Why Some Corruption is Better Than None

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @nunooliveira2424
    @nunooliveira2424 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What a refreshing video on new ways to look at problems. I love it!

  • @turgidturbitity7415
    @turgidturbitity7415 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Having done engineering design for the UK government, i agree with some points but have a comment on the framing.
    I wouldn't say "some corruption is good", but rather I'd say "investigating all corruption offers diminish benefits", which you did say - but it doesn't follow that therefore some corruption is "good", but rather some corruption is "tolerated" for the public good
    Similarly, just because not all crime can be investigated, it doesn't follow that some crime is therefore good.

    • @turgidturbitity7415
      @turgidturbitity7415 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I do agree more on your bureaucracy points. Too many government stakeholders, many of whom have no opinion, get asked their opinion on public works.
      If done for good faith public benefit, I would agree that facilitating these works by either finding loopholes or even small level corruption can be good, as a public service that gets built is often better than the one that doesn't

    • @MichaelSeguinYouTube
      @MichaelSeguinYouTube  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree. I’m definitely playing fast and loose with the definition of good.

  • @fartconspiracist6360
    @fartconspiracist6360 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    crazy vid, love it

  • @Kulid-fg3gq
    @Kulid-fg3gq หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Editing style is great, I hope you grow big man!

    • @MichaelSeguinYouTube
      @MichaelSeguinYouTube  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! I’m testing out different styles to find the one that fits me best.

  • @ivycresent5968
    @ivycresent5968 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Kinda disappointed, was expecting an interesting perspective on how a small fraction of corruption contributes positively to the functioning of sociery. Instead you spent 17 minutes to say there are costs and benefits to reducing corruption, and that they need to be weighed. Like obviously going on an extreme anti-corruption crusade will have more costs than the benefit it provides…

    • @josh16
      @josh16 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

  • @tabss1464
    @tabss1464 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice video

  • @TheLuuuuuc
    @TheLuuuuuc หลายเดือนก่อน

    From a basic utilitarian point of view this makes sense. But once you accept, that even from a utilitarian perspective having moral codes (like "everything we build should be as accessible for disabled people as possible" or to make it very obvious "corruption is bad") makes sense for societies rather than single rational actors the entire argument structure collapses.

  • @Chicken.
    @Chicken. หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think you mean it is better to allow some corruption than to get rid of all corruption.

  • @Hobli_hoi4
    @Hobli_hoi4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    nice vid. before the fame

  • @binayakthakur5122
    @binayakthakur5122 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    grease and corruption in right amount is good for a system, too of much both makes the mess of the system

  • @ProductBasement
    @ProductBasement หลายเดือนก่อน

    -Why Some Corruption is Better than None- A Zero-Tolerance Policy for Tax Evasion is Cost-Prohibive
    Still an interesting video despite the bait-and-switch title

  • @billk.
    @billk. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where did my comment go

  • @Bravebacon4
    @Bravebacon4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The title is a little clickbaity, this is from an economist’s perspective who have no morals.