The MS-21 - RUSSIA's Boeing 737 MAX Alternative
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มิ.ย. 2024
- The aircraft is set to be the country’s answer to the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A320 due to its aircraft performance characteristics and cost-effectiveness. Its main advantages are advanced aerodynamics and the newest engines along with the extended application of composite materials.
►All Documentaries: • All Videos
►Subscribe and hit the bell: / @science-channel
►Other "Monster Engineering": • Engineering - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![ทัศนศึกษาโรงงานผลิตโค้ก [THAI/ENG SUB]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M9y-TJBNem0/mqdefault.jpg)
That is a joke, cartoon presentation of someone' sweet dreams. The real thing will either never fly or it will be the same failure as previous Russian aircraft Shitjet 100.
Aerodynamics does not matter when the engine is weak, ineffective and likely to break. The same story is about everywhere - from materials to be used, to electronics, optics, and avionics. Weak, ineffective and likely to break.
The biggest hope of Russian air-industry is Chinese company Great Wall. When China starts to produce civilian airplanes, they will be imported, relabeled (just like automobiles right now) and then will fly proudly carrying the Russian name MS-22.
Мамкин эксперт!!!
устаревшие сведения. Самолет готов, проходят летные испытания, уже сделано 10 самолетов. Авионика российская, двигатели тоже. Дальше будет серийное производство
typical yankee being jealous or Ukranian being angry that Russia is winning the war
طائرة صنعت واما صهيوني لا قوة. زوال كيان مبرمج لا رجع فيه
А неплохо предыдущие мультики вас обстреливают, да?))
Update: due to sanctions, they stopped using Pratt and Whitney engines. Now they use only PD-14 (ПД-14).
Due to sanction, they can neither build nor sell a plane that no one really wanted anyway... This is a C919 but with Aeroflot logo. The only Russian part inside it is the vodka for the passengers.
Good to produce on their own to get more freedom from the hostile environment
@@TheNefastor You are right.
@@TheNefastor No it's not, they don't even have the same dimensions. Likewise different engines, cockpit, uses different materials, has multiple current sizes unlike the C919, etc.
It seems the MC-21 actually uses *less* foreign components/suppliers than the C919, for better or worse.
Just because they look alike doesn't inherently mean anything, current planes in general barely look any different.
It's not clear how much, if any, collaboration there has been. Obviously Russia has it's own long history of manufacturing aircraft.
@@DoubleMonoLR you shouldn't assume people are ignorant and can be lied to easily. Both place *have* the exact same dimension and payload capacity, at 19 metric tons. The Russian is slightly bigger but only to accommodate larger fuel tanks and give it more range. And the only significant difference in western component sourcing is that the Russians are using a domestic engine (for better of worse, as you said)
Moreover, the history of Russian airplane design includes very few civilian passenger planes, especially if you don't count military planes converted for airline use. That's why they used a lot of western input.
Bottom line, in every way, MC21 == C919.
I wish big commercial success to MC21 airplane and the whole Russia!
Мы бы в России тоже хотели бы коммерческого успеха, но как показывают последние события, честной мировой конкуренции не существует, всем кто захочет купить этот самолёт США тут же начнёт грозить санкциями, так что на огромные продажи за рубеж пока нет расчёта, но нам и самим этот самолёт очень нужен, помимо перелётов, его производство даёт большой старт многим компаниям занимающимся высокотехнологичным производством.
@@s7ven48 да нам он самим нужен,внутри страны его потребность не одна сотня.
Even with the sanctions imposed by the West on Russia as a result of the invasion of Ukraine, maintenance of the PowerJet SaM-146 engines of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft was not stopped.
According to the Russian newspaper Kommersant, the maintenance, repair and overhaul of the engine, which has Western components, were not affected by the increase in the aircraft's flight hours and by the lack of participation in the process by Safran, the French company that developed the equipment. together with the Russian NPO Saturn.
United Engine Corporation (UEC) said that 32 of the 314 engines belonging to the Sukhoi Superjet 100 currently in operation are in need of repairs. The state-owned company responsible for the production of aeronautical engines still does not have the capacity to carry out all the necessary maintenance work, although it guarantees that it will be able to cope with the situation.
Sources from the airlines cited by Kommersant doubt the viability of the plans and do not rule out that a large part of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 fleet will be inoperative in the coming months.
Even with the sanctions imposed by the West on Russia as a result of the invasion of Ukraine, maintenance of the PowerJet SaM-146 engines of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft was not stopped.
According to the Russian newspaper Kommersant, the maintenance, repair and overhaul of the engine, which has Western components, were not affected by the increase in the aircraft's flight hours and by the lack of participation in the process by Safran, the French company that developed the equipment. together with the Russian NPO Saturn.
United Engine Corporation (UEC) said that 32 of the 314 engines belonging to the Sukhoi Superjet 100 currently in operation are in need of repairs. The state-owned company responsible for the production of aeronautical engines still does not have the capacity to carry out all the necessary maintenance work, although it guarantees that it will be able to cope with the situation.
Sources from the airlines cited by Kommersant doubt the viability of the plans and do not rule out that a large part of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 fleet will be inoperative in the coming months.
@@s7ven48 Даже несмотря на санкции, введенные Западом в отношении России в результате вторжения на Украину, техническое обслуживание двигателей PowerJet SaM-146 самолета Sukhoi Superjet 100 не было остановлено.
По данным российской газеты "Коммерсант", на проведение работ по техническому обслуживанию и ремонту двигателя, имеющего западные комплектующие, не повлияло увеличение налета самолета и отсутствие участия в процессе французской компании Safran, которая Оборудование разработало совместно с российским НПО «Сатурн».
В Объединенной двигателестроительной корпорации (ОДК) заявили, что 32 из 314 двигателей Sukhoi Superjet 100, находящихся в эксплуатации, нуждаются в ремонте. Государственная компания, ответственная за производство авиационных двигателей, до сих пор не имеет возможности выполнить все необходимые работы по техническому обслуживанию, хотя и гарантирует, что сможет справиться с ситуацией.
Источники в авиакомпаниях, на которые ссылается "Ъ", сомневаются в жизнеспособности планов и не исключают, что значительная часть парка Sukhoi Superjet 100 в ближайшие месяцы выйдет из строя.
The information is outdated. There will be no PW-1400 engines. The 73051 and 73055 boards on PD-14 engines fly in full for certification. PD-35 and PD-8 gas generators have been assembled and delivered to customers.
thanks for your input
Update: PD-8 has been certified and went to production. Full engine I mean.
It is going to be used on ssj100 and some other aircraft like be200 amphibious plane etc
It’s actually called the MS-21, as the “C” is merely the Russian Cyrillic for “S”.
thanks ! i will fix it
@@science-channelMS-21 !!!
@@Artem_38. Masyanya
So what is the difference between с and ш ?
@@thecoin5394 с is “s”, and ш is “sh”
14:29 actually a MS-21 with PD-14 engines is already flying for more than a year
Keep it up Russians, you have the best aerospace technologies, and you have three passengers jets industries but USA has only one such industry. I wish you all the best Russian engineers and coworkers.
Even with the sanctions imposed by the West on Russia as a result of the invasion of Ukraine, maintenance of the PowerJet SaM-146 engines of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft was not stopped. The state-owned company responsible for the production of aeronautical engines still does not have the capacity to carry out all the necessary maintenance work, although it guarantees that it will be able to cope with the situation.
According to the Russian newspaper Kommersant, the maintenance, repair and overhaul of the engine, which has Western components, were not affected by the increase in the aircraft's flight hours and by the lack of participation in the process by Safran, the French company that developed the equipment. together with the Russian NPO Saturn.
Three Russian aircraft manufacturers each making large investments in developing different aircraft that might compete with each other in a relatively small market isn't a recipe for success. There are reasons why very large scale and expensive manufacturing sectors tend to become monopolies. Large-scale companies keep getting more efficient because they have the large-scale money to invest in the most efficient production equipment. Avoiding wasteful duplication of efforts by forming the United Aircraft Corporation was a wise idea.
Ehm... ever heard of Airbus, Embraer and Dassault?
Engineers? 😂, do you have anything around you made in Russia?😂😂😂 they still aren’t able to produce even electric Windows they still aren’t able to produce or air cond for their own cars😂 Half of Russia are still shitting in a holes having no water supply at their houses
@@jurgenschmidt75 If US tech are so awesome why does the US have to beg the Russians to take their astronauts to space? Not so funny now, is it? 😆😆😆
Russia is restoring production of the four-engine Il-96:
"The new experimental Il-96-400M, created as part of the Il-96 family aircraft modernization program, is being prepared for the first flight (07.06.23). The aircraft is equipped with modern Russian avionics equipment, including a new avionics complex and other systems and components.
The lengthened fuselage makes the aircraft more spacious and attractive to operators. Previously, only the Il-96-300 was produced in the passenger version."
So the problem with foreign components in the equipment on the MS-21 is also being solved, and these developments are used in the updated Il-96.
It will be produced just to fill the gap in big long range planes and make constructors and factories work until creation of 2 engine version will be completed
400M already never will take off
Программу свернули
il96-400 with 2 engine PD-35
Actually the il96 was designed to be 2 engine but they had to rebuild it to use 4 engines because of international certification for transcontinental flight
@@GalovaNo
I am amazed how advanced Russian civil aviation is
I'm amazed you could post that rubbish
👍👌
’ll surprise you, but Russian civil aviation is a pale shadow of the USSR. The USSR at one time, without international cooperation, occupied about 30% of the global civil aviation market.
it never was
@@AEfsaenti, я вас удивлю, но в СССР входило 15 республик, в каждой из которых были предприятия и конструкторские бюро, на которых разрабатывались и собирались самолёты в тесной кооперации друг с другом. А сейчас Россия собирает самолёты одна.
Good thing they didn't "depend" on P&W for GTF engines. Look at the disaster the GTFs are causing recently. Hundreds of aircraft out for repairs. That PD14 looks right at home on the Il-76 too.
So happy to see Russians plane industry reborn.
Who will buy? Even former soviet nations won't buy that. Its not for nothing they all buy boeing and airbus.
@@YellowGun114 what if United States and Europe put sanctions on other countries????
MS-21 can be produced in countries like India, China, Brazil, Saudi Arab.
Price tag is 20% lower than Airbus and Boing
@genem895 If you are not a war monger and a disruptor of peace, why be scared of sanctions. China will not build that. They have their own program. That plane will only fly in Russia.
@@YellowGun114 Everyone besides 30 countries out of all, and maybe even those like independent profit-oriented airlines will purchase the plane. The World is not the USA and Europe
@@YellowGun114 The Russian airlines will buy them, as well as CIS countries. Just because you believe all the anti-Russian propaganda, that doesn't mean any of that BS it's true.
Congratulations to the Russian people.
You have the competence and means to develop any technology without having to rely on unfriendly nations specially arrogant United States of America!
"As soon as there is a need to increase the number of planes, additional equipment and assembly stations will be purchased." Russian airlines have supposedly ordered 300 MS-21s, so this is probably a good time for Russia to either do whatever would make the sanctions go away or start developing the technology to reverse engineer the Western equipment that has been used to make the small number of MS-21s that have been built up until now. Of course, if the sanctions did go away, Boeing, Airbus, and China would then be offering to sell Russia modern airplanes for lower costs than Russia would have to invest to make such planes for themselves.
@@johnstuartsmith Sanctions is the best driver for auto suficience, please keep sanctions in place.
Russia will work with friendly nations to develop whatever they need.
The true pioners of space flight need the incentive of sanctions to free themselves from selfish, arrogant and rapdly declining western nations!
@@fingerprint8479 Russia will never reach that number of producing 300 MC-21 aircraft. The market will not buy that number of Russian planes, even considering the likely purchases from the Russian domestic market, in addition to international economic sanctions. One other thing, quality and Russian technical assistance are known to be very bad.
It will cost Russia more to set up the production facilities to mass produce 300 MC-21s than the sales revenue will ever recover. Any videos I've seen where MC-21s are being assembled look like prototypes being hand-assembled in maintenance hangers rather than a mass production process. Boeing and Airbus already have monster factories and China will surely build some kind of efficient gigafactory to make the huge number of C919s that China will be produced for China's domestic market. (Which is 10 times larger than Russia's domestic market...) China will bang out 300 C919s faster and cheaper than Russia will ever make 300 MC-21s.
@@Baisfredec "Russia will never reach"
Americans and their subservient European poodles used to say the same about China! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
No one can fool reality!
Brilliantly designed 👍
But not brilliantly manufactured???
@@pauld2037 Why!? Those planes have been flying for 7 years without a single problem! Same with the SJ-100...the only problem comes from the French part of the engine, the Russian production part is flawless!
Yes Vlad-bot, whatever..... all the stolen airbus and boeings, 600+, why would Russia need them if it had a real aircraft industry? Answer, because its aircraft industry is utterly useless. No other reason to have all those foreign aircraft! And then stole them? Pure criminal behaviour!@
as a person from Russia, I want to say that the whole of Russia, and judging by the comments, in general, everyone is waiting for this liner. this is a huge breakthrough in technology, thanks to this project, a huge number of new plants were built for the production of domestic systems, from paint and tires to hydraulics. It is especially pleasing that we were able to make our own engine entirely from domestic parts. Yes, perhaps this is not the most economical airliner, and competing with the Airbus A321 Neo in terms of fuel consumption can be called competitors with a big stretch, but from a technological point of view, this aircraft is a breakthrough. the advantage for him is that he is very cheap. The exchange rate of the dollar and the ruble is constantly jumping, so the numbers are not accurate, but in dollars there are about 50,000,000. or 4,600,000,000 Russian rubles. it is 2 times cheaper than a321 and b737-800, there is nothing to say about max and neo. I really want the fully imported Ms 21, as promised, to fly for the first time in November. There are many hopes for this plane, so while we wait
Many Russians have high hopes for the MC-21. But realistically, they should appreciate the experience and wisdom of Viktor Chernomyrdin when he said: "We wanted the best, but it turned out like always...."
Yeah sure, like the latest breakthrough landing on the Moon 🤣🤣🤣 Good luck with that one, ruSSia 👌
@@johnstuartsmith bro, a fully imported board has not yet been fully created, and you are already talking some garbage
@@godfrapp_ and you go cry into the pillow. at least, unlike the United States, we launched a rocket to the moon, and you are only collecting it
@@godfrapp_ Landing of Luna-25 was sabotaged. Algorithm of landing there is well known and was executed multiple times in previous century.
The only 100% self sufficient country in the world
Respect Russia 👍
No we can't make bananas and coffee and need to import them
@@mrobocop1666мы пережили 1990-ые годы без бананов и кофе и ничего,живые
ha-ha. We dont have our own nails production, so i don't need to sat about computers, medicine, consumer products and so on.
@@Petriklan lier!
@@vertexsmith9405 I better know the country in which I live
Tell me a country that is capable of designing, manufacturing and assembling a passenger aircraft entirely from its own materials and spare parts? I only know one like this.
Россия. Локализация 95 процентов. Скоро будет 100
@@artemyf Именно так. Правильной дорогой идем товарищи)))
MC 21, semoga Garuda Indonesia bisa membeli ini 👍🏾
Если может 737 купить то мс-21 тем более
The synthetic viewing is useful for landing and turbulent weather. Smart!
Wonderful initiative! Best wishes for success.
Can't wait to see it in all continents
❤
Longliev Russia
Don’t hold your breath 🤣
Thank you very much!
Иностранцы, говорящие что этот самолет не будет нужен заграницей, посмотрите на карту! Россия огромная страна, она впервую очередь строит этот самолет для себя, полет с западной части страны на восток занимает до 9 часов полета!!! Нам плевать будут ли его покупать, главное чтобы мы летали на своих самолетах в своей стране!!! Все боинги и эйрбасы должны будут уйти с нашего рынка, мы будем летать на своих самолетах!!!
101% Soglasen s vami
Best wishes from Pakistan
Покупать его будут)китайцы, средняя азия,ближний восток,африка и южная америка! Важно делать качественный продукт и организовать хороший сервис
если купите двигатели авионику икрылья из композита .удачи в полетах вам и вашим родным
@@user-pg7nt1hl4u двигатели ПД-14, композитное крыло из российских материалов выпускает "аэрокомпозит"
Красивый, современный самолёт ! Желаю ему большого будущего!
Russian aviation technology has been top notch historically because the Russians and the Soviets always believed in over engineering their frontline machines.
The Soviets, sure.. Russians have failed pretty hard at creating new planes
Western... even Chinese aviation is far ahead than any Russian aircraft.
20 лет душили российскую промышленность наши западные "партнёры"
Super Russian liner 😊 very good
Indigo & Air India should have considered atleast 4 aircraft for their fleet for local air routes. Hope they consider.
They are not crazy enough to get involved with Russia. They have seen others’ experience with the Superjet and it wasn’t pretty.
I remember when this was a drawing and it was getting ready to go to production. I was very impressed with the design. To bad we have this stupid sanction. This aircraft will give airbus and Boeing a run for there money.
Same
100% agree with you, sanctions are for blind folded people, i would love to see one of these in my local ORD airport
Looks sharp! Well done, Russian engineering!
Can't wait to see it in mass production with fully Russian PD14 engine and avionics, in the airports and in the sky! Russia forward!
Russia!!! 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 Россия!!!
Production was postpointed from 2017 to 2025 now.
As you can see, it will never happen.
MS-21 is already flying around the country in the livery of the RUSSIA airline, they are working out reception and maintenance at various Russian airports ...
@@HADaevТитаническая работа по замене комплектующих из стран оказавшихся террористическими потребовала дополнительног времени, но слава Богу нашим инженерам удалось решить все сложные проблемы
@@s7ven48скажу больше, западные страны не просто террористические, это сатанинские страны, хозяин их сатана
Very interesting indeed. Thanks for sharing❤
your welcome
Ms 21 & super jet 100 are flourishing the abyss ❤
Russian Federation has in her hands a real contender in the most disputed single file interior cabin configuration, among B 737 family and A 320 aircrafts as well. It is just a matter of time when they start to develop their own electronics devices for the critic up dated avionics, and the same to the PD 14 engines. I see here a real commercial winner but one important fact where Russia cannot fail: Assistance and service programs for the costumers, a must in commercial aviation big business.
Поддержка и ремонт после продажи, это самое важное в программе производства этого самолёта. Все продумано до мелочей. Главное, какие страны будут готовы политически покупать данный самолёт. Иран будет покупать, Венесуэла, далее непонятно.
good job Russia, keep it up. lots of love from Pakistan.
Thank you! Lots of love to you, too!
Politics and Russia haters aside, it must be recognized that Russian aviation technology and design, is advanced and very efficient!
Russia produces some of the world's best aircraft!!!
Thats very funny
what's funny? Russian helicopters are used all over Africa and Latin America due to ease of maintenance. @@pauld2037
@@pauld2037then sit and laugh, while people move forward
Fall out of the sky more likely
@@pauld2037 be realistic, fair and unbiased. Russian aircraft have a reputation for being robust and effective. Sukhoi and Mig fighter aircraft are reknown for their maneuverability, agility and aerodynamic designs. Do not criticise without knowing facts first.
Looks stunning ,I hope some Western Airlines go for it .
Hope so
The 400 LR version with 256 seats and 12,000 km range could be an interesting replacement for airlines with ageing 757 or a small 787 8 Dreamliner with only 242 seats. Depending on options Dreamliner costs between $248 & $338 million but the MS 21 are only $72 to $91 million. Think about monthly mortgage costs savings for an airline. $922k vs $4.5 million (6%)
You haven't counted the savings on current maintenance yet. MS-21 promises to be extremely profitable in the frequency of routine maintenance and scheduled repairs.
unfortunately there is not enough power productions to make a lot of aircraft to sell outside the russia. First of all this craft is for use inside the russia.
Вы забыли китайский COMAC брат близнец МС-21, он будет дешевле.
@@user-sz7pb7zi4vсказать что comac брат близнец МС-21, это все равно, что сказать 737max - брат близнец a320neo. Абсолютно разные самолеты. И дешевле он будет(если будет) только для Китая.
PD 14 sounds attractive and romantic for the name of an aircraft engine.
i went from Australia to Irkutsk where they build them to see the planes being built, in Siberia , Russia, but i went to the wrong location and ended up in the factory itself, then security guys went off and put me in a room for an hour, scared the crap out of me ...
Lol. In Irkutsk also produced military fighter jets, it is closed classified territory. Next time try to visit Area 51 in Nevada, USA 😂
In last 10 years Russia several times caught western spies around own factories. Twice it was ambassadors (!) who came incognito in violation of international laws and tried to make secretly photos (counterintelligence published perfect videos about such trips and how they lied to police when was stopped). So, you was lucky!
P.S.
Actually real amount of produced fighter jets is unknown, all public numbers is lower than real. That’s why spies always sniffing around such factories.
@@juliap.5375 I'll never go to the USA. I don't buy American products or support anything American.
Bravo 🇷🇺
Awesome to see Russia getting back into Commercial Aircraft - Disappointed they didn't stick with the SU 35 look ... given the look of a MS-21 as opposed to a Commercial SU 35 at the airport which aircraft would you go for ??? I'd go for the SU 35 built to carry 150 passengers and Really Enjoy the Ride !!!
Supersonic flights are not economical. For subsonic airplains su-35 design is not efficient and not safe/stable
commercial su-35-like liner? o_O
А Боинг это тот который дверь потерял и ему эксплуатацию запретили ?😂
And still they have more deliveries of the 737 than all of the russian airliners combined. Which not even the Chinese want to buy
Bravo! I love everything Russian made stuffs.😊❤🎉
Great work good luck 👍
Muito bom. Força, Rússia.
Who determines the success or failure of a new plane is the market. Let's wait and then you tell me if the launch of that Russian plane was a success or a failure.
@@Baisfredec It will be produced for the Russian market, no other choice for Russia, so there will be hundreds of them regardless of foreign sells.
@@_Epsilon_ Well, a product like an airplane that is produced with this idea that it is only for the domestic market, is born a failure, will be produced no matter how bad it is and thus will never have quality and will have the fate of products with market reserve, very bad . And the Russian state enterprise will be yet another failure for the state to sustain. And so, as always happens with Russian products, they will never be offered on the world's shelves and Russia, as always, will remain a country that feeds failure and will sell and will end up selling its products to the penguins of Antarctica. Well, that's the failure mindset.
@@_Epsilon_ Russia does not have the technology to produce a modern commercial passenger aircraft with the same quality standards as those of the major aviation industries in the United States, Europe and the Brazilian Embraer. Let's look at the historical performance of the Russian industry:
The IL-96 model, whose only customers in 30 years were Cubana de Aviação and the Russian government, failed spectacularly, delivering only 30 units in its 31 years of production.
Let's take, for example, just two of Boeing's models with customers worldwide, the 777 model that has sold 1649 aircraft to date and the 747 model that has sold 1574 aircraft to date, all in a period shorter than the 31 years of production of the Russian plane.
The newest Russian attempt to enter the market is the MC-21 model, which has not yet been certified and has yet to enter mass production and I doubt it will enter yet considering the war with Ukraine has exhausted the Russian economy. It will be another failure.
Therefore, until today the Russians have not achieved success in the history of their commercial aviation.
@Baisfredec stop deceiving yourself idiot...😂😂😂
Ви́ктор Степа́нович Черномы́рдин: We wanted the best, but it turned out like always. 😀😀😀
Love Russian people. This is awesome!
Thank you very much! Love to you, too!
I was the first American Jet engine mechanic for the MC-21-300 Russian Airliner in 2017.❤
The plane Boeing should have built.😢
Ura Russia!
Who determines the success or failure of a new plane is the market. Let's wait and then you tell me if the launch of that Russian plane was a success or a failure.
Russian bot
@@yogadarmawan3051 You? OK.
In 2001 my friend and mentor, Paul Duffy introduced me to Nikolai Talikov then 1st Deputy General Director Ilyushin OKB. He became General Director and was given a medal on stage by President Putin. Now retired I think. In 2001 I was on business with Tupolev ANTK and at an airshow, I got into the IL-96T which was like the 747-400 with the same Collins avionics. Back then, Ilyushin was developing the MS-21. I wish we had a more peaceful world because this is a plane I would want to own. And sell.
The comment section here is pure gold 😂
So this plane is in production since 2017 and you have managed to build SIX planes? Nice. With this rate you gonna replace the A320/B737 fleet by 3026.
Russian men tall and big so the plane ✈️ must accommodate to the large build. Knee space is very important
This is true. For a typical Russian, a Boeing 757 seat is pretty tight and short. However, in Airbus 320 or Embraer 170, there is no such problem, unless a particular plane is re-packed with max number of seats for touristic charters or lowcoster flights.
Can't wait to see this beauty
But unlike the Max this one is built for flight not for a budget, and not programmed to crash.
LOL you made my day with your comment :))))
Fantastic!!!
Great air plane !
Very beautiful
Although it comes across as an advertorial to boost national spirits I did enjoy this mini documentary.
How exciting to see Russia building aircraft again, I am a big fan of the old Illyshin, Antonov and Tupolev planes.
I love rugged soviet planes ...im sure this be great 👍
Information being presented is a year outdated. Manufactories are ready to set the production in place. MC-21 will beat American all aircrafts (or shall I say Europeans). It can't compare in fuel efficiency, quietness, space, speed, local production, software, radio communication. Only parity it has is electronics. Well done Russia!
Don't exagerate, but I do agree is a very good plane! Sadly it will probably only fly inside russia and some other countries if they don't get a certificate soon!
@@faux8311 He will fly to China, India, the Middle East and Africa. This is already enough for flights.
do not make me laugh. this aircraft has no future, since there is no way to replace all imported electronics, systems, and most importantly, it does not have a reliable good engine. all that is done with this aircraft - money is allocated and the appearance is made that something is happening. but in fact, as five copies were built in import cooperation, so they fly.
@@user-jm8cu7fs9k Курица, у него есть и российский двигатель и российская авионика. ))) И серийный выпуск со следующего года. Не знаешь не бзди.
На 3 года устарела
Ai Airbus ai boin ya nodominaranmas los suelos viva Rusia ❤❤❤❤
Ulyanovsk have great aircraft museum, with even TU144 - analogue of the French Concorde
Конкорд - аналог нашего ТУ-144
@@valerijramzes1605No. Everyone knows that the factory which developed the Concorde was spied by the Soviets, to design a poorly finished copy, the TU-144. You can continue to live in your little imaginary world if you want, we know that the Russians like to return accusations when they don't like the truth, but that won't change the truth: Concorde is the original and a marvel of technology, and the TU-144 a bad copy with design problems and disastrous technology. That's why the Concorde is legendary, and the TU-144 is seen as a joke around the world.
есть подозрения, что европейское авиостроение доживает последние годы. Ваша продукция будет неконкурентоспособна. Продолжайте гордиться старыми заслугами@@Thunderworks
@@Thunderworks "Everyone knows" - is a poor argument))
Nice!
Good for Russia. They are on the right path.
I hope countries under sanction will have a better aircraft... And also countries that want cost effective solution
looks like good plane fly
If I had the choice between an american built engine or a Russian built engine there is no choice it's Russian all the way.
Good luck then
@@bartand30 Yea see you fly with Luck ... I said I'd rather fly with a Russian engine - you really are Not thinking bartard - shooting yourself in the foot like that makes you sound american
@@bartand30 want to count the number of American aircraft that have landed badly meaning 100% deaths over the last 12 months against Russian Aircraft including Military over the same time and come back with a smile? You really should check what you're yapping on about before picking on an old guy who knows what he's talking about now pharque - off
Надеюсь что Министерство гражданской авиации восстановят. Негоже такой стране зависеть от заграничных самолетов.
Super
Bravo Russia
Авторы выпускают видео в котором нет ни слова о политике (это вообще законно сегодня?).
Но вот приходят зрители в комментарии и исправляют это.
Ребят, если вы хотите срач устроить, то идите на другие каналы. Тут нормальные люди, на интересные темы общаются.
Политика или нет, но видео тупая реклама самолёта оторванная от реальности. Как он может быть альтернативой Boeing 737 MAX если он даже ещё не производится? Почему ни одно слова не сказано про трудности производства? Самолёт уже годами опоздает, в том числе изо новых для русского авиапрома технологиях. Плюс санкции. Самолёт на половину состоит из импортных компонентов, производственное оборудование практически всё западное. Как можно об этом молчать?
@@alexandervt641 это наша современная глобальная реальность. Любой самолёт, или автомобиль, или даже телефон производится в нескольких странах. Кто-то разрабатывает технологии, кто-то редкие материалы поставляет, кто-то станки, кто-то производит комплектующие, кто-то из них собирает готовый продукт.
Это России приходится заморачиваться с импортозамещением, так как большинство исторически развитых стран сегодня поставлены в политическое стойло и лишены суверенитета.
@@danielmaster2117 Первое вы правильно написали. Только вывод не правильный: России ни приходится жить под санкциями, а надо закончить войну в Украине! Из-за этого страна была исключена из международного сообщество. Это сейчас самое важное, а не какие-то самолеты, на которых уже 20 лет наживается коррумпированная Кремлёвская власть.
@@alexandervt641 честно, я не вижу разницы между политическими амбициями властей России или какой-либо другой страны (США, Израиль, Турция, Великобритания, Марокко и другие, осуществляющие сегодня военное вмешательство на чужих территориях). Демократические ли бомбардировки, или нет; законно ли убивают людей, или же нарушают этим все международные правила и договорённости; кто честный и уважаемый "бизнес-ангел"-филантроп, а кто коррумпированный олигарх; кто террорист, а кто борец за правду; где война за справедливость, а где незаконное вторжение - это всё определяет пропаганда конкретной политической силы.
А называть "международным сообществом" США, ЕС, Японию, Корею, страны Британского содружества и несколько ничего не значащих сателлитов из Африки и островов Тихого океана я бы не стал.
Россия напала на Украину начиная самую крупную войну в Европе за 80 лет. Весь мир это осуждает, достаточно посмотреть на голосование ООН. Естественно европейцы ввели санкции. Но Кремль утверждает что они бы и так это сделали. Для этого нет никаких основании. Но под этим предлогом устраивают бесперспективную политику импортозамещения. Отечественные двигатели, компостные крыле, электронику и т.д. Даже самые продвинутые страны не могут всё самостоятельно делать, куда там Россия? Куда это ведёт мы видели в СССР. Получается что Россия и войну ведёт и тратит огромные деньги, чтобы всё дальше отставать. Это именно политическая проблема и с ней надо начинать.
Bravo!
Looks Good!
I swear I’ve seen that thumbnail somewhere before 🤔🤔🤔
what about now?
SSJ100 и Ил-96 400М на подходе
В смысле "на подходе"? Суперджеты давно вовсю летают.
great plane
Только 3 страны в мире способны разрабатывать самостоятельно - самолеты, вертолеты и космические корабли и это Россия 🇷🇺, сша и Китай 🇨🇳- так что слухи об отсталости России это очередной фейк от фейкньюс 😊
Embraer should assemble this under license.brics airplane.
Stop being an idiot, Embraer has nothing to do with the BRICS, it is a private company with its own projects.
@@BaisfredecAnd you assume they wouldn't want a strategic partnership that would benefit them because you know better? Why are you deciding it for the said private company? Are they not private enough to make decisions of their own, without listening to internet experts like you? This is why you "no war" liberals are a laughing stock of Russia and the internet as a whole.
Лучше российских самолетов летают только мыколы которые подрываются на минах 😂😂😂😂😂
BEAUTIFUL
I LOVE AIRBUS.
Nice to see so much supportive comments, folk are waking up to who the real enemy is "Nato" (america)
THANK YOU 🇷🇺 WISH YOU THE BEST 😊👏👏
Excelencia, me ha maravillado este video, este avión ruso de pasajeros está en el top de los mejores del mundo
Ребята чуть ли не руками крутят болты и гайки - если механизации производства прогресс не коснется, сложно представить себе массовый выпуск и качество сборки в будущем.
Слава России!
🇷🇺💪
Best!
Title of video MS 21 but the true name MC 21. Thanks.
The Russian letter “C” is pronounced as “s”, for example, «ресторан» (“restaurant”) sounds as “restorán”. Therefore, the Russian “MC-21” is pronounced as “em es dvádtsad odín". The ’C’ in this acronym is for the word “samolyót” (“airplane”).
Почитал комментарии. Я вижу, как корчит западных обывателей. Это потому что всем обещали, что Россия умрет через пару месяце из-за санкций, а на самом деле санкции пошли России на пользу. Оказывается, что мы очень много чего можем производить сами, что раньше закупали на западе.
Это свидомых корчит. Обыватели как раз за нас!
❤Russland hat die Amis und Europa weit hinter sich gelassen.Nicht Masse zählt sondern Zuverlässigkeit, müssen die Amis noch viel lernen.
Von den Technologien die Airbus alleine für den A380 entwickelt hat haben die Russen noch nie was gehört. Fahr mal nach Toulouse oder nach Hamburg, von so einer automatisierten und dadurch nahezu Fehlerfreien Produktion können die Russen und auch die Amerikaner nur Träumen.
Very beautiful plane
Sir - Your Topic Heading says MS21 ???? I thought this is MC21????
GOD IS GOOD HE ALWAYS BELIEVES DELIGENT,TRUE,BREAVY AND HONESTY SO HE COME INTO WORLD TO SITUATED THIS 4THINGS
Allahuakbar
1.3% of superjets built have crashed. 0.15% of 737 Max built have crashed and the software issue has been fixed. Pretty clear which plane is much much safer. So yes, I'll keep flying in the 737 instead of a Russian death trap
Ты лучше пешком ходи, но тогда будет вероятность, что тебе кирпич на голову упадёт.
Daun !
bałbym się tym latać
it's deff will win the market with 3-5 airplanes per year.
As someone who worked on B737 and A320 families this Russian bird looks rarely similar to me and I would feel privileged working on these gals I'm more than sure she has many flaws but my first impression was lovely!
Ну и какие недостатки ???
@@valerijramzes1605 the airframe and all the screws are metric like in all Russian planes.
Meanwhile nearly all commercial aeroplanes and military aeroplanes are in Imperial even planes made in the EU.
So most maintenance base would hate to buy new tools to service her.
Unreliable engines.
Engines can have a lot of faults even PW1500 and V2500 and these engines were developed in the '90s
Lack of spare parts and probably not many countries will buy her.
Outside Russia
you should stop drinking in the morning my friend
@@beenthere6769 tell me if she is in imperial
without MCAS killing everybody on board. Perfect
Russia 🇷🇺 has its own system.. Don’t worry yourself about Russia planes crashing..
Don't worry, there is no probability you will ever fly by this airplane.
You are making Russia great again !
Most countries won't buy this aircraft because of the lack of Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreements which means the aircraft must be certificated by the Civil Aviation Authority of the country that wants to purchase/operate it. The process is not only impossible politically (for most countries) but also not economically feasible. In addition, what airline CEO in his right mind would want to buy an aircraft from Russia and risk not being able to get spare parts??? None.
No problem, we don't need to sell these planes, we'll fly them ourselves))!
I was simply responding to the claims that the MS-21 would compete (against A321 or B737) internationally.....I never said you won't/can't fly them domestically (Russia), have fun with that. @s8le3lu4z