree.
But this wasn't something you just leave and go to bed. It's an intricate mechanical device that needed to be watched over and fiddled with after every frame.
We actually studied 2001 in my physics class: that ring is pretty big, and it's rotating to give just under 1 g. The reason being that because gravity is radial, everything is "pulled" out, not necessarily down, and it would mess with your brain too much. Mir in Armageddon, on the other hand, would have almost a full g difference between your feet and your head, and would be spinning at 3 Hz.
The earliest Doctor Who intros were a form of video feedback, pointing the camera at the screen it's hooked up to. It's called howlround in Britain. There's a nice TH-cam video that talks about the various Doctor Who intro effects and goes into some detail on the slit scan intro. th-cam.com/video/ylyXb-ZDnnA/w-d-xo.html
Here’s one I recently came across: Captain America: The Winter Soldier Peggy Carter VFX aging. The movement of her skin while she’s talking around her neck and face looks like a CGI layer but it’s doesn’t move like skin should. There’s some articles online talking about the process of how much practical make-up they used vs VFX. For 2014 however, I think it falls pretty short of Marvel quality. Other than that, spectacularly film!
I still remember that day in 2013 when I went to see The World's End in theaters. That moment when the guy's head comes off and BLUE STUFF COMES OUT,,,,, I absolutely lost my whole fuckin mind
Dammit, I've reached the end of the VFX Reacts playlist. Just discovered this and sad that I can't sit and watch episodes for hours now. :( Guess I'll just re-watch them all and add subtitles! Haha! Proud subscriber since watching episode 2 of this series last week ^_^
Yes!! Practically every scene has some mind boggling special effect, and I would love to see a breakdown of the entire movie. The scenes that break my mind the most are the spacewalk scenes, because the actors genuinely look like they are floating in zero gravity!!
I think an episode on Korean cinema would be interesting. Movies like “The Host” or “train to busan” have some really interesting practical and digital effects.
The thing that impresses me most about 2001 is the Dawn of Man section being shot ON A SOUND STAGE! You've done the archive insertion from Forrest Gump, but I reckon you should look at Zelig (1983).
![ปฏิเสธไม่ไหว (Crush on you) - LIPTA feat. No One Else [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NBw1jF342vw/mqdefault.jpg)
![30 ชั่วโมงคนเดียว บนรถไฟชั้น 3 โซเวียต [Around The World Ep. 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MlE9boAVqDA/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for watching er'body! If you want to watch this entire show from the beginning you can do that here ►
th-cam.com/video/_4WrKeoeZhk/w-d-xo.html
I think more impressive than any of the effects was Wrens ability to point out the actor for Xerxes
That shit was borderline uncanny, lol.
Wren doesn't see skin color
He's better than all of us
and i only just realised that he played hector from westworld. or am i going insane?
@@viridianrazor You're absolutely right. I think the 1st time I saw him on screen was in Love Actually, I never realised he was Xerxes!
Not if he has seen how Rodrigo Santoro usually looks like, and the chances are, he has watched the "300" behind the scenes, as well as interviews with the cast.
The Floating Pen in 2001 was so memorable that in the sequel 2010 they had another scene with a floating pen, but, they couldn't get it to stick to glass reliably and ended up compositing in a pen in post.
The floating pen always bothered me because its path through the cabin space is so clearly circular around a center point, unlike in reality where it would float linearly. The pen could spin on axis but that isn’t what we see and it just hurts because they could have put the pen in the center of the disc and moved the whole sheet in one direction and it would look even more amazing and accurate.
It was still a pure piece of magic for 1968 and an iconic scene. The attention to detail of Floyd’s hand floating in space does look so eerily realistic and the care the stewardess uses in going down the cabin like she’s only steady because of her Velcro shoes and hands... purely beautiful.
@@CharlieQuartz When seen in the theater if you look closely when the stewardess takes the pen there is a small smudge of glue just barely visible on the glass.
*Float safe*
@@Lethgar_Smith I have the blu ray version, you can see the glass in that as well
Lethgar Smith not only that. You can see smudges at the top of the glass reflecting some light as it rotates.
I never realized Charlie’s Angels was actually a Bollywood action movie.
I thought it was a Bollywood film in the intro
many bollywood movies are just hollywood movies twenty years ago
@@Patrix8558 many bollywood movies are just animé
Better then the last reboot.
Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle like Niko, is my favorite guilty pleasure movie. It’s fuckin fantastic
You're right - 2001 deserves its own "VFX Artists React..." episode.
Literally searched corridor crew Kubrick to find this video.
CinemaTyler did a pretty much unbeatable series on the production of 2001. It details more than just the effects, but you can find the parts you want pretty easily. Highly recommend watching the whole thing.
Episode one: th-cam.com/video/AgNyCluIRhA/w-d-xo.html
I loved this episode. You can tell Clint has so much love for 2001. His passion is admirable.
I can’t wait for their TENET inverted shots analysis.
That would be epic
Legit thought the same thing as I was watching.
You speak my mind
Me seeing Tenet trailer: oh my god.... Can't wait for vfx reacts before I watch the movie
Yh
I literally just watched 2001 yesterday, and was in awe and disbelief that how did Kubrick pull off that kinda vfx in 1968! Thank you so much. After all the explanations, it's even more mind boggling. Kubrick was a genius!
True fact, Stanley Kubrick had an IQ of 200
now imagine watching it in theaters in 1968. :)
Legit watched it a few days ago lol
2001 was such a momentous work even a half a CENTURY later it's still mesmerizing.
It’s the greatest film ever
@@xcvsumextra indeed
Not only did he recognize that Rodrigo Santoro was Xerxes, but that guy was so unrecognizable as Xerxes that he was cast in the sequel as a completely different character. Also Westworld
And he was buried alive in Lost lol
He was also in love actually and played Jesus in the Ben Hur remake.
@@knockitoffhudson3470 jesus is in the ben hur story?
@@bigstunna2049
Were in the original.
they made the dude grey so yeah lol no one's gonna recognize him
Please do:
"Alien Covenant" - Michael Fassbender playing a flute with himself
and:
"Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" - the scene when he tries to fill the shell with water. I don't know if it was a difficult effect to make, but it tricks my mind in such a weird way, I'm always transfixed while watching it.
Good suggestions - I remember watching Prince in the theatre and that scene gave me the chills... It was so eerie. Then of course, the inferi come and it goes to another level.
Plot twist, it was actual magic.
Why does "playing a flute with himself" sound so much like a euphemism?
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
Skin flute?
When I saw you were gonna talk about 2001: Space Odyssey I was like: "YEEEEEEEEEEEEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Thank you, and keep bringing it up!
That film has some of the best visual effects in the industry handsdown
No cap, what a movie ❤️
︎
It's both incredible and also kind of sad that after all these decades 2001 still stands up so well. I only saw it a few years ago and was blown away by it and I genuinely believe that wasn't just because of how long ago it was made. Keep up the great work guys. Peace.
Combination of a director willing to experiment, and get things right.
@@nikkoa.3639 And also have a great producer and studio
Pirates of the Caribbean 1: Jack Sparrow vs Barbossa sword fight
It'd also be cool if they looked at the initial pirates reveal, with the pirates working the ship as the camera pans. I think it might be one continuous shot, but I might be misremembering it.
"Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
And the ship of skeletons
@@zexus480 Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
Dead man's chest: the whole fight one the water wheel thing
You guys should definitely react to the cgi in Disney’s “Dinosaur” from 2000. They have a really interesting mix of practical sets and effects with the dinosaurs obviously being entirely cg. Especially the scene when they’re running from the meteor towards the beginning. You can tell it’s a practical miniature with real explosions but they have the cg dinosaur comped in and it’s really interesting. I’d love to see it in a future video. It was one of my favorite films as a kid and I’m just now rewatching it on Disney+ because nostalgia.
Noah Levy I loved that movie!
Ah I suggested that on their last video! Yes!! I NEED them to review this movie!!! 🙏😭😭😭
This needs to be signal boosted
@Daniel Cosme Shouldn't have touched that link
@@L16htW4rr10r curiosity killed the cat
can you guys react to the Never Ending Story? I've always wondered how they did some of their effects, like the clouds/storms.
Ink in water I think. They did a similar effect in the old Monkey Magic series.
On board with this
A lot of poop smearing I reckon
BEST SFX AND CGI EVER. Lol it’s so bad, but so good!
Their puppetry and blend of miniatures was quite good
Harry potter prisoner of azkaban : Boggart introduction scene. The camera goes through the mirror seamlessly. I really like that scene and would like your take on it.
Kartik Tiwari that kind of transition was already talked about in one of the early vfx artists react
Yes TWICE
@@jonathanfoster4202 episode?
@@dwsel episode what
@@jonathanfoster4202 what "VFX Artists React..." episode number?
Guys... look at that neck.
That neck
mhmm yes neck
HUARGG
*gaggs*
👔
Took them 33 episodes to talk about 2001: A Space Odyssey (the father of all VFX films)
Yep
Yeah but I kinda wanted to see shriek though
Whats the father of all vfx films supposed to mean lol?
What about Metropolis?
"Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
I just love how finely a lot of the effects in _2001: A Space Odyssey_ have aged. Kubrick was a crazy dude.
Replying to my own garbage for a second here to remind everyone that this movie was filmed in 1968.
Remember the special effects from most projects back then? Star Trek, a television show that was almost always under-budget, still looked halfway _decent_ most of the time when it came to the space scenes (specifically), but this movie just straight-up changed the game.
_2001: A Space Odyssey_ wasn't just ahead of its time, it was ahead of films that would come out almost 20 years later. That's completely bananas.
Stanley Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he actually invented a wormhole generator and sent an astronaut through it to obtain that footage. The astronaut's dead now, but still...great, great movie.
Please react to Pirates of the Caribbean: Jack Sparrow vs Davy Jones sword fight scene on Flying Dutchman.
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
I’ve been wanting this for ages!
Lol
Or react to the entire tretrology
I would absolutely love a full video on 2001: A Space Odyssey
Corridor: “Turn your settings to 4k”
Checks settings: 480p
Me: “Yep, that tracks”
and Im here with crappy wifi and 144p :(
Me: „watching it on tiny smartphone screen with 3g connection”
And we all have those 29" 4k phones too...with unlimited data plans right? 🤣
*watches 1080p... on 43" 4K*
*heavy sigh*
@@cy-one same here, still 1080p (((
I love how you showed Tom Scott’s most embarrassing moment as an example of pulling high gs
I've always thought that The World's End and Scott Pilgrim have some of the most impressive CGI I've ever seen. It's so seamless that you genuinely don't know what was done practically and what was CG, and all the effects hold up so perfectly. It's incredible.
Edgar Wright is just such an epic director.. hot fuzz is one of my all time favourite films. Man i wish they could get him on
"So flip that setting to 4K and hit the pause button to let it buffer, coz we're about to jump in" that was real smooth 👍
Then I went to do that, but they do not upload it in 4K.
@@MC-ew7sc Notice they were on the Corridor site there, not here. It was a subtle plug to try to get people to go over there, if you didn't notice that, lol.
Deathbrewer Ah damn. Didn’t realize they had a site, but that makes sense. Sadly I can’t watch it in 4K on my iPad and I’d much rather watch it on my TV in 4K, but I don’t see a way to cast or share it. Do you know if there’s a way to do that?
MrJagermeister it’s possible to buy a cable that hooks up hdmi to the iPad, depends on the tv but you can use Bluetooth, I’d suggest googling how to do it with your specific tv
You guys should talk about the VFX in the Nolan Batman Trilogy, specifically the Bat swarms in Batman Begins
"Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
You should do the skeletons from Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl next.
I watched the movie a couple days ago and I think the VFX is pretty solid.
For the most part, yes. There are a few CG shots in the movie that look a little wonky and goofy here and there.
But for me, the most incredible effect of that movie was that out of the film's 600 VFX shots, I think a quarter or almost half of those shots were used to digitally paint out modern sail boats from the backgrounds.
I'm being serious.
Charlie's Angels looks like a Bollywood movie in disguise.
I do have a question. What do u think of Bollywood as?
I don't think it's meant to be taken seriously at all.... it's deliberately done in a silly way to appeal to that humor, I think.
@@animatorFan74 true
Nah it’s just 2003
It looks like Spy Kids on a sort of larger budget
I feel like The World's End deserves a stuntmen react, it is such an underrated movie with amazing action sequences.
Agreed though it was the weakest out of shaun of the dead and hot fuzz, but best action scenes.
They were Jackie Chan's stunt team, right??
Edit: I got to that point. 10:33
Sione Tupou the weakest? It’s the best one!
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
I’m so glad they did a “look at that neck” callback I wasn’t sure but I thought I was the only one who remembered how funny that was
13:00 That's Rodrigo Santoro for you... He also doenst age
Rodrigão needs more recognition
I know him from Bicho de sete cabeças
Just like John stamos 😂
1:20
Pq os BR tão falando em inglês com outros BR sobre o Rodrigão??? Kakakakska Rodrigão é o Dicaprio brazuka
-> The set was 38 feet (12 m) in diameter.
-> the target g-force need to jog proberly without constantly loosing traction should be somewhere between the 0.38 on mars and the 1.0 on earth. Let's pick 0.6 g for now.
Now using SpinCalc, an an artificial-gravity calculator, this would mean the angular velocity (this is the spin rate) would be 9.45 rotations/minute or 1 rotation every 6.3 seconds!
*According to SpinCalc this would mean the value is too high for comfort since your tangential velocity would be over 13 miles per hour. It instead recommends a diameter of about at least 130 feet (40m) to reach the comfort zone, where little or no adaptation would be needed.*
you can play around with these numbers over at -> artificial-gravity dot com/sw/SpinCalc/
According to that site your original number are in a range where it might work after a lengthy adaptation and I don't think that would necessarily be a completely blocker for a mission like this if say cost goes up sufficiently quickly with size!
And that's with your 0.6g requirement which might be much too high.. or not! The available rotational data is at best "conflicting" but at least we have some, for gravity requirement we pretty much have NO data beyond "0g is bad long-term, 1g is fine". But in the movie they have rotational infrastructure in space and moon bases so they should have much better idea on the safe range.
If the required gravity is 0.46g or less this brings the rotation into a range where all parameter is into "some sources think at least some people would be fine without lengthy adaptation", and for this mission we can assume both careful selection of persons for rotational tolerance and a long adaptation period!
We also don't know if they planned to rotate the wheel at the same speed at the destination so it's possible only the two pilots are ultra-hardy and carefully adapted and the mission is planned with say half the gravity while the scientists where awake. I'm not sure I'd be willing to completely rule out even 0.8g in a 12m wheel completely, again, not enough data.
OTOH, some sources claim it's supposed to be rotating at 3 mph which leads to 0.015g at 12m! That we can rule out, he can't possibly run like that in gravity anywhere near that low and increasing the size reduces the gravity even further due to using mph as measurement, without spending time to analyze how he's running I think it's clear it's not micro-gravity at least and I think likely at least double the moons gravity. Without actual analysis I'm not sure if we can rule out say 0.45g.
Your inner ear would be spinning from the Coriolis effect.
@@Torbjorn.Lindgren true, I was taking into account that you can clearly see that he is not getting mad air with every step and has no trouble getting a good grip with every step. You can't run but merely bounce awkwardly on the moon and possibly on Mars too. That's why I picked 0.6 for starters. Good addition!
No one ever talks about The Worlds End!! Lmao I love that movie
Yess and theres one similer to it but i cant remember 😥
@@unreal2236 Cornetto Trilogy wise or just plot?
prolly gonna watch it High this weekend
@@unreal2236 I think you mean This Is The End? Yeh both those movies came out the same year. The similarities begin and end there. Unfortunately The World's End came out after and its box office was damaged by people thinking they were similar films. Such a shame as The Worlds End is the better movie and is just as good as the previous two entries in the Cornetto Trilogy.
It's cack
How about Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie? There’s so much CGI to go through. PLEASE.
i know it's shitty advertising on the comment section
but can you please give some advice on this..
th-cam.com/video/UkomO3rUWi4/w-d-xo.html
Hell the original movie Zord fight would be hilarious
dude the soundtrack for turbo though
Not a fan of power rangers dont make fun of me I only saw the pilot episode of mmpr and hated it when I was 9 in 1993 the mmpr movie didn't understand it when I was 12 in 1996 on fox and the sequel on fox too in 1998 i Didn't understand that film either i would agree with you about the effects though🤯
Turbo didn't have much in the way of CGI. Especially when it came to the mecha stuff. That was all miniantures for the combination sequence and a dude in a suit for the mecha fight itself. The 1995 Power Rangers movie had a load of CGI though. That's the one that really looks bad. There's a shot of the cockpit and the camera zooms out to outside the mecha and as it does that the aspect ratio of the rangers in the cockpit changes mid zoom.
The Third Impact scene in Evangelion would be cool.
That would be awesome
underated comment
That Anime also needs a Psychological expert to break down after he is off his meds lol
@@Banidil i just don't even wanna know what it means , could be either too dark or too stupid.....i think too stupid.....
Obviously a practical effect. They used tons of fantas to achieve that fanta sea shot
I’ve been requesting G.I. JOE and this wasn’t the scene I had in mind, but at the same time I was not disappointed with this reaction😂
i think i got used to clint with a beard. he looks kinda weird clean shaven.
Jesus, i wasn't looking at the beginning, just reading comments and so i scrolled back to the video... 😣
What's weirder is that Wren no longer has his Bob Ross hair
He kinda looks like linus(when he was without the beard)
He looks like a high school kid from the 80's😂😂
So that’s what I was thinking - something’s different but idk what.
“Metropolis” You really need to take a look at it. They did some pretty insane effects in 1927.
There's a shot in Tim Burton's Sleepy Hollow that still holds up pretty well.
At the end of the movie when the horseman gets thrown his head back. Pretty good skin/flesh restructuring cgi for 1999.
You guys should react “The Host”. It’s by the same director who did “Parasite”
You mean 'bong joon ho'
ya that’s him i just forgot his name
Not the one from the writer of Twilight.
That's a great film.
A really great monster movie, thanks for suggesting that - gotta watch it again
Very insightful as always! Keep up the wonderful work! Would love for u guys to react to the vfx we did in my recent Rock Video :)
Omg
Hey James! How’s it going?
original, 😲
Woooh.. James not expecting to see you here.
Me: (Sees an effect)
That's pretty cool.
Corridor: Laugh uncontrollably and say what's wrong with it.
Me: Mmm, yeah, I agree.
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
The Kubrick stuff was so good!
We need more old school cool effects like those
Ray harryhausen stuff is always fun
Screw coffee, I want whatever Wren takes in the morning
He's actually a human battery. Which is very convenient for onewheeling.
7:55 That fella over Niko's shoulder is pretty shocked it took so long too...
I spotted him too 😁
I just realized God-King Xerxes is Hector from Westworld.
Yes... Rodrigo Santoro.
I just realized , you know how to use imdb cast&crew.
Yeah, he was in some episodes of Lost too, he have plenty of movies.
@@rafaelalodio5116 he was good in brazilian tv-shows
@@blacklight4720 What? I just recognized him.
Fun fact : Charlie's Angels movie not directed by Bollywood director........
you guys should react to "District 9"!
It's a SUPER fantastic movie that looks fantastic for being made about 11 years ago
Excellent suggestion, I second that!
Thirded...ed. Great film.
It looks better and IS better than most movie nowadays.
Just thinking about that! Love that movie
Charlie's Angels were my favorite movies as a kid.
Also Clint look Sharp AF with a clean shave
You should look at Speed Racer 2008, the effects in that film are kinda unlike anything ive seen since
Yes agree!!!
*"2001 A Space Odyssey" is a masterpiece, and not just for the FX, but also for the story and the symbolism behind the lines*
So is the last jedi.
@@franchisefanatic4142 xd
They should do an entire video on 2001's VFX.
It's blowing minds to this day. Kubrick was away ahead of his time. And probably ahead of our time too.
@@franchisefanatic4142 Hahahaha good one.
Wren is spot on. Last time I went to outer space and ran on the sides of a rapidly rotating room my inner ear was very wonky.
There are actually at least two American astronauts who actually did that back in the or 70s and filmed it.
Niko: "This is Charles Angels: Full Throttle"
Editors: "Niko's Guilty Pleasure"
Same tho
@@WhiteWaterAlchemist same
I mean they really only brought hit up because Pastrana recently covered that exact sequence in a technique critique video.
I’m glad you acknowledged that sometimes we are forced to do something we know looks bad and wrong! 😂😭
"Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
FLOOR GANG!!! OHHH
What are you, 7?
@@superfire6463 nah, im a TH-camr
Corridor and JD, hat a weird crossover XD
@@RandomThoughts420 "Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
"Beardless Clint can't hurt you, he's not real"" Beardless Clint-
Clint and Wren switched spots, which has literally zero effect on the episode but just feels so off after all this time
I'm obsessed with you guys. Thanks for showing one of my favorite movies of all time, Space Odyssey, so beautifully made. Would love to see more.
"This took 2 hours, for every second of footage."
Guy in the background O.O
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
Hahaha, I didn't even notice him.
Lmao
@@jousefomar3075 no
VFX Artists React to Charlie's Angels: laughs hysterically for 3 minutes
who wonders 😂
Yup , the effects on that movie is awful besides how ridiculous are the majority of the scenes
I'd put Charlie's Angels into the bad writing category like GI Joe. Like, no girl you can't dodge bullets by flipping around.
Wait it’s all green screen?
Always has been
So deep😂
*S h u t .*
@@mcchickenbaptistchurch.org2 That dog from halo
Oh Rodrigo Santoro, the best underapreciated gift Brazil gave to the world
some more vfx react ideas!!
- “away” on Netflix
- the umbrella academy
- lucifer (s1 compared to s4 & s5)
- the 100
I really want them to do umbrella academy. Might be hard to do without spoilers but could be very good.
The 100 seems super cool
Young Shia Lebeouf: *Exists*
Them: We're about to end this man's whole career
YOU! WHAT! HOW ARE YOU HERE! XDDDDDDD
Long time no see! :D
I expected him to have a younger voice
You watch these guys?
Still waiting for a comment from Chris Hadfield to validate Wren...
"Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
If you're talking about where Wren says that you would get nauseous or dizzy inside of a Von Braun Rotating Space Station, then no you wouldn't because you need gravity in order to affect your inner ear, without it your body doesnt feel the constant pull in one direction while your body changes orientation. There are videos of Astronauts in the I.S.S. where one will tuck into a ball while the other spins them both vertically and horizontally and they cant even tell.
Now they do say that you might feel something if your eyes are open and you're spinning that fast. But jogging in a giant wheel would be fine.
Thank you guys for the great and fun content you constantly provide! As for other material to react to, the Amazon Prime tv show "The Boys" has lots of, what I think, great VFX effects. Cheers!
Wren: It’s all green screen
Niko: *behind him* “always has been
"Kung fury" has some interesting CGI.. and I am also impressed by the video clip of the song "stylo" by gorillaz
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle is a feverdream on crack
One of the few films I can call a legit guilty pleasure.
I think there are a few things that need to be considered. Firstly, the rotating spaceship isn't also fighting the pull of gravity in another direction like the fairground ride. Secondly, they aren't necessarily trying to simulate full Earth gravity in a spaceship anymore that it's necessary to provide full sea level atmospheric pressure, so the rate of rotation may not be as extreme as you imagine it to be. Also, a midway ride doesn't give you any time to acclimate or adjust to the effect like an extended space voyage would, kind of like getting your sea legs on a ship.
Wren : Explains about the side effects of G force on a human body!
Niko : Why are you looking at us?😂
The same which happens in schools while taking seminars and that one guy explains everything! 😂
Capital G is constant of gravitation. What you want to say is g, which is acceleration due to gravity.😅
@@a1rboy.745 Nobody cares🙂
d3strow nono, they do😑😑
Bless Corridor Crew for giving us 33 of these to keep us company in covid
i know it's shitty advertising on the comment section
but can you please give some advice on this..
th-cam.com/video/UkomO3rUWi4/w-d-xo.html
@C U NEXT TUESDAY Doin your mom
Clint without a beard...? It was all just green screen...
Always has been
Niko's reaction to the smoke under water is gold 😂
I absolutely love how ridiculous the Charlie's Angels movie are. They are so much fun!
“It took 10 minutes to expose one frame”
3d artists: that’s an average amount of time to render a frame.
I can vouch for that from experience
Sure, but you're paying a unionized staff of cameraman and lighting techs and whoever moves the painted frame (grips?) in the background the whole time. The rendering may need babysitting, but not to the same degree.
But this wasn't something you just leave and go to bed.
It's an intricate mechanical device that needed to be watched over and fiddled with after every frame.
@@SierraSierraFoxtrot 1985. Apple //e animation. Started it and went to bed.
th-cam.com/video/lSUkpcZi88g/w-d-xo.html
I saw the 2001:space Odyssey shot in the thumbnail and I was like
_" Finally!!!!!!!!!!!......"_
"Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
We actually studied 2001 in my physics class: that ring is pretty big, and it's rotating to give just under 1 g. The reason being that because gravity is radial, everything is "pulled" out, not necessarily down, and it would mess with your brain too much.
Mir in Armageddon, on the other hand, would have almost a full g difference between your feet and your head, and would be spinning at 3 Hz.
The '70s Doctor Who intro was also a slit scan. I love those old analog effects
Well worth mentioning, thank you!
The earliest Doctor Who intros were a form of video feedback, pointing the camera at the screen it's hooked up to. It's called howlround in Britain. There's a nice TH-cam video that talks about the various Doctor Who intro effects and goes into some detail on the slit scan intro.
th-cam.com/video/ylyXb-ZDnnA/w-d-xo.html
You guys got to do more 2001! There is so much wizardry in the special effects of that movie, so many scenes that I have no idea how they did
You guys should react to the Torus scene from Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation
Awwww Wren, I love your absolutely over-the-top excitement... or should I say: Showmanship. :)
“Look at that nECk” 😆 this really is an og VFX artists react
2001: A Space Odyssey effects - awesome stuff! That film could encompass entire film schools of study. I love seeing some feedback on older films.
Most of 2001's effects shots took ages 'cos they wanted a decent depth of field.
Amazing
Here’s one I recently came across:
Captain America: The Winter Soldier
Peggy Carter VFX aging.
The movement of her skin while she’s talking around her neck and face looks like a CGI layer but it’s doesn’t move like skin should. There’s some articles online talking about the process of how much practical make-up they used vs VFX. For 2014 however, I think it falls pretty short of Marvel quality. Other than that, spectacularly film!
Why was that guy Motocrossing while carrying TNT on his person?! Why Moto Dude, WHY?!
Pee-Pee!" - Wren 2020
I'm glad to see you guys end all your takes the same way I do 😂😂
“Let’s go back to 2001”
**posted on 9/12**
That's not just an "oof" moment, but a "mega-oof" moment.
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
I still remember that day in 2013 when I went to see The World's End in theaters. That moment when the guy's head comes off and BLUE STUFF COMES OUT,,,,, I absolutely lost my whole fuckin mind
The entire theater did man. That was unexpected and awesome.
First watch was crazy. That level of escalation
So did he
Heroes Season 1, Episode 17 "Company Man" - Claire's regeneration scene after the blast - This is CGi comedy gold
The Hobbit, battle of the five armies, Legolas doing his Super Mario jumps.
YES!!
The Hobbit, battle of the five armies, Legolas doing his Super Mario jumps.
That part was cool as heckkk
Gravity doesnt affect elves like men. Legolas was able to walk on snow without sinking after all. It's purely attention to lore.
Can confirm it makes you sick but you get used to it. Sincerely, Dan from the year 2030.
Did they CG Clint's face?
I'm getting some uncanny valley effect here!
I think it's because he Shaved.
he's giving me handsome squidward vibes
th-cam.com/video/qeMERYTlHc4/w-d-xo.html
@@spudrina he looks like *EUSTACE* , my owner.
Dammit, I've reached the end of the VFX Reacts playlist. Just discovered this and sad that I can't sit and watch episodes for hours now. :( Guess I'll just re-watch them all and add subtitles! Haha! Proud subscriber since watching episode 2 of this series last week ^_^
They should do a full video for «2001», reacting to the most advanced and popular scenes, whould be really cool. :)
What do you think?
Yes!! Practically every scene has some mind boggling special effect, and I would love to see a breakdown of the entire movie. The scenes that break my mind the most are the spacewalk scenes, because the actors genuinely look like they are floating in zero gravity!!
7:55 You guys really impressed the dude on the back 😂
I think an episode on Korean cinema would be interesting. Movies like “The Host” or “train to busan” have some really interesting practical and digital effects.
I think they already looked at The Host if I remember right.
The thing that impresses me most about 2001 is the Dawn of Man section being shot ON A SOUND STAGE!
You've done the archive insertion from Forrest Gump, but I reckon you should look at Zelig (1983).