What Is This Debris Falling Off The Sides Of Rockets?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2022
- Many videos of Chinese Long March rockets show huge amounts of debris being shed immediately upon liftoff, and I often get asked whether that's normal. These are of course foam insulation panels needed for temperature control and depending on the rocket and the location they might be to keep them cool or to keep them warm.
Ariane V Photo in thumbnail by Trevor Mahlmann www.tmahlmann.com/
Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
/ djsnm
I have a discord server where I regularly turn up:
/ discord
If you really like what I do you can support me directly through Patreon
/ scottmanley - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Mon through Saturday, SpaceX keeps space looking so easy. Anyone can do this.
Sunday, Scott Manley reminds us that space is really, really hard.
It's also a good illustration of some of the design decisions SpaceX have made, and why. Keralox top and bottom, one basic engine design, no insulation requirements, etc. Rather than building the most technically sophisticated rocket, they've built one that's optimised simply for ease of operation.
“Sunday, Scott Manley reminds us that space is really, really hard.” I don’t know, it’s just all those little engineering details you have to get right. The basic physics and engineering of rockets is not that hard (hence why amateur rockets exist).
@@Mike-oz4cv "Hearing thunder is no strength of hearing. Seeing lightning is no strength of sight."
"Perfection is difficult. Were it not so, it would be meaningless. There would be no reason to persue it."
@@simongeard4824 yes the best part is no part. complex simplicity.
@simon that reminds me of the design of the first japanese bullet train. to make the world’s best train, they didn’t start from scratch. they extensively researched existing material, design, and operations solutions for passenger rail travel and made decisions based on their own context and needs
For those who were wondering like I was before I Googled it, yes the polyurethane foam Scott is talking about is the NASA specific recipe of the foam we get in a can at the hardware store to fill cracks, gaps and holes in construction and marine uses. The "Great Stuff" brand is the most common brand. It comes in a red can with yellow lid. Also Gorilla glue is the same polyurethane adhesive without the foaming agent.
Okay, now which NASA innovation led to the Tempur-pedic mattress?
okay, the first part i knew, but the second I did not! that's neat!
also, the best part about that kind of foam vs the kind they spray in for insulation (2 part foam) is that it's mixture is calibrated in a factory, so always right. and once cured is completely innert. the 2 part foam will off gas for a surprisingly long (years) time, and if not mixed correctly can have serious issues (shrinkage and no adhesion to name some)
@@PremierSullivan I believe that came out of their emergency landing program. Hahaha
Uh, yeah, you can get Gorilla glue to foam, depending on how wet the area of application is at the time.
Interesting! I bought some Gorilla Glue the other day.
You are prolly the best science/space channel to explain in plain terms things like this. Plus I love listening to you speak with your accent. :P
He prolly is!
Accent?
Prolly
Prolly is how many USA Southern people say “probably” (fewer syllables & quicker/easier to say)
So many spell it that way too.
@@jamespatrick5930 iono watchu mean bruh
Excellent video as always. I want to add a small detail about the Saturn V. The commentary describes the insulation method used on the vehicle's hydrogen tank (panels in the early examples and spray-on foam on the later vehicles). However, the version of the Saturn V used for Apollo had two hydrogen propellant tanks. You describe the arrangement for the S-II second stage. There was also the S-IVB third stage. The interesting aspect of this is that McDonnell Douglas used a very different insulation arrangement on the third stage. They put it *inside* the hydrogen tank. The advantage for them was that the adhesive used to attach the insulating panels didn't have to work at 20K. The tank walls were milled to have inbuilt strengthening ribs and the insulating tiles were carefully sized to fit around these ribs. In some of the Skylab pictures, you can see the patterning on the walls of the station that show the layout of these tiles.
Another small additional point was that when the S-II had insulating panels (before spray-on foam was used from Apollo 13 onwards), they would pump helium down channels cut between the panels and the tank. This was to flush out air pockets, otherwise the air would liquify, run to where it wasn't wanted then expand again after the wet rehearsal and pop the panels off.
I wonder how much the folks who were involved in the spray-on foam innovation were sweating in the time between Apollo 13's explosion and folks figuring out why that actually happened. Even though the systems should be completely independent, if I'd been involved in a change that happened between back to back successful moon landings and Apollo 13's rather dramatic adventure, I'd be worriedly going through everything I'd done to try to find out if there was any way to get from the change I'd made to the accident that happened.
@@rashkavar Yup, when the Challenger exploded, the company I worked for was holding their breath a bit until the bad actor was located. This was because we did the tank, and if you look at the wall thickness and volume scaled down to a coke can, they weren't that different.
And one HELL of a lathe at Mishoud to turn the thing. I never saw that but my Dad did and said it was amazing. Largest lathe on Earth at the time, I'm pretty sure.
Those ribs would also impart additional linear strength to the tank, which at the time were problematic when depressurized. A few early missiles would collapse from their own mass if depressurized.
I do wonder though, how much hydrogen was retained in the foam, as hydrogen is infamous for infiltrating pretty much anything. Still, better inside than outside to slam into the stack as it's speeding through the atmosphere!
Rockets are easy. Make a bomb, have it explode slowly in one direction, add steering components, there you go. Making one that doesn't explode in all directions, that part's hard. ;)
Space is easy, surviving in space, tricky. There's a reason it takes an hour to open a hatch and the checklist is heinous, for good reason!
Getting back alive, trickiest of all. The Russians do it by making a spacegoing tank - I can't think of any US spacecraft that could enter the atmosphere inverted, but the Russians survived multiple times of service module failed separation resulting in inverted entry.
Holy crap Scott went to all the effort to make a video answering one question that’s been bugging me ever since I saw his deep space video.
Massive kudos, Scott, for referencing "Koyaanisqatzi", an amazing movie that I doubt most people have ever heard of. (It's a personal favorite of mine.) And yes, that particular scene was the height of the crescendo! [To anyone inspired to watch it: give it a few minutes, let the music and imagery wrap your mind up. It is truly awesome.]
I was fortunate enough to see it with Philip Glass conducting a live orchestra.
I have long wondered about that scene. They made it look like a Saturn 5 Apollo setup exploded, but I could never find evidence of such a disastrous test. I enjoyed the movie, but Philip Glass compositions are far too repetitive and become boring after a short while.
@@scottmanley I am insanely jealous of this!
my favorite movie of all time
@@4g0tten4 slow breath, silent mind ☺️
Thanks Scott Manley, I enjoy how your video narration is so comfortable, like you telling a story about an old friend you met in a pub, or how your dog leapt off the dock and suddenly found itself in a hostile aquatic environment.
12:17 The rocket that failed due to falling foam is not one of the Long March rocket. It was one test launch from a private company in China.
To be fair, he didn’t say it was a Long March, but I can see how he should have just stated the actual rocket company name to eliminate any confusion.
@@victorsinclair188 He didn't? I missed that. My fault on this.
Always far more interesting information than expected and so clearly explained Not a surprise really as all of Scott’s videos are just great
Yet another highly educational and fascinating video that taught me things I did not know about space flight. This channel is a treasure; keep doing what you do so well, Scott!
SpaceX Falcon 9 launches has no disposable insulation, and none on the stages per se I'm pretty sure (the fairing can have acoustic insulation). On streams of launches, you'll sometimes see odd bits flying off, and someone will ask what it is. The standard answer, pretty much a meme now, is
"Ice. It's always ice."
the reason for that is the speed of the fill. they include the tanking operation as part of the countdown, whereas most fill the rocket up and then start the countdown and associated things. also, the design philosophy of the falcon9 precludes anything frangible or expendable in a launch, and the mass of enough permanent insulation would limit performance
Since it's rp1 and lox, foam isn't really needed.
My guess is what they mean is it'd BETTER be ice. :-)
@@MrJdsenior Naw, it really is "it's always ice", because it's a frequently asked question. Think of a war movie with a jaded old combat veteran calming down the new kid, "nah, from the sound of it, Charlie is shelling the next sector down. Not our problem."
I really loved this video Scotty. The rockets I launched were D-5's; Below the surface of the ocean. Nitrogen and dehumidification kept ice away. Short umbilical too btw. Nasty payload.
Early viewer here! This is a good video that really answered the question, since lots of people watching rocket launches ask this question commonly. Thanks Scott, and for always flying safe for all of us!
Thanks Scott - I've been wondering about this exact topic for a long time. Great to have a simple but complete explanation - as always keep up the great work!
Mind Blown... In 50 years of watching launches I just thought this was ice. ONLY ICE. Thanks Mr. Manley for the education!
Thank you Scott, a question I've long wanted a proper answer to. I love the way you turned a relatively simple answer (it's insulation - end of video) into a fascinating detour into an aspect of rocketry I'd never given any thought to.
Incredible amount of production time, thanks so much for your time and knowledge to create these phenomenal videos.
I always enjoy and love watching your video. Learning so much. Thank you Scott!
Thank you so much Scott for the deep dive into this topic, as this answers many questions!
Another very good informative video. Love your work Scott. You fly safe as well 😉
Scott, great video and channel as always. Thank you for the mention of "Koyaanisqatsi." I watched this when I was 15 on late night TV and was completely mesmerized, but I never knew what it was called. I've tried for literal decades to find it, and no one ever knew what I was talking about. I recognized the explosion a mere moment before you named the movie. I am always learning something new from your channel. Thank you.
Great video, highlighting the depth and breadth of Mr. Manleys rocketry knowledge. It all just piles out of him like he can barely contain it!
I LOVE the old archival footage. Hard to find, barely recollected as I'm only 50.
Thank you for your mini documentaries sir
Been waiting for this particular topic, super not disappointed! Thank you again Scott Manley!
Thanks Scott. I was very interested in this to begin with. As usual you explained it in a very understandable way!
This always puzzled me, especially in the early MTV spots. Took a few years to figure it out. Thanks for confirming my suspicions!
It's Saturday night and I'm watching a Scott Manley video. Alone. And commenting. What have I become?
I knew about ice buildup, but I didn't know about foam. As always, learning something new every day.
I’m glad you made this video because I’ve always been wondering why stuff falls off the Chinese rocket
Thanks Scott, always learn something new from your videos!
Fascinating. Amazing the details about the various rocket insulation needed. Thx!
Lots I didn't know in this one! Thanks, Scott!
ANOTHER GREAT PRESENTATION. Thanks Scott.
Thank you Scott for your excellent explanation on the subject of things falling off of rockets. I knew the basics but you have deepened my knowledge with all your brilliant detailed explanations.
Thanks for the foam explanation, Scott. I always wondered but never thought to ask!
Yay! Happy to see Wallops featured with the Minotaur.
You have the best closing music ever and thanks for the falling foam explanation, I’d always assumed it was always just ice.
As usual, educational and outstanding. Love your videos sir.
When the Delta IV Heavy flies with a metallic fairing there are foam fairing vent covers which are pulled off. You'd really have to be looking for it, but i've seen photos which show the vent covers coming off. I believe cables are used to pull them off.
if they are sealing the vent to maintain conditions inside the fairing, it's possible that just the atmospheric pressure difference will pop them open
@@seldoon_nemar There are vents behind the covers. The covers are just on to keep out any dirt bugs while on the ground. Then as the vehicle climbs the air inside the fairing vents out.
@@mattcolver1 I realize, I was more just saying that they don't really need something like a wire when air pressure will remove them just as well
Fascinating subject matter. This is the type of things Scott does best.
Once again, I learnt a lot more about space flight! Thank you Scott.
Scott, another fantastic video!! 10/10, Top notch, thank you!!
Nicely explained, sir. You are the best.
Amazing...was just thinking during the April launches thus far video why the Chinese upper stages seem to gather so much frozen condensation compared to Western launchers
does it have to do with where the chinese launchpads are located?
Great video! Thanks Scott! 👍🚀
Awesome visuals, thank you!!!
Great information. Keep up the great work
Did NOT know about the grid fin issue. Thank you for the insight Scott!
Again a very interesting insight in rocket technology! Thanks a lot!
I’d love to see the details of the connectors that atttach the boosters to the main rockets. Must be very strong, but how do they attached to what must be a rather thin/fragile sides of the rocket. Love the your videos.
More fascinating answers to questions I didn't know I'd asked!
Thanks Scott!
WHOAH .. You brought back memories of my childhood .. "life out of balance" .. those Hopi chants are so mesmerizing.
As usual a great video Scott ! I’m beginning to like before watchin’ !
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Thanks, Scott. Very interesting.
Very interesting and thanks for the knowledge buddy. I didn't even know this happened
WOW, Thank you Scott!! The Atlas Centaur scene was on our TV every day in the 1980's, it was quite moving to me, and I have not seen it since. I had no idea what it was or where it was from. Thank you!!!
Hey, putting the tank on the back of the shuttle is a pretty good idea! During reentry, the wings were in a deep stall and the tail was inside some very nasty turbulent air/plasma. Having two tails at the ends of the wings would add some structural load but it would have had better rudder authority during reentry.
good question and clear explanation 😄
Interesting. learn something new every time I watch this guy
One of your best videos!!
Another great video buddy!
Thanks for the info scott
great video as always!
That last line really did "mesh me up" XD
Thank you for the good information.
I was convinced they were just big ass peices of ice. Great video as always!
Thanks Scott! You answered the question I’ve had multiple times watching the Chinese launch clips in your videos.
Ya, I just thought it was typical chinese quality!
@@barneymiller6204 Long March 5 and 7 don’t have this phenomenon only old Chinese rockets long march 2, 3, 4 like that
Thank you. Answered my question perfectly.
Your suggested configuration placing the external tank on the "top" of the shuttle away from the heat shield may sound good in theory, but one reason it was the way it was comes down to structure. The "bottom" of the shuttle had the hard points for the landing gear, and it looks like the external tank attachment points were in pretty much the same places. Since every bit of mass adds up, adding the additional structure "top" side would have probably incurred too much of a mass penalty. I'm sure there were other practical reasons too... among them I could imagine payload bay accessibility in launch configuration and the twin fins could have had all sorts of downsides - extra mass, control surface failure modes, etc.
Would it be possible to use some sort of heated thermal blankets; then just remove them shortly before T/O? Like they do with Formula 1 car tyres whilst there's a hold up in the pits.
Then put the landing gear on the top of the shuttle also and have it land upside down after re-entering upside up. It's even better to do it that way since then there would be no penetrations through the heat shield.
@@sealpiercing8476 One of my favourite things to tell people, which I probably learned here, was that the orbiter used to fly backwards to mitigate against damage to the crew compartment.
That's fly backwards in space. Not generally. That would probably be silly.
@@sealpiercing8476 I'd hate to be an astronaut having to launch and land like that
@@sealpiercing8476 : You don't need to put the gear on top, just put the thermal tiles on top.
Very enjoyable video, thanks again. Love these explainers and lots of details, great video, joke here and there. Scott is my go to space nerd for years now, he feeds my lesser space nerd brain.
_"Even if you don't have a side-attached payload it [the foam] is still something that can _*_mesh_*_ you up!"_
Oh you...
Please, don't ever change, Scott Dadley.
Wondering who else caught that (if that was the intent, of course) :)
Thanks scott for the video,i saw a long march launching the CBERS satellite and it fall a bunch of debris so i was asking me all day what it was,thanks.
This episode is super chill
Thank you for the video.
Thanks for answering my question from a couple of days ago. ;)
Good stuff Scott as always. ;^)
There was also the first two launches of the Space Shuttle, where they painted the external tank white to protect it from UV during its long periods of sitting on the pad prior to launch (this didn't turn out to be a problem), as well as aesthetic reasons. On the very first test flight (STS-1, Young-Crippen) the astronauts reported "white stuff" splattering across the orbiter's windows. Well, it was the paint on the tank. It was soon determined to be unnecessary, and 600lbs of weight were saved by leaving the tank unpainted, revealing the now-iconic orange spray-on insulation.
Classic example of commenting before finishing the video. Scott covered this.
@@lo1bo2 Ah hell, he did? I did play it all the way through but I had it on in the background, guess I was distracted. Oh well.
Love the Sadun 5 and Space Chuddle footage.
Another excellent video, Scott! Thank you.
If you haven't already read it, I highly recommend "Stages to Saturn", Roger E. Bilstein, published by NASA, 1980. It has an very good description of the LH2 tank insulation decisions for the S-IV and S-II stages - the S-II used external insulation and the S-IV (and S-IVB) used internal. (See pages 172-177.) After reading this, I wondered about the decision to use external on the Shuttle. Hindsight is 20-20, but it seems like internal insulation would have solved a lot of problems, some of them fatal.
happy easter from UK Scott
OMG, I was watching a Long March launch last week and REALLY wanted to ask you this question.
Great video! I was hoping you'd also talk about the interstage covers on Chinese rockets.
Thank you sir! Learned something new, so today is a good day.
Greets from the Netherlands 🌷, T.
Always wondered. Thanks...
Thanks for the answer that's been bugging me for a long time.
I remember watching the first Space Shuttle launches with the white painted tank, and then, later, the 'orange' tank. What I remember hearing was that they decided they didn't need the paint and the weight of it, however, I hadn't realized that the paint was on top of the insulation. Somehow I had thought that the insulation *replaced* the paint. Thanks for correcting that for me!
Kudos for the Outer Wilds postcard collection on the wall behind you.
Thank you Scott for putting this video together! I've been wondering about this ever since watching videos of Chinese rocket launches and this explained it amazingly well.
Still blows my mind all of the nuance details and calculations that need to be considered for a successful launch.
I looooove Koyaanisqatsi! As soon as I heard famous Atlas disaster, I already had it pictured in my head. What an ending...
I have heard that STS 1 and 2 were painted more because they were expected (and did) sit on the pad for several months before launch, and later flights didn't need the paint because they only sat out for a few weeks. Curious if anyone else has heard this?
no, they realized the paint added no protection and added 600 pounds of weight. eliminating the paint allowed 600 more pounds of payload, and saved material and manpower costs for painting.
The initial flights weren't flown at anywhere near the design payload weight, so one way or the other there was headroom for things like the paint early on.
I was amazed by some of the footage and photography in this video. As an artist I want to seek out some as reference. Do you have any recommendations on where to find this Scott? Thanks for the great video as always
good as always！
Excellent Vid 👍
Very informative
AWESOME! I just asked Fraser Cain about the material coming off chinese rockets but I just got the ice answer, and i thought they used room temp hypergolics. Probably could have worded the question better but THANK YOU FOR THIS ❤️
Excellent video, I thought it was just ice, ahh nope not always.
I saw the NROL-111 launch from the chincoteague KOA. I didn't know what the yellow shield around the rocket was for. Thanks for explaining that. Fly safe
That "banana peeling" footage is crazy! I'm guessing aerodynamic forces as the rocket climbs cause the "banana peel" to come apart, at strategically-placed weak points?
That foam is great stuff.