I never knew I was using a vernier caliper wrong. This is by far one of the most useful tools a person can have. Measures bolt sizes so you can cut the guess work out of trying to find the right socket. Useful af.
If you read the main scale in millimetres, you can just add the vernier reading to it as tenths of a millimetre. 7.5 would be 75 millimetres and 6.4 on the vernier scale would be 0.64 millimetres, which makes the measurement 75.64 millimetres!
first of all what least count of this vernier in metric system. 50 divi of vernier scale = 49 div of main scale and one division of main scale is equal to 1 mm (0.10cm). hence least count will be 1/50 = 0.02mm or 0.002 cm. Now we analyse each reading. No vernier readings comes in decimal but it will always be counted as whole number divisions, like 22, or 45 or 10 etc.The vernier division counts and readings thus will be as under respectively Not 2.2 but will be 12 Not 6.4 but will be 34 Not 1.4 but will be 09 Thus readings 12x0.002 cm = 0.024cm 34x0.002 cm = 0.068cm 09x0.002 cm = 0.018cm So both reading will be added thus dia of coin will be 2.124 cm (not 2.122), inner dia of tap roll will be 7.568 cm (not 7.564) and depth will be 4.818 cm (not 4.814)
yes sir you are right, because least division on vernier scale measure is 0.02 mm and each line or division is of 0.02 mm so if the 2nd line is matching after 10 on VS then it will be 0.24 so in first example reading will be 21.24mm not 21.22 mm
This is actually pretty helpful. Still really complicated but it's kind of easy to wrap your head around when you give it a try. I bet I'll be visiting this video a lot in the near future.
Sorry, but your measurements are not correct. You have forgotten that vernier scale on your caliper is 0.02 mm not 0.01 mm. So, readings should be 2.124 not 2.122; 7.568 not 7.564; 4.818 not 4.814
The Vernier scale here has only five small division between each large division and each small division represents an incremental misalignment of an additional TWO one-hundredths of a millimeter. Going into this video I knew nothing about Vernier scales, so I didn't know if I could assume that the small markings were in fact linear divisions of the large markings and not some other weird thing. Maybe it was obvious to other people, but I spent an extra 15 minutes watching some other tutorial just because you guys didn't explicitly put that into words! I liked the music though, by the way.
I subscribed after seeing this video .It was so simple and easy to understand.Awesome video.Didnt notice the music as my phone's volume was already silent.
Thanks. Just got into the steel fabrication industry and I all see is Verniers and Screw gauges. So thanks! Feels nice to relearn something that you learnt in high school!
In your first example, I would've read the vernier, at that setting, as 21.22mm. I believe that that's how the metric World (perhaps not the US, though) would read it. In other words, there is no arithmetic involved - the whole number (21mm) is obvious (on the major scale - the first step) and the fraction ( 0.22mm) which refines the measurement to the nearest 50th of a millimetre, is then 'attached' upon reading the closest approximation on the minor scale.
for the first time in my life, I understood this thing, thanks to you and thanks to the indian education system to prevent me from understanding till now.
That was fantastic! Thank you so much. The job I'm applying for would like you to have some experience in reading a vernier scale. Looking at your video, I picked up the principles very quickly. Thanks again (you're a good teacher)
The music was too busy and distracting for my tastes. I just muted it finally so I I could read the content. I guess if you process math at the same speed as the music it's perfect. I don't.
Yeah. I found it perfect, kept me interested in doing the math(which I'd usually have found boring) and watching the whole video. I didn't know that the depth could be measured before :O
I thought the music not only "distracting", but also REVOLTING. It is better fitting for an episode of the Happiness Hour on the Dennis Prager Radio Show or a Georgia pubic broadcasting system presentation of how to use a camera to take pictures.
such a good video and the background music is actually refreshing if you hear it at low volume...i dont know why did 298 people dislike it...anyways thanks a lot...please make more such videos...
Well this is interesting. Never was told about this method till now. All my teachers LITERALLY said "just add the vernier reading at the end of the main reading."
Your teachers aren't necessarily wrong, it just depends on the scale being used. Their method works for vernier scales with 10 divisions. Our method will work for *any* vernier scale.
Thanks for the video, it was really helpful ! To those in universities, I am a science student who is about to go to last year of high school. I don't know which field to take b/c I don't really know what I like to do for the rest of my life. So How are ur experiences : Is it hard or complicated? How many years does it take? What are the career options that I have by studying physics,chemistry,biology,maths, computer so far? I really need help!!!
In the machinist world it would be read 21.22 MM I never refer to CM it's always MM, the CM is a huge measurement, the military refers to caliber of weapons in MM as well never CM.
Amazing video! I was studying for an event for Science Olympiad. I couldn't understand how to use it. I searched up it on youtube and found your video. Great video! Very clear and easy to understand. Thanks for making this video! Really appreciate it :)
yeah thanks for this one, im gonna make my professor proud tomorrow. i didnt listen to her when shes demonstrating it! im ready for our individuall actual test tomorrow goodluck to me!
MARK K which, as I've stated in many other comment replies, only works if the vernier scale has 10 divisions. We are trying to be more complete in our explanations than that.
Explain visually the cooling down effects of a slap down by a hot babe 1) who might have been touchable 2) who wasn't and 3) who was protected by Bluto.
Thanks for the video, it is a great help. I think you got the last calculation wrong though. You lined the vernier scale up at 1.4 but the divisions are each 0.2 and so it should have been 1.8 Please tell me if I am wrong.
+gabriel nero ebdani No. I don't understand where you got the factor of 0.02. In this case, working in millimetres, you would multiply 22 by 0.01 (or divide 22 by 100 as there are 100 units on the Vernier Scale) . Realistically, there is a simple way to check on this. Look at the scale where the dime is being measured. Does it look like it's close to 21.5? If it was 21.44, the major line would be closer to 21.5 than 21.0.
well, the confusion arises from the fact that you talk about centimeters, when the vernier you are holding measures everything in millimeters. This is obvious if you look at the smallest measurement possible, which is 0.02 mm, as clearly stated on your vernier caliper. So it measures directly in mm, not cm. Of course, you can convert to centimeters afterwards.
Thanks I finally understand it. But I think you totally over explained it. The vernier number should simply be added on to the first measurement. So 2.1 with 2.2 tacked on is 2.122 Much easier!
SMUPhysics that doesn’t make any sense at all. It works on any Vernier scale as long as you know your divisions (which in this case is .002 not .001 as implied by the math in the video).
[Mistake] The precision of Vernier Caliper should be 0.01 cm (0.1 mm). In order to obtain reading up to 0.001 cm (0.01 mm) accuracy, Micrometre screw gauge should be used instead.
[Not a mistake]. You are probably only familiar with callipers with 10 divisions on the vernier scale. In that case, you would be correct. But this caliper has a finer resolution on the vernier scale and therefore the precision cited is correct.
SMUPhysics Even though you're right most people (like me) are used to 0.1 vernier scale so this one might seem a bit awkward, I'm in general familiar with 0.01 version of the scale but I simply never used it, not even in school we only mentioned it's existence so for measuring 0.01 I alwayas use micrometer, that's most probably the reason he was confused about this video.... You actually made only one mistake that I assume no one noticed... when you explained that the depth measured is the same as space betwen the main jaws: you used the wrong part of the jaws; you are supposed to measure it with only the sloped part (first centimeter) of the jaws, and not to stuff the measured element all the way to the main scale... You'll see what I meant at 02:11 what you did there was wrong... (don't take this as an insult, it was just a small friedly notification :))
It took me a while but I see your point now. Yeah, we were a bit sloppy showing the equivalence between the depth measurement and the space between the main jaws. Thanks for pointing that out! We intentionally used a caliper that didn't have the usual 0.1 scale in order to make the video more general. Hopefully, we haven't caused too much confusion by doing so. We'd like people to understand the vernier scale better than just being taught to use one special instance (even if it is arguably the most common).
Can this be use to measure paper. For example, you count the first 50 sheets then use this Vernier Caliper to measure the other sheets based on the measurements of the counted 50 sheets to get 50 "counted' sheets?
As long as each of the 50 sheets is identical, that should work. Measuring 50 at once will give you an average thickness. Doing a standard error analysis will tell you if your measurement error is > One sheet.
It looks like, on the small scale, there are only 5 marks between numbers. I would think each mark would equal .02. But I have never done this before, just commenting.
+Lakshman Gamlath No that's true, but it does coincide with the 0 on the smaller slide part as you can see on the video when the jaws are completely closed at around 0:12.
It's not simply the number of lines on the vernier scale, you the numbers that label the lines (though if there are no labels, then you would just count them). It's related to the spacing of the lines on the vernier scale as compared to the spacing on the main scale.
SMUPhysics I think the vernier scale is 50 mm. Thus 50 line on the vernier scale equal 49 line on the main scale. So I think this caliper has accuracy to the 1/50=0.02 mm. Therefore, when you get the number on the vernier scale you have to multiply it by 0.02, right? If you have a vernier scale that is 10 cm long then yes you multiply it by 0.01. But from my experience I see no caliper has such accuracy. The maximum accuracy is usually to the 0.02 mm. If I went down to the 10 micrometre I often use a micrometer. Am I right?
I never knew I was using a vernier caliper wrong.
This is by far one of the most useful tools a person can have. Measures bolt sizes so you can cut the guess work out of trying to find the right socket.
Useful af.
CalculyticCuber Glad you found the video enlightening!
If you read the main scale in millimetres, you can just add the vernier reading to it as tenths of a millimetre. 7.5 would be 75 millimetres and 6.4 on the vernier scale would be 0.64 millimetres, which makes the measurement 75.64 millimetres!
first of all what least count of this vernier in metric system. 50 divi of vernier scale = 49 div of main scale and one division of main scale is equal to 1 mm (0.10cm). hence least count will be 1/50 = 0.02mm or 0.002 cm. Now we analyse each reading.
No vernier readings comes in decimal but it will always be counted as whole number divisions, like 22, or 45 or 10 etc.The vernier division counts and readings thus will be as under respectively
Not 2.2 but will be 12
Not 6.4 but will be 34
Not 1.4 but will be 09
Thus readings
12x0.002 cm = 0.024cm
34x0.002 cm = 0.068cm
09x0.002 cm = 0.018cm
So both reading will be added thus dia of coin will be 2.124 cm (not 2.122), inner dia of tap roll will be 7.568 cm (not 7.564) and depth will be 4.818 cm (not 4.814)
Thanks, I almost fell for the trap of this video!
Thanks a lot sir we may had mistaken in our practicals if you hadn't corrected them.
yes sir you are right, because least division on vernier scale measure is 0.02 mm and each line or division is of 0.02 mm so if the 2nd line is matching after 10 on VS then it will be 0.24 so in first example reading will be 21.24mm not 21.22 mm
This is actually pretty helpful. Still really complicated but it's kind of easy to wrap your head around when you give it a try. I bet I'll be visiting this video a lot in the near future.
Sorry, but your measurements are not correct. You have forgotten that vernier scale on your caliper is 0.02 mm not 0.01 mm. So, readings should be 2.124 not 2.122; 7.568 not 7.564; 4.818 not 4.814
you are correct
yeah I was thinking the same thing
yep you are right ..bad video
Seriously? I go to this university and got reccomended this video.... sigh... going somewhere else then!
I wonder how many students failed a course at SMU because they actually knew how to read the vernier scale?
When I first saw the vernier caliper I thought it was a weapon great vedio by the way
THIS WAS VEEERY VEEEERRRRYYY HELPFUL.Probably the best video on TH-cam about vernier calipers !!!
Thanks!
The Vernier scale here has only five small division between each large division and each small division represents an incremental misalignment of an additional TWO one-hundredths of a millimeter. Going into this video I knew nothing about Vernier scales, so I didn't know if I could assume that the small markings were in fact linear divisions of the large markings and not some other weird thing. Maybe it was obvious to other people, but I spent an extra 15 minutes watching some other tutorial just because you guys didn't explicitly put that into words!
I liked the music though, by the way.
Who's practical exam is tommorow?
mine
Mine lol
Mine😂
mine is today itself 😁😁
re-says TV got it right bro😁😁😂
I subscribed after seeing this video .It was so simple and easy to understand.Awesome video.Didnt notice the music as my phone's volume was already silent.
Thanks. Just got into the steel fabrication industry and I all see is Verniers and Screw gauges. So thanks! Feels nice to relearn something that you learnt in high school!
Glad to be a help! Good luck in your new career.
i realize that my comment is late as this vid has been posted waaay long ago but can i just say that this jazz music is SICK lmao
I am about to throw up in my mouth and worship the porcelain bowl.
In your first example, I would've read the vernier, at that setting, as 21.22mm. I believe that that's how the metric World (perhaps not the US, though) would read it.
In other words, there is no arithmetic involved - the whole number (21mm) is obvious (on the major scale - the first step) and the fraction ( 0.22mm) which refines the measurement to the nearest 50th of a millimetre, is then 'attached' upon reading the closest approximation on the minor scale.
for the first time in my life, I understood this thing, thanks to you
and thanks to the indian education system to prevent me from understanding till now.
You made my life easier. You explained a ten min vedio in just 2 mins. Thanks a tonne.
+Trisha Bhugra Glad you found it useful!
That was fantastic! Thank you so much. The job I'm applying for would like you to have some experience in reading a vernier scale. Looking at your video, I picked up the principles very quickly. Thanks again (you're a good teacher)
+enlightened child Thanks! Glad you found it useful. Good luck with the job!
+enlightened child you can always just use a digital vernier
i am able to give answer thanks for video
Thanks a Million...only video on the youtube which has explained it in such a simple manner
Thankyou so much ! I have a practical exam tomorrow and i finally get it! Great music too, btw. :P
Thanks. And goods luck on your exam!
The music was too busy and distracting for my tastes. I just muted it finally so I I could read the content. I guess if you process math at the same speed as the music it's perfect. I don't.
Yeah. I found it perfect, kept me interested in doing the math(which I'd usually have found boring) and watching the whole video. I didn't know that the depth could be measured before :O
I like jazz for detail work, the precision of the music is helpful.
No worries. The creator of this video could not process the math either, because these answers are wrong.
I thought the music not only "distracting", but also REVOLTING. It is better fitting for an episode of the Happiness Hour on the Dennis Prager Radio Show or a Georgia pubic broadcasting system presentation of how to use a camera to take pictures.
such a good video and the background music is actually refreshing if you hear it at low volume...i dont know why did 298 people dislike it...anyways thanks a lot...please make more such videos...
You must be THE one in 298 who is from Planet Deef.
I have to learn this for Science and I think my brain is half gone
Thank you very much! This is helping me understand how to use a Vernier Scale in order to measure circular diameter objects!
Only video that explained it concisely and succinctly. Thank you!!
+Suzanne W (Sue) Thanks so much! Glad it helped you.
Well this is interesting. Never was told about this method till now. All my teachers LITERALLY said "just add the vernier reading at the end of the main reading."
Your teachers aren't necessarily wrong, it just depends on the scale being used. Their method works for vernier scales with 10 divisions. Our method will work for *any* vernier scale.
Thank you so much for your video. I am a freshman this year, and couldn't understand how to use vernier caliper at all. It helped a lot, I got it! :)
I love using these they are so handy to have around a machine shop they make measuring stuff precisely easy
Thanks for the video. But I don't understand why you need to divide the measurement on the vernier scale by the number of divisions, 10 in the case.
Thanks for the video, it was really helpful !
To those in universities,
I am a science student who is about to go to last year of high school. I don't know which field to take b/c I don't really know what I like to do for the rest of my life.
So
How are ur experiences :
Is it hard or complicated?
How many years does it take?
What are the career options that I have by studying physics,chemistry,biology,maths, computer so far?
I really need help!!!
I don't know how I will thanks you for this video this is such a very excellent video
In the machinist world it would be read 21.22 MM I never refer to CM it's always MM, the CM is a huge measurement, the military refers to caliber of weapons in MM as well never CM.
thnx i didn't understand much at school but after I saw your video I am able to answer
r u studying 9th grade? @Aditya Singh
Nope 8th
Though we have this
I have it in 7th though we call it Secondary 1 here.
Nice
Amazing video!
I was studying for an event for Science Olympiad.
I couldn't understand how to use it.
I searched up it on youtube and found your video.
Great video!
Very clear and easy to understand.
Thanks for making this video!
Really appreciate it :)
Glad to be a help! Let us know how the Olympiad goes!
loved this tutorial and i loved the music as well
Watching this a day before exam. Really helpful man. Thanks!
Pranshu Chaturvedi Good luck on your exam. Let us know how goes!
+Pranshu Chaturvedi literally this is what im doing right now lol.
Short and sweet. Perfect. I now know how to read a vernier caliper, thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
Great Video, the only video on youtube that explained about vernier caliper nicely
thank you very much . Now I Officially understand how to use vernier calliper in my Engineering 3rd year :')
I felt this
guess what we have to do it in 11th to go for 12th, We are in Good hands and then their is you who understood in engineering 3rd year
@@gamerwolf5fexaka.vishnu203 why are you such an asshole
@@Joseph-kp8iz bruh I said coz I wanted to know whether he was thought abt vernier calliper during 11th or 12th
My late father-in-law owned one of these, and we were wondering how it worked. Thanks for the tips!
I didn't understand the multiplication of vernier scale reading. Can someone please explain?
use BODMAS.
yeah thanks for this one, im gonna make my professor proud tomorrow. i didnt listen to her when shes demonstrating it! im ready for our individuall actual test tomorrow goodluck to me!
Good luck. But a word of advice: if you really want to make your professor proud, listen to her when she's teaching you! :)
So did you pass? If you didn’t, this video is to blame.
It was an amazing video! Very clear and extremely useful.
no gimmicks just the good stuff.....keep up the work
Thanks!
This is the best video on Vernier Caliper , Subscribed
thanks man , one way or another u helped me out 👍👍
thanx, it is so simple and easy to understand
Thanks for such educative post my son has appreciated
you outsmarted himself - just the second number we assign to the end of the first
MARK K which, as I've stated in many other comment replies, only works if the vernier scale has 10 divisions. We are trying to be more complete in our explanations than that.
can u please upload other videos like
co efficent of friction
newton's law of cooling
Explain visually the cooling down effects of a slap down by a hot babe 1) who might have been touchable 2) who wasn't and 3) who was protected by Bluto.
why the zero is not level with the 1st tip ? Anyone can answer pls.. Cause I have the same caliper, and I think, I'm not reading it right.
This was awesome. But I am kinda doubtful about the 'lining up' thing and whether it will the correct explanation if my teacher asks me how to use it.
So helpful,Thank you!
Anyway thanks bro. after 2 days is my practical exam. This was very helpful.
thanks........ this was the best video to understand the concept of vernier caliper.
very helpful
+dany Thanks!
2:15 to 2:17 does the Caliper change readings? I feel like It was measuring 4.9 and then went to 4.8 in the transition. Very confusing.
aw man you saved my practicals thanx a lot buddy
thanks i needed this for practicals physics
thank you so much for your simple but very useful practical explanation
Thanks for the kind words!
Thanks for the video, it is a great help. I think you got the last calculation wrong though. You lined the vernier scale up at 1.4 but the divisions are each 0.2 and so it should have been 1.8 Please tell me if I am wrong.
0.2 is of the vernier scale we hv to tak e d smallest division of the main scale
You are not wrong, except for the fact that all of the other answers were wrong too.
SIR/MAM u explain this so much better than my physics teacher
+Riju Ban Thank you!
SMUPhysics no seriously thanks.....I got all my measurements correct in my practical exam today so thanks a ton and keep up the good work
+Riju Ban Congratulations on the exam! And thanks for letting us know. We love hearing about people benefitting from our videos.
its very use full for our practicals physics
!!!!!!!!!!
varun ramesh hey seriously it was very use fuullll !!!!
luck favoured me as i got even the same.......!
Very good tutorial on use of vernier calipers
Thanks!
Thank you. Really short and understandable too
So AS Practical tmr and rn.. I'm just desperate.
what is the other scale on top used for, thats what i dont understant
That's the imperial scale (inches etc).
Simple n grt video
Thanks
Great! Now I clearly understand how to use vernier caliper.
Awesome!
What a great video... That's nice to prepare for practicals
Thanks! And good luck with your practicals!
I don't understand the second example with measuring on the vernier scale its confusing me
What ?? Was that I mean isn't it supposed to be added instead as multiplied ?
super video quality and very good editing.....honestly ....this is a very helpful video.
This is super helpful, but the music is rather distracting
isnt it 21 + (22 * 0.02) = 21.44 mm. ?
+gabriel nero ebdani No. I don't understand where you got the factor of 0.02. In this case, working in millimetres, you would multiply 22 by 0.01 (or divide 22 by 100 as there are 100 units on the Vernier Scale) .
Realistically, there is a simple way to check on this. Look at the scale where the dime is being measured. Does it look like it's close to 21.5? If it was 21.44, the major line would be closer to 21.5 than 21.0.
well, the confusion arises from the fact that you talk about centimeters, when the vernier you are holding measures everything in millimeters. This is obvious if you look at the smallest measurement possible, which is 0.02 mm, as clearly stated on your vernier caliper. So it measures directly in mm, not cm. Of course, you can convert to centimeters afterwards.
Thank you, it's realy helpfull. Your explanation is easy to understand.
Thanks! Glad you found it useful.
practicls r nearing !!!
the increment on the vernier scale is 0.02. so the reading on the vernier scale is ( 2.4/10)×0.1=0.024cm.
Thanks, has helped me get ready for the physics practicals.......
I didn't understand in depth measurement. How it is 1.4 in the lining up
Thanks I finally understand it. But I think you totally over explained it.
The vernier number should simply be added on to the first measurement. So 2.1 with 2.2 tacked on is 2.122
Much easier!
That really only works if your caliper has 10 divisions. We tried to be more general than that.
SMUPhysics Oh okay, I assumed there are all made that way. Mine has the 10 divisions as well.
SMUPhysics that doesn’t make any sense at all. It works on any Vernier scale as long as you know your divisions (which in this case is .002 not .001 as implied by the math in the video).
it was a great help 😊😊
Great explanation 👍
Thanks!
Thanks a lot....i understood well how to take readings nd can do my practicals well now..
Thanks once again
[Mistake] The precision of Vernier Caliper should be 0.01 cm (0.1 mm).
In order to obtain reading up to 0.001 cm (0.01 mm) accuracy, Micrometre screw gauge should be used instead.
[Not a mistake]. You are probably only familiar with callipers with 10 divisions on the vernier scale. In that case, you would be correct. But this caliper has a finer resolution on the vernier scale and therefore the precision cited is correct.
SMUPhysics Even though you're right most people (like me) are used to 0.1 vernier scale so this one might seem a bit awkward, I'm in general familiar with 0.01 version of the scale but I simply never used it, not even in school we only mentioned it's existence so for measuring 0.01 I alwayas use micrometer, that's most probably the reason he was confused about this video....
You actually made only one mistake that I assume no one noticed... when you explained that the depth measured is the same as space betwen the main jaws: you used the wrong part of the jaws; you are supposed to measure it with only the sloped part (first centimeter) of the jaws, and not to stuff the measured element all the way to the main scale... You'll see what I meant at 02:11 what you did there was wrong... (don't take this as an insult, it was just a small friedly notification :))
It took me a while but I see your point now. Yeah, we were a bit sloppy showing the equivalence between the depth measurement and the space between the main jaws. Thanks for pointing that out!
We intentionally used a caliper that didn't have the usual 0.1 scale in order to make the video more general. Hopefully, we haven't caused too much confusion by doing so. We'd like people to understand the vernier scale better than just being taught to use one special instance (even if it is arguably the most common).
Do we follow the same procedure for vernier scales with 20 divisions?
Yes! We made sure that the formulae given in the video applied to all scales.
Can this be use to measure paper. For example, you count the first 50 sheets then use this Vernier Caliper to measure the other sheets based on the measurements of the counted 50 sheets to get 50 "counted' sheets?
As long as each of the 50 sheets is identical, that should work. Measuring 50 at once will give you an average thickness. Doing a standard error analysis will tell you if your measurement error is > One sheet.
The music is a distraction
That's what the volume buttons are for! :)
Strawb3rry Lime roasted😂😂😂
lmao.
SMUPhysics not when the music adds nothing and is therefore an utterly pointless distraction, rather like your comment...
I mean the sound can be muted. This is pointless..... like if complaining made a difference XDD
Wow, that was amazing!
hiii.....correctly on 1:04..........what is the meaning of ...10 IN THIS CASE?/...........can u pls clear my doubt???
These are much better than the cheap digital ones..
very helpful... especially for my physics practicals.. thnx alot
It looks like, on the small scale, there are only 5 marks between numbers. I would think each mark would equal .02. But I have never done this before, just commenting.
hi what does it mean of the smallest division of the main scale? why is it 0.1cm? how did it arrive to the value of 0.1?
ahhh nevermind I get it
But the 0 on main scale doesn't coincide with the place where the coin begins... Somebody explain?
+Lakshman Gamlath No that's true, but it does coincide with the 0 on the smaller slide part as you can see on the video when the jaws are completely closed at around 0:12.
what's the name of the piece at the introduction and ending?
I fully understood it .This was really great!
Excellent!
thanks ...helped in my practicals
thanks so much! came here to measure parts for a vintage mountain bike im restoring.
Bro' please add a best video of measurement of spherometer. Thanks
I'll add it to the list. Thanks for the suggestion.
I think you did it wrong. There were 50 lines on the vernier scale, so you have to divide it by 50 am I right?
It's not simply the number of lines on the vernier scale, you the numbers that label the lines (though if there are no labels, then you would just count them). It's related to the spacing of the lines on the vernier scale as compared to the spacing on the main scale.
SMUPhysics I think the vernier scale is 50 mm. Thus 50 line on the vernier scale equal 49 line on the main scale. So I think this caliper has accuracy to the 1/50=0.02 mm. Therefore, when you get the number on the vernier scale you have to multiply it by 0.02, right?
If you have a vernier scale that is 10 cm long then yes you multiply it by 0.01. But from my experience I see no caliper has such accuracy. The maximum accuracy is usually to the 0.02 mm. If I went down to the 10 micrometre I often use a micrometer. Am I right?
Best caliper video ever
thanks a lot.... I suppose it is the only video to understand this well.