Pat McKenna interview about the OJ Simpson murder case on The C.O.W.S.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2021
- #patmckenna #ojsimpson #truecrime #nicolebrownsimpson #rongoldman #markfuhrman
Pat McKenna discusses the OJ Simpson murder case and his involvement as a private investigator on The C.O.W.S. radio show hosted by Gus T. Renegade. This podcast does not belong to me.
![[Full Episode] MasterChef Junior Thailand มาสเตอร์เชฟ จูเนียร์ ประเทศไทย Season 3 Episode 7](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FOIiws4XMGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Pat McKenna needs to get on more podcasts STAT
I appreciate that the interviewer let McKenna speak without too many interruptions.
This great stuff. Pat McKenna needs more air time! F. Lee Bailey’s right hand man.
Oj's entire house inside and outside was IMMACULATE...Nothing out of place. Yet these pair of socks lying at the foot of his bed smh. Obviously planted. And they didn't find the blood on the socks until months later with EDTA. Our blood does not contain EDTA naturally so the logical conclusion is the blood came from the test tube.
Exactly. The socks appeared long after. A documentary film maker had video evidence that the socks were not there when he filmed but somehow they went back and found the socks. Those little fingernail specks of smeared blood was planted. Had OJ kill them, blood would’ve been saturated.
Crazier is that those socks weren't there in the initial video that LAPD took. LAPD would take a video before warrants on rich homes because they had issues with cops stealing...in that initial video, there weren't any socks. Prosecution argued that maybe the video was taken after the warrant.....
@@Meng776big lie
It’s not the only conclusion the blood came from the test tube, given that many foods and carbonated drinks contain EDTA as a preservative
@@Anita-ee4bsnot in as high a concentration as was found in the blood
So happy people who actually investigated this case and had an active hand in conducting keep sharing the truth. It is so irritating to hear folks who "just KNOW he did it" and refuse to review the facts that are so well documented.
Quat...he didn't do it 👀
Bobby Owens of course, he did NOT do it. Absolutely no way. All the liars & schemers will go 2 the deepest pits of hell where they all will repent & plead 4 mercy 4 the rest of their afterlives.
Wow! this is such a revealing interview.....I wonder why this perspective/theory was not given much credence.
Most White ppl are so confident in Police that they are pro-prosecution. They feel if the police arrested a suspect then they have done due diligence. They have no clue that police make arrests they rarely solve crimes. Their end goal is to arrest not prove someone is innocent. In America you are guilty until proven innocent. And even people who ARE guilty and serve their time they are forever guilty bc there is no such thing as paying your debt to society. They won't even hire ex-felons which should be ILLEGAL. OJ's case brought all of these issues to the forefront yet white america still chooses to ignore the issues. It's much easier to say OJ did it and those dumb black uneducated jurors got it wrong.
There's not a shed of this case that I haven't studied even though it's fool proof but AS USUAL it's all about racism. It's been a few minutes and I can't stomach the stupidity spewing from this episode.
Everyone felt that “something isn’t right” about Fuhrman. I was a kid but immediately felt that creepiness when he was on the stand.
Furman planted the glove at OJs house
One of the worst things I've heard during the trial from the media after the verdict was, well those black jurors wasn't going to convict OJ because they had to go back to their communities and live. And I was always yelling at my TV well what about the two white jurors on the jury. Since he's been found not guilty is nobody worried about them going back to their white communities. Won't they be ostracized by the white community for voting not guilty. OJ didn't commit those murders, but when I was hearing lawyers who were so called expert lawyers saying on TV saying that about the black jurors as if they couldn't have made an intelligent decision if they thought he was guilty so because they had to go back to their black communities they let a killer go free. These were lawyers saying this after the verdict. And it pissed me off, because that jury gave up 9 almost 10 months of their lives to serve on a jury and do their civic duty but lawyers were on TV trashing their decision because they didn't agree with it smh.
And they were upset because they came back with the verdict so quickly....they sat there for 10 months isolated from their families and friends while these lawyers did their little performances for the cameras. I would have done the same thing if I were on that jury. And ppl forget the jury didn't see and hear everything the world heard. They were totally unbiased imo
@@lisakaye3919 Exactly
One of the female white jurorists said should would have absolutely found him guilty if she got to do it over
dont forget the hispanic guy was on the jury too
Facts! Pat McKenna is the man.
And he's banging Casey Anthony. Interesting wouldnt you say?
@@Jim_Harwood - no he’s not , he’s in his 70’s.
This is one of the BEST podcasts I have ever enjoyed!
Why won't people look at both sides of the case?
Racism won't allow people to see both sides of the case.
Racist can't see both sides of the case.
I always thought that lying detective lied about alot more than just planting the glove.
Do you suspect he was involved in the murders?
@@mr_knowitall not sure. But I wouldn’t put it past him. There’s many many mark furmens in America. I’m glad that OJ had enough money to hire great lawyers, investigators, and scientist to help expose police corruption and prove his innocence. Most of us don’t have those resources, so no one would ever believe that we were lied on and framed by the police.
what about mark furhman does he have an alibi where he was on the night of the murders??? why did he take the 5th? shows he is hiding something!!
I love Pat McKenna. He's unapologetic. He will argue you down about OJ'S guilt because he put In the work. I feel sorry for the Brown's and Goldman's loss but if the man's innocent he's innocent. He went on Kim Goldman's podcast and stayed true where as lon Cryer and Don Aldana folded. Even Scheck has since folded
They destroyed his life and career.
@@wordtruth6116it isn’t right
Barry Scheck has folded? Where? When? Who caused him to fold?
In the prelim hearing, Mark Furman testified that he saw “them” (referring to two gloves). Then during the trial when he was asked about again, he changed his testimony.. Bailey caught him in the lie.
I would love to see a JFK type movie that focuses on Pats OJ investigation
Everyone overlooks all the deep connections to Scientology and the Tate murder case from 25 years earlier. Marsha Clark for example had been married to a high ranking Scientologist while the defendant OJ Simpson also belonged to the Church at one time. Charles Manson had also been a Scientologist.
OJ is innocent
Look up the similarities of the Tate murders 1969 and the Simpson murders in 1996 you will get goosebumps 😊
@@Louis-gu3ke Thanks. In the Tate case there was connections to Scientology and the Process Church of the Final Judgement and in the Simpson case we see Scientology again (Marcia Clark, OJ Simpson, Greta Van Susteren) and we see the old hacks from the Manson trial--Vince Bugliosi , Ira Reiner and even talk show host Charles Groden who was an anti Simpson mouthpiece had portrayed a doctor in the 1968 Roman Polanski movie Rosemary's Baby.
Solid George Floyd metaphor Mr. McKenna!! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
R.I.P. to Mr. F Lee Baily!!
#juicesjusticeleague
George Floyd pistol whipped a pregnant woman and broke out of prison. Oj is just a man who was convicted of murder.
Furhman also had a friendship with Nicole that was never brought into testimony. They were friends
OJ maybe an a hole and not a very nice person. Personally I never liked him but after watching the entire case I was convinced he did not kill these people. He is just didn’t have time or skill to kill two people and still go golfing in Chicago. Things just didn’t add up.
No way. It’s literally impossible. Watch the new documentary by Norman Prado
exactly!! the prosecution made it seem like it happened so fast!!
Serial killer Glen Rogers had been working for and partying with Nicole. He admitted to killing them.
I was really young when the murder happened and I honestly don’t know who did it but this is interesting
Things that the prosecution never tried to investigate or prove.
If the bronco was not parked out on Rockingham, when Simpson was getting in the limo, then parked it on OJ flew to Chicago and before the detectives arrived at O’Jays residence? This is something the prosecution never considered.
The cut on O’Jays middle finger on his left hand was so small its impossible for that cut to drip all that blood droplets the LAPD claimed. They found Bundy and Rockingham. You can tell by looking at that cut that that was not from a knife blade that was razor sharp. You can see the cut has some jagged edges in it and are so thin Which in fact comes from getting cut by glass. In fact, O.J. cut his own finger on the murder weapon. It would in fact opened up the wound to the thickness of the blade. He also would’ve needed stitches.
If OJ did not park the bronco outside as residence, how did he drip blood from the back of where the bronco was parked through the Rockingham gate and down his driveway? And why didn’t he drip blood inside his house on the carpet if he in fact was the dark figure who Allen Park witnessed walk in the house?
Oj did not kill Ron Goldman. If OJ in fact had killed Ron Goldman O.J. would have had a swollen face from getting punched by Ron. The prosecution claims that Ron’s had many defensive wounds on his hands and arms as we can see in the photos. However, if you look at the defensive wounds on Ron he has rounded - like gouges on all 4 of his knuckles. Those gouges did not come from hitting another human being in the cranium and, or face region. That’s impossible because OJ would have suffered similar damage to his own head and face. The scraps on Ron’s hands came from him tussling around in the dirt and tile area, most likely punches that missed the assailant(s) face and skimmed a rougher surface like the ground or trees. That just doesn’t happen with someone’s knuckles in a bare knuckle street fight unless they skimmed concrete, brick, and or asphalt of some type.
The Bruno Molly shoes. The prosecution could approve that O.J. in fact owned a pair of those shoes. They tried to use photos of Simpson, wearing some type of dress shoe to prove their point, but they never could in fact prove that he owned a specific pair that match the impressions at the crime scene. The prosecution acts like OJ is the only one in the entire world that owned a pair of Bruno Molly shoes in California. And why didn’t the prosecution introduce the other footprint that was found at the Bundy scene that was a size 10 1/2 with a completely different impression pattern?
One of the topics at the LAPD, corners office and prosecution completely. We’re not experienced in was the understanding of sudden death combat and how it relates to edge weapons (knives). How the murders took place, who was killed first, why didn’t anyone here the victims screaming, the use of one knife or two, how it was held, and more.
Fuhrman has prior incidents of planting evidence? I can find nothing about that online.
Joseph Britton. I'm not 100% sure about the facts but pretty sure he accused him of planting a knife on him after he shot him. Also accused either him, or his partner, of yelling out the n-word before the shooting.
LAPD Police watch official at the time said the amount of complaints and grievances against Fuhrman was, and is, unheard of..
It was in his LAPD internal affairs records and the harassment he put toAndrew Purdy sticking a swatzika his locker because he married a Jewish woman
Yeah unfortunately he did. And everything involving law can't be ascertain through Google my friend. Money has even been given to Furhman victims. That guy was brutal and even talked about beating Black women amd how much he hated jews.
@@Ken-iu2zp wow. duh. And everything involving law can't be ascertain through Google my friend
@@Ken-iu2zp where do you get your information re: fuhrman?
Loved the juice when I was a kid read/watched just about everything on this case over the years and I’ve always been open to every theory I’ve heard of. One thing that I don’t understand are OJ’s actions after the murders occurred after the police questioned him.
[im not all in on OJ being the murderer nor am I all in on OJ being innocent]
When he was staying at R Kardashians house; If you were innocent, why would you want to kill yourself? Anyone else would do everything they could to let everyone know that they were in fact innocent. Instead he told AC to drive him to Nicole’s grave so he could kill himself there. He couldn’t drive up to the cemetery because they had quite a few police officers there. He was on the phone telling Tom Lange he was going to kill himself.
At that point a lot of people were pointing the finger at OJ and he was informed of the blood evidence tying him to both scenes. If he didn’t do it, and everyone’s telling him he did it, that could possibly drive someone crazy enough to act like that.
So at that point, He could be thinking everyone thinks I did it so it doesn’t matter anymore I’m done anyways.
But I’ve always thought someone else could have done it but he was there and possibly intervened at some point. Or someone told him what happened and he drove over to the scene.
He was always rolling by Nicole’s house to see if she was home and with somebody, maybe he just happened to come by during the struggle and the reason he hasn’t said anything was because he told someone to go over there.
Anything could have happened but he had to have been there regardless.
Why does it matter if he’s white? The question was incoherent and not relatable. Mr. McKenna’s race religion is not and was not on trial and he’s already addressed. I’m logging off now bc of the female call. Great show. I’m happy I caught it.
That's normally the first question he asks for anyone who's a guest on the program. Racial classifications are confusing. Gus goes by the logic, your either white or non-white. So it's mainly for clarity. Examples like Hispanic or Mexican are not racial classifications.
Oj cut his hand before before Chicago
She was killed by drug dealers. RIP
Pure speculation. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest that
@@iPro3million th-cam.com/video/XP4CwqiO9cQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=33DjwDqavF4t3oHe
@@iPro3million th-cam.com/video/XP4CwqiO9cQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=33DjwDqavF4t3oHe
@@iPro3millionexplain the Columbian necktie
@@kelvinbarber1765 OJ cut her throat from behind. It’s not rocket science fella
Is this the guy who was with Casey Anthony after her release? If so I wouldn’t give his video the time of day
Yes!
What about Furhman??
I wish Gus would engage the caller a bit more instead the long dead air. It’s weird
Why does it matter if he’s white. This is weird
After 10 months sequestered I would have my opinion formed and got out from there too
Someone was behind Kato's room right after the murder, who was that if not oj. We would have to believe that was not in any way connected to the murder. Clearly this was not Furman at 1050
where was furman that night? he doesnt have an alibi. i believe furman was there that night behind OJ house framing him up for the murders. remember kato said he heard thumps by the wall the picture moved. also rosa the maid heard two men arguing by OJ mansion and OJ had already left to chicago. who were the men she heard arguing??? posibly brad roberts and mark furhman. did you know robert k was at OJ mansion when oj had already left to chicago?
Mark Furman
it was mark furhman he has no alibi for the night of june 12
Why would someone run into an AC three times?
The most startling video of it all:
m.th-cam.com/video/FkegUenfmso/w-d-xo.html
Could you have gotten a better English speaker to give opinions.
OJ was there. But he did not commit the crime. Glen did, possibly paid off by Kardasian Kardasian was still angry about OJ’s fling with his X.
Interesting
Impossible because Rogers was in jail at the time of the killings
49:50
Lang seeing Nicole having a confrontation with the real killers and STILL thinking OJ did it is a testament to how much the media can manipulate people into believing anything.
When will I be allowed to remove my mask 😂
Not only did OJ did not have the time to do this, but even if he tried to do this within that short time frame, you’d have to be so lucky to have everything worked perfectly. Meaning you couldn’t get one red light driving back to Rockingham, what if he would’ve gotten beat up by Ron Goldman there are so many things that would have to perfectly planned for him to pull this off in that timeframe
The argument now is that the Bruno magli footprint proves oj was guilty. A saw an article in some major media source I don't remember which one, with a writer conclusively stating oj is guilty due to the footprint
Of coarse oj did it
Doesn't Casey Anthony work for this guy?
He sure does. And that's what makes people go "WTF", but then again, who knows what happened with that C.A. case, regardless of the tidbits we do know. I do believe that OJ isn't guilt of the crimes based on everything I've read and heard (outside of mainstream media).
Casey Anthony actually lives with him! He’s basically became Casey’s father, she’s lived with him since 2011
Casey Anthony is blowing him. OJ told me
It always make me laugh that there are still people saying OJ Simpson is innocent. At this point I just want to say to them "Give it up." You can't even call the OJ Simpson case a whodunit. A whodunit means the evidence points to more than one suspect. In the Simpson case not a shred of evidence points to anyone person except OJ SImpson.
Seeing this OJ case had no eye witness, no murder weapon and a general lack of time to commit the crimes not to mention Simpson was acquitted by the jury in less than 4 hours your post stands out as the idiot post of the year.
It would depend on who is pointing the finger, and in this case that finger belong to Mark Fuhrman . Collector of Nazi memorabilia and was forced to plead the fifth and was found guilty of perjuring himself during the trial.
@@suburbiajones2268 I believe Fuhrman agreed to the charge of perjury so he was the only person to be convicted of a felony in this case. During this interview Pat McKenna talks about LAPD's Dr. Golden who stated under oath during the grand jury hearing that two knives could have been used in the commission of the two murders. That's why he didn't testify in the trial and instead he was replaced by his boss. Essentially "hearsay" testimony regarding the autopsy !!!! And if you fast forward to the civil trial, OJ Simpson and his lawyers petitioned the court to get access to Judytha Browns phone records as it would have shown Nicole was alive while Simpson was in the airplane to Chicago. The court actually ruled against Simpson and placed Judytha Brown's phone record under control of LAPD prosecutor William Hodgeman! So people ought force Hodgeman / LA DA's office to release the phone record.
@@Jim_Harwood Everything you said so far is a fact.
@@Jim_Harwood Exactly. They have a lot to hide as evidence points away from Simpson. They whole case was a media sham . The phone records show these murders happened later than what they are stating . Remember the ice cream that was partially melted too. That shows it was later than so called timeline of 10:15-20 pm
Furhman also had a friendship with Nicole that was never brought into testimony. They were friends