Gautam Bhatia's Lecture Series On Landmark Cases Of Supreme Court [1] AK Gopalan Vs State Of Madras

Gautam Bhatia's Lecture Series On Landmark Cases Of Supreme Court | AK Gopalan Vs State Of Madras
LiveLaw will redefine standards of legal journalism in the country and will strive to bring in more transparency in the legal eco system.
We bring you the latest legal news and updates from across India and beyond.
Stay updated. Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/2pskgB3
Support Us: bit.ly/35qFj6A
Visit Our Website: www.livelaw.in
Facebook: livelawindia
Twitter: livelawindia
Instagram: livelaw.in
Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
Android: bit.ly/2toaimp
iOS: apple.co/39dQ0vh

[@rajendrajadhao2204]

Great analysis. Rightly said that the exceptions are being treated as norms.

[@ShivamSharma-ve4dy]

Loved it! Thank you so much for this.

[@ruhikhan8477]

outstanding analysis of the judgement... definitely it's easy to lay down the grand principles of constitution.equality liberty and fraternity and fail to comply them.
sir your concept on consti. and way of expression is admirable as ever...though having some differences eagerly waiting for next lecture.

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Excellent Articulation on A.K.Gopalan Case. Thank you very much .

[@niranjanswain2229]

Illustration of the cases are really illustrious. Thank u Sri Bhatia Ji

[@Priyanaik1983]

Very insightful. Thank you.

[@sujithnair2552]

Splendid....absolutely splendid.... couldnt thank you enough.... eagerly waiting for the 2nd lecture.

[@tanveer1231001]

Thank You so much Live Law for providing such wonderful lecture.

[@theslypotato8672]

Thank you so much for this.

[@niranjanswain2229]

I am expressing my solidar with Sri Bhushan.Now it has been feltis that the freedom of speech and it's area has been synchronised .And there would be conflict in fundamental right to expression with the contempts of courts act.I think ,the issue of dissent should be widely accepted .

[@kishoretejaswi1948]

Thanks, Gautam. You are more a scholar than a lawyer :)

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Excellent And Enriching informative lecture. Thank you very much.

[@lalitwalia1997]

Thank you so much.

[@nagendrakrishnakumarbudida964]

Good lecture.

[@143srishti]

Thanks for this lecture.

[@dkumar7810]

On the 15th of August 1947 we got ' Independence ' but not ' Freedom ' . The nation missed the opportunity to uphold & establish the supremacy of the latter in Gopalan's case .

[@user-rm1zx2mt4r]

நன்றிகள் பல.... 🌹

[@premamanayath3063]

Really outstanding analysis

[@adityashukla3653]

Thanks for special series

[@mohsinahmed789]

"Liberty in general phrase and abrogation of liberty in marginal note".as we celebrated the independence day today but the question lingers in my mind, do we really got the independence?

[@premamanayath3063]

Great lecture sir

[@MrSahdevsingh]

Dears good afternoon...
Nice session

[@satyapanigrahi4654]

Excellent explanation...live law should keep it up....

[@jitendrapandey4231]

None is above the law.

[@MrSahdevsingh]

Nice lecture

[@chitranshulsinha4201]

I thought it was a lecture by Gautam Gambhir

[@rhaegar2138]

Glad he got a haircut finally. Saxxy lag Raha hai Gauti

[@ParvezKhan-rb8gp]

👌👌👌👌👌

[@vvnn2633]

👍👍👍 We all express our support for him

[@deepasaini5379]

Superbb lecture for the knowldge purpose👌👌👌... And no solidarity at all for Mr. Bhushan. Freedom comes wid certain resposiblity and it is vry much needeed to make him realise his resposiblities...🎉🎉🎉

[@rahul18kv]

I love this man.😊

[@akshaytarfe]

Maybe keep the phone away from the mic next time.

[@amitpurohit630]

I would have afforded solidarity to the Contemnor over the controversial tweets, had this not been Mr. Prashant Bhushan. In my view, while dealing with the contemnor, the motive of the contemnor is of paramount importance and its well known, Mr. Bhushan always try to criticise the institution in a well informed manner with the intrinsic objective of maligning the Judiciary and to deter Judges by showing the armour of fundamental right of speech and expression. This type of motive is anathema to independence of Judiciary. I severly criticize it.

[@yuvrajsingh9071]

Sir app hindi m bhi samja sakte ho kya

[@AamilSyed]

This is a good talk and shows yet again how hard Babasaheb Ambedkar fought to keep the constitution pro-people and how it has been twisted by the brahminical judiciary to serve the interests of the brahminical empire of India.

[@rakshityadav6563]

@Aamil Syed. So you see India as a Brahminical Empire, do you ?

[@AamilSyed]

@@rakshityadav6563 yes

[@rakshityadav6563]

Prashant Bhushan cheered when people with whom he disagreed were punished for contempt of court. Judges may be ideologically inclined, we don't know but rumors can be very dangerous. It will be better if Judges were appointed for life to remove any political partisanship, provided that the executive is given full powers of making such appointment according to ideological inclinations. This will ensure that judiciary to be in line with the popular ideological conscience as well as prevent the judiciary from being political partisanship.

[@rajendrajadhao2204]

In particular P Bhushan cheered when Justice Karnan was jailed without giving him chance of being heard. Double standards based on caste as usual. Justice is only for safeguarding the interests of uppercaste.

[@saurabhshankarsrivastava2445]

Good content. Should have a better speaker.

[@lakshaylawliveclasses8624]

Sir pls hindi mai bhi lecturer de

[@lawyerkothari]

Prashant Bhushan deserves this why are u favouring the nonsense fellow

[@helcurt2509]

Too long, make it shorter. Around 15 mins max

[@harshavrao4619]

watch it in 1.5 speed.

[@chandnijain6178]

@@harshavrao4619😊 i too did the same