1:11 - Motorcycle rider rule #19 - when you encounter a dangerous idiot on the road, you should always resort to road rage, and try to ride as close as possible to them in hopes that you can be intimidating. FYI, your bike vs a car isn't in any way close to giving them a taste of their own medicine, it's just you being stupid.
It's not A major accident, it's HER FIRST major accident... It's relative. Going off road and hitting things is "MAJOR" when you never add any accident before, beside a bump while parking.
1:42 ... Regardless of what the law says, you should probably stop before entering the road... you know... 'cause MAYBE you want to live to see tomorrow. I don't know...
MN Biking: Bicyclists operating a bicycle on a sidewalk or crosswalk have all the rights and duties of pedestrians. Make your intention to cross clear, make eye contact with the driver and ensure the driver is yielding the right-of-way to you before proceeding.
Assuming you are in an area that allows it. Some places the only legal way for a bike to be on a sidewalk is if the person is not on it and walking it.
@@Wolfshead009 Yeah, and although I respect the sidewalks "religiously" and leave the right of way to pedestrians, I'm always surprised (and the angry) to those "scooters-like" speeding to cross the road on a crosswalk, as if it was designed to allow «suddenly appearing vehicle at one inch in front of you while you drove through an "empty road" 2 seconds earlier»...
1:42 Yep, that's exactly how it works. Just full speed blast thru a 4-way stop. How embarrassing the guy in the van didn't see you coming and roll out the red carpet for you.
It's actually a three way stop, none of which was for the bicyclist. Had the van driver actually stopped at their stop sign and looked, they would have seen the bicyclist that had ROW.
@@elizabethbarnett4273 What are you talking about? No crosswalk has a stop sign for itself. They are always treated as so. Even in states [like there in Minnesota] that allow 'Idaho-stops' for cyclists [an idiotic practice that leads to these situations] the cyclist still must slow down, and stop if necessary. A car coming cammer's left (like the Explorer at 1:48) could already entered the intersection, and would have ROW over the cyclist. Minnesota 169.222 OPERATION OF BICYCLE; Subd. 4a.Stopping requirements. (a) For purposes of this subdivision, "in the vicinity" means located in an intersection or approaching an intersection in a manner that constitutes a hazard of collision during the time that a bicycle operator would occupy the intersection. (b) A bicycle operator who approaches a stop sign must slow to a speed that allows for stopping before entering the intersection or the nearest crosswalk. Notwithstanding subdivision 1 and section 169.06, subdivision 4, if there is not a vehicle in the vicinity, the operator may make a turn or proceed through the intersection without stopping. (c) Nothing in this subdivision alters the right-of-way requirements under section 169.20. The provisions under this subdivision do not apply when traffic is controlled by a peace officer or a person authorized to control traffic under section 169.06.
@@sdgvlkjnasdlfkjawlk Even in states that have yield-as-stop for cyclists like Minnesota, you are not allow to just enter an intersection at full speed. You must slow and be expected to stop if necessary, just the law. Had cammer done that, it would have been a non-issue.
1:39 still waiting for the "taste of his own medicine" part cause you wouldn't have been able to take him out at all. 3:01 that driver REALLY wanted that cash lane 5:23 well it was your fault 7:59 i'm surprised they didn't charge her with not wearing a seat belt too
6:10 I will never understand why roundabouts are so difficult for people to drive through. After watching all these vids it should be part of every driving test with an automatic fail if you screw it up.
So let me get this right: The guy on the motorcycle thought he was making the guy in the SUV believe the motorcycle was going to take him out? Seriously? 🤣
@1:11 "tried to take me out for no reason" says the guy that is speeding over 90mph on a motorcycle. Seriously dude...it's riders like YOU that make other drivers hate us! @5:14 How was the cammer deemed at fault when the other driver was backing out into an occupied roadway cutting off not one but two other vehicles?
#1 worn tires and engine torque. Back in the later 1980s, I drove my dad's ex-company car that he bought from the company, a 1979 Ford Fairmont. It had a V8 and was stock with 140 hp and 250 lb ft of torque, but it could get out of control taking simple left or right turns in the rain. Obviously the ute in the video has much more than 140 hp, but same effect, even with modern safety features built into modern cars.
5:25 what I find the most ridiculous about this is. Is if you hadn't swerved and hit the car while trying to stop the insurance company will use the lame excuse that you "didn't try to evade them" yet when you do just that, evade hitting the car, they then claim you are at fault....... Insurance companies need to be put in check. They have been allowed to over inflate costs while not providing the services one thinks they are paying for. It's complete bs. And I would most definitely appeal that decision and find another insurance company, not that any of them can be trusted, and talk to an attorney. Insurance companies can't have it both ways.
Being put at fault for an honest attempt to avoid a collision is ridiculous. Drivers are not highly trained to deal with this stuff, they can't be expected to react perfectly to every situation - the blame here surely should be on the person who created the danger.
The insurance is correct. Cammer wasn't paying attention, and had ample time to stop. She swerved her car off the road instead. That's HER fault. Drivers have a duty to avoid accidents. This could have easily been avoided had she not been playing on her phone (guaranteed). A blind person could have stopped in time.
@@sdgvlkjnasdlfkjawlk They were already halfway out when the cammer came along. Only an idiot wouldn't see them, hence why her own insurance put her at fault.
1:45: There are soman different regulations around the world, so here are my questions to someone who knows the area: Lokks like a walkway to me, is it actually a cycle path or a shared path? If so why isn't this signposted? Wouldn't a cyclist on a share path have to dismount or at least slow down to walking speed? Are the thick lines actually markers for vehicles to stop?
There's a stop sign for the vehicles. The thick lines are for the crosswalk and yes they have to stop and clear both the road and the multi-use path and crosswalk before proceeding. It is not required to dismount nor could I find any speed limits for bikes.
0:25 - Dude didn't just 'pop one of his tires' - he folded the entire wheel in! 5:16 - Insurance would, with no one else to blame. A - leaving the roadway. B - Striking a 'fixed' (sic) object. Those are two citations you should've gotten because you didn't just blast that dumb f* in the road. Next time stop if you can, but do NOT swerve. If you hit them, ohh well... At least you found them six months later and can sue, but good luck 'proving' it was them. 7:50 - Since they were charged that means they - somehow - survived. When they run like that, officer, your job is to ensure that they do NOT become a taxpayer burden... permanently.
the comment by the person on the motorbike HAHAHAHA yah you really showed him.... no matter the size or speed you are unprotected, like going into a fight with no armor STUPID
5:27 drivers if you could safely avoid an accident do it but in this case driver should have just maintained their lane while slamming on their brakes and hit that car that was crazy slowly reversing into the road (which by the way reversing into a road slowly that has constant traffic is just asking for an accident) because even if they are really at fault you driving off the road clears them by the standards of law and insurance so just get into that accident with the other person and let them pay to fix your car
There was a median cable-barrier and a solid guardrail upcoming. No traffic in the adjacent lanes, so this was an appropriate spot for a TVI. But I suppose your extensive background in police vehicle tactics makes you a subject-matter expert, so we should heed your internet wisdom........................
1:36 -- yeah, you can tell that he was absolutely terrified. 1:48 -- had to watch that again, it was so amusing. 5:08 -- what was that, Small Horn Syndrome? 5:53 -- I guess it's true, a kayak always goes back to upright!
@@ollie_ii No, you can drive safely in Arkansas, but remember to obey all traffic laws, especially those involving yielding to emergency vehicles. If a vehicle blows past you on the shoulder or right lane (if you're in the left), look in your rear-view for blue-lights and get over to the right. Clueless Oblivions are the greatest hazard on the roads of Arkansas.........................
@@karlbrundage7472 Yes you can drive safely and innocently until you meet a spinning airborne car coming at you because some jerk redneck cop needs to get his rocks off stopping a perp in crowded traffic.
What a terrible place for a PIT. Straight into the obvious barrier where it could have been yeeted into oncoming traffic at a combined speed of 150+mph.
4:18 Another fine example of why mistakes shouldn't be fixed by accelerating into them.. Yes, it's still the red SUVs fault, but it could've been avoided by just lifting off the gas.
@@carlrobert7860 What a fascinating take. The 'speeder' (who started off stationary and never was moving all that fast) caused it, not the person jumping a red light into the wrong lane.. You don't signal an evasive manoeuvre, either..
Agree, tried to same a second but ended up losing a whole lot more plus time to get the car repaired, time on the phone with the insurance company. Sucks to be him.
@@Monkeh616 Evasive action? But the suv wasn’t going fast…and based on how much the car jumped up, I’d say he was going a decent clip. That’s why he needed to take ‘evasive’ action.
Before crossing the street stop and look both directions make sure it's clear don't assume people can see you cuz you'll be dead cuz they didn't see you but they sure felt you under the tires
@1:03 if I witnessed that I immediately would've pitted them. The ONLY reason they did that was because they caused it and probably had no insurance or suspended license
First clip looks like a Holden Maloo, which has a whopping great V8 (6ltr?) at the front, not much weight at the back, and RWD. Add the application of a leaden right foot....
2:13 the one before this is killing me so bad im trying not to piss myself rn i cant even put the right tjme stamp cause j font wanna go back and see it again 😭😭😭
@5:29 Just hit the other car. I don't think that I would be able to react differently in the moment, either, but when it comes down to changing lanes or leaving the road and causing damage, you just have to hit the driver at fault.
It didn't seem careless, it was RECKLESS to pull that shit at that speed, in that location, and with that much traffic is around. Those Aspholes love showing up on video and don't give a shit about all the lives they endanger.
@@thomasfletcher760 No, there wasn't. There's one on the other side, which will neither prevent them hitting the rail end on sideways nor prevent a vehicle entering oncoming traffic lanes - just bring it back afterwards, hopefully without another vehicle attached..
There are videos out there showing more of that ASP pursuit that got the suspect ejected after the PIT maneuver sent the car onto the guardrails. It wasn't a pretty sight until they got back on the highway, and we saw the end.
So the last one, I wouldn't run from cops, but of ALL the states to run from cops, Arkansas is the absolute last one, hell would have to freeze over! They love their pit maneuvers!
5:29 major accident? You hit a plastic mailbox and there was no contact with the other driver because you panicked and drove into someone’s yard. That’s on you bud.
![ร้อยพ่อพันแม่ - WanMai [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XY2pNYASEbg/mqdefault.jpg)
Hello everyone!! Thank you for subscribing and watching my channel.
You can submit your dashcam videos here:
Email : rrbddrivingschool@gmail.com.
it was deftly a white cars only left turn lane. thanks for all the clips.
1:11 - Motorcycle rider rule #19 - when you encounter a dangerous idiot on the road, you should always resort to road rage, and try to ride as close as possible to them in hopes that you can be intimidating. FYI, your bike vs a car isn't in any way close to giving them a taste of their own medicine, it's just you being stupid.
And 90+mph is NOT legal.
The MOtorcycle rider is the Dangerous idiot doing 90+ which is Felony Speeding
.....& don't forget to carry your organ-donor card with you!
Especially when you are the dangerous idiot encounter...
They're like little yappy dogs that get stepped on.
You are on a bloody motorcycle going against a car. There is no "taste of their own medicine" 😂😂
7:03 _"They did finally turn into a gas station/store parking lot"_ to get more beer.
I was thinking the cammer should have been using his phone to call 911 instead of making video.
@@condorboss3339 it's a passenger filming. Still, the driver should have called 911
@@danielabackstrom No, the passenger, the driver shouldn't call anything.
I wanna know why we get a phone video when it's clear they have a dashcam
Clip 0:26 he didnt pop his tire he fuckin destroyed his whole axle 🧐🧐🧐
That was an expensive mistake
He did😂😂😂
Tore off the wheel, hub, strut, & suspension-arm! Didn't really need those after all!
They turned that car into a tri-pod.
Remember he still has time to use the insurance.
5:13 Hitting a mailbox is NOT a "major accident".
Depends if it's one of those mailboxes built by people tired of getting their mailbox taken out: ie. Solid steel post anchored in a ton of concrete.
@condorboss3339 blah! Blah! Blah! Would of... could of... should of...
@@Resist_Oppression You forgot to take your pills ?
It's not A major accident, it's HER FIRST major accident... It's relative. Going off road and hitting things is "MAJOR" when you never add any accident before, beside a bump while parking.
@@Resist_Oppression It's "Would have, could have, should have", my guy.
The last one they forgot to add littering and no seatbelt.
Littering and infrastructure damage was caused by police. So seatbelt only.
😂😂😂
1:42 ... Regardless of what the law says, you should probably stop before entering the road... you know... 'cause MAYBE you want to live to see tomorrow. I don't know...
I wondered how the cyclist was gonna somehow be blamed for the truck failing to ensure the way was clear.
So nice of the bicyclist to provide video evidence of his wrong doing.
@@ghost_stars2307 Cyclist is at fault and has a death wish.
@@ghost_stars2307 it's simple. the cyclist was on other side of the road with separator AND drove under moving car in clear space.
I ride 120mi/wk on average and I ALWAYS MAKE SURE ITS CLEAR AND PEOPLE ARE STOPPED. Personally, I'd let traffic go in this case.
5:34 entitled ebiker
7:58 If you are going to flee from the cops, then the least you can do is put on your damn seatbelt.
Nah. Leave it off. Better chance of a Darwin Award
Nice to see ASP tag teaming now with the PIT maneuvers. Looks like they are learning from past experiences.
Best advice for them is no seatbelts and no airbags
They forgot to add the charge of driving without a seatbelt.
Too bad the perp lived to probably steal another car.
0:41 Covering the license plate.
Damn criminals...
MN Biking: Bicyclists operating a bicycle on a sidewalk or crosswalk have all the rights and duties of pedestrians. Make your intention to cross clear, make eye contact with the driver and ensure the driver is yielding the right-of-way to you before proceeding.
Assuming you are in an area that allows it. Some places the only legal way for a bike to be on a sidewalk is if the person is not on it and walking it.
@@Wolfshead009 Yeah, and although I respect the sidewalks "religiously" and leave the right of way to pedestrians, I'm always surprised (and the angry) to those "scooters-like" speeding to cross the road on a crosswalk, as if it was designed to allow «suddenly appearing vehicle at one inch in front of you while you drove through an "empty road" 2 seconds earlier»...
@@Wolfshead009 It is in Australia.
@@Wolfshead009 That makes sense.
So they want to be treated like cars, but also want their own special rules? Cyclists are cancer
1:38 Be careful of the medicine you give out. The doctors might not be able to put you back together again.
2:00 Lady was not okay, as she shouldn't be behind the wheel driving that badly!
right??? and she was so close to doing it smoothly
Spicywolff, 13secs of solid horn work is both excessive and intimidatory. They were an idiot, but you were overly aggressive there....
💯
💯💯💯... as soon as other driver started backing up, there was no need for the horn... other than to be a doosh
1:42 Yep, that's exactly how it works. Just full speed blast thru a 4-way stop. How embarrassing the guy in the van didn't see you coming and roll out the red carpet for you.
It's actually a three way stop, none of which was for the bicyclist. Had the van driver actually stopped at their stop sign and looked, they would have seen the bicyclist that had ROW.
@@elizabethbarnett4273 What are you talking about? No crosswalk has a stop sign for itself. They are always treated as so. Even in states [like there in Minnesota] that allow 'Idaho-stops' for cyclists [an idiotic practice that leads to these situations] the cyclist still must slow down, and stop if necessary. A car coming cammer's left (like the Explorer at 1:48) could already entered the intersection, and would have ROW over the cyclist.
Minnesota 169.222 OPERATION OF BICYCLE;
Subd. 4a.Stopping requirements. (a) For purposes of this subdivision, "in the vicinity" means located in an intersection or approaching an intersection in a manner that constitutes a hazard of collision during the time that a bicycle operator would occupy the intersection.
(b) A bicycle operator who approaches a stop sign must slow to a speed that allows for stopping before entering the intersection or the nearest crosswalk. Notwithstanding subdivision 1 and section 169.06, subdivision 4, if there is not a vehicle in the vicinity, the operator may make a turn or proceed through the intersection without stopping.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision alters the right-of-way requirements under section 169.20. The provisions under this subdivision do not apply when traffic is controlled by a peace officer or a person authorized to control traffic under section 169.06.
0:24 popped a tire ???
Pretty sure I just saw half of his front axle dangling
1:45 maybe you should stop 🛑
Maybe, just maybe, THEY should have stopped for someone in the crosswalk.
@@sdgvlkjnasdlfkjawlk Even in states that have yield-as-stop for cyclists like Minnesota, you are not allow to just enter an intersection at full speed. You must slow and be expected to stop if necessary, just the law. Had cammer done that, it would have been a non-issue.
@@95mushroom He was on the sidewalk with all the rights of a pedestrian or other sidewalk user.
@@sdgvlkjnasdlfkjawlk And? Do pedestrians just blindly walk into unlight crossing? Or do they at least look first?
@@95mushroom He did look and he entered the crosswalk well before either the sedan or the van did.
1:39 still waiting for the "taste of his own medicine" part cause you wouldn't have been able to take him out at all.
3:01 that driver REALLY wanted that cash lane
5:23 well it was your fault
7:59 i'm surprised they didn't charge her with not wearing a seat belt too
6:10 I will never understand why roundabouts are so difficult for people to drive through. After watching all these vids it should be part of every driving test with an automatic fail if you screw it up.
1:36 A taste of his own medicine as in you then almost took yourself out by retaliating?
Agree. Doesn't matter if you''re right or wrong. The guy on the motorcycle is always going to come off worse in a collision.
1:40 dude is trying to get you to slow down before you kill yourself
Let him go ahead and do it...
So let me get this right: The guy on the motorcycle thought he was making the guy in the SUV believe the motorcycle was going to take him out? Seriously? 🤣
@@Duetmaster2 It looked like the biker was going to try to PIT the Expedition. Yeah, _that'll teach him!!_
1:46 are you supposed to be using crosswalk?
It's known as a crossbike.
In some states they can, but not when they have a red light or cross traffic stopped at a stop sign and it's their turn to go.
Supposed to be the safest place to cross.
This is a bike path within a park.
first one - crappy tires
Also crappy driver
@@condorboss3339 Mostly crappy driver...
Was going to say bald-tyres on an Aussie ute, .....but yes, have to agree about being a crappy driver!
@1:11 "tried to take me out for no reason" says the guy that is speeding over 90mph on a motorcycle. Seriously dude...it's riders like YOU that make other drivers hate us!
@5:14 How was the cammer deemed at fault when the other driver was backing out into an occupied roadway cutting off not one but two other vehicles?
So 90mph is a reason to take out a motorcyclist? Okay then...
@@sdgvlkjnasdlfkjawlk
I didn't say it was logical or legal...just the most likely reason the driver of the truck was thinking
1:44 This is why people hate bicyclists.
Because they can't drive?
Anyone driving that hate others should not be driving, they should learn how to control their emotions first.
5:17 dont try to brake at all just take out their mailbox
They'd rather break than brake 🤷♂️
Cammer avoided the car, but now they've got the USPS on their case
They did brake.
A taste of his own medicine? Ha.......you can't give him anything except matybe being thrown on his hood while loosing your life at the same time.
5:05 Forget the burp. What about the rude, unnecessary honking?? Clearly, the person heard you and was backing up so why continue???
Hey, I want one of those new super annoying Belch Horns!
0:31 that’s not a tire popping, that is the entire wheel assembly breaking off the vehicle.
#1 worn tires and engine torque. Back in the later 1980s, I drove my dad's ex-company car that he bought from the company, a 1979 Ford Fairmont. It had a V8 and was stock with 140 hp and 250 lb ft of torque, but it could get out of control taking simple left or right turns in the rain. Obviously the ute in the video has much more than 140 hp, but same effect, even with modern safety features built into modern cars.
1:48 i mean that's on you. You're supposed to get off of your bike and walk across the intersection. So that's one you buddy.
You're also supposed to stop at stop signs, not just slow down a bit..
Whether the local rules say you can ride over or not, he rode way too fast.
@@Monkeh616 ya but bike is supposed to slow down not just go into traffic as well. all parties there are in the wrong.
@@AudiaciousLife I said as much.
I couldn't find that law. Are you just making stuff up?
That's only the law in some places and Minnesota isn't one of them.
Holy hell a 120MPH pit...daaaaamn!
6:25 Say it with me... LANDSCAPE MODE
5:25 what I find the most ridiculous about this is. Is if you hadn't swerved and hit the car while trying to stop the insurance company will use the lame excuse that you "didn't try to evade them" yet when you do just that, evade hitting the car, they then claim you are at fault....... Insurance companies need to be put in check. They have been allowed to over inflate costs while not providing the services one thinks they are paying for. It's complete bs. And I would most definitely appeal that decision and find another insurance company, not that any of them can be trusted, and talk to an attorney. Insurance companies can't have it both ways.
Being put at fault for an honest attempt to avoid a collision is ridiculous. Drivers are not highly trained to deal with this stuff, they can't be expected to react perfectly to every situation - the blame here surely should be on the person who created the danger.
The insurance is correct. Cammer wasn't paying attention, and had ample time to stop. She swerved her car off the road instead. That's HER fault. Drivers have a duty to avoid accidents. This could have easily been avoided had she not been playing on her phone (guaranteed). A blind person could have stopped in time.
@@ihazdashcam A blind person could have seen the cammer and not backed across their path.
@@sdgvlkjnasdlfkjawlk They were already halfway out when the cammer came along. Only an idiot wouldn't see them, hence why her own insurance put her at fault.
@@ihazdashcam I see you're a glass half empty person. They were halfway IN.
1:38 Yes indeed. You showed him a thing or two about a thing or two. 🙄
1:11 doing 90 mph is very stupid. he was trying to get you to slow the hell down!!!
By side-swiping him?
1:45: There are soman different regulations around the world, so here are my questions to someone who knows the area:
Lokks like a walkway to me, is it actually a cycle path or a shared path? If so why isn't this signposted?
Wouldn't a cyclist on a share path have to dismount or at least slow down to walking speed?
Are the thick lines actually markers for vehicles to stop?
There's a stop sign for the vehicles. The thick lines are for the crosswalk and yes they have to stop and clear both the road and the multi-use path and crosswalk before proceeding.
It is not required to dismount nor could I find any speed limits for bikes.
2:13 & 2:33 When video gamers drive on the 'Real World' roads.
0:25 - Dude didn't just 'pop one of his tires' - he folded the entire wheel in!
5:16 - Insurance would, with no one else to blame. A - leaving the roadway. B - Striking a 'fixed' (sic) object. Those are two citations you should've gotten because you didn't just blast that dumb f* in the road. Next time stop if you can, but do NOT swerve. If you hit them, ohh well... At least you found them six months later and can sue, but good luck 'proving' it was them.
7:50 - Since they were charged that means they - somehow - survived. When they run like that, officer, your job is to ensure that they do NOT become a taxpayer burden... permanently.
the comment by the person on the motorbike HAHAHAHA yah you really showed him.... no matter the size or speed you are unprotected, like going into a fight with no armor STUPID
5:27 drivers if you could safely avoid an accident do it but in this case driver should have just maintained their lane while slamming on their brakes and hit that car that was crazy slowly reversing into the road (which by the way reversing into a road slowly that has constant traffic is just asking for an accident) because even if they are really at fault you driving off the road clears them by the standards of law and insurance so just get into that accident with the other person and let them pay to fix your car
1:42 isn’t that a crossWALK?
See above as it's part of a multipurpose path.
You could check the state laws instead of repeating that stupid non-argument.
Last clip: That highway was too busy to risk a pit maneuver
especially towards oncoming traffic
We just saw one where they waited a little to not hit the impact barriers either, that was so much better.
ASP waited until there were no cars next to her or in back of her. The one in front wasn't going to be involved no matter what. ASP did just fine.
There was a median cable-barrier and a solid guardrail upcoming. No traffic in the adjacent lanes, so this was an appropriate spot for a TVI.
But I suppose your extensive background in police vehicle tactics makes you a subject-matter expert, so we should heed your internet wisdom........................
It's ASP there's no restrictions on pits they did an awesome job too! Just like Georgia
5:15. Cammer should have hit the car, not the mailbox.
First clip: What caused the driver to do this? Stupidity, inexperience or both.
This accident highlights the importance of safe driving. We need to stay focused and avoid distractions
Gonna need you to be more specific.
Last video with ASP>. Well, that WAS a nice Lexus...
7:56 At least they did not have to order the driver to get out of the car.
1:36 -- yeah, you can tell that he was absolutely terrified. 1:48 -- had to watch that again, it was so amusing. 5:08 -- what was that, Small Horn Syndrome? 5:53 -- I guess it's true, a kayak always goes back to upright!
7:57 seeing alot of Arkansas police chases
The ol’ Arkansas Sunday drive is tradition.
Arkansas makes it uniquely easy to get free video from the state police, so everything that happens there ends up on TH-cam.
remind me to never drive in arkansas >_>
@@ollie_ii No, you can drive safely in Arkansas, but remember to obey all traffic laws, especially those involving yielding to emergency vehicles.
If a vehicle blows past you on the shoulder or right lane (if you're in the left), look in your rear-view for blue-lights and get over to the right.
Clueless Oblivions are the greatest hazard on the roads of Arkansas.........................
@@karlbrundage7472 Yes you can drive safely and innocently until you meet a spinning airborne car coming at you because some jerk redneck cop needs to get his rocks off stopping a perp in crowded traffic.
Gotta love those Arkansas PITs
@5:46 yes I saw that, you were left lane camping and the tire reminded you to get over 🙂
5:00 sorry for a burp but not a min long horn?! I don’t think you we’re preventing an accident so you can stop.
0:28 That is a bit more than a flat tire. They ripped the entire left front wheel, tire, hub, and brake assembly out of the car.
OMG 1st clip!!! ANZAC HWY!!! im there 3 times a week!!!!!!!! The Hungry Jacks at the corner lol
What a terrible place for a PIT. Straight into the obvious barrier where it could have been yeeted into oncoming traffic at a combined speed of 150+mph.
4:53 Cammer, don't be such a prong...sitting on the horn does nothing but make things worse.
Meh, it got the point across in that situation.
super dangerous pit , almost into oncoming traffic.
stupid move in heavy traffic.
2:15 youtuber trying to swim in a stolen car
I wouldn't be surprised if more than half of Arkansas' state spending went to repairing and replacing cruisers for their state police.
0:26 that front bumper kinda look already messed up lol.
4:18 Another fine example of why mistakes shouldn't be fixed by accelerating into them.. Yes, it's still the red SUVs fault, but it could've been avoided by just lifting off the gas.
Neither vehicle signalled to move to the left lane. Red truck turning right was an infraction but did not cause the accident. Speeder caused it.
@@carlrobert7860 What a fascinating take. The 'speeder' (who started off stationary and never was moving all that fast) caused it, not the person jumping a red light into the wrong lane..
You don't signal an evasive manoeuvre, either..
Agree, tried to same a second but ended up losing a whole lot more plus time to get the car repaired, time on the phone with the insurance company. Sucks to be him.
@@Monkeh616 Evasive action? But the suv wasn’t going fast…and based on how much the car jumped up, I’d say he was going a decent clip. That’s why he needed to take ‘evasive’ action.
@@carlrobert7860 The SUV pulling out slow would be causative, yes..
@0:26 didn’t pop the tire, ripped the whole wheel off!
5:22 time to change insurance companies
A STOP sign is a STOP sign, no matter what!
5:23 thats why you dont swerve and just hit the brakes and stay in your lane.
4:30,. Yep really proved his point.
How do you tell someone hasn't been paying attention to the world around them?
They attempt to flee from the Arkansas State Patrol.
Douche on a Motorbike gets his panties in a twist when the tables are turned and a car lane splits at high speed as payback.
4:06 That stop sign runner had to have been one distracted driver. The stop sign runner didn’t even slow down.
Before crossing the street stop and look both directions make sure it's clear don't assume people can see you cuz you'll be dead cuz they didn't see you but they sure felt you under the tires
5:30 ffs why would you report that to insurance??? those mailboxes are like $60 at lowes
Because the car needed repairs and they expected the insurance to fault the idiot pulling into traffic.
@5:10 you should've gotten off of the horn when they started backing up
1:03 CPT Hamstervan?!!! 😂
Rose Well yeah. You had more than enough time to stop. Guaranteed you were looking at your phone.
If more criminals watched the Arkansas State Police on here, I feel there would be less crime in Arkansas.
Love watching those guys pit the 'bad guys'. They don't mess about!
@@susandickens2340 Arkansas is the best place to FAFO. They will be delighted to show you.
I'm convinced that none of those people who run from the ASP have the internet. And being it's Arkansas, that's entirely plausible.
Reckless endangerment of the public. These cops should be fired. You don’t engage in a pursuit in trafic and you certainly don’t do a PIT maneuver.
Last one: how do you charge a dead person?
Dr Frankenstein just waited until there was a lightning storm . . .
Dont you love when motorcycles want to road rage with a car or truck? 😂😂 the car driver may go to jail for hitting you, but you’ll be dead
@1:03 if I witnessed that I immediately would've pitted them. The ONLY reason they did that was because they caused it and probably had no insurance or suspended license
HEY SLOPPYWOOF, they're moving relax. That crap attitude's gonna bite you someday.
Of course this wouldnt have been an rr&bd video with an ASP chase
First clip looks like a Holden Maloo, which has a whopping great V8 (6ltr?) at the front, not much weight at the back, and RWD. Add the application of a leaden right foot....
6:22 good point
2:13 the one before this is killing me so bad im trying not to piss myself rn i cant even put the right tjme stamp cause j font wanna go back and see it again 😭😭😭
CPT Hamstervan HILARE!
@5:29 Just hit the other car. I don't think that I would be able to react differently in the moment, either, but when it comes down to changing lanes or leaving the road and causing damage, you just have to hit the driver at fault.
804 to 2k! 🤠
5:50 🎵 Come sail away, come sail away, come sail away from me. 🎵
5:33 what a baby
Most americans
7:35 Trooper Amber Cass, that seemed careless to PIT that car *to the left* with that much oncoming traffic, and at the beginning of a guard rail.
There was a cable barrier before the guard rail
They just have to get there man you know, even though they had the plate number.
@@thomasfletcher760 A car can flip long and high at 117 MPH.
It didn't seem careless, it was RECKLESS to pull that shit at that speed, in that location, and with that much traffic is around. Those Aspholes love showing up on video and don't give a shit about all the lives they endanger.
@@thomasfletcher760 No, there wasn't. There's one on the other side, which will neither prevent them hitting the rail end on sideways nor prevent a vehicle entering oncoming traffic lanes - just bring it back afterwards, hopefully without another vehicle attached..
@2:26 Thats not a hit n run. The Camaro slid a few 100 feet due to going 90 and sliding on the grass.
nice video
00:17 Umm. Too much throttle, not enough experience.
There are videos out there showing more of that ASP pursuit that got the suspect ejected after the PIT maneuver sent the car onto the guardrails. It wasn't a pretty sight until they got back on the highway, and we saw the end.
Did any of those videos talk about wearing a seatbelt, or, maybe, not fleeing from police?
So the last one, I wouldn't run from cops, but of ALL the states to run from cops, Arkansas is the absolute last one, hell would have to freeze over! They love their pit maneuvers!
5:29 major accident? You hit a plastic mailbox and there was no contact with the other driver because you panicked and drove into someone’s yard. That’s on you bud.
I also use a hovering mailbox with no post for a driver to hit.
5:44 His god is a tire.
Most people here worship four of them. A few are so blinded by the light of 18 or more they can't see anything else.
@@Monkeh616 Four tires good. Two tires bad.
Ebike strikes again!
So, that last one, did the driver make it?
yes