What a wonderful father Karen Read has. He stands by his daughter and attends all hearings. Whether guilty or not, Karen is truly blessed with a loving father who stands by her.
Both sides argued well. In my opinion the judge was at fault. She rushed them out. All she needed to say is are you deadlocked on all counts? That would have confirmed yes or no. I think her instuuctions were deliberately confusing.
I’ve never seen a case in which the judge asked that or in which the jury was polled when they didn’t return a verdict. But also confusing isn’t grounds for appeal necessarily. You’d have to prove that the instructions were intentionally confusing or misleading. But if the jury didn’t understand them that’s not grounds for appeal.
Karen Read will spend all her parents retirement money, nice parents but she is a grown up woman, to me seems immature to involve elderly parents hmmmmm
@@edvincentWhat evidence is there she killed him. The medical examiner said she couldn’t say for certain that he was struck by a vehicle that is reasonable doubt which equals acquittal
Dammit. I followed this case for a month only to be let down without a verdict. Felt like when my Bears lost the double doink playoff game to the Eagles. I wont waste any more time on this circus.🤡
#CourtTV Catch up on the case against #KarenRead in the #KillerOrCoverUpMurderTrial.
MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/tag/karen-read/?
What a wonderful father Karen Read has. He stands by his daughter and attends all hearings. Whether guilty or not, Karen is truly blessed with a loving father who stands by her.
You'll get to hear his testimony in the second trial.
I mean dont u see her Mother there smdh....shes there everyday also but any parent would stand behind their kid that dont make them not guilty
@@edvincent Looking forward to his testimony.
that judge is as biased as aunt bev was
So she's not biased. Got it! Perfect example 👍
Both sides argued well. In my opinion the judge was at fault. She rushed them out.
All she needed to say is are you deadlocked on all counts? That would have confirmed yes or no. I think her instuuctions were deliberately confusing.
As the appellate justices clearly stated, the defense had their chance and didn't say a word. That's not the judge's fault.
Judge failed
I’ve never seen a case in which the judge asked that or in which the jury was polled when they didn’t return a verdict. But also confusing isn’t grounds for appeal necessarily. You’d have to prove that the instructions were intentionally confusing or misleading. But if the jury didn’t understand them that’s not grounds for appeal.
Karen Read will spend all her parents retirement money, nice parents but she is a grown up woman, to me seems immature to involve elderly parents hmmmmm
She's innocent
Real, actual evidence says otherwise. This second trial will remove the dog n pony show of DY and AJ. Wait, watch, learn.
They're so hung up in process, the fact that a womans life is on the line and the justice around that fact is getting lost.
The fact that the "women's life" is the person who killed John and took a father away from two kids. But you don't care about that.
@@edvincentWhat evidence is there she killed him. The medical examiner said she couldn’t say for certain that he was struck by a vehicle that is reasonable doubt which equals acquittal
Killer Karen is going to spend years in prison and face financial ruin. It's called karma...it's coming.
Ineffective
Dammit. I followed this case for a month only to be let down without a verdict. Felt like when my Bears lost the double doink playoff game to the Eagles. I wont waste any more time on this circus.🤡
Yeah imagine how the jury felt, they were there for nearly 10 weeks…all for nothing.
She's wearing a white suit!!! Lol! Shes such a phony!!
It’s after labor day! No white😆
Hey leave killer Karen alone! She has years of prison and multiple lawsuits to pay for. 🤣