Forms of Validity in Research and Statistics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2024
  • In this video, we'll learn about three commonly-discussed forms of validity: content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity. We'll also discuss the relationship between reliability and validity.

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @odofinfunmilayo8098
    @odofinfunmilayo8098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Wow , this is extraordinary, I'm having an exam on PSYCHOMETRICS and this is by far very helpful. Thank you again . 2021

    • @aw4724
      @aw4724 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pub Med is no longer a reliable source of research. Far too many ill funded "studies". Particularly in the arena of wireless radiation dangers. There are some telling the truth and some not. Wifi poses the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. I have lived this for 15 years, in addition to being in contact with thousands of people whose lives are now thoroughly ruined over it b/c they can't go anywhere in society anymore. Can't work, can't go back to school, can't get on a plane to visit family, etc.

  • @HannahUWA
    @HannahUWA 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This was so helpful and your examples really highlighted the concepts.

  • @iradahmm
    @iradahmm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you so much! Finally a decent video. All the other videos are created by trolls who want to play with your sanity

    • @aw4724
      @aw4724 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pub Med is no longer a reliable source of research. Far too many ill funded "studies". Particularly in the arena of wireless radiation dangers. There are some telling the truth and some not. Wifi poses the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. I have lived this for 15 years, in addition to being in contact with thousands of people whose lives are now thoroughly ruined over it b/c they can't go anywhere in society anymore. Can't work, can't go back to school, can't get on a plane to visit family, etc.

  • @readinglife5505
    @readinglife5505 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much.Your voice is like melody and the way you teach is really great and interesting.Thanks i understood the concepts👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @HarryJayCavite
    @HarryJayCavite 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You explain very well, great job, Prof. Thank you for this video. If I may ask, do you have some manual calculations of construct validity measures: convergent (composite reliability, average variance extracted)? Thank you.

  • @shubhankargupta4177
    @shubhankargupta4177 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation. Thanks

  • @ralphsac
    @ralphsac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank You Sir. You're a savior

  • @rominalaudiaz8444
    @rominalaudiaz8444 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant video, thank you!

  • @farwaali3353
    @farwaali3353 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you this is very helpful my 6 page chapter couldn't help me but your 9 minute video did thanks again 😊

  • @Aninditazahra9
    @Aninditazahra9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for clear explanation

  • @brownsford7501
    @brownsford7501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the video

  • @rajendrak.c.8664
    @rajendrak.c.8664 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you professor from Nepal

  • @nasserdana
    @nasserdana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about convergent validity ? Discriminate validity ? Where do they stand ?

  • @karthikasn6545
    @karthikasn6545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent professor..regards from India!

    • @aw4724
      @aw4724 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pub Med is no longer a reliable source of research. Far too many ill funded "studies". Particularly in the arena of wireless radiation dangers. There are some telling the truth and some not. Wifi poses the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. I have lived this for 15 years, in addition to being in contact with thousands of people whose lives are now thoroughly ruined over it b/c they can't go anywhere in society anymore. Can't work, can't go back to school, can't get on a plane to visit family, etc.

  • @nipuniekanayake216
    @nipuniekanayake216 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Really helpful❤

  • @ZA-ch5ur
    @ZA-ch5ur 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well explained

  • @sofiaviola4796
    @sofiaviola4796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this very clear explanation!

    • @aw4724
      @aw4724 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pub Med is no longer a reliable source of research. Far too many ill funded "studies". Particularly in the arena of wireless radiation dangers. There are some telling the truth and some not. Wifi poses the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. I have lived this for 15 years, in addition to being in contact with thousands of people whose lives are now thoroughly ruined over it b/c they can't go anywhere in society anymore. Can't work, can't go back to school, can't get on a plane to visit family, etc.

  • @thabangmoloi3772
    @thabangmoloi3772 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u from South Africa

  • @aminakhan4321
    @aminakhan4321 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Splendid job😍

  • @aaronkoh4567
    @aaronkoh4567 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, could I ask, if I have an experiment that seeks to measure which burger is more popular, through a forced choice survey that only allows a selection of one burger,
    Would that affect construct validity, considering that I have failed to account that someone may like both burgers equally much, or may dislike both burgers?
    Would this pertain to construct validity? Or internal validity?

  • @kevinnguyen4972
    @kevinnguyen4972 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you so much for your hard work. I really appreciate all of your videos. loveeeeee from FL :))

    • @aw4724
      @aw4724 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pub Med is no longer a reliable source of research. Far too many ill funded "studies". Particularly in the arena of wireless radiation dangers. There are some telling the truth and some not. Wifi poses the greatest threat to human health that humanity has ever faced. I have lived this for 15 years, in addition to being in contact with thousands of people whose lives are now thoroughly ruined over it b/c they can't go anywhere in society anymore. Can't work, can't go back to school, can't get on a plane to visit family, etc.

  • @nonal4223
    @nonal4223 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great explanation thanks 🌟🌟

  • @TheHermit2013
    @TheHermit2013 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this!

  • @olivianicastro5107
    @olivianicastro5107 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what is the step if your CVI is low? Do you revise based on feedback and resend a CVI tool again to more experts?

  • @PURNAMILIND
    @PURNAMILIND 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a ton sir

  • @leonyannpruna1925
    @leonyannpruna1925 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you sir!..can I have some of your examples to my report?..you explained it very well

  • @kamalbenamor5267
    @kamalbenamor5267 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot

  • @suleimanidrisahmad9453
    @suleimanidrisahmad9453 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So which of the Criterion and Content is external and which is internal validity?

  • @shahdabuahmad7272
    @shahdabuahmad7272 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you

  • @kossonouprunelle7576
    @kossonouprunelle7576 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For categorical variables (nominal and ordinal), is factor analysis or PCA better for construct validity?

    • @jamunavinod9783
      @jamunavinod9783 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for this wonderful video. It was such a relief to understand the facts so well explained. Blessed are your students

  • @shathaabu-alnadi6579
    @shathaabu-alnadi6579 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @vivekkumar-py6kp
    @vivekkumar-py6kp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good

  • @leyougetabebetaye7232
    @leyougetabebetaye7232 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thankd