@Linda Godfrey, actually, owls are not birds of prey, the term "bird of prey" only applies to all species within the order Falconiformes, which is a large and diverse order of birds being divided into nine extant families, which are Cariamidae (Seriemas), Sagittariidae (Secretarybird and Fossil Relatives), Aquilidae (Eagles), Accipitridae (Hawks, Buzzards, Kites, and Harriers), Pandionidae (Ospreys and Fossil Relatives), Aegypiidae (Old World Vultures), Caracaridae (Caracaras), Falconidae (Falcons, Kestrels, Hobbies, and Falconets), and Cathartidae (New World Vultures), there are also extinct families of birds of prey like the well known brontornithids (family Brontornithidae), the dromornithids (family Dromornithidae), the gastornithids (family Gastornithidae), the terror birds (family Phorusrhacidae), and the teratorns (family Teratornithidae), owls are their own independent order (Strigiformes), birds of prey (order Falconiformes) are more closely related to fowl (clade Galloanserae), while the closest living relatives of the owls (order Strigiformes) are the swifts and hummingbirds (order Apodiformes).
I didn't know primates were such an old order of mammals, that explains why we and the other primates are so different when compared to the other members of this order.
@@whatabouttheearth next time you see a lizard or a frog, look at their arms and hands. Look familiar? Honey, we’re basic. Compared to hoofs, flippers, elephant trunks, even cat’s paws are more evolved and divergent.
we primates are an intelligent group though it's only us humans that were able to build civilization and enacted the course of history we see in historical media.
@@clod8 Yeah, I never noticed how basal our hands are, when compared to hooves and paws. Although I do think fingernails are a deviation from the more common claws in other land vertebrates.
@@Minish4rk360 you are correct. I saw this comment before finishing the video, and the video calls them simply "shrews" at one point so I understand the confusion
@BeastMaster09, actually, the closest living relatives of the primates are actually the dermopterans, which would be the colugos (family Cynocephalidae) and their extinct relatives, with the treeshrews (order Scandentia) being the second closest to the primates, while the closest living relatives of the rodents (order Rodentia) are the lagomorphs (order Lagomorpha).
Good video, two things I'd like to point out. 1- The earliest primates were not frugivores, rather they were insectivores. Forward facing eyes and grasping opposable digits are traits of certain predator lineages that have evolved several times in distantly related groups. Large canine teeth are not needed for eating fruit, but are useful for munching bugs, lizards, and rodents. Not to mention increased brain size. 2- The new world monkeys did not raft to South America. They migrated there using Antarctica as a land bridge which connected South America and Africa at the time (which was periodically separated by water much in the same way that the Bering strait functioned for things like hyaenodonts, felids, canids, beardogs, hyenas, etc). This land bridge was also crossed by the ancestors of South America's rodents, litopterns, sloths, armadillos, anteaters, marsupials, etc.
I think you mixed up the land bridge part. Antarctica for a long time was a land bridge between South America and Australia, and that's how the marsupials reached Australia. Litopterns, sloths, armadillos and anteaters evolved in South America and never reached other continents. But there was no land bridge between Africa and Antarctica. Africa had broken away much earlier, long before the ancestors of current mammals (with the notable exception of the platypus) diversified. Rodents and primates are thought to have reached South America from Africa by raft over the then smaller Atlantic Ocean, possibly hopping along a now submerged island chain.
@@eljanrimsa5843 I mixed up nothing. The land bridge that was Antarctica connected South America with Africa and Australia. The marsupials outcompeted the placentals completely in Australia until their reintroduction by humans as well as bats on their own. The ancestors of litopterns, sloths, armadillos, and anteaters moved into South America and then diversified, which is exactly what I said, so I don't know why you brought that up. It was a gradual process.
@Eljan Rimsa, actually, not all rodents reached South America from Africa, only cavy-like rodents (suborder Caviomorpha) did, both squirrel-like rodents (suborder Sciuromorpha) and mouse-like rodents (suborder Myomorpha) reached South America from North America, new world monkeys actually reached South America from Southeast Asia, and the ancestors of carnivorans that are in the family Nasuidae family that contains the currently living coatis, olingos, olinguito, and kinkajou reached South America from North America before the Great American Interchange, also, xenarthrans did reach other continents, the only one they did officially reach is North America.
@@eljanrimsa5843 Is there any ancestor of sloth, armadillos, anteaters in Africa? Because as I know those animals is endemic to South America. And furthermore, some experts argue that mammals evolution may have a South America origin due to the simplicity of xenarthrans. Also following tectonic plates movements estimations Africa was already apart from Antarctica in early cretaceous about 120 million ya. Unless those animals existed in that era like rodents to make their own way to Antarctica and then south America, the history must be reviewed.
@@evertonfrancisco9149 I agree. I think that's the current scientific consensus. The only part of early mammal evolution that definitely happened while Africa was still part of Gondwana was the split between Monotremes and the rest (Theria). The split between marsupials (Metatheria) and the rest (Eutheria) happened roughly during the same time frame as Gondwana split up, so that's best left to the experts to figure out what happened where and when exactly. The diversification of Eutheria (Xenarthans, Afrotherians, Boreoeutherians) happened when Africa was already split from the rest. Any exchange at that time couldn't just walk over a land bridge but involved some rafting and island hopping.
I would be sooooo interested in seeing you do one of these on Suina. I think pigs and peccaries are really fascinating animals and I'd love to learn more about their evolution and ancestry. Do you think you might cover that in a future video?
@Nerderific, actually, peccaries are a separate family (Tayassuidae) from pigs (family Suidae), while both families are similar in some characteristics, pigs (family Suidae) and peccaries (family Tayassuidae) are not closely related, they belong to two different superfamilies, pigs (family Suidae) are the only surviving family within the superfamily Suoidea, while peccaries (family Tayassuidae) are the sole surviving family of the superfamily Tayassuoidea.
@@indyreno2933 What I meant to say is Suina. Autocorrect. I didn't catch it I guess. Now it's fixed, though. I'm well aware that peccaries and pigs are very different animal groups.
In fact, there are just two suborders of even-toed hoofed mammals (order Artiodactyla), Neoselenodontia (Herbivorous Even-Toed Hoofed Mammals) with the infraorders Tragulina (Chevrotains and Fossil Relatives), Ceratodonta (Musk Deer, Water Deer, and Fossil Relatives), Tylopoda (Camels and Fossil Relatives), and Pecora (Bovids, Deer, Giraffes, Okapi, and Pronghorn) and Bunodontia (Omnivorous Even-Toed Hoofed Mammals) with the infraorders Hyomorpha/Suina (Pigs, Peccaries, and Fossil Relatives) and Ancodonta (Hippos and Fossil Relatives), while most of the even-toed hoofed mammal superfamilies are monotypic like Traguloidea, Cameloidea, Cervoidea, Bovoidea, Tayassuoidea, Suoidea, and Hippopotamoidea, the only two superfamilies of even-toed hoofed mammals that are polytypic are Moschoidea, which contains two monotypic families being Hydropotidae and Moschidae and Giraffoidea, which contains two extant families being Antilocapridae and Giraffidae.
Actually, the Giraffidae family has a total of nine extant species, being the okapi (Okapia johnstoni), the nigerian giraffe (Giraffa peralta), the kordofan giraffe (Giraffa antiquorum), the nubian giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa reticulata), the masai giraffe (Giraffa tippelskirchi), the thornicroft's giraffe (Giraffa thornicrofti), the angolan giraffe (Giraffa angolensis), and the cape giraffe (Giraffa capensis), for the whole superfamily Giraffoidea, the only living member of its other extant family being Antilocapridae is the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), so it's a total of ten extant members of the whole superfamily Giraffoidea.
A hate the fact that humans aren't brought up when he talking about the apes. Humans are just another species of animal, and we aren't entirely special among life.
@@TheFluffestMango nope just tired of paleontology youtube channels being run by people with no actual education in the field. As well as whole videos being essentially one person reading off of wikipedia
@@Dr.IanPlect oh yeah, smart guy? If my lord is "foul stench" mythology, then how come I haven't made a stinky in my britches since I started going to church? Your "science" has no explanation for that.
Actually, the term "old world monkey" only applies to the superfamily Cercopithecoidea, which consists of three extant families, Cercopithecidae (Swamp Monkeys), Colobidae (Colobuses, Langurs, Snub-Nosed Monkeys, and Proboscis Monkey), and Papionidae (Baboons, Mangabeys, and Macaques).
The problem is that the term monkey doesn’t have a strict scientific meaning being that it’s been used since before evolution was understood. so you’re left with using it to refer to a group that isn’t really an entire group. People should just stop using the word monkey by itself anyway.
@@jaredf6205All monkeys form a monophyletic taxon so long as you allow apes to be monkeys, so I believe "monkey" does have a valid scientific meaning.
It’s such a great video! May I repost your videos to the platform named Ganjing World which is full of clean and valuable videos? I will keep your videos as is for sure. Thank you to let me know!
A person who calls himself an idiot and also knows that he is an idiot is most certainly not an idiot, but rather brilliant. Keep it up like this, it's all very interesting.
Very entertaining video, however at 8:47 you mention the tip of Spain. Would be nice if you mentioned Gibraltar, the non-Spanish territory at the tip of Spain where they actually live, considering none of the monkeys actually live in Spain itself.
You split up new world monkeys way touch there are only two families of new world monkeys and you split up old world monkeys and there's only one family of old world monkeys also galagos and lorises are also in the same family and yet again go back to your redditor cave
I don't think the old world monkeys are commonly theorized to have deliberately crafted over the Atlantic. I'm pretty sure it's meant to have been more of an accidental thing.
Yeah, like a hurricane or something swept a few monkeys out to sea on rafts of debris, they landed on the shores of South America, and boom! New world monkeys.
I was so anxious that you wouldn't mention apes being also monkeys but thankfully you mentioned it around min 9:00 . This weird quirk of the english language to differentiate between monkeys and apes always irked me, because millions of english speaking people think apes and monkeys are totally different things, when in reality all apes are (oldworld) monkeys
@Ollypa, actually, gorillas are not monkeys, they are apes, apes are tailless, while monkeys have tails, members of the infraorder Simiiformes are not called monkeys, they are called anthropoids, anthropoids (infraorder Simiiformes) are divided into two parvorders, Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys) and Catarrhini (Apes and Old World Monkeys), monkeys are a paraphyletic group of anthropoids.
@@indyreno2933 Gorillas are technically both monkeys and apes monophyletically, as they are still a part of the clade Catarhini, which contains all old world monkeys.
@Cerasinopshodgskissi, actually, the word "monkey" only refers to the taxa Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys) and Cercopithecoidea (Old World Monkeys), apes (superfamily Hominoidea) do not count as monkeys because they don't have tails, both monkeys and apes belong to the infraorder Simiiformes, where the correct word is "anthropoid", to include both monkeys and apes, monkeys are a paraphyletic group, while apes are a monophyletic group.
@Indy Reno Isn't Paraphyly based on outdated hypotheses from before the existence of Cladistics? It really should be updated or people will assume that old world monkeys are closer related to new world monkeys than to apes, instead of the truth that is the opposite. Paraphyly have also led to people having different definitions of what a monkey is, some says that all Simians are monkeys other argue whether apes split off before or after Old world monkeys evolved. There are only 2 logical definitions I can think of and both include apes. 1st - If monkeys are called monkeys because they belong to the same clade then apes are also monkeys. 2nd - If monkeys are called monkeys because of their looks than apes (or at least apes ancestors) should be called monkeys. (Old-W-monkeys arguably share more similarities to apes than to New-w-monkeys). The way I see it as, is that all Crow-simians are monkeys since they looked exactly like monkeys and are the last common ancestor to all living monkeys.
small tip: I saw the first thumbnail of this video when it came out, showing the earliest species of monkeys like the one at 0:56 - then you changed it to an image of a more monkey-resembling thumbnail - but I think the thumbnail would peak more interest if it would show the much earlier species, so people would be like: wow how did monkeys evolve from that, looks interesting, click
yeah this concept isn't new at all and given the timeframe we're talking about its very plausible remember this is over the course of MILLIONS of years. humans as we know them have only existed for around 200,000 years.
![[MV] A leap of faith...ความเชื่อใจครั้งสุดท้าย (From "Petrichor the series")](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/U1piZH2CNXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Visit brilliant.org/AnimalOrigins/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
Please do the evolutionary history of owls next. They're really fascinating birds of prey and I want to know their history
@Linda Godfrey, actually, owls are not birds of prey, the term "bird of prey" only applies to all species within the order Falconiformes, which is a large and diverse order of birds being divided into nine extant families, which are Cariamidae (Seriemas), Sagittariidae (Secretarybird and Fossil Relatives), Aquilidae (Eagles), Accipitridae (Hawks, Buzzards, Kites, and Harriers), Pandionidae (Ospreys and Fossil Relatives), Aegypiidae (Old World Vultures), Caracaridae (Caracaras), Falconidae (Falcons, Kestrels, Hobbies, and Falconets), and Cathartidae (New World Vultures), there are also extinct families of birds of prey like the well known brontornithids (family Brontornithidae), the dromornithids (family Dromornithidae), the gastornithids (family Gastornithidae), the terror birds (family Phorusrhacidae), and the teratorns (family Teratornithidae), owls are their own independent order (Strigiformes), birds of prey (order Falconiformes) are more closely related to fowl (clade Galloanserae), while the closest living relatives of the owls (order Strigiformes) are the swifts and hummingbirds (order Apodiformes).
i knew JESUS wasnt real
Albino u miss me
I didn't know primates were such an old order of mammals, that explains why we and the other primates are so different when compared to the other members of this order.
That’s where the name “primate” comes from. Besides opposable thumbs and high intelligence, primates retain a basic body plan.
I mean, it's at Order level, so the primates are pretty much as different or simmilar from eachother than you'd think.
@@whatabouttheearth next time you see a lizard or a frog, look at their arms and hands. Look familiar?
Honey, we’re basic.
Compared to hoofs, flippers, elephant trunks, even cat’s paws are more evolved and divergent.
we primates are an intelligent group though it's only us humans that were able to build civilization and enacted the course of history we see in historical media.
@@clod8 Yeah, I never noticed how basal our hands are, when compared to hooves and paws. Although I do think fingernails are a deviation from the more common claws in other land vertebrates.
Seeing how early primates look quite rodent-like, it’s not surprising that the closest living relatives of primates are in fact, rodents.
Rats are my relatives
Not rodents, shrews.
@@megangiles518 treeshrews arent actual shrews though
@@Minish4rk360 you are correct. I saw this comment before finishing the video, and the video calls them simply "shrews" at one point so I understand the confusion
@BeastMaster09, actually, the closest living relatives of the primates are actually the dermopterans, which would be the colugos (family Cynocephalidae) and their extinct relatives, with the treeshrews (order Scandentia) being the second closest to the primates, while the closest living relatives of the rodents (order Rodentia) are the lagomorphs (order Lagomorpha).
Good video, two things I'd like to point out. 1- The earliest primates were not frugivores, rather they were insectivores. Forward facing eyes and grasping opposable digits are traits of certain predator lineages that have evolved several times in distantly related groups. Large canine teeth are not needed for eating fruit, but are useful for munching bugs, lizards, and rodents. Not to mention increased brain size. 2- The new world monkeys did not raft to South America. They migrated there using Antarctica as a land bridge which connected South America and Africa at the time (which was periodically separated by water much in the same way that the Bering strait functioned for things like hyaenodonts, felids, canids, beardogs, hyenas, etc). This land bridge was also crossed by the ancestors of South America's rodents, litopterns, sloths, armadillos, anteaters, marsupials, etc.
I think you mixed up the land bridge part. Antarctica for a long time was a land bridge between South America and Australia, and that's how the marsupials reached Australia.
Litopterns, sloths, armadillos and anteaters evolved in South America and never reached other continents.
But there was no land bridge between Africa and Antarctica. Africa had broken away much earlier, long before the ancestors of current mammals (with the notable exception of the platypus) diversified. Rodents and primates are thought to have reached South America from Africa by raft over the then smaller Atlantic Ocean, possibly hopping along a now submerged island chain.
@@eljanrimsa5843 I mixed up nothing. The land bridge that was Antarctica connected South America with Africa and Australia. The marsupials outcompeted the placentals completely in Australia until their reintroduction by humans as well as bats on their own. The ancestors of litopterns, sloths, armadillos, and anteaters moved into South America and then diversified, which is exactly what I said, so I don't know why you brought that up. It was a gradual process.
@Eljan Rimsa, actually, not all rodents reached South America from Africa, only cavy-like rodents (suborder Caviomorpha) did, both squirrel-like rodents (suborder Sciuromorpha) and mouse-like rodents (suborder Myomorpha) reached South America from North America, new world monkeys actually reached South America from Southeast Asia, and the ancestors of carnivorans that are in the family Nasuidae family that contains the currently living coatis, olingos, olinguito, and kinkajou reached South America from North America before the Great American Interchange, also, xenarthrans did reach other continents, the only one they did officially reach is North America.
@@eljanrimsa5843 Is there any ancestor of sloth, armadillos, anteaters in Africa? Because as I know those animals is endemic to South America. And furthermore, some experts argue that mammals evolution may have a South America origin due to the simplicity of xenarthrans.
Also following tectonic plates movements estimations Africa was already apart from Antarctica in early cretaceous about 120 million ya. Unless those animals existed in that era like rodents to make their own way to Antarctica and then south America, the history must be reviewed.
@@evertonfrancisco9149 I agree. I think that's the current scientific consensus. The only part of early mammal evolution that definitely happened while Africa was still part of Gondwana was the split between Monotremes and the rest (Theria). The split between marsupials (Metatheria) and the rest (Eutheria) happened roughly during the same time frame as Gondwana split up, so that's best left to the experts to figure out what happened where and when exactly. The diversification of Eutheria (Xenarthans, Afrotherians, Boreoeutherians) happened when Africa was already split from the rest. Any exchange at that time couldn't just walk over a land bridge but involved some rafting and island hopping.
I would be sooooo interested in seeing you do one of these on Suina. I think pigs and peccaries are really fascinating animals and I'd love to learn more about their evolution and ancestry. Do you think you might cover that in a future video?
@Nerderific, actually, peccaries are a separate family (Tayassuidae) from pigs (family Suidae), while both families are similar in some characteristics, pigs (family Suidae) and peccaries (family Tayassuidae) are not closely related, they belong to two different superfamilies, pigs (family Suidae) are the only surviving family within the superfamily Suoidea, while peccaries (family Tayassuidae) are the sole surviving family of the superfamily Tayassuoidea.
@@indyreno2933 What I meant to say is Suina. Autocorrect. I didn't catch it I guess. Now it's fixed, though. I'm well aware that peccaries and pigs are very different animal groups.
In fact, there are just two suborders of even-toed hoofed mammals (order Artiodactyla), Neoselenodontia (Herbivorous Even-Toed Hoofed Mammals) with the infraorders Tragulina (Chevrotains and Fossil Relatives), Ceratodonta (Musk Deer, Water Deer, and Fossil Relatives), Tylopoda (Camels and Fossil Relatives), and Pecora (Bovids, Deer, Giraffes, Okapi, and Pronghorn) and Bunodontia (Omnivorous Even-Toed Hoofed Mammals) with the infraorders Hyomorpha/Suina (Pigs, Peccaries, and Fossil Relatives) and Ancodonta (Hippos and Fossil Relatives), while most of the even-toed hoofed mammal superfamilies are monotypic like Traguloidea, Cameloidea, Cervoidea, Bovoidea, Tayassuoidea, Suoidea, and Hippopotamoidea, the only two superfamilies of even-toed hoofed mammals that are polytypic are Moschoidea, which contains two monotypic families being Hydropotidae and Moschidae and Giraffoidea, which contains two extant families being Antilocapridae and Giraffidae.
@@indyreno2933 it's interesting how giraffidae used to be so much more diverse, now theres only (one?) Species left
Actually, the Giraffidae family has a total of nine extant species, being the okapi (Okapia johnstoni), the nigerian giraffe (Giraffa peralta), the kordofan giraffe (Giraffa antiquorum), the nubian giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa reticulata), the masai giraffe (Giraffa tippelskirchi), the thornicroft's giraffe (Giraffa thornicrofti), the angolan giraffe (Giraffa angolensis), and the cape giraffe (Giraffa capensis), for the whole superfamily Giraffoidea, the only living member of its other extant family being Antilocapridae is the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), so it's a total of ten extant members of the whole superfamily Giraffoidea.
Reject modernity, return to Monke.
Seriously though, great video. 😀
Ah Mohnke
From an insect eating rat-squirrel to an eternal indestructible star eater in less than 65 million years. Your move, Archosaurs?
We will stay same from the age of dinasours to this day we didn't change becouse our current form is enough
This is a really great and well put together video, I’ve developed a new appreciation for the new monkeys and old world monkeys :)
reject Monke, return to Shrew
Reject Shrew, return to Reptile
@@journeythroughearthshistor5600 reject reptile, return to amphibian
Reject amphibian return to fish
@@sillygoose2347 reject fish, return to single celled organisms
@@sillygoose2347 reject fish, return to single celled organisms
A hate the fact that humans aren't brought up when he talking about the apes. Humans are just another species of animal, and we aren't entirely special among life.
I love the video of the monkey evolution
That orangutan casually driving kills me 😂
It has better driving skills than me!
@@TheCimbrianBull she was taught. You can learn too
Ah,so I will finally be seeing the origins of the monkeys that I so praise..
It certainly looks...interesting
that's narcist
@@eriksaari4430 what
"Get those monkeys back to the fields"-👴🏻
@@JamariusPharrel how did u make it racist
@@kuirkyy because I'm a monkey too
I absolutely love monkeys, especially the old world ones!
Nice video man, love it. Audio is a bit low but I liked it. Thanks for the education!
Another one that is going to be interesting sense the monkeys are the closest non ape relatives btw can you please do evolution of Horses or Dogs next
This is going to be an interesting video
can you consider doing a video on the evolution of shoebill birds? i havent seen it been done
Reject monke, return to shrew.
"I'm kind of an idiot in real life."
Yeah we can tell by how you presented stem primates as being contentious
Damn you sound like an egotist
@@TheFluffestMango nope just tired of paleontology youtube channels being run by people with no actual education in the field.
As well as whole videos being essentially one person reading off of wikipedia
Can you make a video about big birds such as ostriches, rheas, and cassowaries?
This means that, cladistically speaking, apes, and therefore humans, are a type of monkey.
yes
Yep we are all animals
@@JamariusPharrel irrelevant
We are just a grain of sand on the Biggest beaches! Who knows what will be here, 2 Billion years from Now!
Mecha Monkeys
The sun will fry the earth in a billion years or so as it becomes more powerful so probably little of anything.
Homo stultiens mobilphoniensis
ehhh probably not much if anything because by then the sun will have begun slowly cooking our planet and boiling off the oceans.
Thanks for dropping some monkey lore on us. You're doing the lord's work 🙏
NO, your 'lord' is foul stench mythology. THIS is science.
@@Dr.IanPlect oh yeah, smart guy? If my lord is "foul stench" mythology, then how come I haven't made a stinky in my britches since I started going to church? Your "science" has no explanation for that.
@@Astro_Crunch That's a good example of the mentality of the deluded.
@@Dr.IanPlect I know the good lord Jesus will keep my diapey fresh and clean. Can you say the same for yourself?
@@Astro_Crunch muted
Me: neurons activate
Good attempt at covering a highly complex topic in a short video
Good to catch-up with the ancestors.
Is that touhou music in the background?
Now we know how to return to monke
I wish we got more non-hominid primates in paleo media. Cebupithecia is my first pick due to the fact it lived in Miocene.
Short but excellent documentary
Great video, subscribed. Also what's the outro song?
Finally. Monke
what was the private with the red undershirt that you showed at the divergence of the haplowhatsis?!
the outro music reminds me of early 90s pet shop boys for some reason
Monkeys are like advanced and upgraded rats
The term old world monkey was originally intended to refer to all catarrhine primates.
Actually, the term "old world monkey" only applies to the superfamily Cercopithecoidea, which consists of three extant families, Cercopithecidae (Swamp Monkeys), Colobidae (Colobuses, Langurs, Snub-Nosed Monkeys, and Proboscis Monkey), and Papionidae (Baboons, Mangabeys, and Macaques).
@@indyreno2933Both groups are commonly referred to as old world monkeys. Catarrhine monkey is also a common term.
8:50 Btw, apes evolved from monkeys.
Doesn't bring up that humans are cladistically monkeys by extension.
The problem is that the term monkey doesn’t have a strict scientific meaning being that it’s been used since before evolution was understood. so you’re left with using it to refer to a group that isn’t really an entire group. People should just stop using the word monkey by itself anyway.
and all of them are a type of landfish 😂
@@jaredf6205 monkeys are another word for simians or simiiformes
@@jaredf6205All monkeys form a monophyletic taxon so long as you allow apes to be monkeys, so I believe "monkey" does have a valid scientific meaning.
outro music?
You do good work 👍
There is great achievements waiting in the future for this order
Cool.
Great info and context, thanks.
Oh yeah very cool, thanks for sharing this with us big dog
Do a video on the evolution of reptiles
It’s such a great video! May I repost your videos to the platform named Ganjing World which is full of clean and valuable videos? I will keep your videos as is for sure. Thank you to let me know!
New world monkeys look craaaaaaazyyyy
A person who calls himself an idiot and also knows that he is an idiot is most certainly not an idiot, but rather brilliant.
Keep it up like this, it's all very interesting.
Short one. but good I thank you.
"Hmm..... Monkey" -Master Oogway
You should do a video on the evolution of lemurs!
Evolute of Monke
"I'm kind of an idiot in real life" bruhhhhh 😂😂😂😭💀
Awesome!
Bro says sooo smoothly that only a ghost can hear him xD
I can't believe the rafting hypothesis. Like not sure what happened, but that can't be it.
Very entertaining video, however at 8:47 you mention the tip of Spain. Would be nice if you mentioned Gibraltar, the non-Spanish territory at the tip of Spain where they actually live, considering none of the monkeys actually live in Spain itself.
MORE VOLUME. Thanks :)
Aww look so cute🥰🥰( plesiadapis)
cool video
just discovered this channel and the touhou music for the outro REALLY caught me off guard
They had some decent songs
Hello my fellow primates :)
Return to Monke!
There are over eighteen extant families of primates, Lorisidae (Lorises, Pottos, and Angwantibos), Galagidae (Galagos), Lepilemuridae (Sportive Lemurs), Cheirogaleidae (Dwarf Lemurs, Mouse Lemurs, and Fork-Crowned Lemurs), Daubentoniidae (Aye-Aye and Fossil Relatives), Indriidae (Indri, Woolly Lemurs, and Sifakas), Lemuridae (Common Lemurs), Tarsiidae (Tarsiers), Aotidae (Owl Monkeys), Challitrichidae (Marmosets and Tamarins), Pitheciidae (Sakis, Uakaris, and Titis), Atelidae (Spider Monkeys, Howler Monkeys, and Woolly Monkeys), Cebidae (Capuchins and Squirrel Monkeys), Cercopithecidae (Swamp Monkeys), Colobidae (Colobuses, Langurs, Snub-Nosed Monkeys, and Proboscis Monkey), Papionidae (Baboons, Mangabeys, and Macaques), Hylobatidae (Lesser Apes), and Hominidae (Great Apes).
Stop
You split up new world monkeys way touch there are only two families of new world monkeys and you split up old world monkeys and there's only one family of old world monkeys also galagos and lorises are also in the same family and yet again go back to your redditor cave
Reno; do you still claim giant pandas are not bears?
@Ian Plect, carnivorans are divided into twenty-five extant families, Canidae (Dogs), Ursidae (Bears), Ailuropodidae (Giant Panda), Phocidae (Seals), Cystophoridae (Hooded Seal and Elephant Seals), Otariidae (Sea Lions and Fur Seals), Odobenidae (Walrus), Mephitidae (Skunks and Stink Badgers), Procyonidae (Raccoons and Bassarisks), Ailuridae (Red Panda), Nasuidae (Coatis, Olingos, Olinguito, and Kinkajou), Melidae (Badgers), Mustelidae (Weasels, Ferrets, and Minks), Lutridae (Otters), Ictonychidae (Zorillas, Muishund, Shulang, Huro, Grisons, Wolverine, Tayra, Martens, and Fisher), Felidae (Cats), Protelidae (Aardwolf), Hyaenidae (Hyenas), Nandiniidae (African Palm Civet), Prionodontidae (Linsangs), Poianidae (Oyans), Genettidae (Genets), Viverridae (Civets), Herpestidae (Mongooses), and Eupleridae (Malagasy Carnivorans).
@@Dr.IanPlect seems like he do
Return to Monke
do a sequel video on ape evolution.
we monkes
Monkey time
You should definitely do a video on the evolution of horses. Its just a suggestion but a appreciation your channel
How they became the Funny animal today ❤🐒
Monkeys and apes are considered ugly creatures by most people
I think some monkeys look like very ugly humans. Probably similar to the uncanny valley
Partly because they triggered our uncanny valley instinct
Things like lemurs or other non-simian primates don't usually get this bad reps though
Most people ugly too
Humans don't consider most humans to be ugly tho
Mmm, monkey
I think haplorhyni is supposed to be pronounced like the rhyno in rhynocerous, not like the rini in santorini.
I don't think the old world monkeys are commonly theorized to have deliberately crafted over the Atlantic. I'm pretty sure it's meant to have been more of an accidental thing.
Yeah, like a hurricane or something swept a few monkeys out to sea on rafts of debris, they landed on the shores of South America, and boom! New world monkeys.
he didnt say it was deliberate I dont think anyone thinks that
@@eduardofreitas8336 yes it was definitely accidental lol
RAT TO MONKE
thats me
Reject civilization *become monkee*
Monkeys didn't raft to New Guinea though.
could you do rabbits?
There are bald bearded and mustached monkies? Lol yes humans
I was so anxious that you wouldn't mention apes being also monkeys but thankfully you mentioned it around min 9:00 .
This weird quirk of the english language to differentiate between monkeys and apes always irked me, because millions of english speaking people think apes and monkeys are totally different things, when in reality all apes are (oldworld) monkeys
my language doesnt have word for "ape"
scientifically we call all apes "human-like monkeys"
Should do video with zefrank1
are Primates and bats closely related?
No, they belong to different superorders, primates belong to Euarchontoglires, while bats belong to Laurasiatheria.
primates are much closer to rodents and rabbits
bats are more closely related to horses, rhinos, pigs, hippos, whales, dogs, cats, pangolins, hedgehogs than they are to primates.
No Hubble! The particle will end up being bird poop
Return to monke
🤩
(our history) apes are monkeys and so are we.
reject humanity, return to monke
Monkeee 🐵🐵🐵🐵🐵
So apes comes from old world monkeys but mandrels and baboons are the biggest monkeys even though gorillas are bigger?
Mandrills and baboons are the largest non-ape monkeys, if that makes sense.
@Ollypa, actually, gorillas are not monkeys, they are apes, apes are tailless, while monkeys have tails, members of the infraorder Simiiformes are not called monkeys, they are called anthropoids, anthropoids (infraorder Simiiformes) are divided into two parvorders, Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys) and Catarrhini (Apes and Old World Monkeys), monkeys are a paraphyletic group of anthropoids.
@@indyreno2933 Gorillas are technically both monkeys and apes monophyletically, as they are still a part of the clade Catarhini, which contains all old world monkeys.
@Cerasinopshodgskissi, actually, the word "monkey" only refers to the taxa Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys) and Cercopithecoidea (Old World Monkeys), apes (superfamily Hominoidea) do not count as monkeys because they don't have tails, both monkeys and apes belong to the infraorder Simiiformes, where the correct word is "anthropoid", to include both monkeys and apes, monkeys are a paraphyletic group, while apes are a monophyletic group.
@Indy Reno Isn't Paraphyly based on outdated hypotheses from before the existence of Cladistics? It really should be updated or people will assume that old world monkeys are closer related to new world monkeys than to apes, instead of the truth that is the opposite.
Paraphyly have also led to people having different definitions of what a monkey is, some says that all Simians are monkeys other argue whether apes split off before or after Old world monkeys evolved.
There are only 2 logical definitions I can think of and both include apes.
1st - If monkeys are called monkeys because they belong to the same clade then apes are also monkeys.
2nd - If monkeys are called monkeys because of their looks than apes (or at least apes ancestors) should be called monkeys. (Old-W-monkeys arguably share more similarities to apes than to New-w-monkeys).
The way I see it as, is that all Crow-simians are monkeys since they looked exactly like monkeys and are the last common ancestor to all living monkeys.
Frieza probably watched this
the leader of the KKK probably watched this
Monkeys evolved from synapids.
Monkeys are synapsids but I guess you are technically correct
its almost same as Tree shrew in Southeast Asia!???!
small tip: I saw the first thumbnail of this video when it came out, showing the earliest species of monkeys like the one at 0:56 - then you changed it to an image of a more monkey-resembling thumbnail - but I think the thumbnail would peak more interest if it would show the much earlier species, so people would be like: wow how did monkeys evolve from that, looks interesting, click
But those weren’t monkeys
❤❤❤
" We wuz kangz n shiet "
The idea of monkeys rafting to America sounds absurd
there have been observations of animals floating on rafts or other debris in the ocean
yeah this concept isn't new at all and given the timeframe we're talking about its very plausible remember this is over the course of MILLIONS of years. humans as we know them have only existed for around 200,000 years.
i think they migrated during an ice age when America was connected to the rest of the world
8:34
Our origins is older than I thought
pinniped evolution