The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@Abby-hu7vl koi Pakistan jaisa halat nhi hota motive of revolt was just to overthrow Britishers not to take over the power when they burnt british flag they hoisted Communist party and muslim league flag with tricolour
@@KartikTells Uske kehne ka matalab ye hai ki un Navy officers ko na wapas naukri Mili,na izzat Mila,na hi koi medal bss unko mamuli Vidhrohi batakar sant kar diya gya jabki uss samay ke Britian ke PM ne khud admit Kiya tah ki ye hi Karan tah unke Bharat ko chor ke jane ka. Kya wo log bss mamuli Vidhrohi hai? Kya un Navy officers ko Gandhi, Nehru, Jinaah se jada izzat nahi milini chaiye?
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
The naval revolt spread to Air force & Army resulted in getting our independence, since the Brits got jittery & concluded that the Indian forces are no more dependable. This thought was confirmed by Atlee exPM of Brit when he visited India in 1956. He made it clear that it was not Gandhiji & cong but only Armed forces revolt.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@DarkMasterEdits-Mashups I know it. You might have read the history but I have digested history. Question is whether you could understand the deep meaning embedded in my previous comment
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 there is always strong leader like tilak and veer savarkar and whole extremist groups who believed in armed revolution And did you know because of sardar patel they stopped So if their rebellion not stopped we will get independence much faster And also after that leader like patel will take control of them And Pakistan case is different Jinhaa want to make new country where as indian soldier want to independent india
That time all leaders were busy on got credit of freedom of india🇮🇳 so, they didn't want to share there credit with common sailor🚢 that's why any leader didn't support the Naval revolution 😡😡 A untold history of india🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 shame on that time leaders 🤬
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 Actually Britishers feared that if Indian soldiers got freedom through mutiny that gave a big insult to British Empire and it's hegemony of European Supremacy That's why after 1 month of that moment British Parliament passed a referendum of freedom of india So some credit of freedom went to this sailors 😃
Nicely drafted information One suggestion I want to put forward Kindly add date below tarikh for corresponding show, so that it will more easier to person who watches it in binge mode
Bahot hi achha episode 🌟👍....abhi tak ye samaj k bahar hai k Puri duniya me saab se crual and khooni hai Britishers unko kaise log saab se jyada gentlemen mante hai ...unho ne jitane atyachar kiye hai puri duniya me colony banak utana shayad french logo ne bhi nahi kiya ...
Naval mutiny was the reason why british left india. They had Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose's pic in hand. No ahimsa kicked british away kabhi nehi, ahimsa only extended british rule in India. Hope someday history books of independence is written again..
If Royal Indian Navy turned into a Revolution, then Partition could've been avoided, cause this was a Communally Inclusive mutiny, but only If Congress've supported it, but Congress and Sardar Patelji's response was disappointing.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
This video does not speak all about the great naval mutiny of 1946. The speaker did not even mention the names of 9 Indian rebel sailors who went to the gallows after the suppression of the mutiny. Secondly during the uprising the mutineers and common people of Bombay were holding the portrait of Netaji Subhash Bose. This signifies INA revolt had an impact on the morale of the mutineers. The speaker deliberately tried to hide the INA connection. The Naval mutiny was much more in conflict with the British empire than what the speaker had told. Shame on the Congress leaders who did not give recognition to the naval mutineers as freedom fighters. Utpal Dutta had written a play named ' Kallol ' based on naval mutiny but the Congressmen had disrupted the stage while the play was being staged in kolkata in 60s decade.
Humare vatan ki azadi ki ladai 1857 me sipahio ne hi ki aur 90 saal baad navsena ke bahudur sipaheo ke vidrod se khatam Vidrod se shuru vidroh par khatam Jai Hind
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
All people should question the intention of Sardar Patel ..He always chooses the power ...His contribution to divide the nation can not be forgotten ..
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Jin logo ko respect milni chahiye thi unko neglect kr diya gya. Shame on everyone who was in power at that time. Baat discipline ki nhi thi wo log desh k liye khade hue koi self interest ya ulterior motive k liye revolt nhi kiya tha.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 OK.nice informations. apart from that the freedom fighters (not rebels) of both INA & 1946's naval uprising were not given the proper justice at all by the Nehru govt, neither in terms of respect not in the page of history. in the weighing scale of the valour, their contributions were much higher than some political leaders of that time.
It's the irony....your informative presentation always uphold Gandhiji , but this historical mutiny can open all eyes regarding the true fact of Independence...this mutiny has been made underrated deliberately to uphold something different
पर इस लिए तो देश आजाद हुआ था । सैन्य विद्रोह के कारण । तब 40 हजार अंग्रेज 25 लाख भारत की सेना थी । अगर भारतीय मना कर देते सेना जॉइन करने के लिए तो अंग्रेज कब के चले गए होते।
Navy revolt was ignited by Azaad hind fauj but congressi lallantop tried best to cover that. Ab itne sare nau sainiko mein kitne sainik kitno ko gandhi nehru patel ke alwawa angrejon ko bhi khat likhe hi honge woh bhi highlight kar dete thoda ahinsa wadi ho jata, haha... actual history ko badalne ka ye accha tarika hai. Asli wajah ko side mein rakh kar idhar udhar ki incidents ko highlight karna. Yes leader ki baat manenge sahi hai lekin is andolan hua tha azad hind fauj je solidarity mein. Mamu lallantop ke writer/editor usi baat ko daba diye :-D
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
sorry, sir but please stop mentioning dakshin and Uttar Bhartiya separately we can change our words like india's southern states and northern states. or Uttar ya dakshin me rehne vale the words that are used here doesn't look appropriate. by the way the video is informative. ☺️
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Sir Please Tell Truth To US Royal India Navy Ka Sth Isliye Ni Diya Gya Tha Ki Transfer Of Power In Logo Ko Chaiye Tha Muslim League Or Congress Ko Agr Royal Indian Navy Ki Wjh Se Ajadi mil gyi hoti toh in logo ko credit ni milta or ye log desh ko dikha ni skte the ki dekho hmne ajadi dilai or kbhi desh ka batwara ni hua rhta or yhi in logo ne S.C Bose ke sath Kiya
Everything is right but the naval rising is mainly because of INA and the supreme leader of our country Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. You could have shown the real and hidden fact of this movement. Start telling the reality of freedom and the man behind it. Subhas Chandra Bose.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
I think I understand the point of Sardar Patel of not supporting Naval mutiny. British after WW2 didn't had neither capability nor will power to sustain an empire. They even planned to close the garrison of Singapore, Clement Atlee was a stupid buffoon didn't knew what he was talking about. I think Naval mutiny was too little too late from the armed forces in the fight for Independence.
ज्यादा खुश ना हो माफी वीर सावरकर का कोई हाथ नहीं है आजादी में और यह भविष्य के लिए कदम उठाना जरूरी था पटेल जी ने खुद ने मना किया था नेहरू को जाने के लिए,
भारत का इतिहास अच्छे से पढ़ो और समझो तो पता चलता है कि हमने हमेशा दोगले और नकारा को ही भगवान खुदा सब माना है, असली चेहरा और हीरो जो भी थे आजादी के उनको तो कोई सम्मान नहीं दिया गया है
agar nehru angrez virodhi aandolano me shamil hone ke bawajud bhi PM ban sakte he to phir Navy ke sipahi aur Azad hind fauj ke log army nevy me wapas rehire kyu nahi kiye jaa sakte?? sawal to valid he... uska jawab yeh he ki nehru etc aandolan ka dhong kar rahe the... aur aap sach much ka aandolan kar rahe the...
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Of course, Discipline is the biggest single virtue and must virtue in arm forces. It’s even a more important than nationalism. Without disciplined arm forces no country can survive.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions. Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 British plan to quit India in June 8 1948 why he transfer the power in 15th Aug 1947 before 9 month reason is INA revolt across the country
@@pratyuskumardas9252 Apna Comment phelay Phado dhyan Say Tum kah rahay Britishers 1948 mai transfer of power kartey... Ina ki wajah say 1947 mai hua.... 1948 mai yadi hota toh india ki partition nahi hoti kyunki jinaah ki life kuch hi month bachi thi Uskay TB thi
मैं जान चाहत हु लल्लनटॉप की सोच क्या है उत्तर भारत औऱ दक्षिण भारत के लोगो के बारे मैं क्या उत्तर भारत औऱ दक्षिण भारत भी होता है भारत तो 1 ही और वो बस भारत है मुझे बहुत बुरा लगा है इतने अच्छे विषे पे अपने गलत सब्दो का प्रयोग किया
![[DRIP] ‘CLIK CLAK’ PREVIEW](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bcxkcOSbpac/mqdefault.jpg)
This story I want since a long time....... Thanks 🙏
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
ये तो 100% सत्य है की आजदी कुछ गिने चुने नामी नेताओ के दम पर नही मिली है कितने ही वीर जवानों को आजादी मिलने के बाद भी आजादी नही मिल सकी 😞
ऐसे महान कहानियो को इतिहास में से गायब कर दिया गया
Nice information sir... Books reference bhi batana chahiye. Jis se aur reference mil jata jo video me cover karna possible na ho paya ho.
Very Sad to know our leaders ( then) have not supported these brave soldiers.
Leaders set the good example nahi to pakistan ki tarah halat hote but after freedome unahe jobs par rakhana chahiye tha
@@Abby-hu7vl koi Pakistan jaisa halat nhi hota motive of revolt was just to overthrow Britishers not to take over the power when they burnt british flag they hoisted Communist party and muslim league flag with tricolour
@@Abby-hu7vlthen why gandhi used to recruit indian soldiers in ww1?
Very good Lallantop.Ajke agniveer aur baki yuvaon ko desh ki hakikat se parichit karane ka is se behtar madhyam nahi ho sakta. 🙏
Ooooo dada nikhil jee. Itni mehnat dekh k bhot khushi hoti hai.
You always provide usefull information 🙏❣️
Power of #INA 🇮🇳🇮🇳 Jay Hind... 🔥
हिंदुस्तानियों द्वारा अपनी आजादी के लिए उठाई गई आवाज को विद्रोह नाम देकर हमारे राजनेताओं ने खुद को महान साबित करने में कोई कसर नहीं छोड़ी।
Vidroh ka arth kya hota h?
@@KartikTells Uske kehne ka matalab ye hai ki un Navy officers ko na wapas naukri Mili,na izzat Mila,na hi koi medal bss unko mamuli Vidhrohi batakar sant kar diya gya jabki uss samay ke Britian ke PM ne khud admit Kiya tah ki ye hi Karan tah unke Bharat ko chor ke jane ka. Kya wo log bss mamuli Vidhrohi hai? Kya un Navy officers ko Gandhi, Nehru, Jinaah se jada izzat nahi milini chaiye?
@@AmanRaj-xi2zd Achi tarha aapne baat ko Samajhya thank you.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 sir samjhane ke liye shukriya 🙏
Aap bahut hi gajab ki jankari dete h aapko very very thanks
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Very sad for nevy soilders.we all support mr.balai Dutta & supporters and hai hai sarder v.patel & co.
ये सब स्वतंत्र सेनांनी थे और इन्हे नौकरी में वापस शामिल कर लेना चाहिये था ❤
Untold histories presentation was good and I like the sentence that you said के बाहेर जाके तो सब भारतीय हो क्या यही पुछंते है पहले
The naval revolt spread to Air force & Army resulted in getting our independence, since the Brits got jittery & concluded that the Indian forces are no more dependable. This thought was confirmed by Atlee exPM of Brit when he visited India in 1956. He made it clear that it was not Gandhiji & cong but only Armed forces revolt.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
बीबीसी इंटरव्यू में अम्बेडकर ने बॉस को रीज़न माना इंडिपेंडेंस के लिए
@@vishalrajyaguru2597read about safety vault theory
@@DarkMasterEdits-Mashups I know it. You might have read the history but I have digested history. Question is whether you could understand the deep meaning embedded in my previous comment
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 there is always strong leader like tilak and veer savarkar and whole extremist groups who believed in armed revolution
And did you know because of sardar patel they stopped
So if their rebellion not stopped we will get independence much faster
And also after that leader like patel will take control of them
And Pakistan case is different
Jinhaa want to make new country where as indian soldier want to independent india
That time all leaders were busy on got credit of freedom of india🇮🇳
so, they didn't want to share there credit with common sailor🚢
that's why any leader didn't support the Naval revolution 😡😡
A untold history of india🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
shame on that time leaders 🤬
It’s known history. Problem is, that you are ignorant.
Garhwal rifle refused to fire on Indians during quit India movement. Another history for you.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Neta ne kal bhi chahiya banaya aaj bhi banate hai 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
All the leaders were corrupt at that time power.jai hind.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 Actually Britishers feared that if Indian soldiers got freedom through mutiny that gave a big insult to British Empire and it's hegemony of European Supremacy
That's why after 1 month of that moment British Parliament passed a referendum of freedom of india
So some credit of freedom went to this sailors 😃
Thanks
Nicely drafted information
One suggestion I want to put forward
Kindly add date below tarikh for corresponding show, so that it will more easier to person who watches it in binge mode
Unconditional Love and support for you ❣️💙❣️💙 Dear Garima Mishra Katyayan 💙❣️💙❣️
If India and Pakistan were united, then no power on this earth could saved themselves from United India.
🇧🇩
Ye story is se pehle kabhi nhi suni thankyou 🙏🙏🙏
Ty for the information about our bravery n discipline sir
Beautiful presentation .
Bahot hi achha episode 🌟👍....abhi tak ye samaj k bahar hai k Puri duniya me saab se crual and khooni hai Britishers unko kaise log saab se jyada gentlemen mante hai ...unho ne jitane atyachar kiye hai puri duniya me colony banak utana shayad french logo ne bhi nahi kiya ...
. लल्लनटॉप की मेहनत और योग्यता प्रशंसा के योग्य
Very good analysis.
salute to our brave naval officers.
Officers nahi sailors ne vidroh kiya tha officers British ki gulami kar rahe tha agrejo ka sath de rahe the.
100% सत्य है की आजदी कुछ गिने चुने नामी नेताओ के दम पर नही मिली है
Thanks upsc ke liye important hai
Sir ,Nupur Patel jo ki gujrat chunav ke Reporting karti hai or said me AAP parti . ummed he lallantop khulkey bistar se bataiga.
Good episode
Tq sir......
शर्ट बहुत अच्छी है भाई आपकी
Naval mutiny was the reason why british left india. They had Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose's pic in hand.
No ahimsa kicked british away kabhi nehi, ahimsa only extended british rule in India. Hope someday history books of independence is written again..
Bhaiya..... Aapke pichhe jo jharokha hai.... Usme likhe ZZ ka kya matlab hai??
Make a video on direct action day.with out any manipulation
Very informative
Most useful for Students👩🎓
My Favourite show ....
nice...
If Royal Indian Navy turned into a Revolution, then Partition could've been avoided, cause this was a Communally Inclusive mutiny, but only If Congress've supported it, but Congress and Sardar Patelji's response was disappointing.
Good way to remove all the blames from Nehru gandhi
Lallan top shows Sardar as the main person here
He wasn't powerless as Right wing says . This is first time I heard that Patel stopped Nehru.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Very nice video
This video does not speak all about the great naval mutiny of 1946. The speaker did not even mention the names of 9 Indian rebel sailors who went to the gallows after the suppression of the mutiny. Secondly during the uprising the mutineers and common people of Bombay were holding the portrait of Netaji Subhash Bose. This signifies INA revolt had an impact on the morale of the mutineers. The speaker deliberately tried to hide the INA connection. The Naval mutiny was much more in conflict with the British empire than what the speaker had told. Shame on the Congress leaders who did not give recognition to the naval mutineers as freedom fighters. Utpal Dutta had written a play named ' Kallol ' based on naval mutiny but the Congressmen had disrupted the stage while the play was being staged in kolkata in 60s decade.
Fast comment❤❤❤ love LLtop
इस विद्रोह में हमारे गांव के एक व्यक्ति सामिल थे। वे बाद में हमारे गांव के अध्यक्ष बने। हमारे घर अक्सर आया करते थे।
Proud to be an Bengali
Huzzur tusi great ho
Whenever I heard the stories of our freedom fighter and rebels it feels boosebums in whole body
Good info
Humare vatan ki azadi ki ladai 1857 me sipahio ne hi ki aur 90 saal baad navsena ke bahudur sipaheo ke vidrod se khatam Vidrod se shuru vidroh par khatam Jai Hind
Good beginning...but a Rush Job! Obviously there is more...it deserves attention to detail and digging. I hope someone can do a deeper research!
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 apana yah faltu ghayan har comments ke sath batna band karo.
All people should question the intention of Sardar Patel ..He always chooses the power ...His contribution to divide the nation can not be forgotten ..
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Good night nikhil bhaiya
Sir up gds 2017 ka result aaj tak nhi aaya hai 5 year ho gye hai koi video banaye
Jin logo ko respect milni chahiye thi unko neglect kr diya gya. Shame on everyone who was in power at that time. Baat discipline ki nhi thi wo log desh k liye khade hue koi self interest ya ulterior motive k liye revolt nhi kiya tha.
Agree
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 Us samay ke top leaders sare kaiya satta lolup the.
Kl aur aaj wala story phle suna rkha h na aapne?
Root cause was Azad Hind Fauj (INA) led by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 So you mean to say that British were already leaving? There was no role of Azad Hind Fauj?
Discipline? What you said? can lallantop measure, a mutiny for Nation's independence versus the Discipline?
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 OK.nice informations. apart from that the freedom fighters (not rebels) of both INA & 1946's naval uprising were not given the proper justice at all by the Nehru govt, neither in terms of respect not in the page of history. in the weighing scale of the valour, their contributions were much higher than some political leaders of that time.
It's the irony....your informative presentation always uphold Gandhiji , but this historical mutiny can open all eyes regarding the true fact of Independence...this mutiny has been made underrated deliberately to uphold something different
Jai hind
पर इस लिए तो देश आजाद हुआ था ।
सैन्य विद्रोह के कारण । तब 40 हजार अंग्रेज 25 लाख भारत की सेना थी ।
अगर भारतीय मना कर देते सेना जॉइन करने के लिए तो अंग्रेज कब के चले गए होते।
Navy revolt was ignited by Azaad hind fauj but congressi lallantop tried best to cover that. Ab itne sare nau sainiko mein kitne sainik kitno ko gandhi nehru patel ke alwawa angrejon ko bhi khat likhe hi honge woh bhi highlight kar dete thoda ahinsa wadi ho jata, haha... actual history ko badalne ka ye accha tarika hai. Asli wajah ko side mein rakh kar idhar udhar ki incidents ko highlight karna. Yes leader ki baat manenge sahi hai lekin is andolan hua tha azad hind fauj je solidarity mein. Mamu lallantop ke writer/editor usi baat ko daba diye :-D
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
आधार कार्ड को voter id,pan कार्ड और हर चीज में लिंक करके सरकार आपका हर Information ले सके और अपना कण्ट्रोल में रख सके,
Vishavnath Basu K Letter Ne Saabit Kiya K Nehru Ji Ne Sach Me Aazadi Ki Ladaai Me 14.5 Saal Angrezon Ki Jail Ki Sazza Kaati Thi.....
❤
sorry, sir
but please stop mentioning dakshin and Uttar Bhartiya separately
we can change our words like india's southern states and northern states.
or Uttar ya dakshin me rehne vale
the words that are used here doesn't look appropriate.
by the way the video is informative. ☺️
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Sir Please Tell Truth To US Royal India Navy Ka Sth Isliye Ni Diya Gya Tha Ki Transfer Of Power In Logo Ko Chaiye Tha Muslim League Or Congress Ko Agr Royal Indian Navy Ki Wjh Se Ajadi mil gyi hoti toh in logo ko credit ni milta or ye log desh ko dikha ni skte the ki dekho hmne ajadi dilai or kbhi desh ka batwara ni hua rhta or yhi in logo ne S.C Bose ke sath Kiya
My father sardar dayal singh mutiny 1946 talwar ship royal indian navy
Oracle company ne indian railway ko riswat kyun diya ? Ispar news kyun nhi dikhate ???
Everything is right but the naval rising is mainly because of INA and the supreme leader of our country Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. You could have shown the real and hidden fact of this movement.
Start telling the reality of freedom and the man behind it. Subhas Chandra Bose.
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Movie bani chaye..
Ist time lallantop steal heart lekin patel jee ka plot galat hai
I think I understand the point of Sardar Patel of not supporting Naval mutiny. British after WW2 didn't had neither capability nor will power to sustain an empire. They even planned to close the garrison of Singapore, Clement Atlee was a stupid buffoon didn't knew what he was talking about. I think Naval mutiny was too little too late from the armed forces in the fight for Independence.
और फिर इस तरह हमे आजादी सिर्फ और सिर्फ गांधी ने दिलवाई🤫🤐
ज्यादा खुश ना हो माफी वीर सावरकर का कोई हाथ नहीं है आजादी में
और यह भविष्य के लिए कदम उठाना जरूरी था पटेल जी ने खुद ने मना किया था नेहरू को जाने के लिए,
भारत का इतिहास अच्छे से पढ़ो और समझो तो पता चलता है कि हमने हमेशा दोगले और नकारा को ही भगवान खुदा सब माना है, असली चेहरा और हीरो जो भी थे आजादी के उनको तो कोई सम्मान नहीं दिया गया है
Azadi mili bina Kharag Talwar kahne walo ke liye ye Eyeopner hai.
Please watch everyone Anuj Dhar Sir
I thin it's repeat, was shared last year too
क्या इसी तरह का व्यवहार अंग्रेज सेना के अधिकारी मेजर जैपाल के साथ भी किया गया था?
agar nehru angrez virodhi aandolano me shamil hone ke bawajud bhi PM ban sakte he to phir Navy ke sipahi aur Azad hind fauj ke log army nevy me wapas rehire kyu nahi kiye jaa sakte?? sawal to valid he... uska jawab yeh he ki nehru etc aandolan ka dhong kar rahe the... aur aap sach much ka aandolan kar rahe the...
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
Bengal hero
ਇਹਦਾ ਮਤਲਬ ਕਾਗਰਸੀ ਤੇ ਮੁਸਲਿਮ ਲੀਗ ਵਾਲੇ ਸੁਰੂ ਤੋ ਹੀ ਗਦਾਰ ਸਨ ਤੇ ਡਰਪੋਕ ਐਨੇ ਸਿਰਫ ਧਰਨੇ ਲਾ ਕੇ ਆਮ ਲੋਕਾ ਨੂੰ ਮਰਵਾ ਸਕਦੇ ਸੀ ਪਰ ਆਪ ਅੰਗਰੇਜਾ ਸਾਹਮਣੇ ਅਖ ਨੀ ਸੀ ਚੁਕ ਸਕਦੇ ਤਾ ਹੀ ਨੋਸੈਨਕਾ ਦੀ ਐਡੀ ਵੱਡੀ ਬਗਾਬਤ ਕਰਨ ਦੇ ਬਾਵਜੂਦ ਉਹਨਾ ਦੀ ਮਦਦ ਨਹੀ ਕਰ ਸਕੇ ਇਹਨਾ ਖਬਰਾ ਬਾਹਰ ਆਉਣ ਤੋ ਬਾਅਦ ਵੀ ਲੋਕ ਇਹਨਾ ਲੋਕਾ ਨੂੰ ਵੋਟਾ ਪਾਈ ਗਏ ਤੇ ਸ ਪਟੇਲ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਜ ਵੀ ਮੁਰਤੀਆ ਬਣਾ ਕੇ ਲੋਹ ਪੁਰਸ ਪਤਾ ਨੀ ਕੀ ਸੋਚਕੇ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਨੇ ਅਸਲ ਵਿਚ ਇਹ ਲੋਕ ਕੁਰਸੀ ਖਾਤਰ ਕਿਨਾ ਵੀ ਗਿਰ ਸਕਦੇ ਸੀ
Marshal Race Means Punjabis.....
Proud 2 Be Punjabi 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
चलो इतना तो लोग बोलने लगे की आजादी सिर्फ गांधी नेहरू ने नही दिलाया । उसमे आईएनए, हमारे सैनिको , कांत्रिकारियो का अहम योगदान था ।
આભાર 👍🙏🙏🙏💯
Wah kya perfaction kiya hai haq nahin mila nuhru ji se appeal ki thi Kabhi yeh episode karo rss 3time banned kyun hua
पुलिस भी हिंदुस्तानी रहे होगे 😔 ,, अपने ही अपनो को मरने चले थे😔
Aur NCRT ke class-8 ke kitab me ise newspaper article ke tarah side me diya gaya he.😠😠😠😠😠😠😠😠
Balai chandra dutta❤ in bangaliyo ne
Ye angrezon ki mansikta Indian forces mein aaj bhi jinda hai .....bas aab koi bagawat openly nahi hoti
Didn't know that even this revolt was started by a Bengali.
Pjn the great pm of ind 🇮🇳🙏
Aaj bhi same condition hai
नुपुर पटेल को हटाया जाय गुजरात चुनाव कि रिपोटिंग से ,नुपुर पटेल -आप- समर्थक है वो कभी निस्पक्क्ष पत्रकारिता कभी कर ही नही सकती
Satya sada kadwa hota hai bangal or delhi ke chunaw mai bhi BJP ko godi media jita raha tha .
Only 1 name Subhash Chandra Bose
It was gandhi not patel who is asked to surrender.
Of course, Discipline is the biggest single virtue and must virtue in arm forces. It’s even a more important than nationalism. Without disciplined arm forces no country can survive.
U r f rss
India got freedom because of Netaji not for gandhi
The reality is, Indian top leadership were already informed about British plan to exit India in the shortest possible time. Probably they knew even the date of independence. And they knew that after independence indiscipline state apparatus like arm forces can endanger the very establishment of Indian state. And therefore they were not in any mood to support any movement or upheaval in country. The situation in shot was totally different from 1942 and before. So the leaders were absolutely right in their decisions.
Secondly the British propaganda of considering the naval upheaval as the reason of India’s independence is totally misleading and has hidden agenda of destabilising Indian state at that time. And they did it by sponsoring and designing many moments like Dravida moment,, Language-based state demands and the partition of India itself.
@@vishalrajyaguru2597 British plan to quit India in June 8 1948 why he transfer the power in 15th Aug 1947 before 9 month reason is INA revolt across the country
@@pratyuskumardas9252 1948 mai Jinnah mar jata aur india ki partition nahi hoti.... Jinnah ko Tb tha
@@harshrahil8490 partition 1947 mein hua tha 1948 mein nhin 😅
@@pratyuskumardas9252 Apna Comment phelay Phado dhyan Say Tum kah rahay Britishers 1948 mai transfer of power kartey... Ina ki wajah say 1947 mai hua.... 1948 mai yadi hota toh india ki partition nahi hoti kyunki jinaah ki life kuch hi month bachi thi Uskay TB thi
मैं जान चाहत हु लल्लनटॉप की सोच क्या है उत्तर भारत औऱ दक्षिण भारत के लोगो के बारे मैं क्या उत्तर भारत औऱ दक्षिण भारत भी होता है भारत तो 1 ही और वो बस भारत है
मुझे बहुत बुरा लगा है इतने अच्छे विषे पे अपने गलत सब्दो का प्रयोग किया