In the same debate Dr Ambedkar also said that Art 14, 15, 17 and 25 to 30 provide sufficiently that India in its spirit is secular. Source The Hindu Editorial dated 25 November
Dr Ambedkar admirably throws out the amendment brought about to insert these terms Secular and Socialist during the CA debates. His reasons are astounding ones. Therefore, these terms cannot form the basic structure. May be the SC upheld the Tampered-Constitution. Only from SC i come to know that Indira Ghandy was a Founding member of the Constitution.
If the constitution is so universal for all, why Nehru was incompetent to make it applicable to Kashmir also but allowing it to have a separate one? This clearly shows the present constitution is a Hindu Constitution. This can only mean that once the present demography goes, the constitution will see its demise. Then why should have the term secular?
I am happy and relieved to hear the judgement of the Supreme court for retaining the words Secular and Socilist in the preamble of the Constitution..all Sanghis will be crying 😂😂😭😭😭
In the same debate Dr Ambedkar also said that Art 14, 15, 17 and 25 to 30 provide sufficiently that India in its spirit is secular.
Source The Hindu Editorial dated 25 November
@@Rabaika_here are you preparing for UPSC cse ?
Please decrease the volume of background music.. I'm not able to hear some of the words because of it.
Andhabhakts deeply disheartened 😭😭😭😭🤣🤣
😂😂
US Supreme Court, take note!
Dr Ambedkar admirably throws out the amendment brought about to insert these terms Secular and Socialist during the CA debates.
His reasons are astounding ones.
Therefore, these terms cannot form the basic structure.
May be the SC upheld the Tampered-Constitution.
Only from SC i come to know that Indira Ghandy was a Founding member of the Constitution.
Background music ki voice jyaada kyu h
If the constitution is so universal for all, why Nehru was incompetent to make it applicable to Kashmir also but allowing it to have a separate one?
This clearly shows the present constitution is a Hindu Constitution.
This can only mean that once the present demography goes, the constitution will see its demise.
Then why should have the term secular?
Let yi judges live in muslim area for 1 week then give decisions.not by living in secured quarters paid by tax by we
Good news sister 🇮🇳
BJP govt have done nothing good to talk about and hence they will bring up unnecessary issues to divert people's mind.
I am happy and relieved to hear the judgement of the Supreme court for retaining the words Secular and Socilist in the preamble of the Constitution..all Sanghis will be crying 😂😂😭😭😭
Ambedkar us wrong on many counts😊😊😊