We all just got a good lesson in "Attention To Detail." The Judges "Temporal Switch" was in the "off" position... But, she had a good attitude about it.
Sure she does. It's just that the attorney's answer was conditional, and that condition was not made perfectly clear. They communicated and clarified. Done and done.
@@newinformation1942 No, it wasn't. The lawyer just failed to make the conditional nature of his statement clear. He clarified, and the judge accepted that.
also, unfortunately its hard to find out about judges without going down and listening to them in a courtroom, which most people dont have the time to do.
@@dustinirish7 Judges are either elected or appointed, depending on the position and the jurisdiction. It all depends on where the judge presides. Most of the time they are appointed, though.
@@gloriouslumi it looks like being a Judge in the USA doesn't carry the same weight as it does in the UK or the rest of the world. I guess that's why the USA legal system is built upon plea-bargains rather than trials.
If dude is not on trial yet he does not need to be there, the judge needs to clarify her questions and expectations. The judge needs to be reprimanded.
No, she doesn't. She sought clarification about the lawyer's statement. He provided it. She moved on. Nothing to reprimand. This happens a thousand times every single day. It was a simply miscommunication, and was quickly resolved.
@@ajm5007 If you watch the whole video series, you'll see that she didn't have jurisdiction, but she was trying to act as if she did. Because the defendant was absent, her efforts were stymied. In hindsight, it's obvious that she was trying something shady. After all, once she learns that the defendant is absent, what does she do? What problem is created? Who is reprimanded? There was no issue, as you saw. She wanted to flex on the defense, but fortunately she decided to CYA instead.
@@ajm5007 the whole thing was “we’ll see you on Monday” the defendant doesn’t need to be there for that. The judge was still wondering why they weren’t there.
@@ajm5007 - Except she didn't have jurisdiction, She kept rolling the case pretty much every Monday instead of putting the case on hold while waiting for her boss to come to a decision. She had no other cases before her because she was under investigation.
I've only been in court for one crime. I had to come back multiple times. 2 different female judges treated me like complete shit, and the one male judge treated me like a human. Makes me think females shouldn't be judges, in my experience.
@@skrewuguys you really had to bring your “my mommy didn’t love me enough” baggage into this and make it about yourself and your disgust of women? Do you seriously not see how unstable and maladjusted that makes you look to anyone with even an ounce of integrity? Please work on yourself, you’re only making yourself more miserable holding onto outdated primitive attitudes.
My Dad's lawyer is a boss like this guy. Super calm and collected. Asks normal sounding every day questions. Then wraps you up in your answers to prove you're wrong or lying. Love having a good attorney
Not a single judge was ever a successful, or even competent attorney. That's why they campaign for the bench, they cannot survive in the private sector.
@@Jeff-qs2ul it depends on what country (hell what state if you’re American) you’re in. Some have strict rules on who can and can’t be a judge; some don’t. Where I’m from you’d be hard pressed to make it as a judge without being one of the best prosecutors or defensive attorneys in 1000 miles.
Judges have for too much leeway in this country. The ideas of checks and balances are dead when you have the judicial system affectively legislating and overturning precedent cases with impunity. The Supreme Court disgust me.
@@McHobotheBobo It was always bad, but it's gotten noticably worse across all levels in the past 6 years or so - especially the federal courts, which used to be a bit more distinguished than the state ones.
It's probably cause everyone pushed to defun most in the justice system so now only the people who allow bribes and want power trips go in for the low pay.
more likely, its pressure plating 10-20 cases to settle at 9 AM with the judge trying to cow them to settle, and those that didn't settle, get heard then in the afternoon. That's why they need to be there at 9.
@@DataStorm1 fuck all that. If I have a 1pm hearing, then my ass ain't walking in there til 12:45 at the earliest. If they try to get me on a failure to appear, then that will be a nice little chunk of change in my pocket, once I'm all done with them. Provided that when 1pm rolled around I was there. I've woken up late for court, and I just show up early the next day and put myself on the docket, mainly just to get the warrant settled. Since no one knew I would be showing up, my Public Defender likely doesn't have my file on hand, if they are even there at all. Also I never schedule court dates for Friday's and 8f it can be avoided Thursdays. The worst feeling is missing court on a Friday and having all weekend to not run into cops, because of the warrant. Most of the time when asked for my name, I tell them and I go ahead and add on, that I have a warrant, simply because I woke up late for court and I'm going to be going in the very next day to handle it. Most officers don't arrest me, but there have been a few dick heads. One put me in cuffs and searched my car and then when he found nothing, he was like "I'm not going to take you in for your warrant but I might know someone who would." He proceeded to call a couple of people but no one answered. He then told me that today is my lucky day. Oh and the reason he "pulled" me over was even more stupid. Another time, I gave some people a ride to a motel, and I was homeless, living out of my mom's car. We were at the motel and I was waiting in the car for them to get checked in. Cop pulls up, approaches me and asks for my name, I told him the same thing as with the other officer. This officer however decided that he was going to arrest me. I pleaded with him that look I just woke up late for court on a misdemeanor charge and right now this car is my home, if you do this then you will be taking my home from me, as I won't be able to get it out of the tow yard because my mom moved out of state and I wouldn't have the funds to do so even if it was in my name. He didn't care. I was on the phone with one of my friends this whole time because I had my headphones hanging on my neck. I asked if he could come get the car. He said yes. I told the officer that I had someone on the way to come get the car and to not tow it. He still didn't care. I wish I knew some of the info that I know now but didn't back then. There was no reason to tow the car. I wasn't being arrested on any new charges, meaning the vehicle was not involved in any crimes, and there was someone on their way to come get it. Then there is a bunch of stuff that stems out from that. But weird thing was I ended up getting pulled over by the same officer 1 1/2 months later, this time driving a vehicle that hadn't been registered in like 5 years and didn't have insurance for just as long. He asked if I was on probation I said no, he asked when the last time I got arrested was, I was like "Last month, by you." He bent over to get a better look at my face and he was like, weren't you on probation then? I was like yeah, but that case that you arrested me on, they decided to just terminate my probation. Then the officer let me drive away. Like what the fuck, arrest me when the car was totally legit, but then let me go without even a ticket when the vehicle is totally illegal. That still blows my mind.
Showing up 4 hours early? Is this an international flight from the US to Afghanistan with a member of the Taliban, or is it a trial at a courthouse in the city center?
I'm sure that the judge doesn't have the authority to command presence - she can only judge what's presented. Question if she needs to. This god all by yourself theory needs to be torn down. They work for the people. They only Occupy those positions by the consent of the people- the intent was only to preserve our individual rights. It's time to make a point.
@@gimmethemshoes3938 Jury selection has already occurred if they’re ready to start the trial. There’s no reason for the defendant to be there until the trial starts.
@@gimmethemshoes3938 hold up, who selects the jury. For some reason I figured it would be by someone not involved in the trial. Because you can't have bias people, I would think. That would be the best way to make sure that the jury isn't being selected to maybe swing one way or the other I would think. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if that's exactly what is being done. The justice system is pretty fucked up most of the time. Convicting innocent people, turning guilty people loose, back into the world. Getting people to plea on some charges that it's already been proven that they are innocent from, and that person being so young that they don't realize exactly what kind of damage that plea deal will to them in the long run. I've had my rights violated, and then been charged for crimes that 1st off I didn't know it was illegal to start with but how they went about finding that evidence, totally goes against search and seizure rights/laws. Then when I talk to the public defender, whom of which has already watched the body cam footage and heard everything, I ask hey isn't this illegal search and seizure, and she agree but spends the next year just continuing the case over and over, until when I'm tired of going to court over the BS, then she offers me a deal, that on the surface it seemed great, but that illegal search and seizure, she was having me plea guilty to it, and a couple of other charges that she had me plea guilty to, that I was confused about where those charges even came from. (They rolled a bunch of cases, and moving violations all together.) Little did I know that by simply pleading guilty like that, my license was suspended until I got an SR22, except no one EVER told me. Til like 3 years later when I went to transfer my license out of state and they were like oh, well it says here that your not eligible for a license. Weird thing was, I picked up a couple speeding tickets in that time, and no one bothered mentioning to me that my license was suspended. Likely that SR22 restriction thing was expiring a month from then, so I just waited it out and then took care of it. I intended for this to be short, but the justice system gets my blood boiling and I just needed to get that off my chest so I could cool off.
@@Mnstr3nrgy Jury selection is a "each side takes turns removing people" by the defense counsel and the plaintiff counsel. The judge will first ask about any flat reasons why people can't be a juror(doctor's appointment, sick, etc) and then each side takes turns whittling the number until they are down to the remaining jury pool. This is done so each side of counsel has equal opportunity to cross out anyone that is showing an obvious bias from the outset.
@@ShaggyRogers1 thank you for this info. However it is now useless info for me due to the fact that I don't plan to be in a courtroom EVER again. I try hard to avoid ending up there these days, and I can't be on jury duty because I'm a convicted felon.
@@TisOnlyAScratchA lot of public defender's are pretty decent lawyers. Lots of experience. Only problem is they're probably only going to have ¼ the time to spend on your defense on account of the fact their probably swamped with work.
@@rttrttyan No, she clearly doesn't. She's just asking questions to get to the bottom of a POSSIBLE act of contempt of court. And when it's made clear that's not what's happened, she drops it and moves on. In what UNIVERSE is that thinking oneself is God?
This has nothing to do with law. It's a word play technicality on whether the defendant would be present that day. And when the clarification was understood she went on to accommodate for the scenario. People in these comments reading way too much into it lmao.
Read J. Thomas in Bruen: "In keeping with Heller, we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. To justify its regulation, the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest. Rather, the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation." He dumps "rational basis" review and moves towards treating a Constitutional right with proper deference, the "strict scrutiny" standard.
@@jplayzow clearly the judge is pissed because it’s 12 minutes after 1pm and the guy didn’t show up, and here they are: 12 minutes behind schedule and so the attorney has to explain himself, and he does so without making his client look bad.
@@ISawSomethingOnTheInternet She's pissed but notable does not mention that it *is in fact past one* nor does the attorney which would make him look stupid saying "They said they would be here at one if we went to trial" and also if there was a trial going there would probably be a Jury present along with whoever sits in the pews behind them to view the trial I'll admit I've never sat in on a trial or tried anything but those feel like rather key parts to this
Note that the Judge said 1 o'clock Monday but the defendant needed to be at the Court at 9am...... Just to show the judge had no hard feelings... and to push her ego point home.
@@realitynowassigned 24 years of them. An appointment time is an appointment time. Schedule for 1pm... only need to be there 1pm... not forced hanging around from 9am. At least in our Court system.
They are constantly in a quiz mode, trying to trick you and hoping for you to fail for lack of attention and understanding. Until they come across a smart intellect that passes every time because he’s always prepared for the worst. Excellent work! Now that’s $$$$ money worth paying for ! Ty!
It's a bit more important for the defendant. see about half the guys in these comments would make a deal of this and get in to a dick measuring contest in a place they have no dick. Big missplaced egos can never stand each other. Look at most Probably 90-95% of people who "Know their rights" are actually doing anything that will either protect those rights or advance their cause. Nope, it's just ego. There ar not many good parts about authoritarian governments but being able to pistolwhip a fool has got to be nice. Alas, due to the cruel tyranny of not living in a Cruel Cruel Tyranny so many fools must remain unpistolwhipped.
it is one thing living in your own world following procedures in the courtroom loosing sight of the real world but then loosing your mind from your own procedures in your own little world
Not at all. She's just seeking clarification as to an unclear statement that was made to her earlier. And when the lawyer clarified, that was the end of it.
@@ajm5007 I’m going to respond to as many comments you made this incorrect reply to that you are wrong. Especially since other people already pointed out to you that the judge was reprimanded on this case. She was wrong and you are wrong.
"The Rules Dictate That You Must Be Precise As The Law Is A Precise Endeavor." Shout-out Suits for teaching me she’s clueless and was probably bullied in high school with this power trip
@@Omen224 Yes, it is. Judges appear on election ballots, wherein citizens can vote to retain or remove them from the bench. Let me guess, you're one of "those people" who don't vote but love talking out your @$$.
Judge on a power trip, I get the feeling she has a chip on her shoulder against the defendant!!! I've seen that 100s of times and sadly so many defendants don't have a good lawyer and they let the judge steamroll the defendants defence during trial !!! A good lawyer would notify the judge that he will ve appealing within minutes of the end of the case for judicial misconduct and get a stay on sentencing with a motion to vacate the verdict will a mistrial !!!
Aside the comments all attacking the judge, the root issue was a simple miscommunication/misunderstanding/misinterpretation of the initial question and answer. We all have experience this situation in life via bf, gf, family member, coworker, friend, boss, etc.
Wait, so she said they were rolling on Monday at 1 pm and then told them to arrive at 9am? And maybe I’m just confused but I assume “rolling” means show up and act like trial will begin but nothing will happen unless whatever she is waiting on occurs? I don’t know the full story. I think I’ve seen the other shorts of this judge being btfo’d about not having jurisdiction until the Chief Justice handled something and she was unduly burdening the defendant
To roll a case is to TENTATIVELY reschedule it. That is, it's effectively the judge saying, "We'll commence on this date ASSUMING that the various conditions we've already discussed are met by then. If not, then we will instead meet on this date to roll the case AGAIN."
"that's not what you said" correct. I started my statement by explaining it's what I meant. Because I misunderstood to question, I gave the wrong answer. Now that I fully understand the question, I'm giving you the right, complete answer.
@@JC06NJ 100% of the time? Nah. But not nearly as much as women let emotion take over. My fav boss ever was a woman. And so were the worst 3 I've ever had.
@@sheer_1 every male boss I ever had were fucking dicks......and I'm a man as well. It's the reason they're the boss.....male/female doesn't matter.......
My lawyer used to do this for me all the time. So many hours he helped me from losing money sitting in court. I had a great lawyer, was your criminal, trail and civil. Most lawyers not only do one and know less about the law than i do and I'm not one to represent myself unless it's a bullshit case.
Just like your drivers license, a basic exam of your eyes, your ears, your mental acuity. If you don’t pass one of them, you don’t get your license, they gotta do the same for these positions of power in Congress and judicial and police.
Need more context. If the judge asked if the defendant was “going to be here” that day and the attorney answered yes, then the attorney was being dishonest.
@@LehewTechwhat’s the situation then mister brainiac? Since you can extrapolate more info from this 30 sec clip than us with your magical insightful talents.
@@LehewTechfrom the 30 seconds we can see, lawyer said his defendant was gonna show, and he never showed. Now he’s back pedaling and explaining that actually he meant he would show IF the conditions he just made up on the spot were met. The judge was supposed to read the dudes mind? Lack of communication on the lawyers side
People are talking like the judge is tripping. But, was the lawyer simply wiggling out of his client missing the appointment? If that client was not required to be there, I would expect at another client to be there. Otherwise, why was he there at all?
Attorney here. Male judges are far, far worse. They make emotional rulings WAY more often than the women do. The women KNOW that this sexist stereotype exists, and so they do their best to avoid it. The men are more likely to be ignorant bigots like you who let their feelings determine everything.
The judge is being ridiculous here. Before you go to trial there are times that the attornies meet with the judge; to determine things like, are we even going to trial? This was one of those times. So the judge, previously, asked if the defendant would be there and the defense attorney said, "yes." He meant, "yes, he'll be here during trial." But she apparently took it as he was going to be there for when they were setting/confirming the date/time of the trial. So she grilled him on that. But he, rightfully, pointed out that they weren't actually going over anything that needed the defendant present...which is why he wasn't present.
No. AI is wrong more than 405 of the time. I have seen herb books written by AI that would get you killed recommending poisonous plants, and other experts also show similar results. Facial recognition is wrong 905 of the time in the UK and they are still trying to use it as evidence.
The judge seemed to have been clear in her mind that the defendant should be present. Play any semantic game you want to but I'd recommend the dependent appear at the next proceeding...
That's the most irresponsible lawyer who is wasting time of court without clearly answering and is just dragging around a simple answer.... He is just lucky that the just is lenient otherwise would have faced contempt of court 😂
The judge cleary does not understand the difference between the preset and the future tense.
Sounded like he handled it pretty well to me
We all just got a good lesson in "Attention To Detail." The Judges "Temporal Switch" was in the "off" position... But, she had a good attitude about it.
Sure she does. It's just that the attorney's answer was conditional, and that condition was not made perfectly clear. They communicated and clarified. Done and done.
@@newinformation1942
No, it wasn't. The lawyer just failed to make the conditional nature of his statement clear. He clarified, and the judge accepted that.
@@ajm5007 You win!
This is why you need to pay attention when you're voting a judge in.
I've never once seen more than one on a ballot for any given position. How do ya like that?
also, unfortunately its hard to find out about judges without going down and listening to them in a courtroom, which most people dont have the time to do.
Yall vote for judges?
@@dustinirish7 Judges are either elected or appointed, depending on the position and the jurisdiction. It all depends on where the judge presides. Most of the time they are appointed, though.
@@gloriouslumi it looks like being a Judge in the USA doesn't carry the same weight as it does in the UK or the rest of the world. I guess that's why the USA legal system is built upon plea-bargains rather than trials.
If dude is not on trial yet he does not need to be there, the judge needs to clarify her questions and expectations. The judge needs to be reprimanded.
No, she doesn't. She sought clarification about the lawyer's statement. He provided it. She moved on. Nothing to reprimand. This happens a thousand times every single day. It was a simply miscommunication, and was quickly resolved.
@@ajm5007 If you watch the whole video series, you'll see that she didn't have jurisdiction, but she was trying to act as if she did. Because the defendant was absent, her efforts were stymied.
In hindsight, it's obvious that she was trying something shady. After all, once she learns that the defendant is absent, what does she do? What problem is created? Who is reprimanded? There was no issue, as you saw. She wanted to flex on the defense, but fortunately she decided to CYA instead.
@@ajm5007 yes she does and she already has lol for this case too there is very limited context in this clip
@@ajm5007 the whole thing was “we’ll see you on Monday” the defendant doesn’t need to be there for that. The judge was still wondering why they weren’t there.
@@ajm5007 - Except she didn't have jurisdiction, She kept rolling the case pretty much every Monday instead of putting the case on hold while waiting for her boss to come to a decision. She had no other cases before her because she was under investigation.
This lawyer actually destroys this judge on another day.
I would like to watch that. Have a link?
@@MrLelopes i think its the same one ill look and see if i can find it.
@middlifekrysis4750 please do. Thank you
@@middlifekrysis47506 months later I’m still waiting
Yeah. He tells her she doesn’t have the legal standing to do what she threatened.
Argumentative judge nitpicking because of her ego. Totally owned by the lawyer.
I've only been in court for one crime. I had to come back multiple times. 2 different female judges treated me like complete shit, and the one male judge treated me like a human.
Makes me think females shouldn't be judges, in my experience.
@@skrewuguys you really had to bring your “my mommy didn’t love me enough” baggage into this and make it about yourself and your disgust of women? Do you seriously not see how unstable and maladjusted that makes you look to anyone with even an ounce of integrity? Please work on yourself, you’re only making yourself more miserable holding onto outdated primitive attitudes.
@@skrewuguysor cops lol
or vote.
@@skrewuguys damn 3 people, an overwhelming sample size right there
My Dad's lawyer is a boss like this guy. Super calm and collected. Asks normal sounding every day questions. Then wraps you up in your answers to prove you're wrong or lying. Love having a good attorney
Think of what a bad attorney, she probably was at some point in her life.
Not a single judge was ever a successful, or even competent attorney. That's why they campaign for the bench, they cannot survive in the private sector.
Fun fact, not all states require a judge to have previously been a lawyer. So a judge can become a judge without knowing the law.
TRUMP APPOINTEE
@@bend3rbot 😂😂😂😂😂
It's far more likely you appointed this judge.
@@Jeff-qs2ul it depends on what country (hell what state if you’re American) you’re in. Some have strict rules on who can and can’t be a judge; some don’t. Where I’m from you’d be hard pressed to make it as a judge without being one of the best prosecutors or defensive attorneys in 1000 miles.
This judge is an example of the justice system in free fall failure
Judges have for too much leeway in this country. The ideas of checks and balances are dead when you have the judicial system affectively legislating and overturning precedent cases with impunity. The Supreme Court disgust me.
Fun fact:It was always this bad now we just get to see it more
Its evidence of bad voters or uninformed democracy.
@@McHobotheBobo It was always bad, but it's gotten noticably worse across all levels in the past 6 years or so - especially the federal courts, which used to be a bit more distinguished than the state ones.
It's probably cause everyone pushed to defun most in the justice system so now only the people who allow bribes and want power trips go in for the low pay.
Get there at 9AM for a 1PM hearing, yea right! 😂 That hearing probably wont start till 130-2 anyway.
more likely, its pressure plating 10-20 cases to settle at 9 AM with the judge trying to cow them to settle, and those that didn't settle, get heard then in the afternoon. That's why they need to be there at 9.
@@DataStorm1 fuck all that. If I have a 1pm hearing, then my ass ain't walking in there til 12:45 at the earliest. If they try to get me on a failure to appear, then that will be a nice little chunk of change in my pocket, once I'm all done with them.
Provided that when 1pm rolled around I was there. I've woken up late for court, and I just show up early the next day and put myself on the docket, mainly just to get the warrant settled. Since no one knew I would be showing up, my Public Defender likely doesn't have my file on hand, if they are even there at all.
Also I never schedule court dates for Friday's and 8f it can be avoided Thursdays. The worst feeling is missing court on a Friday and having all weekend to not run into cops, because of the warrant. Most of the time when asked for my name, I tell them and I go ahead and add on, that I have a warrant, simply because I woke up late for court and I'm going to be going in the very next day to handle it. Most officers don't arrest me, but there have been a few dick heads. One put me in cuffs and searched my car and then when he found nothing, he was like "I'm not going to take you in for your warrant but I might know someone who would." He proceeded to call a couple of people but no one answered. He then told me that today is my lucky day. Oh and the reason he "pulled" me over was even more stupid.
Another time, I gave some people a ride to a motel, and I was homeless, living out of my mom's car. We were at the motel and I was waiting in the car for them to get checked in. Cop pulls up, approaches me and asks for my name, I told him the same thing as with the other officer. This officer however decided that he was going to arrest me. I pleaded with him that look I just woke up late for court on a misdemeanor charge and right now this car is my home, if you do this then you will be taking my home from me, as I won't be able to get it out of the tow yard because my mom moved out of state and I wouldn't have the funds to do so even if it was in my name. He didn't care. I was on the phone with one of my friends this whole time because I had my headphones hanging on my neck. I asked if he could come get the car. He said yes. I told the officer that I had someone on the way to come get the car and to not tow it. He still didn't care. I wish I knew some of the info that I know now but didn't back then. There was no reason to tow the car. I wasn't being arrested on any new charges, meaning the vehicle was not involved in any crimes, and there was someone on their way to come get it. Then there is a bunch of stuff that stems out from that.
But weird thing was I ended up getting pulled over by the same officer 1 1/2 months later, this time driving a vehicle that hadn't been registered in like 5 years and didn't have insurance for just as long. He asked if I was on probation I said no, he asked when the last time I got arrested was, I was like "Last month, by you." He bent over to get a better look at my face and he was like, weren't you on probation then? I was like yeah, but that case that you arrested me on, they decided to just terminate my probation. Then the officer let me drive away. Like what the fuck, arrest me when the car was totally legit, but then let me go without even a ticket when the vehicle is totally illegal. That still blows my mind.
@@Mnstr3nrgy I've never had this experience, because I don't break the fucking law all the time like a goof. Try it, it's amazing.
@@Jagabot_Esq. ur a good boy want a cookie and a pat on the back 🤣🤣🤣🤡
@@Mnstr3nrgy you need to chill out with the crimes my guy. Most people don't have a routine for when they have warrants.
@TheDUIGuyPlus please stay healthy and don't get tired. We need you. Thank you for your work.
Showing up 4 hours early? Is this an international flight from the US to Afghanistan with a member of the Taliban, or is it a trial at a courthouse in the city center?
Courthouse, Taliban, same thing.
I'm sure that the judge doesn't have the authority to command presence - she can only judge what's presented.
Question if she needs to.
This god all by yourself theory needs to be torn down. They work for the people. They only Occupy those positions by the consent of the people- the intent was only to preserve our individual rights. It's time to make a point.
This video ended with the trial being scheduled for Monday at 1pm but you need to be here at 9. Huh?
@@gimmethemshoes3938 Jury selection has already occurred if they’re ready to start the trial. There’s no reason for the defendant to be there until the trial starts.
@@gimmethemshoes3938 hold up, who selects the jury. For some reason I figured it would be by someone not involved in the trial. Because you can't have bias people, I would think. That would be the best way to make sure that the jury isn't being selected to maybe swing one way or the other I would think. Then again, I wouldn't be surprised if that's exactly what is being done. The justice system is pretty fucked up most of the time. Convicting innocent people, turning guilty people loose, back into the world. Getting people to plea on some charges that it's already been proven that they are innocent from, and that person being so young that they don't realize exactly what kind of damage that plea deal will to them in the long run.
I've had my rights violated, and then been charged for crimes that 1st off I didn't know it was illegal to start with but how they went about finding that evidence, totally goes against search and seizure rights/laws. Then when I talk to the public defender, whom of which has already watched the body cam footage and heard everything, I ask hey isn't this illegal search and seizure, and she agree but spends the next year just continuing the case over and over, until when I'm tired of going to court over the BS, then she offers me a deal, that on the surface it seemed great, but that illegal search and seizure, she was having me plea guilty to it, and a couple of other charges that she had me plea guilty to, that I was confused about where those charges even came from. (They rolled a bunch of cases, and moving violations all together.)
Little did I know that by simply pleading guilty like that, my license was suspended until I got an SR22, except no one EVER told me. Til like 3 years later when I went to transfer my license out of state and they were like oh, well it says here that your not eligible for a license.
Weird thing was, I picked up a couple speeding tickets in that time, and no one bothered mentioning to me that my license was suspended. Likely that SR22 restriction thing was expiring a month from then, so I just waited it out and then took care of it.
I intended for this to be short, but the justice system gets my blood boiling and I just needed to get that off my chest so I could cool off.
@@Mnstr3nrgy Jury selection is a "each side takes turns removing people" by the defense counsel and the plaintiff counsel. The judge will first ask about any flat reasons why people can't be a juror(doctor's appointment, sick, etc) and then each side takes turns whittling the number until they are down to the remaining jury pool. This is done so each side of counsel has equal opportunity to cross out anyone that is showing an obvious bias from the outset.
@@ShaggyRogers1 thank you for this info. However it is now useless info for me due to the fact that I don't plan to be in a courtroom EVER again. I try hard to avoid ending up there these days, and I can't be on jury duty because I'm a convicted felon.
1pm as in this 1 🖕...
Thank God for good lawyers
Agreed. Too bad I can't afford them.
Yeah without bad judges, and a corrupt judiciary system, you wouldn’t need good lawyers, and a millionaires bankroll.
@@TisOnlyAScratchA lot of public defender's are pretty decent lawyers. Lots of experience. Only problem is they're probably only going to have ¼ the time to spend on your defense on account of the fact their probably swamped with work.
I agree man god bless good lawyers cuz judges are dumb asf
Thank you, Zeus.
Judges think they’re God
This one doesn't.
@@ajm5007 yes, she clearly does.
Truer words have never bern spoken
@@rttrttyan No, she clearly doesn't. She's just asking questions to get to the bottom of a POSSIBLE act of contempt of court. And when it's made clear that's not what's happened, she drops it and moves on. In what UNIVERSE is that thinking oneself is God?
Lets seesoon
'And I suggest you all to be here.'
You're a judge. Not a passive agressive teenager. Grow up.
She got kinda cut off but you can hear her say "at 9..." So probably wasn't being a petty child but was just giving them advice to show ip early
Shes a female, thats literally against her nature. That's like asking a cricket to not hop.
@@ganondork6284 By 4 hours? Sounds petty to me
I can tell you're a child by your comment
*aggressive
Scary when a judge doesn't know how the law works.
The law doesn't work fool.
This has nothing to do with law. It's a word play technicality on whether the defendant would be present that day.
And when the clarification was understood she went on to accommodate for the scenario.
People in these comments reading way too much into it lmao.
The best wordsmithing I have ever seen.
Read J. Thomas in Bruen:
"In keeping with Heller, we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. To justify its regulation, the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest. Rather, the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation."
He dumps "rational basis" review and moves towards treating a Constitutional right with proper deference, the "strict scrutiny" standard.
Bad Judge has no idea how her job works. Just another example of our broken justice system.
No system that is run by people is ever flawless, but calling it broken is disingenuous.
@@TheSergio1021 Yeah Corrupt is more accurate.
you think an AI justice system would be more appropriate just because of the fact that robots cant make mistakes like humans do? Didnt think so
It's not broken. Its running the exact way it was designed to. To screw the poor.
Women are not to hold authority over men. 1 Timothy 2
Are judges allowed to start a court case before its scheduled time? Seems kind of unethical to do so.
If everyone is ready to go yes if not I'm almost certain no but there isn't a whole lot to be done about it this is clearly not her first power trip
There is a time stamp. It’s not early.
@@ISawSomethingOnTheInternet i feel like the fact neither of them mentions that it is in fact one and then some says that time stamp is off
@@jplayzow clearly the judge is pissed because it’s 12 minutes after 1pm and the guy didn’t show up, and here they are: 12 minutes behind schedule and so the attorney has to explain himself, and he does so without making his client look bad.
@@ISawSomethingOnTheInternet She's pissed but notable does not mention that it *is in fact past one* nor does the attorney which would make him look stupid saying "They said they would be here at one if we went to trial" and also if there was a trial going there would probably be a Jury present along with whoever sits in the pews behind them to view the trial I'll admit I've never sat in on a trial or tried anything but those feel like rather key parts to this
Note that the Judge said 1 o'clock Monday but the defendant needed to be at the Court at 9am......
Just to show the judge had no hard feelings...
and to push her ego point home.
You've obviously never seen a courtroom
The shit system should be burned and rebuilt. They tell this to everyone. No one has ever shit on my time as much as my ex, and my local courthouse..
@@realitynowassigned
24 years of them.
An appointment time is an appointment time.
Schedule for 1pm...
only need to be there 1pm...
not forced hanging around from 9am.
At least in our Court system.
Ah yes another internet expert
maybe the Italians have the right idea...
The DUI always on point! Another lawyer would've lost the case. Big Ups DUI Guy+😎👍
She suggested...lol she really needs to be careful with her words.
They are constantly in a quiz mode, trying to trick you and hoping for you to fail for lack of attention and understanding. Until they come across a smart intellect that passes every time because he’s always prepared for the worst.
Excellent work! Now that’s $$$$ money worth paying for ! Ty!
If you have court at 1, you show up for court at 1, not at 9. Nobody shows up for court 4 hours early.
He's a Great Lawyer. He would be a Great Judge as well.
No, that judge specifically needs to be disbarred. Re-rolling a case several times within a week, is wasting Court time and resources
Judge said the trial will be at 1 and ti be there before 9, what the fuck thats 4 hours before the trial
So she can start counting how much She doesn't give a damm about you.
Yes. He will be here anytime you want
EVEN when you cannot give me an exact time, or indeed an exact day or date.
He will be here?
Yes. When?
There should be an „Ego-test“ for every judge, police ect once in a year
It's a bit more important for the defendant. see about half the guys in these comments would make a deal of this and get in to a dick measuring contest in a place they have no dick. Big missplaced egos can never stand each other. Look at most Probably 90-95% of people who "Know their rights" are actually doing anything that will either protect those rights or advance their cause. Nope, it's just ego. There ar not many good parts about authoritarian governments but being able to pistolwhip a fool has got to be nice. Alas, due to the cruel tyranny of not living in a Cruel Cruel Tyranny so many fools must remain unpistolwhipped.
@@Snipergoat1 to control the ego and detect its triggers seems to be one of the biggest avhievements we can get
lol best we can do is a retention vote after a decade and everyone just votes yes to retain any judge in their color /eyeroll
Nice. Clever young man, he will go far. You can tell he's intelligent, and by GOD do we need more of those people.
The DUI Guy sometimes needs to set the bench straight.
it is one thing living in your own world following procedures in the courtroom loosing sight of the real world but then loosing your mind from your own procedures in your own little world
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂...this judge is not liking someone thinking sharper than she!
Not at all. She's just seeking clarification as to an unclear statement that was made to her earlier. And when the lawyer clarified, that was the end of it.
@@ajm5007 I’m going to respond to as many comments you made this incorrect reply to that you are wrong. Especially since other people already pointed out to you that the judge was reprimanded on this case. She was wrong and you are wrong.
@@ajm5007 As the other guy says here, you're wrong. Cheers
Watched a lot of your videos. You know you're awesome. Keep it up, this is education for all of us, and I, or we thank you.
A courtroom is one of the most dangerous places you can be, it's no wonder many companies settle rather than go through it.
yea those poor faceless oppressive exploitation driven, billion dollar companies and multiple law firms representing them
@@bdough5012 Soooo, you're complaining that they're smart and successful? Haters gunna hate.
"The Rules Dictate That You Must Be Precise As The Law Is A Precise Endeavor." Shout-out Suits for teaching me she’s clueless and was probably bullied in high school with this power trip
"Told you Ross was hot!"
Vote her out of office.
Unfortunately not how it works
@@Omen224 Yes, it is. Judges appear on election ballots, wherein citizens can vote to retain or remove them from the bench. Let me guess, you're one of "those people" who don't vote but love talking out your @$$.
I love how ppl put words in your mouth ,or they don't listen and presume you said this exactly
Judge on a power trip, I get the feeling she has a chip on her shoulder against the defendant!!! I've seen that 100s of times and sadly so many defendants don't have a good lawyer and they let the judge steamroll the defendants defence during trial !!! A good lawyer would notify the judge that he will ve appealing within minutes of the end of the case for judicial misconduct and get a stay on sentencing with a motion to vacate the verdict will a mistrial !!!
Very nice. 😉
I love this man !!!! Smart 1,000 retainer ware you at
Perceived authorities and a fragile ego are not to be in a position of power. 💯
Yet nobody feels the need to vote out the old
yet there they all are.
Its just how much points you put in charisma
This lass is trippin on her own power
shes PMSing. its that time of the month :(
Women in power. This is inevitable
❤ Everyone needs a lawyer and a great one at that.
C'moooon guys everybody has 4h to spare waiting in a super cozy courtroom🥰🥰🥰
Aside the comments all attacking the judge, the root issue was a simple miscommunication/misunderstanding/misinterpretation of the initial question and answer. We all have experience this situation in life via bf, gf, family member, coworker, friend, boss, etc.
Wait, so she said they were rolling on Monday at 1 pm and then told them to arrive at 9am? And maybe I’m just confused but I assume “rolling” means show up and act like trial will begin but nothing will happen unless whatever she is waiting on occurs?
I don’t know the full story. I think I’ve seen the other shorts of this judge being btfo’d about not having jurisdiction until the Chief Justice handled something and she was unduly burdening the defendant
To roll a case is to TENTATIVELY reschedule it. That is, it's effectively the judge saying, "We'll commence on this date ASSUMING that the various conditions we've already discussed are met by then. If not, then we will instead meet on this date to roll the case AGAIN."
This guy isn't just a good lawyer he's a savage lawyer
Why did she say be there at 9 for a 1pm court thing? Do lawyers really have to go in several hours sooner? Why?
"that's not what you said" correct. I started my statement by explaining it's what I meant. Because I misunderstood to question, I gave the wrong answer. Now that I fully understand the question, I'm giving you the right, complete answer.
She needs to be reprimanded !!!!
My dad is a judge, and everybody here is right he is a great lawyer, sign him up tag him make him a millionaire he deserves it
I wouldnt have done 18 months at CCI in ohio for an f4 failure to appear if i wouldve hired this guy
You deserved it
@@tyrlant2189 yikes
@@tyrlant2189 lmfao
"At any point, at any time"...like a boss!
This is what happens when you elect judges by popularity contest
Electing judges is better than letting someone just appoint them.
What exactly is your alternative?
?
Electing them is far better than letting some politician appoint their buddies to do their ideological bidding.
@@nip3004 One change could be to require a law degree or be a BAR Association member(practicing lawyer) in order to be appointed/elected
He did a great job, but there’s a lot more that makes you a great lawyer
Did she just say she expects everyone to be present 4 hours before (9am) the set time (1pm) of the proceeding?
this is why people say women shouldn't be in power
@@sheer_1 Yes, and men throughout history have shown 100% rationality all the time.
@jcoonz throughout history it's been proven females with power start more conflict than men.
@@JC06NJ 100% of the time? Nah. But not nearly as much as women let emotion take over. My fav boss ever was a woman. And so were the worst 3 I've ever had.
@@sheer_1 every male boss I ever had were fucking dicks......and I'm a man as well. It's the reason they're the boss.....male/female doesn't matter.......
My lawyer used to do this for me all the time. So many hours he helped me from losing money sitting in court. I had a great lawyer, was your criminal, trail and civil. Most lawyers not only do one and know less about the law than i do and I'm not one to represent myself unless it's a bullshit case.
Every time I come across this, my heart drops lol.
Just like your drivers license, a basic exam of your eyes, your ears, your mental acuity. If you don’t pass one of them, you don’t get your license, they gotta do the same for these positions of power in Congress and judicial and police.
You’re awesome! ❤
I need to see more of this lawyer
The process is the punishment. Move to a safer country as soon as possible.
"Do you recall me asking" gotta be the best way to say when did i ask
She is power tripping. Needs to be removed.
I’m with the judge, in court, everything is literal, what “you meant” doesn’t matter if it doesn’t reflect what you are doing/did.
This judge is so incompetent he had to say it three times in three different ways so she can clearly understand🤦♂️
You must be precise, because the law is a precise endeavor
This is a very good lawyer and the judge is a f****** a****** and she's very biased and I don't think it will end well for this person❤😢
If that’d be the case they could petition for another judge to take over.
You people just hate judges for no fucking reason, don't you? She didn't do anything wrong.
@@Eskolol they did and this judge tried to roll the hearing back again lol
@@ajm5007 you are just willfully ignorant aren't you? Research the case before you choose the hill you die on
@@ajm5007 she was reprimanded so yes she did.
It definitely works out in your favor to have a good attorney !!!!
We're starting at 1pm, everyone be here at 9am.
Damn, sounds like my last boss.
The court want the defendant to always be there for BS proceedings but the DA can just show up when they want.
Need more context. If the judge asked if the defendant was “going to be here” that day and the attorney answered yes, then the attorney was being dishonest.
He would be.. But only if..
lol ... "yea I said if we are gonna start, he's gonna be here. How can we start without him here?"
slick ... real slick
Video tag says 1:13.
Mr Hillsman is clearly late/absent.
Lawyer is scrambling to cover his ass.
No... thats not the situation
@@LehewTechwhat’s the situation then mister brainiac? Since you can extrapolate more info from this 30 sec clip than us with your magical insightful talents.
@@LehewTechfrom the 30 seconds we can see, lawyer said his defendant was gonna show, and he never showed. Now he’s back pedaling and explaining that actually he meant he would show IF the conditions he just made up on the spot were met. The judge was supposed to read the dudes mind? Lack of communication on the lawyers side
How nice.... that the lawyer has to explain simpel grammar to a JUDGE
Yeah. Sleazy
A good lawyer ia just someone who understands how to manipulate words
This is why you hire based on qualifications and not based on reproductive organs.
I will continue to hire based on the length and width of the fallopian tube, you can't tell me that it works.
@@spadedHVH 😂😂
That was magical.
Now, that's how you get a continuance when your client skips town. 😂
Judges are the worst.
*women or *jew judges are the worst. The rest are usually pretty solid
Words matter. What you say matters. No one knows what you mean if you don’t say it. The whole court system is built on what you say.
They are the real criminals
People are talking like the judge is tripping. But, was the lawyer simply wiggling out of his client missing the appointment? If that client was not required to be there, I would expect at another client to be there. Otherwise, why was he there at all?
Thats why women shouldn't have a position like this. Shes going to let her emotions ruin a person's life.
Attorney here. Male judges are far, far worse. They make emotional rulings WAY more often than the women do. The women KNOW that this sexist stereotype exists, and so they do their best to avoid it. The men are more likely to be ignorant bigots like you who let their feelings determine everything.
It has nothing to do with gender and everything to do with ego. There are plenty of male judges that are the same.
@traildriving women are more emotional though and prone to ego.
This court is in a really bad shape if the lawyer has to school a judge about how court proceedings work.
Actual dumbass commenting here but what does the lawyer mean like was she not specific enough I am honestly confused could someone explain lol?
The judge is being ridiculous here.
Before you go to trial there are times that the attornies meet with the judge; to determine things like, are we even going to trial? This was one of those times.
So the judge, previously, asked if the defendant would be there and the defense attorney said, "yes."
He meant, "yes, he'll be here during trial." But she apparently took it as he was going to be there for when they were setting/confirming the date/time of the trial.
So she grilled him on that. But he, rightfully, pointed out that they weren't actually going over anything that needed the defendant present...which is why he wasn't present.
@@yuukinoyuki9064 TL;DR she has a stick yp her butt
@@yuukinoyuki9064 thank you, I thought people were just echo-chambering and shitting on the judge.
@@yuukinoyuki9064 thank you!
“Logic counts data and stores value; rhetoric counts value and stores data.”
- For the grammar-knowledge.
replace all lawyers and judges with ai on blockchain for transparence and equality.
No. AI is wrong more than 405 of the time. I have seen herb books written by AI that would get you killed recommending poisonous plants, and other experts also show similar results. Facial recognition is wrong 905 of the time in the UK and they are still trying to use it as evidence.
Those 5s should say percent.
Ive been scared about going to law school and idk this is motivating me
😅a woman as a judge .....guess even the lawyer's gonna join his client in jail....
The judge seemed to have been clear in her mind that the defendant should be present. Play any semantic game you want to but I'd recommend the dependent appear at the next proceeding...
That's the most irresponsible lawyer who is wasting time of court without clearly answering and is just dragging around a simple answer.... He is just lucky that the just is lenient otherwise would have faced contempt of court 😂
The judge is in the wrong here.
Good lawyer.
Gracefully dancing with the language, he is worth his bill.
I need this man as my lawyer
Love this guy!
Anybody in a position that affects other peoples lives must be psychologically evaluated every term before they start the term
I always say the same thing, not only that, an reevaluation is needed every 3 years.
The rest of this is awesome, he takes that judge apart. 😂😂😂
Good lawyer is always needed. Seems like she would have abused her powers and pushed them through to whatever she deemed necessary.