REPORTER: In this officer’s case you have three people who were sober and arrested for dui. So what does that tell you? CHIEF: It doesn’t necessarily tell me anything. 🤦♂️ 🙄
Think about how sad it is that he had to go out and apologize for this officer rather than the officer being in the interview. It's like having your mom talk to the teacher for you
Agreed, listen to his excuse that only a blood draw can tell if they are impaired. Kidnapping and drawing blood should be grounds for prison for the cop.
I disagree, its not a training issue. The problem is the system is meant to be subjective. It's meant to give the officers evidence of impairment whether you are intoxicated or not. One of the few true things he said is that theres nothing he can do because the system is beyond him. There's no alternate.
Military veteran gun rights are being eternally abrogated based on FRAUDULENT DUI arrests! America's system of dirty cops to disarm veterans can go to hell ...! - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)
A lot of-this is about the character of the recruitments to be cops. Protect and serve is ignored and too many seem to have the thug mentality, looking at the public as criminals, that almost seems to be prerequisite and encouraged as the lack of accountability in many cases shows. We all know that in cases where citizens perform same crimes they would face life changing criminal punishments; cops with qualified immunity frequently get away with paid vacations, ready to find employment in neighbouring counties.
Civil Rights are a myth that most of the population has been fooled into believing. The U.S. has always been ruled by the biggest fist with brute force... words come only after the violence is finished.
Chief Goodwin stated that the officer arresting not just 1, but 3 sober drivers “doesn’t tell me anything”. That explains the root of the problem right there.
it tells the chief that you have an officer who violates the law to defend the law. this officer will imprison an innocent person and has done so with a pattern. this chief is protecting a Revenue generator. imagine how many other dui charges this sovereign citizen terrorist in uniform had before this investigation.
@@davidgiles4681 They are the Blue Line Cartel. Obey unconditionally, without Question or Hesitation or face shooting, arrest and beaten. Blue Line Cartel Policing while Afraid, is the most dangerous situation a citizen can face.
IMHO, the bulk of the fault falls on the officer's department/police chief for not providing the officer (and others from that PD) with breathalyzers. The chief's lame response to the reporter's question as to why the dept. doesn't use breathalyzers was complete malarkey to me.
@@VelocityOfAFallingRock It is odd because that same excuse could also apply to the walking in a line and all that. Some people can be massively drunk and still walk a straight line, "functional drunks" do exist. Saying there are ways to get around it is a poor excuse to not use one of them. Plus it's also a bit discriminatory against people. If your not in good health, as that Teacher looked over weight standing on one leg is not easy. Especially if you been on your feet all day working or are other wise tired. Never mind people with actual physical disabilities or medical conditions. Lets be honest almost the entire DUI system really doesn't work on anything more than "The cop feels like your drunk".
@@JustaGuy_Gaming Agreed. Conducting sobriety checks and arresting people on suspicion of drunk driving without utilizing breathalyzers is substandard to say the least.
It makes no sense for the state to do the tests if a hospital drew the blood. Almost every hospital has a blood lab that can run basic tests and if they don't the send it to another hospital that can or to an outside lab. In most cases somebody's blood work results should be back that night or the next day. No longer than a week. It is crazy one person waited 8 months to get the results back.
Why can't they just use a breathalyser instead of all the unnecessary polava that is totally subjective? RBTs make way more sense. And take way less time.
Teachers create next generation a better generation and they have to drive Uber after work? It’s is sin and shame on education department. If we stop corruption and stop funding wars our middle class will never have to struggle like this.
Even after the cop lied on his police reports that there were multiple signs these people were intoxicated the chief doesnt see a problem. I hope the Mayor gets a hold of this and fire him...
This happens more often than you think. It happened to me. Even after I blew a 0.00 on the breathalyzer. He said I failed the road side test. The DA dropped the case at my court hearing, but I still spent a day in jail when I got arrested and had my car towed at my expense
@@la7era1u54 did you have a traffic infraction? Where did that happen? Happened to me too. Cops where I lived lock people up for reporting drug trafficking. One lady, elderly, they kept in jail for 6 months for reporting drug trafficking. By the time she got out the homeowners association had sold her condo so she was homeless. Cathedral City, California
@@la7era1u54refuse the roadside test always. It’s subjective. Accept the breath test and if arrested the blood test. But sober or drunk the field side test does zero to help you and can only hurt you.
I mean all cops are like that LoL. But I'm willing to let the guy slide on the one where the person had an OPEN Beer Can in his car, that's kinda.... dumb on his part for riding around like that.
Rail on California all you want, but here, a breathalyzer is done before handcuffs and a blood test is completed that day for drugs. The police would be sued so hard here for that lol
"I'm not sure how I fix this, do I give him a raise? A promotion? Paid vacation? This is really concerning and I can't do a single thing about it" ~the man who can do anything about it.
@@shahtajali6321 Indeed, it's impossible. It's a subjective test and it is observed and analyzed by a cop who already thinks you're drunk and is looking for justification to arrest you. It's a roadside kangaroo court. So I always advise: *Never agree to do a field sobriety test.* They are optional. You are not required to perform them. Some people mistakenly think that your driver's license will be suspended if you refuse to do an FST. That is not true. The 5th amendment protects your right not to be a witness against yourself. Breathalyzers are different. A breathalyzer -- whether the portable handheld kind or the offical desktop machine back at the police station -- merely analyzes your breath. It doesn't require you to perform a gymnastics routine. So the 5th amendment protection against self-incrimination doesn't apply. But even so, in most states* you can refuse those, too. (I'm talking about the handheld portable ones that the cops use to determine if there is probable cause to arrest you. They are not as accurate and reliable as the full-size devices at the police station that provide the offical breath alcohol analysis.) If the cop lawfully determines there is probable cause to arrest you, then you will be taken to the police station to blow into the official desktop machine. That one you DO have to blow into. But in most states* you are not required to blow into the portable handheld device at the side of the road. (Although if you're completely sober, you may as well go ahead and do it. Unlike a subjective field sobriety test, a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) is a nonhuman machine that isn't looking for an excuse to arrest you.) (Assuming it's working properly.) TL;DR: You must never, under any circumstances, no matter how sober you are, perform a field sobriety test! They're not legally required and they're impossible to pass. ______________________ There are eight states in which you *_can_* be punished for refusing the roadside portable breathalyzer: Alaska Nevada Michigan New York Montana North Dakota Nebraska Rhode Island and Indiana, *_if_* you're involved in a fatal accident.
@@shahtajali6321 This is interesting. I posted a lengthy, informative reply to your comment, and TH-cam deleted it. Without notice, and for no reason. 😠 All right; I'll try again.... @shahtajali6321 Indeed, it's impossible. The field sobriety test is a subjective test and it is observed and analyzed by a cop who already thinks you're drunk and is looking for justification to arrest you. It's a roadside kangaroo court. So I always advise: *Never agree to do a field sobriety test.* They are optional. You are not required to perform them. Some people mistakenly think that your driver's license will be suspended if you refuse to do an FST. That is not true. The 5th amendment protects your right not to be a witness against yourself. Breathalyzers are different. A breathalyzer -- whether the portable handheld kind or the offical desktop machine back at the police station -- merely analyzes your breath. It doesn't require you to perform a gymnastics routine. So the 5th amendment protection against self-incrimination doesn't apply. But even so, in most states* you can refuse those, too. (I'm talking about the handheld portable ones that the cops use to determine if there is probable cause to arrest you. They are not as accurate and reliable as the full-size devices at the police station that provide the offical breath alcohol analysis.) If the cop lawfully determines there is probable cause to arrest you, then you will be taken to the police station to blow into the official desktop machine. That one you DO have to blow into. But in most states* you are not required to blow into the portable handheld device at the side of the road. (Although if you're completely sober, you may as well go ahead and do it. Unlike a subjective field sobriety test, a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) is a nonhuman machine that isn't looking for an excuse to arrest you.) (Assuming it's working properly.) TL;DR: You must never, under any circumstances, no matter how sober you are, perform a field sobriety test! They're not legally required and they're impossible to pass. ______________________ There are eight states in which you *_can_* be punished for refusing the roadside portable breathalyzer: Alaska Nevada Michigan New York Montana North Dakota Nebraska Rhode Island and Indiana, *_if_* you're involved in a fatal accident.
The three people will have to jump hurdles to get their license back due to the license being suspended for dui! I think that the officer should be charged with multiple charges and have to pay those people and their attorneys!
A lot of-this is about the character of the recruitments to be cops. Protect and serve is ignored and too many seem to have the thug mentality, looking at the public as criminals, that almost seems to be prerequisite and encouraged as the lack of accountability in many cases shows. We all know that in cases where citizens perform same crimes they would face life changing criminal punishments; cops with qualified immunity frequently get away with paid vacations, ready to find employment in neighbouring counties.
@@jayf8308 He's a cop. They are almost all criminal abusers with no regard for honest citizens. If the Chief cared he would have fired that officer. They only pretend to care when they get caught because of lawsuits.
This is why their cameras need to be used for supervision in the moment rather than waiting til he's in court before the truth is out. Cops like this can be blamed on their boss and their poor training. This should never happen.
change the word cop's to something else, like a race, or religion, or immigration status, the country of origin to the most likely perpetrator of crime in paris, Talk about it all.
@@robertruge2916 .08 is absolutely ridiculous. A beer and a. Shot with sinner and youre going to jail if youre pulled over. I'm not advocating for drinking and driving but lets be real here. I see videos on here all the time saying someone is twice the legal limit and act like they're absolutely hammered. I dont know many if any people that get sloshed off 4 beers.
These are TACTICS TO GET EVERYONES DNA! Cops have become Americas BIGGEST DISGRACE! Traitors of every soldier that ever served, fought and even DIED FOR OUR FREEDOMS!
1) if police chief doesn't know how to correct this simple problem, he's got NO BUSINESS being police chief. 2) Physical sobriety tests are a joke. If airports can swipe your hands abd detect drugs within seconds, don't BS us about time issues!
A lot of-this is about the character of the recruitments to be cops. Protect and serve is ignored and too many seem to have the thug mentality, looking at the public as criminals, that almost seems to be prerequisite and encouraged as the lack of accountability in many cases shows. We all know that in cases where citizens perform same crimes they would face life changing criminal punishments; cops with qualified immunity frequently get away with paid vacations, ready to find employment in neighbouring counties.
These cops want to make brownie points to help their careers off of DUI arrests and they don’t even seem to care that they are ruining innocent people’s lives.
Why police unions protect only dirty cops? Why did they not protect Cariol Horne and Christopher Dorner who were good cops? Also, why those union do not lobby the law: former cops should be imprisoned separately from the civilians like in Russia and Europe?
You avoid it by telling every idiot that votes Republican and every idiot that votes for a Democrat that acts like a Republican to stop being scumbags and actually elect honest politicians that will hold them accountable otherwise NOTHING WILL CHANGE
Wouldn't that be awesome.. meanwhile back in the reality of the police state in which we live.. the chief will continue full speed ahead with the raking in of dollars in the how many sheeple can we fleece today game.
@@johnforster4023clues of poor coordination and poor physical fitness are not signs of impairment. If you are a cop, then you should know better. Any cop, with any common sense can absolutely tell the difference.
Very cavalier in ruining innocent people's lives. It takes $5k to $10k in legal fees and fines, mandatory 48 hrs in jail, explain that to your boss, lose your license, potentially lose your job, get dropped from your insurance, strain on your family.
Plus OVIs are always on your record. It will never be removed. Pretty much barred from any driving job for life, which in this age is extremely limiting. They also don't talk about how much of the world you are banned from with an OVI charge. Can't go to Canada, UK, Mexico, Australia, and many many more. All so a corrupt cop can get a few buck and some compliments from his fellow cronies. Cops are evil, evil "people".
I'm going to guess this officer was a MADD award recipient; they receive awards only for arrests, not convictions. When you incentivize this conduct, its not surprising the end result, innocent people are victimized. If the department actually cared, they would have done something about it the first time it happened, not the 3rd time and when it became public.
It's been more than three and a half years. I am still legally unable to drive and they have still not ever tested my bloodwork. What the fuck am I supposed to do? Permanently remain legally unable to drive my own vehicle? After soooo long I am on the verge of violence, EVERY part of the system I contact reroutes me to another part and they have been spinning in in circles for ALMOST FOUR YEARS, HOW IS IT MY FAULT IF I GET VIOLENT OVER MY LIVELIHOOD BLATANTLY BEING HELD HOSTAGE OVER BLOOD SO OLD THAT IT IS NO LONGER VIABLE FOR TESTING GODDAMN EVEN THE TWO FAMILY-FRIEND LAWYERS WOULDN'T ADVISE ME SO I AM ABOUT TO START GIVING THE ADVICE OUT MYSELF WITH SOME HEAVY MACHINERY BITCH I AM *TIRED OF IT* DAMN
@@leelaural Mother's Against Drunk Drivers has an annual award (for arrest not convictions). Individual police departments have promotions and bonuses (arrest not convictions). Etc., etc..
@@mtw1234, The LAW get 40% percent of their pay check from Tax payers The other 60 % percent is from speeding tickets, drug busts, DUI/ DWI stops and WARRENTS THESE P1GS WANT PAID !
The reporter says ""Police can't take the risk of not arresting someone."" What a bonehead statement. He needs to be stopped and arrested for stupidity.
💯 exactly. He's part of the problem. What do you mean they can't afford not to arrest? They can afford to observe anyone and see if they're actually impaired... They can afford to take a breathalyzer. They can afford to wait for the lab results before charging. As they do to their own when drunk, they can afford to drive them home. What they can't afford is accountability. Fire and charge the officer. You have to ask what was even the reason for the stop because these guys were sober was there even a traffic violation. That's not a training issue, that's a systemic issue.
people need to look into mothers against drunk driving MADD they give awards $$$ to officers for DUI arrest even if the person has found innocent so they’re actually incentivized to get arrested cause they get money for it which is so wrong
The sobriety test isn't accurate. A cop pulled me over and asked if I could say the alphabet backwards, I asked him the same question and he said no. It's a stupid test 🙄
@@Witzer0616 You can find body cam videos of officers asking people to do this occasionally. From what I've heard, some cops use it as a stalling tactic to get a drug dog to the scene before being required to release someone.
Cops aren't qualified to administer the tests anyway. The tests aren't designed to prove a citizen is innocent. They're designed to give cops more information to justify their decision to arrest you.
I've always said, if you as a person want a job where you can pull people over, write them tickets,often frivolously, and have the ability to handcuff and put a person in jail, you are probably the kind of person who should not be a cop.
They are like the playleaders that back in the days were tasked to take care of the smaller ones in elementary on the playground. Except they are grown.
there is nothing to fix, if someone is too dumb to complete field sobrierity test when SOBER, then it means driver is unsafe to drive on roads. how would you react if one of those sober, yet impaired drivers would crash into YOUR car? and as result you'd sustain serious injuries .. then you'd be whining "why aren't cops doing their job and removing such impaired drivers from the roads? FIRE THEM ALL!" problem is that you're not using common sense, because you don't have any.
This is why you never submit to field sobriety tests. There is no state in the United States that penalizes you for refusing field sobriety tests. If they think you are drunk, this forces their hand and then they have to bring you down for a breathalyzer.
This is crazy and obviously they are corrupt, but the one person shouldn’t have had a half full open container in the car. What is one supposed to think?
Have the arresting officer get a $5,000 fine for every False Arrests, and $10,000 fee to the Falsely Arresting Police Department. This $15K will then be awarded to the victims of this Criminal Money Making Scam... and watch how fast this corruption ends.
Either would I, lots of back surgery, ortho issues… I wouldn’t even let them give me the test… I know I would look like I’ve been drinking… and I don’t drink.
This teacher wasn't even worried about the arrest, he was worried about his students by asking to make a call to the school to arrange a substitute for the day. I hope he sues and wins every dollar he deserves, this is just sad. Your students are blessed to have you as their teacher 💙
Remember The citizens of that community are victims too- without notice,The insurance bill goes way up for the town when these three sad cases are adjudicated and settlements paid.It's NEVER coming out of a cop's paycheck.Why? Qualified immunity
Chief doesn’t know how to fix it? Really? Then why is he police chief? Very simple. Fire the ignorant abusive criminal, masquerading as a LEO. Then tell every other officer in the department that they will be fired if they do the same thing.
It's an evidence gathering exercise more than anything. When they say "I need to make sure you're okay to drive" it's a lie. "I want to trick you into giving me more things to use against you" is more like it.
About 14 years ago, a police captain and I were having a drink and he tells me: “Know why sh!t like this happens? The cops know yours not drunk or whatever, but in the amount of time it’ll take to prove your innocence, the officer will have gone to court and gotten his overtime hours off of your misery”… Let that sink in
Fascinating. Cops pulled this scam on me. Put me in shackles and chains. Put my dog in the shelter actually up for adoption. Threw me in jail. Towed my vehicle. Had zero traffic infraction and no alcohol or drugs whatsoever. 0:0 These freaks wanted me to sign that I wouldn't sue I said no way Then they used a helicopter over my house hovering above looking inside my house which had walls of glass to torment me. They dumped Morgellons disease on my house and on the property basically destroyed my health. These cops are insane pumped up with steroids and a menace to the community. Palm Desert California Pure evil Yes I left the area The stories I could tell Bone chilling
100% agree, you can get a blood test at a hospital in a few days...let TBI validate the blood test if need be but waiting months almost a year for results is crazy while people suffer the consequences of being falsely accused.
Thank God here in North Carolina we can legally refuse to do field sobriety tests without consequence (but will lose your license for 1 year if you refuse a breathalyzer). I tell all the drivers I know that if they ever get suspected of drinking to refuse to do any field sobriety tests and offer to do a breathalyzer test instead.
@user-sf7kl9uh7k I believe in the majority of the states you can legally refuse very biased and subjective field sobriety tests, but not breathalyzers. This gives you more of a legal footing if arrested falsely.
@@ChrisPatrick-q6k you'll also be arrested if you "fail" their subjective field sobriety test when you haven't had a drop of alcohol. I'll take my chances with the breathalyzers or BAC test.
in most states, you can refuse the roadside tests as they are extremely subjective. fewer states allow you to refuse the roadside breathalyzer, mostly in states where those are not admissible in court. generally it requires the blood test to be admissible in court, or the breathalyzer they use at the station, not roadside. look up the rules for your own state as to what you can refuse. you would be surprised in most cases.
It also proves without a reasonable doubt that the field sobriety test is completely subjective, inaccurate, and should be removed and not applicable in court
I agree, just like hearsay. Anything subjective should not be admissible in court because cops are pathological liars, drunk with their perceived authority
I walk the same way that early in the morning. And if a cop aver wants to play that game I say no way and film everything he does and says. They're crooked and they used crooked tactics to screw people over they do it all the time. These videos are gold to a person watching. Do not ever trust the police blindly. Never.
That's why you ALWAYS refuse to take the tests. Let them dig their hole and then get paid. You have no obligation to help police wrongfully arrest you. Best bet is to do NOTHING, say NOTHING and let the fools make fools of themselves.
So there’s zero repercussions for ruining someone’s life for no reason? No incentive to prevent it from happening again? Wow. Absolutely broken system.
They'll say we're human will learn from this, let's move on from this, mistakes is the path to perfection. It's just lip service, it must be nice being a cop because if you make a mistake or ruin lives your boss is the one that'll apologize for you.
When the police are sued, it's taxpayer money that pays these settlements, not police pensions. Maybe look it up next time instead of spouting nonsense...
@@darylhopkins9796 Freedom of speech does not apply to a TH-cam comment section on a local news channel's page. It only applies to public property, your own property, or websites managed by the government, such as a PD's social media page.
Sadly people SUE all the time.... Qualified Immunity saves the cop as HE pays nothing...while taxpayers pay the settlements....with the cop learning nothing (except that he can do it again and again)
They regret being caught, not their actions. It’s also ridiculous it takes FOUR to EIGHT MONTHS to get a result back. There’s no reason there shouldn’t be a simple urine test for immediate results and then send off the blood work and make the charges at that point. I’d love to have this officer, or any, test 20 people (unknown to the cop they’re all sober) and see how many they’d judge as being under the influence. In no way am I defending drunk drivers; they should face consequences to the fullest extent. But, something needs to change. I’ve tried doing the walking test and leg balance a few times and know I’d fail. They’ll find anything you barely do wrong to be an indicator. Feet aren’t perfectly aligned heel to toe after each step? Indicator. Take too many tiny steps as you turn, don’t take enough steps and/or turn too fast? Indicators. Don’t even get me started on the balancing. I’ve seen cops wobbling just showing how to do the test, let alone those of use who aren’t in the best shape. They say the tests aren’t pass/fail, but they rely heavily upon the observation of the officer, which really is personal opinion at the time.
He did blinknreally slowly and closed his eyes tightly when stating how sorry he was for the victims. Bootlickers will say, "He showed empathy... and therefore should remain in office..." Back the blue until it happens to you.👍🏽
Yes. I was arrested wrongly and released with no charges and even apologized to for it but the damage was done. They did mugshots and fingerprints and afterwards I couldn't get hired anywhere despite being 100 percent innocent.
There isn't even a regular one most times I fought 3 yrs same shit my eyes were red so the officer said I was high it's even worse in states that have legal weed.
You should be investigating the department of transportation for the incentives they give these departments and their officers for DUI arrests, and the MADD lobby that are involved.
Trust me MADD has nothing to do with DUI arrests. You either have integrity as a cop or you don’t. I lead my department in DUI arrests twice there is no incentive to arresting people for DUI until you get to 10 arrests within a year and you get a pin from highway patrol-nothing else. I never once had a person come back under the limit, at the limit of .08 many times. The real shame is in my department all evidence and reports from the crime lab were reviewed by a Supervisor before being added to the report, as an officer it was up to the supervisor to drop a copy in my in-box or email. Alarm bells should have gone off after the first arrest where no drugs and alcohol were found. Then the video pulled up and reviewed. Here you see on the balance on one foot test Mr. Adams is holding his pants so they don’t get wet from the wet ground. So he is physically and mentally distracted holding his pants while trying to complete the test. Mr. Adams didn’t want his pants wet before work. If that jumped out at me, it jumped out at the supervisor. Plus a person’s conduct, behavior, content of speech, slurred speech, ability to follow directions are part of the test. I didn’t see anything notable. Stress, dislike of police, being late for work are considered normal so that is weighed in. If the supervisors reviewed this tape, they should be looking for all that mentioned. It looks like a case of covering the butt of the officer. The command staff should have been reviewing all his arrests DUI related or not after the first test results of no alcohol or drugs. In my department we investigated all accidents, so I have seen the carnage of DUI drivers. Today it is preventable with Uber and Lyft. This is bad cop and department covering for him.
@@josealexi5141 That will do nothing. Fear is prison is what keeps us in line, not fear of being sued and having to file bankruptcy, while paying zero dollars toward the judgment. If you end QI, all you get from it is cops with bad credit.
Exactly MADD gives cash bonuses for ARRESTS not CONVICTIONS. So it leads to officers abusing that system. Not to mention the accolades and awards given to these cops. The biggest problem with these false arrests sure charges are dropped but the arrest stays on your record which for truck drivers or pilots could ruin there livelihoods. but with qualified immunity these cops have no fear of getting it wrong and destroying peoples lives.
That's a really bad idea. If they did that, every cop that makes a mistake would have arrests overturned on precedent set by one case. This cop needs educated and watched.
I remember being intimidated to blow into the breathalyzer really really really hard like 4 times until I blew the legal limit. Lost a job at Budweiser with my friend and his dad. CHP bro fisted the other douche “you’re money bro”. It disgusts me how this cop turned these people’s lives for money
Here in Albuquerque, we have real bad drinking and driving problems, so the city came up with a program where if a bartender calls you a taxi, the taxi would give the drunk patron a free ride home. It was so effective, inner city dwi's dropped like 90%. But because people weren't driving drunk anymore, the police dwi task force couldn't catch anyone...so they lobbied to end the program, so their dwi task force could start catching drunk drivers again, so their task force didn't get terminated.
We still have the same problems: (1) they’re hiring the wrong people, (2) they reward them for bad behavior, (3) they rarely are held to account for their misdeeds (4) the public has no input their performance.
@@babeena_gt_3645 When you sue the police, the taxpayer pays. The department doesn't have to sell off any assets or fire anyone because they don't take the loss. The 2nd amendment is your only available recourse. This is what the 2nd amendment is for.
@@RisetoStrength also, just because a person has the right to bear arms,does not mean they necessarily have the right to use them. (The second amendment has nothing to do with this matter)
If the Chief says he is not sure how to "fix this" then he is the problem.
It makes you wonder what "problems" he has "fixed" in the past.
DOUBLE 👍 !
I know how to fix it!
Yes
It's not a problem (for the department). Field Sobriety Tests are DESIGNED for you to fail.
The chief is full of shit. This department needs to be SUED.
REPORTER: In this officer’s case you have three people who were sober and arrested for dui. So what does that tell you? CHIEF: It doesn’t necessarily tell me anything. 🤦♂️ 🙄
What a lame chief...
Pattern and practice of malicious prosecution ! Need a group lawsuit ! Or get the hell out of or bypass TN !
Imagine the irony if the chief is a drunk.
Think about how sad it is that he had to go out and apologize for this officer rather than the officer being in the interview. It's like having your mom talk to the teacher for you
He is so full of shit. I don't believe his apology. He is responsible for training his people. He needs to resign in disgrace
Agreed, listen to his excuse that only a blood draw can tell if they are impaired. Kidnapping and drawing blood should be grounds for prison for the cop.
This. Multiple departments in TN only use blood samples and won’t give breathalyzers.
I disagree, its not a training issue. The problem is the system is meant to be subjective. It's meant to give the officers evidence of impairment whether you are intoxicated or not. One of the few true things he said is that theres nothing he can do because the system is beyond him. There's no alternate.
The video says, one cop in his department.
Military veteran gun rights are being eternally abrogated based on FRAUDULENT DUI arrests!
America's system of dirty cops to disarm veterans can go to hell ...!
- USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)
End qualified immunity
Stop incentives for DUI arrests
stop incentives period. While they don't have quotas they have quota adjacent policies for receiving funds
A lot of-this is about the character of the recruitments to be cops. Protect and serve is ignored and too many seem to have the thug mentality, looking at the public as criminals, that almost seems to be prerequisite and encouraged as the lack of accountability in many cases shows. We all know that in cases where citizens perform same crimes they would face life changing criminal punishments; cops with qualified immunity frequently get away with paid vacations, ready to find employment in neighbouring counties.
Abolish civil forfeiture! Law enforcement has become boldfaced armed robbery.
@@stanswaby because the Supreme Court ruled that cops don't actually have a responsibility to protect anyone
You mean like Donald Trump?
This proves a pattern of knowingly violating civil rights
I believe the term you are looking for is domestic terrorists
Anyone who chooses to be a cop in America is volunteering to knowingly, enthusiastically violate civil rights.
Civil Rights are a myth that most of the population has been fooled into believing. The U.S. has always been ruled by the biggest fist with brute force... words come only after the violence is finished.
It’s been proven…. Look up the Battle of ATHENS, TN.
This proves treason against the American ppl
The officer should be sacked
Even if he is fired he'll keep his cop certificate and will just get a job at in the next town.
He should be arrested for kidnapping
Another district or state would simply hire the "officer."
And let me guess, they invested themselves and found no wrong doing.
He will just get another job somewhere else
Chief Goodwin stated that the officer arresting not just 1, but 3 sober drivers “doesn’t tell me anything”. That explains the root of the problem right there.
It is an order response and he didn’t seem too concerned about it either.
I notice that also...
It was 100% the smoking gun here.
it tells the chief that you have an officer who violates the law to defend the law. this officer will imprison an innocent person and has done so with a pattern. this chief is protecting a Revenue generator.
imagine how many other dui charges this sovereign citizen terrorist in uniform had before this investigation.
@@davidgiles4681 They are the Blue Line Cartel. Obey unconditionally, without Question or Hesitation or face shooting, arrest and beaten. Blue Line Cartel Policing while Afraid, is the most dangerous situation a citizen can face.
Sue the pd to have your records cleared and make them pay for false accusations. They can’t just say sorry and walk away. They ruined your reputation.
Sadly the courts won't do anything. The cops win and they know that they will win.
But they never said they're sorry, why are you people so dense !!! 😡👎
Arresting an innocent person should be a kidnapping charge.
Deprivation of rights ? Those tests are setup for failure rate way higher than not !?
Kidnapping with a firearm
Kidnapping, false imprisonment, and derelection of duty
in this situation yes.
18 USC 241
An officer arresting sober people for dui should be a jailable offense
Are you asking for accountability in 2024😆😆😆
IMHO, the bulk of the fault falls on the officer's department/police chief for not providing the officer (and others from that PD) with breathalyzers. The chief's lame response to the reporter's question as to why the dept. doesn't use breathalyzers was complete malarkey to me.
@@VelocityOfAFallingRock It is odd because that same excuse could also apply to the walking in a line and all that. Some people can be massively drunk and still walk a straight line, "functional drunks" do exist. Saying there are ways to get around it is a poor excuse to not use one of them.
Plus it's also a bit discriminatory against people. If your not in good health, as that Teacher looked over weight standing on one leg is not easy. Especially if you been on your feet all day working or are other wise tired. Never mind people with actual physical disabilities or medical conditions.
Lets be honest almost the entire DUI system really doesn't work on anything more than "The cop feels like your drunk".
@@JustaGuy_Gaming Agreed. Conducting sobriety checks and arresting people on suspicion of drunk driving without utilizing breathalyzers is substandard to say the least.
It is. It’s called false arrest.
It took four months to get his blood work back. What a crock of shit.
When I get bloodwork done, my results are in the portal the next day…sheesh
It makes no sense for the state to do the tests if a hospital drew the blood. Almost every hospital has a blood lab that can run basic tests and if they don't the send it to another hospital that can or to an outside lab. In most cases somebody's blood work results should be back that night or the next day. No longer than a week. It is crazy one person waited 8 months to get the results back.
Why can't they just use a breathalyser instead of all the unnecessary polava that is totally subjective? RBTs make way more sense. And take way less time.
Cover up
TBI is an incompetent and lazy government agency that CANNOT keep up with their lab work.
The other crime is that a schoolteacher had to work for Uber.
Absolutely!!
Teachers create next generation a better generation and they have to drive Uber after work? It’s is sin and shame on education department. If we stop corruption and stop funding wars our middle class will never have to struggle like this.
School teachers are worthless.
Every conviction by this officer should investigated and victims need compensated
By this department. Not just the officer.
Yup
People spend years in prison falsely and they are trying to cap the amount you can get per year held behind bars!
Oh definitely! This was high jacking and criminal extortion!
3 false DUI arrests by 1 officer. The chiefs response "well, it doesn't necessarily tell me anything"! RIGHT THERE IS THE F'N PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!
💯
Even after the cop lied on his police reports that there were multiple signs these people were intoxicated the chief doesnt see a problem. I hope the Mayor gets a hold of this and fire him...
Chief isn't going to fire the bad cop, and the mayor isn't going to fire the chief. Nothing will happen
Seems like "three strikes, you're out" is applicable here.
No doubt
False arrest is a crime.
This happens more often than you think. It happened to me. Even after I blew a 0.00 on the breathalyzer. He said I failed the road side test. The DA dropped the case at my court hearing, but I still spent a day in jail when I got arrested and had my car towed at my expense
@@la7era1u54did you lose respect for them that specific day or was it before.
I heard in another youtube video that it’s a federal crime too
@@la7era1u54 did you have a traffic infraction?
Where did that happen?
Happened to me too.
Cops where I lived lock people up for reporting drug trafficking. One lady, elderly, they kept in jail for 6 months for reporting drug trafficking.
By the time she got out the homeowners association had sold her condo so she was homeless.
Cathedral City, California
@@la7era1u54refuse the roadside test always. It’s subjective. Accept the breath test and if arrested the blood test. But sober or drunk the field side test does zero to help you and can only hurt you.
This is outright negligence.
That officer is drunk with power! He needs to go!
some officers are corrupt and power hungry
He does not regret and he will not change a thing.
Most
I mean all cops are like that LoL.
But I'm willing to let the guy slide on the one where the person had an OPEN Beer Can in his car, that's kinda.... dumb on his part for riding around like that.
Nah, it’s systemic. Look up Battle of Athens,TN.
Can you imagine how much a dui charge will ruin a teachers life?
Teacher hell. How about ANYBODY ?????
Who cares, NO ONE Asked You!
@@Fun_Time_Brooke I didn't see anyone ask you either, so shut it.
Right, and he wanted to call the school to get him a substitute teacher.
What about a guy who has a CDL and has to drive for a living?
Asking the chief "what does this tell you" and his reply "it doesn't tell me anything" shows he is part of the problem.
That whole department needs to be shut down and get somebody else to rule that county..
Rail on California all you want, but here, a breathalyzer is done before handcuffs and a blood test is completed that day for drugs. The police would be sued so hard here for that lol
Exactly
💯
Yea that was crazy, he sounded impaired during this interview.
"I'm not sure how I fix this, do I give him a raise? A promotion? Paid vacation? This is really concerning and I can't do a single thing about it" ~the man who can do anything about it.
When the chief says that when innocent people are wrongly charged doesn’t tell him anything, it shows he is incompetent.
And it shows the sobriety test is hard for a sober person to pass.
@@shahtajali6321 Indeed, it's impossible. It's a subjective test and it is observed and analyzed by a cop who already thinks you're drunk and is looking for justification to arrest you. It's a roadside kangaroo court.
So I always advise:
*Never agree to do a field sobriety test.* They are optional. You are not required to perform them. Some people mistakenly think that your driver's license will be suspended if you refuse to do an FST. That is not true. The 5th amendment protects your right not to be a witness against yourself.
Breathalyzers are different. A breathalyzer -- whether the portable handheld kind or the offical desktop machine back at the police station -- merely analyzes your breath. It doesn't require you to perform a gymnastics routine. So the 5th amendment protection against self-incrimination doesn't apply.
But even so, in most states* you can refuse those, too. (I'm talking about the handheld portable ones that the cops use to determine if there is probable cause to arrest you. They are not as accurate and reliable as the full-size devices at the police station that provide the offical breath alcohol analysis.)
If the cop lawfully determines there is probable cause to arrest you, then you will be taken to the police station to blow into the official desktop machine. That one you DO have to blow into. But in most states* you are not required to blow into the portable handheld device at the side of the road. (Although if you're completely sober, you may as well go ahead and do it. Unlike a subjective field sobriety test, a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) is a nonhuman machine that isn't looking for an excuse to arrest you.) (Assuming it's working properly.)
TL;DR: You must never, under any circumstances, no matter how sober you are, perform a field sobriety test! They're not legally required and they're impossible to pass.
______________________
There are eight states in which you *_can_* be punished for refusing the roadside portable breathalyzer:
Alaska Nevada
Michigan New York
Montana North Dakota
Nebraska Rhode Island
and Indiana, *_if_* you're involved in a fatal accident.
It shows he's lying.
Right, but they noticed "indicators" and "patterns" for roadside piracy all day, every day. Convenient!
@@shahtajali6321 This is interesting. I posted a lengthy, informative reply to your comment, and TH-cam deleted it. Without notice, and for no reason. 😠
All right; I'll try again....
@shahtajali6321 Indeed, it's impossible. The field sobriety test is a subjective test and it is observed and analyzed by a cop who already thinks you're drunk and is looking for justification to arrest you. It's a roadside kangaroo court.
So I always advise:
*Never agree to do a field sobriety test.* They are optional. You are not required to perform them. Some people mistakenly think that your driver's license will be suspended if you refuse to do an FST. That is not true. The 5th amendment protects your right not to be a witness against yourself.
Breathalyzers are different. A breathalyzer -- whether the portable handheld kind or the offical desktop machine back at the police station -- merely analyzes your breath. It doesn't require you to perform a gymnastics routine. So the 5th amendment protection against self-incrimination doesn't apply.
But even so, in most states* you can refuse those, too. (I'm talking about the handheld portable ones that the cops use to determine if there is probable cause to arrest you. They are not as accurate and reliable as the full-size devices at the police station that provide the offical breath alcohol analysis.)
If the cop lawfully determines there is probable cause to arrest you, then you will be taken to the police station to blow into the official desktop machine. That one you DO have to blow into. But in most states* you are not required to blow into the portable handheld device at the side of the road. (Although if you're completely sober, you may as well go ahead and do it. Unlike a subjective field sobriety test, a preliminary alcohol screening (PAS) is a nonhuman machine that isn't looking for an excuse to arrest you.) (Assuming it's working properly.)
TL;DR: You must never, under any circumstances, no matter how sober you are, perform a field sobriety test! They're not legally required and they're impossible to pass.
______________________
There are eight states in which you *_can_* be punished for refusing the roadside portable breathalyzer:
Alaska Nevada
Michigan New York
Montana North Dakota
Nebraska Rhode Island
and Indiana, *_if_* you're involved in a fatal accident.
Three people arrested for DUI that weren’t drinking and it doesn’t tell you anything. He’s not sorry at all.
Seems intoxicated.
The three people will have to jump hurdles to get their license back due to the license being suspended for dui! I think that the officer should be charged with multiple charges and have to pay those people and their attorneys!
A lot of-this is about the character of the recruitments to be cops. Protect and serve is ignored and too many seem to have the thug mentality, looking at the public as criminals, that almost seems to be prerequisite and encouraged as the lack of accountability in many cases shows. We all know that in cases where citizens perform same crimes they would face life changing criminal punishments; cops with qualified immunity frequently get away with paid vacations, ready to find employment in neighbouring counties.
Republicans Rock! In Trump we Trust.
Trump Bless America!
If you aren't guilty,you got nothing to worry about.
Hey, dude wait, that's my mom!
Abolish qualified immunity and let these victims directly sue the officers involved.
No sue the police union
Not with this Supreme Court
Yes
Qualified Immunity is Sovereign Immunity. Police are Sovereign citizens with guns and arrest powers.
I was falsely arrested but then I got 3.7 million in damages . 2.5 after legal bills .
Police Chief, "So sorry, we aren't changing a thing"
The chief is only "sorry" because they were caught. He should be fired for failure to supervise.
Do you know him?
And they are about to sued the hell out of them that’s the only reason
@@jayf8308 He's a cop. They are almost all criminal abusers with no regard for honest citizens. If the Chief cared he would have fired that officer. They only pretend to care when they get caught because of lawsuits.
The chief, looks away when asked questions. He is obviously lying.
@@jayf8308SHUT UP! Do you know him? Lmao defending idiots the slightest you belong in a cage with them
This is criminal, not to use a breathalyzer. Sue the department, Chief, and Officer.
No, you use a blood draw from a lab. Even breathalyzer can be miscalibrated or otherwise rigged to make you fall
Breathalyzer can still be rigged against you
A breathalyzer only tells half the story. Somebody might be impaired by drug use.
Exactly, tax payers should be punished for it.
Good luck. Qualified immunity.
Cops are out of control.
This is why their cameras need to be used for supervision in the moment rather than waiting til he's in court before the truth is out. Cops like this can be blamed on their boss and their poor training. This should never happen.
That's a funny way to spell Clowns
change the word cop's to something else, like a race, or religion, or immigration status, the country of origin to the most likely perpetrator of crime in paris, Talk about it all.
@@robertruge2916 .08 is absolutely ridiculous. A beer and a. Shot with sinner and youre going to jail if youre pulled over. I'm not advocating for drinking and driving but lets be real here. I see videos on here all the time saying someone is twice the legal limit and act like they're absolutely hammered. I dont know many if any people that get sloshed off 4 beers.
These are TACTICS TO GET EVERYONES DNA! Cops have become Americas BIGGEST DISGRACE! Traitors of every soldier that ever served, fought and even DIED FOR OUR FREEDOMS!
1) if police chief doesn't know how to correct this simple problem, he's got NO BUSINESS being police chief. 2) Physical sobriety tests are a joke. If airports can swipe your hands abd detect drugs within seconds, don't BS us about time issues!
It tells me that the officer is a criminal and belongs in prison.
You don’t even know… look up The Battle of Athens, TN.
Right
A lot of-this is about the character of the recruitments to be cops. Protect and serve is ignored and too many seem to have the thug mentality, looking at the public as criminals, that almost seems to be prerequisite and encouraged as the lack of accountability in many cases shows. We all know that in cases where citizens perform same crimes they would face life changing criminal punishments; cops with qualified immunity frequently get away with paid vacations, ready to find employment in neighbouring counties.
These cops want to make brownie points to help their careers off of DUI arrests and they don’t even seem to care that they are ruining innocent people’s lives.
They don’t care even one bit. Not their life.
this is why I love to read their obituaries
The culture of us vs them and QI has to end
Cop in a coffin has a good ring to it 😂😂@@1_fishin_magician153
That's how it's always been. Its especially egregious in black communities
A criminal with a badge is still a criminal. The corrupt police union will protect him.
Thug with a badge
With qualified immunity
Why police unions protect only dirty cops? Why did they not protect Cariol Horne and Christopher Dorner who were good cops? Also, why those union do not lobby the law: former cops should be imprisoned separately from the civilians like in Russia and Europe?
Their all-powerful union needs to be disbanded.
Sounds like that chief is gonna protect his officer. That officer is either corrupt or very incompetent.
Worse than that....he's in a police union....
People lose their jobs over only getting CHARGED with a DUI, not being guilty of a DUI. Guilty until proven guilty.
Yep...
Sue the jobs for unlawful termination. America was built on suing people.
Exactly! The police act like getting arrested and charged is no big deal 🤬
Hence why the police should be liable for such damages.
@@Incel_81
The employer can usually make up some other reason (or none at all) to fire someone.
If being completely sober isn't enough to protect you from a DUI arrest, *how the hell are innocent citizens supposed to avoid this???*
The purge
You avoid it by telling every idiot that votes Republican and every idiot that votes for a Democrat that acts like a Republican to stop being scumbags and actually elect honest politicians that will hold them accountable otherwise NOTHING WILL CHANGE
VOTING MATTERS AND IF WE ELECT SCUMBAGS LIKE TRUMP HE WILL ONLY INSTALL JUDGES THAT MAKE THIS WORSE THATS REALITY VOTING MATTERS
That's the fun part, we can't.
You can’t you live in a police state!!
Chief is a coward!
Needs to be removed and the arresting officer needs to be in jail.
Wouldn't that be awesome.. meanwhile back in the reality of the police state in which we live.. the chief will continue full speed ahead with the raking in of dollars in the how many sheeple can we fleece today game.
THE TEACHER IS A GOOD MAN; A MAN TRYING TO MAKE A LIVING.
Knowingly arresting innocent people should cost your badge for life
Who said it was knowingly?
That's an idiotic statement. If the person arrested exhibited clues of impairment then probable cause exists for an arrest.
@@johnforster4023 how about a breathlyzer?
@@johnforster4023 Probable cause or not, arrest or not. The burden of proof is on the state; they must prove the driver was impaired.
@@johnforster4023clues of poor coordination and poor physical fitness are not signs of impairment.
If you are a cop, then you should know better. Any cop, with any common sense can absolutely tell the difference.
Very cavalier in ruining innocent people's lives. It takes $5k to $10k in legal fees and fines, mandatory 48 hrs in jail, explain that to your boss, lose your license, potentially lose your job, get dropped from your insurance, strain on your family.
And even when you win, it's STILL on your record for every future background check where you will have to explain it all over again.
Plus OVIs are always on your record. It will never be removed. Pretty much barred from any driving job for life, which in this age is extremely limiting. They also don't talk about how much of the world you are banned from with an OVI charge. Can't go to Canada, UK, Mexico, Australia, and many many more. All so a corrupt cop can get a few buck and some compliments from his fellow cronies. Cops are evil, evil "people".
@TsFunk unlawful arrest lawsuit will prevail in court because they knew better.
I'm going to guess this officer was a MADD award recipient; they receive awards only for arrests, not convictions. When you incentivize this conduct, its not surprising the end result, innocent people are victimized. If the department actually cared, they would have done something about it the first time it happened, not the 3rd time and when it became public.
It's been more than three and a half years. I am still legally unable to drive and they have still not ever tested my bloodwork. What the fuck am I supposed to do? Permanently remain legally unable to drive my own vehicle? After soooo long I am on the verge of violence, EVERY part of the system I contact reroutes me to another part and they have been spinning in in circles for ALMOST FOUR YEARS, HOW IS IT MY FAULT IF I GET VIOLENT OVER MY LIVELIHOOD BLATANTLY BEING HELD HOSTAGE OVER BLOOD SO OLD THAT IT IS NO LONGER VIABLE FOR TESTING GODDAMN EVEN THE TWO FAMILY-FRIEND LAWYERS WOULDN'T ADVISE ME SO I AM ABOUT TO START GIVING THE ADVICE OUT MYSELF WITH SOME HEAVY MACHINERY BITCH I AM *TIRED OF IT* DAMN
Notice how the sheriff didn't want to blame the officer!
Cause then they would be accountable
Giving somebody a blood test *and then arresting them before the results are known* equates to "guilty until proven innocent".
That Chief is as guilty as his Officer. He's not sorry and he is a horrible actor!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍
Indeed!
Oh but he "hurts"
He's only sorry that they got caught being corrupt and looking like the assholes they actually are.
Yeah I would sued the city 😅
Chief sitting there crying saying he don’t know how to fix this. Here’s a start, put that lying officer of yours in prison! Corruption at its finest.
A better start is STEP DOWN and let someone who DOES know what to do handle it.
@TsFunk Well, since he doesnt know how to fix it, then RESIGN !!!
This is what happens when they have incentives for DUI arrest but not convictions.
well there you go....interesting to find out what incentives are used....
@@leelaural
Mother's Against Drunk Drivers has an annual award (for arrest not convictions). Individual police departments have promotions and bonuses (arrest not convictions). Etc., etc..
@@mtw1234,
The LAW get 40% percent of their pay check from Tax payers
The other 60 % percent is from speeding tickets, drug busts, DUI/ DWI stops and WARRENTS
THESE P1GS WANT PAID !
@@jimthomas1989
You're absolutely right 👍
💯 follow the money!
At what point do we fight back against this injustice.
THE CHIEF DOESN'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT THAT OFFICER DID.
The reporter says ""Police can't take the risk of not arresting someone.""
What a bonehead statement. He needs to be stopped and arrested for stupidity.
Police can't even read street addresses yet they feel the need to arrest anyone they feel like. It's absurd & it's hurting the community.
💯 exactly. He's part of the problem. What do you mean they can't afford not to arrest? They can afford to observe anyone and see if they're actually impaired...
They can afford to take a breathalyzer.
They can afford to wait for the lab results before charging.
As they do to their own when drunk, they can afford to drive them home. What they can't afford is accountability. Fire and charge the officer. You have to ask what was even the reason for the stop because these guys were sober was there even a traffic violation. That's not a training issue, that's a systemic issue.
The final commentator was ridiculous -- arrest him for CUI - commentating whilst under the influence
Your car gets impounded and get charged towing and storage fees...not to mention legal bills. 💸💸💸💸
@@ronaldsykes6105Wow. I hadn't thought of that. Very good point. And what if he had children to pickup after school?
That officer deserves 10 years behind bars for kidnapping citizens who never broke the law.
Agree. Its domestic terrorism
people need to look into mothers against drunk driving MADD they give awards $$$ to officers for DUI arrest even if the person has found innocent so they’re actually incentivized to get arrested cause they get money for it which is so wrong
your constitution instructs you to take them out and the constitution is above the law
STREET JUSTICE!!
In the UK the police use a red/green breathalyser. It just shows negative or positive until they use a more accurate machine at the station.
There are many reasons why someone may be unstable on their feet without it being connected to drinking or using drugs.
The sobriety test isn't accurate. A cop pulled me over and asked if I could say the alphabet backwards, I asked him the same question and he said no. It's a stupid test 🙄
I call BS. Ain’t no officer going to ask you to do that. It’s a standardized test, not some Willy Nilly circus act.
@@Witzer0616 You can find body cam videos of officers asking people to do this occasionally. From what I've heard, some cops use it as a stalling tactic to get a drug dog to the scene before being required to release someone.
Cops aren't qualified to administer the tests anyway. The tests aren't designed to prove a citizen is innocent. They're designed to give cops more information to justify their decision to arrest you.
@@Witzer0616 Nope, I personally called out some of my squad for asking that TV question.
Sobriety tests are designed for you to fail
The officer went to a 4 hour class to identify dui drivers but now thinks he’s judge and jury on the side of the road
I've always said, if you as a person want a job where you can pull people over, write them tickets,often frivolously, and have the ability to handcuff and put a person in jail, you are probably the kind of person who should not be a cop.
💥👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@@clbaird40Yep, lumps in with "if you're seeking/drawn to power, you're probably not fit to wield it."
They are like the playleaders that back in the days were tasked to take care of the smaller ones in elementary on the playground. Except they are grown.
Chief says 3 wrongful DUI charges tells him nothing and doesn't know how to fix it? Fire him too.
"too" really? Where in the story was ANY discipline applied. The LEO is still employed there.
Agreed. "I don't know how to fix it..." Buy Breathalyzers! Simple. Stop the field sobriety tests because they're TOO SUBJECTIVE.
Same story different, different city and state. We all need to step up against our government, now. It will never change.
there is nothing to fix, if someone is too dumb to complete field sobrierity test when SOBER, then it means driver is unsafe to drive on roads.
how would you react if one of those sober, yet impaired drivers would crash into YOUR car? and as result you'd sustain serious injuries .. then you'd be whining "why aren't cops doing their job and removing such impaired drivers from the roads? FIRE THEM ALL!"
problem is that you're not using common sense, because you don't have any.
@@SethiozProject I smell bacon.
This proves field test are not a legitimate way to find out if one is under the influence
Its pretty clear that officers across the country are being trained to do this.
The process IS the punishment. Notice he said "signs" not evidence. It was done on opinion.
This is why you never submit to field sobriety tests. There is no state in the United States that penalizes you for refusing field sobriety tests.
If they think you are drunk, this forces their hand and then they have to bring you down for a breathalyzer.
Yup, look up battle of Athens , TN
@@deebee4575they would probably still lock them up for refusing and take a blood draw.
Trained by the IDF
It tells you that officer needs to be fired.
The cop needs to go to jail. He was abusing his power.
This is crazy and obviously they are corrupt, but the one person shouldn’t have had a half full open container in the car. What is one supposed to think?
@@darkopzthen why is it just one guy who’s done this to three people and no other officers?
More than 600 sober drivers arrested for DUI in TN
You aren’t sorry for what you did. You’re sorry you got caught.
Yes.
@@christianbrown-qm9lj Stop incentives for DUI arrests
"To extort and incarcerate" should be the motto. They sure ain't protecting and serving.
Protect and serve is now harass and collect.
Disgusting LEO behavior.
Chief must resign.
Typical LEO behavior.
Have the arresting officer get a $5,000 fine for every False Arrests, and $10,000 fee to the Falsely Arresting Police Department. This $15K will then be awarded to the victims of this Criminal Money Making Scam... and watch how fast this corruption ends.
I am old, overweight, top heavy, with bad, arthritic knees. I would never be able to pass a roadside test.
You are automatically DUI. :)
Passing a roadside test is the least of your issues.
I have bilateral hip and knee replacement. I most definitely know that I will never pass a field sobriety test.
Simply decline the test.
Either would I, lots of back surgery, ortho issues… I wouldn’t even let them give me the test… I know I would look like I’ve been drinking… and I don’t drink.
That officer is a direct reflection of his leadership.
This teacher wasn't even worried about the arrest, he was worried about his students by asking to make a call to the school to arrange a substitute for the day. I hope he sues and wins every dollar he deserves, this is just sad. Your students are blessed to have you as their teacher 💙
He was LUCKY he wasn’t suspended. He could have lost his teaching license until the charge was cleared.
That $15k in lost wages needs to come out of the supervisor's pocket.
That is me in the video, Dave - thank you Dave for those words. My students are the reason I do what I do. They are awesome. Just completed year 33.
@jeffadams8947 Congratulations on 33 years of developing minds 🎉💪🏿
Remember
The citizens of that community are victims too- without notice,The insurance bill goes way up for the town when these three sad cases are adjudicated and settlements
paid.It's NEVER coming out of a cop's paycheck.Why? Qualified immunity
That's not good enough an apology
Chief doesn’t know how to fix it? Really? Then why is he police chief?
Very simple. Fire the ignorant abusive criminal, masquerading as a LEO. Then tell every other officer in the department that they will be fired if they do the same thing.
Exactly, "I'm incompetent and in over my head". Step down then.
That was exactly what I thought when he said that
And his answer as to what does this tell you and he says I don't know what this tells me.
He is friends with the mayor.
And remind the police unions that the former officer BETRAYED and UNDERMINED them.
It is not a field sobriety test. It is a field agility test. Not the same thing.
Yes, I would fail it, have balance issues standing, so unfair. I would say can I use my cane.
It's an evidence gathering exercise more than anything. When they say "I need to make sure you're okay to drive" it's a lie. "I want to trick you into giving me more things to use against you" is more like it.
About 14 years ago, a police captain and I were having a drink and he tells me:
“Know why sh!t like this happens? The cops know yours not drunk or whatever, but in the amount of time it’ll take to prove your innocence, the officer will have gone to court and gotten his overtime hours off of your misery”…
Let that sink in
Also, many states give financial incentives to local police for DUI arrests, NOT convictions.
There are also "Sxxxxxxs Against Drunk Driving" who are a good fit to back up usual police abuse.
Great company u keep there, u must be a pig too or at least pig adjacent
Fascinating. Cops pulled this scam on me. Put me in shackles and chains.
Put my dog in the shelter actually up for adoption.
Threw me in jail.
Towed my vehicle.
Had zero traffic infraction and no alcohol or drugs whatsoever. 0:0
These freaks wanted me to sign that I wouldn't sue
I said no way
Then they used a helicopter over my house hovering above looking inside my house which had walls of glass to torment me. They dumped Morgellons disease on my house and on the property basically destroyed my health.
These cops are insane pumped up with steroids and a menace to the community.
Palm Desert California
Pure evil
Yes I left the area
The stories I could tell
Bone chilling
Great company u keep
If I leave out the pig part, will u not delete
A million dollars per false arrest sounds like just compensation, to me. Take it out of the police budget.
3 million
The fact that they refuse to use a breathalyser and go for an iffy field sobriety test shows what a con it is
100% agree, you can get a blood test at a hospital in a few days...let TBI validate the blood test if need be but waiting months almost a year for results is crazy while people suffer the consequences of being falsely accused.
Thank God here in North Carolina we can legally refuse to do field sobriety tests without consequence (but will lose your license for 1 year if you refuse a breathalyzer). I tell all the drivers I know that if they ever get suspected of drinking to refuse to do any field sobriety tests and offer to do a breathalyzer test instead.
@user-sf7kl9uh7k I believe in the majority of the states you can legally refuse very biased and subjective field sobriety tests, but not breathalyzers. This gives you more of a legal footing if arrested falsely.
@@ChrisPatrick-q6k you'll also be arrested if you "fail" their subjective field sobriety test when you haven't had a drop of alcohol. I'll take my chances with the breathalyzers or BAC test.
in most states, you can refuse the roadside tests as they are extremely subjective. fewer states allow you to refuse the roadside breathalyzer, mostly in states where those are not admissible in court. generally it requires the blood test to be admissible in court, or the breathalyzer they use at the station, not roadside. look up the rules for your own state as to what you can refuse. you would be surprised in most cases.
It also proves without a reasonable doubt that the field sobriety test is completely subjective, inaccurate, and should be removed and not applicable in court
I agree, just like hearsay. Anything subjective should not be admissible in court because cops are pathological liars, drunk with their perceived authority
I walk the same way that early in the morning. And if a cop aver wants to play that game I say no way and film everything he does and says. They're crooked and they used crooked tactics to screw people over they do it all the time. These videos are gold to a person watching. Do not ever trust the police blindly. Never.
The crooked cops like it this way.
That's why you ALWAYS refuse to take the tests. Let them dig their hole and then get paid. You have no obligation to help police wrongfully arrest you.
Best bet is to do NOTHING, say NOTHING and let the fools make fools of themselves.
It's always been bs, that's why you can usually choose not to partake in field sobriety tests, but you would have to blow in the alcohol detector.
So there’s zero repercussions for ruining someone’s life for no reason? No incentive to prevent it from happening again? Wow. Absolutely broken system.
The system isn’t broken. It’s doing exactly what it’s supposed to do. None of this stuff is an accident.
You can thank SCOTUS, they created Qualified Immunity on a whim based upon NO laws.
They'll say we're human will learn from this, let's move on from this, mistakes is the path to perfection. It's just lip service, it must be nice being a cop because if you make a mistake or ruin lives your boss is the one that'll apologize for you.
Those people will be paid well for the false arrest.
As I’ve heard before, when a system successfully perpetuates itself in spite of the harm it causes, “it’s not broken, it’s working as intended”.
This is crazy! How is it not mandatory to use a breathalyzer
This will not stop until innocent people start suing the city. Take those pensions away.
When the police are sued, it's taxpayer money that pays these settlements, not police pensions. Maybe look it up next time instead of spouting nonsense...
The city will never run out of taxpayer money to pay for police wrongdoing.
@@dirtyfrench2926 I say what ever the hell I feel like saying. Freedom of speech.
@@darylhopkins9796 Freedom of speech does not apply to a TH-cam comment section on a local news channel's page. It only applies to public property, your own property, or websites managed by the government, such as a PD's social media page.
Sadly people SUE all the time.... Qualified Immunity saves the cop as HE pays nothing...while taxpayers pay the settlements....with the cop learning nothing (except that he can do it again and again)
The only reason he regrets the arrests is he got called out on it.If the chief doesn't know what's happening in his own house he needs to go.
Notice how the Chief refuses to apologize. He said he regrets it, but no apology.
The cop needs to be in prison!
"Mistakes were made" excuse !!!!
Regrets that his officer got caught.
They regret being caught, not their actions. It’s also ridiculous it takes FOUR to EIGHT MONTHS to get a result back. There’s no reason there shouldn’t be a simple urine test for immediate results and then send off the blood work and make the charges at that point.
I’d love to have this officer, or any, test 20 people (unknown to the cop they’re all sober) and see how many they’d judge as being under the influence. In no way am I defending drunk drivers; they should face consequences to the fullest extent. But, something needs to change.
I’ve tried doing the walking test and leg balance a few times and know I’d fail. They’ll find anything you barely do wrong to be an indicator. Feet aren’t perfectly aligned heel to toe after each step? Indicator. Take too many tiny steps as you turn, don’t take enough steps and/or turn too fast? Indicators. Don’t even get me started on the balancing. I’ve seen cops wobbling just showing how to do the test, let alone those of use who aren’t in the best shape.
They say the tests aren’t pass/fail, but they rely heavily upon the observation of the officer, which really is personal opinion at the time.
Sheriff Barney Fife. The guy is a moron.
The officer doing the arrest should receive the sentence those innocent drivers could have got. NEVER take a field sobriety test.
He is so good at DUI he even arrests sober drivers! Amazing skills.
Lol
Maybe he was doing preventive arrests 😂 in my country the government does preventive arrests on its political rivals 🤭
Tyrant!! Highway piracy. 🤬🤬
@@Yesterdayrose2811😂😂😂
@@Yesterdayrose2811 Sounds like the average western country.
Relieve the Chief of Police immediately! He has failed to take any responsibility and is not a leader.
He did blinknreally slowly and closed his eyes tightly when stating how sorry he was for the victims.
Bootlickers will say, "He showed empathy... and therefore should remain in office..."
Back the blue until it happens to you.👍🏽
ONE COPP ARRESTS THEM GETTING KICKBACKS OR WHAT. CHIEF YOU SHOULD GET WARNER AND ARREST HIM. SHAMEFUL...
Even an arrest can be enough to destroy someone's life, even if they're not convicted. This needs to stop.
The system is fundamentally broken if the accusation ALONE is enough to destroy your entire life. What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"???
@@ianbattles7290people have been fired from their job for stuff like this
YES!... Thank You!
Yes. I was arrested wrongly and released with no charges and even apologized to for it but the damage was done. They did mugshots and fingerprints and afterwards I couldn't get hired anywhere despite being 100 percent innocent.
I lost my job due to a false arrest. Charges were dropped a week later and I couldn’t get my job back
INSTANT LAWSUIT ! False arrest
There's no such thing as in "instant" lawsuit.
There isn't even a regular one most times I fought 3 yrs same shit my eyes were red so the officer said I was high it's even worse in states that have legal weed.
Bingo. Instant Arrest... The dude copper..
Nope. Look up Battle of Athens , TN
@@joshcourt1393them guys who came back from ww2 weren't playing.
How the fudge does it take 4 months to return a blood test on such a punishing accusation? That’s unnaceptable.
IIRC in the UK an alcohol blood test is back in days, a drug test might take a week or two.
It doesn't. It takes that long for the bureaucracy.
You can get a non legal etoh level at the emergency room in 20-30 min.
@@nilremuk The US treats it's citizens like lab rats. Couldn't care less if days, weeks, or years of your life are wasted by their lack of effort.
"After stopping all crime the cops had nothing better to do than play pranks on innocent people."
You should be investigating the department of transportation for the incentives they give these departments and their officers for DUI arrests, and the MADD lobby that are involved.
And when we do sue, we should be suing their Union's and their pensions
How are these incentives not a conflict of interest? It's revenue collcting BS
@@michaeljohn8567 it goes through their union and the contract they make with the state and federal government.
Trust me MADD has nothing to do with DUI arrests. You either have integrity as a cop or you don’t. I lead my department in DUI arrests twice there is no incentive to arresting people for DUI until you get to 10 arrests within a year and you get a pin from highway patrol-nothing else. I never once had a person come back under the limit, at the limit of .08 many times.
The real shame is in my department all evidence and reports from the crime lab were reviewed by a Supervisor before being added to the report, as an officer it was up to the supervisor to drop a copy in my in-box or email. Alarm bells should have gone off after the first arrest where no drugs and alcohol were found. Then the video pulled up and reviewed. Here you see on the balance on one foot test Mr. Adams is holding his pants so they don’t get wet from the wet ground. So he is physically and mentally distracted holding his pants while trying to complete the test. Mr. Adams didn’t want his pants wet before work. If that jumped out at me, it jumped out at the supervisor. Plus a person’s conduct, behavior, content of speech, slurred speech, ability to follow directions are part of the test. I didn’t see anything notable. Stress, dislike of police, being late for work are considered normal so that is weighed in. If the supervisors reviewed this tape, they should be looking for all that mentioned.
It looks like a case of covering the butt of the officer. The command staff should have been reviewing all his arrests DUI related or not after the first test results of no alcohol or drugs. In my department we investigated all accidents, so I have seen the carnage of DUI drivers. Today it is preventable with Uber and Lyft.
This is bad cop and department covering for him.
Trust you , bullshit @@aftertheheadlines
That Chief is showing every sign of deception in his speaking. He backs that officer 100%.
The chief cried crocodile tears. He said he doesn't know how to fix it? Step one, fire this officer.
step 2 resign
@@krtacct Step 3: revoke his certification to be a cop somewhere else.
This is a very concerning and sad story. Especially hearing that a teacher in the USA has to supplement his income driving for uber. WTAF America?
That officer needs to be fired, fined and put in prison. And blacklisted from ever becoming a cop or even security personnel.
If he doesn't sue the shit out the city, he's a fool. These crooked cops MUST be stopped.
Any money he gets will just cause taxes to go up and nothing will change. They get bonuses for every felony arrest, not conviction.
Until the legal fund is hooked up to police pensions instead of tax payer money, they ain’t going to do shit lol
@@gregwaisso6838money will come out of a insurance fund, not tax money
remove qualified immunity!
@@josealexi5141 That will do nothing. Fear is prison is what keeps us in line, not fear of being sued and having to file bankruptcy, while paying zero dollars toward the judgment. If you end QI, all you get from it is cops with bad credit.
All three victims really should sue this Police Department.
Unfortunately, suing means the taxpayers will foot the bill. It should be coming out of the police dept somehow (or personal liability).
There's a lawyer on youtube who advises us to refuse to take these roadside tests, because they are unfair, and can incriminate sober drivers.
The cop was just trying to hit his DUI quota, guilty or innocent is irrelevant
Exactly MADD gives cash bonuses for ARRESTS not CONVICTIONS. So it leads to officers abusing that system. Not to mention the accolades and awards given to these cops. The biggest problem with these false arrests sure charges are dropped but the arrest stays on your record which for truck drivers or pilots could ruin there livelihoods. but with qualified immunity these cops have no fear of getting it wrong and destroying peoples lives.
@@allenk946 can you sue for removing those records?
@@kiemugen9830 can’t sue but what does the government want most MONEY you can pay to have them expunged
The officer needs to be investigated for possible false statements / perjury
That incompetent chief needs to be fired for running a corrupt department.
They can really ruin people’s lives with these false arrests. They’re horrible and cruel for doing this
Yeah like it's a game to them for good pats on the back... Think about that
Wrecking lives for attention and accommodations
Wtf
It's also disgusting how you can face all of these consequences *even if you are never convicted.* What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"???
Keep that same energy for all accusations against men also!
Well make sure that cop gets prosecuted call your local representative and DA's office and demand this if you live there.
@@ianbattles7290up to 8 freaking month waiting for and alcohol test while your license remains suspended, freaking Outrageous.
Police Chief does NOTHING ? The person’s reputation is ruined.
Every arrest from that guy should be overturned
Let just wait to see if they are going to charge the cop with anything.
The cop will get a promotion in another town somewhere in the south of course.
Someone is getting a kickback somewhere along the chain between the lab to the arresting officer!
@@lcfflc3887 "We've investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing"- The largest most violent gang in the country.
That's a really bad idea. If they did that, every cop that makes a mistake would have arrests overturned on precedent set by one case. This cop needs educated and watched.
There is unlimited grant money tied to DUIs, they will do nothing to fix it.
I remember being intimidated to blow into the breathalyzer really really really hard like 4 times until I blew the legal limit. Lost a job at Budweiser with my friend and his dad. CHP bro fisted the other douche “you’re money bro”.
It disgusts me how this cop turned these people’s lives for money
Here in Albuquerque, we have real bad drinking and driving problems, so the city came up with a program where if a bartender calls you a taxi, the taxi would give the drunk patron a free ride home. It was so effective, inner city dwi's dropped like 90%. But because people weren't driving drunk anymore, the police dwi task force couldn't catch anyone...so they lobbied to end the program, so their dwi task force could start catching drunk drivers again, so their task force didn't get terminated.
Wow.@@TheUnholyPosole
“All a man’s got is his reputation and his name”…no truer words spoken in this video.
All people deserve justice
That is me in the video - thank you Jennifer.
We still have the same problems: (1) they’re hiring the wrong people, (2) they reward them for bad behavior, (3) they rarely are held to account for their misdeeds (4) the public has no input their performance.
SUE FOR FALSE ARREST!!!! CHECK ALL THE FILES THAT THIS MAN IS CONNECTED WITH... THIS OFFICER SHOULD BE FIRED!!!
Charged with false arrest, adjudicated and imprisoned.
Most attorneys want a minimum retainer of $1,000 or more,and not everyone has that
@@babeena_gt_3645 When you sue the police, the taxpayer pays.
The department doesn't have to sell off any assets or fire anyone because they don't take the loss.
The 2nd amendment is your only available recourse.
This is what the 2nd amendment is for.
@@RisetoStrength you still have to pay a out of pocket retainer to the lawyer you choose that are NOT the tax payers dollars
@@RisetoStrength also, just because a person has the right to bear arms,does not mean they necessarily have the right to use them. (The second amendment has nothing to do with this matter)