i was so happy when i saw a topic as it is written in my syllabus but after listning to him i am disappointed.. i thing his mode of teaching is hindi medium.. i cant make notes from what he is saying...
Alas! "Epporul yaar yaar vaai ketpinum apporul meipporul kaanbadharivu" Thirukural 423. Meaning: From whomsoever one hears about a thing, it is wisdom to understand the truth import of it. Chanakyathanam is ayokiyathanam! Chanakyan was a scoundrel and a cruel murderer who cut open the pregnant Queen and took the baby Bindusaran son of Chandragupta but queen died. Bindusara’s minister Subandhu had burnt Chanakya alive. Like any other dynasty Maurya did collapse and Kushan took over. Chanakyas idealogy neither saved him nor maurya kingdom. On Religious front also Chanakya is a total failure, Chandra gupta followed jainism and left the Kingdom. ASHOKA FOLLOWED BUDDHISM AND SPREAD IT GLOBALLY. With the Arthasastra on hand, India was ruled by invaders after invaders for 2000yrs none of the so called science techonology or arthasastra were helpful. So its all puranic gossips! Chanakya is painted as a scheming manipulator who could stoop to even the meanest level to serve his purpose. Encyclopaedia Britannica reported that Chanakya or Kautilya (Artha -shastra) presented no overt philosophy. But implicit in its writings is a complete skepticism, if not cynicism, concerning human nature, its corruptibility, and the ways in which the ruler-and his trusted servant-can take advantage of such human weakness. Chanakya openly advised the development of an elaborate spy system reaching into all levels of society and encourages political and secret assassination. So he is a treacherous murderor and morally corrupt. Artha sastra was written after Guptas period when sanskrit borrowed the Nagari script of Dravidian Nagars. Chanakyan lived in 300 bc when there was no sanskrit script so Who wrote Arthasastra? Not Chanakyan. Although the book was considered to be lost for many centuries, a copy of it, written on palm leaves, was rediscovered in 1904 AD. No palm leaf manuscript can stand for 2100yrs . So arthasastra is a hoax or plagiarism like Sushurata and other sanskrit texts. According to KC Ojha, Vishnugupta was actually a redactor of Kautilya’s original work, which suggests that Kautilya and Vishnugupta are different people. full of puranic story of copying or plagiarism..shameful acts of whom?
thank you sir for making the presentation simple. it was excellent to hear a simplified way of understanding a complex subject.
Very very thank you to whole team and specially to sir
Channel is helping me much much more......
What's the name of that intro flute music .... please let me know I really likes it.
Vid kam he... Lekin Knowledge he yaha..
Thank you sir
Intensive lecture
Full of knowledge and insight
Really useful as all the lectures in my college are done in hindi..
Saptang Theory : 36:30
It is very useful sir
Please upload part 2
Explain mandala theory and compare and contrast with other thinkers like Machiavelli and Gandhi
Kautilya is the best compared to Machvelli
Indian political system is based on dharma.Kautilya is more state craft
@@orlandobrown172 I understand, but please explain why.
thank you sir. It is really helpful :)
i was so happy when i saw a topic as it is written in my syllabus but after listning to him i am disappointed.. i thing his mode of teaching is hindi medium.. i cant make notes from what he is saying...
plz sir kutliya k ik lecture Hindi m do smj ni aai
In your ppt, it should be in detail what you said. But be thankful!
Thoughtful
Sir please lecture Hindi language may bhi provide kijiye jisse hm logo ka welfare ho
thank you sir you helped my MA Roshant from Sri Lanka,
sir hindi me lecture upload cv kre hindi midiam wale student ko problem ho rahi h samjhne me please hindi me upload kre
very very thank your sir as well as cec
thanks for upload
thank you sir
madam can we get pdf on this political thought lectures
Ya, can I get the pdf
R u guys preparing for upsc
so nice sir
Thanks a lot Sir.
Please continue in English
Awesome lecture
Is this for UPSC PSIR Optional??
Excellent teaching sir
thanks
Very useful
Thanks sir
27:17
Maza aa gaya
Please translste in telugu.. Sir..
Alas! "Epporul yaar yaar vaai ketpinum apporul meipporul kaanbadharivu" Thirukural 423. Meaning: From whomsoever one hears about a thing, it is wisdom to understand the truth import of it.
Chanakyathanam is ayokiyathanam! Chanakyan was a scoundrel and a cruel murderer who cut open the pregnant Queen and took the baby Bindusaran son of Chandragupta but queen died. Bindusara’s minister Subandhu had burnt Chanakya alive. Like any other dynasty Maurya did collapse and Kushan took over. Chanakyas idealogy neither saved him nor maurya kingdom. On Religious front also Chanakya is a total failure, Chandra gupta followed jainism and left the Kingdom. ASHOKA FOLLOWED BUDDHISM AND SPREAD IT GLOBALLY. With the Arthasastra on hand, India was ruled by invaders after invaders for 2000yrs none of the so called science techonology or arthasastra were helpful. So its all puranic gossips!
Chanakya is painted as a scheming manipulator who could stoop to even the meanest level to serve his purpose. Encyclopaedia Britannica reported that Chanakya or Kautilya (Artha -shastra) presented no overt philosophy. But implicit in its writings is a complete skepticism, if not cynicism, concerning human nature, its corruptibility, and the ways in which the ruler-and his trusted servant-can take advantage of such human weakness.
Chanakya openly advised the development of an elaborate spy system reaching into all levels of society and encourages political and secret assassination. So he is a treacherous murderor and morally corrupt.
Artha sastra was written after Guptas period when sanskrit borrowed the Nagari script of Dravidian Nagars. Chanakyan lived in 300 bc when there was no sanskrit script so Who wrote Arthasastra? Not Chanakyan. Although the book was considered to be lost for many centuries, a copy of it, written on palm leaves, was rediscovered in 1904 AD. No palm leaf manuscript can stand for 2100yrs . So arthasastra is a hoax or plagiarism like Sushurata and other sanskrit texts. According to KC Ojha, Vishnugupta was actually a redactor of Kautilya’s original work, which suggests that Kautilya and Vishnugupta are different people. full of puranic story of copying or plagiarism..shameful acts of whom?
Ki
Keep in English sir
Madam ji Hindi medium bhi hai
fucked up pronunciation !!
Thank you sir